Why Quartz watches are probably the best choice for you and your EDC

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 тра 2016
  • I've now talked about how mechanical watches work, and how quartz watches work, and I've done some reviews of some gems on both sides. Today, I'm issuing my final verdict.
    Mechanical watches make great jewelry, and they're pretty cool, but if you want a functional timepiece for your everyday carry (EDC), you're probably better off going with a Quartz watch.
    How Quartz Watches work: • The Nick Shabazz take ...
    How Mechanical Watches work: • The Nick Shabazz take ...
    Review of the Casio Oceanus: • The Casio Oceanus OCW-...
    Review of the Sinn 104 St Sa I: • The Sinn 104 St Sa I W...
  • Навчання та стиль

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1 тис.

  • @spalkin
    @spalkin 6 років тому +220

    The mechanical watch world didn't call the 70's "The Crisis" for nothing. Quartz wasn't only different, it was really good.

  • @Jumpboots_Jamstrang
    @Jumpboots_Jamstrang 8 років тому +84

    I have a 1953 Omega from my grandfather, a 1989 Casio from my father, and my own Casio GShock. Love them all, you like what you like. Get whatever speaks to you.

    • @MaloCeeEss
      @MaloCeeEss 4 роки тому +4

      puppetmaster983 right on! The man makes the watch, not the other way around.

  • @drewski5150
    @drewski5150 7 років тому +17

    I would LOVE to see more watch channels spend more time exploring quartz. The bias towards automatics, whilst horologically interesting, means that quartz is often left out entirely.

  • @ianmedium
    @ianmedium 5 років тому +26

    One thing about quartz being dead. Unless it’s ultra cheap where it’s more economical to replace it most other Miyota, Seiko, ETA and Ronda movements away from their base lines can actually be repaired and indeed are often repaired and the truth is, unless a battery leaks or water gets in then nothing really ever goes wrong. I have about twenty quartz watches from the 1970’s and to this day with a basic clean and lube of the gears once every ten years and battery change obviously they work perfectly and keep the stated timekeeping forty odd years later!
    We have reached the point in quartz history where the reasons not to buy one have become pretty much redundant and as well, we have reached the point where there is half a century of history to enjoy with quartz and it is a heck of a story!

  • @zecesizece
    @zecesizece 7 років тому +336

    I've not actually watched this video fully yet, but 10 seconds in - this voice is freakin' AMAZING! Just narrate Al Capone's life story already!!!

    • @eddiethinker1775
      @eddiethinker1775 7 років тому +7

      I know! I've been listening to this guys reviews forever and he really kicks ass at the commentary.

    • @shrizor
      @shrizor 7 років тому +18

      It's a beautiful thing!

    • @Lagggerengineering
      @Lagggerengineering 7 років тому +2

      EXACTLY what I thought!

    • @ostriciemata
      @ostriciemata 6 років тому +7

      Be careful you may end up sleeping with the fishes

    • @HouseholdDog
      @HouseholdDog 6 років тому +4

      Bada boom Bada bing

  • @lsbrother
    @lsbrother 8 років тому +49

    Bought my Casio Seamaster about 14 years ago for about £20. Changed battery once - cost about £1 - easy enough to do myself. Bought new strap about 5 years ago - about £2. Gains 0.57 secs +/- 0.01 secs a day - every day! Fully expect to have same watch in 10 years time - why not?

    • @michaelwertz6689
      @michaelwertz6689 Рік тому

      Casio Seamaster? Is that another name for the Marlin aka Duro?

  • @spektrograf
    @spektrograf 7 років тому +105

    Wow, seriously one of the best video statements of both sides of the equation with a clear statement of intent! Very well thought through and presented, Nick! I don't land on either side of the debate because I agree with your line of thinking-that it just depends what you're looking for in a watch. Thanks for putting it together and putting it out there!

    • @jayzenitram9621
      @jayzenitram9621 7 років тому +6

      Same. I have three mechanicals (2 glycine and 1 seiko) and one quartz (citizen eco drive world timer). Love them all equally (mostly :) ).

  • @al14711n
    @al14711n 6 років тому +19

    in this video, the mechanical watch was already running one minute slower

  • @13noman1
    @13noman1 8 років тому +14

    Really enjoy my Citizen Ecodrive (solar), Keeps great time, I don't worry about batteries and I don't worry over much about knocking it around.

  • @srobart
    @srobart 6 років тому +9

    I agree with everything you said there. It was quite the hump to get over, for me, to buy a watch that kept LESS accurate time when I bought my first mechanical/automatic watch, especially since I already had atomic watches and I knew they're always going to be dead-on accurate. That being said, there's something really COOL about knowing that inside my watch is a beautiful set of gears, springs, jewels and it's made the same way (mechanically-speaking) that people have been making watches for hundreds of years. I feel like it's a mini homage to days gone by, every time I put one of my mechanical or automatic watches on. Mechanicals, in particular, feel this way, because I go through the act of winding them in the morning when I sit down to drink a cup of coffee. I always imagine my grandfather or great-grandfather doing the same with their watches, back in their time. So I think there will always be a place for mechanicals and automatics, even though the convenience, value and accuracy of quartz will always be better for keeping time and EDC.

    • @Xanduur
      @Xanduur Рік тому +1

      I used to feel that way, but I got better and stopped worrying about such things.

    • @phildo864
      @phildo864 6 місяців тому

      @@Xanduurwhat did you stop worrying about?

  • @highwind1369
    @highwind1369 2 роки тому +2

    Dude, the manually moved sheet over the paper had to be an homage to mechanical watches. You certainly have the skill to do that bullet point sheet in edit. But no, you did it with an on set effect.
    I'm five years late to this video, but please tell me that this was indeed a creative choice...

