Full Lecture: The Ultimate Aim of Psychoanalysis

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 48

  • @julianphilosophy
    @julianphilosophy  6 місяців тому +5

    Thank you for your attention today. You can find my “Complete Guide to Žižek” ebook here: www.patreon.com/julianphilosophy

  • @isaacgrant3784
    @isaacgrant3784 6 місяців тому +43

    Your videos stand out from the rest.

  • @surelygettingthere
    @surelygettingthere 3 місяці тому

    This probably gave me the new vocabulary to expand on my past attempts in explaining what it is exactly that is happening to me. Such luck to find this lecture. Thank you!

  • @joseestrada395
    @joseestrada395 4 місяці тому +1

    Please continue to make content, this is very good quality material

  • @raw_dah
    @raw_dah 6 місяців тому +2

    Your lectures are very very helpful. Words can not encapsulte my feelings gratefulness for your work. Thank you.

  • @satyasyasatyasya5746
    @satyasyasatyasya5746 6 місяців тому +25

    "Any mental analysis of the self without a material analysis of the world in which one lives, is nothing but solipsistic wankery"

    • @ir0n2541
      @ir0n2541 6 місяців тому +2

      "Wankery"... i'm going try to use this word today at some point.

    • @satyasyasatyasya5746
      @satyasyasatyasya5746 6 місяців тому +1

      @@ir0n2541 haha you're welcome :D

    • @EMC2Scotia
      @EMC2Scotia 6 місяців тому

      Is this video in some ways saying this is impossible?

    • @havadatequila
      @havadatequila 6 місяців тому

      True, but you can't do much about material conditions. Adaptation occurs in the individual.

    • @satyasyasatyasya5746
      @satyasyasatyasya5746 6 місяців тому +1

      @@havadatequila one cannot adapt to fire

  • @whowereweagain
    @whowereweagain 4 місяці тому +1

    What u say at the end... This is why I like guattari's observation that all fantasies are group fantasies, also his machinic unconscious discovery, that is perfect for nooetic quantum woo woo theory, very prescient.
    In anti-oedipus they say that capitalism society couldn't handle even one living desire so instead of oedipedializing desire and forcing it to traverse the void of castration we should recognize that it produces the real and push it past the limit, or something I don't know, I dont care, to say anything too smart or even for grammar, thanks again this is really helping me out for understanding anti-oedipus and some mysterious secret stuff

  • @scriptea
    @scriptea 6 місяців тому +1

    This is a fantastic series. Love the concept of subjective destitution. Recently wrote "There is a nonbeing of the I that thinks," which mirrors the "I think where I am not" statement of 21:22. Gonna use it as a lens to go through (again) Derrida's Margins of Philosophy.

  • @carlosdelclos
    @carlosdelclos 5 місяців тому

    That was really good, man. Thanks!

  • @TheBlapo
    @TheBlapo 5 місяців тому

    Thank you for this video and for your work. Greetings from Slovenia

  • @romerobjuancarlos
    @romerobjuancarlos 6 місяців тому

    Cheers! Has there been a change in the way audio is recorded? It sounds so much better. I'd been struggling a little bit for like a month or so. Thank you so much for what you do, Julian! Big hug.

  • @DrSolimanMD
    @DrSolimanMD 6 місяців тому +2

    Good afternoon Jolian. Engaging as always. The Zizekian definition of the goal of psychoanalysis is intriguing as it combines theories across time. Per Freud's theories, the goal of psychoanalysis is to "bring unconscious material in mind into conscious awareness." I believe the attachment theories emerged later, around Lacan's time. I would love to know your perspective regarding connecting the being and becoming concepts to the perspective shared in this lecture? I can "small" a connection but I can't place my fingers on it if you know what I mean.

    • @Kingofcrocs1
      @Kingofcrocs1 5 місяців тому

      Attachment theories is partly what Lacan in some ways went against in his theories

  • @CaptainBaat
    @CaptainBaat 6 місяців тому

    Amazing lecture, thank you for all of this

  • @nightoftheworld
    @nightoftheworld 6 місяців тому

    30:01 *Zizek’s materialism* “If we were to collectively reframe, as it were, our fantasmatic frame then reality itself would change.
    Hence, we are not the passive agents of a cruel reality and we have to flee into fantasy-it is that we are the active agents of fantasy and therein we can change reality.”

