Volleyball referee training! Out, In, Touch, Ball in the net

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @DavidNitzscheBell
    @DavidNitzscheBell 11 місяців тому +1

    1:25 the line judge does not always see the block touch. Line judges are told by the 1st ref to only call a touch if we are absolutely 100% certain, otherwise, just show "in" or "out". The 1st referee will use our signal to inform their decision, but the 1st ref will primarily look at the 2nd ref to help determine if there was a touch or not.

  • @utahgtrlee1367
    @utahgtrlee1367 3 роки тому +3

    Case 8 should have been a net call on #16 from Brazil.

  • @mehdisovitch
    @mehdisovitch 5 років тому +10

    In case 14 I think it's ball in, there is no ball in the net for a spike, it's only for serve.

    • @mickybadia
      @mickybadia 5 років тому

      I thought so too.
      unless it was because the guy went to touch the net afterwards, but I'd say that was out of play...

  • @evanmitchell1110
    @evanmitchell1110 7 років тому +10

    Thank you. I have reffing tomorrow for my first time and this helped me prepare :)

    • @JJ-pp6tz
      @JJ-pp6tz 2 роки тому

      dude same. I have to be there at 7:30am and its 8:30pm and im kinda worried. I know its 5 years ago but how did it go?

    • @evanmitchell1110
      @evanmitchell1110 2 роки тому

      @@JJ-pp6tz haha I wish I remembered better. I think I ended a game too early but it wasn't a big deal and otherwise it went well. Trust me once you get up there and start watching the match you'll get in the zone and you'll do great.

    • @JJ-pp6tz
      @JJ-pp6tz 2 роки тому +1

      @@evanmitchell1110 Thank you, man! I honestly feel better after reading that! I'm still studying like crazy trying to make sure I don't mess it up. I will let you know how it goes tomorrow.

    • @evanmitchell1110
      @evanmitchell1110 2 роки тому

      @@JJ-pp6tz Good luck man!

  • @sandroadler3607
    @sandroadler3607 Місяць тому

    Case 6 is really hard to tell because it looks like the Block on the Left from the left team ( if u are the first referee) touched the net with his body before the ball landed on the ground

  • @jameshudson6902
    @jameshudson6902 2 роки тому +1

    something you could maybe do next time is to have a replay where it shows the case in slow motion

  • @marionstade2174
    @marionstade2174 8 років тому +9

    Thank you for creating this video. It is very helpful. Do you have any more?

  • @suum52
    @suum52 5 років тому +1

    i want to see less obvious calls i.e. at the net; (or did the ball, attacker, or blocker cause net to move?)

  • @standyer7482
    @standyer7482 7 років тому +10

    "Appopriot"?

    • @nikitachoudhary253
      @nikitachoudhary253 2 місяці тому

      Don't diss the guy 😢. He is trying to teach us something.

  • @emirukitty
    @emirukitty 6 років тому

    case5 is passing the centerline

  • @rajsandhu1422
    @rajsandhu1422 Рік тому

    Good video but there was no signal of double, carry, back line foul, it could have been more helpful

  • @zoop34
    @zoop34 5 років тому

    In case 18, it was called out. Why would it not be considered a "touch?"

    • @alexkearney9007
      @alexkearney9007 5 років тому +1

      when the ball hits any obstruction, excluding the net but including the antenna it is called out

  • @BruceKasoka
    @BruceKasoka 5 років тому +4

    What is Appoppriot? That is way too InAppoppriot!

  • @tinkujangra8019
    @tinkujangra8019 6 років тому

    Nice videos

  • @DavidNitzscheBell
    @DavidNitzscheBell 11 місяців тому

    Why? Why? Why? "Appropriate" "Read" and you should show the hand signals the 1st referee gives every time. And, why, WHY did you show 20 seconds of nothing during case 14 (6:30)? Honestly, it added nothing at all to the purpose of the video to see Sidão wiping off sweat, taking the ball and preparing to serve.
    Oh, and you're wrong for case 14. Russia was nowhere near the net during the attack. Brazil was at the net to block, but as Brazil won the point, it clearly wasn't a net or penetration under the net. it was just a simple "ball in" call, because the attack was in the net and hit the ground.
    And you forgot to make chapters for the first two cases; they are included in the Intro.

  • @she543
    @she543 4 роки тому

    Appopriot ampota HAHAHAHAHAHA