I really enjoy the informative Top 5 videos! And I appreciate the extra mile you go with the historical information and the cinematics. Really good list. Personally, I like the cost efficient tanks like the Kanonenjagdpanzer, too. But the Leos overall are the best tanks because they can transport beer on the barrel without spilling it :D From playing I think the T80s are incredibly good and I fear them, too :D
@@sd_league completely agree. Bout time their T-80s look the part. Always hated how they looked in Wargame. Such an iconic vehicle just looked like dog shit.
I really thought I was the only one who played the BMP-3 and was genuinely surprised at how they performed, so imagine my shock seeing it be number 1 lmao
I agree with pretty much all of these, but i dont understand the lack of Chieftain MK10/11 when compared to the N.G Abrams. 3 more pen, no reserve trait and 5pts cheaper. In exchange the N.G Abrams gets better MGs 5% accuracy and 9 fire rate instead of 7. Id take the 3pen more any day especially with the amount of armour you see and the suppression on INF that tank main gun provides. The reserve trait is also such a turn off and with the machine guns tbh if there in use your tank isnt in a good place. I think the reason why you forgot about about the Chieftain mk10/11 is its divisions aren't great but it is one of a few standouts in an otherwise lackluster divisions. You should do under rated units by nation or div, ones you rarely see but when you see them you know there a problem. Extra points if you include mid units that become great at better veterancy or units that on paper suck but in certain situations just perform every time. As a brit main my example would be the airmobile gungroup at 2 vet these things are excellent in urban and forests. Along with the striker, 80pts for the ability to scare tanks at 2625m is actually pretty damn useful and with the 5 clip it is very good at being scary despite the accuracy only being 45%, but if it hits 338 suppression is very good at slowing down the bigger tanks and that's not even considering the 23 pen.
there is a thing that i hate about this game, the vehicles are VERY badly modeled especially BMP's Bradleys and all 30mm's the number of innacurate thing are insane and yet they add prototypes... i could also talk about the French which is the biggest impacted nation like the fact that T80BV as more range with 125mm ATGM than a missile carrier that fire 152mm ATGM..
The Tow2 is great, but it's pretty expensive and has rather low survivability for it. Using it in fights vs other ifvs or inf can often be cost inefficient.
Bmp3 is way way better against infantry thanks to it's long range 100mm and has a way higher survivability thanks to 5 frontal armor. It wins every 1v1 vs other ifvs. Bradley doesn't do that.
@@sd_league Lets just agree to disagree as bmp3 doesn’t always win as that gun feels like it miss every shoot and 18 on atgm is way less threatening then 23 on some targets while 5 armor helps only agains non-atgm ifvs and the lowest dmg infantry at.
1889 Sovjet Red Army and equipment was in a different state then the same equipment 30 years later in a combat with completely different weapon systems. 1989 had not Javelins and Small Drones. Its kinda like saying "Mark V tanks were trash in WW1 because they really suffered in 1945 when the Germans used a few of them in desperate defense of Berlin".
@@sd_leaguewell he does have a small point, like bmps paper thin armor and poor reliability of loading ammunition. Like the T series of tanks in this game are over performing when compared to their IRL counterparts,and let’s not forget how corrupt the soviet government was at that time. Also shouldn’t US have access to m829a2 and a3 for countering Soviet heavy ERA sense the the Soviets decided to field bmp-3 earlier?.
Community Top 5 Units votes:
docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfk5yAPQAjsTqW1HovgPDdxUzaeUM58E_7bAHepVtL-NNEqng/viewform?usp=sf_link
Really like you taking some time to explain some of the history behind the gear, a nice touch.
Glad you like it!
I really enjoy the informative Top 5 videos! And I appreciate the extra mile you go with the historical information and the cinematics. Really good list. Personally, I like the cost efficient tanks like the Kanonenjagdpanzer, too. But the Leos overall are the best tanks because they can transport beer on the barrel without spilling it :D From playing I think the T80s are incredibly good and I fear them, too :D
I absolutely love the new models for the T-80s.
Oh yeah the new models of all units are really hot, but the T80BVs are pretty much top tier!
