The Moon Landing Was a Disaster...Almost
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 вер 2024
- When the lunar module starts guiding Apollo 11 in the wrong direction, experienced astronaut Neil Armstrong has to take manual control and fly the module down to the surface of the Moon.
From: SPACE VOYAGES: The Moon and Beyond
bit.ly/1mZ66IQ
I've heard several say Armstrong wasn't all that good a pilot including this latest movie "First Man” (a terrible portrayal of Armstrong BTW). Are you flipping kidding me!? Armstrong was one of the best pilots who ever lived. Few if any pilots survived more close calls then Armstrong. Which is why he was chosen for the first Moon landing. He had half his wing ripped off in Korea but managed to fly his plane back to friendly territory. How many pilots could have pulled that off? Before he became an astronaut he was a legend among test pilots. This was partly do to his very high IQ and superb understanding of aerodynamics. He flew the X-15 which only the best of the best ever got to do. At Edwards at times He did things that even surpassed Chuck Yeager. He did things that no one including Yeager would try because they would have thought it fool hardy or suicide but Armstrong knew it would work and it did. In Gemini 8 He avoided death again by recovering from a spin that would have killed most astronauts. When the flying bedstead malfunctioned He managed to eject just in time avoiding death - again! His ability to think very quickly while facing certain death and his ability to intuitively understand what an aircraft can do that was never done before was second to none!
You don't get to command an Apollo mission without being a good pilot. Yeesh.
Gemini 8.
Neil Armstrong was an amazing pilot. That is all.
An astronaught. First man on the moon. Pilots look to him like a God. I grew up with airplanes my father commanded the military aeronautics in my country. Today im a professional skateboarder and I watch Neil for inspiration. Including this morning. Be like Neil. BE OK 👌 🙂.
Neil Armstrong was an aviator!!!!
Absolutely right 👍👍👍
Such a fragile spacecraft with all systems to the limit in such epic trip to the unknown, Neil had titanium balls
Yeah, cardboard and duct tape are fragile. Even here on Earth.
.......Then he woke up and realized they weren't as tough as he was hoping...
When they came home, the public wanted answers to really deep, existential questions about their most inner thoughts, to which Aldrin commented: ”If we were the kind of people who pondered to that extent, they wouldn’t have let us go in the first place” 😅
Imagine if the camera quality was as good as today’s cameras. I really want NASA to do another landing
AMAZING MESSI just wait until 2024
@Bobross Nick LOL!!!!
That be dope!
you're in luck my friend
ARTEMIS BABAY
Believing that tin like thing landed on the moon and returned to earth is nuts
Yes, that would be nuts. The "tin can" was never designed to return to Earth. Show some respect. You don't even know which craft did what task.
the lunar module didnt return to earth.
Having 600 million people watch live back then is the equivalent of around 1.22 billion people watching live today
How is that even possible its not like population is money. I think the population doubled from 1969 to 2019 so that means there were 3.75 billion people in 1969 compared to 7.5 billion in 2019. WOW thats a lot of love making in 50 years holy.
@@jacandrahaser1219It's possible in the sense that its about what percentage of the people alive at the time watched the moon landing. So if we find the percentage of people alive in 1969 (3.6 billion) who watched the moon landing (600 million) its around 17%. 17% of todays 7.5 billion world population is 1.275 billion people.
Back then only wealthy people had TV
600 million peaple watching live in 1969.... wow ...... what a joke
.....a live movie... not a launch
Nice to see the same people who failed to reach the deepest area in sea are able to land on moon
Good point. Deepest sea is 11 miles, moon is 282,500 miles
If you do some research you will discover that every mission from Mercury forward had technical issues. Astronauts really do put their lives on the line.
The astronauts were test-pilots. Most of them.
@0:25 still the coolest looking spacesuits to this day
I love how we had the technology to go there in 1969 while pinning the american flag on the moon, while we just happen to have no satellite technology to take a picture of how it's still up there right now in 2021.
That is a lie. Sigh. American, Japanese, Indian and Chinese orbiters have taken pictures of the Apollo landing sites, and they can see the landers, footprints and yes - the flag (or at least the shadow it casts). Get your facts straight.
@@nickrose8733
You consider indiscernible black blobs as evidence?
We've all seen those 'images' and there's nothing clearly identifiable.
it’s called a telescope
Thats cuz it'd not there
Google has shown the items left by all of the Astronauts are still on the moon. Look them up yourself
"It may have been a small step for Neil, but it was huge one for me"…
Are you “Mankind”?
