You mean like the COVID checks handed out to "citizens" by the corporation he doesn't recognize as a legitimate government? Yeah, I wonder what his answer to that would be 🤔
This guy is a nightmare to anybody. He has no self reflection… Thinks he’s always right… Argumentative baselessly… And it’s always somebody else’s fault. Yeah he’s not done with the court system. What a POS.
Actually despite everything, he always seems to be willing to give him the chance to shape up. When he behaves like a grown-up, the judge is respectful and considerate.
Sov cit coaches: Okay my dude, act this way court, you'll definitely get your way! (Gets contempt) Jailhouse lawyers: ....Oh, you pulled that with SIMPSON? Nah, sit down, you wanna represent yourself, THIS is the way.
Seems to be how it's going. Whoever got to him first just had to say "they're gonna say you're in contempt or you're not competent because they're scared of our sovereignty", and sure enough, they question his competence & he's like "they knew the court would say that, I trust them now", and he's now barnacled to this soft-zit nonsense.
What "responsibility", for what "actions"??? For not automatically admitting guilt to the alleged crimes...? You do know he is innocent, right...? Well, at least until the state can PROVE his guilt...
@@brentfarvors192 I'm not speaking of the alleged crimes, as very little data is presented about those within this video. I'm referencing the defendant's words and actions that actually appear within this video, and the general character they highlight. Did you miss the whole sov-cit thing? That's all about avoiding responsibility and penalties.
@@brentfarvors192probably because he accused the court of being harsh on him simply because he wanted to represent himself which wasnt the case at all. That was his reason for his unruly behavior... The judge was harsh because he was rude but instead of just saying "i apologize for my behavior in court previously and will work on gaining your trust. Thank you" he ranted about why his behavior is justified. The last thing you want, is to be a hot head in court when youve got domestice violent charges and violent charges against police. I think he did well up until he started to give excuses and argue with the judge about his decision regarding bond. Its not a negotiation. Idk why he doesnt have a lawyer.
@@uggggggghhhhh he doesn't have a lawyer because he listens to those morons who tell him he doesn't need one, because the court has no jurisdiction over him if he denies his own name. Let him be. He'll just be off the streets all the longer.
Ive realized, after watching so many of these, that respect and honesty truly goes a long way with judges. They are there to protect your rights after all. The only judge Ive seen be very harsh and strict is Boyd.
I suspect that he got a little advice from his family and friends. "Why are you still in jail?" "Because I insulted the judge when he called me by my name." "Stop being a dumbass."
It’s a constitutional right here in the states, unfortunately. I get it, I understand why they made the decision they made to allow people to do it, but…I feel like people were just smarter back then, lol
@@kaythulucrewewell as we all know, there is plenty wrong with the constitution in this day and age. It’s been used and abused to destroy the us bit by bit
@@kaythulucreweno they weren't, they just didn't trust lawyers to fairly represent poor, uneducated clients. With a public defender system, there is no need for that particular constutional right
@@kaythulucrewethere was no obligation for a public defender until the 1960s, though there were some States that adopted earlier, and always pro bono lawyers. People were “allowed” to represent themselves because if you couldn’t afford a lawyer, you didn’t get one.
I’m in the UK and enjoy watching your videos. Our judges here are very “formal”. They don’t get involved in conversation or debate. I like how the US do things. Judge Simpson is a joy to watch. Thanks for posting.
@@legatomodi3522in the Crown Court yes (for case management, trial and sentencing of felony-equivalents) except where an application is made due to a vulnerable witness or defendant being in court, then it’s no wigs or gowns for judge and counsel. In the magistrates, civil and family courts, judges only wear wigs on formal occasions.
(after 30 days in jail for contempt) Defendant: "Your honor I haven't had enough time to review this one-hour video. I need more time." Judge: OK, how about 3 more weeks in jail? D: That sounds fine your honor J. If you need more time to review that one-hour video, let my staff know and we'll let you stay in jail another week so you'll have enough time. Everybody on UA-cam watching this video: "Do you think somebody needs a lawyer?"
I think most Sov Cits don't know what they are doing but I have seen several that keep this stuff up, especially for minor charges, and the judges eventually throw out the case, so it must work sometimes.
In jail you don't get time or access to computers and such to view videos at your leisure. So yes, he would likely need time and court approval to make that happen. Having a lawyer would obviously make the process a lot easier. Thou he would still have issues viewing the evidence for himself.
the cop is there as a witness only. He has nothing to do with the proceeedings. he is still on duty so he may very well be doing work. in other words, mind yo business.
Guess he didn't care. He's on duty and he could be being contacted by one of his subordinates about a issue. You act like he was playing angry birds or something. Calm down.
Cops know the rules. He's been in court before. He was working. Just like the prosecutor and the lawyers and others have PCs and monitors that most don't have access to but because it is about court/public servant 'work', all is good. In fact it might not even be his personal phone, it could very well be his work phone.
His Honor is a great teacher, and an even better gentleman. This was a beautiful exchange between 2 people who came to a place of meeting. I hope this experience has had a lasting effect on the defendant.
