AJAHN CHAH AND THE ORIGINAL MIND --- by Nyanamoli Thero

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 вер 2024
  • From Ajahn Chah's talk "Path of Peace". What did Ajahn Chah mean by "original mind" and "the way things are"? How to discern the mind as the foundation of one's experience of happiness and suffering alike.
    -----------------------------------------------------------
    If you wish to gift your support to life at the Hillside you would be very welcome to do so by donating at:
    www.hillsideher...
    For other forms of Dhamma Teachings see:
    www.hillsideher...
    For the Buddhist Phenomenology essays see:
    www.hillsideher...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 24

  • @shelinahetherington4661
    @shelinahetherington4661 10 місяців тому +4

    Brilliant teaching and explanation, thank you so much Ajahn 🙏🏽

  • @wijithagorakanage4560
    @wijithagorakanage4560 3 місяці тому +1

    🙏🙏🙏

  • @loganbrown9845
    @loganbrown9845 5 років тому +18

    "The mind and the body are there without you; they don't need your sense of self."
    Really great, love the intensity. Thank you.

  • @johnt.inscrutable1545
    @johnt.inscrutable1545 5 років тому +12

    I find these talks make it easier to digest the teachings of Ajahn Chah and others. Venerable explains these in a somewhat different way which seems to me to make clear some of my experiences that seemed contradictory.
    Thank you
    Sadhu! Sadhu! Sadhu!

    • @NoobTube4148
      @NoobTube4148 4 роки тому +2

      John T. Inscrutable yes, this is one of the most unique ways of teaching the Dhamma that I’ve ever seen. It’s also like I’ve had hit a wall in my understanding for quite some time now and a lot of those things were resolved (wrong views) by some of the discussions between the monks here. Can’t wait to go visit hillside hermitage when I’m next in Sri Lanka.

    • @srimathisamarakone8535
      @srimathisamarakone8535 3 роки тому

      @@NoobTube4148 You have put into words what I feel after listening to Ven Ajan Nanamoli. Thank you

    • @srimathisamarakone8535
      @srimathisamarakone8535 3 роки тому

      By the way I am from Sri Lanka.

  • @tod4810
    @tod4810 3 роки тому +4

    Finally. The factors that know only oneself.

  • @wichienmath
    @wichienmath 5 років тому +5

    Sathu...from Thailand with high respects.

  • @sathisharthar
    @sathisharthar 18 днів тому

    Another good explanation from Ven.. Wish in future upload an explanation on the semiotic of desire by Ven sariputta from Mahavedalla sutta.

  • @pannavaddhi6573
    @pannavaddhi6573 4 роки тому +6

    10:18
    MN 1 Mūlapariyāya Sutta (The Root of all Things )

  • @อนิจจาอนัตตา

    Sadhu🙏🙏🙏

  • @ToKiniAndy
    @ToKiniAndy 4 роки тому +8

    So, when one's attention is focused on a smell (for example) all smells beyond that smell, all sights, sounds, tastes, touches, and thoughts are now peripheral?
    But then attention is drawn to a sight and now smells, sounds, tastes, touches, thoughts, and OTHER sights are now peripheral. That single aimed attention and those peripherals are experience as a whole? Is this a correct interpretation of how you are describing rupa and arupa (in the way Ajahn Chah uses it)?
    If so, this means that one needs to learn to become aware at all times of those peripherals being there while one is aiming at something specific? It seems that, if this is the case, failing to take into account the peripheral, the sense of self hides there and one assumes it to "exist". If one takes into account peripheral AND where they are specifically aiming, they come to see that all of experience is accounted for, and none of it is contains "the self". Intellectually speaking, this is what I'm hearing. Practically speaking, if one makes an effort to keep these peripherals and the aim in mind at all times (this is mindfulness?) for long enough they let go of their view of self?
    Obviously, this is all on an intellectual level (or I wouldn't have to ask), but if there are holes in the above articulation of what I'm hearing, please let me know (as I'm sure I've missed something).
    Thank you!

    • @HillsideHermitage
      @HillsideHermitage  4 роки тому +15

      Yes.
      No, there are no 'peripherals', only one peripheral that all the plurality has merged into. So you cannot become aware of multiple things in the periphery without making them an actual singled out object of your attention. All you need to MAINTAIN in KNOWLEDGE is that with peripheral, there is actual, with actual there is peripheral.
      (This will have to be done on the basis of sense restraint and virtue.)

    • @NoobTube4148
      @NoobTube4148 4 роки тому +3

      ToKini Andy thanks for asking this question! I learned a lot from it.

  • @ronlepree7135
    @ronlepree7135 Рік тому +1

    Exposed...thank you
    Like when a raindrop hits the open sea
    🙏💮🙏

  • @aboriginalpeopleofindia5299
    @aboriginalpeopleofindia5299 3 роки тому +1

    👍🎉🇮🙏🎉 साधु, साधु, साधु🇳

  • @ThaniyoBhikkhu
    @ThaniyoBhikkhu 2 роки тому +1

    The transcription: pathpress.org/ajahn-chah-and-the-original-mind/

  • @bkhpanigha
    @bkhpanigha 5 років тому +2

    Here's a transcript of this talk for anyone who might benefit from it.
    Link: docs.google.com/document/d/1bpLBiVhDCG1w-VKIyI-Ldy8LXJkSdcxGmK7KZvWi5Bk/edit?usp=sharing

    • @bkhpanigha
      @bkhpanigha 5 років тому +1

      Note: Link is no longer working. The transcript is now available at: pathpress.wordpress.com/2019/08/25/ajahn-chah-and-the-original-mind/

    • @srimathisamarakone8535
      @srimathisamarakone8535 3 роки тому +1

      @@bkhpanigha Much merit for giving this info.

  • @Dhammaeveryday
    @Dhammaeveryday Рік тому +1

    Kāya samvara sādhu?

  • @minaos5762
    @minaos5762 Рік тому

    At 8:57 there is a word I am not understanding, nor have I heard it before, is it 'atavada' the first contradiction to go ?

  • @ratte7689
    @ratte7689 2 роки тому +1

    8:00