I had to keep pausing and going back to get a clear understanding Coach . You talk really fast its hard to keep up but i love to study . Cheers @@saulocostapoker
i dont call riv shoves much, i shove on rivs when I know they're weak. i dont call down recs with big bets on riv they always have it . They only semibluff high equity hands on flop and turn and if they dont hit they give up. They have no heart - Tony G @@luisbenites4825
@@jordanlee3078you guys who have english as your first language are terrible at understand inglish! Give the Guy creds for his absolute amazing good english for be from Brazil instead and say Thanks for the free content he share
Pleasure to watch such perfectly made videos. Good tempo, very clean and good looking montage, difficult to comprehend stuff is presented in a clear way - kudos to you!
Another difference between me and a 40KNL crusher is that I play on NL10. I am not sure if calling down in the slow play line xc flop, cr turn, push river with top pair lousy kicker on a pretty dry board would be such a good idea in NL10. My threshold would be A2. I think this play is more a don't try this at home, all you see in this video is done by professionals kind of play. From what limit on would you think this should be a standard calldown?
So this kind of play applys for extremely experienced Poker players. But what happens when my oponnents plays are not as close to GTO? - Their range might be "off" - Their bet might be "off" - They might bet instead of checking Anyways thank you very much for the content - I especially liked the consideration of blocking cards on the turn and the resulting decision-making of the villain.
What limit do you think they start overbluff x2.5/3.5 pot size bet on river , beacuse most of regs nl 100 or less , just usually give up too much on River 3barell , especcialy when they overbet turn
i would call too... so this means i belongs to this elit league too. Good to know. Let's analize the situation step by step: 1. Pre flop actions: Malinowski: bet - Barak: call. 2. Flop two high cards (favoring pre flop agressor, potentially having more strong combos like: pairs: AK, two pairs: AQ, sets: AAA,QQQ), the board is dry, not connected, no flush there, etc. Malinowski here checks back. This action in poker on a board like this can have two meaning: I have nothing (underpair in hand, or second pair with the K) or I have a monster hand (at least two pairs or sets). 3. River is a 6. It's kind of a brick. Malinowski this time bets. This represents most of the cases a pair of A or still a monster hand targeting some flush draws, weaker pairs (K), non believer weak hands. Barak raises with a huge overbet. The problem with this raise, at this point it can only target monster hands (AAA,QQQ or AQ). Let's say if instead A the Q would be the spade on the board then you can say this oversized raise targets A high flushes, like AK suited. So this is the first moment when Barak made a huge mistake, cause his story already stinks. Malinowski understand this and obviously calls. 4. River: Barak not stops, he goes again with a huge overbet. So at this point he has to unberstand, if his opponent called on the turn, then he is much more likely falls into the monster hands category. Flush not get there. So the only hand he can target with this overbet is AQ with a 222,333,666 set... but against AAA,QQQ he is fked up. So the only hand you would make this size of overbet is a straight with a 45 in your hand... as you only target monster hands AAA,QQQ,AQ to called. (with AA or QQ in hand you have 2+2=4 combos, with AQ hand you have 3+3 = 6 combos, but you also have to consider if you bet smaller then AK, Ax would call and AAA,QQQ for sure raises and also AQ very likely raises) So here what Malinowski had to consider: the only scenario where he can be busted is if Barak on the turn used his equity (note: with an open ended straight draw action would make more sense) improving to a gut shutter and on river he get lucky hitting the straight and now he just targets his possible monster combos and as above explained if he really have a monster combo, but also weaker hands in his range, then why this Barak guy targeting only monster hands? Why he not pretends he is weaker to induce a raise from him or with weaker hands at least get called and payed out. Why he is not scared of monster combos he can very likely have? Nobody playing poker with charts, and probabilistics calculations in his head. Some basic math is neccesary, like range theory, know your outs probabilities, blockers, hand combination probabliities, etc. Only cheaters who are using programs rely on this advanced math staff, billions of hands data analysis, etc. This is why live poker is the only clean way to play poker (i know cheaters can be also found there).
