It is the rich who wouldn't want fascism on his country, for fascism is the union of all classes in an organic State where they all have the same importance. In the fascism regime, the bourgeois are not the rulers, like in american capitalism that has americanized the world by now.
@@randomfag7050workers and farmers need to siege power, because those are the people who feed and keep a nation strong. Without farmers and breeders you don't have food supplies, without workers you don't have self-sufficiency. Also nation needs a strong ruler who will not use money and fame, but he will motivate his/her people to fight against the modern capitalist world
In fascism there are still rich people. And the state is an authocratic cleptocracy where the citizens have no rights and the powerful lack accountability. In modernity that sounds hellish, because it would be like China or an African regime.
@thermopylae85 It is not a painting. It is an actual photograph depicting a Makedonian Phalanx not a Spartan one. Its main characteristic is the four to seven long spear called 'Sarissa'.
I would believe that they already have, and in "The genealogy of morals", as you have stated Nietzsche does a good job of showing this. It matters what you define as "material existence", I mean they aren't something you can touch, or taste, but people can know the difference between something that is immoral, and moral without being taught it. Yes, I agree that its subjective, but there is certain values that are almost universal in their acceptance, such as the protection of innocents.
Sorry it took me 3 months to answer. Fascist were corporatist, “corpus” means body. Each class is a vital organ and the State is the body. It’s the idea of the Organic State, again, and that ideal of union and cooperation between all classes is what differs them from the Marxist, who believed there cannot be such state of cooperation. That was the main goal after all. Fascism inspired Portugal's Estatudo do Trabalho Nacional and Brazil's Carta do Trabalho.
MilitaIncognitus Which is proven a failure. The elite and the church betrayed Mussolini and arrested him. The german socialites too sabotaged the war effort and tried to murder the Fuhrer. In every country the burgeoise elite and the church ended up betraying the nationalistic/patriotic state/movement. Codreanu too, was murdered and his Iron Guard destroyed by the rich apatrids. In the case of Soviet Union, Stalin foreseeing this, purged the country, and the elite in the armed forces. Who was right? Who won the war? Never trust the borgeoise elite or the clerc!
@@Skullhead888 in spain the church didn't do anything to stop Franco (fascist spanish dictator) and they where also supporting hitler as that helped them to get influence and privileges in Germany. Also Vatican needed the nazi to submit the ortodox church. And they didn't arrest Mussolini, he was arrested by the king Victor Manuel. Actually, Hitler and Mussolini reached the power thanks to the church.
The social conditions that were institutionally established in the regimes I mentioned were such that fostered the type of individuality I spoke of, while maintaining a sense of duty and solidarity with the larger society or community. Conditions that inevitably would lead to upheaval, transformation, incessant becoming. Here the individual is divorced from each other, played off each other, which works only towards the greater cohesiveness of the controlling apparatus of pure capital over us.
And indeed individuality is retained, even in so called fascist or totalitarian regimes. My family has lived through an Imperial government (Austria-Hungary), a radical fascist government (Independent State of Croatia), and a One-party authoritarian communist rule (Yugoslavia). I've met grandparents and great aunts and uncles who had lived through all three, my own parents who lived through Yugoslavia.... and yet they seem to me to be more independent, more individual and thoughtful than...
@@exaggeratedswaggerofablackteen Apparently he has been subsumed and assimilated into the globalist gestalt mind. I miss nine years ago, when I only had a vague niggling idea that something is very wrong with the world, rather than the stark cold knowledge of the fact today. But that I could tell my past self to read everything published by Covington and Rockwell.
The unification of classes came from D'Annunzio's idea of an Organic State, where all classes are vital organs to a single organism, that is the State. That is not compatible with communism, because in a marxist society, at least in theory, the rulling class is the working class and in our society, the bourgeois are. Fascism inspired several countries across the world to have better laws for the working class as well.
Because the regime, or leaders in charge never intended to follow the ideology like it was supposed to be followed. Communism is a moneyless, stateless, classless form of governance, this is unachievable however due to the inherent greed that seems to inhabit the hearts of man. The Soviet Union's architects never intended to introduce real Communism, they simply wanted a system that devolved the entire non bourgeoisie to the same level, while retaining their power. Social engineering 101.