@@ljk075 I don't know. It's on my wishlist, though
Let's face it, they had a good stick flying the thing and it proved man can out think a computer when his ass is on the line.
rickd248 I'm surprised that thing even flew with the weight of Neils balls on board rest in peace Mr. Armstrong.
I’m late but this is still very true
their spacecraft literally had less computational ability than the key fob for your car. they got the most out of it
Thanks america for winning the cold war because of that we have our freedom thank you very much😊😊😘😘💕💕💕💖💖💝💝💝from philippines
@@peabody3000
YOU SAID: "their spacecraft literally had less computational ability than the key fob for your car. they got the most out of it"
== No, not literally. The Apollo computer was more powerful than your key fob. If memory serves, it could do 80,000 calculations per second. But, yeah, that's nothing by today's standards.
It looks so funny when they run
Genji
That's because it's fake
1/6th of earth's gravity so they weighed barely 30 pounds on the moon, but their suits and backpack gear also weighed at least as much as the astronauts
I will speak oh inferior hoaxtard, STFU. You are ignorant.
Because the wires they were hooked up to you to make them look like they were floating they fall down and the wire guys are still pulling them up
aunt jenifer riiiight... and then they had Pixar clean the wires out. Because the world is flat, and the sun is at cloud level... ugh.
Many sources point to the fact that they were never more than 300 miles above the earth's orbit. They did circulate around for eight days before touching down on earth. This was a brilliant drama in the script to make it more engaging, more 'real'. Whatever, the directors must be credited for pulling off such a gigantic show. The US was/is number when it comes to make-believe. Salute!
The "many sources" are conspiracy videos. Sorry, they're always wrong. Why would you believe them? And, if you think they stayed in Earth orbit for 8 days, then how do you explain how Spain photographed the SIVB fuel dumps around the moon? How do you explain the numerous countries that tracked Apollo missions with radar and/or radio telescopes, including enemies? It wasn't just the USA that tracked the missions. The Soviets did too. And, numerous other countries tracked the missions, Madagascar, England, Spain, Australia, Guam, Turks & Caicos, Bahamas, Canary Islands, etc. (the list goes on). How do you explain that? How do you explain how any backyard amateur was able to aim a 2 foot dish or Yagi antenna at the moon, and receive Apollo's audio transmissions? How do you explain how Parkes/Canberra, Madrid, an Goldstone were able to aim their DSN dishes at the moon and receive Apollo's video transmissions?
And consilience of evidence points to the fact that they did in fact land on the Moon.
@@Jan_Strzelecki facts, logic, and wisdom points you in a better direction than bandwagon fallacies, and they prove that they never landed on the moon, can't ever land on the moon, we're not spinning around the sun, and we definitely can't ever colonize Mars... I mean cool stories for sure but in the end I guess, fairy tales can't ever ascend any further than make-belief where they belong. 🤷🏽♂️
@@agustingarcia6079 _facts, logic, and wisdom points you in a better direction than bandwagon fallacies,_
They do, yes.
Facts, logic, and wisdom indicate that the Moon landings were real and that the Earth is round and spinning around the Sun.
Bandwagon fallacies proclaim that the Moon landings are fake and that Earth is flat.
The great thing is seeing all the hate comments saying
“This is fake cause I can’t accept the truth”
A Literal Cat • 69 Years ago TRUE
You call it hate because you take it that way, because you have low self-esteem.
Ummm...I’m no historian, but I’m pretty sure the LM computer DIDNT take them in the wrong direction. What happened was that the computer took them to far along their trajectory, and they overshot their target site: Armstrong noticed that the area which the computer was flying them toward was strewn with boulders, and that landing there would be too risky.
True
As I recall, the computer was thrown off by the spinning of the LEM (change in yaw) to get the communications restored, and thus had to calculate a new landing site, which was indeed strewn with boulders. The computer was also emitting alarms because it was overloaded due to a hardware malfunction of the radar pointing at the CM. No doubt, Armstrong lost faith in the computer which the astronauts were skeptical of to begin with, so he took control.
Armstrong said the LM flew easily by hand, far easier than the simulators.
@jimmy jimmy
There's no desert on the moon.
N. Armstrong is a straight up badass
Neil A. Backwards is A. lien
Nice one Einstein.
Issac backwards without the first and last letters is "ass"
And?
@@TheDjackso1 NOTHING MORE TO ADD ;)
Neil Armstrong is an anagram of
*'strong liar men'* ...,
which refers to the trinity of the three astronauts and what they needed to be.
At 2:37, you can spot three white dots in a small crater like depression, the crater is dark but the white dots are still there. What are they?
Studio lights.
I would imagine they're the directors.