  • @paulbrady8107
    @paulbrady8107 6 років тому +1

    Nick you're reviews are as close to perfection as need be,fair and impartial thank you for taking the time to help me make a good choice for me.👍

  • @watchlover8361
    @watchlover8361 7 років тому +16

    Great post. Quartz watches are a must have.

  • @3hutp
    @3hutp 7 років тому +34

    Quartz watches are the smartest choice, no doubt. When it comes to accuracy, nothing can beat a radio-controlled quartz watch, and if it's solar-powered, like many Citizen models, than you've got the most practical setting you can think of. Mechanical watches are not practical to be honest. Of course, they can run for quite long, but they should be serviced around every five years - which is way less than the time a solar watch can run without needing to replace it's capacitor. So, quartz watches are rational choices. That being said, people are not always rational. I love my mechanical watch, because it is - mechanical. It has a different feeling. I love how it rewinds itself, and, most importantly how it doesn't require electricity at all. An electronic watch feels like 'cheating' to me. Especially smartwatches - you can program anything into a computer or a chip. So what's the big deal? But a mechanical watch is like a little architecture, the masterpiece of engineering. A timepiece that works using only springs and cogwheels and other tiny components. It simply amazes me.

    • @94jmbottaro
      @94jmbottaro 5 років тому

      well i have to disagree with your ''rational'' view point. wether it is solar powered or regular quartz, it will eventually die one day. whereas your mechanical watch you just go and repair it. and every 5 years?? what kind of mechanical watches do you own???

    • @BasedBill
      @BasedBill 4 роки тому +5

      @@94jmbottaro Everything dies one day. The difference is a lifetime supply of watch batteries can be bought for about 10.00, and a inexpensive quartz is absolutely, positively more accurate than a mechanical Chronometer watch. You can also replace the entire movement of most quartz watches for less than the price of one mechanical watch servicing.
      I own 6 Concords, 3 quartz, 2 automatic and 1 manual-wind. I do prefer the two Automatic Concords over any other watch period, because the two of them are over 50 years old and still ticking accurately. That being said, there is no logical reason to pick a mechanical over a quartz when it comes to cost and practicality.

    • @Starstreak170
      @Starstreak170 4 роки тому +2

      @@94jmbottaro Any decent quartz watch will run decades with just battery changes and no other maintenance. Loads of 1970s quartz watches are still working.

    • @YY-wu7et
      @YY-wu7et 4 роки тому +2

      @@94jmbottaro "whereas your mechanical watch you just go and repair it"
      Yes, by gradually replacing more and more of it's parts. So the only reason it doesn't "die" is because it's being replaced piece by piece. And every piece costs as much as a hundred new quartz watches. Yeah that sounds "rational".

    • @entroheat
      @entroheat 4 роки тому

      Y k Y k a mechanical watch replaced with many pieces is a Frankenstein watch and is worth nothing but garbage that’s a point to consider

  • @1928flash
    @1928flash 7 років тому +1

    Thanks for the video Nick. Very informative and I enjoyed the delivery.

  • @Lazarev666
    @Lazarev666 4 роки тому +41

    From my 20+ years experience of wearing watch all the time, simple Japanese or Swiss quartz movement are ways to go.
    Solar, radio, gps are nice, but I found them pretty useless in real life situations.
    Forget about grandchildren wearing your mechanical watch, woollen socks or watching your VHS collection while listening vinyl records. Watches are not long time investments, they are just time telling jewelry.
    My Checklist:
    1) Metal body and bracelet (best bracelets are solid and with screws)
    2) Sapphire or at least Hardlex crystal
    3) Screw down crown and back cover
    4) crown guard is nice thing to have
    5) quartz Miyota, Seiko or Ronda movement, try to avoid mechanics because they are obsolete

    • @nguyenuchuy8807
      @nguyenuchuy8807 4 роки тому +2

      thank brother

    • @jlg395
      @jlg395 3 роки тому +1

      @@David-vb8tg Peasants are always the wisest.

    • @strongherd
      @strongherd 3 роки тому +1

      @@David-vb8tg what a moronic slave you are

    • @duvalpenny100
      @duvalpenny100 2 роки тому

      Your argument can be applied to sooooo many hobbies. We also realistically don't need these crazy high quality knives, but look at us.

    • @Lazarev666
      @Lazarev666 2 роки тому

      @@duvalpenny100
      Yeah
      That is true 😅

  • @crabbyhayes1076
    @crabbyhayes1076 7 років тому +41

    This video was a real pleasure to watch.

  • @gbns1
    @gbns1 5 років тому +23

    "I'm just gonna go get the papers, get the papers"

  • @thebudkellyfiles
    @thebudkellyfiles 8 років тому +3

    Excellent vid. As an owner of two Rolex's, and as a person who sold them both, I am now a wearer and collector of quartz watches. Durable, accurate, trouble free, and just as beautiful as any mechanical watch. Thanks.

  • @DanielGarcia-fk4pn
    @DanielGarcia-fk4pn 7 років тому +2

    Wow this really helped me out, this is a kind of long video that I actually watched to the end I mean you get straight to the point you make good points and it makes sense to me. If I had to rate this it would me 10/10. Wow great video. You just got yourself another subscriber.

  • @shahirbear
    @shahirbear 7 років тому +30

    Just got my first mechanical, SKX009...can't wait to get the SARB017 Alpinist....

    • @itsallrobbish
      @itsallrobbish 7 років тому +2

      Ugly Puppy that's a top choice right there, the SKX will last a lifetime.

