@@holloway4686 I assume it's to simulate only two lines firing at once whilst the others reload. I was thinking "why wasn't the mountains of bodies slowing the Spartans down".
@@holloway4686 that is true, and also in a realistic setting, the spartans would have a much harder time moving past their dead comrades. Looked like the modern soldiers lost in this case simply because the mountain of corpses made it so that they had no line of fire before they were already in melee range... if they had been allowed to take a few steps back when the mountain was getting too high, i think the modern soldiers would won the simulation
Apparently, they are 3 rules here: 1. Unlimited Bullet with no reloading 2. Spartans can't throw their spears 3. Modern army can shoot through their teammates
And they can't back up if the Spartan zombies start closing in. Gabriel at the pearlie gates: It says here you managed to kill 3000 Spartan zombies before one of them killed you with a spear.... Soldier: That's impressive right? Gabriel: No dude WTF? You have guns. Why didn't you just back up? You could have won!
You forgot that Spartans can run over a mountain of corpses without impediment. The soldiers are forced to clump up in a platoon. There is no psychological effect on the Spartans who are watching the front line get decimated easily. The list goes on
This raises many questions, and I'm not sure I want to bother reading the answers: Why do the Spartans break ranks? Why don't they try to encircle the soldiers? Is there a Spartan commander? Why don't they use their shields as shields? Why doesn't a Spartan grab a dying comrade and use him as a shield? Why don't the soldiers retreat? Do THEY have a commander? How much ammo do the soldiers have, and why don't they need to reload? How do I get my seven minutes back?
Spartan shields are made of bronze and wood, so unlikely to effectively defend against modern rifles. The scale of the dead also seemed unrealistic -- after a few minutes of slaughter it should have become unfeasible for the Spartans to run up a corpse mountain.
It’s unclear which side was more stupid: the Spartans for failing to improvise by flanking and swarming - or the modern soldiers for failing to retreat.
This is 100% accurate, everybody knows our modern soldiers recently upgraded to infinite ammo. *Edit* WTF?! How did this get so many likes? It's literally a shit comment!
look up DARPA and the kind of weaponry they have. Besides the weather wars (Texas, Alabama) they have technology that is sci fi. You can’t beat them with guns. Guns are a joke. they can send a drone to you and only you. Have you ever given your dna to a doctor or a heritage service? A little mosquito drone with your dna programmed can cut right through your screen.
Unlimited ammo, not needing to reload, firing through soldiers in front and no one thought to use one grenade. So realistic I simply cannot believe it.
I mean....its almost like this battle between Spartans and modern day soldiers in this vast desert wasteland was faked some how?!?!? Without your help, people might have thought this was an actual battle that took place. Thank you good citizen, you have truly righted the wrongs today.
Its a GAME. My main issue was that dead bodies having no physics or collision, if the bodies had of piled up it would have made it a LOT more realistic. But again, its a "basic" game, there are others & there is also a MUCH better sequel.
My grandfather fought in this battle. If you look closely you can see him at 6:54. He was the one trying to make an end run to flank the enemy and the commander refused and demanded he climb over the mound of bodies like all the other 19,999 Spartans did. He was my hero and this battle should have gone so much differently. I think about it every day
@@joshwillingham4592 Naw barrels do heat to the point of failure, semi or automatic is irrelevant thats just the mechanism. Its the rate of firing and the barrel not having enough time to cool is the issue.
The Spartans should do " the banzai " and attack in waves formation. The distance between the Spartans and modern soldiers will determine who wins and who loses. The further the distance in favour the modern soldiers whilst the closer the distance will favour the Spartans.
The fact that the modern soldiers never once thought of putting some distance between them and the bodies, allowing for the Spartans to effectively be on high ground - even if that high ground was a mountain of dead people they somehow thought they had to go over instead of around - and losing their main advantage of being able to kill from a distance is almost as impressive as the infinite ammo they were given.
The Greeks Spartans haven't used arrows are spears the modern troops haven't used their grenade launchers. It's up to the modern troops to keep them from closing the distance. The Modern troops should be leap forging away from the Greek one squad lays down a base of fire while the others move. Then they stop and lay down a base of fire. The easy way would be to use arty are gun ships.
At a minimum, the modern soldiers would have benefited from more of a V-formation, as the Spartan Pincer formed. But then, the Spartans wound have surely surrounded the modern soldiers 360 degrees, at which point their numbers would actually become decisive as there just aren’t enough modern soldiers to prevent that circle from closing into effective spear distance. Of course, limit the modern soldiers to realistic levels of ammo, and the limitations of weapon overheating, and it would have been a hugely different outcome, even with actual tactics.
100 soldiers would be carrying more than 30k rounds into combat. They would also be falling back. The rifles would also take a psychological toll on an army that had never encountered one. Spartans were not world war z undead.
And they are glad that the Spartans did not throw their spears. On the other hand ✋ the soldiers did not have grenade launchers, or hand grenades and even in the face of immanent doom, the Spartans never break ranks or get routed watching the first 10,000 die.
Unlimited ammo? Five hundred rounds each gives them 50,000 rounds. And three-round to five-round bursts will keep the barrel cool enough. With that kind of concentrated fire it would look and sound like everyone was on full auto with unlimited ammunition.
I understand the sarcasm, although you are completely missing the point that modern soldiers are the ones who were placed in the most disadvantage here. 1. They wouldn't just stand grouped in to a square formation. It would be more like a spread line - to cover the most area. 2. For some reason the Spartans start just 100 meters away - this is just ridiculous. You do know the aiming distance of a modern assault rifle is about 500-800 meters, right? They would start slaughtering them way before they could reach the 100 meters distance. 3. Stepping back is an option (although it wouldn't be necessary considering #1 and #2 above). 4. it's kinda weird that some of spartans keep running forward after being hit. Bullets don't work that way. You get hit once - you're out. And no, their shields can't protect at all, for a modern assault rifle spartanian shield is no better than a piece of cardboard. (it's only in video games you have to shoot 1 guy several times before he dies, in real life 1 bullet is quite enough) And as for the spartan's formation - it's actually quite correct, they were fighting in phalanx. So in case of war that's exactly how they would start their battle.
@@vlad1m1rk0rnev 1. Yes, they would spread out probably since the firing in this video would be prohibited by military standarts. They are "firing through each other" 2. The "aiming distance of a modern assault rifle" depends on its scope. 500 - 800 meters is the effective range of the gun, meaning at which distance in most cases it still deals proper damage. A 5,56 mm round is not the fastest bullet, and when a target is running, you have to lead the bullet anywhere over 100 meters distance to the target. The soliders in this video are holding an m16 (which fires 5,56 mm rounds), which they would probably use with iron sights, holo sights or some kind of red dot + x4 magnification dual purpose scope. These weapons have recoil, and firing at anything above 250 meters makes even firing salves for most modern soliders impossible, since the weapon recoil makes pointing the gun hard for them. They would fire at a much lower frequency, and probably while laying on the ground to keep their aim more steady, or kneeing, since they know they have a lot of targets and can't afford to run out of strength in their arms while standing. Full auto at anything above 50 meters is impossible for most modern soliders. 3. No. Most modern soliders can not walk backwards while trying to aim above or below the shield of a running solider, especially if they might step on someone else or equipment nearby that they need to have close to them. And in this video you see US Marines, becouse of the Weapons they use (m16) and their camouflage color. Most US Marines are not used to walking on sand, especially not backwards. A m16 has clips of 30 rounds each, which requires a lot of reloads, and most modern soliders, especially the ones going into the desert like in this video do not carry a lot of gear. Reloading would make this pretty much impossible for most, overheating the gun comes on top of that for most cases (most assault rifles are just made from steel, and heat up each time a round goes off in the barell, and makes them bend if they continue firing), and most soliders in these cases would have an ammo truck somewhere next to them where they can take clips from, which also requires concentration and time to manage. 4. The shields used by the spartans was the Aspis (Look that up in wikipedia) Which was 25 - 38 mm thick, and consisted out of a bronze layer with wood underneath it. Most times a 5,56 mm moves through material like that it fragments at the end, leaving fast traveling shrapnel to hit things behind it. If the spartans would have worn some kind of breastplate, the shrapnell would have mostly gotten deflected at the second layer becouse of the low mass of the shrapnell. You seem to have no knowledge about how bullets behave, since it happens quite often that a solider gets hit and doesn't die in modern battles. A 5,56 rounds does not have a lot of stopping power, some people even survived shots to the head by it (Without a helmet). There are some videos on youtube in which soliders in Afghanistan got hit by a 7,62 mm, which is significantly larger in diameter and overall bullet size, and survived. In a scenario like this most modern soliders would fight the heat of the desert, being hard on their concentration, trying to balance weapon recoil, manage their balance on the sand below their feet they aren't used to, and trying to coordinate how they get more ammo in case they run out. In a realistic battle in this scenario most modern soliders would have died after killing somewhere between 100 and 1000 spartans, since they also miss shots, have to reload, and the other points mentioned above. In real life in most cases the soliders would have called in artillery or an air strike before it gets to that point. What artillery does in this situation you can see from the Russia / Ukraine videos of the TOS - 1 Artillery tank. As of Jets there are bombs called "cluster bombs" which open up during their flight path, and make smaller bombs spread out over a huge area. Most spartans if not dead in the blast would have been injured by the blast of such a weapon or at least disorientated and with their eardrums missing. If something was still standing in most cases they would have done a second run with the Jet on the targets or a second run of the Artillery.