None of you find it fishy that we haven't gone back in half a century?
Fishy? Do you understand anything about how these massive government programs work? They ran the Apollo program for about 15 years, culminating in 9 manned moon missions (6 of which landed), and then for a few years as the applied Apollo programs such as Skylab and Apollo-Soyuz. How long did you expect them to run the Apollo program? It was 50 years between when Magellan sailed around the globe and when that was repeated. Was that fishy? It was 4000 years between the great pyramids and the next time mankind ever tried to build anything that big again. Was that fishy? It was 50 years between the first dive of Mariana Trench (deepest ocean depth) and the next time it was done. Was that fishy? Right now, this very minute, Artemis 1 is sitting on a launch pad with an Orion capsule on top, getting prepared to send a capsule to the moon for the first time since 1972, basically about 50 years later. That's pretty normal for these massive programs in human history.
It costs billions of dollars and they did it six times. It wasnt going to be an annual event, you know.
The most magnificent event in my lifetime. Followed by Australia winning the America's Cup.
Why do people refuse to believe in something so amazing?
They have nothing better to do with there lives.
Why they don't have anything better to do in their lives? ITS JUST A OPINION to THEM
It's so amazing that it's impossible.
because its a lie. how can they have a camerman there before neil armstrong walks down. the cameraman must have sleept there in the moon and waited for armstrong. hhha. you see a rocket launch a thats it it lands some where in the ocean. and the show pictures inside the rocket the crew, the crew is in some room and faking it. he is saying armstrong is taking manuel control is if it he has been there before and in 1960if there is if were some thing called automatic is if the modul would know were to go. what a lot of crap.
@@limitex7908
When Armstrong started to descend the ladder, he pulled a handle which opened a compartment on the side of the lunar module (the MESA), and, inside this compartment, there was a camera which started to film the descent of Armstrong; but the camera was turned in bias, and that's why we can see the lunar horizon which is not horizontal, but bent instead; but, in that case, why didn't Armstrong also appear bent, and appeared straight on the video instead?
This is a hint that the sequence was fake.
Let's do it again
you'd think within 50 years we would have.
Well, NASA said they have lost all the data and could no longer do it.🤔
Disaster?? Where?? In studio?? 😂😂
Men never reached moon. How can be difficult,.or danger?
It is not and never posibble to land on the moon, the moon is a plasma: just a light! And about 80km from earth like the sun, and also flat, want proof? Ask me, I'll send you all the prove!
PLEASE NEVER SAY "the moon landing" THERE WERE 5 OF THEM!
6 actually
There was none of them.
Ya sure there were 12 landings just fixing your answer and out of all of them 4 survived
@@jjgarcia9642 12 landings?
@@pascalxavier3367 yes 12
a Giant lie for man kind lol
Nobody have ever landed on the Moon if they could have done it with the technology back year ago why haven’t they been up there ever since? as they are much more advanced now.
Adrian Gill
What advance? Warp engines? No. Teleports? No
Pan Cytryna lots of the other technology have advanced, but as in engines not much has changed, and trying to avoid chunks of space debris when a rocket is traveling over 17,000 it’s impossible as the rocket cannot manoeuvre out of the way, then we have what is called the VanAllan’s belt so I do not believe anyone have actually walked on the moon.
Adrian Gill - I hope you realise there were 5 [FIVE] different Moon missions, that landed on the Moon? Last was in 1973.
After then - it was obvious that it is a waste of money to go to the moon, and collect rocks and sand: so funds were diverted more to Space Stations development, and the Space Shuttle.
That is why there have been no new Moon missions.
Please educate yourself.
Yman83464 ok how could a rocket avoid anything when it’s traveling at over 17,000 and not get damaged as there is supposed to be lots of space junk? also I do not believe man have actually walked on the moon, if the moons gravity can pull the oceans that would kill a person even in a space suit as a large percentage of us is partly made up of water, they say when on the moon they gravity is less but no it can’t be as when it pulls the oceans on planet Earth we have massive tides... I think for myself I don’t need to be educated thank you very much.
ASMR GOD so we have meteorites made up from certain materials and metals being one of them and then you have a rocket traveling very fast and so a meteorite and if that hits the rocket no damage at those height velocities lol, maybe you don’t know about velocity and impact, I think I do know about gravity lol... So you call yourself GOD do you know what god is? Well I can tell you haha, god is the primordial force which is made up of both energies of darkness and light as one, this is why us sacred clowns, shaman (Heyoka’s) painted themselves it black and white to show we can manipulate both energies of darkness and light (black+white) basically god is the universal energy that originated everything its a part of everything but us Heyoka’s are considered to be closer to what others call GOD but i sooner call it the primordial force, god ain’t good or bad it’s and equally force of both energies of darkness and light... You won’t find anything on google about this, so just think for yourself and never go by some of the things that you learn in school is it’s lies that they want to believe in such as what this planets core is made up from, they have not got a clue as nobody have dug that dip into this planet I think they have only gone about 7 odd miles deep so how an earth do they know... So in future please think for one self you might surprise how intelligent you are but not reading what other people have thought or want you to believe in.