    • @zzyzxzee6374
      @zzyzxzee6374 7 років тому +2

      Have the 007

    • @BlackFoxFalcon
      @BlackFoxFalcon 7 років тому +4

      Automatic watches rock. Just got myself the Tag Heuer Carrera Calibre 1887. Nice, large watch that will probably outlast me.

    • @APPLEPIE978
      @APPLEPIE978 7 років тому +1

      I wish my wrist was big enough for the 009 had to settle with the 013 :(

    • @HMJunkie
      @HMJunkie 7 років тому +2

      The Alpinist is damn nice.

  • @mikehoward5004
    @mikehoward5004 7 років тому +7

    The Bulova precisionist gives the best of both worlds. Super smooth sweep and 10 sec/year accuracy. The Wilton, Marine Star and Snorkel are my favorites.

    • @mikehoward5004
      @mikehoward5004 7 років тому

      However, I do have more of an emotional connection with my mechanicals. Seagull has the ST-19 chrono mov. that is gorgeous and low cost.

  • @theparkerstudio
    @theparkerstudio 6 років тому

    Best watch video I've seen in a while. Both types of watches are amazing -- enjoy them. Subscribed.

  • @samd.5203
    @samd.5203 7 років тому

    Great great video. I love the practicality without any of the snobbery. I love both movements and can appreciate the benefits of a quartz. thanks for the work.

  • @FurrowedSon
    @FurrowedSon 8 років тому +7

    Nice video - it is, indeed, a beautiful thing.
    I've got a mix of quartz and mechanical, mostly low end pieces, with one higher end mechanical - they've each got their own strengths and weaknesses. But you're dead right: my £7 Casio F-91W (which, by the way, I love) takes a massive and unceremonious dump all over my high end mechanical that cost ££££s in terms of accuracy and, to be honest, even features.
    The F-91W has a stopwatch, and displays both the day and date, whereas the mechanical is date only. Also, 10 year battery life, versus 40-50 hour power reserve. And it doesn't matter how long it's been left in the dark, I can still read the time using the built in light.
    Still, mechanical has its charms, and I'll generally wear mechanicals as often as quartz. Funny thing: I *really* like quartz when it's married to a digital display, but I'm less fond of it with an analogue dial (G-Shocks get a pass though). That's just a preference anyway: still can't deny that a quartz is far and away more accurate and durable.

    • @ronch550
      @ronch550 7 років тому

      FurrowedSon I just got a Casio AE-1200WHD (which Nick reviewed recently). It's a digital quartz watch and I gotta say I just love watching the digits increment. it's been a loooonnnggg time since I last had a digital watch. Having worn mostly an automatic for many years I am amazed at this $30 Casio watch.

  • @vishy
    @vishy 8 років тому +4

    Really enjoyed watching your vid! I think you are bang on, and love the accent! Are you from Boston? Anyway, I digress :) ... I adore my Omega Speedmaster Professional Moonwatch (Mechanical) - it's my pride and joy and just love its history, winding it everyday, and it's gorgeous design. But if I want functional, I love wearing my Swiss Army (Quartz) day in day out - nice, light, don't get stressed damaging it, and it keeps time perfectly. So mechanical or quartz? ... i say both :)

  • @johnsmith-gs4qf
    @johnsmith-gs4qf 6 років тому

    This is the very best video I have ever seen discussing the pros & cons of mechanical and quartz watches! Keep up the great informative videos!

  • @climbjay
    @climbjay 5 років тому

    GREAT review. Very informative and to the point 👍🏼

  • @MerricMaker
    @MerricMaker 7 років тому +14

    Further concern with getting a mechanical watch: Finding reputable service is going to become more difficult and more expensive.

    • @waktosha7378
      @waktosha7378 6 років тому +1

      MerricMaker Unfortunately that is very true!

  • @MeowMeow-ij9dk
    @MeowMeow-ij9dk 7 років тому +17

    I wear a quartz Victorinox INOX for work. For everyday use I prefer the accuracy of quartz. But for dress watches and show pieces that tickle my love for horology, automatics and manual wind are definitely better.
    Both have their place and I don't subscribe to the idea that "serious" collections don't contain quartz pieces. Just stay away from MVMT and Invicta, and we can be friends.

    • @slenpaiwashere3599
      @slenpaiwashere3599 5 років тому +5

      Meow Meow invicta has some pretty good budget divers

    • @Gasta1983
      @Gasta1983 4 роки тому

      What's wrong with Invicta praytell without parroting watch snobs and just based on your personal experience?

    • @Foxtrot-jr5qu
      @Foxtrot-jr5qu 4 роки тому +2

      @@Gasta1983 There are plenty of Chinese brand watches such as - Pagani Design and Parnis that offer pretty much the same Rolex homages as Invicta does (Invicta is also made in China) like the same NH35 movement but they also have sapphire crystal and ceramic bezel for around 60$, while the Invicta pro diver goes for almost double than that.

  • @xlenau
    @xlenau 8 років тому

    You really said everything that can be said on this comparison. It was a pleasure to watch

  • @kyleweber1994
    @kyleweber1994 8 років тому

    First-time watcher, loved the video. You brought great points to both sides of the argument. The type of movement really depends on what you want for your watch.