"Most Marines are not used to sand." 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 *Deep breath* 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Spartans: - No fear of magic boom sticks that turn everything within range to hamburger. - Sure footing on mountain created by the fallen corpses of their fellow Spartans. Also soldiers: - Do not move from the position you started in. Prevents them from switching to a better formation or even retreating out of spear throwing range while continuing to fire.
Right, I mean the Zulus beat the British as the battle of Islandwana, they actually had the element of surprise and superior knowledge of the terrain and used tactics.
@@TemujinMSM and yet the same zulu's lost at rourke's drift. The zulu's had comparable weapons to the spartans and the defenders of Rourke's drift had about 3% of the firepower of modern soldiers.
I don’t think you have to be a military genius to understand that running at a full sprint with the one piece of cover you have, hanging by your side, right into constant fire is a bad idea
Who believes the Spartans are too stupid to change strategy after quickly realizing the superior weapons of the opponent? Congratulations, you are ready to get vaccinated.
This would be the holding action till rescue units are able to set up strong points, rear operating bases & coordinate danger close artillery & air support. A-10s, C-130 , Air-Cobras, with a 25 combat drones. sadkitty.louie@gmail.com
Typical modern soldier kit out: Rifle - 7 mags x 30 rounds = 210 rounds. Sidearm 3 mags x 17 rounds.= 51 rounds. Total 261 bullets x 100 soldiers = 26,100 bullets. More than enough for 20,000 Spartans!
The modern soldiers formation is dumb as hell. A double rank formation with the front rank on a knee would have been much more tactically sound. However….with dumb the formation if the back ranks were using explosives the whole time then it would have made a lot more sense. But….no explosives were used just an endless and unfaltering expenditure of ammo. Yeah…
Wow, those modern soldiers can not only shoot through each other, they can fire on full auto without intermission for hours. No overheated barrels, no jamming, no problem.
that's not full auto. 100 rifles with semi automatic fire is more than 65 rounds per second continuous. they would also obviously spread out to form a line and continue to walk backwards as they slaughtered the spartans at will. the spartans meanwhile would be treading through blood and brains and guys screaming in agony and be slowed down massively. 100 riflemen means grenades, machineguns, mortars, claymore mines, rifle grenades, anti tank rockets. they don't stand in formation 4 deep and vs 20,000 targets forced to charge, they would barely miss at all. this is world war 1 casualties crossing no mans land when only one side is shooting and the other is out in the open. the defenders can keep backing up to extend the range and the attackers are going to be lucky if 50% of their number don't flee after they see the ten guys in front of them turned to pink mist.
1 modern with weapons 100 soldiers could fire a 100,000 rounds in about 10 minutes depending on the round 1 round would go through 2 or 3 soldiers it would have been over alot faster
Well to be fair the Spartans did have some advantages to as if you were one and the most advanced weapons you had were bows and short swords and your enemy had a weapon that would kill you in a blink of an eye and made a sound like thunder a retreat would be likely.Same could be said about the soldiers but I think they’d have confidence in their gun.Then the Spartans seeing hundreds if not thousands of their dead without a scratch on the enemy would also be terrifying.The bodies from the dead would also act as snares and pull be hard to walk over.Of course it doesn’t completely balance it out but if you think about it does pretty much allow the Spartans to win
They would have died quicker the way the soliders were positioned was retarded if they had been in a line one next to each other they would be 2-4x as effective because the ones at the back weren’t shooting
Aside from everything else wrong that's been pointed out, if Spartans observed what kind of magical ranged weapons their enemy had, they certainly wouldn't have been stupid enough to take a single, tight formation, either.
what formation do you suppose 20,000 men can take to approach a group only 100 people strong? a line 20,000 men wide standing shoulder to shoulder is about 10 miles wide. 3/4'sw of the Spartans would be 20 minutes from getting into combat while everyone close enough would be dead. there is no magic formation that allows 20,000 people to try and close to stabbing range and not be an unmissable target. imagine half a football stadium trying to rush down onto the field and climb up the other side of the stadium against 100 men with rifles. now stretch that approach out ten times longer because instead of getting killed at 50 yards the Spartans are getting dropped like flies at 500 yards. the modern soldiers are faster, have better optics, have camouflage, radios and ranged weapons beyond Spartans wildest imagination. They could just kill a few hundred Spartans and retreat over and over and never once would a spartan get within 50 yards of them.
@@brianb7388 bro modern soldiers would get fucked up in hand to hand combat the Spartans were bread for war as soon as they were around 7 , but technology makes it so it doesn’t matter so the modern soldiers would just homing missle them mfs
@@mikah_legend1272 in straight up hand to hand combat the moderns would stand a decent chance. Much better than most of the people posting here assume. Modern soldiers are bigger, stronger and faster. Not just by a little but by a large margin. In every hundred modern soldiers there's 10-20 who are well over 200lbs, some will have trained as boxers, kick boxers and/or mixed martial artists. Any of those people is going to prove very formidable for 5'7" 160lb guy no matter how much mythology has been attached to their legend. There's a reason they have weight classes in combat sports. If you're talking about hand to hand combat with swords then obviously the Spartans win 99 out of 100. None of this matters. The battle is going to end in under 2 minutes when the Spartans realize they just took more casualties in a shorter time span than any battle in spartan history. The reason modern soldiers don't train much in unarmed combat is because modern weapons are so effective at killing people long before the range drops to zero.
If you're going that route, then make it so that soldiers would know fear as well. A big part of ancient battles is the routing of foes. I would wager that many of the Spartans would rout and flee the battlefield after seeing countless comrades fall to 'magic' in the blink of an eye.
Having climbed over mountains of corpses in my days as an ancient Spartan, I can tell you, this is an absurd video. There's no way you can traverse that much man jelly that quickly.
Speaking as a prior-service soldier who was issued an M4A1 with a unlimited magazine, the barrel gets pretty hot after the first 30,000 or so rounds on full-auto. This video is ridiculous since, in reality, they would need to take a 2-3 second pause every 10,000 rounds fired in order to keep the barrel cool.
I remember brother, I was ready to die a glorious death with you by my side. It was only thanks to the wealth of knowledge from some of the comments that we are still alive to this day because apparently the medieval times came before the Spartans when in fact they were separated by over 600 years and the reverse at the very least it’s a bitch getting old I mean you’re like eight years older than I was back then so you’re probably 3600 years young or so. That was trading jokes with the Leonidas and the the knights of the round table he couldn’t sit down obviously because he died 1600 years earlier or so. Wait! Simulation? What are we simulating? Anyway it was good catching up with you brother I’m glad to hear that you’re still doing well in the prime of your life. Be well.
So there is a real life example of this, kinda. In 1879, approx. 20,000 Zulu spearmen attacked around 2000 British soldiers armed with bolt action rifles and a few Gatling machine guns, basically a machine gun on a cannon mount. Unlike the Spartans in this silly sim, The Zulu won by departing from their usual boxed phalanx formations by spreading out over the terrain using the cover of tall grasses and flanking on both sides in a horn attack thereby limiting their losses and overwhelming the British. In fact the British still had tens of thousands rounds left when they were overwhelmed. Like modern guns, the Gatling's had issues with overheating. As the Russians proved in WWII and even now in Ukraine, Bayonet charges of soldiers lacking any ammunition still works if you have more men then the enemy has bullets. As the modern infantryman has a 210 round loadout, a force of of at least 21,200 spearmen would beat 100 modern soldiers, assuming perfect shot accuracy.
No Gatling gun at Isandlwana, but the coastal column had one. At Isandlwana, 750 British soldiers and 1000 colonial troops faced about 15,000 Zulus. Only around 100 of the colonials had firearms. The British rifles were single shot breech loaders, not magazine fed bolt action. OTOH, a modern 100-man rifle company would have at least 20 beltfed machine guns, a similar number of grenade launchers and of larger explosive projectors, ie rocket launchers, recoilless rifles and/or antitank guided missiles. Each MG would have some 700 rounds, while, as you note, each of ~80 riflemen would carry at least seven 30 round magazines. There would also be many pistols. Even such a small company should also have a section of two or three 60mm mortars or 30-40mm automatic grenade launchers. With proper tactics, the moderns could defeat the Spartans, even if reinforced with auxiliary archers. Rifles out range arrows, and modern body armor and helmets would stop them anyway.
