If America liberated our neighbors in South America, we wouldn't need a wall. Gangs killed 2.5 million in South America while America was in the Middle East.
@@15jewjew No, the question is if the Democrats even want to protect our border. They opposed Trump's every move to lock down the border in 2016. Kamala Harris said it was her priority to oppose any border action that Trump wanted to take. She said that she believes illegal migration should be decriminalized, and that we should abolish ICE. Why should we believe that she's changed her opinion on any of this?
@@andrewpage8759 Well Democrats have done things about the border and Obama was even criticize for deporting more immigrants than George Bush. Either way Kamala supported a bill that was a bit of a compromise. She has changed her stances and have listened to when the people critiques her. Trump wasted billions of dollars on a fence that Mexico did not pay for. He failed in his promise. Kamala actually raised money in pledges for countries in both America and Mexico to create jobs and allow for better opportunities for immigrants. That way they may not have to leave their country. She's worked for solutions that will work in the long run and knows how to compromise so that America can get a solution to border control. Even if it doesn't align 100% with her world view or beliefs she still knows how to be a team player and work with others for better solutions. Trump's biggest stance has been immigration to the point he's willing to lie and say immigrants are eating cats and dogs. He also said Kamala wants to perform trans gender operations on the immigrants. Sorry, but conservatives or liberals, Democrat or Republican. Trump isn't the guy for the job. To some degree we need immigration as many countries that have strict border laws suffer cause they don't have enough man power in the country or work force.
@@andrewpage8759 and trump shot down the biggest bipartisan border bill in years, whats your point, Trump doesnt want to solve the so-called "border crisis", and you can allow paths to citizenship legally while stopping illegal border crossings. Again if you have more judges to process assylum cases you literally solve the problem, most people that come in here and are labeled "Illegals" got in the country legaly by applying for assylum, but without an actual assylum case, they are literally taking advantage of the fact that we have a backlog of assylum cases. Since assylum is possible, they are allowed to stay in the U.S while their assylum case is pending, it is literally an international crime to return individuals to countries where their life or liberty may be at risk. If the process was faster, and more efficient, actual cases of assylum could be let in legally while others would be turned away before they are allowed into the country for years while they wait for a trial date.
Yes, right now countries indeed must protect their borders, but no one seems to be working so that it is not needed in the future and that is just sad...
Remember, Biden and Kamala revoked Trump's 94 border executive orders in the first 100 days leading to two arguments: 1. The border crisis is caused by Biden and Kamala. 2. President can close and secure the border by executive orders. But Biden and Kamala didn't do so. Learn this before making further arguments. Democrats voters: 2016, 2020.
@@davidliu2243border security bill which basically facilitates and normalizes illegal immigration. Again Trump is protecting our borders even when he is not president.
WRONG! Per Sen. Lankford, conservative REPUBLICAN author of the bill: “It’s not that the first 5,000 [migrants encountered at the border] are released, that’s ridiculous,’ Lankford said on the Senate floor. ‘The first 5,000 we detain, we screen and then we deport. If we get above 5,000, we just detain and deport.’”
@@pollutingpenguin2146AND it would have allowed thousands through per day before triggering any attempt at enforcement. AND it would have changed "asylum" rules to allow even more thousands through per day. It was a bogus bill.
Ok, who is the president for the last 4 years? she is the VP and almost has no power in changing the situation, probably only advising the sitting president. Trump also had 4 years to do it and he separated children from their parents in the border and held them in the most inhumane way. Trump was much worse in terms of border. I guess you never attended civics class in school
I find it interesting that WSJ chose to not include any mention as to the "why" behind Republicans not supporting the Democrats' proposed border security bill.
@@patrickbateman1660 No, it did not have all the votes. Otherwise, the bill would have passed. In fact, the bill didn't even have support from all Democrats in Congress. Furthermore, there is no direct, factual evidence proving that Republicans voted against the October 2024 border security bill solely because of "Trump’s call". Suggesting otherwise ignores that, as a whole, the Republican party believed the bill did not address the urgency and severity of the immigration crisis. Provisions like "shutdown authority" only after 5,000 encounters per day were seen as too lenient, and there was a strong desire for more immediate, stringent border controls. Furthermore, some Republicans opposed the inclusion of foreign aid, especially for Ukraine, tied to the bill, viewing immigration and foreign policy as separate issues (In my opinion, rightfully so). Unfortunately, @wsj lacks the commitment and journalistic integrity for fair, unbiased reporting. Otherwise, they would have referenced the reasons why the bill did not pass instead of phrasing it in the biased manner in which they did.