This is the country that has NASA & HOLLYWOOD...
Exactly
So what did they do for six hours after they landed?
The only spent about 2 and 1/2 hours on the moon the rest of the time it was getting ready to go out and then getting ready to go back up
Went to McDonald's in Burbank.
They were injected with a shot to knock them out. Operation PaperClip MKultra then brainwashed them to say they went to the moon or your whole family will die if you don't lie.
What most actors do, they drank whisky and played cards.
Was there enough oxygen and electricity to keep them there for that long?
The Moon is made of cheese. With holes, a Dutch cheese. Isn't that something, hey?
Prefer his definitive statement from Neil
Sounds yummy! Anybody for some fondue?
the closest Nasa got to the moon was Nevada
Late Micheal Jackson has also walked’ What’s the big deal 😂
No sweat. For us astronaughts that is. 😎🙋♂️💜
It must have been tough spending all that time in the moon suit on the movie set and in the LEM simulator, but it was worth it. If anyone ever does go to the moon, they will remember Neil and his great acting.
The earth is just a distant marble? please explain
Armstrong got the job bc as a former X-15 pilot he had more experience in flying rocket planes then anyone in NASA did
mcdivitt had experience flying the X-15
There's a simple experiment you can conduct that proves that the moon landing was real. They had reflectors placed on the moon and you can send a laser beam that will bounce off and be sent back and you can pick up the signal on your own receiver! So, yeah... It's always fun to learn, right?
Well, it's not proof of humans on moon. Many spacecrafts from multiple countries landed on moon. Any of them could leave refractor. It doesn't prove Neil Armstrong was there. But it is true that he was there. Your argument is just too weak.
Considering the plethora of evidence regarding the Apollo program, it seems as though to some people, *nothing* is good enough and everything is *too weak*. What I'd like to know is, *what* could they have done more to convince these people?
Apollo 14's retro-reflector was deployed by Alan Shepard February 5, 1971 at 18:04:06 UTC and detected by McDonald Observatory in Texas just 7 hours later while the astronauts were still on the surface after EVA 1 and before EVA 2. So we know a man-made object is sitting at Apollo 14's landing site, and it just so happened to show up there while the Apollo 14 astronauts were still there. That's good enough for me, or it's at least way more convincing than "I don't know where they were...they just weren't on the moon, ok???"
right. shut up they reflectors on the moon, if they did soo then why dont they build house there then an colonise it for 60 years ago sinc we where there
False you can do this test of the laser beam without pointing at any specific location it will go back the same way due to the composition of the lunar ground which is a surface particularly reflective.
@@limitex7908
The reason we didn't go back is because it's bloody expensive to send any human to the Moon and bring them back safely, not even bringing up how complicated it is.
The crucial thing, though, is that the _primary reason_ America went to the Moon in the first place was a direct response to the growing threat of USSR rocket superiority. Up to that point, we'd been playing catch-up, and it wasn't until the experimenting done with _Gemini_ where we finally surpassed them. Then finally, the landing in 1969 and that gave America the trophy. _But,_ after all the millions (billions?) of dollars spent on _Apollo,_ Congress started to not care anymore because the competition had been won. So they yanked the funding for three additional missions, and it ended with _Apollo 17,_ and we went back to taunting and flexing our nuclear muscles at the Russians for another 20 years.
Landing on the Moon had _nothing_ to do with scientific technological advancement- those were actually side benefits- and _everything_ to do with play catch-up. Once we caught up, the drive to go back to the Moon disappeared within five years. Tragic, but true.
If I had to place money on which country would land a human on the Moon again, I'd bet on *China,* who would do it more for bragging rights than any technical achievement. Russia is too unstable and they don't give a shit, and America is too wrapped up in its stupidity and self-inflicted petty bickering to pay any attention.
Well done, Humans!! Incredible intelligence!
Voice of REASON
Thank u
What about the guy holding the camera when the moon lander took off & it shifted upwards with the moon lander. Did they leave someone behind? Like the camera man? And if it was remote controlled or Bluetooth into the moon lander when it took off, why did it stop recording after it hit the roof of the studio.....I mean go 30 ft into space to leave the orbit and stopped recording footage?. Orbit off the moon was several kilometres high & if the camera was a live feed shouldn’t there be more footage of the moon lander floating away?