Last hand I think I am very close call A8 there.. barack wisbrod should 3bet AA QQ AQ AK so cant find so very many combos that beat us (cant imagine he play AJ or A10 Like this…
This video is great bro. I spent an hour going back and forth to fully get. I play NL50 and I can definetely tell ppl overfold against overbets, and check raises OTT are nutted for sure
Forget the bet size..trust the boards and what you got. Theres no top pair EVER folding HEADSUP with that board texture. Its actually a very easy call.
Yea was half exepcting a twist ending where he made the correct call but happened to run into it, with 3rd reason being he can cope better than us with the variance.
thanks for the vid, maybe in HU this might be true, but BvB IPO I noticed if you get XR on the turn IPO, they have more nuts then GTO, what's the data on this?
The data displayed is actually from 6-max. Both of these players are 6-max players originally so I thought 6-max data would be more reflective of their strategies
Can overbet strategy be exploited by folding many times and calling with good hands? in this A8 hand, Wiktor loses 3,2k or wins 27,5k. He can patiently fold 5 or 6 times while calling with top 15% of his bet-call range on the turn, and still be in profit.
Yeah the theoretically approved play is to fold 82% of his range by the river. He doesn't have to find calls with hands like A8. But he did because he thought the other guy was bluffing too much
Thanks Tom. What matters is the effective bet. Barak's stack is much bigger than Wiktor's, so what counts is Wiktor's stack. Its a 24.4k bet in to a 6.45k pot
@@saulocostapoker Dont get me wrong i think u are a very positive force on the poker community i love ur yt videos find it educative and very entertaining and i think its great to help micro/low stakes grinders. The only thing i take issue is when u infer u still are a part of the highstakes grinders with videos such as "HighStakes Pro Reacts To 100NL Hands" i never seen a sample of u beating high stakes (10k+).
I see mate. Im definitely not a highstakes grinder, you're right about that. That video title does seem misleading in retrospect, I'll change it. Thanks for the feedback! I hope you still got something from this video! A lot of effort went into it 😀
When you look at solvers like this humans could never memorise all of this, my only worry is RTAs that make poker obsolete online, p.s....High risk tolerance joins 100 200 blinds online.....3 hours later......COSTA!!!!!
Fun/challenge, to hold the table or because the table broke and they forgot to leave. Would be surprised if they thought they have an edge over the other
Does me aggressively liking tons of comments help you with the algorithm? If so, every time you release a video, I'll smash in a few likes on comments. Keep doing what you're doing. 👍✌️
Making decisions on an infinite horizon seems smart. So over infinite time my decision is valid with the maths. Ok cool but don’t I die really soon bro?
The newest strategy no one is doing is playing small stakes on a new account against yourself and making the stats look like DOG water on purpose. Then using that shit stat account to bet big money against these AI and pro players who will look at your profile and open their ranges… Easy - free money glitch
💲New FREE Event on November 2024 ➝ The Ultimate Guide on How To Become a Cash Game Crusher. Click the link to know more: bit.ly/cmswyoutube2
This is, without a doubt, one of the greatest poker theory videos out there... Parabéns!
Thank you!!
Insane how you can assemble all this knowledge in 13 minutes and make it so comprehensible. Thank you and Congrats! ❤
Obrigado meu querido! ❤️
Plot twist:
Wiktor thought to himself “Fuck this Barak guy”
lmao could definitely be the case 🤣
Insane quality for this video mate, congratulations
Thank you brother ❤️
Top Valeu!
i was studying this video for 1.5 hours. I wanted to make sure i understood exactly what you were teaching. Thanks alot coach !! Awesome stuff!!
Damn, thats a lot of watching haha awesome my friend, hope it was time well invested
I had to keep pausing and going back to get a clear understanding Coach . You talk really fast its hard to keep up but i love to study . Cheers @@saulocostapoker
Now time to go and burn the bankroll at the low stakes calling river shoves!
i dont call riv shoves much, i shove on rivs when I know they're weak. i dont call down recs with big bets on riv they always have it . They only semibluff high equity hands on flop and turn and if they dont hit they give up. They have no heart - Tony G @@luisbenites4825
@@luisbenites4825 lmao, me after making a whole chart about overbet spots
📚 Signup to my newsletter to get free advanced strategy tips 👉🏽 saulocosta.poker/newsletter
Can you clear up what you say at the 6:12 mark. Reg tolerance? Rich tolerance? I can't quite understand it
Hey man I just subscribed to your newsletter, is there a way to read the older ones?
