F-104 vs Enterprise(zervos archive).avi

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 сер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 555

  • @danielbritton8588
    @danielbritton8588 3 роки тому +178

    My favorite episode. I always got pumped seeing that jet at the start. It was magic thinking they were in my time period. I was a big 12 inch G.I. Joe fan & mine was the action pilot. What a great Christmas that was.

    • @GeneralGeorgeS.PattonJr.
      @GeneralGeorgeS.PattonJr. Рік тому +5

      I see you're also a fan of my favorite sci-fi film, Dan.

    • @patrickvanrinsvelt4466
      @patrickvanrinsvelt4466 Рік тому +7

      Did you get the GI Joe with the Mercury Capsule? I had over of those. Hot Wheels Fat Track too.

    • @39KHall
      @39KHall Рік тому +3

      @@patrickvanrinsvelt4466 I had the GI Joe with the Mercury capsule. It was excellent.

    • @2NDCBT
      @2NDCBT Рік тому +1

      OMG I had the same Gi Joe pilot wearing basically the same uniform! I would get him out reenact the scenes when this was on TV!

    • @2nostromo
      @2nostromo Рік тому +1

      I was 9 and got a 3" refracting telescope that Christmas. Everything was possible. Even breaking the cosmic speed limit and a schism in Time itself. Aw take me back. I'm ready. Lets all go back

  • @davidian7787
    @davidian7787 6 років тому +131

    The tractor beam is breaking it up!!
    I havnae turned it on yet Captain.
    F104 widowmaker in action.

    • @Smenkhaare
      @Smenkhaare Місяць тому +2

      Yep... didn't they determine that the wings were too stubby and the engines too powerful that rendered the air frame very unstable in flight. It killed so many pilots.

  • @skytowergnome4664
    @skytowergnome4664 Рік тому +22

    Come to think of it, it's a good think he didn't see the top of the saucer section and report that he could read "USS Enterprise"

    • @armyboy0579
      @armyboy0579 Рік тому

      They will probably assume it's some commie weapon

    • @B-and-O-Operator-Fairmont
      @B-and-O-Operator-Fairmont 5 місяців тому +5

      "What the Hell is an aircraft carrier doing up HERE?!!"

  • @NoferTrunions
    @NoferTrunions 5 років тому +144

    Some sweet stock footage of the F104. Back then it was _the_ Bad Ass fighter.

    • @cameraman655
      @cameraman655 4 роки тому +6

      Nofer Trunions Yeah but tough to fly, I believe that it was tagged with the nickname ”Widow Maker” by some pilots.

    • @NoferTrunions
      @NoferTrunions 4 роки тому +4

      @@cameraman655 Absolutely, did you know it was the basis for the U2? Kelly Johnson figured, "Hey, I could put glider wings on this and..." I believe a privately owned F104 set a sealevel speed record (those are very difficult, fighters can only reach their max speed at altitude.) I think the F15 was something like Mach 1.25 @ sealevel (or something like that.) I don't know what project it was (could hve been the U2) but KJ was supposed to scrap all the tooling for some fighter L manufactured but he decided to save it and ended up using it. Don't remember any other details on that one.

    • @cameraman655
      @cameraman655 4 роки тому +2

      Nofer Trunions Yep, I am a huge fan of Kelly's flying wonders.

    • @johnkelinske1449
      @johnkelinske1449 3 роки тому +2

      It served several nations including Germany and Japan.

    • @keithroy9217
      @keithroy9217 3 роки тому

      Read the combat reports from India v Pakistan 1965. It was a dead loss.

  • @alanmiell6754
    @alanmiell6754 3 роки тому +62

    This was one of my Favourite Episodes as a kidd , also the Saturn five Episode as well, cannot beat the original series

  • @Anthony-qj7qe
    @Anthony-qj7qe Рік тому +29

    This has gotta be the best Star trek opening ever....simply awesome. 👍👍

    • @GeneralGeorgeS.PattonJr.
      @GeneralGeorgeS.PattonJr. Рік тому +7

      People watching it back in the day, probably thought they had the wrong channel... "Where the HELL is Star Trek?"😆

    • @CaptApril123
      @CaptApril123 5 місяців тому +3

      @@GeneralGeorgeS.PattonJr. I was going to post that.. As a kid this opening really confused me but I thought it was cool

  • @cameraman655
    @cameraman655 Рік тому +24

    Of all of the episodes and of all of the series and ST films ever made this was the one that hooked me on Star Trek. To this day, this is still my favorite episode, bar none.

    • @jaybee9269
      @jaybee9269 8 місяців тому +2

      Better than “Journey to Babel”?

  • @craigg4246
    @craigg4246 Рік тому +52

    I was friends witth a Lockheed test pilot for the F104. He told me some great stories about it. He went on to be an SR71 test pilot. He said he was selected to fly the Blackbird because he had more time in the F104 than anyone else, and that anyone that could fly the F104 could fly the Blackbird.

    • @matthewcaughey8898
      @matthewcaughey8898 9 місяців тому +2

      Makes sense as both were very unforgiving jets

    • @fantabuloussnuffaluffagus
      @fantabuloussnuffaluffagus 8 місяців тому

      I never heard that either Tony or Fish ever flew the Blackbird. Who are you talking about?

    • @Smenkhaare
      @Smenkhaare Місяць тому +1

      He was definitely safer in the SR-71 than in the F-104....

  • @animeturnMMD
    @animeturnMMD 3 роки тому +78

    I think the radar operators would be more than confused to see an object of the size of a battleship, flying around in the air zone, I think they would believe the radar is broken.

