It’s funny how a couple of months after being cleared of the charges in a legal case that the yacht sinks and his mate gets hit by a car! Corporate hit job???
As a Captain on a commercial vessel, I find the situation strange. In my opinion: 1. If the tornado picked up water then it should have been picked up by the radar. 2. Weather forecast in the MEd is very accurate with high resolution weather models like AROME. They should have looked for better shelter seeing the windspeed and direction. 3. Somebody should have been on watch during the night at this size of vessel. 4. They should have made preparations to reduce ingress of water, etc.
@@renz6913 but not far off ends. Just North of Sicily. I believe since most storms there are from Northerly wind, it still gives good indication what is to come.
Even hus co-defendant died four days before him, in another city. They were both accused of fraud and acquitted. This is very weird. There is something behind those death. It can be spiritual. Can you imagine, he died, the lawyer who defended him die, his co-defendant died, separately in another city, his child died, i believe, the other people were at the wrong place at the wrong time. Sometimes, those people make alliances with the Devil to be rich. Maybe, this, is the time to pay now.cWho knows. The weirdest thing is the fact that his co-defendant also died four days before him and his lawyer.
Another example of the problem with many modern sailing yachts. The traditional full keel, internal ballast hull does not experience this sort of event. Let the racers do what they please with unsafe designs, but keep those designs away from cruising yachts. Ridiculous.
@@vylbird8014you took the thought right out of my head. And I was surprised that the mast is made of aluminum. There are much lighter materials that could have been used. That and the retractable keel taken into consideration and this starts to make a little sense.
They have the ability to cause localised storms now.
2 місяці тому
@@Youalleatmuffins he was hit ny an old man who stopped and rung the police highly unlikely they hired an old man going shopping with his wife for a hit job people get run over every day
Exactly, what's wrong with the good old British seaside? You can't swim in the water anymore thanks to sewage but you can still sit in a deckchair and get sunburned. 😂
how did 15 people escape into a life boat, and the other 6 who were the most important people aboard, not escape. I'd imagine that the crew would go out of their way to rescue Mike Lynch and friends. And it's odd that the most expensive boat in port sinks and no other boats report having been put in desperate straights by the storm. Lots to investigate and sort out. Months of interesting reading ahead if anyone decides to cover the story.
If you think someones gonna go out of their way to save the “important” people in an emergency such as this you have never seen any dramatic situation in your life….
Don't you think that it was mostly the crew that were rescued because maybe they had been roused from their sleep by a general quarters due to the sudden bad weather? The passengers would not be disturbed unless there was imminent danger which happened so quickly that the crew did not have time to alert the passengers so they got caught below when the vessel capsized and sank.
As they had been partying onboard, most of the crew would still be awake, clearing up. The couple with the baby were sleeping on deck. Those sleeping (guests), would have no chance to get out of the cabins, as it happened so fast. The crew are friends of mine, here in Mallorca, this is devastating for them.
As an ocean solo sailor both in the Caribbean and the Mediterranean Sea you see many of these super yachts. One of the most iconic is the Maltese Falcon. Seen by myself in Antigua, Sardinia and recently in Leros in the Aegean. Many have lots of hull openings at the side and the stern. Some are full of what I call rich man’s toys, jet skis ribs and diving equipment etc. firstly why did the boat get knocked down? Huge masts that act like sails. Obviously must of been severe wind speeds being a water spout tornado. Sustained so it couldn’t right itself. Must of been hull hatches openings or hatch failing. With massive ingress of water to sink it so quickly. Didn’t they have watch system with professional crew onboard. What’s causing these storm conditions and tornadoes over the past week in the Mediterranean? It’s climatic conditions with intense heat. Greece with intense heat waves high sea temperatures at depth! This creates intense storm conditions from the high heat of both the sea water and the atmosphere. Planets way of reducing temperature is natural phenomena such as electric storms, intense rain and winds plus water spouts. Natures heat exchanger. Climate change is here and now! Tragic loss of life but should super-yacht sink immediately like that even in storm with high wind conditions?
So in one weekend everyone involved in this case, both defendants, the witness and lawyer in two separate incidents? Sailing experts saying that yacht should not have sunk. Billions to one
It's by no means unknown and this yacht had the tallest aluminium mast of any yacht - exactly not what you need in a thunderstorm. Hulls of composite construction have been known to suffer extensive damage from lightning strikes.
The hypothesis that the lifting keel was up is interesting. I never asked myself what effect that would have on the ultimate stability of a yacht. And it must have a significant effect.
But it wasn't a lifting keel. A crewmember of a systership commented that these yachts have a lifting CENTREBORD. A centrebord does not or only little contribute to the stability of the yacht. The stability is secured by a stubby fixed keel. This crewmember told also that they never used the centrebord down when anchoring because it sending lousy vibrations through the hull. Nevertheless I wonder if a centerbord down would give an momentary, additional stiffness to the stability of the yacht in a sudden microburst. It could be interesting if there is something said in the instructions of the designers or the yard.
This one didn't have a lifting keel. The current hypothesis is that someone "left" the tender platform on on the port side and the bathing platform on the transom open which flooded the engine compartment and destabilised the boat.
I don’t think people understand how insane this is. They all won a case against HP everyone involved died and the one who wasn’t on the boat got killed in a hit and run! That’s mental. Sue the wrong companies and you’ll end up dead
Boeing whistleblowers for 500 anyone? Who’s HPs largest shareholders? Oh funny they happen to be Boeings largest shareholders too. I’ll take BlackRock and Vanguard for 1000 Alex. The kid who tried to assassin Trump was in what commercial? I’ll wait ….
Some of the guests were sleeping on deck in the hot night, which might indicate hatches/doors/retractable windows were open. If rough weather nobody sleeps on deck, indicating the surprise. Retractable keel position, state of mast are unknown. It happened so quickly there was no time to run through the huge boat, lying in the water at an + 90dg angle filling with water, to get everybody out. Absolute nightmare ! RIP !
@@hernanbernal-ki5id Prove it ! How will you sink this massive boat ? How will you time it with the extreme weather? How will you not get caught ? They are gonna lift the boat and insurance, lawyers, experts galore are gonna investigate thoroughly. And prove you wrong ! ;-)
I thought, according to some sources, if you want to avoid tax, then non dom on the seas is the place to be - until you need all the emergency services you don't want to pay tax for of course.
The mast was the tallest in the world apparently, perhaps too tall to take storms because it broke, something faulty in the engineering aspects perhaps. Other yachts in the area didn’t. have the same damage or their masts broken. they were anchored, tall mast being blown by the severe storm when it broke the boat went on it’s side.
@@darlenechandler2403 If the mast broke that would have reduced the windage acting on the boat and it would actually have been safer. Having been in a similar situation myself I reckon I know something about this.
If the vessel was at anchor directly over the top and taunt any swell could be catastrophic. The water intake that capsized the spirit of free enterprise was minimal compared to the size and weight of the vessel. Be interesting to see if the keel is still intact
…at the start of the storm.. when no other yachts or boats or ships sank 😂.. how DUMB do they think we are?! And didn’t his work colleague die about a week ago? 🤔
I don't believe in coincidence, and with Stephen Chamberlain (the partner in crime), getting killed 2 days before whilst out jogging, something smells to me and itnot Roses
*In my learned opinion a a large compressed air balloon/raft used to lift ships of the sea floor was punctured underneath the yacht this reduced the buoyancy of water and capsized it. i tested it using a toy boat and puncturing a balloon submerged underneath it. the ship sank quickly.. i suggest you do it for yourself.*
Not a conspiricy. Any yacht owner expects the wind to be largely on the bow when at anchor. This wind was on the beam and powerful enough to tip the boat with no sails up, All you need then are enough hatches and port holes open. On a hot sticky night ventilation would have been a priority.
@@jonathanwetherell3609but we know now- since Korsika 2022 and Lefkas the year before - that hurrican-force microgusts out of supercells change direction so quick that a yacht on anchor cannot follow immediatly. So the microgust attacks the yacht fully from the side. Yachts should be designed to cope with this. An old gaffer- SIR ROBERT BADEN POWEL- anchoring near BAYESIAN has done this.
The storm was not a surprise, it had been forecast for days. It had been tracking across the med for nearly a week. What is true is that it can come on suddenly, and its exact track changeable, but, any sailor of any worth would know that it was lurking.
Why aren't the survivors being interviewed? They can tell us what happened. Why did so many survive at 5AM in the morning? Did that ridiculously tall mast contribute to the capsizing of the yacht? Foul play needs to be investigated.