  • @GaryKatz
    @GaryKatz 7 років тому +4

    Very interesting and helpful. Thanks. Since Seiko introduced the quartz watch in 1969, the watch world has been forced to reassess the reasons why people buy a timepiece. Quartz watches have evolved, however, and the innovations are quite remarkable...like the movement in the Grand Seiko or the tech advances of the Astron.
    The Swiss have responded by developing the Ronda and other quartz movements, which are good, but the focus has been on how to still get the big bucks by using the brand name owner of Swiss watches to artificially make the price for a quartz watch skyrocket. I would prefer to buy a Grand Seiko mechanical movement than a Rado quartz overpriced pretty watch...any day of the week. That's my 2 cents worth. Thanks. Doc

  • @matthewdorman791
    @matthewdorman791 7 років тому +4

    I understand your points and agree for the most part but I will say that you can find quality, inexpensive mech watches. For instance, I have a Seiko 5 (SNK809) that run me well under 100$ and it works quite well for my needs. It has a day and a date complication, which is quite convenient, and it is about as accurate as any other mech watch. Great choice for someone that wants that high-end experience without the high-end price.

    • @unkono
      @unkono 2 роки тому

      Don't forget about the Russian Vostok Amphibia.

  • @masumkhan4040
    @masumkhan4040 6 років тому

    Wow. Great video. Thanks for changing my mind about getting involved with watches. Phew!

  • @chrisb6003
    @chrisb6003 6 років тому

    Very informative. I really enjoyed your comparison.

  • @thenewyorkpauls
    @thenewyorkpauls 7 років тому +5

    I concede the quartz watches I've had are more accurate than the automatic mechanical ones, but the latter are what really fuel my love of horology beyond a simple desire to have something that looks cool on my wrist. In an era where so few people even have the need for a watch, and even then will settle for a solid rubber Casio do-all most of the time, mechanical dive watches are a diminishing art form some are enthusiastic/romantic about, like manual transmission in a car or audiophiles'/musicians' penchant for vacuum tube amplifiers. There are more efficient and reliable alternatives to all those things which are also more affordable, but they don't provide an identical experience... and you don't necessarily need to buy a car or amplifier or watch for anybody else, so just follow your own interest in the niche and nobody will ever be able to prove you bought the wrong kind of watch.

  • @JellyForSale
    @JellyForSale 8 років тому +4

    The perfect EDC watch for utility's sake is a solar quartz watch. My beater is a Casio solar powered quartz movement. I'm not sure exactly how long it'll last, but far longer than a traditional quartz(I would hope).

    • @jimboutilier7552
      @jimboutilier7552 8 років тому +4

      I like solar quartz too. But their rechargeable cells will loose capacity over time and eventually require replacement. They tend to be soldered in so replacement is a bit.more involved. Average life is 8-10 years but can be shorter or longer.

    • @mauricioarte2
      @mauricioarte2 8 років тому +2

      I have an Citizen Eco Drive Perpetual calendar with a long list of features, and yes the capacitor lasts about 10 years and you cannot replace it yourself, it has to be done by Citizen, mine cost me $90 to replace. But then again, the watch itself cost at the time $386 plus tax. Now, the same watch cost more around $400-$500 price range. But they are very nice and I am happy with it.

    • @Maddoxxx
      @Maddoxxx 8 років тому +2

      mate, you cant never go wrong with a citizen eco drive...
      it's a piece of excellency

    • @coffeeisgood102
      @coffeeisgood102 8 років тому

      I have a whole collection of Casio solar Pathfinders I bought years ago. Except for one, they all work fine and keep perfect time, as they are radio controlled. I just don't wear them anymore as I prefer to have a mechanical watch on my wrist. Yours should still be going ten years from now.

    • @spiljhu8084
      @spiljhu8084 7 років тому

      Harold Bullock

  • @BloodySunnday
    @BloodySunnday 7 років тому

    Thank you very much for sharing your insights with us. Great video.

  • @foesfly3047
    @foesfly3047 7 років тому

    This was really an excellent breakdown of considerations. I've built a modest collection of Tissot quartz watches that to me are entirely for jewelry value (I wear no other jewelry at all... only a watch). Fortunately Tissot offers what to me is a considerable variety of very nice styles with sufficient levels of detail and design to satisfy that purpose for under $1000. Recently finding a limited edition Tissot mechanical model that I find very appealing, I'll just have to decide whether the fact that it will stop working between wearings is worth the additional aesthetic detail value and the undeniable cool factor of owning such an example of awesome precision engineering. Thank you very much Sir.

  • @consciouspirate
    @consciouspirate 7 років тому +3

    I'm a mechanical guy through and through and nothing can change that. I clicked on this video just to hear you speak lol.

  • @AndrewArtajos
    @AndrewArtajos 7 років тому +4

    Good points @NickShabazz
    Makes me think why am I keep spending a lot on mechanical watches???

  • @jpoupon66
    @jpoupon66 4 роки тому +1

    Mechanical watches are for people whom do not care about being on time...... they are more like art in your house,you don't really need it but it is nice to look at.....GREAT VIDEO,CLEAR AND OBJECTIVE!!

  • @Seffsqautch
    @Seffsqautch 3 роки тому

    This video was extremely helpful for so many reasons! It gave me so much peace of mind- thanks!

  • @NightlifeSux
    @NightlifeSux 5 років тому +14

    To sum up an 18 minute video: quartz watches are always more accurate than mechanical watches and usually cheaper. That's why they're the best EDC watch choice.

  • @dvamateur
    @dvamateur 8 років тому +51

    I would have to sort of disagree on lack of variety among the quartz watches. Even within brands like Citizen or Seiko alone, you are likely to find something that you're looking for, because the selection is bewilderdering.

    • @jackka82
      @jackka82 7 років тому +10

      You're right, but I think he means the number of brands creating high-end quartz watches vs. the number of brands creating high-end mechanical watches.