    • @petersonlafollette3521
      @petersonlafollette3521 2 роки тому +6

      Scene is very futuristic in how conventional aircraft try I.D. and pursue UFO's except alien response sequence would not be so slow to identify- but instantaneous. Documented cases show pursuit plane is either vaporized, disappears, or crashes.

    • @atgdcommish608
      @atgdcommish608 Рік тому +6

      Documented cases show the pursuit plane capturing the UAP on video for a while, then being unable to keep up with it, with no hostile action by the UAP.

    • @quazmodic
      @quazmodic 6 місяців тому

      Radar in the 60s did not report the size of objects.

    • @animeturnMMD
      @animeturnMMD 6 місяців тому

      @@quazmodic Well but still it would look like a big bloop in the screen, perhaps?

    • @quazmodic
      @quazmodic 6 місяців тому

      @@animeturnMMD No

  • @Mega12AX7
    @Mega12AX7 4 роки тому +69

    How appropriate Starfighter meets Star trek, 👍😁

    • @rogerlynch5279
      @rogerlynch5279 6 місяців тому

      Especially if you think at all those UFO -tales :)

  • @blastech4095
    @blastech4095 6 років тому +81

    The type of nuclear yield available to a F-104 of the time would be 1.5 kilotons for the nuclear-tipped AIR-2A Genie, an unguided rocket with a range of almost 10 km.
    The fighter could also carry unguided gravity bombs which could range in yield from 70 kilotons to 1.45 megatons.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_F-104_Starfighter

    • @blastech4095
      @blastech4095 4 роки тому +4

      @reverse thrust Cheers for the correction. I must have skimmed through the article or misread it at the time I posted. Fixed the post :)

    • @dogsbd
      @dogsbd 2 роки тому +5

      The F-104 was tested with the Genie but never made operational with it.

    • @sealevel51
      @sealevel51 2 роки тому +2

      Congratulations. You can Google.

    • @TimmyBoyAZ
      @TimmyBoyAZ Рік тому +1

      @@dogsbd Respectfully, I disagree regarding the "operational" aspect of your statement. My understanding from a pilot with over 5,000 hours in the 104 is that a single limited yeild nuke could be mounted under the center hard point. Whether it was and to what extent during training is classified, so he wouldn't divulge that information, but he was stationed at Ramstein AFB in the mid-1970s at the time.

    • @dogsbd
      @dogsbd Рік тому +2

      @@TimmyBoyAZ The F-104 was operational with free fall nuclear bombs but I was referencing the Genie nuclear air to air missile in my statement.

  • @andrewemery4272
    @andrewemery4272 11 місяців тому +8

    How to own a Starfighter:
    Buy a piece of land, and wait...

  • @daffidavit
    @daffidavit 5 років тому +58

    The strap on Capt. Christopher's oxygen mask is the same type of strap used by Buzz Aldrin when he wore his Omega Speedmaster as the first person to ever wear a watch on the Lunar Surface. Neil Armstrong kept his Speedmaster hanging on the LM so he could time the creators as landmarks for timing his flight path. Both were .321 cal Omega Speedmasters. The strap was extra long so that it could be wrapped around the outside of his spacesuit. I'm an Apollo 11 nurd and a Speedmaster owner of a pre-lunar model .861 cal purchased in 1969 before the July landing. The .321 cal was just changed over in Oct. 1968 to the newer .861 cal model. The .321s are hard to come by but the 861s had a higher beat frequency from 18 to 21 kz. But Omega very recently started to remake the .321 cal. with a Platinum case. It's presently selling for about $9.800. U.S. as of Aug. 2019. For anybody who cares. The .861 was redesigned from the .321 Lemania movement used in the Patek Philippe watches back in the day. Although the .321 was more difficult to make, the .861 was easier to produce and was more accurate. But a true Omega Moonwatch was the .321 cal Lemonia movement, not the .861 which was later adapted by NASA for subsequent moon missions. So, the .861 was still considered an original moonwatch. Mine is now 50 years old and it still works. Yes, I had it "tuned up" in 1990 for $300 U.S. Omega gave me a newer watchband and new pushers and rubber seals. But they also returned the original parts to me except the original watch band. Nobody, not even Omega back in the 80s knew the Speedmaster would become such an iconic watch.

    • @RCAvhstape
      @RCAvhstape 3 роки тому +4

      I have a relative who got one when he was in the Navy in the mid 60s before Apollo 11 landed. He paid like 75 bucks for it. Still has it, still works fine. It's been serviced two or three times since then. When you got yours serviced did they freshen up the lume paint? After 50+ years it's pretty faded and only glows for a few minutes after being in the sun.

    • @jimmytgoose476
      @jimmytgoose476 2 роки тому +8

      Possibly the dullest comment I've ever seen on UA-cam 🤣

    • @henryhallmann4282
      @henryhallmann4282 Рік тому +3

      I’ve got two of them!

    • @DARisse-ji1yw
      @DARisse-ji1yw 11 місяців тому +2

      ​@@jimmytgoose476
      I found it interesting !

    • @guyfawkesuThe1
      @guyfawkesuThe1 11 місяців тому +1

      This would have been Offutt AFB, Nebraska, the former home of SAC (Strategic Air Command - nukes). At the time, very authentic.

  • @williampilling2168
    @williampilling2168 Рік тому +78

    It's fun that the F-104 just happened to be called the Starfighter.