Actually, driving is a commercial event requiring a license, traveling however is a personal event and does not require a license, the Supreme Court Of the United States have already ruled on this like a billion times and yet we continue to rehash this over and over because people refuse to read, comprehend and acknowledge the difference between Legal and Lawful, the term Legal is a Corporate term, Lawful is a Constitutional term and if people would only take the time to read simple English we could all get along a whole lot better. Unfortunately, hardly anyone in America today can seem to comprehend common sense and logic, many people have no understanding of the Constitution and or Bill of Rights, it’s actually frightening how truly ignorant people really are in this Nation but it certainly says a lot about the crumbled state we now find ourselves in, it’s so frustrating. Part of the problem is people have been conditioned over a long period of time and thanks to the obfuscation of words such as Conspiracy Theory and Sovereign Citizen, people have been conditioned largely by way of propaganda to believe these are bad words/people. Let us dissect the term Sovereign and what it actually means shale we? sovereign [ sov-rin, sov-er-in, suhv- ] noun a monarch; a king, queen, or other supreme ruler. Synonyms: potentate, empress, emperor a person who has supreme power or authority. a group or body of persons or a state having sovereign authority. The word Sovereign has been bacterized into something it is not, if anyone can call anyone a Sovereign it be better served when talking about Police Officers, they have such a thing called Qualified Immunity and as a result more often than not become sovereign as it sadly by default puts them above the law and more often than not are not Heald accountable for their mistakes, I understand the original concept of creating such policies for law enforcement as they are often put in very bad situations and are forced sometimes to make rash quick decisions and this is a recipe for disaster because the system also gets abused and used as a protection claws leading to untrust worthy outcomes. While I agree we need something in place to protect our police sure, but it’s also up to us ‘We the People’ to be able to hold their feet to the fire and accountable for officers out of control and ego driven bad decision making, their certainly not infallible any more or less then anyone else. We often as a society put police officers up on a pedestal and once, we put them there they almost become aloud to act a fool and far to often for the wrong reasons, I’ve seen it a thousand times where police are truly out of control and downright tyrannical as if it’s Nazi Germany all over again and we as a people can not allow these bad actors, everyone one of us needs to be held accountable and so do police, no excuses period. I love our police, we need them now more than probably ever, their will always be bad people, but driving without a license is not a crime, it’s our God given right. It’s constitutional and has been ruled on many of times by the Supreme court and yet many of you continue to follow the status quo and go along with the program without so much as asking questions to actually find out if your actually right or not, simply read the Constitution to figure it out, it’s not rocket science, the Constitution is very plain and simple to understand, it was written in such a way the common man could easily understand it and yet so many of you still in 2024 refuse to read it. Its sickening and then you have the gall to wonder why our nation is in such shambles, look around you and open your minds and God given intelligence to figure it out. How long will it take? It’s so freaking frustrating, exacerbating… If your under the impression that you need permission to be free, then it’s likely your mind resides in a cage, free yourselves from this mental bondage, simply read the constitution and even more importantly, the bill of rights, these are our sacred founding documents, IMHO, these are the most important documents on planet earth and it might be time you figure it out. Put down your egos, take away the ignorance and just do it or forever be a slave. The choice is all you.
what sovcit doesn’t seem to get is that this judge is trying to help him. tough love, yes, but in dumbass’s interest. that cop behind him on the left looks like he would enjoy 10 minutes alone with Mr Travelling
I think that this guy is trying to emulate Alina Hubba. He would rather be pretty because he can fake being smart. Not in front of Judge Simpson he can't 🤔🤨🙄🤫🤭🥴😁😂
Is there anyway I can half that wolf sit on my shoulder to remind me of my choices and to know that Judge Simpson is not the only judge who can be very real with defendants in a courtroom, but if I ever did get in trouble I would only hope that I could get a judge like him! He is one of the realest judges I have ever seen, and although I’m no attorney he seems to really know his stuff and honestly seems to be truly impartial and looks out for the court as well as the defendant as long as they are respectful of the court! You seldomly ever see a judge show they have a heart only other judge I know of would be judge Caprio (sorry if I misspelled) these 2 men are an example of what all judges should be like. They have worked hard to know what they do and have done the time and deserve the respect they don’t demand but ask of everyone who comes before them, it only becomes a demand when those ppl need to be corrected! Judge Manning is also another judge I have come to respect out of Fulton County GA, she will hold her tongue as long as she can but when she gets to the point that fucs no longer apply it’s like a 💣 going off, you should check out the time she did a field sobriety test from the bench after throwing her robe on the floor and walking around the bench!
LOL! Overstand? Does that mean "To stand or insist too much or too long;" or "To stand too strictly on the demands or conditions" or "To stand on the price or conditions of, so as to lose a sale; to lose by an extravagant price or hard conditions"? It does not mean what he thinks it means.
Their grasp of the English language is ... at very best ... extremely lacking to begin with. If they understood English, they would easily be able to COMPREHEND that their legal nonsense is just that ... nonsense!
"Understand" is part of the sovtards lingo, they think they stand under the concept so kinda submitting to it, and that doesn't fly with their narrative so they had to invent a way to say it differently.
Like I've said many times.. give them a check with all caps name and they'd snatch it right up. Oh look buddy your actions have consequences, so you get to stay in custody.
Have you ever had to make notes from a video? We have to make documentation of Teams meetings with customer and notate every action they demonstrate to us to build automations. It generates many questions too. Several days and as someone else pointed out, they may have limited access to the equipment to view it.
i don't know why he would need more time to review the body cam footage, it's not like he's an attorney who wasn't there, he was there! so he should know what went down and how he behaved better then any footage.
Defendant obviously has never seen a rerun of Lockup. "Trustee" usually refers to prisoners that get jobs like laundry, food service, janitorial within the housing unit, but I guess he didn't encounter any of that in his 30 day stay in taxpayer funded facilities. Also, a "kite"... you're using clandestine channels to receive official information/instructions?
Has anyone who represented themselves ever won a case - ever? I doubt it. Is your need to think you are the smartest person in the room really worth a lengthy prison sentence? Because that is how you will learn you were not that smart after all. Get a lawyer!
So his threats were about what he'd do to the officer in court, were they? And that would also be the case with the SAME threats that he made regarding the officer's dog? Because we have SO many cases of people suing dogs in court. From Snide Laughing Bully to World's Biggest Victim...and oh so ILL! In 30 days. Bullies are always the same. WHAT a big surprise it isn't that he's a domestic abuser as well. Every grubby cliche rolled up in one self adoring, sniveling, wife beating, animal threatening package.
Is jailed for contempt but is still planning to use video footage where he most likely can be seen doing the same thing as a defense for his court case.
Another manipulator userwants the court to ordrt jail staff to obey his orders. He may be getting his due gifts. Now judge i didnt mean to injure him. Bull shit send him to prison for long time see he wanted put jail time out of the question😊
Can we perhaps attribute his new-found good behavior to some medication that he didn't take as he ought, but was more or less forced to by the jail staff once he was under their care, custody, and control?
It's possible because of this guy's smart elleck additude like everyone around him is ignorant enough to believe he is not him , him committed a crime not he.he overstands. He just can't stop with the arrogant infitile word play like a 3 year old.
It's a toss up at the gray bar hotel, in a long warm shower, did this feckless inmate fall in with a jailhouse lawyer, or a newly minted feckless sovereign citizen evading justice for criminal acts?
Nothing a good stint in jail can’t fix. He went from contemptuous smart mouthed idiot to respectful semi-smart sounding man. “Sir…. Your honor…” Still screwed though but at least he fixed himself.
