He’s already patented all this stuff and proved it. It’s easy to sound intelligent when you’re just posting a comment and don’t have any research at all done. I don’t know how you’re typing honestly, when you have one thumb up your ass.
Thank you! Idk why people are entertaining his "theory" that a literal 8 year old learning how to do multiplication in elementary school could disprove 🤣
@@mpkgotbeatz2061 You have 1, but zero times. So you don't have 1 because you have it zero times. The first part of a multiplication is a hypothetical, it's an incomplete or unsolvable equation until you get the second part.
It is wrong, common sense went out the windows with mathematics. 1x0 can not equal 0 because you still have something there, the "1" 0x0 is 0 1x1 is 2 2x1 is 3 etc you are all wrong and it's actually funny living to man made standards and not looking deeper into what reality puts in front of us.
The funny thing is his point went right over your head. He’s saying what we learned is wrong. It’s funny to me how instead of actually thinking about what he is saying people just dismiss it. This is what’s wrong with the world today.
@@SpiritualguyyyHe just claimed that 1x1=2. Unless that second 1 is a variable that equals 2, the statement is completely wrong. Do you have more context than the rest of us do?
Terrence Howard doesn't agree with the periodic table of elements and neither does Chuck Norris, because the only element Chuck Norris cares about is the element of surprise.
But Terrence knows precisely how Chuck did it! Chuck has 1 infinity which he multiplies by 1 infinity = 2 infinity. I don't get it, but if we're going to believe a dude who identifies as a toaster's crumbs then ...
Yeah but what Terrence is arguing is not Kindergarten math it’s more philosophy. It’s more in the realm of how zero wasn’t widely used in math until millennia after basic math was established.
This what ppl used to call Tesla and other genius for challenging conventional science at that time until they proved everyone wrong remember when ppl thought the world was flat and you would fall of the edge of you to too far west ? Then colon did and discovered a new continent everything is relative my brother don’t be a hater
@@rickyz8531 That's exactly what it is. Multiplication is just repeated addition. 1 x 3 is 1+1+1 (1 three times). What Terrence fails to realize is 1 x 1 is just 1 a single time and not 1+1.
Yeah. He was too stupid to do the math on avengers, he released himself from millions and millions of dollars, he was certainly too stupid to see the pot of gold t the end of the rainbow, he and ed norton and eric bana were too stupid to catch a ride on the avengers train.
he calls walking faster man get it right!!! and thats only bc crawling had already been established and he knew he couldn't get away with another controversy 😂
I mean conceptually you're not far off and the fact nobody here seems to see it is scary. You can not have 1x0 because you can't have absolutely no energy. It's impossible. And the fact that the idea of nothing does exist within our mathematics, makes everything after, infinitely wrong as well. That's literally how simple his concept is. Our multiplication does not fit what our actual reality is, and he's right.
Well saying "that's how I invented dltangental math" ego screams validation bc we all know to truly learn and create it's a group affair so who are his teachers and collaborators bc this screams pretentious
You looking at a 5D problem with 3D glasses bruh. NOW LETS TOAST so How bout you go grab you beer & I grab mines which is one times one & we say "CHEERS" to two beers. 🍻 'ALL YA FUNDAMENTALS ARE OFF'
@@freindlyghost4829 I ain't drinking a beer with you you can't even formulate a coherent sentence. You use improper grammar. Nothing you say has any validty because it's immediately discredited by the simple fact you can't even do something as basic as speak.
Dude had over 70+ patents that’s global companies use till this day. He invented a few things, I think you’re just stuck on the internet too much to do some research before you start typing. Before you reply, go look his shit up.
Yeah but "celebrity" is doing some heavy lifting. The only reason you know this dude is because of the unhinged nonsense he's saying. He's at best a D list celeb. If this was Taylor Swift or Trump sure I'd get it but this dude?
@BlueLightningSky He may be less recognized by younger generations. I remember him from Iron Man and Hustle & Flow. He's D list now, and barely more than D list then. But he's recognizable enough that the uneducated will believe him and point to his celebrity status as if he's credentialed to speak with authority on anything.
He’s totally wrong! He is equating mathematics multiplying with increasing amounts. Multiplication does NOT increase any numbers. It is saying, “This number that number of times is this total number.” There is NO NUMBER that is made larger when you multiply two numbers. The total number you get, using positive whole numbers, is always going to be larger than the first number, UNLESS YOU ARE MULTIPLYING BY ONE because it is saying that there is only 1 of that first number. Multiply in math does not mean a number gets larger. It means you are counting groups! *Does Terrence Howard x 1 = 2? NO! But Terrence Howard says it DOES! Terrence show me where the other Terrence is???*
I get the logic whether it's right or wrong. So lets say you have 1 apple and times it by zero, you would still have that 1 apple... right? 0 x nothing would = 0, but as soon as you say 1 apple, it exists, and you have something regardless of what you times it by so 0 x 1 = 1 because the apple exists. It sounds weird but i can see how someone might come to that conclusion. So, 0 = nothing, 1 = something but the real kicker is how can you have something from nothing??? Therefor something had to already exist 😁
@@republicofcasualsNah, man. An apple times zero is zero. That is to say, if you have one set of zero apples, you have zero apples. Or if you have zero sets of one apple, likewise. That's what is being communicated in 1x0=0.
Terence is clearly mentally I at this point. And as a Black mathematician and physicist and educator it’s sad to see someone this wrong. His biggest issue is doesn’t know what multiplication means so HIS fundamentals are wrong.
Terrence isn't wrong and logically 1x1 could only equal 2. The only way it dosen't. Is that you have to change the language and definitions of Multiplication and Times. Times is plural not singular. Multiplication meaning to multiply. The "X" in the equation means to multiply. It doesn't mean anything else. So, either 1x1=2 or 5x5=5. Which is it? Both logically can't be true.
Bro, multiplication was invented as a way to shorten addition. So instead of saying 1+1+1+1+1=5 multiplication was created to shorten that to 1x5=5 (you have 1, 5 times) so 1x1=1 (you have 1, only once)
@@aawiggins314159 It's not a matter of understanding. It's a matter honesty and language used to describe the function of calculations. 1x1 should be removed from the table. Otherwise is a lie. You could say "1" is a representation of a whole number that can't be divided or multiplied by itself. Once you call it multiplication or say times, plural and not time, singular. You just lied and then you could only say it equals 2.
@@andreroy8141 This is mathematics not a court of law. “Honesty” is not the point. Multiplication as we’re discussing is a definition. And understanding is the ONLY point. Terence (and those like him in their armchair zealotry) do not understand what multiplication means within the context of mathematics a dm it’s very precise about what Al the terms are referring to and their relationship to one another. There’s nothing false about 1 X 1 = 1. This is a TECHNICAL expression and you can’t simply come in and try to redefine things arbitrarily. And you wouldn’t do this in any other field as well.
negative numbers are a government conspiracy. They didnt even exist until modern times. It was invented by the IRS so they can tax money you dont have and put you in dept forever
If he wasn't so fortunate to become rich as an actor, he would be that guy talking gibberish on the street corner instead of on podcasts spewing nonsense.
@@crushinnihilism it's actually not a good argument and it's just verbal slight of hand. In mathematics multiply doesn't mean icrease by that's what addition is. If you increase 5 by 5 that's 10. Multiplication signifies how many sets of that number there are. If you have 5 x 5 for example that means 5 sets of 5 added together which gives you 25. That's why we call it "times" we're saying how much you get when you count 5, 5 times
For all of you defending this guy, if what he is saying is right and the math we are using is wrong, there would be no: Buildings Bridges Computers Phones Eye glasses Cars.... All of human inventions and technology are science based, and math is the language of science. Let that sink in.
Not necessarily if we're all using the same calculations it wouldn't matter think about it as long as we both get the answer 4 it didn't matter how we got to 4 1+1+1+1=4 2+2=4 3+1=3 etc so if they all had the same scale it wouldn't affect the outcome. It's different when you think of it from the perspective of imagining the zeroeth dimension but it was a conceptual thought experiment thing that would not function so IDK it's he crazy I mean we been lied to about a lot this would just be 1 more lie IDK WTF to believe anymore man who knows.
Seeing people like Terrence Howard really makes me value my intelligence. Thank goodness, my parents got together over a mutual respect for each other's minds. The older I get, the more understand how much of an avantage it is to have a rational and reliable mind.
Unfortunately his math doesn't work for me. I tried multiples 1£ but I was always ending up with what I started I wish for once he could demonstrate his stupid beliefs. Not just claiming it
The function is "f(x) = x(x)" if x=1 then "f(1) = 1(1)". Multiplication is a contraction of a factor. If I scale something from 1 along a ratio of 1:1, then you get 1 because you did not change it at all. If I have 1 apple per set (1/1) and I have 1 set of apples, then I have 1 apple. You are not comparing 2 things. You are scaling 1 thing by a factor of the second value. If I have 2 sets where the set is 1 apple per set, then I have 2(1/1) = 2/2=1.
