Last year they advertised 3000 nits but the S95D tops at 1600 nits after calibration or in most accurate picture mode (based on Rtings measurements). Maybe tops at 2000 nits in vivid mode. So its clear we won't see 4000 nits in the S95F.
It’s interesting how the different company’s used the 3rd gen panels last year with the S95D and the refreshed A95L .. I wonder if Sony will again push this new gen panels more than Samsung will do 2,200 -2,500 nits 10% .. water that may be on full screen brightness… crazy OLED has surpassed my 75 Z9D.. time to upgrade
These numbers they advertize are with a way cooler white point than 6500k, also I think Samsung may actually be advertizing the brightness of peak ANAPEAK values.
the LG OLEDs advertised 3000 nits as well. They use very small windows and vivid modes. At least this guy was honest and told us the measurements at the exact window sizes, props to this guy. Didn't expect him to say 4k nits was only on 3% window lol
Keep in mind this is the Samsung Display booth so they'll boast with maximum luminance. This year's S90F and S95F QD-OLED TVs will be capped to 390 cd full screen and ~2 K cd 10%.
@@wblebon Doubt, that is still theoretical peak. Actual TVs will have lower 1% max, 3.5K capped maybe. However, we will still be able to push everything to max from service menu, voiding the warranty, of course.
@Xenocyde300 Exactly don't update firmware until you have read it's ok on AVS forum still don't like matte coating but it's better then wrgb oled from LG because of higher color volume in nits gonna upgrade if price is right
@@wblebon I'm based in EU and I want to buy a 55-incher, but I feel Sammy is gonna screw this zone again with WOLED panels for most of the 2025 QD-OLED lineup. Maybe Panasonic could turn the tables this year with tandem OLED.
they upgraded the mat finish, i believe its called anti - glare 2.0 probably less matt the last gen but not glossy. so S95F semi matt and S90F glossy i believe.
@@theheroofourtime3578 the one connect box on S95 was already a no go for me because of the issues with pc might aswell be matte lol, S90 series does all things quite well with less price.
@parvchoudhary1732 still got issues with the connect box where do you got this information is this for last year model as we speak in terms of the S95D
It seems like there are very few gaming monitors at CES this year compared to last year? I was really hoping for a nice new 21 by 9 gaming monitor! :-/
Why have the QD-OLED TV brightness increases not translated to QD-OLED monitor brightness increases? Still seeing the peak 1000 and 250 nit full screen brightness there after 3 years.
So how good can it performed from having burning issues? Also, please make glossy QD-OLED TV's at 55-65" for everyone that they can have.. Coming out other QD-OLED TV's by only 85-165" is ridiculous in my book.
yeah but why cant it be same top brightness at any window size? would it exceed the usual 15A outlet? maybe god forbids adding heatsinks to screens? I never see this addressed
Both LG and Samsung's premium TVs are gonna be amazing and picking the better at this stage is pretty trivial; I would just buy whichever has the better price in your region, or compare their other properties like the software experience, build quality etc.
They have a 5K OLED listed on their roadmap (seen in the AVforums Samsung interview). I wish they would just give us 37" 5K right now (same PPI as 27" 4K).
Samsung displays always look great…fix the processing so that you can compete with the likes of Sony and LG. Most people are still watching 720p, 1080i, 1080p. It is your job to make these inferior resolutions that we are still stuck using, perform flawlessly on your 4k and 8k displays.
Some other tv guys are reporting on youtube that the QD-OLED 83 Inch is not happening. Can anyone shed some light on this? I am bummed out if it is true!
Yeah, once OLEDs hit around 1000 nits highlights and 200 nits plus for full screen there is only little improvements to be made. Main ones being near black handling could be better (it either crushes or lifts the shadow detail making dithering necessary and has less colour in dark scenes with QD-OLEDs), less ABL, brighter for High APL scenes, motion, DSE. Since OLED already has the best viewing angles with the best contrast, sharpness, clarity, motion and less DSE. We just need brighter per pixel displays and better motion handling or tech. That can get away from the sample and hold method which causes jerkiness, when the camera pans while watching content or playing games. CRT and Plasmas didn't suffer from as bad motion clarity problems as todays displays, they could definitely improve on that.
