The clarity of presentation is just mind blowing. Establishing the subject without a single equation. This allows you to immerse the subject matter and the maths can elegantly bring it out life.
lol seriously, for all we know he could have been drawing bananas and apples on the board, poor quality video. I didn't watch the whole video because of poor quality but I'll take your word for it lol
P.A.M.Dirac was one of the smartest men that lived in the 20th century. His matrix mechanics methods for doing Quantum mechanics are easy and revealing.
Hey if you've got like more than 1 or 2 years to live: it's not too late. So c'mon. Stop using your age as an excuse to not do the things you want to do! We always say: "when I'm older" or "it's too late". Well, no. it's always the right time. We are never truly that old or that young anyway. Life's a moment.
Mathematics are connected to physics, you always need mathematics to quantify, to evaluate ideas, feasibility, limits..... I've learnt maths and physics at university maths is like a game and a tool for physics which is more philosophical, it's how I see it. They are both amazing to learn and play with. We should have scientists to drive our world instead of those dumb illetrate politicians.
Take A Moment No god's required or seen in my foxhole for 40yrs 3:02 Genius at play 3:13 Stay Safe Keep Asking Questions and Stay Free ❤ 3:49 simple 👌 4:09 beautiful, painting pictures in my mind ✨️ 4:50 ....❤ Thank you, Sir, for your work, peace , love, etc 6:42 evolution rolls on ●●●♤
Einstein mentioned God many times, one of his famous quotes was "God doesn't play dice". Also was very well known that he wasn't religious. Physicists of the era were typically "agnostic", in a sense that they don't know what, if anything lies beyond the universe. Abrahamic religions were thus completely discluded.
Scientists are too often concerned with putting one foot in front of the other, carefully watching their steps. Meanwhile they could climb a tree and look off in the distance to find the path. That tree is temporarily letting go of the scientific method, the distance is God, the path is scientific progress. Certain concepts “click” into place in a way that supersedes a hunch or mere gut instinct- as if it were not even your own thought- as if it was an irrefutable fact that you had forgotten you ever knew. Very few humans have the necessary specialized expertise in the related subjects to follow through and prove such revelations. Even fewer will admit to having looked in the distance rather than down at their feet when coming to their conclusions.
Ch/(2pi*137.036)=(e+)=k*e^2=(e-)=me*(c/137.036)^2*A : Dirac's quantum field can deduce 1/(2pi*137.036)=0.001161409725=e+/ch : Schwinger's weak QED for anomalous electron magnetic moment of (g-2)/2 factor.
Dirac is grappling with the problem of probabilistic to determinism. Theis problem still haunts QM. Only Quantum computation can achieve determinism, but the infinite axiom algorithm still deceive us. Susskind proposed a rudimentary finite gate quantum circuit, but further work is needed for infinite complexity. Ramanujan's q-series might hold the answer.
It should be fairly easy to build an infinite improbability drive, once we have the finite probability generator fully functional. I'm assuming there's be no issue in providing a suitable source of Brownian motion.
I'm an autodidactic philosopher, and if you believe it, my love for Cormac McCarthy brought me here. Now, I'd say that is an interesting interaction of spectral operators in the vector space of life.
It is hearthfully wonderfull to literally walk in the shoes with that beautiful thinker.. .here is where A.I. could be definitively usefull...giving clear blackboard drawing of those maths and by the way subtitles that make some sens to another form of intelligence.....isnt it a pity...
I recorded it because no one seemed interested to get Dirac on tape. I tried to get a 16mm camera but was told that was too expensive. I was a broke undergraduate student at the time. So we only had these early spool tapes and hand held cameras where video was new. Strictly, these cameras were still illegal in New Zealand as they were perceived to breach commercial TV copyright. No one cared about copyright with Dirac's talks ..too interested in sharing truth; not restricting his revelations for money.
i like the way he ended with saying bohr was right if you assume quantum mechanics is all we can do. which was the original question they argued about, but not right in general lol. assuming the conclusion is nonsense. bohr should have known better
Unbelievable DIRAC was an intellectual giant. Yet his lecture is of life changing consequences Yet this lecture has less views than a girls makeup class. Shameful
Well because what's life changing is not so entertaining. Makeup classes are sort of the final product in a long chain of humanity processes. The mundane is built on top of the incredible.