@@heyalun just realized I made that typo lmao. I meant 1x1=1 but I guess my brain was so focused on 1x1=2 that that’s what I wrote. Not gonna fix it tho since it’s pretty funny.
This is the problem with our society. All it takes is for someone to speak with conviction, and people will accept it, no matter how insanely wrong they are.
Terrence is living proof of why we shouldnt give celebrities and actors a voice about ANY important subject. Climate change, other social issues, and math included.
If celebrities are speaking to accepted science and data driven research then have at it. Climate change and evolution are data driven accepted science with irrefutable evidence backing them. But when a celebrity starts saying they’re smarter than the scientists then yammer on about things that a 2nd grader can debunk, it’s time to take the mic away. 1X1= 2… what a complete imbecile.
But you don't believe the scientists on any of that shit either, you prefer to listen to *checks notes* an adulterous reality television show host turned convicted felon
There are intelligent artists and actors. It's actually ignorant to suggest we ignore a person's commentary and opinions on important issues simply because they are entertainers. 🤦♀️
@@LoneRanger-et7gq I guess you are counting Gretta Thunberg in the valid category? With the exception of maybe Reagen name the last celebrity that did anything of value outside of hollywood....*crickets*
@@danbrown3103 terrence is pretending ... he doesnt know ... in real world math works ok, but if you go to quantum world 1 * 1 = 11 ... because string can vibrate in 11 different dimensions ... 1 action 1 string 11 different outcomes ... math even support this ... BUT the way he is explaining is obvious that he read something, doesnt graps the idea and now he is trying to replicate it ... butchering it completely
It's just a simple application to explain METAPHYSICS and not just physics. His application explains occult principles which is hard to put in a mathematical written expression. The tree of life
Tbf we've also been to space with calcs based on Newtonian physics which have since been replaced with better models. Not really the best measuring stick for math
@@sunwukong32 Firstly, you're wrong. Newtonian physics haven't been "replaced", they've been suplemented in extreme areas (atom scale and cosmic scale). Secondly, this man is questioning the basic building blocks of the fucking universe and everything we've ever built, not high level theories.
@@cpthrki5852 firstly, I didn't say anything about Terrance Howard. I said using successful space travel as a measuring stick for accurate math is problematic. If you want to challenge that notion, you'll have to do it without appealing to the incredulity of a claim I never even made. Secondly, in the context of the topic I was discussing, Newtonian physics have been replaced with better models. The first step in space travel is overcoming gravity. Do we still follow the Newtonian view of gravity? No. Do we still use the same equations based on the old model? No. They have been replaced.
@@sunwukong32 it's not problematic because basic operation like multiplication are the building block of any models. Terrence or the guy commenting aren't commenting on high level models.
@@rexenoshi I haven't done a deep dive on the tangential flight. I didn't even know what it was when you wrote it. After looking it up, it looks like 6 hexagons with propellers on the inside attached together. What can this accomplish that is of any tangible value? Does it use lower levels or energy to fly? Has it increased the speed of flight? Has it lowered material costs for flying vehicles?No, no, & no. This is no scientific or engineering value unless it accomplishes something new or creates new scientific knowledge. Don't see how this toy does any one of those things. Also why do you think Terrence Howard lied about having a phd in chemical engineering from SCSU? When you figure that out, then maybe you'll be better at spotting grifters in the future.
@@Kami84 last time I checked Isaac Newton didn’t have a phd yet I bet your dumbass still believes in gravity. Just because he isn’t explaining how his mind works to make it so you understand it doesn’t mean he isn’t a genius. Infact the bulk of people who are, are treated just like how Terrance Howard is being treated. Seen as Crazy people or mad men until our understanding catches up. But aye I’m sure your explanation of hexagon 6 propeller toy explanation of how the movement and the flight works will go down in history.
Whats crazy is i forgot he was even in iron man one lol i legit for some reason always had it in my head that don cheadle was always war machine, he jus fits the role i guess but now that i remember terrance being war machine he also gave a great performance. Dont know how i forgot about that completely lol
Never forget this is the same guy that thought he should be paid an equal amount as the main star Robert Downey Jr, for playing a supporting character 😂. They were wise to ditch his stupid a$$ and get Don Cheadle.
@@PremiumPIus a government authority or license conferring a right or title for a set period, especially the sole right to exclude others from making, using, or selling an invention. "he took out a patent for an improved steam hammer" Do you even understand why patents are important?
@@wolfmand9641 he has zero patens of value and some design patents that's not any invention at all and a couple of real patents that have no use case and are just impractical solutions solving no problem or issue at all.
@@wolfmand9641his parents are worth shit and should be dismissed after ANY analysis, because you can’t patent anything like this, I mean those shapes he „invented” can count as art, and art can’t be patented… so 😂😂😂😂😂
This makes me realize why he’s been labeled “difficult to work with”. This man’s been holding on to the idea that he’s been right about 1x1=2 since the third grade. He’s be a nightmare to argue with about anything.
I genuinely thought that the amount of people that Re THIS STUPID wasn't enough for this guy to get any meaningful support. I was wrong. People are calling him a genius. I should have been a fraudster 😂
5 x 1= the # of times he's been arrested for assaulting women. And everything coming out of Terrance Howard's mouth should be multiplied by B.S. to the infinite power.😂
I was terrible maths until I started to use it in engineering. I love some of Terrences thoughts on the circle of life but 1 x 6 = 6, just as 1 x 32 = 32, just as 1 x 1 = 1 wakey wakey.
Yeah ima go back and study Walter Russell’s work so I just don’t right him off cuz a lot of it did sound good but I struggles to understand the multiplication part like if … A x B = C, and A or B = quantity and the other units of Quantity 1 x 1 = 1. Because there’s only 1 unit with the quantity of 1. Same as 5 x 1 or 1 x 5 = 5. If I have 1 unit or group of 5 or 5 groups of 1 (yet it takes more than 1 individual to qualify as a unit or group) the total quantity is 5. So it really comes down to the definition of Multiplication.
When it comes to positive integers it really is repeated addition. Even with more than one factor it can be taken two factors at a time and rewritten as simple addition, simplifying as you go. In this case 1x1 is clearly 1. Claiming 1x1 = 2 is clearly bonkers. You have one quantity of one value, and the value is 1. The sum of that single value of 1, is 1. Then again, terrence once told rolling stone that we are told the square root of 2 is 2... which of course we are not told that and it isn't that. He just doesn't understand at all.
@Nyxantos-rm2zx you know his material doesnt come from him.. he knows what he is talking about he jus has different views.. but hey i bet you still think neil degrasse tyson knows what he is talking about or professor cuckoo😉
What happens when you pour water on a gremlin. Does it multiply itself? And, can you pour water in thin air and get a gremlin? No Terrence is saying the word multiply should mean when you start with a value greater than 0 and enlarge it. But, words don't govern how numbers work.
@tae2910 yes, 1 TIMES 1 = 1. But what happens when you get a gremlin wet? It multiplies into 9 more gremlins. So, 1 MULTIPLIED 9 times equals 10. Or 1 DIVIDED 9 times equals 10? It's a grammar issue. This is why we don't use grammar to do math. Words can mean multiple things where a number is always the same. Edit: The idea Is that the word multiply is like the word "clone". You can't clone nothing, so you need something to clone/multiply. It's basically compounding interest. We already have formulas for this. Either way someone wants to use the word multiply, we already have a way to use it. Terrence howard is unaware of this. Also, TIMES is just an addition function.
There are those who wish to understand reality and then there are those who wish to control it. This man is the second, and projects his intentions onto logic and reason.
I kind of get what you mean. He's trying to portray, or possibly actually views himself as some sort of master of the universe. Like he's so advanced he's going to show us how basic math is wrong because he had a thought about it one day.
I flipping LOVE this so much. It brings all the crazies to the surface, all the people who refuse to speak but think like this. This is exactly the same as the bear in the forest scenario!!! LOL!!!
When I was in grade school, I remember observing the sheer idiocy of most of my my peers. Only a few of us would "get" lessons and do "well." I imagine most classrooms are like this in inner city "unprivileged" schools (as those I attended). Those "slower" kids are now all grown up and in society.
@@roqbar8764 Lol something about that does sound quite familiar. These are definitely the people who have strong opinions, but absolutely no argument under critique. Have you met gen z? I'm gonna say without a doubt, direct correlation between behavioural trends, society in general, and the advent of social media. I did very poorly in school because I had no one to model success to me or even the baseline standard of participating, rather the opposite our family was about non-participation and reliance, it took time and hard work to re-organize behavioural patterns after I grew up and moved out of home after school. I know people aren't equal when it comes to processing power lol, but that's been hamstrung in this generation by a bottleneck, they're completely brainwashed and dependent on 10 second shorts. Dependant on an ideology that pervades everything, and to them overcomes all rationality. It feels very similar to what i'm seeing in the comments everywhere about the Terrence Howard interview, It's worrying. Part of me wonders if it's not just something, some department somewhere is using to gauge public opinion, like a litmus test to see how malleable the public is, or at least on facebook and social media lol.