    • @razorburn645
      @razorburn645 Рік тому +6

      Behold the legendary lawn dart.

    • @dennisyoung4631
      @dennisyoung4631 11 місяців тому +1

      “… type 31 interceptor… “
      Aka the *widowmaker.*
      Inspired, loosely, by the F104….

    • @wilfredrowanserilo3234
      @wilfredrowanserilo3234 11 місяців тому +2

      ​@razorburn645 aka the flying pencil

    • @user-dq5xx9hi4q
      @user-dq5xx9hi4q 5 місяців тому +2

      Fondly called the "Missile with a man in it". At the time this episode was made I had one I built hanging from my bedroom ceiling. Coolest jet I ever saw at the time. It would be 1 or 2 more years before I discovered the insane SR-71.

    • @user-tt6il2up4o
      @user-tt6il2up4o 3 місяці тому +1

      Widowmaker was its other name

  • @danclark1348
    @danclark1348 5 років тому +58

    The first airing of this episode, I thought " what happened to my show?" Thinking the tv station substituted a military show. Upon seeing the Enterprise, it was WOW! I didn't know much of any "Vulcan details" about aeronautics, tractor beams, transportors then.

    • @Andrei613
      @Andrei613 3 роки тому +11

      Given that the pace of producing a weekly US TV series in the 60s was very quick, it was impressive that Star Trek managed to do so well in their use of specific stock footage, such as all the filmed F-104 shots in this episode and all the Saturn V shots used in Assignment Earth.
      The staff paid attention to such details. Unlike some other shows. I recall seeing a sequence in one Six Million $ Man episode where Steve was taking off, flying and landing in a fighter jet, and no less than three very different looking planes were shown.

    • @Name-ps9fx
      @Name-ps9fx 2 роки тому +5

      That was my thought exactly! I was expecting anything Star Trek, and was slightly disappointed when I saw the f-104... But hey I like planes too so I watched and OMG my two favorite subjects put together the same show!

    • @Ballsarama
      @Ballsarama Рік тому +4

      Absolutely right! I was wondering where Star Trek went to...and then I first heard the theme music and saw the Enterprise...very nicely done opening.

    • @B-and-O-Operator-Fairmont
      @B-and-O-Operator-Fairmont Рік тому +1

      I thought the very same thing in 1974! Star Trek aired every afternoon at 3 or 4 o'clock on one of the local stations that summer. I nearly turned off the set to go back outside for some more bike riding when I heard the first strains of "Star Trek" music at 0:35.

  • @elliotwhiteside2827
    @elliotwhiteside2827 3 роки тому +6

    OMG i love those F104 starfighters, I have a whole dvd about them which were retired in 1984

  • @2NDCBT
    @2NDCBT Рік тому +6

    One of my favorite episodes! When I was young and saw this on TV, I had a Gi Joe pilot wearing the same uniform! I would get him out and reenact this scene when this was on! 😂

  • @hyacinthlynch843
    @hyacinthlynch843 Рік тому +8

    I love the way Mr. Spock says "interceptor."

    • @ScottGammans
      @ScottGammans 5 місяців тому +2

      The SENsors have picked up an… interCEPtor. Love the Nimoy phrasing!

  • @mottopanukeiku7406
    @mottopanukeiku7406 Рік тому +36

    Gotta be one of the most beautiful jet aircraft ever built!

    • @haroldhumerickhouse7904
      @haroldhumerickhouse7904 11 місяців тому +3

      And a very dangerous aircraft to fly. Many pilots died flying the F-104

    • @WardenWolf
      @WardenWolf 11 місяців тому +1

      @@haroldhumerickhouse7904 It was mostly a matter of training. Most early jets were very dangerous to fly by modern standards due to having unusual quirks. That's what happens when you're on the bleeding edge of technology and in experimental territory. Once they figured out how to properly train for the F-104, and installed a better ejection system, the accident and fatality rate dropped dramatically. The F-104 was an excellent aircraft for its role and time; you just can't compare it to stuff that came later after they fully figured out what they were doing.

    • @rogerminost6945
      @rogerminost6945 10 місяців тому

      widowmaker, I saw these aup close in 1972@@haroldhumerickhouse7904

    • @fantabuloussnuffaluffagus
      @fantabuloussnuffaluffagus 8 місяців тому +1

      @@haroldhumerickhouse7904 Many beautiful things are also dangerous. The F-104 was a bleeding edge, ground breaking, high performance fighter, it held speed, altitude, and time to climb records all at once, That said, the F-104 had a better safety record than the F-84 that preceded it. Flying jets was a hazardous profession back then.

    • @donovanjones4175
      @donovanjones4175 5 місяців тому +1

      They were terrifying to pilot. Dangerous widowmakers but all fighters of that era were

  • @umberct
    @umberct Рік тому +13

    I understand these aircraft were a nightmare but they sure did look cool as hell.

    • @1337penguinman
      @1337penguinman Рік тому +2

      They were great for what they were designed to do. Just tech at that time was moving so fast they really didn't have time to make a name for themselves.

    • @razorburn645
      @razorburn645 Рік тому +3

      ​@@1337penguinmanIt's rather shocking how fast we went through new planes back then. We went from the Gloster Meteor in 1944 to F8 Crusaders and F4 Phantoms II in 1957/58. That's less time than my country has had it's F18 fleet.

  • @mudduck754
    @mudduck754 Рік тому +6

    The shot of the Enterprise coming up through the clouds @1:47 has been the wallpaper on my laptop for years.