It's more likely to be the channel's auto mod settings deleting things not UA-cam itself. Each channel can designate certain words as "inappropriate" and any post using those words is either automatically deleted or held back for the creator to review. Mostly this is done to stop offensive comments but some channels don't want "contentious" subjects like religion or politics either.
@@KR15ING I do have atuo-modding turned on to curtail nasty bot driven weird comments that have nothing to do with the channel. And I have a selection of keywords and phrases I would like avoided. Some of those words or phrases can mis-flag from time to time, but I'd rather some comments get pruned needlessly than one of those bot comments to get through. Those things are truly horrid sometimes, and I don't have time to filter the comments manually to watch for them all... they never stop.
Any person who represents themselves in court has a fool for a client. I can watch a video on how to perform a surgery but it doesn’t mean I have the skills to do it correctly with going through medical school.
I love seeing that sov-cit hit the brick wall of justice & pay the price for his arrogance, but I also empathize with his situation. He's intellectually challenged. He's extremely gullible. I don't like to throw around "brainwashed" in this sense, as he seems to have knowledge of his surroundings. But he's doubling down, and seems to think this is the only way to react - the script. All he knows is the script. He's simply not competent. I agree with the 30 days, completely - but anything beyond this, he's going to need to be shown all the other sov-cit videos until he's deprogrammed - or at least aware of the 100% failure rate of sov-cits in court. Whoever is coaching these slow, gullible people, shame on you. Your sov-cit scripts have brought only misery. It's no wonder Joel Osteen has several mansions & Lambos, there are people out there just begging to be ruled. It takes a rotten person to prey on the intellectually challenged.
My comment snuck thru after all! Thanks! Was pretty sure I didn't use the R word, which I'm with Louis C.K. with on its use. Just can't say it without a Boston accent. HELP THE R'TAAHDID!
@@markroe8229 I think it's proven that he's simple & gullible, but it's a stretch to say 'brainwashed'. These cultists don't deserve an inch of sway with their scripts. I'm just saying there's a grey area between competent and incompetent that's being ignored. Just because he can string sentences together, knows the sun rises east & sets west, doesn't mean he's able to make decisions like this. I love seeing his arrogance stepped on & his contempt punished - but notice what some of these guys do - like Eric Martin, who is brainwashed - they double down with the scripts - they aren't aware of the other things in their tool box. But we have to be careful to not penalize them for more than what they're on trial for, the amount of court time they waste, and their behavior in court. They didn't have that good parent or that one friend who would put them in check. It's a lot like cultism & religion in that script told him "they're going to accuse you of being incompetent, they're going to say you're wrong, they're going to say blah, blah". Then he hears these "prophecies" come true, and he believes the scripts even deeper. When he's got 30 days to consider his defense, the sov-cits are there waiting, like vultures, to coach him. He should be deemed incompetent or at least treated in a mental health facility. He could be advised to watch UA-cam sov cit courtroom videos. Even these comments.
I'm presuming the defendant is only being allowed to view the portion of bodycam footage pertaining to the officers contact with the defendant, versus the officers entire days duty shift?
If you had watched Old Squishy's video, you would have seen his text comments splattered all over the screen. You would also notice a lack of that commentary on my edit. If you watched BOTH, you would notice that these edits are dramatically different, as I went back and pulled the previous appearances and edited them into this docket call. What you don't see, but hear is the extra time I spent normalizing and minimizing pops and clicks from the audio. So, let me assure you... although Squishy and I did cover the same case, this WAS NOT Squishy's edit.
These dockets do not belong to squishy. They are available for anyone to use for transparency purposes. Show me the timestamps where the video edits match Squishy's video edits exactly and I'll pay you $100. You can't do it, you know how I know? Because I spent over an hour of my time editing and constructing this presentation to publish, after I'd already watched Squishy's presentation to try and steer clear of making the same points he did in his presentation... Does it make ya'll feel better about yourselves commenting about things you have no clue about?
The judge . Joking about he would take a box of envelopes to the jail to sell for a dollar each!?!? That is despicable!! A lot of the inmates are indigent and the others have limited income or none while incarcerated and they are being charged a dollar an envelope!!! That's despicable, outrageous , criminal in itself and should certainly be against the law if not the constitution!! It's inhumane treatment. Rights are being violated if they have to write to defend their case and can't afford the envelope. Its so offensive it shocks the rational mind! The judge showed no concern much less endeavored to right this travesty or at least verbalize it. Wow! Do all our jails care more about their greed than the humanity they are responsible for??
Your viewpoint is noted, although somewhat lacking in substance. Yes, quite a number of inmates are likely indigent, however, I believe most all of them have enough sense to allow court-appointed attorneys to represent them, unlike this young man. The defendant raised the issue of envelopes costing a dollar. The judge had no awareness of how much they cost. He interjected a little humor into the situation, which even the defendant found funny. If you find that so offensive, maybe the problem is with you. No constitutional rights are being violated by charging inmates a dollar for an envelope. How much are stamped envelopes at the post office? Most people are jailed because of doing something illegal. If they made wiser choices, they wouldn't be in a situation where they're locked up and stuck to buy envelopes for a dollar each. Again, if this defendant had chosen to accept and work with his court-appointed counsel, he wouldn't need to be concerned about getting correspondence to the judge, as his lawyer would have taken care of it. From the looks of him, the defendant wasn't being treated inhumanely while in jail, nor did he express such. The defendant's rights aren't being violated. In fact, the judge is doing all he can to ensure that isn't happening. The prison-industrial complex is certainly a real issue, that needs to be addressed, but that's not going to be righted by any judge. That's the responsibility of legislators. Have you contacted yours about the issue? Perhaps that's where your "righteous indignation" should be directed.
He is one of those jokers that don't think covid is real but is conveniently complaining about covid. Your just supposedly ill it ain't got shit to do with covid 😂
Why do people want to represent themselves? I never understand this. I mean, even if you were sov cit. you put yourself at such an obvious disadvantage before you even start the process. I wonder what the argument is for self handicapping yourself in such a way is
That was nasty of the prosecutor to say he didn't need to see the bodycam cause she doesn't plan to use it as evidence. Obv she has a duty to hand _everything_ over, and he has a right to fully review it.