@@davidhardy3074 Interesting (especially your last sentence). Thank you for your thoughtful insight. I agree, though contradicting myself, that "social" media is affecting behavioral trends and society. This comment section is a glimpse to those effects.
@@roqbar8764 I fully agree with you mate, it was like that at school for me too. For me, i'm not a team player never have been. Do poorly on teams, and great by myself.
Terrance math is that if you run a lap, then another lap, and multiple the two laps, you get 2 laps It's not wrong. You just can't make your brain go in a different direction than what you already know
@@Justinegallows your logic makes no sense, by Terrance logic if I run one mile, once, then I’ve ran 2 miles in total. If you actually believe that then you are equally ret@rded as him which is clear that you are lol
@@Justinegallows your comment made no sense lol please lay out how else you’d resolve the multiplication equation of how many miles ran based on his formula, lay it out go ahead…
Terrance Howard is not crazy and the calculator is not broke. He just doesn’t understand the fundamentals of mathematical philosophy and that has nothing to do with his intelligence. He a very intelligent person, and like lots of intelligent people he is mostly concerned with his ego. Theoretical science is a continuum and his quest is to be singular and smarter that everyone else greatly impedes his ability to understand these things. He’s unconcerned with contributing to human understanding of reality he’s try to exalt himself above everyone else for his own purposes.
I will agree partially apart from the fact that he is an intelligent person. He is going through a god complex. Have you ŕead his reasoning as to why 1 x 1= 2? It is absolutely laughable. I debunked it in 1 minute. I honestly wonder whether he is doing this for an upcoming role or if he is experiencing a psychotic breakdown. I feel his family should be intervening.
Dudes first problem is that he supposedly “invented” a new mathematics. Math was never invented it was discovered. The physics of nature exists whether we know about them or not. Luckily we do know about them which gave us pretty much everything you see around you. Howard’s “math” so far has produced exactly nothing.
Multiplication isn't an action therefore it doesn't require a reaction. 1x1 = 1 because multiplication is a representation of a value. 12, 6x2 and 3x4 are all the same thing in "different languages"
Ok, if I go up to someone and ask "can I kick you just this one time." Would they get kicked once or twice? That one ask times that one action would equal one kick. Yes or no?
I am in no means saying I agree with Terrence, but if I kick something I would have exerted a force that I generated. Now if I were to kick you, I would also feel pain because a force is being exerted back onto me from your leg. At a molecular level I would think there were 2 “kicks” in your example.
@@daniellepugsley3130okay so if McDonald’s sell a cheeseburger for $1 and you buy 1 cheeseburger and they charge you $2, are you just gonna sit back and accept that?
The fact that no one is just saying he's out of his mind is a huge critique on the education in America or how little people care about the integrity of Terrence...
My calculator and 3rd grade teacher Mr Sumnter says it's 1. 1 times anything is equal to itself...his math anit mathin'...and they hosts trying to be polite
It’s insane how the dude in the video is so fucking stupid but yet so confident in himself I find it amazing cause I’m relatively intelligent but struggle with my confidence even when I know I’m correct. There should be a science deduction to the study of people below average intelligence we need to know why some people just can’t understand basic concepts and how they become that way
you clearly dont understand his point and thats not entirely your fault because very smart people have a problem explaining themselves clearly. essentially he is talking about a mathematical fallacy that presents itself in quantum physics where the idea or concept of 1x1=1 or 1x0=0 breaks down and becomes false. similarly how Newtons law breaks down and becomes false the closer you approach a black hole. it doesn't mean that Newtons law is wrong but it cannot be applied to a black hole. you need to replace it with Einsteins theory in order to solve it. the same can be said for 1x1. as you aproach things at the quantum level, the equation breaks down and is no longer true and therefore must be replaced with something else. thats his point. 1x1 still is 1 when dealing with basic math but the further away from basic math you get, you come to find that it doesn't work. he has successfully brought this up to be audited and they are still discussing this at Oxford as i type this. this is an actual problem in quantum physics. so while we like to joke and be funny calling people stupid and crazy only to find out they were right makes us look foolish.
@@ailuosi7241 I got time today... Condescension may suit you, at the same time I never called him stupid or crazy. Highly intelligent people have a challenge articulating in social constructs not their knowledge. You know it, you can explain it. If he was trying to flex, it failed. Using the claim that 1x1=2 can be proven by entering it in a cell phone calculator is flawed. That math wasn't mathing. I do agree that if he wanted to explain the quantum math approach in a more palatable way a simple "1x1 as we know it works in basic math, however, it becomes false when applied using math in quantum physics" which would have created a mind blown teachable moment 🤯 not a wtf is he on my teacher and calculator is saying this moment🤔🙄.
@@spencer4324 the 1x1=2 comment he made was a reference to something he had said prior to the conversation he is having in the clip. go watch the whole thing. they didn't put in the equation 1x1. he brought that up to make a point about how he knows they heard him say it before and thought he was crazy for saying it. so he was proving a mathematical fallacy by showing a loop through the square root of 2 where he proved that x^3=x+x=2x which is a loop that shouldn't occur. they were laughing and joking until they did it themselves and found out he was correct and then they stopped laughing. this formula in mathematics is completely wrong and yet he just showed them that it actually works yet it shouldn't. again, you failed to understand his point and mine at the same time and i never said you called him stupid and crazy. he literally says it in tbe video that thats what people were saying about him. and if you truly have the time then actually watch the full clip and you will see that they never typed 1x1 into the calculator to get 2. again you just don't get it.
@@ailuosi7241 Either you failed to understand or I'm not clear is that I'm commenting on the short that was shown. I'm not disputing his or your claims that beyond the basic math the equation is a fallacy. I said so. There is no link to the longer version of video nor will I search for it, for that I don't have the time. The creators of the video obviously didn't want to highlight the mind blowing moment or they would have narrated the story differently with added link to proof of the claim. Given the short the math isn't mathing based on the information edited and provided. My calculator and teacher still reflects my aforementioned claims. You're still debating the equation and missing the forest for the trees... I suppose it's that social construct I was talking about earlier.🤷🏾♀️ It's okay to agree to disagree.
@@rhobesauce lol definitely not, they were some real engineers that built it. The look on their faces in the winner anouncemenr video when he started talking about mining asteroids, replacing helicopters, selling to Raytheon and Lockheed Martin etc. was pretty funny though.
It wasn't even written for this project. Ardupilot code simply adopted a new frame design. Won't claim the repurposing was trivial, but is certainly wasn't difficult.
Having one object present is 1. Having two objects present is 2. You cannot multiply those to objects. What you can multiply is the number of people who have that ONE object, or two of those objects, etc. So you end up with the number of those objects. Are present. It is a operation that deals with a number of sets that you have. Not an operation that increase ANYTHING. It is only figuring out what you already have. NOTHING IS INCREASING IN THIS OPERATION. Multiply, as in increasing the amount of something that you have IS ACTUALLY ADDITION. ADDITION increases the amount, where as MULTIPLICATION allows you to figure out how many of those things, or that amount, is ALREADY THERE.
Thank you for this. I’ve been seeing these Terrence Howard videos going viral and I’ve been trying to tell everyone he is trolling. Another thing he tries to claim is that there are no straight lines in nature, but light itself travels along a straight path. Even wave forms which he likes to talk about travel in straight paths even if they are composed of waves. It’s scary how many people in the comments of some of these videos are just gobbling this nonsense up like snake oil.
@@PowerGurhlI also currently don’t comprehend what he’s talking about but before writing him off how about research the patents he created and owns. Then look up which big tech companies are using his patents. Have a wonderful day.
@@IamEsbe i swear the only people i see that believe this nonsense and think that owning 1 single patent of something that isn't even "being used" by a single company are black people. come on guys... Have you looked up his patents? I have. Do you understand anything he's talking about? I do. It's all nonsense. His patent is for a "window" that is a tv screen, that live streams "the bahamas" or some other place to you. So you can change your window view. The patent was rejected many times and companies HAVE TO CITE any patents that are somewhat similar to help prove they are not the same thing... They aren't "using" this patent. Also, patents can be sold. Who knows if he bought patents? Who knows if he paid someone to write patents for his basic idea?
@@nikokaapayou know really has he tho? Every body is claiming what he says is false but he literally created solar inventions to sustain energy from the sun designed models and everything I’m going to be 100 percent honest I think he is Nikolai Tesla incarnate I really do people is calling him crazy but what he’s saying is plausible
@@nikokaapa say what you want but I know something amazing happening when it’s happening I believe this is a rare man a true mad genius whom could literally change everything about the world today
@@DrunkDalty spend your day outside listening to every homeless man on the street babble about things they have no comprehension of, surely if one of those crazy things they say has some truth its worth listening. No, when he has anything to say that has real value we'll listen, but as of now hes a grifter and a charlatan making money off of gullible high ego idiots.
It's easy to appear intelligent in front of idiots.
He’s already patented all this stuff and proved it. It’s easy to sound intelligent when you’re just posting a comment and don’t have any research at all done. I don’t know how you’re typing honestly, when you have one thumb up your ass.