Individuality, can still be retained, while one pushes towards a common goal. People mistake the idea's of individualism for not being compatible with unity, when in fact it is. Mechanization in the sense that we are being turned into machines, look at factory workers, who do the same task 1000+ times in a day for barely enough pay to get by. Its not mechanized thought in the least, its reality, take a quick look at how important of a role biodiversity plays in life...
.. your average folk here, even college and university educated people, in the long capitalist dominated west. Yet all the people I've met who have lived through the unabashed community-first, totalitarian countries, who grew up in rigid conservative agricultural villages with little formal education - who are integral in the perseverance of the community - are more aggressively individualistic. So I agree, wholeheartedly, with you on this point. But, as you see, totalitarianism doesn't do harm.
Well, they certainly see themselves as such, they very likely believe that they are helping mankind, and that in helping themselves, they will push us towards a new better tomorrow. However, I would agree that the word is not entirely suited for representing those I sought to describe.
Some Europeans have wavy hair or (long locks) like those similar to depictions of angels in Christian/Roman art. Most have straight. Then there in crinky /stringy hair. I have wavy hair.
Individuality needs to be qualified. And if it is indeed our most important trait, that which gets us through "this crisis", then where does a common goal or vision that we must push forward toward together come in? The "mentality" that people share for each other - which I agree exists in some form - sounds a lot more group oriented than a defense of individualism. As to consciously wanted to be part of a particular community of people defined by certain features, how is that a mechanization?
The Eagle and Europe will no longer be separated. The cult of the sheep will no longer keep the lion enslaved and so Europe will free her sons. Her sons will be the lions, free once again. Do not refuse us our pagan roots.
Do you realize pagan Europeans fought each other non stop for pretty much their entire history. Because sure, Greeks, Romans, Celts and Germanic peoples all got along great.
@@nightwynd5663 christians fought one another also, I don't get the point. Is there anything wrong with war? Europe isn't exactly united per se. It has loads of different cultures, ethnicities, etc. Trying to unite them would mean dismissing their interests. Pagan Europeans simply acted on their own interest and behalf, which led to war.
Yes that all did happen, whether intentionally or not. Philanthropy, however, has positive connotations that are typically, at least consciously, self-less and oriented towards the good and benefit of man in general, not for the base pursuit of wealth and power for oneself. WW2 created more structures and institutions of control and domination, for a greater amount of people, than ever existed before. And, as you say, benefiting only a small minority of people.
They will be swept aside like pawns, because that's exactly what they are, I suppose you misunderstood the analogy. I mean it in the sense that those who are being used by the current establishment, as pawns, will be swept aside in the upcoming struggle, due to their inability to think for themselves. Some people are good, and some are bad, this is a fact of life, its not specific to race, or culture, but a part of the evolutionary struggle, excess fat if you will, from a long hibernation.
I don't deny people get caught up in what's around them. We all do it, on one level or another. But neither can one say the whole of a society was "tricked" or "duped". No one person or event is that dichotomous, lest they consciously affirm a dichotomy between themselves and each of their values and that of a supposed contrary other. It's true, only hard line members of the party where in this latter camp. One will go along with the ideas of anyone that fills their belly. No trickery needed.
40% is a great number, and if you have more parties running than two it is a very telling number. Their methods were entirely populace if you look at the rhetoric and propaganda, it appeals to a fallen people with promises of restoring THEIR glory, everything is about the nation and the people of the nation. And what did all the money go it? Public health, restoring the economy for the people, community binding and giving the populace pride in their history. .
Hopefully we as a species are starting to push away from this mechanization of our ideology's/feeling etc... Individuality is one of our mot important traits, and it will be what gets us through this upcoming crisis. Diversity of mental cogitation, and biological traits will be a deciding factor in the coming years. The drones who cant think for themselves, will be swept aside like pawns in a chess game, utilized to set up the moves of knights, and castles.
I agree that we are all being molded, but it doesn't have to be that way. The idea that we are unable as a species to achieve at least a somewhat of a utopia, is foolish, all it takes is a common goal, and a desire to push forward towards that goal together. Its not about constitutions, and governments, its about the mentality that the people share for each-other. We all need to realize that our species is more important then personal pursuits, we could be anything we want to be.