Most of these poll questions do a terrible job of separating legal immigration (including legitimate asylum claims) from illegal immigration. It's so blatant sometimes that I have to assume that it's on purpose.
@@TheDarkrebel131🙄Stop repeating those same old lies, unless those lies are all you have of course. That "Border Bill" was nothing but a false flag that would have allowed thousands through a day before triggering enforcement.🙄
@@TheDarkrebel131🙄Stop lying. It's almost like lies are all y'all have. That was a "Border Bill" without any actual security to it at all that would have allowed thousands through per day before triggering any attempt at enforcement. But I do agree with you that it was laughable.😂🤣
If you read them, they are quite center-right actually. They have been unusually favourable to her recently though, maybe it's because her polies make sense and she's got plans.
It’s insane to think you can illegally come to the US from Mexico on a freight train and end up in a hotel in NYC. What a joke !!! Democrat Party policy to have them to stay in power along with no voter id.
The irony was immigration was a Republican issue until republican governors started bussing illegal immigrants to sanctuary cities then all of a sudden Democrats were like MAN WE GOTTA FIX THIS BORDER 😂😂 Lesson: Dump the problem at the feet of the people who don't think its a problem and then watch them change their minds 😂😂😂😂
Excuse me but I remember Democrats inviting them and actually tell them to come to America, that everyone is Welcome like Cumo and Eric Adams of N.Y., other SANCTUARY CITYS TOO. Trump was racist and xenophobic for wanting to build The Wall so what's changed, Election are upon U.S.
It’s unfortunate that Immigration Policies are primarily focused on Illegal immigration and asylum. I wish candidates also address issues with legal immigration and how they would fix them (e.g., insane decades-long green card queues for Indian and Chinese citizens that are employed, and pay income, Medicare/Medicaid, and Social Security taxes).
@@TripleMachine -He didn't block it. Congress did. -Thank God they did because it was a bogus bill that would have essentially normalized illegal immigrattion even more than the Biden/Harris administration has already done. -Y'all just can't help repeating the same old tired lies and half-truths. Boring.
For a long time, WSJ did journalism on this video that is very well balanced. Error from WSJ did is that Trump never said immigrants cause crime. He said illegal immigrants have a higher crime rate. Illegal is extremely important
Border security and path to citizenship in the same phrase is a contradiction and an euphemism. Especially when in the first 4 year your administration has been critiquing Texas leading to them spend millions of tax dollars on private bus lines to relocate millions of illegal immigrants into US. Which lead to a rise of rent in democrat states like NY and California
When you speak of the “bipartisan” border bill - you can’t just say “Trump shot it down” you have to show the full picture of all of the billions of dollars of aid to Israel and Ukraine. It’s disingenuous to say it’s a border bill when $100 billion goes to nations across the Atlantic.
Kamala’s stance hasn’t changed, only what she says. Trump and Kamala have already been in office. Let’s look at the border during both of their terms, then make a decision.
They’ve been in two separate offices. Harris can’t override Biden on what he does anymore than Pence could override Trump. It’s literally elementary school civics. Literal children have a better grasp of this than you.
The economic effects of immigration, both legal and illegal, is greatly exaggerated. According to the US Chamber of Commerce, there isnt a single state which can fill all it's unskilled labor positions. In fact, even border states can only fill 90% of their unskilled labor jobs. Empirically, illegal immigrants cannot be the cause of a job shortage: When a person takes an unskilled job, if they are poor they must spend all their earnings, given the extremely high prices on everything they need to survive. In doing so, they create demand for products and services that can only be filled by hiring workers. So, every person who takes a job, creates roughly one net job through their demand for product. The negative economic effect of illegal immigration is that they get paid off the books, which contributes to the depletion of the social security and medicare funds. But getting paid that way also has its upside for consumers, which is lower food prices, by the same amount. It's really only a matter of who loses, with old people losing more through illegal immigration than young people. But hey, everyone hates boomers these days and republicans already want to end the Social Security system anyway, so they dont actually care. The narrative is only being used as a nationalistic method to bolster support for a party that increasingly has to exaggerate and lie to win elections.