I liked this comment, because you seem super smart!
💯
@@user-oj4lx3sy5geither this is irony or comedy. Either way made me laugh lol
@@MandelaFreemansatire is the word you are looking for.
He’s like the Steven Seagal of math
🤣🤣
😄
😂😂
😂😂
Facts
1x1 is saying you have 1, 1 time which is 1. Please do not swim on the deep end of a shallow pool and call yourself a deep sea diver.
Thank you! Idk why people are entertaining his "theory" that a literal 8 year old learning how to do multiplication in elementary school could disprove 🤣
So by that logic 1x0= what then? Following your logic 1x0 is saying you have 1 multiplied by nothing would that still not be 1?
@@mpkgotbeatz2061 No it would mean that you have zero ones. In other words you don't have anything.
@@mpkgotbeatz2061
You have 1, but zero times. So you don't have 1 because you have it zero times. The first part of a multiplication is a hypothetical, it's an incomplete or unsolvable equation until you get the second part.
@@Will-ts9rl so 0x0
He puts the "mental" in fundamentals
Fun-da-mayne-tals
"Are those my only two options?" 😂😂
I enjoyed that line than all the story 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
That hella sent me 😂
Terrence thinking like "oh shit he's right" then says "or am i right!?!" lmfao
Host was lookin for an out so bad lol
That's what we all ask every presidential election
Imagine being wrong, but totally confident about it
Well then you can join the GOP.
Pretty much every conspiracy theorist out there
@@SkywalkerSamadhiY'all racists just mad that a Black Man be debunking your false math 😂
@@gfys756 i pray to god that this is a joke💀💀
You’ve described every religion in the world. Thanks
I owed Howard some money, and I'm glad he realized that if I give him 50 dollars just once, it actually makes a total of 100 dollars. 🤪
HAAAAAAAAAAA
@@thegroovyhead By reiterating the process with the result, over and over again, any number equals any other number 😂.
They need fo change the equation to just x1 so it doesn't confuse peepo
Like a Mofo
You overpaid. 50x1 is 5,000. He owes you $4,900.
We’re really living in Idiocracy when a person making such claims doesn’t get immediately laughed out the studio.
Especially when the majority go straight to criticism without thorough examination themselves.
@@cristianrivera2966Terrence? Is that you?
@@cristianrivera2966I examined what he said but it was all just word salad that means nothing.
When Terrence looks in the mirror, his reflection asks for an autograph.
He sees 2 people in the mirror, because 1x1 is 2.
@@user-do1sr9wg1wcame here to say exactly this
😅😅😂
😅, and at times he says to himself "damn, I'd let that dude hit it "😂😂😂
😆😆
Terrence Howard is living every kid in schools dream rn saying that the math is wrong not him
🤣 🤣 🤣
Truth 😂😂😂
It is wrong, common sense went out the windows with mathematics.
1x0 can not equal 0 because you still have something there, the "1" 0x0 is 0 1x1 is 2 2x1 is 3 etc you are all wrong and it's actually funny living to man made standards and not looking deeper into what reality puts in front of us.
You can't say 1x2 is 2 but then say 2x2 is 4 it does not make sense and does not work. It has only worked to this day because we belive it works.
@@p3xlastname964 Maths is not physics buddy. It's an abstraction.
This guy is brilliant. He's building a following off the portion of the population that legitimately doesnt understand elementary level math 😂😂😂
The funny thing is his point went right over your head. He’s saying what we learned is wrong. It’s funny to me how instead of actually thinking about what he is saying people just dismiss it. This is what’s wrong with the world today.
@@Spiritualguyyy 1 x1 = _
@@SpiritualguyyyHe just claimed that 1x1=2. Unless that second 1 is a variable that equals 2, the statement is completely wrong. Do you have more context than the rest of us do?
@@Spiritualguyyy1 instance of 1 is 1. You are a fool. 😮
@@colebyrnes7889It’s wrong because they call it multiplication. It should be reworded
What i love more than him is his supporters who actually defend him on all this stuff
They’re so fun to laugh at they’re worse than flat earthers and I didn’t think that was even possible 😂
Terrence Howard is trying to figure out how Chuck Norris counted to infinity twice.
Underrated comment
Terrence Howard doesn't agree with the periodic table of elements and neither does Chuck Norris, because the only element Chuck Norris cares about is the element of surprise.
But Terrence knows precisely how Chuck did it! Chuck has 1 infinity which he multiplies by 1 infinity = 2 infinity.
I don't get it, but if we're going to believe a dude who identifies as a toaster's crumbs then ...
Who the hell is Chuck Norris 😐 That's the first time that question has ever been asked!! 😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 awesome!!!!!
Math was so good he created a sequel
Bars
🤣🤣🤣🤣 underrated comment!!
It's just symbols in 2d form we call numbers and has balance in 3d form and our perspective is the 4d. Hold my 🍺😂
Lol
@@howardblaylock3490are you making this up lmao
You know the education system is fucked when people start debating kindergarten math
Dude I always knew I was a little smarter than most but never realized just how dumb soo many ppl are not even being mean lol
😂😂😂
Idiocracy really became real.
Yeah but what Terrence is arguing is not Kindergarten math it’s more philosophy. It’s more in the realm of how zero wasn’t widely used in math until millennia after basic math was established.
@@Byronic19134nope. He’s arguing math.
My man just turned math into a conspiracy theory....
“Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.” This quote is being proven to be true as we speak
We are all circumstantial idiots, just different subjects....different moments
1x1=2 terrence is a genius. Please read his books
I’m just curious how he thinks it’s 2, ofc everyone is taught 1x1 is 1 but why does he state otherwise ?
He’s a genius holding 97 patents. Take a harder look.
This what ppl used to call Tesla and other genius for challenging conventional science at that time until they proved everyone wrong remember when ppl thought the world was flat and you would fall of the edge of you to too far west ? Then colon did and discovered a new continent everything is relative my brother don’t be a hater
I think Terrence saw 2x2=4 and said, “Multiplication is just addition with a longer name.”😂
Immediately thought of Rick & Morty…
Just addition with extra steps 😂
Nah bro...if we was gonna "match" a blunt then thats a times in this factor and tell me you don't have 2 blunts? 🧐🤣🤣🤣
@@rickyz8531 That's exactly what it is. Multiplication is just repeated addition. 1 x 3 is 1+1+1 (1 three times). What Terrence fails to realize is 1 x 1 is just 1 a single time and not 1+1.
That's actually what multiplication is. 2X3 is 2 added 3 times
😂😂😂
I wonder if he uses the same math when negotiating his movie contracts 😂
🤣🤣🤣
Exactly 😂😂😂
It worked out well for him in Iron Man 2; didn’t it?! 🤪🤪🤪
One dollar one time equals 2 dollars.
Yeah. He was too stupid to do the math on avengers, he released himself from millions and millions of dollars, he was certainly too stupid to see the pot of gold t the end of the rainbow, he and ed norton and eric bana were too stupid to catch a ride on the avengers train.
Calculator works fine, you're crazy. Question answered.
Terrance multiplied walking by walking and invented jogging.
IIRC jogging was discovered when someone tried to walk twice at the same time
😂😂😂😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
he calls walking faster man get it right!!! and thats only bc crawling had already been established and he knew he couldn't get away with another controversy 😂
I mean conceptually you're not far off and the fact nobody here seems to see it is scary. You can not have 1x0 because you can't have absolutely no energy. It's impossible. And the fact that the idea of nothing does exist within our mathematics, makes everything after, infinitely wrong as well. That's literally how simple his concept is. Our multiplication does not fit what our actual reality is, and he's right.
I’m so tired of ignorant people pretending they know more
This is exactly how Qanon started
Said all the stupid people.
@@nielslarsen1693Are you really trying to defend not knowing the difference between multiplication and addition?
@@colebyrnes7889 if you think Terrence says anything but nonsense you dont understand multiplication or addition
Well saying "that's how I invented dltangental math" ego screams validation bc we all know to truly learn and create it's a group affair so who are his teachers and collaborators bc this screams pretentious
"I didn't understand maths, so i invented a whole new system"
You looking at a 5D problem with 3D glasses bruh. NOW LETS TOAST so How bout you go grab you beer & I grab mines which is one times one & we say "CHEERS" to two beers. 🍻 'ALL YA FUNDAMENTALS ARE OFF'
I guess 2 x 1 = 3 then😮@@freindlyghost4829
@@freindlyghost4829 I ain't drinking a beer with you you can't even formulate a coherent sentence. You use improper grammar. Nothing you say has any validty because it's immediately discredited by the simple fact you can't even do something as basic as speak.
@@freindlyghost4829Isn’t that 1+1 and not 1x1? Where is the multiplication in your beer ”story”?
yeah pretty much, dude is insane
If his calculator says 1x1=2 then that calculator is definitely broken🤣🤪🤦♂️
If you cant dazzle them with facts. Baffle them with bullish!t that's Terrance Howard's new acting role
Nah, Fauci broke the simulation . Everything is in question now - especially all the historical “debunking of W. Russell and J. Keely
😂
Good One lmao!!! 🤣
That's how he got his way in to acting in a firts place. He lied on his resumé according to him.