    • @Cr4z3d
      @Cr4z3d Рік тому +2

      Good taste.

  • @joeford860
    @joeford860 5 років тому +54

    F-104 Star Fighter a rocket with stubby wings.

    • @bobblum5973
      @bobblum5973 3 роки тому +2

      Also referred to as "the missile with a man in it", if I recall.
      As for rocket power, check out the NF-104A:
      en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_NF-104A

    • @mshotz1
      @mshotz1 3 роки тому +3

      @@bobblum5973 Also called "The Widow Maker"
      Two squadrons sent to Vietnam, 14 planes lost in action, zero kills

    • @throwback19841
      @throwback19841 3 роки тому +1

      "Sir, I don't understand how that crazy thing can even fly with that ridiculous, outlandish otherworldly layout and almost non-existent wings" "Soldier now is not the time to criticize the F-104 program, we have a UFO to catch"

  • @bitukukuasukgremany3
    @bitukukuasukgremany3 6 років тому +17

    I always loved this music like you're running out of time..How apt

  • @klbax63
    @klbax63 9 місяців тому +4

    Always loved seeing the Enterprise in this episode flying through the blue sky and clouds

    • @geoffreydy9739
      @geoffreydy9739 6 місяців тому

      The Enterprise, flying in modern earth 🌎.

  • @dmutant2635
    @dmutant2635 Рік тому +6

    Two of my favorite aircraft in one show!

  • @daffidavit
    @daffidavit 5 років тому +7

    The voice speaking in the beginning of this segment on the radio talking to "Bluejay 4" is the same actor who played the senior security guard who questioned Capt. Kirk after he and Sulu beamed down to the air force base and were arrested by the air force security team.

  • @chuniquepaceno470
    @chuniquepaceno470 Рік тому +3

    I initially thought this would be a mock battle between the air force and CVN-65, my first ship in the Navy, so it was pretty amusing to see the the Star Trek ship come out of the clouds.

    • @armyboy0579
      @armyboy0579 Рік тому +1

      I just randomly got this video recommended thinking the same thing or if it was Star Trek.

  • @jerrysolomon7623
    @jerrysolomon7623 6 років тому +18

    when this episode first aired our power went out and i missed it and i did not see it for about twenty years

    • @orbitingeyes2540
      @orbitingeyes2540 6 років тому +2

      Jerry Solomon: Obviously the work of ALIENS!

    • @jerrysolomon7623
      @jerrysolomon7623 6 років тому +1

      or time travelers

    • @clearingbaffles
      @clearingbaffles 6 років тому +1

      Jerry Solomon I kept missing reruns of Tholian Web

    • @charlesneely
      @charlesneely 6 років тому +1

      Jerry Solomon damn dude that was f***** up but you know a lot of stations all we did a reap are of shows like on the weekends

    • @coloradostrong
      @coloradostrong 3 роки тому

      Do you mean your power was off for 20 years? Running windmills are ya?

  • @punkrockpub
    @punkrockpub 11 років тому +20

    One of my faourite episodes!!! Many thanks for sharing!!! :-)

  • @ulissesfilhos1225
    @ulissesfilhos1225 3 роки тому +1

    Lembrei da parte da Jornada nas Estrelas, assisti esta parte qd tinha 8 anos de idade em 1978.Ulisses de Campinas São Paulo.

  • @woodychadick5905
    @woodychadick5905 3 роки тому +10

    Another good one is when they jack with a saturn 5 right before launch. Good times, good times.

  • @Terry-hm4bs
    @Terry-hm4bs 10 місяців тому +1

    😂 My Dad used to work on those planes when he was in the Air Force. He was so good he even had a plane named after him.

  • @richardmitchell3037
    @richardmitchell3037 Рік тому +8

    Although the F-104 was know as "The widow maker" The Spanish Air Force (Ejercito del Aire) operated 21 F-104s for seven years (1965-1972) without a single loss.

    • @billsanders5067
      @billsanders5067 Рік тому +2

      The F104 was designed by Kelly Johnson and the skunk works to be deployed as a high speed high altitude interceptor. The West German Air Force used the plane as a low altitude low speed ground attack weapon, something it was never designed for. This resulted in an unusual high number of crashes.

    • @IvanDmitriev1
      @IvanDmitriev1 11 місяців тому

      @@billsanders5067 "low altitude low speed ground attack weapon" a CFIT weapon, you say? How intriguing.

    • @user-rp5vx2pb9i
      @user-rp5vx2pb9i 3 місяці тому

      @@billsanders5067 You know your stuff! In the Luftwaffe, non-combat missions, 269 crashes and 116 pilots killed. Erich Hartmann, the highest scoring Ace of WW II was also Chief of the Luftwaffe at the time. He was totally against the aircraft and there were allegations of some kind of bribes known as the "Lockeed Scandal."
      He was retired early in 1970.

  • @spavliskojr
    @spavliskojr Рік тому +2

    For what its worth that is some of the best special effects for its time.

    • @Strahan740i
      @Strahan740i Рік тому +1

      It's not of its time; this is from 2006 ;) They updated footage to take advantage of modern (at the time) techniques.

  • @alessandrobartoloni2871
    @alessandrobartoloni2871 11 місяців тому +2

    Mitico cacciatore di stelle con il suo j 79!

  • @knightstemplar6243
    @knightstemplar6243 Рік тому +2

    I never got to see that episode when I was very young I’d love to watch this in full

  • @Sherwoody
    @Sherwoody 3 роки тому +10

    Kirk could have beamed the pilot to the ground and drag the Stafighter to low earth orbit and let it burn up on re-entry. But, then the episode would have only lasted 10 minutes.