1969
bluetooth was not around at the time
plus the fact that it was beamed across the globe
Nasa sent the return feed from the camera to news stations everywhere
and the news stations might have thought well they're taking off now
and oh the thrust knocked over the camera huh better switch to a new view
not to mention apollo 11
was 2 vehicles stuck together
the command module
that seats 3
and the lunar exploration module
that seats 2
as for the camera it may have been connected to the module
but as it took off it tilted up from the vibration of the engine
and it went to batteries
and back then the batteries might have been not tested to work in space so it may have just streamed that up and then died
316SR rotlmao!!!!! It hit the roof alright!!! Someone had to stay behind for a von voyage happy ending lol!!!
Oh my fucking god reading all of your comments gave me cancer. The footage you are referring to of the Lunar Module taking off from the moon is from Apollo 17. NASA had previously failed to capture this shot due to the time delay of 7 seconds to the moon causing them to misjudge the command controls of the camera to view the takeoffs. They only attempted to take this video when they had the Lunar rover on the later missions, as it was left behind and had a radio controlled camera already on it. So this is how the footage was taken, not with a cameraman you fucking moron.
@@slycooper1001 what an idiot
You're an imbecile.
When the first flight director is a legit elf
Forget the Saturn V, Chris Kraft could've flapped his ears and gotten them into orbit.
as everyone knows the apollo 11 mission had no remote control camera from earth, who moved the camera at minute 4:07?
It was attatched to the LM
Wait. We really DID land on the moon? For real? I thought it was just some early reality TV show or something.
Not you and me but 12 men actually did that. Armstrong, Aldrin, Conrad, Bean, Sheperd,Mitchell, Scott, Irwin, Young, Duke, Cernan and Schmitt. So there you are.
Well, can't get no more better proof than that.
I love how they scramble all over the place in happiness
3:01 is he smoking ????
Back then that was common... unfortunately
Sadly Yes
I think it is a pen
Oh yeah. In those days smoking was as common as chewing gum. There were actually designated "No Smoking" areas in hospitals. Which meant the rest of the hospital was free to light up. Weird, huh?
yes...
When in internet lives ..moon landing dies😭😭😭😭
Dont worry mars landing and NASA said they will go back to moon in 2024
I like Neil armstrong
The moon’s surface shuts down any source of electronic machine because of its intense temperature. If the moon’s temperature raises to 300c during the day drops to -300 during the night, how in the hell that machine returned with no damages or frozen before took off to earth. Why did they go there and why are they not going now?
Donald James First, the measurements were being made in Kelvin - Not Farenheit.
Secondly, they thought of that. So much so that the equipment was amazingly strong, both in terms of resilience and transmission.
jim oberg there are no day night cycles on the moon...the day on the moon is start to finish 28 days
@@gerryvandepol8666 Yes, there are day/night cycles on the moon. The sun rises and sets just like it does on Earth - every 29.5 days.
These temperatures are 1) of the surface of the moon, and 2) the absolute extremes. This is the HOTTEST the surface gets and the COLDEST the surface gets. The moon's days are REALLY long, so there are areas of the surface that are in direct sunlight for two weeks straight, and other areas in darkness for two weeks straight. Heat transfer takes a very long time in a vacuum. You seem to want to believe that anything exposed to sunlight IMMEDIATELY jumps up to the absolute hottest extreme and anything in shadow IMMEDIATELY drops to the lowest extreme. It doesn't work that way Since the Apollo missions always landed during the lunar morning, the surface temperatures were never at either extreme, and they were never there long enough to heat up to those temperatures. They also had shielding to reflect most of any heat away. There is absolutely no reason to expect any components would have been subjected to temperatures outside of their nominal operating temps.
YOU SAID: "The moon’s surface shuts down any source of electronic machine because of its intense temperature."
== Really? Wow, and none of the engineers who worked on those things bothered to do anything about it, huh? How many thousands of people are in on "the hoax" (in your mind)? The engineers who worked on the ALSEPs, oh, nope, none of them built the machines to work on the moon, nope, they just participated in the hoax. The LEM, nope, none of the thousands of people at Grumman and NASA bothered to make the thing work at the moon, nope, they just built the thing to be a hoax, and nobody ever said a word about it.
YOU SAID: "If the moon’s temperature raises to 300c during the day"
== Um, no. Not by a long shot. It doesn't even get up to 300 F, let alone 300 C. Don't be ridiculous.
