Logistic Regression Introduction with Tutorial in JMP

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 лип 2024
  • If you are at a university other than UCSD and have found this or any of my other videos to be useful, please do me a favor and send me a note at ProfessorParris@gmail.com indicating your university affiliation and which videos you've found useful.
    Thank you! - Dr. Julian Parris
    ----
    Lecture on Logistic Regression and Tutorial on Simple Binary Logistic Regression In JMP
    Recording from a live lecture 02/16/2011
    Datasets available at: tinyurl.com/3buyp7e

КОМЕНТАРІ • 33

  • @johnheisler8143
    @johnheisler8143 11 років тому

    Sincerely grateful for you time and effort in putting this together. Effective and intuitive communication of often muddled information.

  • @leeny42
    @leeny42 12 років тому

    Outstanding. Best explanation of logistic regression I've heard. I especially appreciated the frequent reminders/examples of what each equation/variable actually means. Excellent tone, too.

  • @claywolfe1
    @claywolfe1 12 років тому

    Thanks. Great teaching method/skill. Complicated concepts made easier with real life examples and discussion around practical applications. More excitement in the delivery than most teachers.

  • @mrpapparappa
    @mrpapparappa 13 років тому

    God bless you for these posts; a very satisfied PhD candidate from Winnipeg :)!!!

  • @CosmoKadampa
    @CosmoKadampa 11 років тому

    Thanks for this video! I've been looking for a good reference to refresh my memory on the basics of logistic regression, interpretations etc., and this is the best one that I've seen so far.

  • @nichellejasper41
    @nichellejasper41 4 роки тому

    Excellent video! Extremely helpful. It helped me put a lot into perspective! Great job!

  • @fuckooo
    @fuckooo 11 років тому

    Very good, very clear exposition. Well done.

  • @juliannajollyrenzi48
    @juliannajollyrenzi48 6 років тому

    This is great--really helpful! Thank you.

  • @psyolia
    @psyolia 5 років тому

    Great video, very helpful and nicely explained, Thank you so much

  • @joshsteh
    @joshsteh 12 років тому

    Thanks!!! another very satisfied PhD student from BC Why can't my teachers explain it so clearly :(

  • @gloriahoffman8513
    @gloriahoffman8513 6 років тому

    super helpful!!! wish you around when I took stats as an undergrad.

  • @siciidsacad9346
    @siciidsacad9346 10 років тому

    thank you so much from your help, i got more and more important how you explain,
    thanks again and again

  • @debendrashrestha1
    @debendrashrestha1 8 років тому

    THANK YOU, GREAT LECTURE

  • @shaibismailomade7974
    @shaibismailomade7974 11 років тому

    Thank you very much. I really do have a wonderful lecture. It will help me a great deal

  • @aghasemi4u
    @aghasemi4u 12 років тому

    Thank you. very clear explanation.

  • @ProfessorParrisStats
    @ProfessorParrisStats  12 років тому

    @mrpapparappa You're so welcome!

  • @UncertainMind
    @UncertainMind 11 років тому

    I found it - if we want to interpret the beta estimates of a nominal effect the same way as a continuous effect (i.e., e^estimate = OR), the "nominal" variable needs to be0 or 1 and changed to be a continuous variable. Otherwise, JMP treats it differently.

  • @jojito29
    @jojito29 12 років тому

    Thank you!! :)

  • @driedtoast12
    @driedtoast12 5 років тому

    At 32:22, when you show how to figure out odds ratio for c unit change (instead of a single unit, or the entire range), how do you calculate the 95% CI using this technique? thanks

  • @UncertainMind
    @UncertainMind 11 років тому

    Thanks! Obviously with over 20 000 views your explanations are very appreciated.
    Any pointers on how to interpret the beta estimate when the independent variable is nominal?

  • @ericwatson5840
    @ericwatson5840 10 років тому

    Great!

  • @ProfessorParrisStats
    @ProfessorParrisStats  12 років тому

    @jojito29 My pleasure!

  • @guyrich6467
    @guyrich6467 11 років тому

    Great demo for using JMP. Thank you. Can you tell me the name of the textbook you're using?

  • @asanyal296
    @asanyal296 5 років тому

    Very interesting presentation - thanks. Does JMP recognize standard SAS code? Could you write some PROC LOGISTIC commands in a window or does it all have to be through this drag-drop GUI?

    • @JulianParris
      @JulianParris 5 років тому

      JMP has its own scripting language (JSL), so you would need jsl not sas code to execute a jmp analysis via code. JMP can run SAS code if you have a connection to a SAS server, but whatever you run is processed by the SAS server, not JMP. For the most part JMP is driven very effectivley via the GUI so it's not necessary to rely on JSL unless you're scripting for reproducibility or custom workflows.

  • @albertbeccu
    @albertbeccu 12 років тому

    This might be a stupid question, but I've got some trouble figuring out where those probabilities used in the odds still come from (the once denoted pi-hat).
    Regarding the probability of an outcome to the model. Would you first create a regular Linear probability model, with robust stanards, and use those for the (pi / 1 - pi) formula? (i.e the LPM gives you the pi values, and you'd use those in the logit?

  • @Anderspish
    @Anderspish 12 років тому

    /surrender Wow, where did you learn all this? Great video. You should add your teaching information in the info box. I'd totally take this class.

  • @theboyAD52
    @theboyAD52 4 роки тому

    Can you change the regressor unit from 1 unit to being 10 units

  • @jiedou4473
    @jiedou4473 11 років тому

    which software do use to get logistic regression?

  • @Francis-xd4gg
    @Francis-xd4gg 11 років тому

    Try running R Studio

  • @sgpleasure
    @sgpleasure 8 років тому

    Is this JMP Pro? Or basic JMP

  • @CosmoKadampa
    @CosmoKadampa 11 років тому

    You should do one for R as well. :)