No interviews with the captain how odd? I’m a skipper and my theory is that this vessel is very difficult to sink in mild sea despite a water flutes, sails were furled at that time of day giving less resistance to the sudden gust, added to this tragedy, his business dealings are questionable and if you consider who else was on the vessel and who was tragically killed in a car accident? There is always mystery surrounding oligarchs??
The reason why the sinking of this yacht is "unheard of", is because it DIDN'T sink due to bad weather ! Unfortunately we'll never find out the truth just like how MH370 'disappeared'.
That flight was on the way to the US military base island Diago Garcia. Apparently long after the plane went missing there was a phone ping/message from, one of the passengers phone.
Super Yachts are death traps! Should have had water tight bulk heads, there are virtually none ON SUPER YACHTS as the clients want floating salons so the designers win over engineers. Super yachts are floating Salons which are death traps. Shocking how the industry went for easy money to satisfy the ignorant clients as opposed to building a ship.
There was an incident way back in 1899 in my hometown of tacoma Washington. A 335 foot steel hulled 4 masted sailing ship that only a few years old and was of a very good proven design. It was at anchor waiting to load wheat with the holds empty and uncovered, she had huge logs attached by chains on both sides to stabilize her. In a gust of wind one of the chains broke and the ship capsized and immediately sank taking all hands with her. 14 i believe. You can Google the wreck of the ship Andelana in Tacoma Washington in 1898. It happened on new years eve.
@@duanehorton4680 that is why I said at the end of the commet that I'm quite certain it happened on new years eve. If you Google the name and place there's a lot about it. Its a really interesting story.
The crew have to practice abandon ship drills on a monthly basis, so it should have been immediately apparent what was going on and what action they needed to take, plus the crew quarters will be located in a different part of the vessel to the guest cabins so may have had better access to the upper deck and will know intuitively where the emergency escape hatches are located etc. The usual procedure in an emergency is for the crew to muster first and then if necessary round up the guests, obviously there was not time for this as it happened so quick. The last thing a superyacht guest wants is to dragged out of bed every time someone burns some toast and sets off the fire alarm, hence they are investigated by the crew first.
@@bombercountyblues dont you just find it a bit iffy that they beat massive fraud charges in the us against all odds. Then one gets hit by a car and dies and the other in a storm. Within a few days. Could be chance but imagine they beat Russia and it ended like this you’d deffo wonder about it.
@@harrysalt5277 funny how he was involved it AI cyber security and selling companies to America, then beats fraud cases and they defendants all die within a week. My last comment was deleted. But imagine if it was Russia the news here would tell you it was dodgy!
This "expert" that they've wheeled out is a yacht rental and sales broker. This is like using a travel expert, such as simon calder, and asking him to comment on the causes of an aeroplane crash- which they actually have done. What IS IT with the media? They should have asked an experienced Mariner, Salver or boat designer instead.
@paulbishop1695 I wouldn't trouble your already fevered imagination with fanciful notions. Just leave it to those with common sense to work it out for you.
While I understand that the rules that apply to commercially chartered boats are different to those for a privately owned yacht, I find it hard to understand how a crew of ten would be enough to both operate the Bayesian safely while catering to twelve guests. I would imagine that at least three or four of the crew members will have been 'interior crew', dedicated to serving the guests, and that while some of those interior crew may have had deck qualifications, enabling them to double up during docking procedures, or whenever all or most hands were required on deck, leaving the other crew members to operate the boat on a rota-system basis. Whoever was 'officer of the watch' that night would've been tasked with keeping an eye on the weather and crucially, on the boat's position, in order to ensure they weren't dragging their anchor - especially given their proximity to the port and to another boat at anchor. According to the available data, Bayesian's anchorage moved considerably before she capsized, which should've triggered whoever was on watch to alert the captain, who would then presumably have reacted in the same way as the skipper aboard the boat nearby, who rescued the survivors who'd made it into one of the life-rafts. The storm hit incredibly quickly, as shown in CCTV which caught the moment the Bayesian was engulfed. Despite this, the dragging of their anchor should've been enough to ensure the presence of the captain at the helm, who might then have had time to turn on the yacht's engine and loosen the tension of the anchor chain, thereby enabling him to maintain control of the vessel, as the captain of the other boat had managed to do. I suppose, given that the Bayesian was a very modern boat, it could be sailed with very little effort from the crew - sails being either hoisted or lowered at the push of a switch, with navigation done by autopilot, and with far less surface area than a motor yacht needing to be cleaned or maintained, so perhaps the five or six 'exterior' crew members, including the captain, will have been enough to comfortably operate the boat safely, but with twelve passengers aboard, whose safety, along with that of the boat and crew, is their paramount responsibility, just seems to be a highly risky ratio, IMHO.
As an ex crew on Superyachts, I also thought that 10 crew for 56 meters was inadequate. On a 50 meter power yacht some years ago when 60 meters was a very large yacht, we had 16 crew, I was a single handed chef (for the owner, guests and crew I never slept but I was much younger then) and it was only just enough. On my last 70 meter we had 18 plus a chase boat crew. For 12 guests, the interior crew would have been run off their feet with cabins to service, attending to all guests needs during the day into the night, cleaning, laundry, detailing etc. As interior crew you handle fenders in docking and although sailing yachts are different, this Perini is a motor sailor as well. So two engineers, Captain, 1st Officer, Deck Crew, Single handed Chef leaves only 3 interior which I would have said was completely inadequate. Possibly lack of crew quarters but I doubt it. Maybe the owners ran the boat short-handed.
@@andyblyth4519 Exactly as I was thinking, though as a privately-owned sailing yacht, it's possible that one or two of the passengers may have doubled as 'unofficial' crew - the owners, for example - who having sailed on her multiple times previously may have been familiar with the operation of the boat. In any case, I can see how a sailing yacht like the Bayesian could be operated with minimal crew without guests aboard, but when you throw in those twelve guests, the ratio of crew to guests does seem highly inadequate, even with interior crew doubling up and manning fenders. As for two engineers, that's highly unlikely. I would imagine the Bayesian mostly sailed in relatively local waters, for short periods. Given that they were never likely to be too far from a port, they may even have made do without a permanent engineer on board. Counting the skipper, 1st Officer, a Chef, and I'll give you one engineer, that leaves a maximum of three interior crew members and three deckhands, including Bosun or Leading Hand. And given that they'd have to operate a rota system, they'd have to have a minimum of three stewards. So three deckhands, at most, on a 56 meter luxury sailing yacht. By the way, like you I also worked on boats, though that was when I was much younger (I'm 63 now), including on a 'superyacht', a cruise liner, and on a three-masted schooner.
A storm capable of sinking a 180 foot yacht would have destroyed every vessel in the anchorage and the town as well. A waterspout has an average wind speed of 50mph, enough to maybe rip a canopy or two. In order to sink her in 5 minutes there must have been a catastrophic hull breach, on the level of the keel completely detaching, or a bomb going off
If a waterspout has an average of 50 then obviously it could have been 100mph. Even for an hour, it could have overwhelmed the boat with water if lower portholes were open. The boat didn't sink, it was capsized and afloat for hours. People in orange were standing on deck, why weren't they trying to look on lower decks for survivors. Diving equipment on board would be a good option, but probably too dangerous if the boat is at risk of sinking.
When a yacht is very rapidly sinking due to alleged hatch left open and very fast water intake, due to open hatch(es), and maybe more, there likely was no time before it quickly sunk to go to cabins & look for people. Then to get them up to the deck & get into a life raft. It all happened very quickly. Huge water intake suddenly they said.
@@AndreasS.-mh8ti Hatches on sailboats are very small. In order to fill a 180 foot vessel with enough water to sink it in minutes you would need fire hoses pumping hundreds of gallons per minute through the hatches. Remember also that the yacht would have multiple high capacity automatic bilge pumps pumping the water back out. A high-end yacht will likely have alarms signaling excess water in the bilge, giving time for passengers to escape
As an ex jachtsman on yachts smaller than this I find it exceptionally bizarre circumstances. Bizarre things 1. Crew all survived 2. The storm wasn't that bad water spout or not it shouldn't have sunk this ship 3. Passengers sleeping in cabins are not woken and given life vests. (Storm can't have been that bad if they were sleeping?) 4. The speed at which it apparently sunk. (Water tight compartments should have kept it afloat even if capsized) I can't explain it, but it's no wonder why people jump to conspiracies when it's as strange as this. Either some kind of catastrophic failure or what?