*Thel days of the awful videotapes. Prone to lose quality over copying generations* ..... someone may or may not have the original, but this awful tape looks like it has gone through several generations of copying......and the good audio looks more like some ai restoration or something
all the comments , which described this as science, means that their authors don't know: what is science, what is knowledge, what is Scientific Method for obtaining of knowledge and science Logic(def.: science for correct thinking and proper construction of thoughts/and mankind's criterion of reasonableness/). what benefits mankind has received from quantum mechanics till now? :)))
what benefits? Well, the transistor is a pretty good example. In fact all of semiconductor technology and superconductor technology. Medical imaging like MRI. Radiation therapy. Truly a massive amount of current technology would not be possible without our understanding of quantum mechanics.
@@shocklab "blessed are believers"(from bible) "in unreal fantasies"(from me) :) none of your statements are true - they are only the dreams of proponents of unrealistic theories. read the technical documentation from the manufacturer of everything you listed and send me a link that relates them to relativity and quantum mechanics, please :)
@@tonytomov4553 1/Why should any rational person care what you assert without evidence? That which is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence, as Christopher Hitchens pointed out. Furthermore, why do you need to lie about reality in the way you do? Seriously? In what precise way are any of his statements false? You forgot to say. Your behaviour is the sort creationists typically engage in. Are you some sort of absurd creationist, perhaps? Do tell. 2/ You are appealing to your incredulity, and that is a well-known fallacy. What you happen to believe has absolutely no necessary link to what is actually true, unless you can back them up with at least some valid and verified evidence. You have demonstrably presented absolutely no evidence of any sort for anything you have claimed! 3/ Why should any rational person believe a word you have claimed when you have failed to produce a single piece of valid and verified evidence for any of your empty assertions?
@@niblick616 if you defined a person, who believe in : science,Scientific Method for obtaining of knowledge and science Logic, as creationist, you must seriously to educate yourself in the field of what is science, what is knowledge, what is Scientific Method for obtaining of knowledge and laws of science Logic. relativism and quantum mechanics grossly contradict these means of humanity to obtain correct knowledge. can you write to us the definitions of science and knowledge so to let us know on what basis you defining relativism and quantum mechanics as "scientific knowledge"? ask your professors (who teach this nonsense) to help you for this definitions :) :) the laws of nature are the same at all levels of organization of matter ! and the theories you believe in, if they are confirmed according to the rules of the Scientific Method and the laws of science Logic /from several independent sources/ are recognized by the international scientific community as knowledge! and no one must calls them theories anymore ! :)
@@tonytomov4553 I have three books in my office on MRI and one on solid state physics, explaining precisely how semiconductors work. Does that not count?
I love how the pictures are subjected to quantum movement.
Everything is. When you think it's not, it still is. It's just a force balance.
I hope everyone appreciates that Dirac probably spoke more in this one video than he did throughout the entire 1930s. 😂
Omg, a dirac video with clear audio....im a year late, but very happy
Years of uni courses summarized in a masterful way. Thanks dirac and thank you for posting this piece of history
The clarity of presentation is just mind blowing. Establishing the subject without a single equation. This allows you to immerse the subject matter and the maths can elegantly bring it out life.
lol seriously, for all we know he could have been drawing bananas and apples on the board, poor quality video. I didn't watch the whole video because of poor quality but I'll take your word for it lol
lmao@@jeremiahlethoba7445
What WAS he writing as Heisenberg’s matrix???
@@dougr.2398Just 'X' s...showing placings, not content
@@dougr.2398please find. Please tell me.
Wow. This is brilliant. So so brilliant, what a gift, I am stunned! TY!
One of my heroes, along with Maxwell and Feynman......
Yes
Ty for posting these lectures explaining the coherent body of scientific facts an theories of the time.
Really wonderful. Thanks!!
Nice cleanup of Audio!
Yes, that's the only reason I clicked xD. To see how clear his voice sounded
P.A.M.Dirac was one of the smartest men that lived in the 20th century. His matrix mechanics methods for doing Quantum mechanics are easy and revealing.
Top 5 for sure.
Wow, didn't know there were any recordings of Dirac. Innnnncredible
Like time travel. Brilliant! Thanks X 1M
Thank you so much! Something I'd never thought I'd ever see
What a gem..
I love Mr Dirac.
la verité vraie !! quel plaisir de voir et d entendre ce genie
God blessed the microphone so nothing of his beautiful speech got lost
The first minute and 15 seconds reminds me of how I used to try to watch Cinemax late at night when I was a young boy.
Thank you for this gem! I am blown away by this mans mind. Razon sharp mind at an advanced age.
Lets hope you video inspires young physicists. NICE ONE J S !
...well, halfway in i realised how important maths can be, maths, something i never grasped and now it's too late, however, this is good listening😂
Ahhh, it’s never too late. At least in my humble opinion.