They had handed over the videos. Watch it again. The body cam footage is on the thumb drive. The defendant hadn't watched all the footage - maybe if he had a lawyer they would have reviewed it!
@@interestedobserver587 He clearly explained he hadn't been given enough time by the jail to review it. Prosecutor should then support him getting more time, instead of arguing to the judge that it wasn't relevant evidence anyway.
@@user-fe9dj6wq8eIt isn't the prosecutor's job to protect the defendent's rights. The prosecutor is there to represent the people and present their own case. That's why we have defense attorneys, so they can point things out like 'the prosecutor is pulling a trick' - totally legal, and inherent to an adversarial justice system. What's impressive is that the defendent was able to defend himself against the prosecutor effectively without a defense lawyer. She did nothing wrong, she simply stated what she did and didn't need for her own case, and he stated what he did and didn't need for his.
Hey, you'll never guess what his political leanings are. It was perfectly predictable, and yet all kinds of people are still willing to be his ally, even if they're making fun of him on UA-cam. If you're a Trumper, you are this guy, and this guy is you.
Seems that time spent was useful. Not only did he cool it with the attitude, but he actually put some effort into some real defense, requesting & attempting to view the footage and bringing up logistics issues with the jail. Now his arguments of identity... still dumb.
Agreed, I think for not having any legal training, he did fairly good. (It also helps to be polite/cordial and Not antagonize the judge😵💫) BUT, I also believe it would still be in his best interest (at minimum) to avail himself of a public defender, (at least as second chair), and to set aside any of that Sovereign Citizen BS at least until the conclusion of THIS case. I wouldn't want to risk YEARS of imprisonment, (or losing many rights/freedoms for felony convictions) based on a "hypothesis/theory" about the legal system. Especially based on some YT videos about on a subject that many people spend YEARS of their lives learning about, (to just end up being mediocre at doing in the end).🙄😳 I wish him luck with his case and his apparent lack of self control that got him to where he is today. 🤔🙂
@@fluphybunny930as the D&D saying goes: there's a reason intelligence and wisdom are different stats. He's a fool, but likely isn't as dumb as he sounds. One of those rarer cases where if he wasn't sucked into sovcittery he'd probably have made something of himself.
Whatever annoys the Judge is open to being in contempt I have seen Judges put people in contempt for their clothes, his laughing and smirking shows he doesn’t take this seriously.
Let's ask this..."When a check arrives in the mail in that name, are you THEN Thomas Styron?"
You mean like the COVID checks handed out to "citizens" by the corporation he doesn't recognize as a legitimate government? Yeah, I wonder what his answer to that would be 🤔
What's his name on the dating app?? Not Casanova Romeo i'll bet?
This guy is a nightmare to anybody. He has no self reflection… Thinks he’s always right… Argumentative baselessly… And it’s always somebody else’s fault. Yeah he’s not done with the court system. What a POS.
Could you imagine if a president of the country acted like that?….oh, wait. Sorry, never mind.
It's sad how common that personality is these days. You see it a ton in Chicago.
@@Blyndir You see it everywhere these days....don't understand it.
@@paulmcdougall9653ex president!
Typical narcissistic behaviour.
I like how the prosecutor just sits back and lets him talk himself into jail time.
Guess the jail must be a pretty good place to be; he keeps sending himself back.
"People vs. Thomas Styron. Here we go." Judge is already disgusted.
Actually despite everything, he always seems to be willing to give him the chance to shape up. When he behaves like a grown-up, the judge is respectful and considerate.
Sovereign citizen. Explains EVERYTHING.
"This is a court of law not a clown show"
He was civil because he just spent time in jail for contempt.
Well no kidding 😂😂
The process works! At least sometimes lol.
😅Amen!
Judge Simpson has the patience of a Judge.
“I don’t understand, sir”…well, a lawyer could explain that to you.
I noticed Sovcits use "I don't understand" alot.
Sov cit coaches: Okay my dude, act this way court, you'll definitely get your way!
(Gets contempt)
Jailhouse lawyers: ....Oh, you pulled that with SIMPSON? Nah, sit down, you wanna represent yourself, THIS is the way.
Bet sovcits are the lolcows of prison. Other inmates troll them for fun.
Seems to be how it's going. Whoever got to him first just had to say "they're gonna say you're in contempt or you're not competent because they're scared of our sovereignty", and sure enough, they question his competence & he's like "they knew the court would say that, I trust them now", and he's now barnacled to this soft-zit nonsense.
Defendant's demeanor is much improved in that final bit, but his inability to take responsibility for his actions still comes shining through.
What "responsibility", for what "actions"??? For not automatically admitting guilt to the alleged crimes...? You do know he is innocent, right...? Well, at least until the state can PROVE his guilt...
@@brentfarvors192 I'm not speaking of the alleged crimes, as very little data is presented about those within this video. I'm referencing the defendant's words and actions that actually appear within this video, and the general character they highlight.
Did you miss the whole sov-cit thing? That's all about avoiding responsibility and penalties.
@@brentfarvors192probably because he accused the court of being harsh on him simply because he wanted to represent himself which wasnt the case at all. That was his reason for his unruly behavior... The judge was harsh because he was rude but instead of just saying "i apologize for my behavior in court previously and will work on gaining your trust. Thank you" he ranted about why his behavior is justified.
The last thing you want, is to be a hot head in court when youve got domestice violent charges and violent charges against police.
I think he did well up until he started to give excuses and argue with the judge about his decision regarding bond. Its not a negotiation.
Idk why he doesnt have a lawyer.
@@uggggggghhhhh That's a very good analysis.
@@uggggggghhhhh he doesn't have a lawyer because he listens to those morons who tell him he doesn't need one, because the court has no jurisdiction over him if he denies his own name.
Let him be. He'll just be off the streets all the longer.
Sovereign can't remember their names.The brain is stuck in pre- Toddler stage.
This guy made a complete turnaround, so a mental evaluation is in order.
Defendant representing himself goes like: Judge: "State, is there an offer?" State: "No, judge."
I love this judge. He tolerates no BS.
But he listens!
He admitted that he's an ass in court because the previous judges let him get away with it.
I love the Judge's bailiff who stands there wryly observing much foolishness by defendants.
Oh we all do!😉
Stupid and arrogant at the same time. What a nightmare to deal with this fool. Poor Judge he has my sympathies.