So stupid mags only hold 30 + 1 chamber if some have m249’s then they have 200 rounds in gun but you have to reload lmao so dumb the 100 men would be slaughtered
@@Aerial_Imagingif the vest if of kevlar, which it mostly is, then it's a game over. The sharp spears will rip the fabric, the fabric only stops small and blunt small rounds of ammo
Yeah, there was obviously a rule that the modern soldiers had to stay in that formation. That is not how that would've been fought in reality....considering modern soldiers are fighting Spartans. A first year cadet at west point would see this out come. They'd be spread out in fire teams with interlocking fields of fire. It eliminates the possibility of shooting the same spartan by multiple modern soldiers, simultaneously supporting eachother. It would force the Spartans to split up in to groups to attack the separate fire teams making it easier to eliminate 20000 Spartans in batches rather than all at once.
Also the spartans would have thrown their spears or use their numerical advantage to envelope the enemy which I don't see happening. Not a very good sim imo
They really have increased load-outs and mag capacity! Tactics: stand in place and just shoot, shoot through the soldiers in front of you. Just don’t move. Using the lowest number of rounds per minute at 700, there would be a total of 490,000 rounds fired during this engagement. They would almost be up to their necks in brass, oh and their barrels and some components would have melted before the halfway point of the firefight.
@@chaddufour7693 possibly mags getting a bit hot too... some mags exploding. I assume we can only see the tracer rounds in the video so the actual fire rate would be a lot greater than it seems.
@@cristianbenites4521 well the spartans didn't use bows because they believed it to be a cowards weapon because in battle they weren't killing their enimes up close, but if they all threw their spears it would have worked
Hypothetically, let’s say each of those soldiers had the standard combat load for the m4a1 (which is 7 mags with 30 rounds, 1 in the weapon and 6 on their carrier) each. That equals out to 210 rounds per soldier. There are 100 soldiers each with 210 rounds which equals to 21,000 rounds. So I guess technically if they never miss their mark and hit each one of the Spartans center mass this could theoretically work and they each would have 10 rounds to spare.
That assumes the Spartans stand still. GEN Gorman ran the numbers on a Soviet tank attack, and the key factor was the time it took for the tanks to cross the field as a function of speed. So US tanks could shoot 2x before they had to fall back or be overrun. The USMC ran a test of expert shooters against moving targets.... the hit % was zero. The USMC is now investing heavily in combat ranges with active, moving targets. Generally, based on combat data, far more enemy are wounded than killed. Just getting hit anywhere is not necessarily lethal.
@@nomadames9538 Glad that modern solider can easily get out of the reach of their spears.....and they can easily kill 20000 without any casualties....😂.... Glad that modern solider only had guns....or this war will be over in second
The modern soldiers would run out of ammo and get slaughtered eventually. The weirdest thing about this is I didn't see any Spartans hold up their shields to block gunfire or throw a single spear. That would've been good to see cuz the Spartans were smart as well as tough AF too. Hopefully some other viewers thought the same thing I did.
If you want get realistic which is actually very petty but modern soldier will simulate the combat before going into war besides morder soldiers would use tanks
Agreed. I find that the safest place to shoot from is directly behind and between my battle buddie's shoulders. This way the bullet gets to taste blood BEFORE it hits the enemy.
Bill gates in 1974 : I'm excited to see what people will do with computers in future People of future : edit : 326 like i've never got this many likes before
You wouldn't go full auto for the most part anyway. Full auto is more for suppressive fire, 3 feet off the ground side to side. You are far mor accurate with single shots.
@@jonathancarrillo1559 that's what i mean is a spear and a shield cannot beat bullets of that velocity..but what isn't realistic is creating a simulation of such whereby the guns aren't being reloaded by the soldiers if that was the case American soldiers wouldn't have to flea from Iraq, thus a magazine with endless supply of bullets isn fair huh so if someone were to create a simulation atleast try and be precise with the facts...and by the way i wouldn't downgrade a shield n a spear for both can do the same damage as a body armor and a bullet would..its just how you use it..in real life the spartans would have won because of numbers and reloading takes time ,1 round of spears thrown up boom all soldiers dead..hoo hoo ha haa! ✊
Yes. they would start throwing their spears. They wouldn't just keep rushing headlong into a hail of gunfire. They wouldn't know what gunfire was, but they'd see its' effect and act accordingly.
@DT. Redgrave that's still a lot to compute, there are versions of this where there are millions moving, shooting and dying, creating obstacles to climb over and a lot of graphics without any lag.
The fact that not one spartan threw their spear is a little odd not to mention unlimited ammo and the guns melting after all that non stop shooting. Spartans could have just surrounded them from all angles it’d be over
@@ishowspeed363 he knows that, everyone knows that, but that kind of stuff should be coded in was his point, he just didn't word it properly for you to comprehend. "yes its a simulation, but you have to at least account for basic factors to simulate something" like if you simulate superman vs hulk, and in your simulation superman never flies or uses heat vision... its a bad simulation, and you jump in and say "dude its not real"... bro, we know its not real. thats not the point. perhaps if i said, im gonna have a simulation of trump vs biden, but both of them had no hands and feet. get the idea yet? do i need to give you 50 more examples?
Imagine training your whole life to become a spartan and your first battle you are randomly shot and killed by a modern soldier with less than 6 months of training
When they said that high ground gives an advantage, I dont think they meant "create an high ground with the bodies of your comrades" but yet here we are. It worked
@@amazingfireboy1848 nah, I don't think that would have made huge difference. It might have helped but those shields can pe penetrated by arrows, against bullets, it doesn't stand a chance.
I can't believe no one has mentioned the fact that the modern soldiers couldn't move. Even a steady slow march aft would have extended this whole thing a lot. And yes I understand the infinite ammo, and friendly fire off is ridiculous as well.
Спасибо что выдал вашу тактику. Я русский шпион, и я передам в Кремль, как ваши солдаты намерены маневрировать на поле боя 🙂 Теперь наша непобедимая российская армия будет тренироваться, опираясь на эту информацию! Великий лидер Владимир Путин наградит тебя Орденом Красной Звезды, и выплатит тебе одноразовую премию 500 рублей 👍
The Spartans started winning once they took the high ground. Not having any high ground available from the start didn't stop them from creating some high ground.
@@adamirishconundrum851 agreed assuming enough bullets. But also pretty sure Spartans would have been routed when they lost 5000 in a one sided firefight similar to the colonial wars.
This deserves an award for the most unrealistic war simulation
They got to reload
@@holloway4686 I assume it's to simulate only two lines firing at once whilst the others reload. I was thinking "why wasn't the mountains of bodies slowing the Spartans down".
@@holloway4686 that is true, and also in a realistic setting, the spartans would have a much harder time moving past their dead comrades. Looked like the modern soldiers lost in this case simply because the mountain of corpses made it so that they had no line of fire before they were already in melee range... if they had been allowed to take a few steps back when the mountain was getting too high, i think the modern soldiers would won the simulation
@@pnodi5584 Also, if the modern soldiers had been allowed to fall back they might not have been overwhelmed.
Wrong formation and wrong rifle for this particular scenario.
Apparently, they are 3 rules here:
1. Unlimited Bullet with no reloading
2. Spartans can't throw their spears
3. Modern army can shoot through their teammates
And also spartans at the back cant just run around the soldiers to surrond them 🤷♂️🚶🏻♂️
And they can't back up if the Spartan zombies start closing in.
Gabriel at the pearlie gates: It says here you managed to kill 3000 Spartan zombies before one of them killed you with a spear....
Soldier: That's impressive right?
Gabriel: No dude WTF? You have guns. Why didn't you just back up? You could have won!
You forgot that Spartans can run over a mountain of corpses without impediment. The soldiers are forced to clump up in a platoon. There is no psychological effect on the Spartans who are watching the front line get decimated easily. The list goes on
@@ScaredShitlessable Yeah but those are Spartan zombies. How do Spartans wind up fighting the US Army? They rise from the dead!
And not a single soldier brought any grenades, mortars or missiles...
Unlimited bullet is insane 😂
Bro...ஆயிரத்தில் ஒருவன் climax scene😂😎
Cheater
I think they have m249
No thry have M16
What's crazy is that their not shooting each other's head.😅
This raises many questions, and I'm not sure I want to bother reading the answers:
Why do the Spartans break ranks?
Why don't they try to encircle the soldiers?
Is there a Spartan commander?