Pitch dark room means they didn't fix the magenta glow in lit rooms, still using triangle pixel structure which means this is bad news for computer monitors. None of this is good news for monitors.
Probably a small market for it? Most people buy the 55" I think, then 65", then the 75-77"....83-85" would have even smaller sales than the 75- 77". And since they cost more than an LCD of the same size, it's most likely a tiny market for large OLEDs. And to manufacturer them would take even more R&D that might not be worth it for them, at least for now. Remember OLEDs are more expensive for a reason, more can go wrong while printing so many sub-pixels (8.1 million pixels x 4 sub-pixels per pixel plus Colour Filters or 8.1 million blue sub-pixels for QD-OLED plus Quantum Dot layer, which means they should be cheaper than WOLEDs) and the larger the panel the more failures and the panels need to be binned......or recut into smaller ones maybe?
Very impressive nit figures, but are they at Filmmaker or Dynamic (Samsung's Vivid) mode? Would also have asked if they're working on the purple tint at all, or if it's so innate (light scattering from QDs and all that) that it can't be changed in the foreseeable future. To me, ambient lit black levels and static image burn-in are the main 2 concerns I have with QD-OLED. WOLED has amazing blacks even in a dim room, and a longer/better track record at mitigating permanent image retention. QD-OLED has much more color saturation headroom but it doesn't come to use in a majority of real-world content, while pure blacks in a lit room definitely do. Oh and Samsung has also had hiccups with their TV software; the TV OS experience would've been worth asking about as well.
It didnt make it sadly, was false news, but it is using the g5 4 stack oled possibly, plus mla on top which lg itself doesnt even have, so it could be the brightest oled of all.
Absolutely not! Samsung absolutely ruined their tv lineup by slapping all their tv panels with a matte finish. It distorts the picture quality that you’d expect from a premium tv. What a shame. The least they could have done is give us the option to choose between a gloss and matte finish.
if they can hit 400nits+ on 100% window on big TVs, surely they can do 400 or even 500nits full white screen on 27, 32 inch monitors no? i hope they will be out this year
It depends, the difference is cooling. A big TV has lots of area to spread the heat so that it doesn’t burn or overheat, otherwise we could have seen TV like brightness in monitors long ago.
It is brighter, outperform blah blah blah... what about the quality control ? Ive never seen flimsier tv that bend like hell like the s90d... Black stuff coming out from the top back bezel, uneven ag coating etc etc🙄
You are mixing up companies that share a name. Samsung Display, which makes QD-OLED panels, would say the first. Samsung Electronics, which makes TVs and buys panels from many companies, would say the second.
@@NhNeoN88 I am not trying to defend Samsung Electronics. That company is being dodgy about QD-OLEDs and WOLEDs, maybe due to contractual requirements from LG Display which makes WOLEDs which have been inferior and probably required that in order to sell WOLED panels to Samsung Electronics. Samsung Display appears to have clean hands, but Samsung Electronics has unclean hands. LG Display’s new 4-stack WOLED panels which replace the wideband yellow layer from its 3-stack WOLED panels with red and green layers should greatly improve color purity compared to previous WOLEDs, but still dilute colors with white at the highest brightnesses. 3-stack WOLED panels use color filters to extract red and green from the wideband yellow layer, but the resulting red and green are going to have some yellow mixed in. The other two layers in 3-stack WOLED panels are blue layers. Maybe that could improve the 83 inch OLED TVs.
@1:24 Just look at all those blown out colours, the blue sky is completely white, the blue jeans are almost white on the left hand side. The colours are un-natural and blown to pieces.