Same af 😂
Hey if you've got like more than 1 or 2 years to live: it's not too late. So c'mon. Stop using your age as an excuse to not do the things you want to do! We always say: "when I'm older" or "it's too late". Well, no. it's always the right time. We are never truly that old or that young anyway. Life's a moment.
Getting older is probably better for understanding maths
Mathematics are connected to physics, you always need mathematics to quantify, to evaluate ideas, feasibility, limits..... I've learnt maths and physics at university maths is like a game and a tool for physics which is more philosophical, it's how I see it. They are both amazing to learn and play with. We should have scientists to drive our world instead of those dumb illetrate politicians.
how many old vd?
24:50
Just fascinating
11:00 Did Dirac say, "...as God revealed to me..." ?? Anyway, what a gem!
Take A Moment No god's required or seen in my foxhole for 40yrs 3:02
Genius at play 3:13
Stay Safe
Keep Asking Questions and Stay Free ❤
3:49 simple 👌
4:09 beautiful, painting pictures in my mind ✨️
4:50 ....❤
Thank you, Sir, for your work, peace , love, etc
6:42 evolution rolls on ●●●♤
I think he says something like "it got intuitive to me", or "It got into view to me"
"It's got revealed to me" is what I heard...
Einstein mentioned God many times, one of his famous quotes was "God doesn't play dice". Also was very well known that he wasn't religious. Physicists of the era were typically "agnostic", in a sense that they don't know what, if anything lies beyond the universe. Abrahamic religions were thus completely discluded.
Scientists are too often concerned with putting one foot in front of the other, carefully watching their steps. Meanwhile they could climb a tree and look off in the distance to find the path. That tree is temporarily letting go of the scientific method, the distance is God, the path is scientific progress.
Certain concepts “click” into place in a way that supersedes a hunch or mere gut instinct- as if it were not even your own thought- as if it was an irrefutable fact that you had forgotten you ever knew.
Very few humans have the necessary specialized expertise in the related subjects to follow through and prove such revelations. Even fewer will admit to having looked in the distance rather than down at their feet when coming to their conclusions.
Very interesting.
Wow I didn't know he had lectures I feel like I went in a time machine
...who needs pictures when the audio is very clean?!?
~20:00 Is Uv-vu
Is it copyright free? I'd like to use a very short audio extract (15 seconds more or less) as a sample in a song. Thank you!
I couldn't find anywhere with copyright to on it.
Yes, feel free to use as much of the video as you like. They are for anyone anytime completely free. 😊 What's the song? Video?
Where are the next 3 lectures?
Have a look on my UA-cam page. They are all there.
@@shocklab Thanks, good work.
Can't see the man or what he's doing... but he's very clean.
Ch/(2pi*137.036)=(e+)=k*e^2=(e-)=me*(c/137.036)^2*A : Dirac's quantum field can deduce 1/(2pi*137.036)=0.001161409725=e+/ch : Schwinger's weak QED for anomalous electron magnetic moment of (g-2)/2 factor.
Dirac is grappling with the problem of probabilistic to determinism. Theis problem still haunts QM. Only Quantum computation can achieve determinism, but the infinite axiom algorithm still deceive us. Susskind proposed a rudimentary finite gate quantum circuit, but further work is needed for infinite complexity. Ramanujan's q-series might hold the answer.
It should be fairly easy to build an infinite improbability drive, once we have the finite probability generator fully functional. I'm assuming there's be no issue in providing a suitable source of Brownian motion.
so what's written on the blackboard?😆😆😆😆
you can find it in the associated book with transscriptions.
I understand quantum physics...
8:39
No,I don't 8:56
❤❤❤❤❤❤ 9:05
Thanks for this 🫡
The hitchhiker’s guide to being the one dude who’s as smart (or maybe even smarter) than Von Neumann.
I'm an autodidactic philosopher, and if you believe it, my love for Cormac McCarthy brought me here. Now, I'd say that is an interesting interaction of spectral operators in the vector space of life.
Could you just check for me? That chair is firmly bolted to the floor isn't it?
@@qwadratix Great book.
It is hearthfully wonderfull to literally walk in the shoes with that beautiful thinker.. .here is where A.I. could be definitively usefull...giving clear blackboard drawing of those maths and by the way subtitles that make some sens to another form of intelligence.....isnt it a pity...
Why would anyone want to record this video in a university class room and did he allow it?
He did allow it, and why shouldn't it be recorded in a university class room?