    • @rcmorales9014
      @rcmorales9014 3 роки тому

      Maybe when the Enterprise was flung back in time, might've knocked the transporters off line.

    • @Fazzel
      @Fazzel Рік тому +1

      @@rcmorales9014 - So how did they beam the pilot onboard?

    • @rcmorales9014
      @rcmorales9014 Рік тому +1

      @@Fazzel Scotty is a miracle worker.

    • @armyboy0579
      @armyboy0579 Рік тому +1

      Then you wouldn't have much of an episode

  • @andyhughes1776
    @andyhughes1776 3 роки тому +6

    This actually happened in 2004 off the coast of California when 2 F-18 fighter jets chased after a "Flying Tic-Tac".
    Truth is stranger than fiction.

    • @sharko121
      @sharko121 3 роки тому

      That's because a Cabal runs the world. Hollywood is apart of it and anything they show you in movies and TV shows, they can already do. Unfortunately it's been hidden in secret black budget programs. Ben Rich from Lockheed Martin said back in 1993. "We have the technology to take ET home."

    • @andyhughes1776
      @andyhughes1776 3 роки тому

      @@sharko121 Agree with the global cabal and Hollywood as their instrument of mind control.
      Disagree that humans could build anything remotely similar to Flying Tic-Tacs.

    • @Bartonovich52
      @Bartonovich52 3 роки тому +2

      Lol.... the government couldn’t even keep Watergate under wraps or affect a regime change in a third world nation without it becoming a decades long quagmire and you think there is a global cabal?
      I have ocean front property in Arizona you might be interested in.

    • @sharko121
      @sharko121 3 роки тому

      @@Bartonovich52 time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/
      Yes I do, and this Scandal is going to make Watergate look like ginger beer.

    • @andyhughes1776
      @andyhughes1776 3 роки тому +1

      @@Bartonovich52 They managed to keep the SR-71 spy plane secret for 30 years.
      And most people today STILL does not know the real reason why the U.S. got involved in Vietnam.
      How many decades has it been?

  • @dustbat
    @dustbat Рік тому +2

    Man, that was great!🦇

  • @Tina-di4lx
    @Tina-di4lx 3 роки тому +7

    The man in a missile.
    104 was an amazing aircraft.

    • @dlc1119
      @dlc1119 Рік тому +1

      Actually very fast but not very stable.

  • @danielh3179
    @danielh3179 3 роки тому +5

    From the shot of the Enterprise below clouds at 2:46, one could assume that the altitude was below 15,000 to 20,000 feet. It would be interesting to hear them explain how the Enterprise was able to achieve the necessary aerodynamics for flying in Earth's atmosphere.

    • @Trompicavalas
      @Trompicavalas 3 роки тому +5

      If you can bend the space-time to travel several times faster than light, at warp speed, and you can create artificial gravity on your decks, i think you can offset the Earth gravity
      It's all about doing "little alterations" in the Riemann's Tensor

    • @danielh3179
      @danielh3179 3 роки тому +2

      @@Trompicavalas The issue isn't manipulating Einstein's general theory. The issue is dealing with mundane forces like wind resistance, lift, and drag for a huge craft that's not obviously aerodynamically designed, particularly at supersonic speeds.

    • @Trompicavalas
      @Trompicavalas 3 роки тому +2

      @@danielh3179 Mundane aerodynamic forces are for vessels that cannot manipulate the curvature of spacetime at will. But if you prefer, They can also create an energy shield around her that has an optimal aerodynamic shape.
      I leave both options for you so you can choose the one you like the most

    • @kougerat5388
      @kougerat5388 3 роки тому +3

      Easy to explain really "Science Fiction"

    • @nordan00
      @nordan00 3 роки тому

      It’s got warp engines, jackass!

  • @FloatingOnAZephyr
    @FloatingOnAZephyr Рік тому +2

    It was called the Starfighter, which is maybe why the writers chose it? I prefer the original special effects, but that's another matter.

  • @ozziemederos
    @ozziemederos 4 роки тому +11

    This also you see the enterprise in the sky for the first time

  • @theusher2893
    @theusher2893 Рік тому +1

    Amazing! You almost can't see the strings 😆

  • @mikeking7381
    @mikeking7381 Рік тому +2

    Sweet F-104 vs Enterprise

  • @rogerlynch5279
    @rogerlynch5279 6 місяців тому

    To me still one of the best STAR TREK episodes ever done.

  • @dancastro6873
    @dancastro6873 3 роки тому +1

    Fact: Actor who plays the F104 pilot was on Laugh In

  • @brunozeigerts6379
    @brunozeigerts6379 6 місяців тому

    Spock should have said, 'It is an F104, colloquially identified as the Starfighter.'

  • @Rick-or2kq
    @Rick-or2kq 3 роки тому +6

    The F-104 known as the widow maker.

  • @Mr.SharkTooth-zc8rm
    @Mr.SharkTooth-zc8rm 4 місяці тому

    GREAT special effects for the time. Still holds up.

  • @freddymarcel-marcum6831
    @freddymarcel-marcum6831 4 роки тому +2

    1:06 lol that's like my dad on the riding lawnmower after a few drinks on a hot day, you might get a mowed lawn or a couple of crop circles in the yard😆👍🇩🇰💞🇺🇸

    • @johnnygnoneeded
      @johnnygnoneeded 3 роки тому

      AHAHAHAHA!! That was epic!! Or my Mom would yell because her flowers were "trimmed!"