    • @NickShabazz
      @NickShabazz  7 років тому +9

      Yep, that's what I'm after. You can get a ton of $10-movement Quartz out there. But in terms of perpetual calendars, or solar charging, or high-accuracy, you're looking at 2 or 3 brands with maybe 30 models.

    • @dvamateur
      @dvamateur 7 років тому +7

      +Nick Shabazz Man, Seiko and Citizen watches abound in those type of features. I have Seiko kinetic with perpetual calendar, Seiko solar chronograph, Citizen solar chronograph WITH perpetual calendar. There are plenty of models.

    • @NickShabazz
      @NickShabazz  7 років тому +3

      Yep. I'll be reviewing more of them soon (Got a Citizen Signature Perp. Diver on the wrist now). But you're still looking at one or two brands, and limited complications (GMT?!).

    • @jackka82
      @jackka82 7 років тому +1

      Andrew Piatek Plenty indeed. Still less, mathematically.

  • @stephonjames1038
    @stephonjames1038 5 років тому

    Great points! Thank you for making this video

  • @javajoba
    @javajoba 7 років тому +1

    Nice explanation, I'm a auto-mechanical kind of guy, but have a new appreciation for quartz now.

  • @MrRaphaelcaluwe
    @MrRaphaelcaluwe 7 років тому +3

    On the functionality I aggree. I own a mechanical omega seamaster. It is COSC certified. Nevertheless after a month i'm behind. There's no arguing about it, machanical watches don't run as accurately as quartz.
    However, it's the same as pocketknives...
    I own multiple high end custom knives (bob terzuola, brad southard, walter randolph etc ...) I love carrying them and playing with them. However, none of these knives is functionally up to par to my manix2 lightweight. My 80$ spyderco is lighter and cuts better than any of them.
    There's just such a difference of pride of ownership and enjoyment!

  • @barreltech8949
    @barreltech8949 7 років тому +31

    i love quartz watches. i rather change the battery than pay for service fees

    • @booxwee3804
      @booxwee3804 6 років тому +4

      Thats not the point, people have mechanical because they are more beautiful, they are kind of like art

    • @booxwee3804
      @booxwee3804 5 років тому

      Tom Smith Do you own a mechanical watch? Probably not because I dont know anyone who doesnt own a mechanical just because they dont want to service it. A bad quartz watch will eventually need to have a replacement as well..

    • @markt9332
      @markt9332 5 років тому +2

      @@booxwee3804 art that you cant see and paid triple for. Great.

    • @booxwee3804
      @booxwee3804 5 років тому

      @@markt9332 Haha just perfect, my automatic watch has a glass display back :)

    • @booxwee3804
      @booxwee3804 5 років тому

      @@markt9332 And yes I would rather pay $350 for an automatic, since the quartz movements cost on wholesale like $2 but the watches still cost $100-200 for a well knows brand.

  • @safari2411
    @safari2411 7 років тому

    awesome analysis. thanks so much, nick!

  • @guitarmike1968
    @guitarmike1968 8 років тому +2

    Cheers to you Nick. It's so awesome seeing an honest opinion regarding this issue. I'm a huge watch collector of over 43 years now. I own several mechanical watches. Too many perhaps. I too think they are just really cool. But at the same time when timing really matters I will go for a Quartz watch. Or even a Gshock. There's nothing wrong with Quartz and the collectors who tell you I would never own a Quartz watch are simply stretching the truth. Cause I know many many collectors who own Rolex but at the same time will wear a Much cheaper Quartz for rough activities and such. Thanks again for posting an honest well thought out video.

    • @NickShabazz
      @NickShabazz  8 років тому

      Glad you liked it! And I agree, mountain biking is no place for a Yacht-Master!

  • @Dodgecharger1212
    @Dodgecharger1212 8 років тому +5

    I have a citizen echo drive with a perpetual calendar I've had it for about 6-7 years and no issues whatsoever and it was like 450$

    • @NickShabazz
      @NickShabazz  8 років тому

      Yep. Those are solid gems, if you can find one where you like the styling!

  • @gtrmusic69
    @gtrmusic69 6 років тому +6

    "...and that's just a beautiful thing..."

  • @sumzok
    @sumzok 4 роки тому

    Great video, thanks for all the information.

  • @Xanduur
    @Xanduur 6 років тому +2

    After watching many of your informative videos, I can say with certainty, "They are beautiful things."

  • @shahirbear
    @shahirbear 7 років тому +7

    You'd probably like the Seiko Sarb033

  • @saodavi6267
    @saodavi6267 8 років тому +122

    Mechanical watches are for people who care about watches and/or horology.
    Quartz watches are for people who care about what time it is or want a bunch of complications to enhance the functionality at no additional cost. Basically, they want a trouble-free, low maintenance EDC tool as opposed to a mechanical marvel.

    • @NickShabazz
      @NickShabazz  8 років тому +15

      +SaoDavi Amen brother, testify!

    • @ZesPak
      @ZesPak 7 років тому +10

      Am I allowed to love both?
      I love my SKX and Seiko 5, but I also appreciate my Databank and Timex Explorer.

    • @ZesPak
      @ZesPak 6 років тому +2

      Wow, salty much? Maybe he actually taught himself English like most people in the world?

    • @cazgerald9471
      @cazgerald9471 6 років тому

      sycater I think you just made SaoDavi's point.

    • @theturtlesmasher
      @theturtlesmasher 6 років тому +3

      Watches don't cause social disconnect and brain tumors. Some will still prefer to wear them over carrying a radiation phone everywhere they go.

  • @williamlopez45
    @williamlopez45 8 років тому

    nice video. a no nonsense straight forward review. lots of good points between mechanical and quartz.