@@DiamondForevah Yes, go to the signup page and scroll down, the past issues are all there!
@@jordanlee3078you guys who have english as your first language are terrible at understand inglish! Give the Guy creds for his absolute amazing good english for be from Brazil instead and say Thanks for the free content he share
love this strategies with MASIVE overbets, my favourite content so far
Amazing stuff! You explained high level poker in a condensed short video. Hats off.
Glad you liked it!
your newsletter is really DOPE! 👍
Thanks buddy!
You looks like Jose Aldo , a MMA fighter
Yeah, Ive been told that multiple times in the past 😁
@@saulocostapoker just need to get a big scar down your face 😂
more like alex periera😅.. Good thing he wasn't "paulo costa" 😂
Lol.. literally just scrolled past an Aldo post 2vids up announcing his return! Jose Aldo Jr, my top3 all-time fav!
The video editor getting better and better.
Pleasure to watch such perfectly made videos. Good tempo, very clean and good looking montage, difficult to comprehend stuff is presented in a clear way - kudos to you!
Appreciate the feedback mate 🧡
Great analysis. Seems like the metas should shift towards underbluffing and stationing down to counter overbluffing habits?
Amazing video about a topic that I feel is not explored enough--range construction when faced with large overbets.
Another difference between me and a 40KNL crusher is that I play on NL10. I am not sure if calling down in the slow play line xc flop, cr turn, push river with top pair lousy kicker on a pretty dry board would be such a good idea in NL10. My threshold would be A2.
I think this play is more a don't try this at home, all you see in this video is done by professionals kind of play. From what limit on would you think this should be a standard calldown?
Probably 200nl+
Amazing production quality on this one mate, great video!
Thanks Gay Zac!
So this kind of play applys for extremely experienced Poker players.
But what happens when my oponnents plays are not as close to GTO?
- Their range might be "off"
- Their bet might be "off"
- They might bet instead of checking
Anyways thank you very much for the content - I especially liked the consideration of blocking cards on the turn and the resulting decision-making of the villain.
The best poker content. Thank you
Appreciate the compliment 💙
Wow the production value of this video 🔥
Great video! How can I find High stakes to watch streaming?
What limit do you think they start overbluff x2.5/3.5 pot size bet on river , beacuse most of regs nl 100 or less , just usually give up too much on River 3barell , especcialy when they overbet turn
Great video, please add dark mode to your newsletter website :D
That's a great suggestion, thank you
How do you learn to have a high risk tolerance?
i would call too... so this means i belongs to this elit league too. Good to know.
Let's analize the situation step by step:
1. Pre flop actions: Malinowski: bet - Barak: call.
2. Flop two high cards (favoring pre flop agressor, potentially having more strong combos like: pairs: AK, two pairs: AQ, sets: AAA,QQQ), the board is dry, not connected, no flush there, etc.
Malinowski here checks back. This action in poker on a board like this can have two meaning: I have nothing (underpair in hand, or second pair with the K) or I have a monster hand (at least two pairs or sets).
3. River is a 6. It's kind of a brick.
Malinowski this time bets. This represents most of the cases a pair of A or still a monster hand targeting some flush draws, weaker pairs (K), non believer weak hands.
Barak raises with a huge overbet. The problem with this raise, at this point it can only target monster hands (AAA,QQQ or AQ). Let's say if instead A the Q would be the spade on the board then you can say this oversized raise targets A high flushes, like AK suited. So this is the first moment when Barak made a huge mistake, cause his story already stinks. Malinowski understand this and obviously calls.
