Very nice. I always teach PFMEA using the standard assumption "assume all incoming material is good." However, your presentation and my experience with quality issues clear illustrates why this is wrong.
thanks for sharing your experience on fmea commun mistakes. Would be very helpful if you ve provided examples of the correct entries to highlight these mistakes ( exp: detection mistake: operator error / correct entry would be: ? )...thanks again
very clear explanation. Thank You. I have questions from my staff on Severity point . we found a lot of samples from others industry especially from internet or automotive that severity point is not change even action plan already taken. My understanding severity point should be change base on new action point of view. Any idea?
In regards to mistake #6, what ranking guide are you referring to? As per the AIAG FMEA Manual 4th edition, a ranking of 3 is "Appearance or audible noise, vehicle operable, does not conform and noticed by many customers (50%)."
Very nice. I always teach PFMEA using the standard assumption "assume all incoming material is good." However, your presentation and my experience with quality issues clear illustrates why this is wrong.
thanks for sharing your experience on fmea commun mistakes. Would be very helpful if you ve provided examples of the correct entries to highlight these mistakes ( exp: detection mistake: operator error / correct entry would be: ? )...thanks again
Thanks for the useful insight. What would add even more value is if you provided excellent examples of what would constitute better alternatives.
very clear explanation. Thank You. I have questions from my staff on Severity point . we found a lot of samples from others industry especially from internet or automotive that severity point is not change even action plan already taken. My understanding severity point should be change base on new action point of view. Any idea?
Great presentation. Would it be possible to get a copy of this slide presentation? Thanks in advance. Michael
In regards to mistake #6, what ranking guide are you referring to? As per the AIAG FMEA Manual 4th edition, a ranking of 3 is "Appearance or audible noise, vehicle operable, does not conform and noticed by many customers (50%)."
3 would be a non-returnable noise or appearance issue
very informative and good to generate good guidelines for implementation
content is too good
Dude your sound scared my child it was loud. Next time fix your damn sound the shit is to loud compared to other channels