Why don't they use their shields as shields?
Why doesn't a Spartan grab a dying comrade and use him as a shield?
Why don't the soldiers retreat? Do THEY have a commander?
How much ammo do the soldiers have, and why don't they need to reload?
How do I get my seven minutes back?
@@rodschmidt8952 not his seven minutes
Spartan shields are made of bronze and wood, so unlikely to effectively defend against modern rifles. The scale of the dead also seemed unrealistic -- after a few minutes of slaughter it should have become unfeasible for the Spartans to run up a corpse mountain.
This simulation was made to bring back American pride using the most unrealistic simulation I've ever seen.
With thousands of spears laying around, why do no Spartans throw them.
@rodschmidt8952 it's just American pride propaganda. This simulation is bullshit.
It’s unclear which side was more stupid: the Spartans for failing to improvise by flanking and swarming - or the modern soldiers for failing to retreat.
What’s really stupid is watching this silly thing
@@davidwilliams8728 lol
Lol :]
Lmao!!
@@davidwilliams8728 😆 your comment almost pissed me off. I chose to laugh instead. 😆
This is 100% accurate, everybody knows our modern soldiers recently upgraded to infinite ammo.
*Edit* WTF?! How did this get so many likes? It's literally a shit comment!
Up, up, down, down, left, right, left, right, B, A, start
look up DARPA and the kind of weaponry they have. Besides the weather wars (Texas, Alabama) they have technology that is sci fi. You can’t beat them with guns. Guns are a joke. they can send a drone to you and only you. Have you ever given your dna to a doctor or a heritage service? A little mosquito drone with your dna programmed can cut right through your screen.
Ya ya man right
The Spartans have strong armour too 🤦♂️
I would just deploy infinite potatoes.
Just imagine if those modern soldiers had learnt that stepping backwards was an option.
Absolute game changer.
Yeah..
Haha
Yeah exactly
Just keep walking backwards whilst firing
Job done
Or maybe a grenade launcher, mortars, hand grenade, tear gas
@@romharjamesramos8324
Tear gas wouldn't have worked against the Spartans, they weren't allowed to cry
Or if the Spartans figured out they could go around the soldiers instead of only straight into intense fire.
People in the nearby skyscraper:
"Hey Jim, come look out the window!!!"
Unlimited ammo, not needing to reload, firing through soldiers in front and no one thought to use one grenade.
So realistic I simply cannot believe it.
I mean....its almost like this battle between Spartans and modern day soldiers in this vast desert wasteland was faked some how?!?!? Without your help, people might have thought this was an actual battle that took place. Thank you good citizen, you have truly righted the wrongs today.
@semperx3730 seems the sarcasm was lost on you...
Its a GAME. My main issue was that dead bodies having no physics or collision, if the bodies had of piled up it would have made it a LOT more realistic. But again, its a "basic" game, there are others & there is also a MUCH better sequel.
@@swizlestick Sarcasm doesn’t excuse stupid fucking comments.
whining about a game rofl
Soldier: sir, there are 20,000 men with spears coming straight towards us, what do we do?!
Commander: soldier..
*load the unlimited ammunition hack*
Loved your Idea
Not lok like spartan but zombi mybe.XD
@@agungfery850 yes right
Nah bro they just had a max ammo.
Also: Disable friendly fire and enable indestructible gun barrels.
My grandfather fought in this battle. If you look closely you can see him at 6:54. He was the one trying to make an end run to flank the enemy and the commander refused and demanded he climb over the mound of bodies like all the other 19,999 Spartans did.
He was my hero and this battle should have gone so much differently. I think about it every day
Where is Him?
@@Footballfans50790 everywhere all of them are his/her grandpa.
@@gn6691 Spartans consider themselves all as one - taking on one is taking on all.
Grandad always taught me that
This comment made me cry laughing
Holy shit bro........sry to hear that 🙏🏻
18,106 dead on one side, 100 dead on the other side. "Victorious" just doesn't seem like the best word to describe it somehow.
Unlimited ammo is one thing. But their barrels would have melted after 5 minutes or so of constant firing
@@joshwillingham4592 I've watched UA-camrs do it with semi autos
@@joshwillingham4592 Naw barrels do heat to the point of failure, semi or automatic is irrelevant thats just the mechanism. Its the rate of firing and the barrel not having enough time to cool is the issue.
Bruh are you a secret soldier fighting time travelling Spartans? You don't know what kind of arsenal they have
@@Jayess-c you found me out...
@@gurnblanstein9816 I knew it
"Did you win"??
Spartans : "yes"
"What did it cost"??
Spartans: "18106 brave spartans"
Did you win? Yes
What did it co- *YES*
Jesus
Thanos?
More like
"Did you win? "
Spartan : "yes"
"What did it cost?"
Spartan : "yes"
The Spartans should do " the banzai " and attack in waves formation.
The distance between the Spartans and modern soldiers will determine who wins and who loses.
The further the distance in favour the modern soldiers whilst the closer the distance will favour the Spartans.
Unlimited ammo, the ability to be shot through, and zero malfunctions while firing non-stop for ten minutes straight. Super impressed
And they still lost
@@silkroad1201 I mean if it was real the soldiers would easily win
Thats why they are not kiting, they are robots plugged by their feet
@@gear2902 lol hell nah u underestimating 20,000 people
@@gear2902 Real spartans wouldn't simply run in a straight line that also right into danger, yeah alright 💀
I still want to see a platoon of U.S. Marines against 10,000 karens: "I want to speak to your manager"!!
Even assuming all the guns were endlessly belt-fed. I find it odd that none of the Spartans considered throwing the spears
And that none of the soldiers threw grenades?
The gun would also overheat and possibly jam up
And they all wait their turn to die, kind of like action scenes in movies with multiple opponents against one.
Maybe if they all went Predator and had mini guns ? 🤔
All they need is helicopters with min gun or some rocket launchers and the job will be finished
The fact that the modern soldiers never once thought of putting some distance between them and the bodies, allowing for the Spartans to effectively be on high ground - even if that high ground was a mountain of dead people they somehow thought they had to go over instead of around - and losing their main advantage of being able to kill from a distance is almost as impressive as the infinite ammo they were given.
The Greeks Spartans haven't used arrows are spears the modern troops haven't used their grenade launchers. It's up to the modern troops to keep them from closing the distance. The Modern troops should be leap forging away from the Greek one squad lays down a base of fire while the others move. Then they stop and lay down a base of fire. The easy way would be to use arty are gun ships.
Those Spartans used the Russian WWII strategy. Send more men than the machine gun's bullets.
At a minimum, the modern soldiers would have benefited from more of a V-formation, as the Spartan Pincer formed.
But then, the Spartans wound have surely surrounded the modern soldiers 360 degrees, at which point their numbers would actually become decisive as there just aren’t enough modern soldiers to prevent that circle from closing into effective spear distance.
Of course, limit the modern soldiers to realistic levels of ammo, and the limitations of weapon overheating, and it would have been a hugely different outcome, even with actual tactics.
@@CineSoar Yap take care 🙂
@@hd27294 they sure did.
i'll bet those soldiers are glad they had unlimited ammunition, heat resistant barrels, and wrist braces
100 soldiers would be carrying more than 30k rounds into combat. They would also be falling back. The rifles would also take a psychological toll on an army that had never encountered one. Spartans were not world war z undead.
And they are glad that the Spartans did not throw their spears. On the other hand ✋ the soldiers did not have grenade launchers, or hand grenades and even in the face of immanent doom, the Spartans never break ranks or get routed watching the first 10,000 die.
Do you actually think this was supposed to be a perfectly accurate simulation?
Unlimited ammo? Five hundred rounds each gives them 50,000 rounds. And three-round to five-round bursts will keep the barrel cool enough. With that kind of concentrated fire it would look and sound like everyone was on full auto with unlimited ammunition.
10 men would win
The random "Are you ready?" At about 4:00 😂
Tip to make it even more ridiculous: Line up the 20.000 Spartans one behind the other. This way one single soldier with unlimited ammo would do.
I got the sarcasm 🤣👌
I understand the sarcasm, although you are completely missing the point that modern soldiers are the ones who were placed in the most disadvantage here.
1. They wouldn't just stand grouped in to a square formation. It would be more like a spread line - to cover the most area.
2. For some reason the Spartans start just 100 meters away - this is just ridiculous. You do know the aiming distance of a modern assault rifle is about 500-800 meters, right? They would start slaughtering them way before they could reach the 100 meters distance.