Anthropological studies might find evolutionary bases for certain values, morals or ethics. In fact, Nietzsche gives us a good rudimentary start to believe this (and thus to undermine any belief in a metaphysical and universal ground for any value system). Empirical facts, however, do not show the material existence of moral or ethical systems. Another problematic is that any particular value, moral or virtue can be characterized and actualized in any number of ways in different contexts.
No, I have most certainly not. A simple understanding of the benefits of social cohesion in groups of: Wolves, Primates, and other species; will easily show you how sharing is essential, and helpful. If we did not work together we would not have accomplished close to the feats we have; but that is not to say that I approve of giving to those who have given nothing, or wish to give nothing themselves. Communism is about removing the grip of the bourgeoisie on the working class.
But don't you see, saying something like that can just as easily be undermined by same said study into why you would believe that. The world is just a perpetual battleground of different perspectives. Some of which become universalized for a while, such as Christianity and its entire value system was. What we define as innocent today, was not innocent yesterday, and will not be innocent tomorrow, though the concept may remain.
Some of the best advances in sciences were accomplished by the germans in wwii and many look over that fact due the massive stain that was the holocaust. Its strange that the world sadly will never let the german people live it down, they don’t even go into depth on that period of history in their schools.
germany has probably the biggest white guilt of all the countries under ZOG occupation also germany has the hardest politics against EVERYONE who has right wing opinions and thinking... they will arrest you for it
I was taught like everybody else to hate the germans as a kid, I didn't hate them per se but I was unsure about them. Now that I've done research I respect the Germans immensely, I already admired german engineering since my dad always insisted on buying a BMW. I'm not white or liberal so I know I'm very much in the minority but I think it's a disgrace how much they've been slandered. I hope more people wake up to see the true culprits.
No, not everyone was tricked, people like George Orwell spoke of how war's would be used simply to further the power of a few, and to keep the control, in his masterpiece 1984. He also illuminated how Communism would ultimately fail (Animal Farm), because of the greed of the new bourgeoisie who raised up from the "working class", just as Marx predicted as well. Tho to be fair, the Soviet regime was not really from "the working class". Thus our problem, no commitment to our species.
I don't know what Fascism you are talking about, but it's in no way similar to that which was clearly outlined by Benito Mussolini in his early works (which cemented what is now modern Fascism). In reality, the unification of all classes is known as Communism, NOT Fascism, and it has been readily demonstrated by both sides, that Socialism/Communism are not compatible with Fascism.
If you require the masses to give your government legitimacy then you re populace oriented. And the US would get involved in what ever they could if it meant money, that is their history.
Failed before they reached their potential, because the individual will of its peoples decided on new forms of communal association? When's the last time Western capitalist states have experienced so many upheavals and experimentation on a grande societal scale? We're so deprecatingly subjectivized here, we can't hope to have any sort of communal goals outside of pure self-interest. America is already there, don't fret.
Where does my stance indicate that I am not willing to push along with science? Some people are good, and some bad, tho the terms may be subjective based on the perspective of those doing the labeling. A better way to label them is "negative, or positive". Evolutionary struggle creates morals, and ethics, which further the species which develop them to new levels. It has been demonstrated many times that empathy is a characteristic that benefits both party's in question.
I would agree, wholeheartedly. Hence the attraction of mass movements such as the Nazi party, Communism, etc. People get the sense that they want to be part of something greater than themselves. The people part of the former just realized they wanted to be part of a community of a particular type (i.e. that of a specific race and culture), and the latter in a community of a particular type (i.e. that of workers).
Funny thing, I wasn't talking about Hitler ;) If you could read properly (which you unfortunately can't), I clearly stated that they were not in the ranks of the common soldier; knowing Hitlers military past, that clearly excludes him. Maybe next time you should try to think before you insult me, I was in no way calling the Socialist movement Fascist, and you do yourself a great disfavor by construing my comment in such a way.
I find it problematic that you are not willing to push along with science, in that you believe there are good and bad people. Evolutionary struggle does not pay heed to morals or ethics, just look at all the scientific research out there that shows us this.
I bet that almost all of these hard hitting quotes are written by guys that complain about the weather when they go outside. Try reading some accounts from people who went to war, soldiers or civilians, take a deep breath and relax. You are not that type of person. The music is great though!