  • @carloscandido3621
    @carloscandido3621 6 років тому +1

    I loved this video! Good thoughts and statements

  • @TheMCCraftingTable
    @TheMCCraftingTable 7 років тому +297

    in my opinion, mechanical watches just feel "alive" . and how it depends on us for power reserve creates an emotional attachment to the watch itself. it's more like.. carrying a small pet on your wrist

    • @Chris-wj4ze
      @Chris-wj4ze 7 років тому +17

      That's a bizarre simile. Carrying a small pet on your wrist?

    • @jayzenitram9621
      @jayzenitram9621 7 років тому +43

      Yeah, like a tamagoochi - if you don't tend to it, it dies.

    • @zzyzxzee6374
      @zzyzxzee6374 7 років тому +3

      Good

    • @yourbestfriend194
      @yourbestfriend194 7 років тому +3

      hahaha good point!!!

    • @7Lukibi99Tore7
      @7Lukibi99Tore7 7 років тому +14

      For quartz crystal wristwatch owners there is just as strong an emotional attachment to a superbly designed quartz crystal wristwatch as there is to an excellently designed mechanical wristwatch for owners of mechanical wristwatches.

  • @conradotv
    @conradotv 7 років тому +4

    Nice video! Very through.. One thing you could add to the mechanical Advantages list: Resell value. You'll usually get a price much closer to what you paid for with a mechanical watch (specially if it is a traditional brand) than what you would for a Quartz watch.

  • @DarkAngel-oq5ox
    @DarkAngel-oq5ox 4 роки тому

    Extremely informative and to the point, thanks.

  • @marcjohnson4181
    @marcjohnson4181 6 років тому

    "Made of meteorite slices"!!!! The best line ever!!!! Love your videos.

  • @tapemaster8252
    @tapemaster8252 7 років тому +9

    my omega speedmaster is being serviced right now, cost 630 dollars, I don't think I've worn it a month in the 13 years of ownership, I would have to say it's because I'm a blue collar worker. Great video and well said, Peace!

    • @KevAlberta
      @KevAlberta 4 роки тому +2

      Wear the damn thing you fool!!! Who are you saving it for ??? The next guy?? I’m enjoying my watch as much as I can. I paid for it. I sure as hell am gonna wear it

    • @folksurvival
      @folksurvival 4 роки тому

      @@KevAlberta As he said, he does real work for a living, but yeah he could probably still wear it more often if he has days off.

    • @KevAlberta
      @KevAlberta 4 роки тому

      unlockthepower true

  • @ctrskistad
    @ctrskistad 6 років тому +6

    I have a 10 year old Timex Ironman triathlon watch with the origanal battery. Beat that!

    • @nightknight9415
      @nightknight9415 5 років тому +2

      I have a 14yr old Casio w/ original battery. ; )

  • @royroy333
    @royroy333 2 роки тому

    Wow Nick, I have to say, I've been watching dozens of video's in the past few days in irder to try to understand where I stand horologically, and yours here was the best, most informational and modest, and least snobbish of them all.

  • @crunchynutcornflakes
    @crunchynutcornflakes 7 років тому

    Really good review thanks Nick

  • @mohammadziad3556
    @mohammadziad3556 7 років тому +4

    automatic watches is just beautiful and you can find them cheaper that 500 dollars like swatch system51 or orient bambino, or Seiko sky those watches at the range of 200 dollars at maximum

  • @zzyzxzee6374
    @zzyzxzee6374 7 років тому +3

    Casio rangeman w tough solar,never needs battery,adjusts itself at midnight but you can also manually adjust it.has stand alone compass,barometer with graphing,thermometer,altitude,sunrise/sunset, waterproof to 1000 ft, gshock tough, weighs nothing on your wrist..stop watch, 4 alarms,timer,perpetual calandar,light. Around $189.00

    • @zzyzxzee6374
      @zzyzxzee6374 7 років тому +3

      It can be in total darkness for 9 months and still work.

  • @MrARV1
    @MrARV1 7 років тому +1

    Hello Nick, I totally agree, great video, Cheers!!!!

  • @mgkarpov85
    @mgkarpov85 4 роки тому

    Flawless explanation. Really enjoyed this video

  • @lordmonty9421
    @lordmonty9421 7 років тому +97

    I'm 34 now. In the seventh grade I made it known that I wanted a watch. I don't exactly know why, but...I remember that I did. I think they sold it at Sears? I remember it had a green face, golden Roman numerals for markers, and...well, long story short, it was a women's watch. I realized this after the fact. But hey, I was what, twelve? Not long after I got a Timex digital watch, and I think that was the only watch I owned right up till the age of 22, when it got melted in a house fire. Insurance money payed for a Wenger quartz model that I wore for a couple of years after and then, after having just been fired from a job (which I was about to quit anyway, but in this fashion gained me a bit of a severance) I bought myself an Omega Speedmaster Professional. I had just turned 25.
    In the days leading up to its delivery, I had a few "What have I DONE?!" moments. I sank a good portion of my savings into a luxury watch! Like, what?! Seriously, what...the...fuck kind of decision was that? My Dad was outraged when I told him. One step closer to me having to ask him for money, he probably thought. Anyway, in the close to ten years that I've owned that watch (ten years this December), I didn't regret it for one second. I never once serviced the thing, and it still runs great. Every time I went to look at just the time, I'd find myself lingering to admire the watch's beauty.
    Last Saturday? Last Saturday, July 29th, I bought myself a Rolex Milgauss. Blue face. It's on my wrist now. The Omega I will never part with, but the Rolex...well, it's not until you own one that you understand what they're about. These watches, they're "alive" in a way that quartz isn't. I've owned both, and Quartz, although eternally reliable (unless the battery melts and wrecks the thing's innards, as I've experienced), is a lot like a blow-up sex doll. Sure, it'll get the job done efficiently and for a good price, but...it's not quite the real woman you really want, is it? Sure, the real woman is going to cost you more and comes with her little quirks and eccentricities, but...at the end of the day, she makes you whole. Besides, has anyone ever called you out for being -4 to +6 seconds early or late on a day's spread? No, I didn't think so.
    (For the record, I've never owned or had any contact with a blow up sex doll. Heh heh. Just making an analogy. It's not the destination, folks, but the journey.)