Ive realized, after watching so many of these, that respect and honesty truly goes a long way with judges. They are there to protect your rights after all.
The only judge Ive seen be very harsh and strict is Boyd.
I suspect that he got a little advice from his family and friends.
"Why are you still in jail?"
"Because I insulted the judge when he called me by my name."
"Stop being a dumbass."
He representing himself using prison lingo 😂😂😂.
All this because derpbrain was driving without a license......
That seems to be how all this BS starts with these Sovcits. Then goes into other charges. They're so stupid.
Love Judge Simpson
Thank you, my friend, for putting these together like this. Much appreciated!
My pleasure!
Yup. Use the legal system and waste more and more taxpayer funds.
Thats why we pay for taxes. So everyone has the chance to defend themselves in court.
Youre insane to be mad at him for it.
Yes let the criminals n looters go free but lets him in jail to satisfy judges ego.. great use of tax money
Stop letting high school dropouts represent themselves in court and most of the shenanigans will go away
It’s a constitutional right here in the states, unfortunately. I get it, I understand why they made the decision they made to allow people to do it, but…I feel like people were just smarter back then, lol
@@kaythulucrewewell as we all know, there is plenty wrong with the constitution in this day and age. It’s been used and abused to destroy the us bit by bit
@@kaythulucreweno they weren't, they just didn't trust lawyers to fairly represent poor, uneducated clients. With a public defender system, there is no need for that particular constutional right
@@kaythulucrewethere was no obligation for a public defender until the 1960s, though there were some States that adopted earlier, and always pro bono lawyers. People were “allowed” to represent themselves because if you couldn’t afford a lawyer, you didn’t get one.
Ignoring the Constitution is always the way to go.
He needs an attorney. Because he represents himself, he has a fool for a client!
🤣🤣🤣🤣👍👍
And the fools lawyer is an idiot too...
This is a Sov Cit classic.
Jail and logic. What a cure THAT is!
Still thinks he can run from police and drive without a license. Wasting time of the court and those officers.
Well done Judge Simpson!
I’m in the UK and enjoy watching your videos.
Our judges here are very “formal”. They don’t get involved in conversation or debate.
I like how the US do things. Judge Simpson is a joy to watch. Thanks for posting.
Do judges still wear those hardcore white wigs in the UK?
@@legatomodi3522in the Crown Court yes (for case management, trial and sentencing of felony-equivalents) except where an application is made due to a vulnerable witness or defendant being in court, then it’s no wigs or gowns for judge and counsel. In the magistrates, civil and family courts, judges only wear wigs on formal occasions.
Did the court get new cameras? Great clear video.
The Sov Cit guy is a fool.
I remember one envelope used to cost 10cents LOL
(after 30 days in jail for contempt)
Defendant: "Your honor I haven't had enough time to review this one-hour video. I need more time."
Judge: OK, how about 3 more weeks in jail?
D: That sounds fine your honor
J. If you need more time to review that one-hour video, let my staff know and we'll let you stay in jail another week so you'll have enough time.
Everybody on UA-cam watching this video: "Do you think somebody needs a lawyer?"
I think most Sov Cits don't know what they are doing but I have seen several that keep this stuff up, especially for minor charges, and the judges eventually throw out the case, so it must work sometimes.
In jail you don't get time or access to computers and such to view videos at your leisure. So yes, he would likely need time and court approval to make that happen. Having a lawyer would obviously make the process a lot easier. Thou he would still have issues viewing the evidence for himself.
He hadn’t been allowed to view the videos until the day before, and since it’s JAIL, he doesn’t get unlimited time or access to equipment.
he probably doesn't mind being in jail to be honest
1 of 12 videos was one hour, they didn't know how long the rest were.
I'm surprised Judge Simpson did not admonish the sergeant to stop playing with his damned cell phone!
Admonish. A great word slipped in there, if I may say so.
"That man is playing Galaga." - Iron Man.
the cop is there as a witness only. He has nothing to do with the proceeedings. he is still on duty so he may very well be doing work. in other words, mind yo business.
Guess he didn't care. He's on duty and he could be being contacted by one of his subordinates about a issue. You act like he was playing angry birds or something.
Calm down.
Cops know the rules. He's been in court before. He was working. Just like the prosecutor and the lawyers and others have PCs and monitors that most don't have access to but because it is about court/public servant 'work', all is good. In fact it might not even be his personal phone, it could very well be his work phone.
What a little punk.
He was fine until he said he didn't think his demeanor 😮😮😮😮
His Honor is a great teacher, and an even better gentleman. This was a beautiful exchange between 2 people who came to a place of meeting. I hope this experience has had a lasting effect on the defendant.
Dang right you don’t give him a reduced bond , especially when you see how many officers are there in case he kicks off .
"There must be some confusion"
when they pull that "that's not me" crap, they should be fingerprinted on the spot.
Driving is a privledge, you have no right to endanger other road users.
Actually, driving is a commercial event requiring a license, traveling however is a personal event and does not require a license, the Supreme Court Of the United States have already ruled on this like a billion times and yet we continue to rehash this over and over because people refuse to read, comprehend and acknowledge the difference between Legal and Lawful, the term Legal is a Corporate term, Lawful is a Constitutional term and if people would only take the time to read simple English we could all get along a whole lot better.
Unfortunately, hardly anyone in America today can seem to comprehend common sense and logic, many people have no understanding of the Constitution and or Bill of Rights, it’s actually frightening how truly ignorant people really are in this Nation but it certainly says a lot about the crumbled state we now find ourselves in, it’s so frustrating.
Part of the problem is people have been conditioned over a long period of time and thanks to the obfuscation of words such as Conspiracy Theory and Sovereign Citizen, people have been conditioned largely by way of propaganda to believe these are bad words/people. Let us dissect the term Sovereign and what it actually means shale we?
sovereign
[ sov-rin, sov-er-in, suhv- ]
noun
a monarch; a king, queen, or other supreme ruler.
Synonyms: potentate, empress, emperor
a person who has supreme power or authority.
a group or body of persons or a state having sovereign authority.