Well certainly if that is what you define Fascism as, then yes, but the standard view of Fascism is a Corporatist authoritarian entity which doesn't look out for the workers but the interests of a select few. A plutocracy of sorts. What examples can you give of 'Fascism' inspiring several country's to adopt better labor laws?
The Fascists were always there, just not in the ranks of the common soldier. No poor man would ever wish Fascism on his people, or Nation, but a rich man, lusting for greedy pursuits would. Rich men don't fight war's, they send the sons of the poor to do that.
![Arditi - Spirit of Sacrifice [Full Album]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/8V6_nWMLn1M/mqdefault.jpg)
![Arditi - Spirit of Sacrifice [Full Album]](/img/tr.png)
"For I have seen the throne of the gods and it was empty. What else could I do but call myself king?"
Caramba, quem disse isso?
@@Gustavinhocartanoso Corypheus. Vilão do Dragon Age Inquisition
@@d.pedroii2940 Perfeitamente. Kkk
Yes, king of the lowlives.
To the memories of the greatness of the past and the coming age of post humanity when our descendents become gods
It is foolish to become gods when you can save yourself and be good, to live amongst them once you die
"amongst them"
no such thing
Prelest maxxing
To bask in the glory is to bask in the heavenly realm.
It is the rich who wouldn't want fascism on his country, for fascism is the union of all classes in an organic State where they all have the same importance. In the fascism regime, the bourgeois are not the rulers, like in american capitalism that has americanized the world by now.
The burgeois are the fascists best Friends. All their money came from them
america=shit
Hey from 2023 it seems even worse
@@randomfag7050workers and farmers need to siege power, because those are the people who feed and keep a nation strong. Without farmers and breeders you don't have food supplies, without workers you don't have self-sufficiency. Also nation needs a strong ruler who will not use money and fame, but he will motivate his/her people to fight against the modern capitalist world
In fascism there are still rich people. And the state is an authocratic cleptocracy where the citizens have no rights and the powerful lack accountability. In modernity that sounds hellish, because it would be like China or an African regime.
True science does push for the limits, always, and forever.
I wish you all the best in the future! Cheers.
great work.
all are in an extreme place.
@thermopylae85 It is not a painting. It is an actual photograph depicting a Makedonian Phalanx not a Spartan one. Its main characteristic is the four to seven long spear called 'Sarissa'.
I love all these songs! So beautiful.
I would believe that they already have, and in "The genealogy of morals", as you have stated Nietzsche does a good job of showing this. It matters what you define as "material existence", I mean they aren't something you can touch, or taste, but people can know the difference between something that is immoral, and moral without being taught it. Yes, I agree that its subjective, but there is certain values that are almost universal in their acceptance, such as the protection of innocents.
Sorry it took me 3 months to answer. Fascist were corporatist, “corpus” means body. Each class is a vital organ and the State is the body. It’s the idea of the Organic State, again, and that ideal of union and cooperation between all classes is what differs them from the Marxist, who believed there cannot be such state of cooperation. That was the main goal after all.
Fascism inspired Portugal's Estatudo do Trabalho Nacional and Brazil's Carta do Trabalho.
a truer equality there has rarely been
MilitaIncognitus Which is proven a failure. The elite and the church betrayed Mussolini and arrested him. The german socialites too sabotaged the war effort and tried to murder the Fuhrer. In every country the burgeoise elite and the church ended up betraying the nationalistic/patriotic state/movement. Codreanu too, was murdered and his Iron Guard destroyed by the rich apatrids.
In the case of Soviet Union, Stalin foreseeing this, purged the country, and the elite in the armed forces. Who was right? Who won the war? Never trust the borgeoise elite or the clerc!
+Skullhead888 Marxism is antiwhite and is not an option for the European people.
@@Skullhead888 in spain the church didn't do anything to stop Franco (fascist spanish dictator) and they where also supporting hitler as that helped them to get influence and privileges in Germany. Also Vatican needed the nazi to submit the ortodox church. And they didn't arrest Mussolini, he was arrested by the king Victor Manuel. Actually, Hitler and Mussolini reached the power thanks to the church.
@@golz9785 Congrats. You commentary is the most hilarious that I've ever read since I first enter the internet.