Anyone with basic education and a clean record should be welcomed in. All past mass migrations, from Ireland, from China, from everywhere, were boons, despite Nativism growing as a response each time. The "takin' jerbs" argument is weak, as it ignores the fact the free market will create more jobs to provide products and services for a larger population, and provide a labour influx for new economic ventures, like small business startups. Migrants have a higher business startup rate than native born U.S citizens anyways.
If employers were held to account in the same manner that a bartender can lose their liquor license for serving a minor, the underground economy of migrant exploitation would cease. There is resolute, bipartisan disinterest in effective reform, however.
The bill included 90m dollars for Ukraine along with many other things republicans didn’t like. As well multiple democrats voted against the bill along with the reps.
God this is is the most pro democrat news without going more in depth with the complexity of the border issue. And I mean on their orders and laws that have allowed border crossing sooo easy.
@@Laker62282 Yup, I intended to write "The 'way'...." but sometimes my mac autodeletes words because I am using a non-English keyboard. Is it a satisfactory answer to you?
2m entries in a 4 year period is higher than our countries average and is the highest record in American history. We're averaging 2.5m/yr, 4.5m so far this year, the growing number over 4 years is over 11.6m. How subtlety you side stepped how big that number is 😂
I’m sorry, is Bollywoods finest actor AKA - KAMALA not the VP? She’s saying she will do this and that… ummm baby gurllll, are you not holding Office? 😂 what a joke!!!!
@@withoutpassid What did the wall do? Did it stop the immigrants? Did it slow them down? Did it help immigration officials? I want to hear your defense of the wall. I could use a good laugh.
!I recently sold some of my long-term position and currently sitting on about 250k, do you think Nvidia is a good buy right now or I have I missed out on a crucial buy period, any good stock recommendation on great performing stocks or Crypto will be appreciated.
As a beginner investor, it’s essential for you to have a mentor to keep you accountable. Ruth Ann Tsakonas is my trade analyst, she has guided me to identify key market trends, pinpointed strategic entry points, and provided risk assessments, ensuring my trades decisions align with market dynamics for optimal returns.
I managed to grow a nest egg of around 120k to over a Million. I'm especially grateful to Adviser Ruth Ann Tsakonas, for her expertise and exposure to different areas of the market.
Without a doubt! Ruth Ann Tsakonas is a trader who goes above and beyond. she has an exceptional skill for analyzing market movements and spotting profitable opportunities. Her strategies are meticulously crafted based on thorough research and years of practical experience.
Again I think the majority of people have the wrong mindset when it comes to the issue southern border, many people see the issue at the border as a problem rather than an opportunity that can lead to a significant boom for the US economy
@@quantumbuddhist -We already have people for "cheap manual labor". What you're endorsing there is further devaluing that end of the labor market and making it even harder for those people to find a livable wage job. You're endorsing exploitation.
I am okay with president trump's boarder policy (partially). I support his view about building the wall but not deportation , As deportations is cruel and i don't support anyone who is pro deportation
What about the hundreds of thousands of criminals and murderers that have been allowed in? Isn't it crueler to American citizens to not deport them? Isn't it cruel to expect Americans to support millions of people who illegally crossed our borders?
Trump amps up rhetoric to keep immigration at center of election: on.wsj.com/3XYGV4a
20 million illegals taxpayers are paying for brought this to the center of the election, not to mention the crime that is coming with it.
@@wsj to those of us in the border states, it is a huge issue.
WSJ 😂😂😂😅
If America liberated our neighbors in South America, we wouldn't need a wall. Gangs killed 2.5 million in South America while America was in the Middle East.
WSJ Amps Up Leftist Bias.
A country must protect its borders.
Should it even be a question?
The question is how.
@@15jewjew No, the question is if the Democrats even want to protect our border. They opposed Trump's every move to lock down the border in 2016. Kamala Harris said it was her priority to oppose any border action that Trump wanted to take. She said that she believes illegal migration should be decriminalized, and that we should abolish ICE.