Never judge an HDR display based on an SDR camera pointed at it especially one that likely doesn’t have its exposure really dialed in and is causing clipping.
@@Reallynotnick Ok well we the viewers are viewing what your camera is seeing, whether or not you have correct camera settings becomes irrelevant when there are two screens being shown in the same video footage and last years model's colours look better than the 2025 over exposed blown out colours. Begs the question of which lens is telling the truth?
He is correct and others completely wrong yikes sorry guys. It's definitely blowing color out, esp the reds. Thing is the definition of brighter is literally more white and less saturated lol. Saturatuon has to with greys and purity, BRIGHTNESS has to with how much black and white there is meaning adding white equals brighter. By definition saying its brighter and therefore whiter also says less saturated. Interestingly increasing saturatuon at equal luminance does appears brighter but nonetheless is equal luminance.
@@daz3434babsolutely correct it is an issue yet unnecessary. By definition brighter is more white saturation is greys. So if you are certain its a brighter version of a color then it has more white meaning desaturated!
I'm reminded every time oled gets brighter by the idiots that claimed the technology was inherently too dark, at a dead end and not capable of getting brighter anymore. The last argument I had about that was just prior to the... s95b. I'm now laughing my ass of since one of them just got an Oled without even realising it was one and here is the next gen just waiting to happen.
т.е. я в мониторе IPS до 50% убавляю яркость потому что глаза жжёт, а они всё больше яркости добавляют, зачем? чтобы я убавлял яркость до 10%? попахивает бредом... лучше бы выгорание излечили. про LG новый что-нибудь рассказали бы поподробней, а то предыдущее видео было как-то ни о чём
Does not exist have my S95B for 3 years no burn-in here but i take also measure like using a screensaver and hide the taskbar as using it for pc monitor
@@wblebonAre you an equivalent of a flat Earth believer? Burn-in is a fact. It is a fact, and it worsens with brightness. Moreover, all those adjustments are just a makeshift solution exaggerated by marketing to sell the product. Or are you just coping because your purchase is at the end of its life?
@@ilmistico90 as i said after 3 years of using qd-oled no burn-in and still going strong then don't buy oled go for led instead if afraid of this lol 😂
Last year they advertised 3000 nits but the S95D tops at 1600 nits after calibration or in most accurate picture mode (based on Rtings measurements). Maybe tops at 2000 nits in vivid mode.
So its clear we won't see 4000 nits in the S95F.
You have to mod it in SM and these numbers are real at FMM HDR D65 calibrated
It’s interesting how the different company’s used the 3rd gen panels last year with the S95D and the refreshed A95L .. I wonder if Sony will again push this new gen panels more than Samsung will do 2,200 -2,500 nits 10% .. water that may be on full screen brightness… crazy OLED has surpassed my 75 Z9D.. time to upgrade
Ho un 77S95D e ti posso assicurare che è davvero molto luminoso.
Ho anche un Miniled Samsung a casa.
These numbers they advertize are with a way cooler white point than 6500k, also I think Samsung may actually be advertizing the brightness of peak ANAPEAK values.
the LG OLEDs advertised 3000 nits as well. They use very small windows and vivid modes. At least this guy was honest and told us the measurements at the exact window sizes, props to this guy. Didn't expect him to say 4k nits was only on 3% window lol
No dolby vision, no glossy=less buyers. Simple as that Samsung!
Thank you for attending CES, my man !
I am more hyped up with the video you prepared last time on new tech that TV's this year would have!!!
Keep in mind this is the Samsung Display booth so they'll boast with maximum luminance. This year's S90F and S95F QD-OLED TVs will be capped to 390 cd full screen and ~2 K cd 10%.
Nope its still capable of 4000 nits in 3% window says Samsung display and that's what it is for (HDR)
@@wblebon Doubt, that is still theoretical peak. Actual TVs will have lower 1% max, 3.5K capped maybe. However, we will still be able to push everything to max from service menu, voiding the warranty, of course.