Keel raised? Very tall mast creating additional leverage, warm nights, doors and hatches open, only a few hundred metres from shore giving a false sense of security. Occams razor rules.
*In my learned opinion a a large compressed air balloon/raft used to lift ships of the sea floor was punctured underneath the yacht this suddenly reduced the buoyancy of water and capsized it. i tested it using a toy boat and puncturing a balloon submerged underneath it. the ship sank quickly.. i suggest you do it for yourself.*
@@JohnnyMotel99 its been done When the torpedo explodes, it creates a bubble - when the bubble starts to collapse, it happens from the bottom upwards, due to the pressure of the water. This collapsing bubble releases an unbelievable amount of energy, acting like a secondary explosion. If the bubble reaches the surface, it creates a incredibly powerful jet of water that can reach over hundred meters in the air. thousands of times by the navy!!!
If you wanted conditions to capsize and maybe sink it, accidentally raise the keel up during a storm- do safety systems prevent this ? Surely keel all the way down at night in deep water as rocking would have very uncomfortable
The keel retracts in order to bring the yacht into shallow water or for docking. They were not in shallow water. It should have been down. A nice summer day on the Med, who would expect a tornado?
What no one is saying or asking?? There was only one life boat & all crew were able to get in it!!! There was a CRUISE SHIP off South Africa “SINKING” years back!! That crew SAVED THEMSELVES ALSO!!! Left their passengers onboard to die with the sinking ship. It was found out in the middle of the night also.
Come on! The lady driving the car, it got hacked and was driven into the jogger friend. The yacht designed not sink with all the technology, it got hacked too and was jammed to capsize. Remember that they Kcufed with HP (A mega IT company with many defence contracts) and got away with it, or so they thought
I saw a report that this yacht had a retractable keel, common on a lot of yachts. A lot of the ballast was at the base of the keel. You can retract them to allow you into shallow harbours or shallow water but it drastically changes the stability of the ship and shouldn't be done in rough seas or high wind.
@@mikewalker1885 I didn't say it had retracted it's keel, that would be to speculate and that doesn't help. It was in deep water but it wasn't far from shore, was it attempting to make port?
Seems the keel was up leaving just the 4m draught and a higher centre of gravity. Ships with that shape of hull will roll like pigs high waves and from the Mary Rose and Herald of Free Enterprise, it does not take much water to tip a vessel.
2 місяці тому
other boats were damaged check it out eyewitness accounts they were unlucky and caught in the middle of it the storm lasted 2 hours italian weather reported it after the heatwave broke this week plenty of people seen it happen they were just unlucky to be in its path
2 місяці тому+2
check out restaurant footage in the town were it happend reasuarnats were destroyed in porticello
One problem of large rigs is windage, even with no sails. A 20mph wind gives 1lb per sq foot. In a fresh gale at 40mph the wind pressure is 4.1 lb sqft . In a moderate twister of 100mph the wind pressure is 25.6 lbs sqft . This was the sort of event that hit Bayesian. In their write up about the yacht Peri Navi wrote - “To optimise sailing performance of the powerful Cutter Rig sail plan, Salute has modified keel and rudder lines to improve her stability in keeping with the higher centre of gravity the tall mast produces.” Chris Freer - yacht designer
5 am, probably crew was probably asleep, fizzing or just thinking about getting up for the new day. Probably just one person on watch. When the yacht was knocked down, no one had time to think about anything except escape. PS - the vessel was a unique design; perhaps the weight or position of the sails or position of the keel may have contributed to knock down and sinking.
@@williamlloyd3769 It had a heavily ballasted retractable keel that drew 10m when deployed. 4m when retracted. I doubt the keel would be deployed at anchor. It also had an exceptionally tall, and heavily stay mast that gives a new meaning to "bare poles"! I bet it was caught in the waterspot, knocked down and the center of stability reversed and the boat rolled over 180 deg in minutes.
When I saw how tall the mast was, I thought it was too large for this ship. One account said the sail was laying in the water, if I recall it correctly. If that was true, and sails were up, that could easily knock down a ship. Consider: "On May 14, 1986, on her way home from a successful European campaign, _Pride of Baltimore_ was struck by a microburst squall north of Puerto Rico. Within minutes, the schooner sank; the ship, her captain, and three crew members were lost at sea."
Yachts are probably the safest vessels to be in simply because of a long weighted keel that keeps the boat stable and upright in all weather conditions. Its such a big yacht that it would be hard to control; I mean releasing sail when there is strong wind, bringing in sail to reduce sail, etc. And a retractable keel that then makes it like a motorboat and unstable, presumably to get into shallow anchorages!
It was at anchor in 100m+ of water, why retract the keel in that depth? I could understand it if entering a shallow harbour or anchorage, but it wasn't in shallow waters. Not a boat guy, so genuine question.
@@asp38350m of water and the keel draws 9 when down. Apparently they make noise and are uncomfortable when down and on anchor. So it’s common to keep them up and even under sail in light wind.
@@daversj are you saying that the keel fin was 30 feet on this vessel? 1/6th the LOA of the ship? I'm not sure about that. As for making noises, I've never noticed that myself and that's on a vessel half the size of this. This boat would have absolutely every creature comfort and I am trying to think of a legitimate cause of noise coming from a lifting keel that would be louder than the sound of a 'storm.'
All this guy was concerned about was his profit margins. The anxiety in his voice spoke volumes given his profession. According to this guy, nature doesn't exist! We have legs and not fins for a reason. It is a risk you take,regardless of the engineering. Titanic anyone .
This is nothing like titanic though, they used different bearings which were more brittle under cold conditions and completely ignored safety protocol under the dissolution it was unsinkable and powered through a practical ice field just to meet time targets, this was a freak accident
What’s going on? The second defendant with Mike Lynch was also killed last Saturday by a car driver while cycling in Cambridgeshire. There was another yacht not as sophisticated as this that’s still standing, that asked at a rescuer of those overboard. It’s too fishy that two defendants died within days of each other. So so sad!
This wasn't any ordinary Yacht. It had the world's tallest mast that was 75 meters tall. Compare that to a normal sailing yacht's mast like you might take out on the weekend with your family. There isn't any comparison. We are comparing apple's and oranges. How was it designed? How did the mast behave during that storm? Most of us wouldn't be out on the water if the wind is over 30 knots. Most charter captans know this and check the weather reports, sea state before heading out on the water. A ship of this size and complexity is going to have it's own radar and access to the latest weather maps.
My thought also. never visit Sicily just days after you win a major court case against a Mega Corporation. The lawyer and the owner both had many enemies. lawyer was DA for the infamous Souther District of New York - the same that is railroading Donald Trump
It's not unheard of that a big yacht is knocked down, a slightly smaller yacht was knocked down towards 90 degrees in Auckland. There's video of the event so its not unheard of.
@@darlenechandler2403 lynch’s wife owns the super yacht (which sank) through a company she controls/owns but she does not own Burgess Yachts who are unrelated.
It's Italy and they're in the midst of an investigation. Maybe they aren't permitted to speak publicly at this time. Not all countries are like the US with press vultures at their doors harassing them.
They said the Titanic was unsinkable. How can you say it’s unheard of. They’ve got a nearly 300 foot mast massive sails that was hit by a tornado it’s gonna go over
The captain and crew survived. They in charge to safeguard their guests, ultimately the captain. Why did the captain abandon the ship fully knowing there are people left behind? That is outrageous.
I was really surprised having watched my little brother paddling around in a 6ft rubber dingy and a decently sized waterspout passed right over him. The video of this tragedy shows very stormy and windy conditions that would make it hard to see the spout. The many I have seen occured under large storm clouds before rain and wind.
It tipped over too far in the typhoon and all the water came in. Perhaps if the windows and doors were shut it would have been ok, It is summer, it is hot and my guess is doors and windows were open.
Got knocked on its side , water got in , couldn't right itself , more water in , down she goes. Another ship in front got knocked on her side and then rerighted herself. Bayesium couldn't reright as mast so big , too much mass to lift out of water.
edgallad, so a poor person would have the wherewithal to own this cheap family runabout??
2 місяці тому+4
you need rich people whether we like it or not i am skint, my mate is a milionaire he owns a roofing company doing building complexes but he employs 34 regular roofers.so he creates jobs and taxes he goes away at leat 6 times a year on holiday thats the way it is but he has worked for it
This happening to a large sailing vessel is NOT unheard of. There was a similar incident in Auckland, NZ a few years ago which, by pure luck did not result in a sinking, though the boat was laid over with the mast in the water.
