World of Warships - I commited a SIN
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 лют 2025
- I was doing all cruisers so I had to do the Big Zao as well.
I know I know .... but it was worth it....and ofc I had no intention of shooting AP at all because AP is for tryhards, but than I commited a sin xD shame on me
Enjoy and have fun watching ;)
Support me on Patreon - / flambass
Join the team on Discord - / discord
Follow me on Twitter - / flambass_eu
-- Watch live at / flambass
That Hindenburg has a 34.82% WR in his Hindenburg.. HOW
It's either: He just plays for "fun" and doesn't know/care that his winrate is terrible, or all his losses are his teams' faults.
Due to large amounts of glue being inhaled nasally! Eating lots of crayons 😜
Jesus, that's getting close to he has to try and lose to achieve that low wr %
34.82% is pretty good, I'm getting battles where our CV has 30% wr, with 80+ games on a T10 CV....
John B 34 in a non CV class ship is way below average. Because of the influence CV can have in a round and how hard core a bad CV player is neutralised their stats tend to get pushed to extremes. CV mains always top the boards on raw win rate and bad CV players fall way below average win rates. This guy drops below around 30% in a non CV ship, that's them trying to lose instead of just being really crap
"GET OFF MY PROPERTY" click-click...I laughed and laughed and laughed
11:04 THAT WAS MY COMMENT IN THE CHAT... I am so glad and there are tears in my eyes
That Conqueror dispersion of yours looks like what I get whenever I play the Yamato with accuracy and legendary upgrade
I love switching over to AP on these! It's soooo fun watching them melt because they thought they could broadside me! 😀😀
Funny how they complain they lost three ships, but it makes sense that the enemy focuses radar cruisers. Also, right at that point, the conqueror is broadside to Republique with its shredder guns. Good thing he's focusing the radar cruisers rather than the Flambass ;)
Yeah, after a quick check, you can see that both DesM are trying to get into a position where they can defend the Yueyang capping from the expected Shimakaze/Worcester. They rely on Yamato and Conqueror scaring the enemy BBs to survive. To semi-quote Flamu and Flambass himself "you're big and scary and part of your job is to scare the enemy away". Fat luck, Yamato and Conqueror are behind the island where they cannot do that. I think it's a bit easy to blame the team since at no point he said "here's my plan". Also consider this: what would have happened should the enemy Yamato have spawned/gone right. It only gets spotted after 2:00, at which point Flambass has already committed himself to this tactic. If Flambass was watching another player do exactly what he does, he'd flame him (admittedly, another player would fail to get at least two of these splendid killing shots, but this clearly demonstrates the problem: you cannot expect your team to shoot with Unicorn accuracy, and hence play with tactics that rely on it). Flambass loses because his positioning is wrong, based on everything Flambass explained in other videos. If you look at the minimal at 8:52, you find that the Yueyang went to support Shima at A after those DesM got slapped by unchecked enemy BBs. They soon become fully unsupported DDs because Yamato just got nuked and Chapayev has zero chance against Yamato guns. They still get the Gearing, cap alone, then have to run from Mogami/Yamato pincering them while Flambass deals damage and defends the C10 square. Not to mention the enemy Worcester could (and should) have gone and defended C, where he actually would have radared/nuked the DDs much earlier with very little risk. Some of Flambass' teammates are bad, but the fact remains that red Hindenburg and red Worcester could have been dead by 4:00, and then the game would very likely had ended in a win.
Anyway, I wish I could display 50% as much skill as he does even in that game ^^
I would have never thought of the problem of not being able to watch your videos anymore...
because I saw the battles on your stream already XD
OOO - Flambass rocking my favorite camo on my favorite ship! Great game - and you truly experienced the Conqueror's dispersion evil! LOL - BTW - Shame on you for the AP!
No kraken... WRONG!! lmao I pissed myself laughing at that, so predictable.
Regarding your dispersion it's because you don't have omni hacks any more, you get what the rest of us get lol!!