The social conditions that were institutionally established in the regimes I mentioned were such that fostered the type of individuality I spoke of, while maintaining a sense of duty and solidarity with the larger society or community. Conditions that inevitably would lead to upheaval, transformation, incessant becoming. Here the individual is divorced from each other, played off each other, which works only towards the greater cohesiveness of the controlling apparatus of pure capital over us.
And indeed individuality is retained, even in so called fascist or totalitarian regimes. My family has lived through an Imperial government (Austria-Hungary), a radical fascist government (Independent State of Croatia), and a One-party authoritarian communist rule (Yugoslavia). I've met grandparents and great aunts and uncles who had lived through all three, my own parents who lived through Yugoslavia.... and yet they seem to me to be more independent, more individual and thoughtful than...
WOW, INCREDIBLY BEAUTIFUL. my very soul can feel it.
HELLAS
Blood of Conqueror.
finally starting to sound like Arditi again.
The theme song for Autocracy in Europa.
7 years after, how do you feel about this comment ? How's being life ?
@@exaggeratedswaggerofablackteen Apparently he has been subsumed and assimilated into the globalist gestalt mind. I miss nine years ago, when I only had a vague niggling idea that something is very wrong with the world, rather than the stark cold knowledge of the fact today. But that I could tell my past self to read everything published by Covington and Rockwell.
Martial industrial, says the enciclopedy about this music,......IS GREAT
2:39 do somebody know the name of that statue?
Alexander der Groβe by Arno Breker.
The unification of classes came from D'Annunzio's idea of an Organic State, where all classes are vital organs to a single organism, that is the State. That is not compatible with communism, because in a marxist society, at least in theory, the rulling class is the working class and in our society, the bourgeois are. Fascism inspired several countries across the world to have better laws for the working class as well.
Great music btw ^_^
amazing....
Because the regime, or leaders in charge never intended to follow the ideology like it was supposed to be followed. Communism is a moneyless, stateless, classless form of governance, this is unachievable however due to the inherent greed that seems to inhabit the hearts of man. The Soviet Union's architects never intended to introduce real Communism, they simply wanted a system that devolved the entire non bourgeoisie to the same level, while retaining their power. Social engineering 101.
You as well, best wishes.
2:40 what statue?
Should be one of Arno Breker's statues, Alexander the Great.
Destiny awaits.
Individuality, can still be retained, while one pushes towards a common goal. People mistake the idea's of individualism for not being compatible with unity, when in fact it is. Mechanization in the sense that we are being turned into machines, look at factory workers, who do the same task 1000+ times in a day for barely enough pay to get by. Its not mechanized thought in the least, its reality, take a quick look at how important of a role biodiversity plays in life...
.. your average folk here, even college and university educated people, in the long capitalist dominated west. Yet all the people I've met who have lived through the unabashed community-first, totalitarian countries, who grew up in rigid conservative agricultural villages with little formal education - who are integral in the perseverance of the community - are more aggressively individualistic. So I agree, wholeheartedly, with you on this point. But, as you see, totalitarianism doesn't do harm.
Τὸ πεπρωμένον ἑνὸς Μύθου...
really nice, keep the good work
Шикарно.
Ο ΑΛΕΞΑΝΔΡΟΣ ΖΕΙ
Alexander the Great ,the Greek King,the greatest man in human history!
@thermopylae85 That looks like a scene from the movie 300
Well, they certainly see themselves as such, they very likely believe that they are helping mankind, and that in helping themselves, they will push us towards a new better tomorrow. However, I would agree that the word is not entirely suited for representing those I sought to describe.
People call me a )eew when my hair looks Ike 3:20 but I have zero in me
Some Europeans have wavy hair or (long locks) like those similar to depictions of angels in Christian/Roman art. Most have straight. Then there in crinky /stringy hair. I have wavy hair.
You are a horse ?
Who made Spartan painting at 2:15?
Individuality needs to be qualified. And if it is indeed our most important trait, that which gets us through "this crisis", then where does a common goal or vision that we must push forward toward together come in? The "mentality" that people share for each other - which I agree exists in some form - sounds a lot more group oriented than a defense of individualism. As to consciously wanted to be part of a particular community of people defined by certain features, how is that a mechanization?
The Eagle and Europe will no longer be separated. The cult of the sheep will no longer keep the lion enslaved and so Europe will free her sons. Her sons will be the lions, free once again. Do not refuse us our pagan roots.