Didnt his mate , partner in crime just get killed on his bicycle by a car , like a week ago , , also 15 people in the liferaft , but not the primary guest owner … Also at this point they could still be alive …
Hm. His colleague passes, he thinks "What an opportune time to take a cruise on a boat my wife's company owns!" Then a storm occurs that didn't affect the nearby pontoon boats and those involved in the case haven't been found dead but mysteriously disappear. 🤔 Follow the money. His, hers, the companies and their adjuncts.
The other boats in the harbour were not a "show-off" yacht with an overly tall mast and a retractable keel. Most unstable boat there got hit by a water spout.
Absolutely right - he was the most honest & accurate commentator. As the days have gone on and information coming through I am not buying it. A modern yacht that has sailed over the Atlantic goes down in freak weather? Eye witness events? The other sail boat didn't get affected? My daughter works on super yachts. The crew are highly trained, they would go through regular safety training, everything is logged in the main log & crew log books. There is something fishy here - excuse the pun but these expensive boats are built & crewed to exceptionally high standards. Coincidence that all those involved in a lawsuit are now dead and the work Mike Lynch was heading up will now be in jeopardy which is rather convenient for some
Actually not. Explained elsewhere that likely the keel was retracted which raised the center of mass and with that tall mast the storm just blew her over. And, likely hatches and ports were open causing the vessel to quickly sink. Good info here: ua-cam.com/video/ovcOgJweuOc/v-deo.htmlsi=xdnXCWsbBRLHF9KM
at 3:58 "these vessels are all professionally crewed" WHY would your claim be true? maybe it was. maybe yacht-guy was lying. (are you claiming that "tall mast" had her sail up? ALSO: why would she have her keel retracted? real question, what was the explanation by "explained elsewhere"?)
@@smithbrownjones yeah. but the boat seller is the one pushing that, not me. ("professionally crewed" is OBVIOUSLY setting up a legal defense for his product)
This yacht was designed with a lifting keel. It would be lowered for sailing and raised for entering port. If the yacht was still under sail while the keel was in the raised position it could have an effect on the stability of the yacht. It will be interesting to see what position this keel was in at the time of the accident.
Listen to Times Radio for the latest updates www.thetimes.com/radio 📻
It’s funny how a couple of months after being cleared of the charges in a legal case that the yacht sinks and his mate gets hit by a car! Corporate hit job???
no, it was hit by a waterspout and there were witnesses who tried to help immediately. stop the bs.
This is how conspiracies start.
People just looking for alternative answers when its right in front of you.
Tornado and car accident.
You're about the millionth person to make the same boring point and you aren't as intelligent as you think you are.
I think so too
@@jordizee ahahahahah
As a Captain on a commercial vessel, I find the situation strange. In my opinion: 1. If the tornado picked up water then it should have been picked up by the radar. 2. Weather forecast in the MEd is very accurate with high resolution weather models like AROME. They should have looked for better shelter seeing the windspeed and direction. 3. Somebody should have been on watch during the night at this size of vessel. 4. They should have made preparations to reduce ingress of water, etc.
Adam fair point and aligned with you but as skipper just willing to mention Arôme is not covering this area
@@renz6913 but not far off ends. Just North of Sicily. I believe since most storms there are from Northerly wind, it still gives good indication what is to come.
Stevie wonder could see there is something altogether going on here ffs.
Even hus co-defendant died four days before him, in another city. They were both accused of fraud and acquitted. This is very weird. There is something behind those death. It can be spiritual. Can you imagine, he died, the lawyer who defended him die, his co-defendant died, separately in another city, his child died, i believe, the other people were at the wrong place at the wrong time. Sometimes, those people make alliances with the Devil to be rich. Maybe, this, is the time to pay now.cWho knows. The weirdest thing is the fact that his co-defendant also died four days before him and his lawyer.
Another example of the problem with many modern sailing yachts. The traditional full keel, internal ballast hull does not experience this sort of event. Let the racers do what they please with unsafe designs, but keep those designs away from cruising yachts. Ridiculous.
My yacht was a full kneel. I am still here.
@@freeagent8225 Have you been broadsided with a waterspout or its gust font at anchor with your keel retracted?
The beauty and safety of a full keel is that it cannot be retracted.
Also the mast was stupidly tall for no real reason - it was just extended dangerously high for bragging rights.
@@vylbird8014you took the thought right out of my head. And I was surprised that the mast is made of aluminum. There are much lighter materials that could have been used. That and the retractable keel taken into consideration and this starts to make a little sense.
His co-defendant also was tragically killed in a car accident on the same day/week. I wonder if there's foul play.
💯 way too coincidental
@@Youalleatmuffins What would Bayes say? what are the weighted probabilities?
They have the ability to cause localised storms now.
@@Youalleatmuffins he was hit ny an old man who stopped and rung the police highly unlikely they hired an old man going shopping with his wife for a hit job people get run over every day
whoever they are lol
If they just went up to the Caravan none of this would’ve happened.
Tell that to texans or anyone in the mid west, I’ve watched twister!
I'm sure Skegness would have been much safer
@@mancunianinlondon most definitely I think that’s where Bill Gates has his van.
Tell that to his co-defendant who was run over
Exactly, what's wrong with the good old British seaside? You can't swim in the water anymore thanks to sewage but you can still sit in a deckchair and get sunburned. 😂
They have been sunk, obviously. The question is why and by whom.
like in Cludo you mean, It was Colonel Plum in the ballroom with the lead pipe. . .
Follow the money. That’s always the way to know
You mean an attacker has created a massive waterspout and thrown it on the yacht to make it sink? Sounds very probably....
how did 15 people escape into a life boat, and the other 6 who were the most important people aboard, not escape. I'd imagine that the crew would go out of their way to rescue Mike Lynch and friends. And it's odd that the most expensive boat in port sinks and no other boats report having been put in desperate straights by the storm. Lots to investigate and sort out. Months of interesting reading ahead if anyone decides to cover the story.
If you think someones gonna go out of their way to save the “important” people in an emergency such as this you have never seen any dramatic situation in your life….
I think everything happened so quickly I would imagine a lot of panicking people typically don’t think straight under such circumstances
@@SoAnesuAre you suggesting that thinking straight means putting the life of your employer over you own?
Don't you think that it was mostly the crew that were rescued because maybe they had been roused from their sleep by a general quarters due to the sudden bad weather? The passengers would not be disturbed unless there was imminent danger which happened so quickly that the crew did not have time to alert the passengers so they got caught below when the vessel capsized and sank.
As they had been partying onboard, most of the crew would still be awake, clearing up. The couple with the baby were sleeping on deck. Those sleeping (guests), would have no chance to get out of the cabins, as it happened so fast.
The crew are friends of mine, here in Mallorca, this is devastating for them.
Suspicious to say the least.
Coincidence, nothing suspicious about a tornado.
As an ocean solo sailor both in the Caribbean and the Mediterranean Sea you see many of these super yachts. One of the most iconic is the Maltese Falcon. Seen by myself in Antigua, Sardinia and recently in Leros in the Aegean. Many have lots of hull openings at the side and the stern. Some are full of what I call rich man’s toys, jet skis ribs and diving equipment etc. firstly why did the boat get knocked down? Huge masts that act like sails. Obviously must of been severe wind speeds being a water spout tornado. Sustained so it couldn’t right itself. Must of been hull hatches openings or hatch failing. With massive ingress of water to sink it so quickly. Didn’t they have watch system with professional crew onboard.
What’s causing these storm conditions and tornadoes over the past week in the Mediterranean? It’s climatic conditions with intense heat. Greece with intense heat waves high sea temperatures at depth! This creates intense storm conditions from the high heat of both the sea water and the atmosphere.
Planets way of reducing temperature is natural phenomena such as electric storms, intense rain and winds plus water spouts. Natures heat exchanger. Climate change is here and now!
Tragic loss of life but should super-yacht sink immediately like that even in storm with high wind conditions?
Check the increased activity of the Sun recently, there is your climate change.
wat BS they were KILLED like his CO Defendant
something fishy pardon the punt
Perhaps it is best everyone stays quiet and does not share their premonitions. It is evident this may not be an accident.
Did you think Brexit was a good idea too?
@@WellbeingToPeace like i said very fishy
@@ohdearism wats this got to do wit the shity Brexit
It was not a hit and run. It was a woman who stayed at the accident scene until the police arrived.