Literal mental illness. I hope he gets help
What's scary is how many people don't know enuf and aren't bright enuf to see it.....
@@ghost9-9ghostreal 😭
That probably isn't happening. He's wealthy and powerful enough to isolate himself.
@@ghost9-9ghostENOUGH
Dude had over 70+ patents that’s global companies use till this day.
He invented a few things, I think you’re just stuck on the internet too much to do some research before you start typing.
Before you reply, go look his shit up.
When you reach celebrity status, there will be some percentage of smooth brained individuals that just believe any nonsense you say.
Bingo
Yeah but "celebrity" is doing some heavy lifting. The only reason you know this dude is because of the unhinged nonsense he's saying. He's at best a D list celeb. If this was Taylor Swift or Trump sure I'd get it but this dude?
@BlueLightningSky He may be less recognized by younger generations. I remember him from Iron Man and Hustle & Flow. He's D list now, and barely more than D list then. But he's recognizable enough that the uneducated will believe him and point to his celebrity status as if he's credentialed to speak with authority on anything.
Loke you in school?
@Alittude In English please.
now I know why they fired him from Iron Man
He’s totally wrong! He is equating mathematics multiplying with increasing amounts. Multiplication does NOT increase any numbers. It is saying, “This number that number of times is this total number.” There is NO NUMBER that is made larger when you multiply two numbers. The total number you get, using positive whole numbers, is always going to be larger than the first number, UNLESS YOU ARE MULTIPLYING BY ONE because it is saying that there is only 1 of that first number. Multiply in math does not mean a number gets larger. It means you are counting groups! *Does Terrence Howard x 1 = 2? NO! But Terrence Howard says it DOES! Terrence show me where the other Terrence is???*
*WHERE IS TERRANCE TIMES TERRANCE???*
I get the logic whether it's right or wrong. So lets say you have 1 apple and times it by zero, you would still have that 1 apple... right? 0 x nothing would = 0, but as soon as you say 1 apple, it exists, and you have something regardless of what you times it by so 0 x 1 = 1 because the apple exists. It sounds weird but i can see how someone might come to that conclusion. So, 0 = nothing, 1 = something but the real kicker is how can you have something from nothing??? Therefor something had to already exist 😁
Commutative property. value × multiplicand = product. Truth-functional propositional logic.
Algebra, etc etc
Calculus, etc etc
Is Terrence a trangender vaccination salesman?
@@republicofcasualsNah, man. An apple times zero is zero. That is to say, if you have one set of zero apples, you have zero apples. Or if you have zero sets of one apple, likewise. That's what is being communicated in 1x0=0.
Terence is clearly mentally I at this point. And as a Black mathematician and physicist and educator it’s sad to see someone this wrong. His biggest issue is doesn’t know what multiplication means so HIS fundamentals are wrong.
Terrence isn't wrong and logically 1x1 could only equal 2. The only way it dosen't. Is that you have to change the language and definitions of Multiplication and Times. Times is plural not singular. Multiplication meaning to multiply. The "X" in the equation means to multiply. It doesn't mean anything else. So, either 1x1=2 or 5x5=5. Which is it? Both logically can't be true.
Bro, multiplication was invented as a way to shorten addition. So instead of saying 1+1+1+1+1=5 multiplication was created to shorten that to 1x5=5 (you have 1, 5 times) so 1x1=1 (you have 1, only once)
@@ricardosmith5753 exactly. Terence seems to not know or understand this.
@@aawiggins314159 It's not a matter of understanding. It's a matter honesty and language used to describe the function of calculations. 1x1 should be removed from the table. Otherwise is a lie. You could say "1" is a representation of a whole number that can't be divided or multiplied by itself. Once you call it multiplication or say times, plural and not time, singular. You just lied and then you could only say it equals 2.
@@andreroy8141 This is mathematics not a court of law. “Honesty” is not the point. Multiplication as we’re discussing is a definition. And understanding is the ONLY point. Terence (and those like him in their armchair zealotry) do not understand what multiplication means within the context of mathematics a dm it’s very precise about what Al the terms are referring to and their relationship to one another. There’s nothing false about 1 X 1 = 1. This is a TECHNICAL expression and you can’t simply come in and try to redefine things arbitrarily. And you wouldn’t do this in any other field as well.
1x1 is 2 ... As a registered nutcase, I approve of this message 👍
😮🤫🤔
😂😂😂
And as a tangential flight technician I approve of both your comments
@@Roger-ck3tu This is a real life example of tangential flight outmaneuvering everyone: watch?v=aX-zSBU4bCs&t=59
negative numbers are a government conspiracy. They didnt even exist until modern times. It was invented by the IRS so they can tax money you dont have and put you in dept forever
Boy, I tell you.....confidence is like a magic trick with the right audience.
That's why they call these people 'conmen', short for confidence men.
He's actually insane. That's it
If he wasn't so fortunate to become rich as an actor, he would be that guy talking gibberish on the street corner instead of on podcasts spewing nonsense.
Nooooo, you’re sane!!!! That’s the problem here…. It’s 2024, get crazy or get left buddy….
lol this is almost reality lol
Certified
@@endxofxeternityever since IronMan 2 pre-production
This is reminding me of 2+2 =5 in george orwell's 1984
To multiply means to increase. That's his argument. So, by definition, to add more to one CANNOT be one. It's actually a good argument.
To multiply means to increase. By definition, to increase 1 by 1 it must be 2.
To multiply means to increase. By definition, to increase 1 by 1 it must be 2.
To multiply means to increase. By definition, to increase 1 by 1 it must be 2.
@@crushinnihilism it's actually not a good argument and it's just verbal slight of hand. In mathematics multiply doesn't mean icrease by that's what addition is. If you increase 5 by 5 that's 10. Multiplication signifies how many sets of that number there are. If you have 5 x 5 for example that means 5 sets of 5 added together which gives you 25. That's why we call it "times" we're saying how much you get when you count 5, 5 times
For all of you defending this guy, if what he is saying is right and the math we are using is wrong, there would be no:
Buildings
Bridges
Computers
Phones
Eye glasses
Cars....
All of human inventions and technology are science based, and math is the language of science.
Let that sink in.
or maybe we’d have better of all those things
Not necessarily if we're all using the same calculations it wouldn't matter think about it as long as we both get the answer 4 it didn't matter how we got to 4 1+1+1+1=4 2+2=4 3+1=3 etc so if they all had the same scale it wouldn't affect the outcome. It's different when you think of it from the perspective of imagining the zeroeth dimension but it was a conceptual thought experiment thing that would not function so IDK it's he crazy I mean we been lied to about a lot this would just be 1 more lie IDK WTF to believe anymore man who knows.
OR
We could have had flying cars decades ago
No he’s not saying the current math that exists doesn’t function in a way that is useful.
Math is the language of the universe, so yea, you can tell he didn’t finish school
Seeing people like Terrence Howard really makes me value my intelligence. Thank goodness, my parents got together over a mutual respect for each other's minds. The older I get, the more understand how much of an avantage it is to have a rational and reliable mind.
That means if I have 1 dollar, I actually have 2 dollars! Holly Shit, I just found infinite money glitch!
😂
Unfortunately his math doesn't work for me.
I tried multiples 1£ but I was always ending up with what I started
I wish for once he could demonstrate his stupid beliefs. Not just claiming it
It’s the “never be broke”hack!
If you have two dollars does that mean you really have 4?
@@jamesringness3702 Yes ì believe it scales
Bro wanted to be polite. "Are those my only two options" 😂
Bad math. That's why Hustle and Flow made $23.5 million, but he only got paid $12,000.
yeah thats not the reason
@@ailuosi7241 Lol. I know....but still.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
he only got paid 12k for that movie??? woooooooow, no way i dont believe that, he KILLED in that role
yooooo this is THE TOP COMMENT
"What does the calculator say?"
"1×1=1"
"SEE IM RIGHT ITS BROKEN"
I like to imagine terrence is doing the biggest drawn out troll humanity has ever seen
about to be!!
Best case scenario
I keep wondering if he's trying to out do joaquin phoenix
@@crai6m4ckwas thinking the same thing. But then again he has been off the rails since Iron Man many years ago…which is why they released him.
don't give him an out.
You're not crazy Howard
You're BATSHIT FUCKING INSANE!!!!
And the calculator is correct
@@matthewdaisley9996 ever heard the saying even a broken clock shows right time twice a day?
@@VishalKjha yes this guys, less correct than that
@@VishalKjha1*1 times a day
@@ooze5752 hah. That was funny.
The function is "f(x) = x(x)" if x=1 then "f(1) = 1(1)". Multiplication is a contraction of a factor. If I scale something from 1 along a ratio of 1:1, then you get 1 because you did not change it at all. If I have 1 apple per set (1/1) and I have 1 set of apples, then I have 1 apple. You are not comparing 2 things. You are scaling 1 thing by a factor of the second value. If I have 2 sets where the set is 1 apple per set, then I have 2(1/1) = 2/2=1.