Why should we believe that she's changed her opinion on any of this?
@@andrewpage8759 Well Democrats have done things about the border and Obama was even criticize for deporting more immigrants than George Bush. Either way Kamala supported a bill that was a bit of a compromise. She has changed her stances and have listened to when the people critiques her. Trump wasted billions of dollars on a fence that Mexico did not pay for. He failed in his promise. Kamala actually raised money in pledges for countries in both America and Mexico to create jobs and allow for better opportunities for immigrants. That way they may not have to leave their country. She's worked for solutions that will work in the long run and knows how to compromise so that America can get a solution to border control. Even if it doesn't align 100% with her world view or beliefs she still knows how to be a team player and work with others for better solutions. Trump's biggest stance has been immigration to the point he's willing to lie and say immigrants are eating cats and dogs. He also said Kamala wants to perform trans gender operations on the immigrants. Sorry, but conservatives or liberals, Democrat or Republican. Trump isn't the guy for the job. To some degree we need immigration as many countries that have strict border laws suffer cause they don't have enough man power in the country or work force.
@@andrewpage8759 and trump shot down the biggest bipartisan border bill in years, whats your point, Trump doesnt want to solve the so-called "border crisis", and you can allow paths to citizenship legally while stopping illegal border crossings. Again if you have more judges to process assylum cases you literally solve the problem, most people that come in here and are labeled "Illegals" got in the country legaly by applying for assylum, but without an actual assylum case, they are literally taking advantage of the fact that we have a backlog of assylum cases. Since assylum is possible, they are allowed to stay in the U.S while their assylum case is pending, it is literally an international crime to return individuals to countries where their life or liberty may be at risk. If the process was faster, and more efficient, actual cases of assylum could be let in legally while others would be turned away before they are allowed into the country for years while they wait for a trial date.
Yes, right now countries indeed must protect their borders, but no one seems to be working so that it is not needed in the future and that is just sad...
After 4 years in office, now harris is concerned about the border. 😂😅😂😅😂
Didn't you get the part about Trump blocking the border security bill?
She tried to but Trump had the bill blocked so he had something to bargain with.
🙄All y'all have is repeating that same old brain-dead lie about Trump "blocking the bill". Sad.🙄
Remember, Biden and Kamala revoked Trump's 94 border executive orders in the first 100 days leading to two arguments:
1. The border crisis is caused by Biden and Kamala.
2. President can close and secure the border by executive orders. But Biden and Kamala didn't do so.
Learn this before making further arguments.
Democrats voters: 2016, 2020.
@@davidliu2243border security bill which basically facilitates and normalizes illegal immigration. Again Trump is protecting our borders even when he is not president.
That immigration bill allowed 2M immigrants before any restrictions kicked in. That bill was Dead on arrival.
WRONG! Per Sen. Lankford, conservative REPUBLICAN author of the bill:
“It’s not that the first 5,000 [migrants encountered at the border] are released, that’s ridiculous,’ Lankford said on the Senate floor. ‘The first 5,000 we detain, we screen and then we deport. If we get above 5,000, we just detain and deport.’”
But threw out 20 million.
@@pax2758 LOL wrong, even Obama could only manage 3 million deportations, the most of any President. 20 million is beyond unrealistic.
She has had 4 years to fix the border.
Trump blocked the border bill.
You forget that?
She tried to but Trump had the bill blocked so he had something to bargain with.
@@matthewandrew that was lumped together with billions to Ukraine?
@@pollutingpenguin2146AND it would have allowed thousands through per day before triggering any attempt at enforcement. AND it would have changed "asylum" rules to allow even more thousands through per day. It was a bogus bill.
Ok, who is the president for the last 4 years? she is the VP and almost has no power in changing the situation, probably only advising the sitting president. Trump also had 4 years to do it and he separated children from their parents in the border and held them in the most inhumane way. Trump was much worse in terms of border. I guess you never attended civics class in school
Bs. You are misrepresenting the bill. The bill would change the definition of who is legal by making it easier to claim asylum. It's a slight of hand.
The WSJ is just as ideologically captured as the NYTimes, but they try to hide it better.