3. Stepping back is an option (although it wouldn't be necessary considering #1 and #2 above).
4. it's kinda weird that some of spartans keep running forward after being hit. Bullets don't work that way. You get hit once - you're out. And no, their shields can't protect at all, for a modern assault rifle spartanian shield is no better than a piece of cardboard. (it's only in video games you have to shoot 1 guy several times before he dies, in real life 1 bullet is quite enough)
And as for the spartan's formation - it's actually quite correct, they were fighting in phalanx. So in case of war that's exactly how they would start their battle.
@@vlad1m1rk0rnev
1. Yes, they would spread out probably since the firing in this video would be prohibited by military standarts. They are "firing through each other"
2. The "aiming distance of a modern assault rifle" depends on its scope. 500 - 800 meters is the effective range of the gun, meaning at which distance in most cases it still deals proper damage. A 5,56 mm round is not the fastest bullet, and when a target is running, you have to lead the bullet anywhere over 100 meters distance to the target. The soliders in this video are holding an m16 (which fires 5,56 mm rounds), which they would probably use with iron sights, holo sights or some kind of red dot + x4 magnification dual purpose scope. These weapons have recoil, and firing at anything above 250 meters makes even firing salves for most modern soliders impossible, since the weapon recoil makes pointing the gun hard for them. They would fire at a much lower frequency, and probably while laying on the ground to keep their aim more steady, or kneeing, since they know they have a lot of targets and can't afford to run out of strength in their arms while standing.
Full auto at anything above 50 meters is impossible for most modern soliders.
3. No. Most modern soliders can not walk backwards while trying to aim above or below the shield of a running solider, especially if they might step on someone else or equipment nearby that they need to have close to them. And in this video you see US Marines, becouse of the Weapons they use (m16) and their camouflage color. Most US Marines are not used to walking on sand, especially not backwards. A m16 has clips of 30 rounds each, which requires a lot of reloads, and most modern soliders, especially the ones going into the desert like in this video do not carry a lot of gear. Reloading would make this pretty much impossible for most, overheating the gun comes on top of that for most cases (most assault rifles are just made from steel, and heat up each time a round goes off in the barell, and makes them bend if they continue firing), and most soliders in these cases would have an ammo truck somewhere next to them where they can take clips from, which also requires concentration and time to manage.
4. The shields used by the spartans was the Aspis (Look that up in wikipedia) Which was 25 - 38 mm thick, and consisted out of a bronze layer with wood underneath it. Most times a 5,56 mm moves through material like that it fragments at the end, leaving fast traveling shrapnel to hit things behind it. If the spartans would have worn some kind of breastplate, the shrapnell would have mostly gotten deflected at the second layer becouse of the low mass of the shrapnell.
You seem to have no knowledge about how bullets behave, since it happens quite often that a solider gets hit and doesn't die in modern battles. A 5,56 rounds does not have a lot of stopping power, some people even survived shots to the head by it (Without a helmet). There are some videos on youtube in which soliders in Afghanistan got hit by a 7,62 mm, which is significantly larger in diameter and overall bullet size, and survived.
In a scenario like this most modern soliders would fight the heat of the desert, being hard on their concentration, trying to balance weapon recoil, manage their balance on the sand below their feet they aren't used to, and trying to coordinate how they get more ammo in case they run out.
In a realistic battle in this scenario most modern soliders would have died after killing somewhere between 100 and 1000 spartans, since they also miss shots, have to reload, and the other points mentioned above.
In real life in most cases the soliders would have called in artillery or an air strike before it gets to that point. What artillery does in this situation you can see from the Russia / Ukraine videos of the TOS - 1 Artillery tank. As of Jets there are bombs called "cluster bombs" which open up during their flight path, and make smaller bombs spread out over a huge area. Most spartans if not dead in the blast would have been injured by the blast of such a weapon or at least disorientated and with their eardrums missing. If something was still standing in most cases they would have done a second run with the Jet on the targets or a second run of the Artillery.
Así de inútiles son las muertes de los soldados en una guerra por caprichos de un presidente ucraniano.
"Most Marines are not used to sand." 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 *Deep breath* 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Spartan General: "They had us in the first half i ain't gonna lie"
Spartans:
- Don't surround your opponents
- Don't throw spears when in range
Soldiers:
- Unlimited ammo
- Never have to re-load
Spartans:
- No fear of magic boom sticks that turn everything within range to hamburger.
- Sure footing on mountain created by the fallen corpses of their fellow Spartans.
Also soldiers:
- Do not move from the position you started in. Prevents them from switching to a better formation or even retreating out of spear throwing range while continuing to fire.
Right, I mean the Zulus beat the British as the battle of Islandwana, they actually had the element of surprise and superior knowledge of the terrain and used tactics.
Also the soldiers didn't even try to increase the distance between them and the spartans
@@TemujinMSM and yet the same zulu's lost at rourke's drift. The zulu's had comparable weapons to the spartans and the defenders of Rourke's drift had about 3% of the firepower of modern soldiers.
@@brianb7388 still lethal at a Greater distance, I prefer a Martial combat, super fair😆
Why do they sound like an entire army of Dave Mustains?! 😂🤣
"Hello me, it's me again"
Fr lol
After reading comments for 10 mins i can now say that I am a certified military general now
I don’t think you have to be a military genius to understand that running at a full sprint with the one piece of cover you have, hanging by your side, right into constant fire is a bad idea
Same
I didn't know they gave out certificate for these. 🤧
@@Glitchfaction bruh it's just a game
LMAO 😂
Nobody reload and nobody try to throw a spear
Very accurate simulation
Agree... 😂
Infinite ammo.
Idiot spartans who dont try atack from behind too 😂or even use the shield...
I lost my time
Agreed man
And nobody used a shield. In skyrim somebody would say "Once I was a traveler like you. But then I was got an arrow through my knee......"
@@-ZUG- The shield was useless. The bullet will Hole it and kill em. ( sorry for english)
Who believes the Spartans are too stupid to change strategy after quickly realizing the superior weapons of the opponent? Congratulations, you are ready to get vaccinated.
“Sir, how many bullets do we have on deck?”
General-“Yes”
This would be the holding action till rescue units are able to set up strong points, rear operating bases & coordinate danger close artillery & air support. A-10s, C-130 , Air-Cobras, with a 25 combat drones. sadkitty.louie@gmail.com
Combat Air Controllers to coordinate with drone combat supplies chain.
General: Enough to cover the sunlight.
Me: You shall die under the shade.
😂😂😂
@@williamlouie479 ohhhh ma good :b
Apparently the Spartans never heard of Deep Flanking: "Remember! Run towards the bullets, guys!"
@@joescott8877 they don’t know what f*king bullets are
Spartans: "They had us in the first half, not gonna lie."
😁😁😁😁
Pretty sure this is homophobia. Spartans were gay. So this is technically the biggest slaughter of homosexual men in history.
@@danemeyer008 First of all no, not all spartans where gay, only around like 300.
@Dane Meyer00 probably bisexual in some cases.
@@AkaSwvy and that's why 300 spartans were sent to their deaths
Modern Soldiers: We got unlimited ammo!
Spartans: We've made our own high ground!
🤣
Typical modern soldier kit out: Rifle - 7 mags x 30 rounds = 210 rounds. Sidearm 3 mags x 17 rounds.= 51 rounds. Total 261 bullets x 100 soldiers = 26,100 bullets. More than enough for 20,000 Spartans!
@@michaelyoong44 wastage?
So realistic. (Sic)
Need just one soldier with a fighter plane..
I was expecting the spartans to throw a few spears
Yeah me too
Use bow and arrows
Yeah
Definitely cheating
Extra spears with the fallen too
And they don't even flank to attack from the sides
They would in real life.
The guns would over heat, no reloading, 😂😂 good attempt tho enjoyed it, 😜
Shooting in that compact formation.
Friendly fire: I don't exist.
And the Spartans not trying to flanking/rounding or something, meh.
hahahhaha everyone is nooob
Yeah lol
The modern soldiers formation is dumb as hell. A double rank formation with the front rank on a knee would have been much more tactically sound. However….with dumb the formation if the back ranks were using explosives the whole time then it would have made a lot more sense. But….no explosives were used just an endless and unfaltering expenditure of ammo. Yeah…
Seems like the modern soldiers forgot they could fallback while still engaging the enemy, thus keeping distance between them and their enemies
I think that's offset by the braindead way the Spartans don't fan out and move around behind the soldiers.
and the Spartans forgot they could throw those spears.
They dont even take a step, they just slide around in place and shoot, also they seem to have infinite ammo and no grenades.
Nobody mentioning the endless ammo and no reloads?
@@Make-Asylums-Great-Again me
Spartan : Are you out of ammo?
Soldier. : Nope not yet
Spartan : guess we will continue
So the soldiers in the back can shoot through all the soldiers in front of them. Very realistic.
Modern : ultimate ammo mode.
Spartan : ultimate sacrifice mode.
Und die Spartana zu blöd um ihre Speere zu werfen.