YOU SAID: "drops to -300 during the night"
== Um, dumbass, NOTHING can get to -300 C. That's past absolute zero, the lowest temperature possible. You have NO IDEA what you're talking about.
YOU SAID: "how in the hell that machine returned with no damages or frozen before took off to earth."
== Because they landed in the lunar morning, long after the ultra-low temperatures, and long before the ultra-high temperatures. And, also, in a vacuum, heat doesn't really transfer very well, so extreme surface temperatures aren't the type of problem you ignoramuses think it is.
YOU SAID: "Why did they go there"
== As a display of cold war technological power.
YOU SAID: "and why are they not going now?"
== There is no cold war.
For all those claiming the Moon landings were faked - Ok, we hear you, you win.
We will go push off our tapes and other memorabilia off the edge of the Flat Earth now... The world is Flat, there is no Global Warming, and Elvis still lives!
Hahaha!
@King Aubameyang NASA is complete bullshit just rich kids that are so called the smartest humans alive fuck outta here the only way we could really reach something in life is through ourselves we humans are literal god's on earth but we don't even realize it if we pushed ourselver to the limits everyday the things we could do would be insane
@King Ninja - They didn't spend much time in the Van Allen Belt and not all electronics malfunction if they are robust enough.
@@Suhawk75 really? As a telecommunications engineer I hate to burst your bubble...:-)
And Neil parks it close to a UFO base.
The full quote from Armstrong himself is “that’s one small step for A man, one giant leap for mankind”
That was his intended quote, but he was so overwhelmed with excitment, awe, etc, that he forgot to say one word.
@@Rauruatreides I read his autobiography. 10/10 recommendations
He claimed he thought it up himself but it was straight from a scriptwriters pen.
After listening to the recording, Armstrong agreed that the “a” is not there.
2.25. Charlie Duke? Collins, Armstrong, Aldrin were the names, not Duke.
3:44 Why 6 hours?
I believe apollo 8 on X-mas eve actually had a bigger viewing audience.
I’ve just come from the Smithsonian and one of the old NASA guides told me the Lunar Module was pressurised and the astronauts didn’t need to wear their suits when travelling in it. If that thing I saw was pressurised I’ll give the game away. The thing was held together with sheet metal and rivets and that thermal blanket stuff held on with tape. Hardly airtight.
It was pressurized to 4.8 psi. The vacuum of space would have been...well....zero psi, so the pressure differential it had to withstand was....4.8 psi. A bag of potato chips packaged in California and shipped to Colorado is withstanding a greater pressure differential.
So, Dan, basically, even if you're a moon conspiratard, you're saying that Apollo 9 never happened, huh? And, you're saying that the thousands of engineers at Grumman and NASA simply forgot to make it airtight, huh? All of those many rounds of pressure testing (including the infamous one where the window blew out, and they never fully figured out why), those tests never happened, huh? Oh, you're a real genius. Tell me, how many thousands upon thousands of people were in on your version of "the hoax," if absolutely basic things didn't function?
Thank you. And, was it big enough to hold a car?
@@rockethead7 no thousands of people if it was a hoax genius.
God bless neil..
Neil Armstrong backwards is Gnorts Mr. Alien
Now that's a reality show!
At 3:52 , did the narrator say "6 hours after landing"? Armstrong and Aldrin spent 6 hours in the module on the surface of the moon before stepping out?
After they suited up, check after check was conducted on the Lunar Lander, their equipment, and most importantly and extensively, their own spacesuits to ensure they were ready to step out and begin their research. Last thing you want on the first moon landing is for a spacesuit to malfunction and kill its wearer.
6 hours 21 minutes 29 seconds from touchdown until the hatch was opened.
Yep, they had time to eat some lunch. Get there space suits on and then Neil Armstrong became the first man to walk in the moon.
Way to oversell it there, NASA-ite.
@@robyrobyroby12345 Can you imagine live that moment? My God.
150000 pound jet engine used to land and not a dent in the dirt or dust anywhere? Did they vacuum the dust of the pod feet for the photo? Closeups show dustless parts...
there was lots of dust. one of the later landings kicked up much less dust, as the commander said while they were landing. but go ahead and keep pretending its all fake ;)
@@peabody3000 ..Asking questions isnt about pretending its all fake ;)
@@tajatajat well if you're really asking, hopefully i was able to answer in part at least
@@peabody3000 sort of..where did the dust go..on closeups the landing craft legs and feet are clean as a whistle..i do wonder
@@tajatajat i wouldn't necessarily expect much dust there. the bottom of the rocket wasn't positioned above the feet, it went very nearly as far down as the legs did, which is why they always had to cut engines the moment the contact light went off, which sent them coasting unpowered for the last foot or so, landing with a bump. they kicked up plenty of dust but with zero lunar atmosphere, all the dust would have shot away from the rocket like tiny bullets, and would not have mixed with air that would disburse it into a fog that would hang around the lander
The Moon Landing Was a Real...Almost
@Richardson Productions lol and how are you so sure because of the footage you just seen lmfao ok buddy
Richardson Productions there’s no use trying to argue with them. They have willingly chosen to be ignorant.