3:20 You get planes up until rank 8 or 9 actually. I know for a fact that my Monarch has one. I am not quite sure about Lion though.
Also, I met a similar guy. 40% overall win rate, only plays German BBs and CAs, has 4000+ battles, sits in our spawn spamming HE in a Tirpitz and yells at his teammates to stop camping. XD
Yes, you get the spotter/fighter option with the Lion
yes we all know these idiots camping the front line..... (heavy sarcasm here)
The Budgie Admiral T6-9 you have a plane plus Warspite. T3-5 , T10 , Nelson , Hood, Duke of York don't have.
nice work flambass
at first I thought it was a 457 conqueror! but this is still good!
Ha ha ha you got a kraken so that guy will aim for the ship now. Lol
Flambass::⚓ Like your cool GamePlay Flamster👍🏼⚓🎃, New Subscriber., and it happens when we all such at certain matches cant seem to hit ships nice and hard like other times, cant always be winners.
AP in the Conquer is far from a sin. Use it when they give you the chance.
Those medals man
If this game was in go navy event u would have earned A LOT of pointa
We have a speshul room in discord callled "soul-crushing-defeats".... this game would have been an honorary guest
He pinged after wooster died, he couldn't know before anyway.
Looks like you had better shots with AP :P
Achivements... gota catch em all
pat..pat..pat on your shoulder Flambass,...there, there. You cant win them all! ;)
Did u changed micro or voice ? Flambass is a reptalian?
Your sin was telling everyone to cap then turning away from one yourself.... XD
If I´m honest I never had more fun playing the game than with my current BB grind for the brits...I didnt really played the Orion, it was ok, but the Queen Elizabeth was a blessing...I would not cry if they would change every british BB into that kind off playstyle with the exception of the KGV, because the KGV is just pure fun and enjoyment to play, despite how squishy and flamable it is. Lets see how Monarch turns out tho :D
TraMaChi Well. Then what I'm telling you next will turn you off: Monarch is the worst ship in the line, since she is basically tier 8 KGV with 380mm gun and better armor. Her HE is worse than KGV, and she still have that wonky AP shell, so duelling with BB is your death sentense. ;)
Or, that's what people will say to you. Me? I consider Mornarch a very potent ship to play, provided that you know how to play: Use her amazing concealment to her fulleat. And forcus your gun on delete enemy cruiser and you are all set. :D
Good luck monarch
I stopped after 2 game
TraMaChi good luck with Monarch.lol mine was faulty. It's also the only ship I have ever had ALL main battery guns knocked out permanently 😲 it was on 2 brothers and was barely 5mins into the battle. Fun & Engaging that was not 😜
My first Monarch game - kraken right away, no joke! But also fair to say - it went downhill from there >_< it is considered the least favorite ship in that line.
The KGV is definitely the highlight of the Brit BB line. after that it goes down hill. Monarch & Lion trash boats. Conqueror is good because you get 12 accurate flame throwers & you don't have to grind anymore.
what timezone are you in,im in us east.
That's what happens when you commit those kinds of sins in WoWs. I'm still cracking up after watching this, best WoWs comments ever! Sounds just like me when I'm playing. LMAO
So Khaba next for T10 cruiser?
A herculean effort, but honestly, I really dont get the point of this ship existing in this form. Why cant RN BBs have the semi-AP national flavour same as the CLs? Let them have only short fuse AP, and the improved bounce angles that were on the Stalingrad version 2. Improve deck armour a little, around 35-36 mm and it would be resistant to HE spam too. Conqueror, God forbid, would be an effective ship capable of carrying a team to victory. Instead... we have this mess.
"Why cant RN BBs have the semi-AP national flavour same as the CLs?"
They do. It's just that game mechanics prevent the AP being as consistent as the HE. The ship needs nothing buffed, just the 419s removed and a normal fuse on the 457s+ overmatching 32mm. The ship is fine otherwise. It's okay fun to play with AP, although might as well play a Montana... The reason I looked forward to the ship in testing, was that it only had the 457s, but they added the 419s for the newbs.