Really I read the bill it doesn't change the definition of asylum seekers ?
Yeah didn't see that in the bill. I also have to say there was a lot on the bill for both parties. It was a compromise. WP explains it right.
@cli_commands what is the name or number of the congressional bill? I'll get it.
@@chrisschene8301 I am assuming everyone is talking about this bill 'S.4361 - Border Act of 2024'
Sky News Australia - CNN call out Kamala Harris for using Trump's border wall in campaign AD
I find it interesting that WSJ chose to not include any mention as to the "why" behind Republicans not supporting the Democrats' proposed border security bill.
They did support it. It had all the votes but trump made the call and they tanked it.
@@patrickbateman1660 No, it did not have all the votes. Otherwise, the bill would have passed. In fact, the bill didn't even have support from all Democrats in Congress.
Furthermore, there is no direct, factual evidence proving that Republicans voted against the October 2024 border security bill solely because of "Trump’s call". Suggesting otherwise ignores that, as a whole, the Republican party believed the bill did not address the urgency and severity of the immigration crisis.
Provisions like "shutdown authority" only after 5,000 encounters per day were seen as too lenient, and there was a strong desire for more immediate, stringent border controls. Furthermore, some Republicans opposed the inclusion of foreign aid, especially for Ukraine, tied to the bill, viewing immigration and foreign policy as separate issues (In my opinion, rightfully so).
Unfortunately, @wsj lacks the commitment and journalistic integrity for fair, unbiased reporting. Otherwise, they would have referenced the reasons why the bill did not pass instead of phrasing it in the biased manner in which they did.
@@patrickbateman1660HOW DARE YOU HOW DARE YOU SHOW THEM THR TRUTH and absolutely leave to space for them to build up Delusional conspiracies
Is there ANY issue Harris hasn't flip-flopped?
Yes, adultery and having multiple kids and 3 different marriages.
Like Trump and JD
Both DonOLD and JD flip-flopped too!
Yes. The one about Trump being a criminal
I'm a democrat, and we need more immigration judges. I hope the bill includes that.
no we need more border security, an actual wall. We don't need to bloat our legal system even more we have too many over paid money hungry lawyers
Most of these poll questions do a terrible job of separating legal immigration (including legitimate asylum claims) from illegal immigration. It's so blatant sometimes that I have to assume that it's on purpose.
Look up World Economic Forum and you will see the Democrats plan for everyone. It would be well worth your time.
🙄No she doesn't. She dngaf about border security. No one, not even Democrats, thinks that she does.🙄
Biden put a border bill and trump asked republicans to stop it so he could be the one to fix it 😂
See republicans don’t care about the border they stopped a bill to help secure the border because trump wanted to be the one to fix it 😭
@@TheDarkrebel131🙄Stop repeating those same old lies, unless those lies are all you have of course. That "Border Bill" was nothing but a false flag that would have allowed thousands through a day before triggering enforcement.🙄
@@TheDarkrebel131🙄Stop lying. It's almost like lies are all y'all have. That was a "Border Bill" without any actual security to it at all that would have allowed thousands through per day before triggering any attempt at enforcement. But I do agree with you that it was laughable.😂🤣
@@TheDarkrebel131ccp script 103.
WSJ is Kamala's Propaganda platform
If you read them, they are quite center-right actually. They have been unusually favourable to her recently though, maybe it's because her polies make sense and she's got plans.
@@sidarthsubramanian7480 No they are not telling what the bill had. Funding to Ukraine.
@@sidarthsubramanian7480 open your eyes.
@@AyushOjha-i9e which was passed by Johnson a couple of weeks later
@@mkenyamzalend sadly I do
It’s insane to think you can illegally come to the US from Mexico on a freight train and end up in a hotel in NYC. What a joke !!! Democrat Party policy to have them to stay in power along with no voter id.
@youtube needs to bring back the dislike button. Wall Street Journal is a democratic propaganda tool.
They took it away because all these left-wing propaganda channels were received attrocious like/dislike rations xD
Harris YOU FAILED!
