Elizabeth Street Garden in Little Italy told it must close in 2 weeks

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 жов 2024
  • The beloved Elizabeth Street Garden in Little Italy has been told it must close in two weeks as the city prepares to use the space for affordable housing, but some say the fight isn't over yet. CBS News New York's Naveen Dhaliwal has the story.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 68

  • @scarlotraven6193
    @scarlotraven6193 15 годин тому +26

    New York just keeps getting more and more depressing.

  • @lizabetx483
    @lizabetx483 4 години тому +5

    High density housing without green spaces is like living in a sardine can.

    • @BritainRitten
      @BritainRitten 2 години тому

      And this isn't that. THE GARDEN IS STAYING THERE. They are not just paving it over to build housing. There will still be the park there, they merely close it to the public while they build housing immediately next to it. This guarantees more people can actually use the park in the long term.

    • @RichManhattanite11
      @RichManhattanite11 2 години тому

      We don’t want affordable housing in NYC keep it in statan island or Jersey ❤❤❤ Jeffrey Epstein we want more parks! ❤❤❤

  • @helloalgorythm
    @helloalgorythm 14 годин тому +16

    Its the peoples garden! It belongs to us!

    • @BritainRitten
      @BritainRitten 5 годин тому +1

      You really don't know the history of this Garden. It is currently private and was closed to the public for decades - only recently and temporarily becoming open to the public in a cynical move, and then to be closed to the public.
      Instead, the new move will keep most of the garden AND make it public AND make hundreds of much needed housing units. It's win-win-win.

    • @RichManhattanite11
      @RichManhattanite11 2 години тому

      Chain yourselves to the garden! We don’t want affordable housing! We want more parks!

  • @LoriDunbar-on9nl
    @LoriDunbar-on9nl 10 годин тому +10

    What is ridiculous ?Affordable housing? The rents are not Affordable. They built some buildings in the Bronx. One right next door to me. Two years ago, it is still empty. The one across the street. It's still empty. So, the mayor needs t o take inventory as to what is going on in this city. No he's to busy dealing with his legal problems. There are more examples to many to mention.....

    • @tattoomesam
      @tattoomesam 10 годин тому +4

      Same here there’s a building that was built 10 years ago for battered women. It’s completely empty and undergoing renovation. But thing is it’s only 10 years old. I looked in the dumpster the doors and windows were all still in good condition.

  • @eb1042
    @eb1042 10 годин тому +4

    FOR SENIORS.... WHAT ABOUT THE REST OF US???

    • @BritainRitten
      @BritainRitten 5 годин тому

      More new housing built for seniors, the more existing housing for everyone else. This is a simple fact.
      If you don't build fancy billionaire high-rises, then they bid with you for YOUR apartment. And I promise you, they win.
      More housing being built means we don't bid against eachother as much, causing more housing options for everyone and in turn lowering rents. Yes rents do lower, just see Aukland and Austin and Tokyo and Minneapolis.

  • @Waltaere
    @Waltaere 15 годин тому +17

    Long live the Garden 🙏

    • @BritainRitten
      @BritainRitten 3 години тому +1

      And it will live - with more housing next to it. The proposal doesn't destroy the garden, just allow housing nearby. That's all the fight is over: people not wanting new neighbors.

    • @Waltaere
      @Waltaere 3 години тому

      @@BritainRitten Ohs 🫢.. okays 🤗

  • @rajmathew6220
    @rajmathew6220 15 годин тому +17

    Why not just build the housing somewhere else

    • @BlimpCityFeeder
      @BlimpCityFeeder 14 годин тому

      Like Bensonhurst where the City Councilwoman literally bit the NYPD Lieutenant on 86th St?

    • @daeshawngordon
      @daeshawngordon 12 годин тому +5

      Or use the vacant housing they currently have 😢

    • @tillettman
      @tillettman 8 годин тому +1

      @@daeshawngordonOr rehabilitate the office space that has been vacant since the pandemic. I’m tired of hearing those “poor landlords” in midtown complaining that their buildings are empty when the solution is right there in front of them.

    • @BritainRitten
      @BritainRitten 5 годин тому

      Everyone "somewhere else" also complains about "but why here??", causing nothing to be built anywhere. This is exactly the primary cause for the housing crisis in the first place.
      More importantly, they are making the garden public, with housing build up beside it. Right now it is a completely private park which they recently made public to pretend it was public in the first place.

    • @hermesmcclintok
      @hermesmcclintok 3 години тому

      Have you not noticed that there's something about all people that make them want to rain on other peoples parades? That's why.

  • @paranoidhumanoid
    @paranoidhumanoid 9 годин тому +4

    This is a disgrace.

    • @BritainRitten
      @BritainRitten 5 годин тому

      Not at all, this is an improvement. Most of the garden is being kept AND there will be hundreds of housing units AND the garden is being made permanently public. Cuz right now it's private and only recently been made open to the public in a cynical move - it would close to the public again otherwise, as soon as the the proposed housing is rejected. Thankfully this wasn't rejected.

  • @HughCorbyCruick
    @HughCorbyCruick 5 годин тому +3

    Real estate developers get what they want in New York City. Period.

    • @BritainRitten
      @BritainRitten 5 годин тому

      How about focusing on the important question:
      What's good for the tenant?
      Answer: More housing being built.
      This increases options for tenants, and competition for landlords, causing landlords to lower rents more than they otherwise would.
      If builders make a profit off of serving a need, then who cares? I'd rather be against landlords who profit off of desperation of the tenants, compared to builders who make a good that people desire.