  • @olddisneylandtickets
    @olddisneylandtickets Рік тому +1

    1:47 Wow, love that part.

  • @lidell56
    @lidell56 3 роки тому +4

    I prefer the original version of this clip. It looked more realistic.

  • @Turboy65
    @Turboy65 5 місяців тому +1

    I've never yet thought that the CGI "enhanced" TOS versions were better, or even as good, as TOS with its original effects and visuals. It just doesn't fit right.

  • @TheRantingCabbie
    @TheRantingCabbie 5 років тому +2

    The only time I'd be worried about getting beamed up is when taking a big dump.

  • @stevefowler2112
    @stevefowler2112 4 місяці тому

    a small tidbit about the 104 that isn't widely known...one reason Lockheed was able to get the U2 designed and manufactured and flying so quickly is they basically just took a 104, lengthened the fuselage, repowered it and slapped some really long thin wings on it and whalla, you had a U2.

  • @guyfawkesuThe1
    @guyfawkesuThe1 11 місяців тому +1

    The F-104 was a high altitude interceptor that could touch the edge of space....almost.

  • @FLJBeliever1776
    @FLJBeliever1776 3 роки тому +3

    A Starfighter chases a Starship.

  • @ti994apc
    @ti994apc 6 років тому +13

    I wonder if that is why Germany lost so many F-104's ?

    • @tony_5156
      @tony_5156 5 років тому

      Chad Snow because the F-104 is terrible

    • @Cortana_ice_fox
      @Cortana_ice_fox 5 років тому +4

      They tried using it for something completely different than what it was designed to do.

    • @mikecimerian6913
      @mikecimerian6913 5 років тому +2

      @@Cortana_ice_fox I recall it was used as a tactical nuclear bomber. The mission assignment couldn't be more inappropriate.

    • @appleiphone69
      @appleiphone69 5 років тому

      Mike Cimerian no it was high altitude and speed interceptor of soviet bombers

    • @raynus1160
      @raynus1160 4 роки тому +1

      Germany and Canada used theirs for nuclear tactical strike aircraft - low level, 450-plus knots, bad weather.
      Do the math.

  • @CaptApril123
    @CaptApril123 5 місяців тому

    Going mach 2.0 Sulu:"She's sluggish and slow sir"

  • @nordan00
    @nordan00 3 роки тому +6

    The heyday of TAC, when the US was churning out all kinds of jet aircraft!

    • @Dra741
      @Dra741 3 роки тому +1

      And in the fifties and sixties Pilots were encountering these things and in 1952 they actually over flu Washington

    • @Dra741
      @Dra741 3 роки тому +3

      I like it when Spock says yes it's carrying a nuclear missile which could cause some damage to the ship

    • @Dra741
      @Dra741 3 роки тому +6

      Back in the at Edwards Air Force Base and 60s we had aircraft armed with nuclear missiles on them they were called hot Birds, and you needed special permission to launch them

    • @RCAvhstape
      @RCAvhstape 3 роки тому

      @@Dra741 I don't think the F-104 ever carried the Genie nuclear rocket, and I'm sure it never carried the Nuclear Falcon, but certainly many of its contemporaries did, maybe Spock just didn't know for sure what kind of jet it was. If that were an F-106 the USAF may have scored a kill on a Starfleet starship.

  • @JohnKoenig-db8lk
    @JohnKoenig-db8lk 5 місяців тому +1

    Good thing he wasn't flying a P-39. Enterprise wouldn't stand a chance.

  • @jsgold2000
    @jsgold2000 3 роки тому +5

    Spock, looks seriously concerned the jet has missiles, possibly nuclear. Kirk, ahh screw them. Get me Scotty...

    • @Nighthawke70
      @Nighthawke70 3 роки тому +1

      Not even close. The only rocket at the time that was nuclear equipped was the AIR-2 GENIE, a fat tub of nothing but a bomb with wings and a solid motor. The fuse was a simple timer; there was no PAL (Permissive Action Link) safety system for the weapon, it was fire then RUN.
      They played with fitting it to the Starfighter, using a trapeze rig, similar to what the F-102/106 had, but nothing came of it.

    • @jsgold2000
      @jsgold2000 3 роки тому +2

      @@Nighthawke70 Great information. Thanks!

    • @PauloPereira-jj4jv
      @PauloPereira-jj4jv 3 роки тому +1

      @@Nighthawke70 ...even so, the Genie could damage the Enterprise.

    • @RCAvhstape
      @RCAvhstape 3 роки тому

      @@Nighthawke70 Also there was the AIM-26 Nuclear Falcon, which was not carried by the F-104.

  • @expat0149
    @expat0149 3 роки тому +6

    The 104 would definately out climb the Enterprise , think the Enterprise has the 104 in the turn
    though ;)

  • @ghostdog1454
    @ghostdog1454 3 роки тому +2

    Aircraft is to fragile, Kirk as Top Gun : lets transport the dude.

  • @westrim
    @westrim Рік тому

    Oxnard Air Force Base, now Camarillo Airport. I just went to the airshow, no F-104s flew though. It's just off the 101, so I can see why it appealed as a filming location.

  • @brianarbenz1329
    @brianarbenz1329 9 місяців тому

    Notice the jet makes the whooshing sound atmospheric resistance would cause. But the Enterprise makes no such sound. Yet in the opening theme the Enterprise famously "whooshes" even though it's not in any atmosphere. That may have been an NBC idea to give the opening theme more popular culture pizazz.