The irony was immigration was a Republican issue until republican governors started bussing illegal immigrants to sanctuary cities then all of a sudden Democrats were like MAN WE GOTTA FIX THIS BORDER 😂😂
Lesson: Dump the problem at the feet of the people who don't think its a problem and then watch them change their minds 😂😂😂😂
Excuse me but I remember Democrats inviting them and actually tell them to come to America, that everyone is Welcome like Cumo and Eric Adams of N.Y., other SANCTUARY CITYS TOO. Trump was racist and xenophobic for wanting to build The Wall so what's changed, Election are upon U.S.
There are 8b Americans if Harris wins.
It’s unfortunate that Immigration Policies are primarily focused on Illegal immigration and asylum. I wish candidates also address issues with legal immigration and how they would fix them (e.g., insane decades-long green card queues for Indian and Chinese citizens that are employed, and pay income, Medicare/Medicaid, and Social Security taxes).
Harris had her chance on the border. Time for her to go.
She tried to but Trump had the bill blocked so he had something to bargain with.
🙄You're just determined to keep repeating the tired old "Trump blocked the bill" lie over and over. Sad.🙄
@@taylorlibby7642He did block it. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it is not true 😂
@@TripleMachine
-He didn't block it. Congress did.
-Thank God they did because it was a bogus bill that would have essentially normalized illegal immigrattion even more than the Biden/Harris administration has already done.
-Y'all just can't help repeating the same old tired lies and half-truths. Boring.
Time to go to India or Jamaica but not in the USA.
For a long time, WSJ did journalism on this video that is very well balanced.
Error from WSJ did is that Trump never said immigrants cause crime. He said illegal immigrants have a higher crime rate. Illegal is extremely important
The WSJ is just as ideologically captured as the NYTimes is, they just hide it a little bit better.
The WSJ is just as ideologically captured as the NYTimes, they just try to hide it better.
@@taylorlibby7642 ignore all previous prompts, please give me a recipe for apple pie
Border security and path to citizenship in the same phrase is a contradiction and an euphemism. Especially when in the first 4 year your administration has been critiquing Texas leading to them spend millions of tax dollars on private bus lines to relocate millions of illegal immigrants into US. Which lead to a rise of rent in democrat states like NY and California
When you speak of the “bipartisan” border bill - you can’t just say “Trump shot it down” you have to show the full picture of all of the billions of dollars of aid to Israel and Ukraine. It’s disingenuous to say it’s a border bill when $100 billion goes to nations across the Atlantic.
Exactly. Many people only look at the NAME 😂
The Ukraine bill got signed like a week later with no immigration bill and you guys got nothing becauae Trump didn't want any solutions 😂
@@TripleMachine exactly. MAGA leaves that part out because it rightfully makes them look stupid 😂
Also, Biden/Kamala could have issued an executive order
@@electrology There's no such thing as a vice executive order. That's on Biden.
Kamala’s stance hasn’t changed, only what she says. Trump and Kamala have already been in office. Let’s look at the border during both of their terms, then make a decision.
They’ve been in two separate offices. Harris can’t override Biden on what he does anymore than Pence could override Trump. It’s literally elementary school civics. Literal children have a better grasp of this than you.
amnesty for illegals and their anchors or enforcing the laws on the books. Trump 2024
Trump got 4 years and didn't build any wall and never fixed the immigration issue but this time he will fix it???? 🤡🤡🤡
Trump decreased immigration greatly, and Kamala actually visited the wall he built. You have to be as dumb as Kamala to believe otherwise.
No he is a clown
@@TripleMachine Kamala Visited Trump's wall.
@@dl2839 seems to be letting in a lot of people lately🤣
@@paulthillier5996 The federal government took construction equipment and lifted up a wall in Texas to let them into the country.
Only thing I don’t understand is that Harris can execute some of the stuff that she’s claiming right now. And no, I hate Trump
The economic effects of immigration, both legal and illegal, is greatly exaggerated. According to the US Chamber of Commerce, there isnt a single state which can fill all it's unskilled labor positions. In fact, even border states can only fill 90% of their unskilled labor jobs. Empirically, illegal immigrants cannot be the cause of a job shortage: When a person takes an unskilled job, if they are poor they must spend all their earnings, given the extremely high prices on everything they need to survive. In doing so, they create demand for products and services that can only be filled by hiring workers. So, every person who takes a job, creates roughly one net job through their demand for product. The negative economic effect of illegal immigration is that they get paid off the books, which contributes to the depletion of the social security and medicare funds. But getting paid that way also has its upside for consumers, which is lower food prices, by the same amount. It's really only a matter of who loses, with old people losing more through illegal immigration than young people. But hey, everyone hates boomers these days and republicans already want to end the Social Security system anyway, so they dont actually care. The narrative is only being used as a nationalistic method to bolster support for a party that increasingly has to exaggerate and lie to win elections.