Flambass was just going meme with the HE spam, would've killed the worcesters outright if he had AP loaded + the enemy Conq wouldn't have been as much of a threat. BUT this video does showcase why it's not a good idea to always spam HE.
I literally once queued the Conq (like I do once a month maybe, I really want the 419s gone, but won't intentionally nerf a ship I play) just to burn down a Missouri. I'd been spammed all evening with 1-2 shitty Missouri's and I simply needed revenge. I pushed a cap/flank together with a hero Richelieu, only shooting AP at everything, racking up 200k before I even reached the Missouri that spent all match hiding and running (angled, so he was a mite better than every Missouri I'd played with that night), so after killing the remaining threats in the area, I went to town on the little shit that embodied everything that bothered me that night. Conqueror can push and be effective with AP and pushing, it's just not easy for the majority of players. Doesn't warrant any buffs, though.
"Improve deck armour a little, around 35-36 mm and it would be resistant to HE spam too."
No. I'll tell you why: it's a flanking BB, it NEEDS this weakness. Plus, its weakness isn't HE as many would have you believe. It's AP from any source, be it DDs, cruisers or BBs that absolutely wreck it. DM spamming 4-5k volleys on a Conq? How about 5-10k AP volleys from ANY angle? Shit, I've hit Conquerors for 15-20k AP in a Zao. But this is fine, it's not supposed to straight up tank cruisers like a Yamato or Montana would. Its concealment and turn radius suggest otherwise.
If anything, it needs a range nerf. Then again, so does every other tier 9-10 BB, except the Germans.
DaKillerChipmunk well what I meant is why can't they give the AP improved bounce angles and just keep the AP and remove HE completely? The 419s should be gone, and replaced by 457s with a little better dispersion and a reload buff to 25 seconds? The 457s have a penetration curve similar to that of Yamato, and with the improved bounce angles, they could be extremely effective in the right hands. Heck, even the King George could perform well with improved bounce angles, firing only AP. I mean come on, firing HE in a battleship is the anti-thesis to battleship gameplay. You should not be firing HE, nor should you be encouraged to.
Also, about Conqueror being a flanker, I would have to disagree with you. A flanking ship should have higher speed, like the Republique. It doesnt have to be 34 knots, but it can be 32, atleast? Instead it has 29.5 which is the second lowest in tier 10. The turning radius is also pretty big, and having a good rudder shift time doesn't mean the ship will turn faster - I believe it is called Hydrodynamic effect? The problem is that if the Conqueror over-commits to a flank in an aggressive stance, no amount of concealment will practically help it. In fact, the Conqueror players who use their concealment to its greatest effect are usually 15km from the closest enemy. So it does not have tools to save itself beyond the heal, which is not a very effective tool, because once it is on cooldown, you will again be farmed very quickly because everyone knows how much you can heal at once.
Instead of a flanker, I think Conqueror and by extension all RN BBs, are similar in function to USN BBs with a few differences. So I think a 35-36mm deck will actually help it. You have my support for the range nerf, my friend - absolutely, nerf Montana and Conqueror max ranges to 21km, Yamato and Republique to 24km and Kurfurst remains the same.
My proposal for changes to the RN BB would be this - remove HE, give semi-AP with improved autobounce angles similar to Des Moines and Minotaur, nerf Conqueror's concealment even more to 13km with all modules, skills and camo, or atleast 12.8km and buff the deck armour to prevent raw HE damage. While Montana can function both at mid and short range effectively, Conqueror will be effective at mid and long range (because 457s, like Yamato's 460s, are very heavy weight shells and can retain their kinetic energy over long distances).