@@wblebon It's still capable, was saying Samsung Electronics will cap them via firmware. We all know how to get around that, surely.
@Xenocyde300 Exactly don't update firmware until you have read it's ok on AVS forum still don't like matte coating but it's better then wrgb oled from LG because of higher color volume in nits gonna upgrade if price is right
@@wblebon I'm based in EU and I want to buy a 55-incher, but I feel Sammy is gonna screw this zone again with WOLED panels for most of the 2025 QD-OLED lineup. Maybe Panasonic could turn the tables this year with tandem OLED.
PLEASE 42 WITH GLOSSY PANEL AND PEAK 10% AT LEAST 1600 AND I AM DONE FOR LIFE
TRUE AND REAL BROO
bro snuck in
Samsung, please release this new QD OLED panel in 42" size!
I think the new C5 LG are coming out with QD-OLED penal TV's in that size.
I was hoping you asked him about the Mat finish. Amazing panel ruined with AG
they upgraded the mat finish, i believe its called anti - glare 2.0 probably less matt the last gen but not glossy. so S95F semi matt and S90F glossy i believe.
Looks like going forward 95 series will always be matte
@@theheroofourtime3578 the one connect box on S95 was already a no go for me because of the issues with pc might aswell be matte lol, S90 series does all things quite well with less price.
If it was ruined then how was It voted best home theater TV in HDTV test shootout? the matte finish is different this year anyway. supposedly better.
@parvchoudhary1732 still got issues with the connect box where do you got this information is this for last year model as we speak in terms of the S95D
Are they finally bringing QD OLED to the 83" size this year???
That was a great info dump. Awesome vid!
So cool. Now why would you f this up with matte coating on your tv?
They never looked great in matted screen.
Can you show new TCL qm6k TV because they are really great for an affordable price.
Same price as the much better QM8 2024
@langstonbelin QM6k has much better response time.
It seems like there are very few gaming monitors at CES this year compared to last year?
I was really hoping for a nice new 21 by 9 gaming monitor! :-/
Why have the QD-OLED TV brightness increases not translated to QD-OLED monitor brightness increases? Still seeing the peak 1000 and 250 nit full screen brightness there after 3 years.
So how good can it performed from having burning issues?
Also, please make glossy QD-OLED TV's at 55-65" for everyone that they can have.. Coming out other QD-OLED TV's by only 85-165" is ridiculous in my book.
yeah but why cant it be same top brightness at any window size? would it exceed the usual 15A outlet? maybe god forbids adding heatsinks to screens? I never see this addressed
You didnt ask them why not 83 inch qd oled?
I don't think it's happening this year, otherwise all of UA-cam would be plastered with videos titled like: QD Oled just got bigger and better, etc.
Because the panel is not done at that size. Most likely just stupid expensive…
So is the G5 still the "best OLED by a landslide" as stated by your previous video?
That was borderline clickbait
Both LG and Samsung's premium TVs are gonna be amazing and picking the better at this stage is pretty trivial; I would just buy whichever has the better price in your region, or compare their other properties like the software experience, build quality etc.
I think it just goes that LG is still used for calibrating and professional color stuff
Is there coming anything to 32” monitors?
And if they go to 600 nits or even more?
where are the 8K monitor?
165hz and very high nits that's promising
Samsung and LG are putting exciting competition this year.
What will b largest size made available-at least 83”??
They have a 5K OLED listed on their roadmap (seen in the AVforums Samsung interview).
I wish they would just give us 37" 5K right now (same PPI as 27" 4K).
the new panel only for the s95 model ??
First good video. Well done!
Please ask them to put a display port on these TVs, at 160hz + no console is going to take advantage of that and these panels can support up to 500hz.
Not gonna hapen. They wanna sell $4000 tiny monitor instead to those wanting to have DP!
Will there be monitors this year with this panel? Or it's only for TV lineup this year?