So in one weekend everyone involved in this case, both defendants, the witness and lawyer in two separate incidents?
Sailing experts saying that yacht should not have sunk. Billions to one
How the heck does lightning sink a yacht? Fire? No fire extinguishers?This reminds me of Robert Maxwell going for a little swim...
Tornado over sea.
Lightning can cause a hole in the bottom of a yacht, but the bilges should be able to keep the yacht afloat, except if there is a power failure
I remember someone saying that the last time they saw him he looked very Bouyant.
Maxwell that is.
It's by no means unknown and this yacht had the tallest aluminium mast of any yacht - exactly not what you need in a thunderstorm. Hulls of composite construction have been known to suffer extensive damage from lightning strikes.
Hewlett Packard hitman bro
The Keel: Have divers found it in the raised or lowered position? This is the essence.
I heard the kneel, it was in mid position on the bottom of the ocean
Cleared of charges, Yacht sinks.
And another one involved in this case had a fatal accident on his motorbike a couple of days prior. Hmmm.
The Guilty charge in the UK will still stand
56 metre yacht sinks,Yeah this stinks !!!
The hypothesis that the lifting keel was up is interesting. I never asked myself what effect that would have on the ultimate stability of a yacht. And it must have a significant effect.
But it wasn't a lifting keel. A crewmember of a systership commented that these yachts have a lifting CENTREBORD. A centrebord does not or only little contribute to the stability of the yacht. The stability is secured by a stubby fixed keel.
This crewmember told also that they never used the centrebord down when anchoring because it sending lousy vibrations through the hull.
Nevertheless I wonder if a centerbord down would give an momentary, additional stiffness to the stability of the yacht in a sudden microburst.
It could be interesting if there is something said in the instructions of the designers or the yard.
This one didn't have a lifting keel. The current hypothesis is that someone "left" the tender platform on on the port side and the bathing platform on the transom open which flooded the engine compartment and destabilised the boat.
I don’t think people understand how insane this is. They all won a case against HP everyone involved died and the one who wasn’t on the boat got killed in a hit and run! That’s mental. Sue the wrong companies and you’ll end up dead
You're not allowed to say anything like this. You'll be labelled a flat earther, conspiracy theorist.
@@mikewalker1885 that’s true 🤣
If that is true that all were involved in the trial and all decided to go on a sail about Scically all now missing that's too coincidental .
@@karenohanlon4183 and the only person that never got killed in a hit and run accident! Scary right!
Boeing whistleblowers for 500 anyone? Who’s HPs largest shareholders? Oh funny they happen to be Boeings largest shareholders too. I’ll take BlackRock and Vanguard for 1000 Alex. The kid who tried to assassin Trump was in what commercial? I’ll wait ….
Some of the guests were sleeping on deck in the hot night, which might indicate hatches/doors/retractable windows were open. If rough weather nobody sleeps on deck, indicating the surprise. Retractable keel position, state of mast are unknown. It happened so quickly there was no time to run through the huge boat, lying in the water at an + 90dg angle filling with water, to get everybody out. Absolute nightmare ! RIP !
No air conditioning????
Esto fue una conspiración 😢
@@hernanbernal-ki5id Prove it ! How will you sink this massive boat ? How will you time it with the extreme weather? How will you not get caught ? They are gonna lift the boat and insurance, lawyers, experts galore are gonna investigate thoroughly. And prove you wrong ! ;-)
@@candacepost2137it’s horrible best with fresh air
Someone with common sense here making a comment!
the sea gods have a thing for billionaires lately
Go team Orca !!!
Haha
MEGADON i honestiy hope they safe tho !
And Baths.
I thought, according to some sources, if you want to avoid tax, then non dom on the seas is the place to be - until you need all the emergency services you don't want to pay tax for of course.
Maybe a lifting keel on a vessel that large is a bad idea in severe weather?
Except it didn’t have one. Apart from that spot on…
The mast was the tallest in the world apparently, perhaps too tall to take storms because it broke, something faulty in the engineering aspects perhaps. Other yachts in the area didn’t. have the same damage or their masts broken. they were anchored, tall mast being blown by the severe storm when it broke the boat went on it’s side.
@@Cassp0nkGet your facts right it did have a retractable keel.
@@darlenechandler2403 If the mast broke that would have reduced the windage acting on the boat and it would actually have been safer. Having been in a similar situation myself I reckon I know something about this.
@@Cassp0nkcouldn't sail without one!
If the vessel was at anchor directly over the top and taunt any swell could be catastrophic. The water intake that capsized the spirit of free enterprise was minimal compared to the size and weight of the vessel.
Be interesting to see if the keel is still intact
…at the start of the storm.. when no other yachts or boats or ships sank 😂.. how DUMB do they think we are?! And didn’t his work colleague die about a week ago? 🤔
I know what you mean but there was a storm. You can't order a storm from Amazon.
His codefendant in the trial was killed in a road traffic "accident"........on the same day 😮
@@bebobbebob8275😂😂
@@mikewalker1885it wasn't the same day at all.
Same day!
I don't believe in coincidence, and with Stephen Chamberlain (the partner in crime), getting killed 2 days before whilst out jogging, something smells to me and itnot Roses
*In my learned opinion a a large compressed air balloon/raft used to lift ships of the sea floor was punctured underneath the yacht this reduced the buoyancy of water and capsized it. i tested it using a toy boat and puncturing a balloon submerged underneath it. the ship sank quickly.. i suggest you do it for yourself.*
So you think Hewlett Packard engineered a storm in the med complete with a waterspout? If they're so smart why are their printers so bad?
@@dub604 lol
Not a conspiricy. Any yacht owner expects the wind to be largely on the bow when at anchor. This wind was on the beam and powerful enough to tip the boat with no sails up, All you need then are enough hatches and port holes open. On a hot sticky night ventilation would have been a priority.
@@jonathanwetherell3609but we know now- since Korsika 2022 and Lefkas the year before - that hurrican-force microgusts out of supercells change direction so quick that a yacht on anchor cannot follow immediatly. So the microgust attacks the yacht fully from the side. Yachts should be designed to cope with this.
An old gaffer- SIR ROBERT BADEN POWEL- anchoring near BAYESIAN has done this.
The storm was not a surprise, it had been forecast for days. It had been tracking across the med for nearly a week. What is true is that it can come on suddenly, and its exact track changeable, but, any sailor of any worth would know that it was lurking.
Something fishy 😅
Always at sea…
Oh you mean it was the “ unsinkable “ like the titanic 🤣😂😂🤣
Not much has changed in 112 years, humanity is still clueless
The Olympic not the Titanic. It was all another scam 😔 important people died like the astors who were going against the federal reserve
Exactly 💯 %
Why aren't the survivors being interviewed? They can tell us what happened. Why did so many survive at 5AM in the morning? Did that ridiculously tall mast contribute to the capsizing of the yacht? Foul play needs to be investigated.
It is creepy his co accused got hit by a car did the driver stop and died a bit sus
No mate the car was hit by a tornado 🌪️
It's ironic how his co-defendant in his trial got ran over and killed and now this.. makes you wonder really what happened.
No interviews with the captain how odd? I’m a skipper and my theory is that this vessel is very difficult to sink in mild sea despite a water flutes, sails were furled at that time of day giving less resistance to the sudden gust, added to this tragedy, his business dealings are questionable and if you consider who else was on the vessel and who was tragically killed in a car accident? There is always mystery surrounding oligarchs??
The reason why the sinking of this yacht is "unheard of", is because it DIDN'T sink due to bad weather ! Unfortunately we'll never find out the truth just like how MH370 'disappeared'.
That flight was on the way to the US military base island Diago Garcia. Apparently long after the plane went missing there was a phone ping/message from, one of the passengers phone.
Super Yachts are death traps! Should have had water tight bulk heads, there are virtually none ON SUPER YACHTS as the clients want floating salons so the designers win over engineers. Super yachts are floating Salons which are death traps. Shocking how the industry went for easy money to satisfy the ignorant clients as opposed to building a ship.
Do not trust this
The Titanic was also designed as unsinkable even God cannot sink it ..... and then it sunk ..... and the real truth has still not emerged !
And his mate got ran over!!!!!very odd!!!!!!
Yes, the old woman who knocked him down was actually being mind-controlled by 5G towers
Allegedly
#RobertMaxwell
@@CosmicSeeker69No factually. Stephen Chamberlain was hit by a car and subsequently died.