  • @d.akhtar9080
    @d.akhtar9080 4 години тому +2

    They’re not going to make anything affordable

    • @BritainRitten
      @BritainRitten 2 години тому

      The only way housing become affordable is to build more of it, which is exactly what's being proposed here.

  • @blueorangeblossom
    @blueorangeblossom 2 години тому

    This is wrong

  • @stevec404
    @stevec404 4 години тому +1

    "Progress" should never destroy the current good.

    • @BritainRitten
      @BritainRitten 2 години тому

      And it's not being destroyed. The garden is staying where it is, it's merely being closed temporarily to build housing next door.

  • @sollunaystars
    @sollunaystars 8 годин тому +2

    This is wrong!

    • @BritainRitten
      @BritainRitten 5 годин тому

      Not remotely. You get a park back after they build the much needed housing. And it'll be public this time, not just private (which was only recently opened up and would likely close up again)

  • @VesPitts-c3p
    @VesPitts-c3p 3 години тому

    There are plenty of place they can build affordable house. If this mayor and his cronies want another slap at how he is running this city he better think about what he is doing if he gets rid of this garden.

  • @Lee-yc1if
    @Lee-yc1if 2 години тому +1

    Wonder how much the mayor got paid for this. Maybe Robert de Niro can buy it.And If only there was an federally listed endangered butterfly or snail found their. Also whats next Central Park ?

    • @BritainRitten
      @BritainRitten 2 години тому

      The garden isn't being destroyed, just closed temporarily for construction of much needed housing nearby. More people will get access to the park after the housing is built (currently the garden is private and often excluded from the public anyway)

    • @Lee-yc1if
      @Lee-yc1if 2 години тому

      @@BritainRitten they are bulldozing the park and then re-landscape it's in the architectures plans. There's an abandoned skyscraper at the South Street Port that would be easier to renovate and hold more people for less cost. You can even see the the re landscaped image in this report

  • @jimmcd1101
    @jimmcd1101 6 годин тому

    If you don't understand that the landlords will always win in NYC, you haven't been paying attention

    • @BritainRitten
      @BritainRitten 5 годин тому

      Most existing landlords oppose new housing being built in their area, because it reduced the rental prices they can demand in the market. Existing landlords oppose new landlords competing with them. This is exactly why it's important to do the opposite of what they want and make tons of housing with tons of landlords so they have to fight for TENANTS, rather than the other way around.
      Sound like fiction? This literally is happening right now in Austin TX, where landlords are offering lower rents to existing tenants to keep them from going to some of the brand new housing built in the last few years.

  • @parrotcracker6629
    @parrotcracker6629 9 годин тому

    If they must build more affordable housing then incorporate the garden into the building. Rooftop gardens or balconies.

    • @BritainRitten
      @BritainRitten 5 годин тому

      They are already doing that. This is often missed about this story: THEY ARE KEEPING THE GARDEN, just closing it temporarily.
      Indeed, the current park is completely private and would close up again as it had been before. The new park will be public - plus people will have more much needed housing.

  • @petegurdal1844
    @petegurdal1844 4 години тому

    Don't they have 100,000 empty dwellings in NYC?

    • @BritainRitten
      @BritainRitten 2 години тому

      No. Rental vacancy is at an all-time low of 1.4%. We need far more housing than we currently have.
      (btw, even if true, 100k in a city of 9 MILLION is 1.1%. It's nothing.)

  • @Lacycsgo
    @Lacycsgo 13 годин тому +1

    these people forget where they chose to live lol
    parking lot garden < over 100 homes

    • @BritainRitten
      @BritainRitten 5 годин тому +1

      Exactly. AND they are making the park public instead of it currently being private.

  • @ajporter7487
    @ajporter7487 5 годин тому

    Need to put the migrants some where.
    These people protesting are awful.
    After all you voted for it.

  • @nolf1025
    @nolf1025 3 години тому

    Give me a break, there’s plenty of other options, many vacant properties in the outer boroughs

  • @drod3434
    @drod3434 4 години тому

    Liberal Civil War😂😂

  • @bigbilly7865
    @bigbilly7865 10 годин тому +2

    CURTIS SLIWA
    FOR MAYOR 🇺🇲🇺🇲

    • @sollunaystars
      @sollunaystars 8 годин тому

      Be serious

    • @BritainRitten
      @BritainRitten 5 годин тому

      Heck no. As bad as Adams and other NYC Mayors have been, he will be worse.

  • @christopherstone6962
    @christopherstone6962 12 годин тому +3

    Destroying that beautiful garden for a bunch of homeless junkies! Residents should hound the hell out of whoever decided that

    • @BritainRitten
      @BritainRitten 5 годин тому +1

      You don't know what you're talking about. The park will NOT be destroyed, just closed temporarily for construction nearby. The park is private right now and would otherwise close up again as it had been before this charade. Now they are building housing AND reopening the park for all to enjoy.

  • @Scandless-j4n
    @Scandless-j4n 14 годин тому +3

    Good who cares 🤷

    • @jtee4865
      @jtee4865 10 годин тому +2

      Go trip into a sinkhole.

  • @phatalleycat
    @phatalleycat 12 годин тому

    You voted for this, now enjoy it.

    • @sollunaystars
      @sollunaystars 8 годин тому +1

      Hey everyone! Found the brain dead parrot in the comments

    • @BritainRitten
      @BritainRitten 5 годин тому +1

      I will indeed enjoy having more housing opportunities AND a public park. (The current garden is private and would close to the public again as soon as this whole thing died down - as it was closed before)

    • @zed316
      @zed316 4 години тому +2

      You're right. I voted for affordable housing and help for the homeless.