It was real in area 51.
One big step for man, one giant leap for man kind
Why Neil..Armstrong. .landed on the moon..after 6hours..of eagle landed on moon..what is the..technical reason behind..that we need explanation from experts no vedio interpreted this..
Yo where are all the stars?
Disaster, almost? Why? Did they almost land on top of the studio at Burbank?
I thought they filmed it in the deserts of Nevada? Or in Canada.? Or was it Greenland? I forget. You guys need to get your conspiracy stories straight.
@@dmtjht143 why would you want to film a 70 year old woman? Do you have some kind of grandma fetish?
@@casanovafrankenstein4193 For sure the only place in this Earth with the horizon close at 1 mile distance. Moon deniers are simply hilarious.
@@valentinotera3244 do you know that the moon landscape is the easiest to fake out of any possible landscape? solid black piece of paper over the film to create the starless sky. add in a little more nuance for other shots.
2:35 that is weird steering
I could see Stanley Kubrick walking around in the background of the mission control set
BS Om the Stanley Kubrick B>S!!!!
Stanley no doubt was very anxious about the paper Moon lander holding up under those Burbank klieg lights.
It is fake why didn’t anyone went there again it has been more than 45 years til now like half century are you serious
hey we should come up with a conspiracy that the sun and the moon is flat
🤵As kids all we Had was a free a stick to poke at things & hit a can etc then one day the teachers sat us around a b/w TV on a sunny afternoon grade 2 1969 8 yr old Unsure what was going on so long ago but seemed like last year one of the most amazings things Human did to the moon a feat unheard of in the day 👍 good memorys
This is why America is great and has always been an exceptional country, be proud, be very proud of your country.
They might go closer the moon and put many thing there but they never landed on the moon.
U didn't think they were gonna go what 270000 miles with out one small problem did u...I know they expected some little glitches,it don't get any better...270000 miles and the computer was a mile and half off,leaving a moving target and landing on another moving target,piece of cake...hah hah
They look funny when they try to walk
EnvY_CODM If you had all the sensors, electrical monitors taped on ir inserted into your body, and tubing stuck up where the light don’t shine plus your oxygen and air conditioning devices to carry while you get the ‘Good to go’, you would be walking a bit peculiarly as well. Each astronaut’s suit is custom built at a cost nearing a million bucks, has to have flexibility, be fireproof, radiation resistant without using metal, it ain’t easy. All their food and liquid intake is carefully planned and measured; and all their wastes are measured and evaluated. There are no secrets at NASA . Still wanna be an astronaut.?
Great filmography
I was born in the wrong era.
I was born in that era and now I am old but that's perfectly ok with me. What an achievement.
i know it was real because my grandparents had taken photographs of the tv of the livefeed from the moon
and they made a few copies for me because im real big into space stuff
vaultboy 124 True. Don’t listen to the conspiracy nutjobs.
can't rule out that Stanley Kubrick fx'ed it...
@@duggydugg3937 you actually CAN rule it out if you have enough info, which is easily accessible
@@peabody3000
So you are a True Believer? Your government wouldn't lie? You see no discrepancies in the government narrative?
@@duggydugg3937 oh, my gov't has lied about many terrible things. especially where war is concerned. i was raised religious and i'm an atheist now. i don't believe anything anyone says without strong evidence. but the evidence for apollo is truly overwhelming. i'll throw one piece at you.. if it had been staged, russia would have been the first to know. they had their antennas pointed at the spacecraft and monitored the conversations, the data, everything. so unless you think they were in on the supposed fraud too, that has to be worthy of your consideration at least. and no, i don't see actual discrepancies. i've heard all about the controversies but i'm also very scientifically literate, and i know a lot about the apollo program in general. really, it would have been harder to fake the 10 years of missions than to really do it
IF THEY REALLY WENT then how could it be so dreary and bore? And the most thrilling event in modern history a impossible trick (puton spacesuits unaided)
What "trick" are you referring to
@@marthaindahouse1010 the spacesuits. Buzz helped Neil suit up then he need do himself. He use bare hands to connect top, pants/boots and helmet. Then he glove one hand, linking seals. FINALLY, he put on other glove, but he need to use gloved hand to link seals, to tweak the connection cuz a perfect 100% seal made b4 he pressurize (Neil wait to pressurize his suit IN CASE buzz have problem, some dirt cause leak- so IF BUZZ NEED UNSUIT due to leak in pant joint say , neil could unsuit to help buzz fix leak- no use wasting oxy/power by. pressurizing so Both press. same time -in case!) ie TRICK
Oh
3:53 this must have killed the Russians being beat by United States 🇺🇸
Finish your sentence. …" in fooling the rest of the world."