There was an incident way back in 1899 in my hometown of tacoma Washington. A 335 foot steel hulled 4 masted sailing ship that only a few years old and was of a very good proven design. It was at anchor waiting to load wheat with the holds empty and uncovered, she had huge logs attached by chains on both sides to stabilize her. In a gust of wind one of the chains broke and the ship capsized and immediately sank taking all hands with her. 14 i believe. You can Google the wreck of the ship Andelana in Tacoma Washington in 1898. It happened on new years eve.
So which is it, 1898 or 1899?
@@duanehorton4680 that is why I said at the end of the commet that I'm quite certain it happened on new years eve. If you Google the name and place there's a lot about it. Its a really interesting story.
Taken out.
Interesting that all the crew except the Chef survived 😮
The crew have to practice abandon ship drills on a monthly basis, so it should have been immediately apparent what was going on and what action they needed to take, plus the crew quarters will be located in a different part of the vessel to the guest cabins so may have had better access to the upper deck and will know intuitively where the emergency escape hatches are located etc. The usual procedure in an emergency is for the crew to muster first and then if necessary round up the guests, obviously there was not time for this as it happened so quick. The last thing a superyacht guest wants is to dragged out of bed every time someone burns some toast and sets off the fire alarm, hence they are investigated by the crew first.
This doesn’t happen when you go to butlins
You've never been to Southport then 😂👍
@@whitecompany18🙈
If the governments can make it rain, could they make a storm?
Oh lawd you chemtrail wackos are still spewing😂
And get it to hit one particular boat, while missing others?... No!
@@bombercountybluesman thats lightwork we have far more advanced tehcnogly than that
@@bombercountyblues dont you just find it a bit iffy that they beat massive fraud charges in the us against all odds.
Then one gets hit by a car and dies and the other in a storm. Within a few days.
Could be chance but imagine they beat Russia and it ended like this you’d deffo wonder about it.
@@harrysalt5277 funny how he was involved it AI cyber security and selling companies to America, then beats fraud cases and they defendants all die within a week.
My last comment was deleted. But imagine if it was Russia the news here would tell you it was dodgy!
This "expert" that they've wheeled out is a yacht rental and sales broker. This is like using a travel expert, such as simon calder, and asking him to comment on the causes of an aeroplane crash- which they actually have done.
What IS IT with the media? They should have asked an experienced Mariner, Salver or boat designer instead.
Shocked they didn’t ask Alistair Campbell..he normally wheeled out by msm ..for spite purposes.
Does Mrs. Lynch own the boat company or was I hearing that right.
@@darlenechandler2403 it is common for a large yacht to be owned by a company rather than an individual. This is primarily for tax purposes.
hmm his partner in crime died in a car crash Just excaped a 11billion fraud charge.
he wasnt a fraud tho?
@@Enhancedlies Oj simpson was found not guilty too.
excaped? 😂
@@VladimirthetinyI'm guessing he says "Axed" instead of 'asked' too.... 😆🤣
@paulbishop1695 I wouldn't trouble your already fevered imagination with fanciful notions. Just leave it to those with common sense to work it out for you.
56 metres length?!! 😮 That would be better described as a ship no?
Very sad. 😢
While I understand that the rules that apply to commercially chartered boats are different to those for a privately owned yacht, I find it hard to understand how a crew of ten would be enough to both operate the Bayesian safely while catering to twelve guests. I would imagine that at least three or four of the crew members will have been 'interior crew', dedicated to serving the guests, and that while some of those interior crew may have had deck qualifications, enabling them to double up during docking procedures, or whenever all or most hands were required on deck, leaving the other crew members to operate the boat on a rota-system basis. Whoever was 'officer of the watch' that night would've been tasked with keeping an eye on the weather and crucially, on the boat's position, in order to ensure they weren't dragging their anchor - especially given their proximity to the port and to another boat at anchor. According to the available data, Bayesian's anchorage moved considerably before she capsized, which should've triggered whoever was on watch to alert the captain, who would then presumably have reacted in the same way as the skipper aboard the boat nearby, who rescued the survivors who'd made it into one of the life-rafts. The storm hit incredibly quickly, as shown in CCTV which caught the moment the Bayesian was engulfed. Despite this, the dragging of their anchor should've been enough to ensure the presence of the captain at the helm, who might then have had time to turn on the yacht's engine and loosen the tension of the anchor chain, thereby enabling him to maintain control of the vessel, as the captain of the other boat had managed to do. I suppose, given that the Bayesian was a very modern boat, it could be sailed with very little effort from the crew - sails being either hoisted or lowered at the push of a switch, with navigation done by autopilot, and with far less surface area than a motor yacht needing to be cleaned or maintained, so perhaps the five or six 'exterior' crew members, including the captain, will have been enough to comfortably operate the boat safely, but with twelve passengers aboard, whose safety, along with that of the boat and crew, is their paramount responsibility, just seems to be a highly risky ratio, IMHO.
As an ex crew on Superyachts, I also thought that 10 crew for 56 meters was inadequate. On a 50 meter power yacht some years ago when 60 meters was a very large yacht, we had 16 crew, I was a single handed chef (for the owner, guests and crew I never slept but I was much younger then) and it was only just enough. On my last 70 meter we had 18 plus a chase boat crew. For 12 guests, the interior crew would have been run off their feet with cabins to service, attending to all guests needs during the day into the night, cleaning, laundry, detailing etc. As interior crew you handle fenders in docking and although sailing yachts are different, this Perini is a motor sailor as well. So two engineers, Captain, 1st Officer, Deck Crew, Single handed Chef leaves only 3 interior which I would have said was completely inadequate. Possibly lack of crew quarters but I doubt it. Maybe the owners ran the boat short-handed.
@@andyblyth4519 Exactly as I was thinking, though as a privately-owned sailing yacht, it's possible that one or two of the passengers may have doubled as 'unofficial' crew - the owners, for example - who having sailed on her multiple times previously may have been familiar with the operation of the boat. In any case, I can see how a sailing yacht like the Bayesian could be operated with minimal crew without guests aboard, but when you throw in those twelve guests, the ratio of crew to guests does seem highly inadequate, even with interior crew doubling up and manning fenders. As for two engineers, that's highly unlikely. I would imagine the Bayesian mostly sailed in relatively local waters, for short periods. Given that they were never likely to be too far from a port, they may even have made do without a permanent engineer on board. Counting the skipper, 1st Officer, a Chef, and I'll give you one engineer, that leaves a maximum of three interior crew members and three deckhands, including Bosun or Leading Hand. And given that they'd have to operate a rota system, they'd have to have a minimum of three stewards. So three deckhands, at most, on a 56 meter luxury sailing yacht.
By the way, like you I also worked on boats, though that was when I was much younger (I'm 63 now), including on a 'superyacht', a cruise liner, and on a three-masted schooner.
A storm capable of sinking a 180 foot yacht would have destroyed every vessel in the anchorage and the town as well. A waterspout has an average wind speed of 50mph, enough to maybe rip a canopy or two. In order to sink her in 5 minutes there must have been a catastrophic hull breach, on the level of the keel completely detaching, or a bomb going off
The guy who owns the yacht was a fierce critic of covid vaccines. He was silenced by our president Keith Starmer 😢
If a waterspout has an average of 50 then obviously it could have been 100mph.
Even for an hour, it could have overwhelmed the boat with water if lower portholes were open. The boat didn't sink, it was capsized and afloat for hours.
People in orange were standing on deck, why weren't they trying to look on lower decks for survivors.
Diving equipment on board would be a good option, but probably too dangerous if the boat is at risk of sinking.
@@onecupof_tea where was his helicopter
When a yacht is very rapidly sinking due to alleged hatch left open and very fast water intake, due to open hatch(es), and maybe more, there likely was no time before it quickly sunk to go to cabins & look for people. Then to get them up to the deck & get into a life raft. It all happened very quickly. Huge water intake suddenly they said.
@@AndreasS.-mh8ti Hatches on sailboats are very small. In order to fill a 180 foot vessel with enough water to sink it in minutes you would need fire hoses pumping hundreds of gallons per minute through the hatches. Remember also that the yacht would have multiple high capacity automatic bilge pumps pumping the water back out. A high-end yacht will likely have alarms signaling excess water in the bilge, giving time for passengers to escape
As an ex jachtsman on yachts smaller than this I find it exceptionally bizarre circumstances. Bizarre things 1. Crew all survived 2. The storm wasn't that bad water spout or not it shouldn't have sunk this ship 3. Passengers sleeping in cabins are not woken and given life vests. (Storm can't have been that bad if they were sleeping?) 4. The speed at which it apparently sunk. (Water tight compartments should have kept it afloat even if capsized) I can't explain it, but it's no wonder why people jump to conspiracies when it's as strange as this. Either some kind of catastrophic failure or what?
