ALLEN & HEATH AVANTIS SOLO REVIEW - THE BEST 64 CHANNEL CONSOLE?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 9 лип 2024
  • The Allen & Heath Avantis Solo has the potential to be very disruptive in the sub $10k audio console market. In this video I break down my thoughts on the system and show you why I chose to move our 9 remote campuses to Avantis.
    Intro 0:00
    Pros & Cons 8:35
    For more videos like this one, make sure you LIKE and SUBSCRIBE!
    Join the MDA Community Discord Server and get early teasers to videos, ask questions, and engage with our community. Click Here to Join for FREE: / discord
    Broadcast Template: www.mattdoesaudio.com/broadca...
    FREE X32 Template: www.mattdoesaudio.com/x32temp...
    #worship #churchproduction #livesound
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 20

  • @algilbert2347
    @algilbert2347 12 днів тому

    Use DCA spills to increase the number of "layers" available.

    • @MattDoesAudio
      @MattDoesAudio  12 днів тому

      I should have mentioned this in the video, so I’m pinning your comment. 100% this is the workaround.

  • @christiankansichi6622
    @christiankansichi6622 4 дні тому

    Did you consider the waves lv1? Also if you were consider making the sq your standard, how did it stack up against the wing?

    • @MattDoesAudio
      @MattDoesAudio  4 дні тому

      Yeah I looked into both of these options in the past few years and these are my thoughts: LV1 is a little too new school for comfort. Not a bad system at all, but the benefits don’t outweigh potential points of failure at this scale. I wanted a traditional hardware solution with a modern toolset.
      I never considered the wing as a viable option. We have one at a campus and I dislike nearly everything about it. Music tribe’s customer support is nonexistent nowadays. (I actually have 2 wing units bc of failing touch screens and parts availability. At least now while one is in the shop, I have the other one deployed) I wanted to like it, but it’s trying to do too much with not enough horsepower. The wing tried to reinvent the wheel while all we really wanted was an X48/X32 Pro. Wing is also too large for most of our production booths anyway.
      I like the SQ. It’s not perfect, but most of the early bugs it had have been worked out through software. Build quality is really good. The custom fader banks are great. The FX sound a thousand times better than anything from behringer as well. Not a massive deal to most people but 96khz is pretty cool at that price point as well.
      The only advantage I would give the wing is the ability to use the Midas Pro stage boxes like the DL251. I’m a sucker for the Midas preamps and the absolutely sound more musical than any of the A&H pres.

  • @andygriffiths7230
    @andygriffiths7230 14 днів тому

    You should buy the IP8 fader wing for your console.

  • @drummerboy100jh
    @drummerboy100jh 13 днів тому +1

    I remember when the Avantis was 8,999, the solo should be 6,999. Pricing has gone crazy!

    • @MattDoesAudio
      @MattDoesAudio  13 днів тому

      I know.. it's really wild to think about.

    • @drummerboy100jh
      @drummerboy100jh 13 днів тому

      Have you worked with the 64 channel studiolive III mixer? Half the price. Seems easy for volunteers, especially running it with a 12 inch ipad or bigger windows tablet.

    • @MattDoesAudio
      @MattDoesAudio  13 днів тому +1

      @@drummerboy100jh I have and I was really disappointed 😔 I really wanted to like it but the UI is a nightmare to use imo. The one I used was super choppy and would take multiple seconds to respond to inputs on the screen. It’s possible that’s been fixed in software updates, but I would personally steer clear of the studio live system as a whole. That was just my experience though.

    • @drummerboy100jh
      @drummerboy100jh 13 днів тому

      Thats aggravating when new mixers come out while their still working out the bugs in the software. The ones I know using it have not had issues like that since updates.
      Im curious was that on apple or windows software?
      Thanks for your input.

    • @MattDoesAudio
      @MattDoesAudio  13 днів тому

      @@drummerboy100jh I’m just talking about the actual mixer itself. It was really odd, it almost felt like a virtual machine with how laggy it was.

  • @therealcalebrz
    @therealcalebrz 14 днів тому

    thoughts on the 225 vs full size avantis? You've been mixing on the 225, avantis would seem like a downgrade for an experienced engineer?

    • @MattDoesAudio
      @MattDoesAudio  13 днів тому

      Yeah, I should’ve clarified. We are not changing that system out. I was referring to our remote campuses. The 225 is much nicer haha

  • @MrWillihelmdueck
    @MrWillihelmdueck 14 днів тому

    Have you considered LV1?

    • @MattDoesAudio
      @MattDoesAudio  13 днів тому +1

      I have! It's a really cool system. It just wouldn't be something I would implement at our remote campuses tbh. I have personally considered investing in it for myself though. I need to get my hands on one to see if it would suite my workflow.

    • @MrWillihelmdueck
      @MrWillihelmdueck 13 днів тому

      I think the scalability of it is plus for remote locations. You could get a small setup and upgrade control, channel count and IO as you go. Also I think it is easy to train volunteers and as it is a PC, you can always remote into it and fix any software issue they have.
      If you have any questions, feel free to reach out.

  • @asilva_media
    @asilva_media 14 днів тому +1

    great video! i will say, the avantis full size lags worse than the SQ with dyn8 open, AMM, or switching fader pages it hangs a decent amount and it forgets scenes a lot. but never crashes.

    • @MattDoesAudio
      @MattDoesAudio  14 днів тому

      Dannnngggg yeah I’m optimistic with Avantis being more from the dlive family, but I wish they could get a handle on this. It’s really stressful to use a system that “feels” like it’s struggling even if it’s functionally ok. Most of our campuses wouldn’t be stressing the cpu too much on Avantis so 🤞🏻

    • @asilva_media
      @asilva_media 14 днів тому

      @@MattDoesAudio that's facts. i think the audio processing FPGA is totally separate from the surface controller too, ive had the surface freeze but audio was still okay and it came back after a few seconds. plus with the solo its only driving 1 screen and less faders so it might be faster too.