    • @theurbanloner8879
      @theurbanloner8879 6 років тому +2

      James Ash lol I have a simmiler story . Needless to say I'm now 31 and am actively looking for that beauty auto time piece. I've held a couple and there are simply magnificent machines. I'm so fascinated by the craftsmanship and art. They each have their own personalities and I hope to own one that I can pass along to a loved one. Like pulp fiction lol !

    • @dontrwooshmeimtrolling4003
      @dontrwooshmeimtrolling4003 6 років тому +7

      sure why don't write a book down here

    • @DestroBB
      @DestroBB 6 років тому

      James Ash EXCELLENT story!!!!

    • @bobgrover999
      @bobgrover999 6 років тому +2

      That's well put James. Until you got to the bit where you never had it serviced! Mechanical watches are like cars - they will go on for a long time after they are due a service, but some bits will start to wear if not cleaned and lubricated. You sound like you will probably keep your Speedmaster for ever, so It may be worth weighing up whether to pre-empt problems rather than wait for them. If the thought of paying for a service makes your eyes water (like most people) watching a video of a skilled watch repairer servicing a watch might ease the blow. (The watch repair channel on youtube is very good).

    • @benleon
      @benleon 6 років тому +7

      "I'll wind up getting one." I noticed what you did there, even if you didn't ;-)

  • @r56mini
    @r56mini 7 років тому +21

    I just went in a circle. I started with Casio G-Shock watches. Bought Seiko automatic dive watches. Bought more expensive automatic/hand wind Swiss and German watches of which 4 were Rolex. I got tired of +2 spd and bought a Grand Seiko quartz watch for +/- 10 seconds per year. I don't have to worry about syncing at night like radio signal receptor watches. My watch is independently accurate.

    • @8AP1
      @8AP1 6 років тому

      I'm kinda the same. Got rid of my no date sub. I will never get rid of a few of my high end swiss pieces, but you gotta love the Seiko 9F62 super quartz movement. Hermetically sealed, 50 year service interval, fully rebuildable, adjustable and don't have to worry about babying it.
      Nothing wrong with Seiko automatics, go forever and cheap to service/replace.

    • @JerryWDaviscom
      @JerryWDaviscom 6 років тому

      Quartz is king. Read my comments at top of page.

  • @cbarnes767
    @cbarnes767 6 років тому +1

    I'm an avid watch collector, and I'm not in to quartz watches, but everything you mention for the most part is correct. I believe you have the true watch guys, who love the detail and craftsmanship behind it, and then you have those that like to have nice things just to have them. Nothing wrong with either in my opinion. Well done comparison sir. This video will help someone make an important purchase decision.

  • @chillwill120
    @chillwill120 8 років тому +1

    Nice video and great points.

  • @lund905360
    @lund905360 7 років тому +19

    Casio quartz best watches ever.

  • @AkshayBhurke
    @AkshayBhurke 7 років тому +7

    That watch, that black watch right there, is 5 dollars? 5 friggin' dollars? Are all those dials and buttons just mocks?

  • @stauffer65
    @stauffer65 8 років тому

    Nice Vid!! Quality info!!

  • @kallepkallep
    @kallepkallep 6 років тому

    Very good summary, spot on! I have an Hamilton navy scuba but I didn´t bought it for excellent timekeeping, for me it´s a jewel on my wrist.

  • @alwong604
    @alwong604 8 років тому +57

    Love your perspective even if I don't agree with it.

    • @TheEchelon
      @TheEchelon 7 років тому +14

      I think he pretty much stated facts, there's no agreeing or disagreeing. A Quartz watch holds many advantages. However, that doesn't mean you can prefer a mechanical movement.

    • @mrtigerboy444
      @mrtigerboy444 7 років тому

      The title makes a qualitative statement of opinion about which option is "...the best choice." That certainly DOES open the door to agreeing or disagreeing. The very thing that I love about watches has to do with a great appreciation for the fascinated wonder that is inspired by the exquisitely-made, beautiful, precise, amazing, tiny mechanical device. The finely-crafted details. The orchestration of moving gears. Quartz watches are just cheap electronics made from cheap plastic. Some of them cannot even be opened. They are glued shut. Made to be disposable. Trash! An excellent mechanical watch can be handed-down to one's grandchildren. A plastic quartz can be handed-down to the landfill. There are exquisite watches in museums that still function perfectly well. They are breathtakingly beautiful! Mechanical watchmaking is an art. Coming to the conclusion that "quartz watches are probably the best choice" is an absurd statement of the highest order (at least in my opinion).

    • @TheEchelon
      @TheEchelon 7 років тому +6

      Tucker Plum tl;dr. Sure, you can agree or disagree with whichever you prefer or like better. But he made valid points nonetheless.