The word Sovereign has been bacterized into something it is not, if anyone can call anyone a Sovereign it be better served when talking about Police Officers, they have such a thing called Qualified Immunity and as a result more often than not become sovereign as it sadly by default puts them above the law and more often than not are not Heald accountable for their mistakes, I understand the original concept of creating such policies for law enforcement as they are often put in very bad situations and are forced sometimes to make rash quick decisions and this is a recipe for disaster because the system also gets abused and used as a protection claws leading to untrust worthy outcomes. While I agree we need something in place to protect our police sure, but it’s also up to us ‘We the People’ to be able to hold their feet to the fire and accountable for officers out of control and ego driven bad decision making, their certainly not infallible any more or less then anyone else. We often as a society put police officers up on a pedestal and once, we put them there they almost become aloud to act a fool and far to often for the wrong reasons, I’ve seen it a thousand times where police are truly out of control and downright tyrannical as if it’s Nazi Germany all over again and we as a people can not allow these bad actors, everyone one of us needs to be held accountable and so do police, no excuses period.
I love our police, we need them now more than probably ever, their will always be bad people, but driving without a license is not a crime, it’s our God given right. It’s constitutional and has been ruled on many of times by the Supreme court and yet many of you continue to follow the status quo and go along with the program without so much as asking questions to actually find out if your actually right or not, simply read the Constitution to figure it out, it’s not rocket science, the Constitution is very plain and simple to understand, it was written in such a way the common man could easily understand it and yet so many of you still in 2024 refuse to read it. Its sickening and then you have the gall to wonder why our nation is in such shambles, look around you and open your minds and God given intelligence to figure it out. How long will it take? It’s so freaking frustrating, exacerbating…
If your under the impression that you need permission to be free, then it’s likely your mind resides in a cage, free yourselves from this mental bondage, simply read the constitution and even more importantly, the bill of rights, these are our sacred founding documents, IMHO, these are the most important documents on planet earth and it might be time you figure it out. Put down your egos, take away the ignorance and just do it or forever be a slave. The choice is all you.
This guy fled and attacked cops? What a shock
what sovcit doesn’t seem to get is that this judge is trying to help him. tough love, yes, but in dumbass’s interest. that cop behind him on the left looks like he would enjoy 10 minutes alone with Mr Travelling
so true
He tried to pull the SovIdiot nonsense.
I think that this guy is trying to emulate Alina Hubba. He would rather be pretty because he can fake being smart. Not in front of Judge Simpson he can't 🤔🤨🙄🤫🤭🥴😁😂
Is there anyway I can half that wolf sit on my shoulder to remind me of my choices and to know that Judge Simpson is not the only judge who can be very real with defendants in a courtroom, but if I ever did get in trouble I would only hope that I could get a judge like him! He is one of the realest judges I have ever seen, and although I’m no attorney he seems to really know his stuff and honestly seems to be truly impartial and looks out for the court as well as the defendant as long as they are respectful of the court! You seldomly ever see a judge show they have a heart only other judge I know of would be judge Caprio (sorry if I misspelled) these 2 men are an example of what all judges should be like. They have worked hard to know what they do and have done the time and deserve the respect they don’t demand but ask of everyone who comes before them, it only becomes a demand when those ppl need to be corrected! Judge Manning is also another judge I have come to respect out of Fulton County GA, she will hold her tongue as long as she can but when she gets to the point that fucs no longer apply it’s like a 💣 going off, you should check out the time she did a field sobriety test from the bench after throwing her robe on the floor and walking around the bench!
The law is never a DIY project. Not for criminal, probate, will's or anything else.
LOL! Overstand? Does that mean "To stand or insist too much or too long;" or "To stand too strictly on the demands or conditions" or "To stand on the price or conditions of, so as to lose a sale; to lose by an extravagant price or hard conditions"? It does not mean what he thinks it means.
Their grasp of the English language is ... at very best ... extremely lacking to begin with. If they understood English, they would easily be able to COMPREHEND that their legal nonsense is just that ... nonsense!
We joke and say stand under, but over stand?
Well obviously it's the opposite of understand. If you don't understand something then you overstand.
"Understand" is part of the sovtards lingo, they think they stand under the concept so kinda submitting to it, and that doesn't fly with their narrative so they had to invent a way to say it differently.
Like I've said many times.. give them a check with all caps name and they'd snatch it right up.
Oh look buddy your actions have consequences, so you get to stay in custody.
Sovereign are thankful for Jail times.Most havesiezed cars .Finding Alleys to sleep in is becoming difficult!
So it takes 3weeks to view a one hour video…
When you are in jail and do not have access to computers... it might.
Have you ever had to make notes from a video? We have to make documentation of Teams meetings with customer and notate every action they demonstrate to us to build automations. It generates many questions too. Several days and as someone else pointed out, they may have limited access to the equipment to view it.
Sometimes and in certain cases democracy is a pain. :)
Jail makes my tummy hurt judge
Man...That was so cool. 😎 Great vid on everyone involved. Dang...
WOW, 3 cops behind him now! Has he been "acting up" ?
Oh God, THIS Mouth Breather again...
i don't know why he would need more time to review the body cam footage, it's not like he's an attorney who wasn't there, he was there! so he should know what went down and how he behaved better then any footage.
Really...? If the law allows you to represent yourself, it also needs to guarantee your access to the evidence as if you were a lawyer.
He needs more time to figure out how he can attempt to twist things around. What occurred in his mind is different from actual events.
He might have learned a thing or two. Isn’t that what this is all about? Seems like a positive.
should have kept your mouth shut in the beginning and let your attorney deal with it. , you'd be out on bond
Defendant obviously has never seen a rerun of Lockup. "Trustee" usually refers to prisoners that get jobs like laundry, food service, janitorial within the housing unit, but I guess he didn't encounter any of that in his 30 day stay in taxpayer funded facilities. Also, a "kite"... you're using clandestine channels to receive official information/instructions?
Has anyone who represented themselves ever won a case - ever? I doubt it. Is your need to think you are the smartest person in the room really worth a lengthy prison sentence? Because that is how you will learn you were not that smart after all. Get a lawyer!
Yes, but when they do win, the evidence of Innocence is clear, so the Judge find not guilty or drop the charges
So his threats were about what he'd do to the officer in court, were they?
And that would also be the case with the SAME threats that he made regarding the officer's dog?
Because we have SO many cases of people suing dogs in court.
From Snide Laughing Bully to World's Biggest Victim...and oh so ILL! In 30 days.
Bullies are always the same.