Die müssen nicht nachladen
modern soldiers without granites😝😝😝😆😆😆
@@ponnrajpaulraj9527 *grenades
First of all the guns wouldn't work that much continuously. Second 20000 would do enough damage.
The modern soldiers at the back must have incredible aim, to fire consistantly between the three rows of their own men in front of them.
i saw friendly fire blood on the ground before the spartans were even close enough to have attacked
not to mention they don't bother to reload once...
Or run out of ammo
front row 5ft soldiers, second row 6ft, third row 7ft.
Those high capacity magazines tho 😅
@@astanarcho8651 they traded their mobilit for infinit amno
The most astounding victory here is how RTS Battle Room got 19 million of us to WATCH this simulation, bravo lads!
It's 20 m. Now😂😂
"Sir, can we go around to the sides?"
"No, just walk directly over the 20' tall pile of corpses."
Wow, those modern soldiers can not only shoot through each other, they can fire on full auto without intermission for hours. No overheated barrels, no jamming, no problem.
Yeah well they aren't using grenades or retreating or using more powerful weapons
that's not full auto. 100 rifles with semi automatic fire is more than 65 rounds per second continuous. they would also obviously spread out to form a line and continue to walk backwards as they slaughtered the spartans at will. the spartans meanwhile would be treading through blood and brains and guys screaming in agony and be slowed down massively.
100 riflemen means grenades, machineguns, mortars, claymore mines, rifle grenades, anti tank rockets. they don't stand in formation 4 deep and vs 20,000 targets forced to charge, they would barely miss at all. this is world war 1 casualties crossing no mans land when only one side is shooting and the other is out in the open. the defenders can keep backing up to extend the range and the attackers are going to be lucky if 50% of their number don't flee after they see the ten guys in front of them turned to pink mist.
@@brianb7388 also the fact that a 50 caliber would easily go through 4-5 bronze shields and the men behind them.
1 modern with weapons 100 soldiers could fire a 100,000 rounds in about 10 minutes depending on the round 1 round would go through 2 or 3 soldiers it would have been over alot faster
Well to be fair the Spartans did have some advantages to as if you were one and the most advanced weapons you had were bows and short swords and your enemy had a weapon that would kill you in a blink of an eye and made a sound like thunder a retreat would be likely.Same could be said about the soldiers but I think they’d have confidence in their gun.Then the Spartans seeing hundreds if not thousands of their dead without a scratch on the enemy would also be terrifying.The bodies from the dead would also act as snares and pull be hard to walk over.Of course it doesn’t completely balance it out but if you think about it does pretty much allow the Spartans to win
Spartan: “Did anyone bring their bow and arrows?”
*archer has left the chat*
WHAT? SPEAK UP I CANNOT HEAR YOU.
Right bro.. They can use bow and arrows and soldiers cant stand there for a minute 😂😂
@@aashuthakur2488 SPARTANS NEVER USED BOWS.
Why didn’t they throw their spears
Soldiers: Unlimited ammo.
Spartans: Doesn't rise shields or throw their spears.
Well i mean the soldiers could fall back while continuing to engage too...
Also those shields aren’t thick, a few rounds would eventually just penetrate enough to just basically obliterate the shields
@@SantiRecon308 I am pretty sure 1 556 round could go through that
@@SantiRecon308 the shields would have been bronze. They ain’t stopping shit
Facts
No friendly fire, no out of ammunition
Spartans: "I wonder if we should go around"
Other spartans: "and miss all the fun!!?"
They would have died quicker the way the soliders were positioned was retarded if they had been in a line one next to each other they would be 2-4x as effective because the ones at the back weren’t shooting
Aside from everything else wrong that's been pointed out, if Spartans observed what kind of magical ranged weapons their enemy had, they certainly wouldn't have been stupid enough to take a single, tight formation, either.
what formation do you suppose 20,000 men can take to approach a group only 100 people strong? a line 20,000 men wide standing shoulder to shoulder is about 10 miles wide. 3/4'sw of the Spartans would be 20 minutes from getting into combat while everyone close enough would be dead.
there is no magic formation that allows 20,000 people to try and close to stabbing range and not be an unmissable target. imagine half a football stadium trying to rush down onto the field and climb up the other side of the stadium against 100 men with rifles. now stretch that approach out ten times longer because instead of getting killed at 50 yards the Spartans are getting dropped like flies at 500 yards. the modern soldiers are faster, have better optics, have camouflage, radios and ranged weapons beyond Spartans wildest imagination. They could just kill a few hundred Spartans and retreat over and over and never once would a spartan get within 50 yards of them.
@@brianb7388 bro modern soldiers would get fucked up in hand to hand combat the Spartans were bread for war as soon as they were around 7 , but technology makes it so it doesn’t matter so the modern soldiers would just homing missle them mfs
@@mikah_legend1272 in straight up hand to hand combat the moderns would stand a decent chance. Much better than most of the people posting here assume. Modern soldiers are bigger, stronger and faster. Not just by a little but by a large margin. In every hundred modern soldiers there's 10-20 who are well over 200lbs, some will have trained as boxers, kick boxers and/or mixed martial artists. Any of those people is going to prove very formidable for 5'7" 160lb guy no matter how much mythology has been attached to their legend. There's a reason they have weight classes in combat sports.
If you're talking about hand to hand combat with swords then obviously the Spartans win 99 out of 100.
None of this matters. The battle is going to end in under 2 minutes when the Spartans realize they just took more casualties in a shorter time span than any battle in spartan history.
The reason modern soldiers don't train much in unarmed combat is because modern weapons are so effective at killing people long before the range drops to zero.
If you're going that route, then make it so that soldiers would know fear as well. A big part of ancient battles is the routing of foes. I would wager that many of the Spartans would rout and flee the battlefield after seeing countless comrades fall to 'magic' in the blink of an eye.
Spartans could of just thrown there spear. But it’s a video game
Having climbed over mountains of corpses in my days as an ancient Spartan, I can tell you, this is an absurd video. There's no way you can traverse that much man jelly that quickly.
Speaking as a prior-service soldier who was issued an M4A1 with a unlimited magazine, the barrel gets pretty hot after the first 30,000 or so rounds on full-auto. This video is ridiculous since, in reality, they would need to take a 2-3 second pause every 10,000 rounds fired in order to keep the barrel cool.
He said “man jelly”!
I remember brother, I was ready to die a glorious death with you by my side. It was only thanks to the wealth of knowledge from some of the comments that we are still alive to this day because apparently the medieval times came before the Spartans when in fact they were separated by over 600 years and the reverse at the very least it’s a bitch getting old I mean you’re like eight years older than I was back then so you’re probably 3600 years young or so. That was trading jokes with the Leonidas and the the knights of the round table he couldn’t sit down obviously because he died 1600 years earlier or so. Wait! Simulation? What are we simulating?
Anyway it was good catching up with you brother I’m glad to hear that you’re still doing well in the prime of your life. Be well.
@@Centermass762 perhaps these guys have a watercooled rifle?
Yes it hurts
So there is a real life example of this, kinda. In 1879, approx. 20,000 Zulu spearmen attacked around 2000 British soldiers armed with bolt action rifles and a few Gatling machine guns, basically a machine gun on a cannon mount. Unlike the Spartans in this silly sim, The Zulu won by departing from their usual boxed phalanx formations by spreading out over the terrain using the cover of tall grasses and flanking on both sides in a horn attack thereby limiting their losses and overwhelming the British. In fact the British still had tens of thousands rounds left when they were overwhelmed. Like modern guns, the Gatling's had issues with overheating. As the Russians proved in WWII and even now in Ukraine, Bayonet charges of soldiers lacking any ammunition still works if you have more men then the enemy has bullets. As the modern infantryman has a 210 round loadout, a force of of at least 21,200 spearmen would beat 100 modern soldiers, assuming perfect shot accuracy.
No Gatling gun at Isandlwana, but the coastal column had one.
At Isandlwana, 750 British soldiers and 1000 colonial troops faced about 15,000 Zulus. Only around 100 of the colonials had firearms. The British rifles were single shot breech loaders, not magazine fed bolt action.
OTOH, a modern 100-man rifle company would have at least 20 beltfed machine guns, a similar number of grenade launchers and of larger explosive projectors, ie rocket launchers, recoilless rifles and/or antitank guided missiles.
Each MG would have some 700 rounds, while, as you note, each of ~80 riflemen would carry at least seven 30 round magazines. There would also be many pistols.
Even such a small company should also have a section of two or three 60mm mortars or 30-40mm automatic grenade launchers.
With proper tactics, the moderns could defeat the Spartans, even if reinforced with auxiliary archers. Rifles out range arrows, and modern body armor and helmets would stop them anyway.