4. River: Barak not stops, he goes again with a huge overbet. So at this point he has to unberstand, if his opponent called on the turn, then he is much more likely falls into the monster hands category. Flush not get there. So the only hand he can target with this overbet is AQ with a 222,333,666 set... but against AAA,QQQ he is fked up. So the only hand you would make this size of overbet is a straight with a 45 in your hand... as you only target monster hands AAA,QQQ,AQ to called. (with AA or QQ in hand you have 2+2=4 combos, with AQ hand you have 3+3 = 6 combos, but you also have to consider if you bet smaller then AK, Ax would call and AAA,QQQ for sure raises and also AQ very likely raises)
So here what Malinowski had to consider: the only scenario where he can be busted is if Barak on the turn used his equity (note: with an open ended straight draw action would make more sense) improving to a gut shutter and on river he get lucky hitting the straight and now he just targets his possible monster combos and as above explained if he really have a monster combo, but also weaker hands in his range, then why this Barak guy targeting only monster hands? Why he not pretends he is weaker to induce a raise from him or with weaker hands at least get called and payed out. Why he is not scared of monster combos he can very likely have?
Nobody playing poker with charts, and probabilistics calculations in his head. Some basic math is neccesary, like range theory, know your outs probabilities, blockers, hand combination probabliities, etc. Only cheaters who are using programs rely on this advanced math staff, billions of hands data analysis, etc. This is why live poker is the only clean way to play poker (i know cheaters can be also found there).
Getting Good spots (Maximum value spots) and being clutch with your run good. That’s what seperates the great from the good
Last hand I think I am very close call A8 there.. barack wisbrod should 3bet AA QQ AQ AK so cant find so very many combos that beat us (cant imagine he play AJ or A10
Like this…
Excelente el contenido amigo. Great work! Greetings from Ecuador.
This video is great bro. I spent an hour going back and forth to fully get. I play NL50 and I can definetely tell ppl overfold against overbets, and check raises OTT are nutted for sure
Glad you enjoyed!
Forget the bet size..trust the boards and what you got. Theres no top pair EVER folding HEADSUP with that board texture. Its actually a very easy call.
@2cardconfidence style video means beautiful video
👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻 LIMITLESS ❤️
The goat channel
Was expecting set of sixes in the end, nice video as always
Yea was half exepcting a twist ending where he made the correct call but happened to run into it, with 3rd reason being he can cope better than us with the variance.
Judging by the stacks, the thought process must have been either :
Lel, I have top pair, I call
or
He can't have it every time
These are the best players in the world. I think their thought process is a bit more elaborated than that 😄
This is really well done man, kudos
Thank you!
Nice video, nice concepts! Thanks 👍
My pleasure!
thanks for the vid, maybe in HU this might be true, but BvB IPO I noticed if you get XR on the turn IPO, they have more nuts then GTO, what's the data on this?
The data displayed is actually from 6-max. Both of these players are 6-max players originally so I thought 6-max data would be more reflective of their strategies
Excellent video and great editing!
Thank you very much!
I'm gonna do this at my .05/.10 NL online game tonight!
lets goooooo! good luck 😎 pick your opponents carefully though!
Incredible video
Can overbet strategy be exploited by folding many times and calling with good hands? in this A8 hand, Wiktor loses 3,2k or wins 27,5k. He can patiently fold 5 or 6 times while calling with top 15% of his bet-call range on the turn, and still be in profit.
Yeah the theoretically approved play is to fold 82% of his range by the river. He doesn't have to find calls with hands like A8. But he did because he thought the other guy was bluffing too much
What analytics package do you use for range research on h2n3? Is it anything commercially available or something of your own design?
Its custom made mate
These videos are top shelf. One question @4:57 $116K into $6.5K pot seems a lot more than 3.78x pot bet. Am I missing something?
Thanks Tom. What matters is the effective bet. Barak's stack is much bigger than Wiktor's, so what counts is Wiktor's stack. Its a 24.4k bet in to a 6.45k pot
@@saulocostapokerGot it. Thanks for setting me straight.
You haven’t played much heads-up even lower stakes 50-100-200NL+ this is very common x3 x4 overheat bluff show river.
Gracias hermano!!
Ultra good stuff mate !
Thanks bro 💙
shouldnt u crush 40k nl, if u know what they are doing?
That's not a given.
I dont have an interest in being a professional grinder at this point in my life. Im happier running my businesses
@@saulocostapoker Dont get me wrong i think u are a very positive force on the poker community i love ur yt videos find it educative and very entertaining and i think its great to help micro/low stakes grinders. The only thing i take issue is when u infer u still are a part of the highstakes grinders with videos such as "HighStakes Pro Reacts To 100NL Hands" i never seen a sample of u beating high stakes (10k+).