I had hoped for more brightness in the gaming monitor.
Please confirm if the samsung s95f tv supports WiFi 7
Samsung displays always look great…fix the processing so that you can compete with the likes of Sony and LG. Most people are still watching 720p, 1080i, 1080p. It is your job to make these inferior resolutions that we are still stuck using, perform flawlessly on your 4k and 8k displays.
You didn't ask if this is actually Gen 4 panel? Or did you ask off camera?
not yo'ur business!!!!!!
It doesn’t matter. Either you buy it or you don’t.
OmG offcourse they use the 4th gen panel for 2025 you gonna buy one ?
@@Creationseed9
How so?
Knowing what is being used is in a product we’re potentially looking to buy is absolutely our business.
@@theendurance
What’s that supposed to mean?
Knowing what is being used is in a product we’re potentially looking to buy absolutely does matter.
Its this or the G5. Im coming from an LG C9 at 800nits peak brightness so either one will be awesome.
Connor I need the price for the ASUS PG27UCDM! Please get the Info!!!!
never mind 42" a 38 Ultra wide 4k please Samsung @420hz
Some other tv guys are reporting on youtube that the QD-OLED 83 Inch is not happening. Can anyone shed some light on this? I am bummed out if it is true!
Please if you own a QD OLED remove the Anti Glare Film. Glossy QD OLED is amazing and no more scratches it is glass.
That's what I'm waiting for but at 55".
@@Leolocs_35 they have them in 55
Do not do matte panel coating, do not do it, I use 65S95B
all that matters is brightness at D65. Not this vivid crap.
Be quiet you
2200 nits @ 10% is impressive if true.
Is true, he never lied and I test with modAP1023 all their GENs
And a bit more between 2400 same like LG G5 series
Tvs are really at END GAME
Yeah, once OLEDs hit around 1000 nits highlights and 200 nits plus for full screen there is only little improvements to be made. Main ones being near black handling could be better (it either crushes or lifts the shadow detail making dithering necessary and has less colour in dark scenes with QD-OLEDs), less ABL, brighter for High APL scenes, motion, DSE. Since OLED already has the best viewing angles with the best contrast, sharpness, clarity, motion and less DSE. We just need brighter per pixel displays and better motion handling or tech. That can get away from the sample and hold method which causes jerkiness, when the camera pans while watching content or playing games. CRT and Plasmas didn't suffer from as bad motion clarity problems as todays displays, they could definitely improve on that.
Did you see the 40 inch 4k ultrawide oled? The g7 has 180hz as well omg end game for me fml!
its not oled, sad life
Pitch dark room means they didn't fix the magenta glow in lit rooms, still using triangle pixel structure which means this is bad news for computer monitors. None of this is good news for monitors.
Where is the 83 inch panel?? Come on, Samsung. Some people want bigger than 77 inches.
What do you want this for ?? To perceive individuals pixels?😂 bc no content uses 8K yet and 4k on a 83inch screen would look trash haha
@@Undersnow243 Haha haha...no, 4K on an 83 inch screen does NOT look like trash...haha haha
Probably a small market for it? Most people buy the 55" I think, then 65", then the 75-77"....83-85" would have even smaller sales than the 75- 77". And since they cost more than an LCD of the same size, it's most likely a tiny market for large OLEDs. And to manufacturer them would take even more R&D that might not be worth it for them, at least for now. Remember OLEDs are more expensive for a reason, more can go wrong while printing so many sub-pixels (8.1 million pixels x 4 sub-pixels per pixel plus Colour Filters or 8.1 million blue sub-pixels for QD-OLED plus Quantum Dot layer, which means they should be cheaper than WOLEDs) and the larger the panel the more failures and the panels need to be binned......or recut into smaller ones maybe?
Very impressive nit figures, but are they at Filmmaker or Dynamic (Samsung's Vivid) mode?