Do you elaborate little bit too
Do you realize pagan Europeans fought each other non stop for pretty much their entire history. Because sure, Greeks, Romans, Celts and Germanic peoples all got along great.
@@nightwynd5663 christians fought one another also, I don't get the point.
Is there anything wrong with war? Europe isn't exactly united per se. It has loads of different cultures, ethnicities, etc. Trying to unite them would mean dismissing their interests. Pagan Europeans simply acted on their own interest and behalf, which led to war.
@@Dacia52 My point is that whole idea of "united Europe against non Europeans" some people here have is absolutely idiotic.
@@nightwynd5663 It is idiotic though, I agree.
Europe was never united. Nor will it ever be willingly united.
Yes that all did happen, whether intentionally or not. Philanthropy, however, has positive connotations that are typically, at least consciously, self-less and oriented towards the good and benefit of man in general, not for the base pursuit of wealth and power for oneself. WW2 created more structures and institutions of control and domination, for a greater amount of people, than ever existed before. And, as you say, benefiting only a small minority of people.
BESA!
ti svisa
They will be swept aside like pawns, because that's exactly what they are, I suppose you misunderstood the analogy. I mean it in the sense that those who are being used by the current establishment, as pawns, will be swept aside in the upcoming struggle, due to their inability to think for themselves. Some people are good, and some are bad, this is a fact of life, its not specific to race, or culture, but a part of the evolutionary struggle, excess fat if you will, from a long hibernation.
I don't deny people get caught up in what's around them. We all do it, on one level or another. But neither can one say the whole of a society was "tricked" or "duped". No one person or event is that dichotomous, lest they consciously affirm a dichotomy between themselves and each of their values and that of a supposed contrary other. It's true, only hard line members of the party where in this latter camp. One will go along with the ideas of anyone that fills their belly. No trickery needed.
40% is a great number, and if you have more parties running than two it is a very telling number. Their methods were entirely populace if you look at the rhetoric and propaganda, it appeals to a fallen people with promises of restoring THEIR glory, everything is about the nation and the people of the nation. And what did all the money go it? Public health, restoring the economy for the people, community binding and giving the populace pride in their history. .
Hopefully we as a species are starting to push away from this mechanization of our ideology's/feeling etc... Individuality is one of our mot important traits, and it will be what gets us through this upcoming crisis. Diversity of mental cogitation, and biological traits will be a deciding factor in the coming years. The drones who cant think for themselves, will be swept aside like pawns in a chess game, utilized to set up the moves of knights, and castles.
I agree that we are all being molded, but it doesn't have to be that way. The idea that we are unable as a species to achieve at least a somewhat of a utopia, is foolish, all it takes is a common goal, and a desire to push forward towards that goal together. Its not about constitutions, and governments, its about the mentality that the people share for each-other. We all need to realize that our species is more important then personal pursuits, we could be anything we want to be.
That's what religion is for.
Anthropological studies might find evolutionary bases for certain values, morals or ethics. In fact, Nietzsche gives us a good rudimentary start to believe this (and thus to undermine any belief in a metaphysical and universal ground for any value system). Empirical facts, however, do not show the material existence of moral or ethical systems. Another problematic is that any particular value, moral or virtue can be characterized and actualized in any number of ways in different contexts.
No, I have most certainly not. A simple understanding of the benefits of social cohesion in groups of: Wolves, Primates, and other species; will easily show you how sharing is essential, and helpful. If we did not work together we would not have accomplished close to the feats we have; but that is not to say that I approve of giving to those who have given nothing, or wish to give nothing themselves. Communism is about removing the grip of the bourgeoisie on the working class.
But don't you see, saying something like that can just as easily be undermined by same said study into why you would believe that. The world is just a perpetual battleground of different perspectives. Some of which become universalized for a while, such as Christianity and its entire value system was. What we define as innocent today, was not innocent yesterday, and will not be innocent tomorrow, though the concept may remain.
Since martial music has not flute and string instruments, it means it's legal in islam?
