Better Than $1000 Watches? San Martin SN0144-GX Review! Red Dial!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 26

  • @worthwhilewatches
    @worthwhilewatches 6 днів тому +3

    Nice review! It is a great watch!

  • @510Live
    @510Live 4 дні тому +1

    It’d be nice to see you pull the bracelet and test the 316L SS with a magnet. Nice video, subbed.

    • @RageAgainstTime
      @RageAgainstTime  4 дні тому +1

      Hey there! Good thought! Just did it with a random fridge magnet and it didn't stick. Of course, it might not be the best way to do it but that's what I have at this time..
      Thank you for the sub! I appreciate it

    • @510Live
      @510Live 4 дні тому +1

      @ That’s plenty good. I always feel like they’re using pot metal, cheap alloy with these types of watches because of the price point.

    • @RageAgainstTime
      @RageAgainstTime  4 дні тому

      I had the same feeling before I started checking them out. But the steel seems similar to my Omega and TAG Heuer but I'm not a steel specialist 😅

  • @jaredstephenson6468
    @jaredstephenson6468 5 днів тому +1

    Great review. Consider me subscribed!

  • @josephkelly1909
    @josephkelly1909 7 днів тому +2

    I wish this was 1 mm larger

  • @perrydol6098
    @perrydol6098 5 днів тому +1

    To bad they changed the level of “gradient”?
    Its to bright now.

    • @RageAgainstTime
      @RageAgainstTime  4 дні тому +2

      Hey there! I actually like it like this. Haven't seen the other dial in person but from other UA-cam videos, thought they were too dark across the hour markers.. With this new version, the dial details, I believe, are more appreciated.
      Thanks for watching!

  • @AMore429
    @AMore429 4 дні тому

    Proportion of dial size to dial furniture is off

    • @RageAgainstTime
      @RageAgainstTime  4 дні тому

      Could you elaborate more? I don't see it off?

    • @AMore429
      @AMore429 3 дні тому

      Looks like the markers are slight too small. Too much negative space for a watch that size. Casio edifice does a better job at proportions for same size for only about $130.

    • @RageAgainstTime
      @RageAgainstTime  3 дні тому +1

      Hmmm that's completely subjective. I can say the same about any watch... I could complain that Panerai doesn't have minute markers if that's the critique...

    • @AMore429
      @AMore429 3 дні тому

      @ amount of negative space in a watch isn’t subjective. Whether you’re ok with it or not is subjective part. A skyscraper is a tall building. Whether you think it’s very tall or slightly tall is subjective.

    • @AMore429
      @AMore429 3 дні тому

      @ you could say it about any watch but you will be wrong many times. There are watches that have the proportion dialed in, no pun intended. I mentioned one for comparison which you ignored and brought a panarai. Let’s try to compare apples to apples. No problem just a good discussion.

  • @DrDoohickey
    @DrDoohickey 4 дні тому

    They may be upping their game, but your macros just show us how poor the finish is on these pieces.

    • @RageAgainstTime
      @RageAgainstTime  4 дні тому

      Could you elaborate where it looks poor so I can improve on the critical aspects of it?

    • @DrDoohickey
      @DrDoohickey 4 дні тому +1

      At a glance, the edges of the indices are rough, and the quality of the brushing is variable from the top of the case to the chamfer on the bezel. The polishing is just okay. Not bad for the price, but doesn't stack up to Mido, Hamilton etc.

    • @RageAgainstTime
      @RageAgainstTime  4 дні тому +3

      The indices might be my macro lens fault as it's not that great but I see what you mean with the brushing. I don't think it's bad for the price point though. I think my TAG Heuer is similar and cost me almost $1.5k more.. the Omega is far superior but so is the price.. comparing this to a Citizen that costs the same, this watch is way superior.