  • @jocknarn3225
    @jocknarn3225 3 роки тому +2

    Captain Sir; something’s klingin’ onto the outer hull. Don’t daft yeoman, that’d b a foolish ... enterprise🍳

  • @jimwatson842
    @jimwatson842 3 роки тому +1

    The Zipper (Widow Maker, Phallus Tube), had no chance against Big E.

  • @sid2112
    @sid2112 3 роки тому +3

    Sulu, can't you keep this ship steady? Come on, man!

    • @craiga2002
      @craiga2002 3 роки тому

      Oh Captain, stop being a Hideous Little B!tch!!

  • @guyfawkesuThe1
    @guyfawkesuThe1 11 місяців тому +1

    This would have been Offutt AFB, Nebraska, the former home of SAC (Strategic Air Command - nukes). At the time, very authentic.

  • @marcus102361
    @marcus102361 6 місяців тому

    This and Gary 7 were my two favorites....

  • @kAe8560
    @kAe8560 5 місяців тому

    The Enterprise having trouble with crosswinds or what!

  • @Robert-ff9wf
    @Robert-ff9wf Рік тому

    Me too! I loved both those episodes two!

  • @OldGeezer55
    @OldGeezer55 3 роки тому +12

    The funny thing is they actually were an F-106 base. No F-104s during that period.

    • @jimmytgoose476
      @jimmytgoose476 2 роки тому +3

      During what period ? The period when a 23rd century star ship appeared out of nowhere ? Or a different one ?

    • @armyboy0579
      @armyboy0579 Рік тому +1

      I'm going to take a guess at the f-106 was still hypothetically classified material so they wouldn't show it on a TV show and said they would show an older aircraft that probably already been exported to NATO allies.

    • @OldGeezer55
      @OldGeezer55 11 місяців тому

      Or, they didn't have stock footage of the 106s OR they just thought the 104 was far cooler or the prop guy had an F-104 ready to shoot. Still like the 104 in the shot. @@armyboy0579

  • @spikedpsycho2383
    @spikedpsycho2383 3 роки тому +10

    F104 wasn't a great fighter
    Still with a top speed over Mach 2, does that mean a Enterprise can do supersonic in atmosphere? If so a 300 meter vessel would create a supersonic wake so bad it'll shatter the hearing of those down below

    • @General_Flores
      @General_Flores 3 роки тому

      Perhaps because it... wasn't a fighter? It was an interceptor.

    • @stinkyfungus
      @stinkyfungus 3 роки тому +1

      @@General_Flores
      No, it was a fighter.
      Kelly Johnson developed it to be a light weight, inexpensive dayfighter
      It is the late 50s version of the early F16.
      Long on performance, short on features, cheap, and easy to obtain in large numbers.
      Johnson sat a bunch of top scoring korean war F86 pilots and asked them "what do you need to beat the new mig types that will follow on the Mig 15" (what a novel concept... ask the guys that will actually USE the damned thing what they want!)
      Superior Speed, acceleration, and climb rate was the resounding answer.
      Thus the 104 was born - the energy fighter to rule all energy fighters.
      Yes, it could turn, provided it kept its speed up - it could turn better than the migs at higher air speeds,
      And nothing in the air at the time could keep up with it in a climb.
      It could maintain supersonic speed in a climb, and was the first production fighter in the world to fly mach 2 in level flight.
      Those attributes made it a pretty good short range interceptor - but its armament wasn't really suited for it.
      A couple sidewinders and an M61 cannon were originally its optimum load out. That's not a bomber killing setup... that's a 1950s air dominance setup.
      Attempts to make it into a multirole fighter is wat earned it its bad reputation for a pilot killer. The simple lightweight american "C" model, while tricky on takeoff and landing was not as unforgiving as the heavier german "G" models. Or the CA-104s that Canada outfitted for nuclear strike.

    • @dogsbd
      @dogsbd 2 роки тому

      Actually the F-104 was a great fighter and a fine fighter bomber. Outside of the German Luftwaffe it's safety record was on par with other such aircraft of its time. The Germans had issues with it because of poor pilot training and low altitude missions flown in poor weather. The J79 engine of the F-104 was also new at the time and created most of the issues the aircraft had early on.

    • @jimmytgoose476
      @jimmytgoose476 2 роки тому

      A great fighter ? Really ?

  • @LuisSanchezLouieLouie
    @LuisSanchezLouieLouie 3 роки тому +2

    The effects were good for that time

    • @stevemortl
      @stevemortl 3 роки тому

      This is the remastered version with updated vfx,

    • @MuzixMaker
      @MuzixMaker 2 роки тому

      @@stevemortl original is better

  • @ohioken1
    @ohioken1 3 роки тому +13

    I always wondered how the Enterprise was able to enter the atmosphere without burning up! We see it burning up when it hit the atmosphere in ‘The search for Spock’. Also in the TOS episode ‘Naked Time’ the Enterprise was dangerously close to burning up as it’s engines were off and she was falling from orbit?

    • @sid2112
      @sid2112 3 роки тому +2

      Skimming, bro.

    • @throwback19841
      @throwback19841 3 роки тому +7

      Assuming impulse engines are magical, Enterprise would just cancel most of its orbital velocity and gently descend into the atmosphere, again using impulse engines to prevent excessive build up of speed due to gravity. Therefore it would not have sufficient kinetic energy to generate dangerous re-entry heating.