DaKillerChipmunk umm... Montana's retarded? Conqueror AP does not overpen ever? Okay, you are entitled to your opinion, but my argument is based on the USN BBs which are, for me, the prototype for battleship design in this game. I think no other line is as well balanced. I want a ship that, while unique, is not an extreme outlier like the Conqueror. Republique, like Montana is an example of good battleship design, as well as the Kurfurst, though I really want secondaries to mean something in tier 10. Yamato is out there, but not necessarily a complete outlier like the Conqueror. I will gladly play a ship that resembles Montana while still keeping its unique characteristics. You say that the short fuse AP causes penetrations all the time? Nothing could be farther from the truth. The fuse has to arm before it detinates and for that it has to pass through armour equivalent to 1/6th its gun calibre. Even the Stalingrad version 2 - with a smaller gun calibre with penetration approaching BB levels - had regular overpens. Short fuse isn't everything.
Also warships is a team game. If I commit to a flank at tier 10, there is a great chance that at this level, there will be competent DD players scouting an area and it might not be possible to turn around in such a situation or take advantage of the concealment. There must be some margin of error while playing a videogame, right? It can't all be hit or miss? Otherwise, like the game is now, its no fun.
This is completely my own opinion, just FYI. I'm sure your idea of a good BB is not the same as mine, and neither should it be. But you have to atleast agree that Conqueror needs changes, not nerfs?
"Republique, like Montana is an example of good battleship design"
No, they're not. Republique deals a lot of damage, but isn't reliable like Montana or Yamato.
Montana is far more broken than any other tier X BB, but no one talks about it because everyone plays it and doesn't spam HE like Conqueror. Montana needs a range nerf and its raised citadel back. Iowa needed the lower citadel, because it was a literal downgrade from NC, way back when. Montana never needed it and players don't even use the advantages it gives.
GK and Yamato are the only balanced tier X BBs and I play neither of them, because Montana is broken and I don't like nerfing myself.
"You say that the short fuse AP causes penetrations all the time? Nothing could be farther from the truth."
Look, I never play BBs. When I do, it's because I need to for a mission/challenge. The fact that I front pen everyone's superstructure for 10k in Conqueror implies that it does. Tradeoff for that, as I said, is that it doesn't citadel as easily as other nations.
"Even the Stalingrad version 2"
Which has 250m/s faster muzzle velocity than Conqueror. Penning is about fuse delays, muzzle velocity and angles of attack, nothing more. Meaning, Stalingrad's shells spend less time in the superstructure than Conqueror's. Conqueror's AP has half the fuse time of other BBs, whereas Stalingrad had a fuse delay akin to RN CLs. HOWEVER, due to the ridiculous difference in shell velocity + the fact that Russian shells don't slow down, Stalingrad still overpens. This comparison is apples to oranges, my friend.
"But you have to atleast agree that Conqueror needs changes, not nerfs?"
I think BBs need a rebalance, not just Conqueror. And people need to learn how to deal with game mechanics, rather than moan about them (not implying you, I mean general Conqueror haters). Also, WG needs to learn how to fix ships properly instead of band-aid fixes that change the identity of ships and just move the problem elsewhere.
Imo, Conqueror is fine. the ships you want it to be like, are not. GK takes a fuckton of damage, does not have a super heal, has no concealment and can't dodge torpedoes, yet is fine the way it is.
Oh, before you think I'm a Montana hater, let me clarify something:
Montana is so broken, that despite the fact that the scoreboard suggested I carried 90% of the (120) Tier X matches last ranked season (I played Des Moines), this was my conclusion (I kept records):
Assuming 3 BBs per team.