Would also have asked if they're working on the purple tint at all, or if it's so innate (light scattering from QDs and all that) that it can't be changed in the foreseeable future.
To me, ambient lit black levels and static image burn-in are the main 2 concerns I have with QD-OLED. WOLED has amazing blacks even in a dim room, and a longer/better track record at mitigating permanent image retention. QD-OLED has much more color saturation headroom but it doesn't come to use in a majority of real-world content, while pure blacks in a lit room definitely do.
Oh and Samsung has also had hiccups with their TV software; the TV OS experience would've been worth asking about as well.
All of them are at D65. S95D with mods AP1023 can reach 3150 nits at 2% APL.
Let me guess another panel lottery this year?
Where is the 83” QD-OLED?
It didnt make it sadly, was false news, but it is using the g5 4 stack oled possibly, plus mla on top which lg itself doesnt even have, so it could be the brightest oled of all.
Dolby Vision this year on Samsung?
Samsung display: start selling these panels.
Samsung electronics ruins your panels.
Kinda funny how u say to every new displays that they are wild 🤦♀️
Matte + 10 warranty claims per year = samsung
I just put it together that The display guy is graphically challenged' evil twin.
S95F lost because it used a matte screen. The 2025 winner is already LG G5
Absolutely not! Samsung absolutely ruined their tv lineup by slapping all their tv panels with a matte finish. It distorts the picture quality that you’d expect from a premium tv. What a shame. The least they could have done is give us the option to choose between a gloss and matte finish.
Samsung Electronics did that. Sony could buy from Samsung Display.
he mentioned the tint lmao
if they can hit 400nits+ on 100% window on big TVs, surely they can do 400 or even 500nits full white screen on 27, 32 inch monitors no? i hope they will be out this year
It depends, the difference is cooling. A big TV has lots of area to spread the heat so that it doesn’t burn or overheat, otherwise we could have seen TV like brightness in monitors long ago.
@@Javier64691 this. Smaller monitor/ tv sizes have less space to dissipate the heat.
@@Javier64691
Phones are much more smaller and can be even brighter
what are you doing in here man haha. When is the next Blinding Lights?
Noup. Not gonna come to monitors…
It is brighter, outperform blah blah blah... what about the quality control ? Ive never seen flimsier tv that bend like hell like the s90d... Black stuff coming out from the top back bezel, uneven ag coating etc etc🙄
Wait for the first update from Samsung 😂😏
Samsung: QD-OLED is superior to WOLED
Also Samsung: our 83" WOLED is every bit as good as the smaller sized QD-OLED's 🤷🏼♂️
You are mixing up companies that share a name. Samsung Display, which makes QD-OLED panels, would say the first. Samsung Electronics, which makes TVs and buys panels from many companies, would say the second.
@@jnvivianIt's funny how you are trying to defend this bs from Samsung. They are even not telling which panel is in which TV in Europe.
@@NhNeoN88 I am not trying to defend Samsung Electronics. That company is being dodgy about QD-OLEDs and WOLEDs, maybe due to contractual requirements from LG Display which makes WOLEDs which have been inferior and probably required that in order to sell WOLED panels to Samsung Electronics. Samsung Display appears to have clean hands, but Samsung Electronics has unclean hands.
LG Display’s new 4-stack WOLED panels which replace the wideband yellow layer from its 3-stack WOLED panels with red and green layers should greatly improve color purity compared to previous WOLEDs, but still dilute colors with white at the highest brightnesses. 3-stack WOLED panels use color filters to extract red and green from the wideband yellow layer, but the resulting red and green are going to have some yellow mixed in. The other two layers in 3-stack WOLED panels are blue layers. Maybe that could improve the 83 inch OLED TVs.
At least 8000 nit on 1% window.