I recorded it because no one seemed interested to get Dirac on tape. I tried to get a 16mm camera but was told that was too expensive. I was a broke undergraduate student at the time. So we only had these early spool tapes and hand held cameras where video was new. Strictly, these cameras were still illegal in New Zealand as they were perceived to breach commercial TV copyright. No one cared about copyright with Dirac's talks ..too interested in sharing truth; not restricting his revelations for money.
"crossed h" 😮 ħ
OG Alchemist
i like the way he ended with saying bohr was right if you assume quantum mechanics is all we can do. which was the original question they argued about, but not right in general lol. assuming the conclusion is nonsense. bohr should have known better
Where did you find this?
see the description :-)
Genius 🎉🎉🎉
The audio is clear but the writings on the blackboard are as clear as an electron cloud...
Mind your P’s and Q’s.
Unbelievable
DIRAC was an intellectual giant. Yet his lecture is of life changing consequences
Yet this lecture has less views than a girls makeup class.
Shameful
Well because what's life changing is not so entertaining. Makeup classes are sort of the final product in a long chain of humanity processes. The mundane is built on top of the incredible.
@@paulinercopoththis is highly entertaining. Except not to the average Joe/Mary
❤❤❤❤
❤
The beginning of this video is like trying to watch HBO porn, but with physics
Dirac is peak physics
😮❤️👍😮😮😮
...oh, okay again at two minutes, moaned too soon i suppose.
and today we are using all that knowledge to squeeze one secret after another out of matter! (plz dont destroy earth in the proces)
Don't waste time with equations:
"Quantum Mechanics" - REAL EXPLAINATION:
ua-cam.com/video/8EUy_82IChY/v-deo.html
it looks like he is transparent like a ghost
good for listening, but watching will give you seizure.
He doesn't seem very clever
*Thel days of the awful videotapes. Prone to lose quality over copying generations* ..... someone may or may not have the original, but this awful tape looks like it has gone through several generations of copying......and the good audio looks more like some ai restoration or something
all the comments , which described this as science, means that their authors don't know: what is science, what is knowledge, what is Scientific Method for obtaining of knowledge and science Logic(def.: science for correct thinking and proper construction of thoughts/and mankind's criterion of reasonableness/).
what benefits mankind has received from quantum mechanics till now? :)))
what benefits? Well, the transistor is a pretty good example. In fact all of semiconductor technology and superconductor technology. Medical imaging like MRI. Radiation therapy. Truly a massive amount of current technology would not be possible without our understanding of quantum mechanics.
@@shocklab "blessed are believers"(from bible) "in unreal fantasies"(from me) :)
none of your statements are true - they are only the dreams of proponents of unrealistic theories. read the technical documentation from the manufacturer of everything you listed and send me a link that relates them to relativity and quantum mechanics, please :)
@@tonytomov4553
1/Why should any rational person care what you assert without evidence? That which is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence, as Christopher Hitchens pointed out. Furthermore, why do you need to lie about reality in the way you do? Seriously? In what precise way are any of his statements false? You forgot to say. Your behaviour is the sort creationists typically engage in. Are you some sort of absurd creationist, perhaps? Do tell.
2/ You are appealing to your incredulity, and that is a well-known fallacy. What you happen to believe has absolutely no necessary link to what is actually true, unless you can back them up with at least some valid and verified evidence. You have demonstrably presented absolutely no evidence of any sort for anything you have claimed!
3/ Why should any rational person believe a word you have claimed when you have failed to produce a single piece of valid and verified evidence for any of your empty assertions?
@@niblick616 if you defined a person, who believe in : science,Scientific Method for obtaining of knowledge and science Logic, as creationist, you must seriously to educate yourself in the field of what is science, what is knowledge, what is Scientific Method for obtaining of knowledge and laws of science Logic.
relativism and quantum mechanics grossly contradict these means of humanity to obtain correct knowledge.
can you write to us the definitions of science and knowledge so to let us know on what basis you defining relativism and quantum mechanics as "scientific knowledge"? ask your professors (who teach this nonsense) to help you for this definitions :) :)
the laws of nature are the same at all levels of organization of matter !
and the theories you believe in, if they are confirmed according to the rules of the Scientific Method and the laws of science Logic /from several independent sources/ are recognized by the international scientific community as knowledge! and no one must calls them theories anymore ! :)
@@tonytomov4553 I have three books in my office on MRI and one on solid state physics, explaining precisely how semiconductors work. Does that not count?
Hello,
Quantum theory does not satisfy the universe's physics.
Listen directly to the geniuses and you'll be free of the spin of popularizers and influencers
So true. Listen from Horse mouth directly.
And the lectures were free to the public...just walk in and take a seat...ask a question if you like...😊