Against a team without Montanas:
3x Montana on my team -> 100% win (Montanas aren't even in the top 3)
2x Montana + 1x Yamato on my team ->90% win (Usually 1 Montana 2nd or 3rd)
2x Montana + 1x GK on my team ->90% win (Usually 1 Montana 2nd or 3rd)
1x Montana + 2x Yamato on my team ->50% win (No BBs top 3)
1x Montana + 2x GK on my team ->50% win (No BBs top 3)
1x Montana + 1x GK + 1x Yamato on my team -> 40% win (Montana or GK 2nd or 3rd)
2x Montana + 1x Republique/Conqueror on my team -> 60% win (no BBs top 3 on wins, Rep/Conq 1st on loss)
1x Montana + 2x Republique/Conqueror on my team -> 30% win (no BBs top 3 on wins, Rep/Conq 1st on loss)
1x Republique/Conqueror + 2x Yamato/GK on my team -> 40% win (Rep/Conq 1st or 2nd win or loss)
2x Republique/Conqueror + 1x Yamato/GK on my team -> 0% win (Rep/Conq 1st or 2nd win or loss)
3x Republique/Conqueror on my team -> 0% win (Rep/Conq 1st or 2nd)
Against a team with Montanas:
1 Montana on the enemy team -> 70% survival rate for my DM
2 Montana on the enemy team -> 30% survival rate for my DM
3 Montana on the enemy team -> 0% survival rate for my DM
Granted, I'm not Unicum, but 120 matches is a pretty solid test sample. I only really fucked up 2 matches. In conclusion:
-Conqueror can't push cap like Yamato/GK/Montana
-Republique can't push anything other than map borders
-Conqueror/Republique consistently outdamage the other 3 BBs, given enough time, but rarely alpha anything, barring extreme luck.
-Montana offers win condition more than any other BB. (Sheer alpha power on DDs and cruisers/BBs that make a mistake)
-GK/Yamato also offer win condition, but each have a massive shortcoming compared to Montana. (GK is a sponge and has shit accuracy, Yamato is immobile)
Managed arsonist twice in one battle with the Conq - not easy, but definitely the ship to do it with!!
love a Flambass rant ;)
Wooster?
Or
Worcester?
So hard?
That dispersion reminds me of the Amagi.
Had to give it a like
I love the Conquek so much! Even typing Hi in the chat gets everyone mad lol I'm going to spam it until the playerbase stops being a pussy, with the new HE meta Conquek fits perfectly. Best ship in game
problem i see is not enough focus on the 2 woosters and putting them under pressure this is why dd die cause bb only like to shoot bb instead of the ca's
SHAAAMMMEE!! SHAAAAAAMMMEE!!!
Flambass If WG lets you, could you re-do The MM for Medium and High Tiers? Thank you.
Listening to him rage is kinda satisfying
Do you smell that?
Smells like Baguette Flambée xD
PS Flambass old thing: Committed has two t's
Give it a go with the 457mm, you may enjoy it :)
if Bill Murray had a sun he will probably be like you 👌😊😊
Lmao Nice Kraken
Why you don’t use AP
It's a
It's a
It's aaaa
It's a sin!
Just watching this and had conqueror and okinawa
Bahahahahahah the game play is good but the commentary is fckn brilliant most of the reason I watch
Was this a weekend match? lol
I Suffer from those ppl too with a WR of 38% on my Worcester with 50+ Games and my teams keep fk it up.... then ppl blame me for my WR with this ship but I got still 1700+ avg exp on it....
warspite has a plane.
How Conq trolls: tried her in training with my friend when they gave Conq copies for CW. My friend set 2 fires over some salvos and switched to AP. I proceeded to set 4 perma fires on him.
Why do switch to ap ia a sin?
Someone pls explain..
*Still newbs..
Higher tier British BBs are all about HE. They do more DPM with HE than AP typically. It's a design thing that WG did for British HE shells. Using AP on a high tier HE is mostly frowned upon.
Didn't you sell this ship like 2 times in a row???
love sin on conqueror!
mental breakdown in 16:20
Well Conq has the highest avg damage of all the ship on all the servers 109 k .then its Midway and Republique 3rd place ..but the most effective Killer at 1.52 Kills is the Kaga .Conq bearly gets 0.85 kills ..Midways get second place then its Haku in 3rd with 1.418
for your sins tonight b4 bed u need to say 4 hell marys and 5 hows your fathers...lol....how many awards...great game.
whats mean "SIN"?
It means..
U did terribly wrong..
I mean super wrong..