Keel raised? Very tall mast creating additional leverage, warm nights, doors and hatches open, only a few hundred metres from shore giving a false sense of security. Occams razor rules.
*In my learned opinion a a large compressed air balloon/raft used to lift ships of the sea floor was punctured underneath the yacht this suddenly reduced the buoyancy of water and capsized it. i tested it using a toy boat and puncturing a balloon submerged underneath it. the ship sank quickly.. i suggest you do it for yourself.*
@@esecallum Can I just say that 'opinions' rarely meet reality...
@@JohnnyMotel99 its been done When the torpedo explodes, it creates a bubble - when the bubble starts to collapse, it happens from the bottom upwards, due to the pressure of the water. This collapsing bubble releases an unbelievable amount of energy, acting like a secondary explosion.
If the bubble reaches the surface, it creates a incredibly powerful jet of water that can reach over hundred meters in the air. thousands of times by the navy!!!
@@esecallum I agree it was the explosion from a torpedo that sunk this yacht, makes total sense😳
If you wanted conditions to capsize and maybe sink it, accidentally raise the keel up during a storm- do safety systems prevent this ? Surely keel all the way down at night in deep water as rocking would have very uncomfortable
I think that the keel must have been up and that is why they capsized. If that is the case then the captain should be charged with negligent homicide
Not necessarily. If you're at anchor and not underway, it's common to raise the keel on this type of vessel. @@tanyalove6983
@@tanyalove6983
Calm down Tanya. You have no idea what the operating procedures are on a superyacht.
In the news today, it said perhaps the hatches were left open and the storm hit and cause the yacht to sink after mast got broken.
The keel retracts in order to bring the yacht into shallow water or for docking. They were not in shallow water. It should have been down. A nice summer day on the Med, who would expect a tornado?
What no one is saying or asking?? There was only one life boat & all crew were able to get in it!!! There was a CRUISE SHIP off South Africa “SINKING” years back!! That crew SAVED THEMSELVES ALSO!!! Left their passengers onboard to die with the sinking ship. It was found out in the middle of the night also.
Come on! The lady driving the car, it got hacked and was driven into the jogger friend. The yacht designed not sink with all the technology, it got hacked too and was jammed to capsize. Remember that they Kcufed with HP (A mega IT company with many defence contracts) and got away with it, or so they thought
aha yes similar to that journalist in LA Michael Hastings in his Mercedes, I think a few famous people have had unusual accidents in cars.
You r correct , something fishy going down here , U heard it here first , I wonder was the boat on HP , 😮
A yacht designed not to sink?? They said the titanic was unsinkable and we all know what happened in the end. IT SUNK
@@jake751all boats are designed not to sink! Some better than others. It does not mean they won't sink.
Sure, ‘shouldn’t have happened’. It was an event with a low probability of happening. It happened. The person who named that yacht would get that.
The very tall mast seems unnecessary.
BIG BOAT NEED BIG MASTS
Big keel too.
I’m sure that it was all just for show, and not a vital and integral part of the boat.
can only see tall mast for larger sails for speed maybe?
I saw a report that this yacht had a retractable keel, common on a lot of yachts.
A lot of the ballast was at the base of the keel.
You can retract them to allow you into shallow harbours or shallow water but it drastically changes the stability of the ship and shouldn't be done in rough seas or high wind.
Shallow water? It's 150ft deep !
@@mikewalker1885 I didn't say it had retracted it's keel, that would be to speculate and that doesn't help.
It was in deep water but it wasn't far from shore, was it attempting to make port?
Why was the super yacht the only boat to sink, all other boats untouched. SPOOKY!
very fishy.
Seems the keel was up leaving just the 4m draught and a higher centre of gravity. Ships with that shape of hull will roll like pigs high waves and from the Mary Rose and Herald of Free Enterprise, it does not take much water to tip a vessel.
other boats were damaged check it out eyewitness accounts they were unlucky and caught in the middle of it the storm lasted 2 hours italian weather reported it after the heatwave broke this week plenty of people seen it happen they were just unlucky to be in its path
check out restaurant footage in the town were it happend reasuarnats were destroyed in porticello
It was anchored 500 metres offshore, not in a sheltered bay.
Let’s bet they never find the tycoon body 🤔
Interesting comment
I dont think the bodies will ever be found.
Sounds bizarre that these folk were sleeping through a water spout.
Nothing to see here. Just all a big coincidence. 1:10000000000 chance to happen this way
And if you add in the probabIlity of his co defendant dying in another accident 2 days before the odds are even more incredible
BAYESIAN.....
One problem of large rigs is windage, even with no sails. A 20mph wind gives 1lb per sq foot. In a fresh gale at 40mph the wind pressure is 4.1 lb sqft . In a moderate twister of 100mph the wind pressure is 25.6 lbs sqft . This was the sort of event that hit Bayesian.
In their write up about the yacht Peri Navi wrote - “To optimise sailing performance of the powerful Cutter Rig sail plan, Salute has modified keel and rudder lines to improve her stability in keeping with the higher centre of gravity the tall mast produces.” Chris Freer - yacht designer
I haven't cried this hard since Oceangate 😭 🤧
Fer f sake,,the captain and crew have been ashore for hours now,,how come nothing intelligent is coming from them ???,,
Because Italian magistrates are conducting an investigation and told the survivors not to speak to the Press.
Maybe they’re not intelligent
5 am, probably crew was probably asleep, fizzing or just thinking about getting up for the new day. Probably just one person on watch. When the yacht was knocked down, no one had time to think about anything except escape.
PS - the vessel was a unique design; perhaps the weight or position of the sails or position of the keel may have contributed to knock down and sinking.
@@williamlloyd3769 It had a heavily ballasted retractable keel that drew 10m when deployed. 4m when retracted. I doubt the keel would be deployed at anchor. It also had an exceptionally tall, and heavily stay mast that gives a new meaning to "bare poles"! I bet it was caught in the waterspot, knocked down and the center of stability reversed and the boat rolled over 180 deg in minutes.
Crew got out but passengers didn’t?
Is this a PR damage control exercise for this guys company or an anlyasis and an explanation of what happened?
He’s a yacht broker, buys and sells, he doesn’t work for the builder or designer. He’s just giving an informed opinion as he works in the industry.
Analysis, not anlyasis.
When I saw how tall the mast was, I thought it was too large for this ship. One account said the sail was laying in the water, if I recall it correctly. If that was true, and sails were up, that could easily knock down a ship. Consider: "On May 14, 1986, on her way home from a successful European campaign, _Pride of Baltimore_ was struck by a microburst squall north of Puerto Rico. Within minutes, the schooner sank; the ship, her captain, and three crew members were lost at sea."
Yachts are probably the safest vessels to be in simply because of a long weighted keel that keeps the boat stable and upright in all weather conditions. Its such a big yacht that it would be hard to control; I mean releasing sail when there is strong wind, bringing in sail to reduce sail, etc. And a retractable keel that then makes it like a motorboat and unstable, presumably to get into shallow anchorages!
It was at anchor in 100m+ of water, why retract the keel in that depth? I could understand it if entering a shallow harbour or anchorage, but it wasn't in shallow waters. Not a boat guy, so genuine question.
@@asp38350m of water and the keel draws 9 when down. Apparently they make noise and are uncomfortable when down and on anchor. So it’s common to keep them up and even under sail in light wind.
@@daversj Thanks for the reply.
@@daversj are you saying that the keel fin was 30 feet on this vessel? 1/6th the LOA of the ship? I'm not sure about that. As for making noises, I've never noticed that myself and that's on a vessel half the size of this. This boat would have absolutely every creature comfort and I am trying to think of a legitimate cause of noise coming from a lifting keel that would be louder than the sound of a 'storm.'
All this guy was concerned about was his profit margins. The anxiety in his voice spoke volumes given his profession. According to this guy, nature doesn't exist! We have legs and not fins for a reason. It is a risk you take,regardless of the engineering. Titanic anyone .
What?
yeah we have legs not wheels, so we shouldn't be driving around in cars either mmm'ok o_O
@@hewitsonp yep
@hewitsonp it is a risk you take . If you can understand my comment, rather than fuel! Your ego.