The impressive thing is, this guy's PC didn't crash.
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Yea fr
Yeah lol mines starts lagging with 100 soldiers
@@slooriginal1727 mine will start dancing 🕺 makarina with tow soldiers 🤣🤣🤣🤣
🤣👌👌
Spartans, standing on a mountain of their dead friends:
"it's over, modern soldiers! We have the high ground!"
I didn’t know that there was drone footage of the Area 51 raid. 🤔
"It's over, Spartan soldiers -- you ARE the high ground!"
Modern soldiers: "You underestimate our powers!"
So stupid mags only hold 30 + 1 chamber if some have m249’s then they have 200 rounds in gun but you have to reload lmao so dumb the 100 men would be slaughtered
Now go tell Dad what a man you are!
This would have ended in less than 10 seconds by simply throwing 20,000 spears.
I don't know if a spear has the range or velocity to make it through a bulletproof vest.
@@Aerial_Imagingabsolutely lethal, the spears are. Spartans were bulked up big bros and could throw as far as 80m / 250 feet away, yup.
@@Aerial_Imagingif the vest if of kevlar, which it mostly is, then it's a game over. The sharp spears will rip the fabric, the fabric only stops small and blunt small rounds of ammo
@@karantikoo9302 Could be plated armor.
@@karantikoo9302 bullet speed is more than sound speed, and that vest was bulletproof
I thought the first thing the Spartans would have done was rain down on the modern soldiers with their spears 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Spartans speaking english is the most realistic thing to be seen on this video
problem
game diablo noises
and zoo tropic diseases. yes covid was zooinotic
With American accent....😁
Xd
Actually no that's exactly how it would go
Apparently, the modern soldiers had the "no friendly-fire" and "infinite ammo" cheats on.
And no reload
The modern soldiers didnt use any tactics they didnt even walk backwards to maintain the distance
No melting barrels
& Spartans decided against flanking or enveloping the enemy, you know tactics 101 when you outnumber the enemy by that amount.
And the no air support mode also was on, and the no grenades switch was on too.
Nobody:
WW1 Generals gaining 2 foot of worthless land :
Vimy Ridge in a nutshell
Jalyawala gagh
“War is some bullshit” -Alexander the great
😂
@@MizzzyMike which he done very aggressively 😂😂
Unlimited ammo
Spartans forget to throw spears.
Spartans: Using the bodies of you're dead comrades to get the high ground.
Obi-Wan approves
@@shendoboy Yup
General kenobi
😂😂😂
Also spartans: killing off half their whole military just to kill a company of soldiers
Well, the modern soldiers should have moved backwards while shooting, creating space..
Yeah, there was obviously a rule that the modern soldiers had to stay in that formation. That is not how that would've been fought in reality....considering modern soldiers are fighting Spartans. A first year cadet at west point would see this out come. They'd be spread out in fire teams with interlocking fields of fire. It eliminates the possibility of shooting the same spartan by multiple modern soldiers, simultaneously supporting eachother. It would force the Spartans to split up in to groups to attack the separate fire teams making it easier to eliminate 20000 Spartans in batches rather than all at once.
Also the spartans would have thrown their spears or use their numerical advantage to envelope the enemy which I don't see happening. Not a very good sim imo
and the spartans should have used their dead comrades as meat shields. It's super effective you know
But the Spartans could've surrounded them and attacked from the rear too. So not much strategy from either side
And use AOE weapon for that many targets..
They really have increased load-outs and mag capacity! Tactics: stand in place and just shoot, shoot through the soldiers in front of you. Just don’t move. Using the lowest number of rounds per minute at 700, there would be a total of 490,000 rounds fired during this engagement. They would almost be up to their necks in brass, oh and their barrels and some components would have melted before the halfway point of the firefight.
Some barrel melting after 5 minutes
😁😁
@@chaddufour7693 possibly mags getting a bit hot too... some mags exploding. I assume we can only see the tracer rounds in the video so the actual fire rate would be a lot greater than it seems.
Takin this too seriously man it’s a game
@@TriplD3 simulator. It’s not simulating very well.
"We have won, but at great cost."
"What?"
"... WE HAVE WON, BUT AT GREAT COST!"
"WHAT!?"
Spartan: “Excuse me general. I just had a thought. Might help. Any reason why we’re not flanking them?”
Or just throw them down in the first half min? :D
Fr fr 😂😂
Or throw the damn spear...🤔
or use the shields with a formation instead of only withstanding the bullets with their herculean muscles
@@ate7714 I don't think the shields would've held on for long.
These soldiers so modern, they didn't have to change mags.
They´re not modern at all, they´re from the 1980´s action movies...
Yeah, that the most un realistic thing in battle simulation video on youtube
@@mindtraveller100 nah, they from 2050
Gajab chu..y.p. hai yar
They can even disable friendly fire.
A strategy called " throw the damn spears all at once " would've helped.
We could have made kind of a shield wall with their round shields and use blessed archers!!!
@@cristianbenites4521 well the spartans didn't use bows because they believed it to be a cowards weapon because in battle they weren't killing their enimes up close, but if they all threw their spears it would have worked
Yes n use shields, they look like ant's now😂😂😂🐒
Why modern soldiers nit using granades
@@chadmappers5.2mviews54 a turkey shoot is more fun
"Spartans! What is your profession?"
"oof"
Her: he's probably thinking of another girl
Him: who would win a fight between 100 Soldiers versus 20,000 Spartans?
YES!
Exactly
🤣
Best comment ever, i used to play need for speed alot and ladys have a 6th sense and she kept asking me what im doing lol
I've never seen an M4 fire unlimited rounds like this before. Those magazines hold 1000 rounds each apparently. Never overheat either. Incredible!
😆😆😆
They’re using guns from movies
@@Notcosmicfire shotguns in movies be like: “I got 54 more rounds in this 2 round shotgun”
Могоп ва1т герогт🤦👎🤢💩🤮🖕
Not to mention the barrels melting
Spartan 1st - "how to die?"
Spartan 2nd - "follow me"
ua-cam.com/video/p5wjq_5lBGg/v-deo.html
Unreal: - time to reload
- hyperwarming guns
- throwing spear can devast modern
Also, frendly fire allows only few angles left
Correction: “ untrained modern soldiers vs 20000 untrained spartans”
Yh, exactly
+unlimited ammo
Haha
Spartans were also untrained because the back could have split off to the left and right to flank the soldiers. Instead they stand there idly.
In reality Spartans have no chance against modern weapons۔
After applying realism...
Soldiers: "we're out of ammo!"
Spartans: *domination*
Standard battle load is 210 rounds 7 magazines
@@la8309 Exactly, plenty of ammo.
@@la8309 And soldiers can and sometimes do carry a lot more than that.
Apply realism...ok they are in MRAPs and shooting 50. Cals easily wiping them out
Apply real realism:Automatic grenade launcher used.
Hypothetically, let’s say each of those soldiers had the standard combat load for the m4a1 (which is 7 mags with 30 rounds, 1 in the weapon and 6 on their carrier) each. That equals out to 210 rounds per soldier. There are 100 soldiers each with 210 rounds which equals to 21,000 rounds. So I guess technically if they never miss their mark and hit each one of the Spartans center mass this could theoretically work and they each would have 10 rounds to spare.
If you are talking about modern solders then they also have machines gun , launchers and graneds
how about the shoot position?
The Spartans didn't even throw their spears
That assumes the Spartans stand still.
GEN Gorman ran the numbers on a Soviet tank attack, and the key factor was the time it took for the tanks to cross the field as a function of speed. So US tanks could shoot 2x before they had to fall back or be overrun.
The USMC ran a test of expert shooters against moving targets.... the hit % was zero. The USMC is now investing heavily in combat ranges with active, moving targets.
Generally, based on combat data, far more enemy are wounded than killed. Just getting hit anywhere is not necessarily lethal.
Friendlyfire should be activated lol
Been done mate. The Zulu's won.
rest in peace to those brave men who sacrifices their lives to make this video.
Just step back when they were near and everybody would have been ok. Terrible leader. 😉
Jihad fii Sabilillah bro
🤣🤣🤣
I think they should have thrown all weapons sword on them
Epic...
Sun Tzu: Know thy terrain.
Spartans: Create high ground advantage.
Corpses
The fact that soldiers didn't even reload as if they had dipped their magazines in the Styx River has come up with a new definition of being insane 🗿
Lol
Могоп ва1т герогт🤦👎🤢💩🤮🖕
OMG 😂. No spear toss, no archers.
The spartans was Very clever indeed! They would never have faced projectiles without opposing them with a phalanx of shields.
“No Spartans have been harmed during the shooting. Of this clip.”