  • @kolmol9097
    @kolmol9097 6 місяців тому +3

    Did psychoanalysis take Michel Foucault's criticisms seriously? Does psychoanalysis deny the influence of the environment, surroundings, and society? Is a person's personality affected by experiences after childhood? Such as adolescence and youth

  • @maryreilly5102
    @maryreilly5102 6 місяців тому +6

    When are you going to interview zizek Julian?? its due!!!

    • @3f11f3
      @3f11f3 6 місяців тому +1

      It’s like the Talmud interviewing the Torah. Simcha!

    • @maryreilly5102
      @maryreilly5102 6 місяців тому +2

      @@3f11f3 regular people interview him all the time in youtube!

  • @muditha-Asanga-Hewage
    @muditha-Asanga-Hewage 5 місяців тому

    Why did you tell that ticklish subject is more important than sublime object of idealogy?

  • @candycane106
    @candycane106 6 місяців тому

    👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾 I wonder what you’d say about the movie I Saw the TV Glow

  • @whowereweagain
    @whowereweagain 4 місяці тому

    I read deleuze and guattari and they tell me I should be proud not to understand the psychoanalysis they are talking about in antioedipus, but here I am so I know and I thank you for the content to help me see what they were responding to.
    should the point not be to produce a happy and joyous subject? This destitution stuff sounds bad.

  • @haopowei
    @haopowei 6 місяців тому

    Sorry , I just want to clarify. Are ultimate fantasy and fundamental fantasy the same thing?

  • @whowereweagain
    @whowereweagain 4 місяці тому

    (post)structuralists have a lot to say about simulation and stuff and I have experimented with that very intensely, so I definitely know what they are talking about, besides their nonsensical semiology.Idk I think the Peirceian takes on iconicity and symbols and anti-nominalism is probs better for understanding that. Like Frederick Sterjnfelt talks about in diagrammotology. also, I like a thousand plateaus, that's a good book.

  • @tovialbores-falk3091
    @tovialbores-falk3091 3 місяці тому

    What is the evidence for any of this?

    • @plastic2666
      @plastic2666 23 дні тому

      Have you ever read The Sentiment of Rationality by William James?

  • @erdwaenor
    @erdwaenor 6 місяців тому

    *FAZEDORES DE BAÚS*
    Seguramente, não fez todas as Pérolas originais.
    Ainda assim, confeccionou um Baú para então as Amostrar.
    _Epistemic Gnomes_

  • @sina8883
    @sina8883 4 місяці тому +1

    Sheesh- The mental acrobatics you have to go through to obtain a sense of inner peace in the modern world….🙄

  • @zatoichiMiyamoto
    @zatoichiMiyamoto 6 місяців тому

    I thought about another movie, "Being John Malkovich"

  • @TheWay-u1n
    @TheWay-u1n 6 місяців тому

    You want to place the fantasy of hope at the center of your frame..
    Fishing..
    fisherman gather in liminal spaces discussing the frames and baits

    • @TheWay-u1n
      @TheWay-u1n 6 місяців тому

      Children free of parental guidance escape the frame..
      Lucifer unbound as the antichrist

    • @satyasyasatyasya5746
      @satyasyasatyasya5746 6 місяців тому +2

      i really hope you outgrow the edgelord stuff someday :)

    • @TheWay-u1n
      @TheWay-u1n 6 місяців тому

      @@satyasyasatyasya5746
      I am what everyone else wants to be..
      On point

    • @satyasyasatyasya5746
      @satyasyasatyasya5746 6 місяців тому +2

      @@TheWay-u1n oh its like a real life anime villain :P

  • @michaelyoon9355
    @michaelyoon9355 5 місяців тому

    Achieve the ego ideal.

  • @chrisrichardson8988
    @chrisrichardson8988 6 місяців тому +2

    All these Western jargony philosophies are watered down Buddhism.