This is nothing like titanic though, they used different bearings which were more brittle under cold conditions and completely ignored safety protocol under the dissolution it was unsinkable and powered through a practical ice field just to meet time targets, this was a freak accident
There’s been a lot of this in recent years! Unbelievable occurrences ! Strange coincidences ,, 😊
What’s going on? The second defendant with Mike Lynch was also killed last Saturday by a car driver while cycling in Cambridgeshire. There was another yacht not as sophisticated as this that’s still standing, that asked at a rescuer of those overboard. It’s too fishy that two defendants died within days of each other. So so sad!
Remember robert maxwell.
Cigar cigar cigar....
If you know, you know 🎯
I feel for the guy that was picked off the street, murdered and used to replace Max.well
@@DontuseGoogleorWiki You mean picked out of a laboratory...
his last words were,"roseblub"
This wasn't any ordinary Yacht. It had the world's tallest mast that was 75 meters tall. Compare that to a normal sailing yacht's mast like you might take out on the weekend with your family. There isn't any comparison. We are comparing apple's and oranges. How was it designed? How did the mast behave during that storm? Most of us wouldn't be out on the water if the wind is over 30 knots. Most charter captans know this and check the weather reports, sea state before heading out on the water. A ship of this size and complexity is going to have it's own radar and access to the latest weather maps.
A Mafia job in the off shore Sicily, it certainly raises some eyebrows.
My thought also. never visit Sicily just days after you win a major court case against a Mega Corporation. The lawyer and the owner both had many enemies. lawyer was DA for the infamous Souther District of New York - the same that is railroading Donald Trump
It's not unheard of that a big yacht is knocked down, a slightly smaller yacht was knocked down towards 90 degrees in Auckland. There's video of the event so its not unheard of.
The radio guy just picked his nose and teeth on video with his right hand. Example of why shaking hands is best avoided. Disgusting.
Ha!
A yacht sinks in a storm. Never happened before. Completely unheard of!
Is the guest the head of sales, or the head of sails - at super yachts? Thanks
Burgess, who are one of the leading super yacht brokers.
Lynch’s wife owns the yacht company
@@darlenechandler2403 lynch’s wife owns the super yacht (which sank) through a company she controls/owns but she does not own Burgess Yachts who are unrelated.
The height of the mast was ridiculous 😮😮😮 200 feet .
Thats why it sank.
Did he and his co-defendant ever work for Boeing?
why have the survivors not been talking to the presS? Normally they do within a few hours of rescue
NDAs?
It's Italy and they're in the midst of an investigation. Maybe they aren't permitted to speak publicly at this time. Not all countries are like the US with press vultures at their doors harassing them.
Still in shock from the lightning .
Maybe because his wife owns the company that made the yacht.
They said the Titanic was unsinkable. How can you say it’s unheard of. They’ve got a nearly 300 foot mast massive sails that was hit by a tornado it’s gonna go over
It doesn’t take Sherlock to figure this one out 😳
They said the Titanic was unsinkable????
The captain and crew survived. They in charge to safeguard their guests, ultimately the captain. Why did the captain abandon the ship fully knowing there are people left behind? That is outrageous.
I was really surprised having watched my little brother paddling around in a 6ft rubber dingy and a decently sized waterspout passed right over him. The video of this tragedy shows very stormy and windy conditions that would make it hard to see the spout. The many I have seen occured under large storm clouds before rain and wind.
If there was a weather warning I'd have got people off the boat wether they like it or not.
God forbid the Yachting industry collapses - what would we do?! how would we get to work and continue living our lives??
Don’t forget that submarine that sunk and no survivors
The Alf Garnett lookalike speculating on it all cracks me up.
Can you say Robert maxwell 😂🤷🏽♂️ come in it’s very apparent at this point
It tipped over too far in the typhoon and all the water came in. Perhaps if the windows and doors were shut it would have been ok, It is summer, it is hot and my guess is doors and windows were open.
And his co defendant killed in a hit and run from an untraceable car less than two days before.
Was it an untraceable car? I read a 48 woman was questioned
The crew was so professional that they all survived (albeit the chef) and left 6 people in the cabins
Nautically speaking, shouldn't the captain be last to abandon ship ?
No one is saying, how this sailboat could even begin to sink.😂
Definitely not an iceberg because as we all know that is impossible
Got knocked on its side , water got in , couldn't right itself , more water in , down she goes. Another ship in front got knocked on her side and then rerighted herself. Bayesium couldn't reright as mast so big , too much mass to lift out of water.
Targeted DEW. Winter Soldier playbook. Michael Clayton'd.
Horrible story and thoughts with the families....but the only reason this is a story is because its rich people
Some might say Captains of Industry.... 👍🏻
edgallad, so a poor person would have the wherewithal to own this cheap family runabout??
you need rich people whether we like it or not i am skint, my mate is a milionaire he owns a roofing company doing building complexes but he employs 34 regular roofers.so he creates jobs and taxes he goes away at leat 6 times a year on holiday thats the way it is but he has worked for it
Here! Here!
Yawn. A millionaire is not rich. Your comment is inane.
This happening to a large sailing vessel is NOT unheard of. There was a similar incident in Auckland, NZ a few years ago which, by pure luck did not result in a sinking, though the boat was laid over with the mast in the water.
Didnt his mate , partner in crime just get killed on his bicycle by a car , like a week ago , , also 15 people in the liferaft , but not the primary guest owner …
Also at this point they could still be alive …
No he wasn't on a bicycle or a skateboard or a pair of roller skates. He was on his feet running.
@@Isabelbeau him and his daughter probably sitting jn a pub with pkt of crisps, pint of lager and amnesia
We all feel the pain TOGETHER... Let us pray 🎉
He shouldn't have messed with Hewlett Packard
Extensively trained 27 YO crews under pressure from a MULTI-BILLIONNAIRE Yacht owner clear recipe for safety😂
Hm. His colleague passes, he thinks "What an opportune time to take a cruise on a boat my wife's company owns!" Then a storm occurs that didn't affect the nearby pontoon boats and those involved in the case haven't been found dead but mysteriously disappear. 🤔 Follow the money. His, hers, the companies and their adjuncts.
'tis all very very strange ?
The other boats in the harbour were not a "show-off" yacht with an overly tall mast and a retractable keel. Most unstable boat there got hit by a water spout.
@@NDAsDontCoverIllegalActs he might have reckoned that being on the boat was one of the safest places to be.
How did the water get in. How were the automatic bilge pumps overwhelmed?
They say someone could have opened the hatches or doors. How many rooms on that boat for sleeping.
The ghost of Maxwell....
Absolutely right - he was the most honest & accurate commentator. As the days have gone on and information coming through I am not buying it. A modern yacht that has sailed over the Atlantic goes down in freak weather? Eye witness events? The other sail boat didn't get affected? My daughter works on super yachts. The crew are highly trained, they would go through regular safety training, everything is logged in the main log & crew log books. There is something fishy here - excuse the pun but these expensive boats are built & crewed to exceptionally high standards. Coincidence that all those involved in a lawsuit are now dead and the work Mike Lynch was heading up will now be in jeopardy which is rather convenient for some
Actually not. Explained elsewhere that likely the keel was retracted which raised the center of mass and with that tall mast the storm just blew her over. And, likely hatches and ports were open causing the vessel to quickly sink.
Good info here: ua-cam.com/video/ovcOgJweuOc/v-deo.htmlsi=xdnXCWsbBRLHF9KM
at 3:58 "these vessels are all professionally crewed"
WHY would your claim be true? maybe it was. maybe yacht-guy was lying.
(are you claiming that "tall mast" had her sail up?
ALSO: why would she have her keel retracted? real question, what was the explanation by "explained elsewhere"?)
What would the Keel be retracted if they are anchored for the night? Surely that would give them stability rather than rocking from side to side?
look at photos nothing that would make it sink that fast
@op3129 The Titanic was "professionally crewed".... 🤷🏽♂️
@@smithbrownjones yeah.
but the boat seller is the one pushing that, not me.
("professionally crewed" is OBVIOUSLY setting up a legal defense for his product)
This yacht was designed with a lifting keel. It would be lowered for sailing and raised for entering port. If the yacht was still under sail while the keel was in the raised position it could have an effect on the stability of the yacht. It will be interesting to see what position this keel was in at the time of the accident.
The sails were down.According to photos taken that night
The yacht must have taken in a lot of water in a short time, where there doors open close to the waterline to load/unload jet skies
They said something about the hatches may have been left open
A hole in the vessel caused by an explosion?
If the keel was retracted then the weight of the mast that went down, was enough to force the vessel, to capsize?