WHAT a big surprise it isn't that he's a domestic abuser as well.
Every grubby cliche rolled up in one self adoring, sniveling, wife beating, animal threatening package.
How does the court not have a "script" or procedure to swiftly address the sovcit movement yet? What kinds of legislation would be needed for that? 🤔
Yes let the criminals n looters go free but lets him in jail to satisfy judges ego.. great use of tax money
I wonder if by watching the police body cams did he see just how stupid he presents himself?
Is jailed for contempt but is still planning to use video footage where he most likely can be seen doing the same thing as a defense for his court case.
Another manipulator userwants the court to ordrt jail staff to obey his orders. He may be getting his due gifts. Now judge i didnt mean to injure him. Bull shit send him to prison for long time see he wanted put jail time out of the question😊
Can we perhaps attribute his new-found good behavior to some medication that he didn't take as he ought, but was more or less forced to by the jail staff once he was under their care, custody, and control?
no r u two related
Stalling. But no jive, which is a relief.
I hope we get a follow-up to this.
I'm surprised that Judge Simpson didn't call out the cop at the prosecution's table for being on his cell phone while in court. Disrespectful.
Guess it wasn't disrespectful. He's on duty, and as such he could be usung the phone for work purposes.
It's possible because of this guy's smart elleck additude like everyone around him is ignorant enough to believe he is not him , him committed a crime not he.he overstands. He just can't stop with the arrogant infitile word play like a 3 year old.
It's a toss up at the gray bar hotel, in a long warm shower, did this feckless inmate fall in with a jailhouse lawyer, or a newly minted feckless sovereign citizen evading justice for criminal acts?
Nothing a good stint in jail can’t fix. He went from contemptuous smart mouthed idiot to respectful semi-smart sounding man. “Sir…. Your honor…”
Still screwed though but at least he fixed himself.
UA-cam, stop scrubbing comments.
It's more likely to be the channel's auto mod settings deleting things not UA-cam itself. Each channel can designate certain words as "inappropriate" and any post using those words is either automatically deleted or held back for the creator to review. Mostly this is done to stop offensive comments but some channels don't want "contentious" subjects like religion or politics either.
@@KR15ING I do have atuo-modding turned on to curtail nasty bot driven weird comments that have nothing to do with the channel. And I have a selection of keywords and phrases I would like avoided. Some of those words or phrases can mis-flag from time to time, but I'd rather some comments get pruned needlessly than one of those bot comments to get through. Those things are truly horrid sometimes, and I don't have time to filter the comments manually to watch for them all... they never stop.
So what words or phrases do you decide that people shouldn't say?
@@MJJR247 That would be telling. I am not a number, I am a free man. Be seeing you.
Free man, but dictate comments from viewers....got it
Any person who represents themselves in court has a fool for a client. I can watch a video on how to perform a surgery but it doesn’t mean I have the skills to do it correctly with going through medical school.
I love seeing that sov-cit hit the brick wall of justice & pay the price for his arrogance, but I also empathize with his situation. He's intellectually challenged. He's extremely gullible. I don't like to throw around "brainwashed" in this sense, as he seems to have knowledge of his surroundings. But he's doubling down, and seems to think this is the only way to react - the script. All he knows is the script. He's simply not competent. I agree with the 30 days, completely - but anything beyond this, he's going to need to be shown all the other sov-cit videos until he's deprogrammed - or at least aware of the 100% failure rate of sov-cits in court.
Whoever is coaching these slow, gullible people, shame on you. Your sov-cit scripts have brought only misery. It's no wonder Joel Osteen has several mansions & Lambos, there are people out there just begging to be ruled. It takes a rotten person to prey on the intellectually challenged.
My comment snuck thru after all! Thanks! Was pretty sure I didn't use the R word, which I'm with Louis C.K. with on its use. Just can't say it without a Boston accent. HELP THE R'TAAHDID!
@@NunchucksHabitBut Sir, ignorance of the law is no excuse... neither is just plain ignorance.
@@markroe8229 I think it's proven that he's simple & gullible, but it's a stretch to say 'brainwashed'. These cultists don't deserve an inch of sway with their scripts. I'm just saying there's a grey area between competent and incompetent that's being ignored. Just because he can string sentences together, knows the sun rises east & sets west, doesn't mean he's able to make decisions like this. I love seeing his arrogance stepped on & his contempt punished - but notice what some of these guys do - like Eric Martin, who is brainwashed - they double down with the scripts - they aren't aware of the other things in their tool box. But we have to be careful to not penalize them for more than what they're on trial for, the amount of court time they waste, and their behavior in court. They didn't have that good parent or that one friend who would put them in check. It's a lot like cultism & religion in that script told him "they're going to accuse you of being incompetent, they're going to say you're wrong, they're going to say blah, blah". Then he hears these "prophecies" come true, and he believes the scripts even deeper. When he's got 30 days to consider his defense, the sov-cits are there waiting, like vultures, to coach him. He should be deemed incompetent or at least treated in a mental health facility. He could be advised to watch UA-cam sov cit courtroom videos. Even these comments.
We've seen this video a lot.
I'm presuming the defendant is only being allowed to view the portion of bodycam footage pertaining to the officers contact with the defendant, versus the officers entire days duty shift?
“I overstand” is so fucking cringey.
Obviously, he does not know that "overstand" means to argue or insist too long.
just ask who is mum and dad are?
Oh him again
Seen him a lot lately
Why would they let the guy bond out?
Ty for your work ❤🙏🏾
Pretty sure it's just old squishy gardener work, he uploaded this case a week ago or more
@@danielbyrne5402 yeah I noticed too👍🏿
If you had watched Old Squishy's video, you would have seen his text comments splattered all over the screen. You would also notice a lack of that commentary on my edit. If you watched BOTH, you would notice that these edits are dramatically different, as I went back and pulled the previous appearances and edited them into this docket call. What you don't see, but hear is the extra time I spent normalizing and minimizing pops and clicks from the audio. So, let me assure you... although Squishy and I did cover the same case, this WAS NOT Squishy's edit.
These dockets do not belong to squishy. They are available for anyone to use for transparency purposes. Show me the timestamps where the video edits match Squishy's video edits exactly and I'll pay you $100.
You can't do it, you know how I know?
Because I spent over an hour of my time editing and constructing this presentation to publish, after I'd already watched Squishy's presentation to try and steer clear of making the same points he did in his presentation...