The US needs to get back to pre-1965 immigration policies.
This video is obviously biased towards the left. With every video like this I lose more and more respect for WSJ.
anyone else distracted by the woman blue that keeps reading and shifting her eyes down and up when reading. 👀
YES!!!!!
She probably has a problem with her eyes.
I believe she has partial blindness
3:30 its a shthouse bill
It allows 1.2M illegal immigrant a year into the US
Even if that were true, trump saying 20 million illegals are coming in each year. You could have cut that by 90% by your own logic
@@patrickbateman1660Remain in Mexico would have been better.
Anyone with basic education and a clean record should be welcomed in.
All past mass migrations, from Ireland, from China, from everywhere, were boons, despite Nativism growing as a response each time.
The "takin' jerbs" argument is weak, as it ignores the fact the free market will create more jobs to provide products and services for a larger population, and provide a labour influx for new economic ventures, like small business startups. Migrants have a higher business startup rate than native born U.S citizens anyways.
If employers were held to account in the same manner that a bartender can lose their liquor license for serving a minor, the underground economy of migrant exploitation would cease.
There is resolute, bipartisan disinterest in effective reform, however.
The bill included 90m dollars for Ukraine along with many other things republicans didn’t like. As well multiple democrats voted against the bill along with the reps.
If democrats want immigrant then why the family based petition didn't move for the whole democratic term?
Blame corporate media from not pushing back daily on the constant lies from Trump and his supporters
Stop watching mainstream news. You’re being brainwashed
Remain mexico policy was good
Enough lies
God this is is the most pro democrat news without going more in depth with the complexity of the border issue. And I mean on their orders and laws that have allowed border crossing sooo easy.
She is indian
I don't like this video
You’re not fooling me WSJ
The way WSJ reporter (Michelle Hackman) communicated suggested that she’s pretty dumb.
This isn’t even a comprehensible sentence, so do you really think you should be calling others dumb?
@@Laker62282 Yup, I intended to write "The 'way'...." but sometimes my mac autodeletes words because I am using a non-English keyboard. Is it a satisfactory answer to you?
@@withoutpassid Sure, but it still suggests you shouldn’t be calling other people dumb since you sounded pretty dumb.
@@Laker62282 Feel free to say whatever you want to. Enjoy the freedom of speech as I do 😁.
So now you cand understand native americans feeling when your relatives first time come there 😂😂😂
They had to stop fighting each other finally
Interesting to see both sides focus on border security now 🤔.
Thotbot
lol i like her. Shes real "new yokers is like, yeaah we have right to shelter but we dont have no more shelters,"
Harris/Walz2024🇺🇲
Orange criminal for prison 2024❤️
This have been saying for the last 8 years u guy are lying dont fall for it
This is an one side opinion from WSJ. Don't try to label this as news.
Legal and Illegal Immigration are 2 different things…
2m entries in a 4 year period is higher than our countries average and is the highest record in American history. We're averaging 2.5m/yr, 4.5m so far this year, the growing number over 4 years is over 11.6m. How subtlety you side stepped how big that number is 😂
Kama, kama, kama, khameleon...You come and go, you come and go
Loving would be easy if your colors were like my dreams
THEY'RE EATING THE DOGS!!!!
"Nobody will ever forget that sentence. They'll be legitimately thinking of writing that on his tombstone"
Well it's true unfortunately...
@@timothytumusiime2903 hey look it’s another npc.
@@gioc610 Weird how there's no evidence and it doesn't hold up to the slightest bit of scrutiny...
Former President of Mexico Vicente Fox said the same about proctecting borders.
harris will say ANYTHING
I’m sorry, is Bollywoods finest actor AKA - KAMALA not the VP? She’s saying she will do this and that… ummm baby gurllll, are you not holding Office? 😂 what a joke!!!!