In simple terms:
Multiplication = Reaction
Don't confuse it with addition. That is why we have both addition & multiplication in math😎
Thanks you! Louder for the people in the back!
The irony that the only people who would actually understand what you wrote or want to spend the time to understand it already know that 1x1=2.
@@jackinzbox.wait what? If you have 1 group of 1 apples you have 2 apples?
@@heyalun just realized I made that typo lmao. I meant 1x1=1 but I guess my brain was so focused on 1x1=2 that that’s what I wrote. Not gonna fix it tho since it’s pretty funny.
This is the problem with our society.
All it takes is for someone to speak with conviction, and people will accept it, no matter how insanely wrong they are.
Terrence is living proof of why we shouldnt give celebrities and actors a voice about ANY important subject. Climate change, other social issues, and math included.
If celebrities are speaking to accepted science and data driven research then have at it. Climate change and evolution are data driven accepted science with irrefutable evidence backing them.
But when a celebrity starts saying they’re smarter than the scientists then yammer on about things that a 2nd grader can debunk, it’s time to take the mic away.
1X1= 2… what a complete imbecile.
But you don't believe the scientists on any of that shit either, you prefer to listen to *checks notes* an adulterous reality television show host turned convicted felon
No, he's proof that we shouldn't give Terrence Howard any credence. You can't make broad generalizations based on specific instances.
There are intelligent artists and actors. It's actually ignorant to suggest we ignore a person's commentary and opinions on important issues simply because they are entertainers. 🤦♀️
@@LoneRanger-et7gq I guess you are counting Gretta Thunberg in the valid category? With the exception of maybe Reagen name the last celebrity that did anything of value outside of hollywood....*crickets*
Love Terrance’s math clips. Reading the comments really does show how stupid a lot of people are.
At first I thought you were serious. Terrence does need a psychiatric intervention.
@@xaviermagnate
Yes he does. I meant that some comments agree with him.
@@danbrown3103 terrence is pretending ... he doesnt know ... in real world math works ok, but if you go to quantum world 1 * 1 = 11 ... because string can vibrate in 11 different dimensions ... 1 action 1 string 11 different outcomes ... math even support this ... BUT the way he is explaining is obvious that he read something, doesnt graps the idea and now he is trying to replicate it ... butchering it completely
@@danbrown3103 just to be clear 1 * 1 = 11 that i explained is oversimplified to the maximum level because math behind this is complex as hell
@@kacmed what
Yeah dude you are smarter than every mathematician that ever lived and everyone who abides to basic multiplication. Freaking mastermind.
If 1*1 = 2 then what is 1*2 equal to?
@@n4jemnik136 well if 1*1=2 you can divide both sides by 1 and get 1=2, meaning 1*2 would be 2*2 so 4. Obviously 1 does not equal 2
the sad thing is fanboys believe this trash
@@n4jemnik136depends, is multiplication being confused for addition? Because that’s what it looks like lol
It's just a simple application to explain METAPHYSICS and not just physics. His application explains occult principles which is hard to put in a mathematical written expression. The tree of life
Neil just clapped Terrence publicly which eases my soul
In my relationship 1x1 ended up being 3 😂 Me, her and our little lad
Mines (currently still) is at 1x2=12 🙂
His point exactly.. It's a universal number
I think that’s what he’s saying , how could it ever be one when your multiplying it? 🤷♂️🤯🤦♂️
Now that is the true science of man 🔥
That's 1 + 1 = 3 😁 😂
Terrance, we have gone to space using the current math system. Please fly a ship with yours
Tbf we've also been to space with calcs based on Newtonian physics which have since been replaced with better models.
Not really the best measuring stick for math
@@sunwukong32 If he can make a shuttle fly with his math, I will believe him.
@@sunwukong32 Firstly, you're wrong. Newtonian physics haven't been "replaced", they've been suplemented in extreme areas (atom scale and cosmic scale). Secondly, this man is questioning the basic building blocks of the fucking universe and everything we've ever built, not high level theories.
@@cpthrki5852 firstly, I didn't say anything about Terrance Howard. I said using successful space travel as a measuring stick for accurate math is problematic. If you want to challenge that notion, you'll have to do it without appealing to the incredulity of a claim I never even made.
Secondly, in the context of the topic I was discussing, Newtonian physics have been replaced with better models. The first step in space travel is overcoming gravity. Do we still follow the Newtonian view of gravity? No. Do we still use the same equations based on the old model? No. They have been replaced.
@@sunwukong32 it's not problematic because basic operation like multiplication are the building block of any models. Terrence or the guy commenting aren't commenting on high level models.
This is actually genius, he's getting the entire country to talk about him over being confidently wrong about the most basic thing imaginable
It's hilarious that he says it with such confidence 😂😂😂
@@Tommy81.519 … because he knows the work of Sean M. Carroll , you don’t
Society is f’d when a fair number of people can’t call out obvious uneducated drivel.
Explain how tangential flight works then please break it down for me.
@@rexenoshi I haven't done a deep dive on the tangential flight. I didn't even know what it was when you wrote it. After looking it up, it looks like 6 hexagons with propellers on the inside attached together. What can this accomplish that is of any tangible value? Does it use lower levels or energy to fly? Has it increased the speed of flight? Has it lowered material costs for flying vehicles?No, no, & no. This is no scientific or engineering value unless it accomplishes something new or creates new scientific knowledge. Don't see how this toy does any one of those things. Also why do you think Terrence Howard lied about having a phd in chemical engineering from SCSU? When you figure that out, then maybe you'll be better at spotting grifters in the future.
@@Kami84 last time I checked Isaac Newton didn’t have a phd yet I bet your dumbass still believes in gravity. Just because he isn’t explaining how his mind works to make it so you understand it doesn’t mean he isn’t a genius. Infact the bulk of people who are, are treated just like how Terrance Howard is being treated. Seen as Crazy people or mad men until our understanding catches up. But aye I’m sure your explanation of hexagon 6 propeller toy explanation of how the movement and the flight works will go down in history.
@@rexenoshi Tangential flight is a buzzword with no meaning to it.
@@rexenoshi just out of curiosity, who are you voting for this November? If at all.
Dude went nuts when Don Cheadle became war machine
Whats crazy is i forgot he was even in iron man one lol i legit for some reason always had it in my head that don cheadle was always war machine, he jus fits the role i guess but now that i remember terrance being war machine he also gave a great performance. Dont know how i forgot about that completely lol
1 x 1 war machines = Don Cheadle
Shia labeouf'd
Thats the truth.
That’s exactly my theory
The moment he was dropped from iron man 2 his brain broke
I hope airplanes don't find out that the math that keeps them in the sky has been wrong this whole time!
Never forget this is the same guy that thought he should be paid an equal amount as the main star Robert Downey Jr, for playing a supporting character 😂. They were wise to ditch his stupid a$$ and get Don Cheadle.
If you don't speak up who will
@@comment5398what you speak has to make some sense
@@9ine-fd6zc ok bot
@@comment5398 i stand by my first statement🤚
@@9ine-fd6zc ok bot
Tangential math? Oh he's on a tangent alright
“That’s how I invented tangential flight”
*proceeds to not invent anything*
Lol, you don’t know about all his patents?
@@wolfmand9641tell us you don’t understand patents without saying it. 😂
@@PremiumPIus a government authority or license conferring a right or title for a set period, especially the sole right to exclude others from making, using, or selling an invention.
"he took out a patent for an improved steam hammer"
Do you even understand why patents are important?
@@wolfmand9641 he has zero patens of value and some design patents that's not any invention at all and a couple of real patents that have no use case and are just impractical solutions solving no problem or issue at all.
@@wolfmand9641his parents are worth shit and should be dismissed after ANY analysis, because you can’t patent anything like this, I mean those shapes he „invented” can count as art, and art can’t be patented… so 😂😂😂😂😂
Marvel clearly made the right choice going with Don Cheadle
His face of confidence in the beginning with the pause of silence got me weak 😂
Lmao
This is a man who took a high dive in a low well.
First heard this in the Hateful Eight! 👌🏿
you jumped in a gas tank witcha butt cheeks on fire 🔥
go drink from the gas ⛽️ pump and light a cigarette 🚬
This makes me realize why he’s been labeled “difficult to work with”. This man’s been holding on to the idea that he’s been right about 1x1=2 since the third grade. He’s be a nightmare to argue with about anything.
Its hard out here for a pimp
I genuinely thought that the amount of people that Re THIS STUPID wasn't enough for this guy to get any meaningful support.
I was wrong. People are calling him a genius.
I should have been a fraudster 😂
It’s hard out here for a simp
5 x 1= the # of times he's been arrested for assaulting women. And everything coming out of Terrance Howard's mouth should be multiplied by B.S. to the infinite power.😂
So he's been arrested 10 times? Whose math are you using here?
@@PeteC62 are you terrance howard? 5x1. Google it.
I was terrible maths until I started to use it in engineering. I love some of Terrences thoughts on the circle of life but 1 x 6 = 6, just as 1 x 32 = 32, just as 1 x 1 = 1 wakey wakey.