But there was plenty of shooting in this clip
@@billschlack6180
ikr😂
Hmmmm
Nor using shields as blockade
🔝🔝🔝Spartaaaa👊🏻🇦🇱👊🏻🇦🇱👊🏻🇦🇱
Glad that the spartans used 'no spear throwing policy" for this battle.
And the modern soldiers were blessed with infinite ammo. and no reload feature 😂😂
Well that just wouldn't be fair..
@@nomadames9538 Glad that modern solider can easily get out of the reach of their spears.....and they can easily kill 20000 without any casualties....😂....
Glad that modern solider only had guns....or this war will be over in second
Hahaha your right
And attacked symmetrically, and did not use military crawl until close to charge? And did not double up the shields for the first wave of attack?
The modern soldiers would run out of ammo and get slaughtered eventually. The weirdest thing about this is I didn't see any Spartans hold up their shields to block gunfire or throw a single spear. That would've been good to see cuz the Spartans were smart as well as tough AF too. Hopefully some other viewers thought the same thing I did.
I thought the same too
What’s the name of this Crazy Game ?😀😅
in games you dont need a real shield ...they just have a life bar
If you want get realistic which is actually very petty but modern soldier will simulate the combat before going into war besides morder soldiers would use tanks
The Spartans definitely wouldn't have taken that many losses. Just running straight at an enemy with better weapons is a tactic they'd soon change!
Not ONE grenade thrown, nor one barrel over-heated. “UNLIMITED AMMO!!” #SpartansNeverFlank 😂
As a former company grade infantry officer, I approve of this fighting formation.
Really? You approve of box formation with automatic weapons?
As a VFW, I'm glad you're a FORMER infantry officer.
Why wouldn't consider cross fire approach?
Agreed. I find that the safest place to shoot from is directly behind and between my battle buddie's shoulders. This way the bullet gets to taste blood BEFORE it hits the enemy.
Stay former
The fact that no one realized it was a joke lmfao
Bill gates in 1974 : I'm excited to see what people will do with computers in future
People of future :
edit : 326 like i've never got this many likes before
Uh
Ha
then,
Computer in future : ..
🔝🔝🔝Spartaaaa👊🏻🇦🇱👊🏻🇦🇱👊🏻🇦🇱
Soldier : Sir how many bullets do you want?
Commander : *infinity*
200 per soldier = 1 round for each spartan lol. Better hope you don't have any malfunctions
No gun can hold, from fuckin full autoing man, 😂 lol
No the right answer would be ,all of them.,gimme everything ya got.
@@exehans6507 it would melt in their hands hahahah
You wouldn't go full auto for the most part anyway. Full auto is more for suppressive fire, 3 feet off the ground side to side. You are far mor accurate with single shots.
What this proves: I made hot tea and after 7 minutes it’s ready to drink
If you ever feel useless , just remember about the spear Spartans were holding!!
The shields were much useless
And not forgetting the magazine with endless bullets 😆 what ever happened to reloading 🥱
Underrated comment
@@UECSoumyaRay hey simulator director 😅...make something thats less bullshit next time...😝😜🤪😛
@@jonathancarrillo1559 that's what i mean is a spear and a shield cannot beat bullets of that velocity..but what isn't realistic is creating a simulation of such whereby the guns aren't being reloaded by the soldiers if that was the case American soldiers wouldn't have to flea from Iraq, thus a magazine with endless supply of bullets isn fair huh so if someone were to create a simulation atleast try and be precise with the facts...and by the way i wouldn't downgrade a shield n a spear for both can do the same damage as a body armor and a bullet would..its just how you use it..in real life the spartans would have won because of numbers and reloading takes time ,1 round of spears thrown up boom all soldiers dead..hoo hoo ha haa! ✊
They are definitely missing the thousands of spears that would have been thrown by the Spartans that made it within 125 ft or so!
Yes. they would start throwing their spears. They wouldn't just keep rushing headlong into a hail of gunfire. They wouldn't know what gunfire was, but they'd see its' effect and act accordingly.
And the commander of the spartan is idiot. They forgot to flank.
Secondly the modern solider would ofto reload
And there weapon would also run hot
Yes they are missing the Spears and also the minigun mounted helicopters.
Let’s just appreciate the fact his pc did not lag with 20 thousand Spartans soldiers moving
It's the game, it's been optimized to the point where a good pc can run up to 200000 troops and lag or around 100000 with very little lag
@DT. Redgrave that's still a lot to compute, there are versions of this where there are millions moving, shooting and dying, creating obstacles to climb over and a lot of graphics without any lag.
@DT. Redgrave it's still a lot that has to be calculated and such.
Yes
i have lag when the spartans start die, on the vid.... O.o
1:06,
I love it how the dead Spartans turned out to be creating a 3 😂
The fact that not one spartan threw their spear is a little odd not to mention unlimited ammo and the guns melting after all that non stop shooting. Spartans could have just surrounded them from all angles it’d be over
Ofcourse and modern army would stay like this in the non sense block :D this is stupid at the first place.
That's only 200 kills per modern soldier- NO gun barrel would melt at quadruple that. Lol
400 years later
1 million Navy Seals vs 100 modern day soldiers
By then it will be Navy Seals against A.I. machines. How you say.... Terminators!
The "modern" soldiers can control time and all have special abilities like snapping their fingers and obliterating space itself.
And it’s the Spartans from Halo that’s re the modern day soldiers and they want their revenge
After 400 years I think soldiers have iron man shoot.
more like spetznas, gsg-9, ksk, or some
Ah yes unlimited ammo and the ability to shoot through your ally. The perfect strategy.
Dude its a game be smart
Hey man, the Spartans completely ran through each others corpses so it wasn’t one sided 🙃
@@ishowspeed363 he knows that, everyone knows that, but that kind of stuff should be coded in was his point, he just didn't word it properly for you to comprehend.
"yes its a simulation, but you have to at least account for basic factors to simulate something"
like if you simulate superman vs hulk, and in your simulation superman never flies or uses heat vision... its a bad simulation, and you jump in and say "dude its not real"... bro, we know its not real. thats not the point.
perhaps if i said, im gonna have a simulation of trump vs biden, but both of them had no hands and feet. get the idea yet? do i need to give you 50 more examples?
Spartan: "they have to reload sometime, right?!"
@@rustcohle3803 are you dumb
Imagine training your whole life to become a spartan and your first battle you are randomly shot and killed by a modern soldier with less than 6 months of training
The soldiers died at the end
@@liamc1102 still
Imagine never throwing your spear
*Reloading has left the chat
I know right?
*; - ;*
*friendly fire has left the chat*
Throwing javelin has left the chat
Spartan shield has left the chat...
When they said that high ground gives an advantage, I dont think they meant "create an high ground with the bodies of your comrades" but yet here we are. It worked
They could've survived better if they actually used their sheilds.
@@amazingfireboy1848 nah, I don't think that would have made huge difference. It might have helped but those shields can pe penetrated by arrows, against bullets, it doesn't stand a chance.
"It's over Anakin ! I have 18106 dead Obi-Wans as a high ground !"
And also the Spartans were duplicating numbers.
It is the way
Spartans: we must be the strongest fictional characters in centuries to come.
Anime: *spits on them*
I can't believe no one has mentioned the fact that the modern soldiers couldn't move. Even a steady slow march aft would have extended this whole thing a lot. And yes I understand the infinite ammo, and friendly fire off is ridiculous as well.
Can't move, and despite the unlimited ammo, miss WAY more than one would expect when shooting directly into a never ending crowd, a wall of people...
Спасибо что выдал вашу тактику.
Я русский шпион, и я передам в Кремль, как ваши солдаты намерены маневрировать на поле боя 🙂
Теперь наша непобедимая российская армия будет тренироваться, опираясь на эту информацию!
Великий лидер Владимир Путин наградит тебя Орденом Красной Звезды, и выплатит тебе одноразовую премию 500 рублей 👍
А почему спартанцы не стреляли? У них же были и стрелы и дротики.
Aft? Are they on a boat?
I'm no expert on armor but wouldn't the shields and the helmets prevent the bullets from penetrating?
We have won,but at what cost?
-spartans
50-60% of em probably
Reverse decimation
About 18106
the Spartan standing in the last be like i see this as an absolute win
Replicate 200 guns
The Spartans started winning once they took the high ground. Not having any high ground available from the start didn't stop them from creating some high ground.
Obi-Wan
Lol
They would have had a hard time walking through all of the bodies so they probably would have had time to reload
@@adamirishconundrum851 agreed assuming enough bullets. But also pretty sure Spartans would have been routed when they lost 5000 in a one sided firefight similar to the colonial wars.
@@adamirishconundrum851 Reload? How much Ammo were they realistically supposed to carry? Not to mention there is never a gap for reload time.
You should've let them do 'hand to hand' combat only.