Example:killing
There are british BBS with Planes
"no idiot" forsenKek
as for the ping.. not his fault, it was on the Wooster so he only knew that
a sin good enough to win
HAHAHA map situation you have my luck
Nice game, but you seem to use your heals very early. You can heal far more with 1 heal than you clearly think. Literally, the heals are so strong you can actually print an entirely new ship.
I've just unlocked the Lion and although I try not to use the 46% fire chance HE, I feel like the ship is very strong just with the superheal.
well I love the royal bbs .. but not the conqueror.. that dispersion is annoying as hell
Why does flambass sound like he did not hit puberty 2 years ago?
Random games are almost unplayable. Too many idiots at high tiers who don't take time to learn before playing at tier 10. They fuck it up for everyone.
R1 teamm8 always not enough,noobs always more than good player....
Monarch has a plane
you weren't getting the most out of your heals. the conqueror can heal like 2/3 rds of its health
Tier 7-9 RN BBs got a plane
Queen Elizabeth (and Warspite) also has plane but only spotting plane.
I know I am being an idiot, but what sin did Flambass actually committed?
The Conquerer is famous for setting fires so many people never, ever, use AP in it.
LOL print new ship button :)
No 457s? You are not “sinner” enough
Watching you sin is enjoyable.
Randoms put their biggest effort in losing matches
Playing Conq is a sin, not using AP in it
*Barely fires one salvo with the proper lead or aim in the first 10 mins*
BLOODY DISPERSION
flambi... how could you
The game is set up to Nerf great players and buff noobs.. to even the players Feild and keep the noobs wanting to play WOW.
Cevan Triplett yeah, it's called RNG. It is random and I really don't think WG are fiddling in the background to slant RNG in favour of bad players though. They get caught pulling something like that it's the end of WoWs, WoT and WoWp as they use same RNG system. Way to big a risk especially considering all 3 are big, massive cash cows for them.
MoA-Reload... if you dont realize something is going on.. you're not paying enough attention. If nothing else the match making is totally screwing over great players to nurf thier abilitys.
Pull out a AA spec DM... and you'll never see a CV. WG does this to encourage CV play. Thats proof that something is going on behind the scenes... and it would not be that hard of a guess to say that its going on in different areas too.
Oh, another "Boo-hoo I should have win 100% against noobs but I cannot because RNG created by WG is cursing me", seriously - you can't just always win everything - either in games and in real life.
Learn to suck those moments that you tried hard and you can't win.
I have no proof but dose feel that way at times but it is still better than world of tanks so that something
It's always interesting to see someone with paranoid delusions in the wild. "How can they not know how broken their brain is?" we wonder, "why would anyone think random negative outcomes are really secret cabals working against them? How does that make any sense to them?" we continue to ponder. It's all a waste of time thought, because they are either nuts or just trolling and there's no understanding the former while the later are acting stupid on purpose.
Queen Lizy gets a plane fyi
thats a feelsbad
Carry harder ;)
It's not a sin as long as you do it for your team
*taps head*
jojo
send replay to Jongles
You WHAT
Conq op is it HAHAHAHA
that not the ,,wor ster,, is ,,wor cher ster,, rifle is not ,, win ster,, is ,,win ches ter,, fucking wor ches ter.
it's Con-CO-ROOOOR not ConCor ;)
it is a bitch to have computer players on your team
How can it be a sin when WG design the ship to be like that?( This is an Competitive MMO game, not World of Warcraft) XD
except that 24 players isn't massive
Why is it a sin though
This ship is too strong
Nah my Mino eats it easily because torpedo damage is not fully repairable. Its deck is easier to spam with AP compared to Montana. Its accuracy is rather so-so compared to Montana & Yamato (makes trolling it from open water easier).
I think conqueror need a fire chance nerf
Apparently WG is teaching people not to use AP in one of their guides, so I don't think they will nerf any fire chance because they are encouraging it.
hahahaahahahahahaahahahah
Get gud scrub don't you know you never go forward in the conqueror or use AP
REPENT
Noob team