His ideas on multiplication discredit everything else
The other ideas aren’t even his, they are Walter Russell. Read the Universal One if you are into it.
@@bertkilborne6464 just bc he is wrong on one thing doesn't mean his other thoughts or theories are wrong. Einstein just wasn't right on every theory
Yeah ima go back and study Walter Russell’s work so I just don’t right him off cuz a lot of it did sound good but I struggles to understand the multiplication part like if …
A x B = C, and A or B = quantity and the other units of Quantity 1 x 1 = 1. Because there’s only 1 unit with the quantity of 1. Same as 5 x 1 or 1 x 5 = 5. If I have 1 unit or group of 5 or 5 groups of 1 (yet it takes more than 1 individual to qualify as a unit or group) the total quantity is 5. So it really comes down to the definition of Multiplication.
@@MeisterShowtimeOne guy is Einstein. The other is this idiot... Just saying
Your 100% crazy Terrence 😆
N.Tyson summed it up pretty polite by mentioning the Dunning-Kruger effect
And N Tyson is just as much a reticulated twit. 😅
Problem here is that multiplication is not defined correctly. Many define it repeated addition of a number to itself. That's the problem.
When it comes to positive integers it really is repeated addition. Even with more than one factor it can be taken two factors at a time and rewritten as simple addition, simplifying as you go.
In this case 1x1 is clearly 1. Claiming 1x1 = 2 is clearly bonkers. You have one quantity of one value, and the value is 1. The sum of that single value of 1, is 1.
Then again, terrence once told rolling stone that we are told the square root of 2 is 2... which of course we are not told that and it isn't that. He just doesn't understand at all.
Great point
In what way is it a problem?
@Nyxantos-rm2zx you know his material doesnt come from him.. he knows what he is talking about he jus has different views.. but hey i bet you still think neil degrasse tyson knows what he is talking about or professor cuckoo😉
Even by that definition, the number 1 repeated once still equals 1 😅
My guy, if 1 person got 1 cake, then 1x1 =1. I don't see the contradiction at all with 1x1=1
What happens when you pour water on a gremlin. Does it multiply itself?
And, can you pour water in thin air and get a gremlin? No
Terrence is saying the word multiply should mean when you start with a value greater than 0 and enlarge it.
But, words don't govern how numbers work.
Exactly...1×1=1....its the same as saying it...wuts 1 ...1 time...its 1 lol
@tae2910 yes, 1 TIMES 1 = 1.
But what happens when you get a gremlin wet? It multiplies into 9 more gremlins. So, 1 MULTIPLIED 9 times equals 10. Or 1 DIVIDED 9 times equals 10?
It's a grammar issue. This is why we don't use grammar to do math. Words can mean multiple things where a number is always the same.
Edit: The idea Is that the word multiply is like the word "clone". You can't clone nothing, so you need something to clone/multiply.
It's basically compounding interest. We already have formulas for this. Either way someone wants to use the word multiply, we already have a way to use it.
Terrence howard is unaware of this.
Also, TIMES is just an addition function.
@@DrSpoculusSomeone should let him know before he makes an ass out of himself. 😂
Damn you need one of dem professionals @@DrSpoculus
There are those who wish to understand reality and then there are those who wish to control it. This man is the second, and projects his intentions onto logic and reason.
I kind of get what you mean. He's trying to portray, or possibly actually views himself as some sort of master of the universe. Like he's so advanced he's going to show us how basic math is wrong because he had a thought about it one day.
Gay
I miss the time when crazy people were treated like crazy people.
I flipping LOVE this so much. It brings all the crazies to the surface, all the people who refuse to speak but think like this. This is exactly the same as the bear in the forest scenario!!! LOL!!!
When I was in grade school, I remember observing the sheer idiocy of most of my my peers. Only a few of us would "get" lessons and do "well." I imagine most classrooms are like this in inner city "unprivileged" schools (as those I attended). Those "slower" kids are now all grown up and in society.
@@roqbar8764 Lol something about that does sound quite familiar. These are definitely the people who have strong opinions, but absolutely no argument under critique. Have you met gen z? I'm gonna say without a doubt, direct correlation between behavioural trends, society in general, and the advent of social media. I did very poorly in school because I had no one to model success to me or even the baseline standard of participating, rather the opposite our family was about non-participation and reliance, it took time and hard work to re-organize behavioural patterns after I grew up and moved out of home after school. I know people aren't equal when it comes to processing power lol, but that's been hamstrung in this generation by a bottleneck, they're completely brainwashed and dependent on 10 second shorts. Dependant on an ideology that pervades everything, and to them overcomes all rationality. It feels very similar to what i'm seeing in the comments everywhere about the Terrence Howard interview, It's worrying. Part of me wonders if it's not just something, some department somewhere is using to gauge public opinion, like a litmus test to see how malleable the public is, or at least on facebook and social media lol.
@@davidhardy3074 Interesting (especially your last sentence). Thank you for your thoughtful insight. I agree, though contradicting myself, that "social" media is affecting behavioral trends and society. This comment section is a glimpse to those effects.
@@roqbar8764 I fully agree with you mate, it was like that at school for me too. For me, i'm not a team player never have been. Do poorly on teams, and great by myself.
if you see me in a fight wit a bear, dont help me, help the bear
I appreciate terrance for making me feel smart. Thank you!
He’s making good comedy I can’t deny
Is it?
Nobody has the guts to call him out and ridicule him to his face.
Yeah we feel kinda sorry for him 😅
Neil deGrasse Tyson did! Look up his peer review. It is magnificent and be did it in a gentlemanly and scholarly way 😂😂
@@cdub3019 Professor Dave went harder.
@@riquelsonalcochete6070 they both did what needed to be done 🤣
That Oscar from hustle and flow broke his brain
He didn't get an Oscar. He was nominated for it, but didn't win it.
*nomination. He didn't win. Philip Seymour Hoffman won for Capote that year
Childhood trauma, and cocaine, broke his brain.
I would've just called him flat out crazy 😂
I love Terrance’s math, now whenever I run one mile once, I’ll just say I ran 2 miles because now 1x1=2
Terrance math is that if you run a lap, then another lap, and multiple the two laps, you get 2 laps
It's not wrong. You just can't make your brain go in a different direction than what you already know
But you didn't run a mile beforehand.. his point flew over your head.
@@Justinegallows your logic makes no sense, by Terrance logic if I run one mile, once, then I’ve ran 2 miles in total. If you actually believe that then you are equally ret@rded as him which is clear that you are lol
@@julius7949 what are you even talking about, lol it’s simple math, one mile ran once is one mile total, you must be smoking something strong lol
@@Justinegallows your comment made no sense lol please lay out how else you’d resolve the multiplication equation of how many miles ran based on his formula, lay it out go ahead…
Terrance Howard is not crazy and the calculator is not broke. He just doesn’t understand the fundamentals of mathematical philosophy and that has nothing to do with his intelligence. He a very intelligent person, and like lots of intelligent people he is mostly concerned with his ego. Theoretical science is a continuum and his quest is to be singular and smarter that everyone else greatly impedes his ability to understand these things. He’s unconcerned with contributing to human understanding of reality he’s try to exalt himself above everyone else for his own purposes.
Nah, he crazy 😂
I will agree partially apart from the fact that he is an intelligent person. He is going through a god complex. Have you ŕead his reasoning as to why 1 x 1= 2? It is absolutely laughable. I debunked it in 1 minute. I honestly wonder whether he is doing this for an upcoming role or if he is experiencing a psychotic breakdown. I feel his family should be intervening.
I need his weed mayne number cause he fried
Yall ain't gon get it til 50 years from now😂
Im him lol
on 🔥 mane
Won ate hunnit to fo fo selm five ate five. I believe that's the number
@@alexcollins3086 tre won sick fih nan oh to. free raps.
Dudes first problem is that he supposedly “invented” a new mathematics. Math was never invented it was discovered. The physics of nature exists whether we know about them or not. Luckily we do know about them which gave us pretty much everything you see around you. Howard’s “math” so far has produced exactly nothing.
arguable. very interesting topic though
Multiplication isn't an action therefore it doesn't require a reaction. 1x1 = 1 because multiplication is a representation of a value. 12, 6x2 and 3x4 are all the same thing in "different languages"
"Am I crazy, or is the calculator broke?" That's an easy one, Terrence...
Ok, if I go up to someone and ask "can I kick you just this one time." Would they get kicked once or twice? That one ask times that one action would equal one kick. Yes or no?
Excellent example
I am in no means saying I agree with Terrence, but if I kick something I would have exerted a force that I generated. Now if I were to kick you, I would also feel pain because a force is being exerted back onto me from your leg. At a molecular level I would think there were 2 “kicks” in your example.
@@daniellepugsley3130 this is a fundamental misunderstanding of this guy's example, and of multiplication. You are overcomplicating this
1 times the 1 time he's already been kicked in the nuts or 1 times 0 ?