4000 nits @ 8900k
you forgot to ask him about glossy. the new s95f is all ''anti-glare'' ugly matte
whatever, the gaming companies make it glossy when they turn it into a monitor
cute as hell in that lanyard
Gayyy 😂
brightness is kinda overhyped, it’s already more than enough
I’m one of only a few which agree with you. I have the Z95A. Dynamic mode I don’t like one bit. Over brightness is not natural to me.
No it is not enough…
They will nerf it with a software update.
if this has a dolby vision.............
Great. The TV can't even handle motion on their own video 🤦
Matte or Glosy ?!
All matte .. Really every TV from Samsung has a matt coating this year.. 😂🤦🤷
neat
The 300th like
Panel lottery again?
I prefer Hisense
Is it me or the last year model Colors look better and the next one slightly washed out??
That’s just the camera…it was exposed for the last year model so the new model is overexposed (since it’s brighter).
@1:24 Just look at all those blown out colours, the blue sky is completely white, the blue jeans are almost white on the left hand side. The colours are un-natural and blown to pieces.
Never judge an HDR display based on an SDR camera pointed at it especially one that likely doesn’t have its exposure really dialed in and is causing clipping.
@@Reallynotnick Ok well we the viewers are viewing what your camera is seeing, whether or not you have correct camera settings becomes irrelevant when there are two screens being shown in the same video footage and last years model's colours look better than the 2025 over exposed blown out colours. Begs the question of which lens is telling the truth?
I guess you dont understand cameras not sure why you would expect to see the real panel colors on a youtube video, get real bro.
He is correct and others completely wrong yikes sorry guys. It's definitely blowing color out, esp the reds. Thing is the definition of brighter is literally more white and less saturated lol. Saturatuon has to with greys and purity, BRIGHTNESS has to with how much black and white there is meaning adding white equals brighter. By definition saying its brighter and therefore whiter also says less saturated. Interestingly increasing saturatuon at equal luminance does appears brighter but nonetheless is equal luminance.
@@daz3434babsolutely correct it is an issue yet unnecessary. By definition brighter is more white saturation is greys. So if you are certain its a brighter version of a color then it has more white meaning desaturated!
LG so: Hold my beer!
had to go back to 0:17 and watch again, the new pane is on the right and looks like trash, it is way too bright and over blown isnt it?
Camera exposure not the panel read above comments bro
Yeah… camera problem.
My TV is too bright already. I don't need any more nits.
what do you need ?
@444chroma to be honest, nothing. Volume leveler for music and action scenes? 🤣
You have caliprated your TV wrongly if it is too bright!
I'm reminded every time oled gets brighter by the idiots that claimed the technology was inherently too dark, at a dead end and not capable of getting brighter anymore. The last argument I had about that was just prior to the... s95b.
I'm now laughing my ass of since one of them just got an Oled without even realising it was one and here is the next gen just waiting to happen.
т.е. я в мониторе IPS до 50% убавляю яркость потому что глаза жжёт, а они всё больше яркости добавляют, зачем? чтобы я убавлял яркость до 10%? попахивает бредом... лучше бы выгорание излечили. про LG новый что-нибудь рассказали бы поподробней, а то предыдущее видео было как-то ни о чём
f all qd technology, bye lol
Why anyone want more nits in TV Oled? More nits = more burn in.
Does not exist have my S95B for 3 years no burn-in here but i take also measure like using a screensaver and hide the taskbar as using it for pc monitor
@@wblebonAre you an equivalent of a flat Earth believer? Burn-in is a fact.
It is a fact, and it worsens with brightness. Moreover, all those adjustments are just a makeshift solution exaggerated by marketing to sell the product.
Or are you just coping because your purchase is at the end of its life?
I have a second OLED TV , this one has no burn in in over 3 years@@ilmistico90
@@ilmistico90 as i said after 3 years of using qd-oled no burn-in and still going strong then don't buy oled go for led instead if afraid of this lol 😂
I think Samsung going to beat LG g5 TVs
Shiddd who's going to be able to Afford them 😂😂
Bro why didnt you call out the matte finish smh come on mane