Some of the best advances in sciences were accomplished by the germans in wwii and many look over that fact due the massive stain that was the holocaust. Its strange that the world sadly will never let the german people live it down, they don’t even go into depth on that period of history in their schools.
germany has probably the biggest white guilt of all the countries under ZOG occupation also
germany has the hardest politics against EVERYONE who has right wing opinions and thinking... they will arrest you for it
I was taught like everybody else to hate the germans as a kid, I didn't hate them per se but I was unsure about them. Now that I've done research I respect the Germans immensely, I already admired german engineering since my dad always insisted on buying a BMW. I'm not white or liberal so I know I'm very much in the minority but I think it's a disgrace how much they've been slandered. I hope more people wake up to see the true culprits.
what's the statue from 2:38?
+Ernest Lewicki Arno Breker's Alexander der Große.
No, not everyone was tricked, people like George Orwell spoke of how war's would be used simply to further the power of a few, and to keep the control, in his masterpiece 1984. He also illuminated how Communism would ultimately fail (Animal Farm), because of the greed of the new bourgeoisie who raised up from the "working class", just as Marx predicted as well. Tho to be fair, the Soviet regime was not really from "the working class". Thus our problem, no commitment to our species.
I don't know what Fascism you are talking about, but it's in no way similar to that which was clearly outlined by Benito Mussolini in his early works (which cemented what is now modern Fascism). In reality, the unification of all classes is known as Communism, NOT Fascism, and it has been readily demonstrated by both sides, that Socialism/Communism are not compatible with Fascism.
On that front.
Nobody uses pieces of metal, as their instruments. Except FNV.
If you require the masses to give your government legitimacy then you re populace oriented. And the US would get involved in what ever they could if it meant money, that is their history.
Failed before they reached their potential, because the individual will of its peoples decided on new forms of communal association? When's the last time Western capitalist states have experienced so many upheavals and experimentation on a grande societal scale? We're so deprecatingly subjectivized here, we can't hope to have any sort of communal goals outside of pure self-interest. America is already there, don't fret.
Where does my stance indicate that I am not willing to push along with science? Some people are good, and some bad, tho the terms may be subjective based on the perspective of those doing the labeling. A better way to label them is "negative, or positive". Evolutionary struggle creates morals, and ethics, which further the species which develop them to new levels. It has been demonstrated many times that empathy is a characteristic that benefits both party's in question.
*Claps
I would agree, wholeheartedly. Hence the attraction of mass movements such as the Nazi party, Communism, etc. People get the sense that they want to be part of something greater than themselves. The people part of the former just realized they wanted to be part of a community of a particular type (i.e. that of a specific race and culture), and the latter in a community of a particular type (i.e. that of workers).
too human. Don't push for the limits.... cede yourself to the dictates of science.
Funny thing, I wasn't talking about Hitler ;)
If you could read properly (which you unfortunately can't), I clearly stated that they were not in the ranks of the common soldier; knowing Hitlers military past, that clearly excludes him. Maybe next time you should try to think before you insult me, I was in no way calling the Socialist movement Fascist, and you do yourself a great disfavor by construing my comment in such a way.
Destroying new culture! Forza!
Weird way to spend your money as a philanthropist :P
I find it problematic that you are not willing to push along with science, in that you believe there are good and bad people. Evolutionary struggle does not pay heed to morals or ethics, just look at all the scientific research out there that shows us this.
I bet that almost all of these hard hitting quotes are written by guys that complain about the weather when they go outside. Try reading some accounts from people who went to war, soldiers or civilians, take a deep breath and relax. You are not that type of person. The music is great though!
The quotes from their songs are all from military leaders of many nations of different times in history, but mostly ww2
Alexander the great phalanx 5 meter long 😉
Alexander was great until he died, his empire broke down in less than 10 years and Macedon was eventually made a bitch Roman province
Товарищ жуков вас не успокоил?
@@franzliszt6464 счастливого пути. Я рад что жуков твой. Туда вам обоим и дорога. Хаа ха ха
@@franzliszt6464 счастливого пути
Well certainly if that is what you define Fascism as, then yes, but the standard view of Fascism is a Corporatist authoritarian entity which doesn't look out for the workers but the interests of a select few. A plutocracy of sorts. What examples can you give of 'Fascism' inspiring several country's to adopt better labor laws?
The Fascists were always there, just not in the ranks of the common soldier. No poor man would ever wish Fascism on his people, or Nation, but a rich man, lusting for greedy pursuits would. Rich men don't fight war's, they send the sons of the poor to do that.