@@daniellepugsley3130okay so if McDonald’s sell a cheeseburger for $1 and you buy 1 cheeseburger and they charge you $2, are you just gonna sit back and accept that?
Just did the math on a calculator. 1x1=1. Now can we stfu about that 😂
He's saying it's broken!
That's why he's saying someone programmed that lie in there. We been lied to, 1x1=2, black holes don't exist, and gravity isn't real! 🤪
@@roqbar8764but it works in every situation it’s used for, nothing we use multiplication for would work if the math was broken 😂
take 1÷1= ? how is that?
and take 1÷0=?
He’s acting like me on LSD. The only difference is I eventually sober up
The fact that no one is just saying he's out of his mind is a huge critique on the education in America or how little people care about the integrity of Terrence...
He is the embodiment of the exact opposite of "why say lot word when few word do trick?"
My calculator and 3rd grade teacher Mr Sumnter says it's 1. 1 times anything is equal to itself...his math anit mathin'...and they hosts trying to be polite
It’s insane how the dude in the video is so fucking stupid but yet so confident in himself I find it amazing cause I’m relatively intelligent but struggle with my confidence even when I know I’m correct. There should be a science deduction to the study of people below average intelligence we need to know why some people just can’t understand basic concepts and how they become that way
you clearly dont understand his point and thats not entirely your fault because very smart people have a problem explaining themselves clearly. essentially he is talking about a mathematical fallacy that presents itself in quantum physics where the idea or concept of 1x1=1 or 1x0=0 breaks down and becomes false. similarly how Newtons law breaks down and becomes false the closer you approach a black hole. it doesn't mean that Newtons law is wrong but it cannot be applied to a black hole. you need to replace it with Einsteins theory in order to solve it. the same can be said for 1x1. as you aproach things at the quantum level, the equation breaks down and is no longer true and therefore must be replaced with something else. thats his point. 1x1 still is 1 when dealing with basic math but the further away from basic math you get, you come to find that it doesn't work. he has successfully brought this up to be audited and they are still discussing this at Oxford as i type this. this is an actual problem in quantum physics. so while we like to joke and be funny calling people stupid and crazy only to find out they were right makes us look foolish.
@@ailuosi7241 I got time today... Condescension may suit you, at the same time I never called him stupid or crazy. Highly intelligent people have a challenge articulating in social constructs not their knowledge. You know it, you can explain it. If he was trying to flex, it failed. Using the claim that 1x1=2 can be proven by entering it in a cell phone calculator is flawed. That math wasn't mathing. I do agree that if he wanted to explain the quantum math approach in a more palatable way a simple "1x1 as we know it works in basic math, however, it becomes false when applied using math in quantum physics" which would have created a mind blown teachable moment 🤯 not a wtf is he on my teacher and calculator is saying this moment🤔🙄.
@@spencer4324 the 1x1=2 comment he made was a reference to something he had said prior to the conversation he is having in the clip. go watch the whole thing. they didn't put in the equation 1x1. he brought that up to make a point about how he knows they heard him say it before and thought he was crazy for saying it. so he was proving a mathematical fallacy by showing a loop through the square root of 2 where he proved that x^3=x+x=2x which is a loop that shouldn't occur. they were laughing and joking until they did it themselves and found out he was correct and then they stopped laughing. this formula in mathematics is completely wrong and yet he just showed them that it actually works yet it shouldn't. again, you failed to understand his point and mine at the same time and i never said you called him stupid and crazy. he literally says it in tbe video that thats what people were saying about him. and if you truly have the time then actually watch the full clip and you will see that they never typed 1x1 into the calculator to get 2. again you just don't get it.
@@ailuosi7241 Either you failed to understand or I'm not clear is that I'm commenting on the short that was shown. I'm not disputing his or your claims that beyond the basic math the equation is a fallacy. I said so. There is no link to the longer version of video nor will I search for it, for that I don't have the time. The creators of the video obviously didn't want to highlight the mind blowing moment or they would have narrated the story differently with added link to proof of the claim. Given the short the math isn't mathing based on the information edited and provided. My calculator and teacher still reflects my aforementioned claims. You're still debating the equation and missing the forest for the trees... I suppose it's that social construct I was talking about earlier.🤷🏾♀️ It's okay to agree to disagree.
To say 1x1 can equal 2, somebody needs to ask him what he thinks 1x2 or 2x1 is then.
He carries the 1 . That would be 3 in his world
Yes he would say 3 😃
3 and 4
Or ask him if he is a flattard.
@@Slycoopbruh thinks multiplication is just addition
So he starred in 1 Iron Man movie, 1 time. But now demands to be paid for doing 2 movies.
Education is important guys 😂😂😂
Yes not every education tells the truth some of it are lies
I think realizing nothing is true always is more important
@@justinkurtrivera2315yeah like cults
@wuneyeproduction education is definitely important I never knew Christopher Columbus discovered America 🤭🤥
@@staydiligent7325😂😂😂
that flying machine is fucking cool not going to lie
You mean the one he crowd sourced from the FPV drone community through a 25k competition and was salty af because it was open source lol
@@thirtythreeeyes8624 wow.... Thanks for sharing that info.
I bet their cad programs used 1*1=1
@@rhobesauce lol definitely not, they were some real engineers that built it. The look on their faces in the winner anouncemenr video when he started talking about mining asteroids, replacing helicopters, selling to Raytheon and Lockheed Martin etc. was pretty funny though.
It wasn't even written for this project. Ardupilot code simply adopted a new frame design. Won't claim the repurposing was trivial, but is certainly wasn't difficult.
“Never get into an argument with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to distinguish which is which.”
Having one object present is 1. Having two objects present is 2. You cannot multiply those to objects. What you can multiply is the number of people who have that ONE object, or two of those objects, etc. So you end up with the number of those objects. Are present. It is a operation that deals with a number of sets that you have. Not an operation that increase ANYTHING. It is only figuring out what you already have. NOTHING IS INCREASING IN THIS OPERATION. Multiply, as in increasing the amount of something that you have IS ACTUALLY ADDITION. ADDITION increases the amount, where as MULTIPLICATION allows you to figure out how many of those things, or that amount, is ALREADY THERE.
Thank you for this. I’ve been seeing these Terrence Howard videos going viral and I’ve been trying to tell everyone he is trolling. Another thing he tries to claim is that there are no straight lines in nature, but light itself travels along a straight path. Even wave forms which he likes to talk about travel in straight paths even if they are composed of waves. It’s scary how many people in the comments of some of these videos are just gobbling this nonsense up like snake oil.
He is not trolling though he really whacky 😅
He is wrong but he whole heartedly believes he is a genius
@@PowerGurhlI also currently don’t comprehend what he’s talking about but before writing him off how about research the patents he created and owns. Then look up which big tech companies are using his patents. Have a wonderful day.
@@IamEsbe i swear the only people i see that believe this nonsense and think that owning 1 single patent of something that isn't even "being used" by a single company are black people. come on guys...
Have you looked up his patents? I have.
Do you understand anything he's talking about? I do.
It's all nonsense. His patent is for a "window" that is a tv screen, that live streams "the bahamas" or some other place to you. So you can change your window view. The patent was rejected many times and companies HAVE TO CITE any patents that are somewhat similar to help prove they are not the same thing... They aren't "using" this patent.
Also, patents can be sold. Who knows if he bought patents? Who knows if he paid someone to write patents for his basic idea?
Light has a slight curve over distance, actually, due to electromagnetism of the ether and earth forces.
Bro found a loop equation and thought the math was wrong 💀
This man has lost his marbles
has he?
@@antpain1156 has he?
@@nikokaapayou know really has he tho? Every body is claiming what he says is false but he literally created solar inventions to sustain energy from the sun designed models and everything I’m going to be 100 percent honest I think he is Nikolai Tesla incarnate I really do people is calling him crazy but what he’s saying is plausible
@@Topple362 The man thinks he has created a new number. The man has definitely lost at least a big portion of his precious marbles.
@@nikokaapa say what you want but I know something amazing happening when it’s happening I believe this is a rare man a true mad genius whom could literally change everything about the world today
You can calculate 1x1 on a graph with an x and y axis. 1x1 is 1^2 or 1 square.
1×1 means that you have 1 only 1 time. 1 is the obvious answer
He’s trying to redefine math not adhere to it, ofc everyone knows 1x1 is 1 in mathematics but he’s saying the definitions of multiplication are wrong
@@DrunkDalty I'll use the same excuse the next time I get an answer wrong on a test. Thanks.
@@DrunkDalty he can say whatever he wants, doesnt make it right
@@Ayan0kojiu right but even if one of those crazy things he’s saying has some truth it was worth saying
@@DrunkDalty spend your day outside listening to every homeless man on the street babble about things they have no comprehension of, surely if one of those crazy things they say has some truth its worth listening. No, when he has anything to say that has real value we'll listen, but as of now hes a grifter and a charlatan making money off of gullible high ego idiots.
He infiltrated Tony Stark headquarters for sure LoL
😹
got high and forgot it was a booby trap from stark hhahahahahahha
true story. new character unlocked.