@@frisbee544 Do you actually believe that the landing was fake?
Why do people think this is fake?
Because it would be impossible to do a live feed on tv 3 DAYS away from earth. But ima believa!
Chrominoid Pro Well, why is it impossible? You are an expert right?
Inbae Jin. Because they hate America
@@yassm I don't think he understands the concept of satellites. In fact he probably thinks that cell phone communication is a hoax aswell. Because we all know that it's impossible to put satalites into orbit. Smh.
Because there are too many anomalies.
Can’t go to the moon, there is the van allen radiation belt around the earth, they could not have gotten thru this.
The Apollo missions flight path was designed to pass through the thinnest parts of the Van Allen belts. The astronauts spent very little time in the belt.
Joanie............you must be a millennial.
Why can't the get through the Van Allen Belts exactly?
i really need attention from strangers real badly.. so im gonna claim that the moon landings never happened and hope that people get mad enough to talk to me!!
ree
How’re ya doin’, kid? Still living in us mama’s basement? Since you’re so smart, why not get a job?
Nixon called them on a rotary phone but we do not have the technology to go back???..!! OK!
The last sentence on this video says it all... Bunch of 'sheeple'.
Let me guess, you believe the earth is flat too?
Patricia - people who believe the earth is flat are morons, just like the 'sheeple' who believe everything the corrupt US govt tells them...
Sparticus Rex Wow, look at you. So special! You deny historical events which we have evidence happened!
Just look up “Moon reflectors”. Tell me what ya think.
Neil Armstrong asked people to remove truth’ protective layers, what did he mean
He meant to encourage people to search for explanations about how the world around us works.
He also said that conspiracy theories are of no concern to him, because one day somebody is going to go fly back to the Moon and pick up that camera he left there.
Y'all believe in the moon???
Theofficialcraigsmith
Ya’ll believe in the e a r t h?
Lol, the biggest bul.... in history
Yeah sure
Oscar awards goes to america
This we call hollywood tricks film
This comment section is something else dawg💀 the amount of people who genuinely think that the moon isn't real and probably also thi k that the earth is flat is scary
Mission accomplished -🌘-
3:52 What is this stange movement in the shadow?
You mean the reflections on the inside of the window?
RPdigital : Dat’s de Boogeyman, wisenheimer.
Last sentence says it all global television audience please wake up we humans are smarter then this
serbia991 go back to your flat earth society meeting
@@cayliegh1861 go back to letting the government feed you lies
serbia991 and you’re also a pervert. Good to know how reliable you are.
@@cayliegh1861 lol believe what you wish you are being mislead do some research and pervert ? How lol your fucked do some research or shut the fuck up
serbia991 Ironic how you ask us to “do research” but you don’t do anything either.
Also, keep getting distracted from the REAL conspiracies. While you discuss about the Apollo program, your government is ripping off oil from other countries. Sheep.
I know, the boom operator got in the way😂
Why was Ireland not in the space race?
jimmyfly
Idk why but this feel set up
It's really a shame that alldren went to the grave with that lie on his lips.
chales dor You’re an idiot.
Aldrin is still alive. And he didn’t lie.
buzz lightyear in a recent vid says to a little schoolgirl *we didn't go'
chales dor
It was Armstrong actually, and in his defence he dropped some cryptic clues that we never went.
Neil asked people to remove truth’ protective layers
They did this with a computer comparable to the one currently in your car. Smart people. Amazing achievement.
yankees29
The fuck are you taking about?
IOS Gamer The computer aboard the orbiter and the lunar module was, by today’s standards, incredibly weak. But at the time, it was a marvel. That’s what he meant.
Where are the people who think moonlanding a hoax?
There are a lot of here in the comment section. Kinda like those idiots. Very funny.
moonlanding realize we are in superstition
3min23sec...turn on the air blower. See the extremely tidy jets!!! . This looks as convincing as joe 90 & thunderbirds.
History made!