    • @ohioken1
      @ohioken1 3 роки тому +5

      @@throwback19841 why didn’t I think of that. May faith in the Star Trek universe has been restored!

    • @zafranorbian757
      @zafranorbian757 3 роки тому +2

      @@throwback19841 That would be the job of the reaction controle thrusters not the impulse engines.

    • @Mike1064ab
      @Mike1064ab Рік тому +3

      Search for Spock the ship had destructed it had no directional control. In naked time it has no impulse power same problem. Under power the enterprise can enter the atmosphere safely.

  • @cxj810
    @cxj810 Рік тому +13

    Some of the killjoys forget that the Big E would have a magnetic field around it in the form of the Deflector Field. As for the Starfighter; that was one of the best Century Series fighters ever built, but it needed an Fighter Pilot to handle it. In this period in history, the TAC (Tactical Air Command) would have been using F-102 or -106 Flying Coffins as interceptors, however, as most of the 104's were on other missions or for Export. Most of the front-line Phantoms were in Indochina or on Carrier Duty, if memory serves, during the mid-Sixties. A Phantom could withstand the Big E's deflector shields without breaking a sweat, I'm here to tell you.

  • @williamwyckoff3963
    @williamwyckoff3963 2 роки тому +1

    Followed a really bright light going up the Colombia river followed it 5 miles then it just disappeared not a trace anywhere

  • @grantconway7102
    @grantconway7102 5 місяців тому

    Great graphics love this episode

  • @bluedragontoybash2463
    @bluedragontoybash2463 Рік тому

    I expect study on F-104 vs CVN-6 but this is a nice suprise

  • @johnspartan98
    @johnspartan98 3 роки тому +2

    Good thing they erased his memory otherwise those ancient astronaut theorists would never have gotten on Sci FI Channel.

    • @B-and-O-Operator-Fairmont
      @B-and-O-Operator-Fairmont 5 місяців тому

      They didn't so much erase his memory as deposit him back in his plane before anything happened.

  • @lpg12338
    @lpg12338 11 місяців тому

    Great, now I have to watch the whole episode. 🤣👍

  • @edw223
    @edw223 Рік тому +1

    I was in NATO when F-104s were deployed in Germany. The joke was, "How do you get and F-104? Just buy an acre of land and wait."

    • @billsanders5067
      @billsanders5067 Рік тому

      The West German Air Force attempted to employ the F104 as a low level, slow speed ground attack aircraft, something it was designed for, hence an unusual number of crashes.

    • @armyboy0579
      @armyboy0579 Рік тому

      Didn't they literally put them on top of giant rocket boosters to get them airborne without a runway?

    • @billsanders5067
      @billsanders5067 Рік тому

      @@armyboy0579Are you

    • @billsanders5067
      @billsanders5067 Рік тому +1

      @armyboy0579 No. You maybe referring to jet assisted take off systems (aka JETO). These were rocketes attacked to each side of the aircra

    • @armyboy0579
      @armyboy0579 Рік тому

      @@billsanders5067 ua-cam.com/video/75qnxMd1YSY/v-deo.htmlsi=Bhyq5QGy4Imlzuio

  • @richarddarlington1139
    @richarddarlington1139 2 роки тому +2

    Lockheed F-104, the original Starfighter!

  • @RaulFagnani-rj1qt
    @RaulFagnani-rj1qt Рік тому

    Un mundo muy Primitivo. Con esa tegnologias.

  • @user-qb1nz8wr2e
    @user-qb1nz8wr2e 6 місяців тому

    One of my favorite episodes

  • @randymillhouse791
    @randymillhouse791 6 місяців тому

    Much like the company I work for, make it up as you go along.

  • @RickyJr46
    @RickyJr46 3 роки тому +4

    Skunk Works versus Star Fleet.

    • @felixbilk4684
      @felixbilk4684 3 роки тому

      Tasic blue vs.oxcar.maybee take care...Gruß..

  • @mr6johnclark
    @mr6johnclark Рік тому +2

    F-104 Starfighter sometimes known as the Widowmaker or the Lawndart.
    A crashing one isnt out of the ordinary.

  • @davidcawrowl3865
    @davidcawrowl3865 Рік тому

    Man, were those episodes fun!

  • @clays1507
    @clays1507 Рік тому +2

    I Dream of Jeannie meets Star Trek

  • @Sjelton
    @Sjelton 2 роки тому

    I remember this episode fondly.

  • @mumblesbadly7708
    @mumblesbadly7708 Рік тому +1

    Obviously, that fighter pilot was NOT a Star Trek fan, else he would have immediately recognized the Enterprise!

    • @Fazzel
      @Fazzel Рік тому +1

      Maybe this took place in 1965. (Star Trek first aired in 1966) So he wouldn't know anything about Star Trek yet.

  • @migmadmarine
    @migmadmarine Рік тому

    The Zipper!! All the hot jet jockeys of that period wanted duty flying one

  • @guyfawkesuThe1
    @guyfawkesuThe1 11 місяців тому +1

    They don't have Klaxon horns on Air Force bases.

  • @nicktykhnenko8601
    @nicktykhnenko8601 Рік тому +1

    In real life F104 called flying coffin

  • @user-vk1wt8fm8b
    @user-vk1wt8fm8b Місяць тому

    Одного отправили на такой здаровый не известный объект

  • @yaneznayu9997
    @yaneznayu9997 4 роки тому +1

    Sure, cut the tractor beam, just let the wreckage fall onto...whatever, whomever.
    "Ooops, sorry, sorry..."