Does it make ya'll feel better about yourselves commenting about things you have no clue about?
@@LoneWolfUsul Thanks for clarifying! We so much similar stuff! Still like your work!❤️👍🏿
The judge . Joking about he would take a box of envelopes to the jail to sell for a dollar each!?!? That is despicable!! A lot of the inmates are indigent and the others have limited income or none while incarcerated and they are being charged a dollar an envelope!!! That's despicable, outrageous , criminal in itself and should certainly be against the law if not the constitution!! It's inhumane treatment. Rights are being violated if they have to write to defend their case and can't afford the envelope. Its so offensive it shocks the rational mind! The judge showed no concern much less endeavored to right this travesty or at least verbalize it. Wow! Do all our jails care more about their greed than the humanity they are responsible for??
Your viewpoint is noted, although somewhat lacking in substance. Yes, quite a number of inmates are likely indigent, however, I believe most all of them have enough sense to allow court-appointed attorneys to represent them, unlike this young man. The defendant raised the issue of envelopes costing a dollar. The judge had no awareness of how much they cost. He interjected a little humor into the situation, which even the defendant found funny. If you find that so offensive, maybe the problem is with you. No constitutional rights are being violated by charging inmates a dollar for an envelope. How much are stamped envelopes at the post office? Most people are jailed because of doing something illegal. If they made wiser choices, they wouldn't be in a situation where they're locked up and stuck to buy envelopes for a dollar each. Again, if this defendant had chosen to accept and work with his court-appointed counsel, he wouldn't need to be concerned about getting correspondence to the judge, as his lawyer would have taken care of it. From the looks of him, the defendant wasn't being treated inhumanely while in jail, nor did he express such. The defendant's rights aren't being violated. In fact, the judge is doing all he can to ensure that isn't happening. The prison-industrial complex is certainly a real issue, that needs to be addressed, but that's not going to be righted by any judge. That's the responsibility of legislators. Have you contacted yours about the issue? Perhaps that's where your "righteous indignation" should be directed.
@@nphil1229 🎯 very well said - best way to avoid paying a dollar per envelope while you’re in jail and indigent, would be to make better choices.
You call 30 days lots of jail? What a waste of 27 minutes
He is one of those jokers that don't think covid is real but is conveniently complaining about covid. Your just supposedly ill it ain't got shit to do with covid 😂
Why do people want to represent themselves? I never understand this. I mean, even if you were sov cit. you put yourself at such an obvious disadvantage before you even start the process. I wonder what the argument is for self handicapping yourself in such a way is
Squirming like Trump, eventually he will go to prison.
TRUMP24
That was nasty of the prosecutor to say he didn't need to see the bodycam cause she doesn't plan to use it as evidence. Obv she has a duty to hand _everything_ over, and he has a right to fully review it.
Erm... nope.
They had handed over the videos. Watch it again.
The body cam footage is on the thumb drive. The defendant hadn't watched all the footage - maybe if he had a lawyer they would have reviewed it!
@@interestedobserver587 He clearly explained he hadn't been given enough time by the jail to review it. Prosecutor should then support him getting more time, instead of arguing to the judge that it wasn't relevant evidence anyway.
@@user-fe9dj6wq8eIt isn't the prosecutor's job to protect the defendent's rights. The prosecutor is there to represent the people and present their own case. That's why we have defense attorneys, so they can point things out like 'the prosecutor is pulling a trick' - totally legal, and inherent to an adversarial justice system. What's impressive is that the defendent was able to defend himself against the prosecutor effectively without a defense lawyer. She did nothing wrong, she simply stated what she did and didn't need for her own case, and he stated what he did and didn't need for his.
@@TJSchongar Wait, do you think a prosecutor has no ethical obligations? Do you think she wouldn't have had to turn over the bodycam footage at all?
Hey, you'll never guess what his political leanings are. It was perfectly predictable, and yet all kinds of people are still willing to be his ally, even if they're making fun of him on UA-cam.
If you're a Trumper, you are this guy, and this guy is you.
He got a kite back? This guys been in jail before for sure
Seems that time spent was useful. Not only did he cool it with the attitude, but he actually put some effort into some real defense, requesting & attempting to view the footage and bringing up logistics issues with the jail. Now his arguments of identity... still dumb.
@ 4:15 after 30 days in jail he had no issues saying his name lol @ 26:15 "envelopes are a dollar" lol bidenomics
Sorry, the dog is distracting. If it doesn't add anything, it takes away!
He is actually kinda of smart what a waste
Agreed, I think for not having any legal training, he did fairly good. (It also helps to be polite/cordial and Not antagonize the judge😵💫)
BUT, I also believe it would still be in his best interest (at minimum) to avail himself of a public defender, (at least as second chair), and to set aside any of that Sovereign Citizen BS at least until the conclusion of THIS case.
I wouldn't want to risk YEARS of imprisonment, (or losing many rights/freedoms for felony convictions) based on a "hypothesis/theory" about the legal system.
Especially based on some YT videos about on a subject that many people spend YEARS of their lives learning about, (to just end up being mediocre at doing in the end).🙄😳
I wish him luck with his case and his apparent lack of self control that got him to where he is today. 🤔🙂
Is he though ?
Smart people don't get prison time for stupidity.
Not really, all he did was annoy the judge and then puke out a bunch of excuses that were denied by the prison to exist.
Smart? He still thinks he's on planet Kralox.
@@fluphybunny930as the D&D saying goes: there's a reason intelligence and wisdom are different stats. He's a fool, but likely isn't as dumb as he sounds. One of those rarer cases where if he wasn't sucked into sovcittery he'd probably have made something of himself.
CLICKBAIT!!! Friggin' 30 days for contempt? Fake!!
Corrupt judge being a tyrant. Laughing/smiling is not contempt. Talking back is contempt, but not laughing/smiling.
Whatever annoys the Judge is open to being in contempt I have seen Judges put people in contempt for their clothes, his laughing and smirking shows he doesn’t take this seriously.
bye lyinass
@@annettehottinger6808 You are talking about corrupt and tyrant judges.
@@JohnSmith-ug5ciNo, she's talking about common sense and what she's observed. You're apparently lacking on both of those.
@@nphil1229 you have no clue. You also are a tyrant in spirit.