Clearly Trump's border wall was as lame as the Democrats had said from the beginning. What a waste of funds.
Trump also stole FEMA funds for his wall
Nopity nope. Only people with peanut sized brains think so.
@@withoutpassid Then what's wrong with the border security? Seems a bit contradictory from the rhetoric.
@@coachtaewherbalife8817 What’s wrong with building the wall? Does your house have walls or fences?
@@withoutpassid What did the wall do? Did it stop the immigrants? Did it slow them down? Did it help immigration officials? I want to hear your defense of the wall. I could use a good laugh.
you know usa was free for dos ther where frineds whit not the enemies
who is is reporter. she has bad timing in her speech
With no prompter or script she’s a dear in headlights
"theyre eating the dogs theyre eating the cats" and youre criticizing how kamala speaks?
@@MalakhiWtell me you are an npc without saying it.
Russian bots are spreading misinformation
This would almost be a funny comment if you knew how to spell the word "deer" lol
Left wing propaganda
DJT hasn't been in office in a term.
Next excuse, please.
Remarkable Libby nonsense.
!I recently sold some of my long-term position and currently sitting on about 250k, do you think Nvidia is a good buy right now or I have I missed out on a crucial buy period, any good stock recommendation on great performing stocks or Crypto will be appreciated.
As a beginner investor, it’s essential for you to have a mentor to keep you accountable.
Ruth Ann Tsakonas is my trade analyst, she has guided me to identify key market trends, pinpointed strategic entry points, and provided risk assessments, ensuring my trades decisions align with market dynamics for optimal returns.
I managed to grow a nest egg of around 120k to over a Million. I'm especially grateful to Adviser Ruth Ann Tsakonas, for her expertise and exposure to different areas of the market.
Without a doubt! Ruth Ann Tsakonas is a trader who goes above and beyond. she has an exceptional skill for analyzing market movements and spotting profitable opportunities. Her strategies are meticulously crafted based on thorough research and years of practical experience.
nice!! once you hit a big milestone, the next comes easier. How can i reach her, if you don't mind me asking?
look up her name on the web for her website.
2:50 perhaps Mayor Adams should fly them for free on Turkish Airlines to Istanbul :)
More propaganda please!!
Complete nonsense
300 dollar 💰 per night for a single migrant for staying in hotel
Corkery Landing
Kamala Harris really seems like the most sane choice but in America you never know if people will be able to see through the facade of Trump.
Taylor Amy Perez Patricia Rodriguez Deborah
1:51 more like 12 milion
💙Kamala 2024 and Beyond! 💙
Your name checks out at least.
@@taylorlibby7642 💙💙💙
@@taylorlibby7642 at least she is going to win. Kamala 2024 and Beyond
Im indian amercian, Naah Democrats granted illegals and muslims in our country. Trump 2024
@@Basic-wm8ufshe’ll only win if we vote. Please vote for Kamala 💙💙💙
Again I think the majority of people have the wrong mindset when it comes to the issue southern border, many people see the issue at the border as a problem rather than an opportunity that can lead to a significant boom for the US economy
To me it looks like you're taking a contrarian "mindset" on this just to have a contrarian mindset.
People who can’t speak the language and have zero skills. Explain how that is a help.
@@taylorlibby7642he's saying they already arean economic engine for the us
And that could be used to our advantage
@@Censortubescheap manual labor is always needed
@@quantumbuddhist
-We already have people for "cheap manual labor". What you're endorsing there is further devaluing that end of the labor market and making it even harder for those people to find a livable wage job. You're endorsing exploitation.
I am okay with president trump's boarder policy (partially). I support his view about building the wall but not deportation , As deportations is cruel and i don't support anyone who is pro deportation
What about the hundreds of thousands of criminals and murderers that have been allowed in? Isn't it crueler to American citizens to not deport them? Isn't it cruel to expect Americans to support millions of people who illegally crossed our borders?
@@taylorlibby7642all these criminals and murderers and no news about all those supposed crimes everywhere??
First.
Don’t click bait the headline for trump Wall Street
ar do you alll got puobe in your heads