@@sd_league completely agree. Bout time their T-80s look the part. Always hated how they looked in Wargame. Such an iconic vehicle just looked like dog shit.
I really thought I was the only one who played the BMP-3 and was genuinely surprised at how they performed, so imagine my shock seeing it be number 1 lmao
I agree with pretty much all of these, but i dont understand the lack of Chieftain MK10/11 when compared to the N.G Abrams. 3 more pen, no reserve trait and 5pts cheaper. In exchange the N.G Abrams gets better MGs 5% accuracy and 9 fire rate instead of 7.
Id take the 3pen more any day especially with the amount of armour you see and the suppression on INF that tank main gun provides. The reserve trait is also such a turn off and with the machine guns tbh if there in use your tank isnt in a good place.
I think the reason why you forgot about about the Chieftain mk10/11 is its divisions aren't great but it is one of a few standouts in an otherwise lackluster divisions.
You should do under rated units by nation or div, ones you rarely see but when you see them you know there a problem. Extra points if you include mid units that become great at better veterancy or units that on paper suck but in certain situations just perform every time. As a brit main my example would be the airmobile gungroup at 2 vet these things are excellent in urban and forests. Along with the striker, 80pts for the ability to scare tanks at 2625m is actually pretty damn useful and with the 5 clip it is very good at being scary despite the accuracy only being 45%, but if it hits 338 suppression is very good at slowing down the bigger tanks and that's not even considering the 23 pen.
Speed, and RoF are quite big setbacks, I considered them but decided against them.
2s25m is basically crippled T-80UD with worse accuracy
I am fairly new. Is there a way to tell if a vehicle can use smoke on the unit card?
unfortunatlly not at the moment. :(
Hopefully gets changed before launch.
you shouldve left the IFVs out of this and made a separate top 5 for IFVs
Great video as always! Keep em coming))
Love this series!!
there is a thing that i hate about this game, the vehicles are VERY badly modeled especially BMP's Bradleys and all 30mm's the number of innacurate thing are insane and yet they add prototypes...
i could also talk about the French which is the biggest impacted nation like the fact that T80BV as more range with 125mm ATGM than a missile carrier that fire 152mm ATGM..
Thanks for the history lessons too.
My favorite tank is the leo 95pts one cause of the stabilizer and availability.
Excellent security tanks and when used to back up 2a3 or 2a4
Damage is nice for the price too
I am suprised bradley is not here - its best ifv by the mile.
The Tow2 is great, but it's pretty expensive and has rather low survivability for it. Using it in fights vs other ifvs or inf can often be cost inefficient.
@@sd_league doesn’t bmp-3 cost even more and its just weaker bradley? Yet bmp 3 made it into your list.
Bmp3 is way way better against infantry thanks to it's long range 100mm and has a way higher survivability thanks to 5 frontal armor. It wins every 1v1 vs other ifvs. Bradley doesn't do that.
@@sd_league Lets just agree to disagree as bmp3 doesn’t always win as that gun feels like it miss every shoot and 18 on atgm is way less threatening then 23 on some targets while 5 armor helps only agains non-atgm ifvs and the lowest dmg infantry at.
It helps against all Milan ifvs and against all auto anno s
Pixel Soviets so scary but don't you think Eugen should start using actual combat performance, cuz BMP's and T series tanks sux.
Ukraine showed NATO vehicles are garbage, Bradleys and leopards in particular are useless by your logic
Bruh wtf you talking about 😂😂
@@rafaelrmaierThey're salty that they lost to Pact, in-game. 😂
1889 Sovjet Red Army and equipment was in a different state then the same equipment 30 years later in a combat with completely different weapon systems. 1989 had not Javelins and Small Drones.
Its kinda like saying "Mark V tanks were trash in WW1 because they really suffered in 1945 when the Germans used a few of them in desperate defense of Berlin".
@@sd_leaguewell he does have a small point, like bmps paper thin armor and poor reliability of loading ammunition.
Like the T series of tanks in this game are over performing when compared to their IRL counterparts,and let’s not forget how corrupt the soviet government was at that time.
Also shouldn’t US have access to m829a2 and a3 for countering Soviet heavy ERA sense the the Soviets decided to field bmp-3 earlier?.