I see mate. Im definitely not a highstakes grinder, you're right about that. That video title does seem misleading in retrospect, I'll change it. Thanks for the feedback!
I hope you still got something from this video! A lot of effort went into it 😀
@@saulocostapoker yeah great video, and super humble response. Keep up the good work, u seem like a terrific guy, hope we can meet irl some day 😄
Don Saulo you are the man!!!
This takes the fun out of poker.
Malinovski just doesn’t like folding I don’t think it’s so complicated as the video explains
I love your videos mate. Cheers from France
Thanks buddy, cheers
i mean on start i knew it was a easy call. but nice theory behind it.
whale detected
Very nice end of the video
Thanks for the content.
Valeu Marcelao, tamo junto
The difference is I called and they had a set or straight ……😂
Is that possible Barak hit set of 3 on river and wanted max value from A?
No, dont think 33 would ever check-raise the turn
i sign up newsletter but dont get email
Check your spam folder
Bro, why are you using a 500nl rake hu solution for 100/200? You don't have pio? or you're just shilling gtowizard.
All of the river analysis makes no sense. There was no overbet. The effective river bet was 24.3k. that is what needed to be analyzed
Now I understand why…
Great video
Thank you!
I have no idea what's going on
When you look at solvers like this humans could never memorise all of this, my only worry is RTAs that make poker obsolete online, p.s....High risk tolerance joins 100 200 blinds online.....3 hours later......COSTA!!!!!
why they play with each other?
Fun/challenge, to hold the table or because the table broke and they forgot to leave. Would be surprised if they thought they have an edge over the other
Everyone now gonna go call the river and lose there bank roll lol
NLHE has had it's soul ripped out and torn to threads. This stuff is sickening man
How does the SB “check behind”? Doesn’t he act first?
Hey Marcus. In HU the SB is also the BTN, so he acts last postflop
@@saulocostapoker thank you!
Does me aggressively liking tons of comments help you with the algorithm?
If so, every time you release a video, I'll smash in a few likes on comments.
Keep doing what you're doing. 👍✌️
Haha thank you so much Matt! If you just watch all my videos from start to finish, that's enough for helping with the algorithm 😊
There is no difference, just a bigger bank account
That's itself a pretty significant difference 😀
Making decisions on an infinite horizon seems smart. So over infinite time my decision is valid with the maths. Ok cool but don’t I die really soon bro?
if you play with your nuts slowly on the flop its better noted
I am not a pro, but I call also with a8 off against a pro.
The newest strategy no one is doing is playing small stakes on a new account against yourself and making the stats look like DOG water on purpose.
Then using that shit stat account to bet big money against these AI and pro players who will look at your profile and open their ranges…
Easy - free money glitch
You pondered for years why the best players are the best? It's because they're better at everything, every spot.
With all due respect mate, that's just circular logic. It doesn't explain anything
Online poker is still a thing? Weird. I wouldn't trust a dollar online these days.
Negative news and scandals generate more clicks, that's why its all the media covers. But online poker is still going strong
Pretty obvious bluff no?
🤔
poker made simple lol
10x
Or its just superusing mf right ? Simple as that 😂😂
Love your Videos btw 👌
lol in this case is just ability 😁
he can play like mother and father and house and dog in that pot i checked my ace so he can bluff it all for all money, its not bouth money.
💡
Nice video, but Wiktor is eastern european and just thought cuka blyat, call
♥
Fk GTO- too much overrated
Boss
First!
Congratulations!
these type of nerdy gto videos are super cringe worthy to me for some reason... What stakes do you play saulo?
"nerdy gto videos" remind me some gold Luke Schwartz interviews xD
he's played up to highstakes 2knl on GG and stars
total nonsense
🤔
Can someone tell me what he says at the 6:12 mark?
Reg tolerance? Rich tolerance? Im cant quite hear it properly
Risk tolerance
thanks@@88Nieznany88
Just seeing that 3.78x jam was enough to cause my nose to start bleeding. 👃🩸
Right? So sick
Incredible video
Thank you Charlie!