    • @erikknudsen4034
      @erikknudsen4034 7 років тому +1

      I'm with you. I like to wear something that matters, which means I wear a mechanical to tell the time. It's something I'll be able to pass down after I'm gone, with all of it's wear and tear. For all other information, I have a phone... which will die or be replaced every 2-3 years. My son/grandsons/etc will be able to have it someday and know that I used it to tell time.

    • @Rimrock300
      @Rimrock300 7 років тому +14

      We drive cars with 100+ computers on board. We REFUSE to wind up our car windows mechanical by hand, to much work! But our WATCHES, oh mechanical, we don't wanna see a electronic watch, we want to CRUSH it if we see a electronic watch. my next cell phone will be mechanical

  • @williampeckham9838
    @williampeckham9838 7 років тому +3

    Mechanical all the way I say. Although I do love my citizen eco drive

  • @robbieschwaiger
    @robbieschwaiger 8 років тому

    Thanks for a very informative video. I learned a lot and for me quartz is the go. Accuracy is very important for me when it comes to time keeping.

  • @PaKePo
    @PaKePo 6 років тому

    Great video, thanks man
    Also, tha Sinn is just gorgeous, cheers man!

  • @chenghanli2541
    @chenghanli2541 7 років тому +8

    132 people wears mechanical watch.

  • @repo4
    @repo4 8 років тому +31

    Of course quartz is the better choice for anyone who wants to know what time it is but as was said in the video, to me a little machine on my wrist with spinning gears and springs is much more interesting than a battery powered watch with tiny electric motors and a ticking seconds hand. In the same way, to me an internal combustion engine with pistons, valves, timing belts and turbos spinning at 100K rpm is far more interesting than a electric motor with a boring rotor wrapped in magnets.

    • @justinnanu4338
      @justinnanu4338 7 років тому

      crickets

    • @andyrichardson6188
      @andyrichardson6188 6 років тому +1

      I don't think anybody would disagree with this. Nick says as much in this video. The precision of even an inexpensive mechanical is amazing. The better ones are spectacular. My right brain wants mechanical. My left (analytical) brain wants quartz.

    • @noahmarshall3163
      @noahmarshall3163 5 років тому

      Andy Richardson spring drive

  • @johnwood9378
    @johnwood9378 5 років тому

    Great comparison and sensible conclusion. I have 3 quartz watches which keep almost perfect time however I inevitably wear my Seiko Diver auto which now loses about 30 seconds a day - I will get it demagnetised!

  • @mickdeboer9047
    @mickdeboer9047 6 років тому

    Great deduction and very true, thank you!

  • @oguzabay
    @oguzabay 6 років тому +27

    quartz is watch. mechanical is timemachine.

    • @mkien2005
      @mkien2005 5 років тому

      well said.

    • @YY-wu7et
      @YY-wu7et 4 роки тому

      mechanical is an expensive man-bracelet

  • @XJoshuamiller
    @XJoshuamiller 6 років тому +23

    Quartz watches are pretty good when it comes to price, time, ect...
    But you cant beat a good old vintage mechanical watch :D

  • @dylvasey
    @dylvasey 6 років тому

    Good video raising some good points. I've never seen an Oceanus before, but my god it's a pretty watch.

  • @Zoltani
    @Zoltani 7 років тому

    Excellent easy to understand. Love the straight-forward education. Good East Coast no BS information. Great job, I learned a lot from watching this video. Keep it up ... Nice!

  • @ccw1961
    @ccw1961 8 років тому +5

    Try a Grand Seiko....Job Done!

  • @adamgreene831
    @adamgreene831 7 років тому +3

    After doing a decent amount of research, I decided to purchase the Victorinox INOX. I would say its the best you can get for under $300 but that's just my humble opinion.

  • @Susazeu
    @Susazeu 7 років тому

    Great vid! My father collected watches for most of his life, and like me, hated automatics. Maybe it was because quartz movements were developed in the mid 70s. I see automatics as a turntable: a nice piece of nostalgia. I love my quartz but specially the Eco Drive and the solar. Pity there's no frequencies in Argentina for the radio controlled. The only watch that has survived so far for 30 years was my mother's rolex. Where I live that's a really expensive watch, and you become a moving target. I think a lot when adding a new watch to my collection: How much would I use it (average 5 years), how much I paid, style (I lusted for a Corum Admiral's cup for 20 years and it was worth every single penny), and a specific use. I hope many people understand that having a quartz watch is not shameful.

  • @ianmedium
    @ianmedium 5 років тому +1

    All the points you make for quartz are why when I was a kid in the late sixties, early seventies were why most who wore watches ran to them with open arms and gratitude. Because they became so cheap but still retained incredible timekeeping they were taken for granted. If your my age though the revolution of quartz is still alive and well in us!

  • @mikew2911
    @mikew2911 7 років тому +6

    I like to celebrate the history of the watch, one of the greatest feats of engineering in human history, not shove a Chinese battery in it and watch it tick away. You will form a personal bond with a mechanical watch, you will remember the places you go and the experiences you had with it on your wrist, a tiny machine keeping time.

    • @NickShabazz
      @NickShabazz  7 років тому +6

      I've got some pretty serious personal bond with quartz too. But you raise a great point: A big part of this decision is based in emotional reasoning. And for many people, mechanical is much more emotionally satisfying.

  • @altexlan415
    @altexlan415 7 років тому +3

    why probably? quartz watch are accurate .I prefer solar quartz watch, no need to change battery.

    • @Anonymous-if9mp
      @Anonymous-if9mp 5 років тому

      how long can ur watch works after a full capacity of sunlight ?

  • @itsallrobbish
    @itsallrobbish 7 років тому +2

    The Casio MRW200 (White face) that you showed, I have the black one, which I use as my beater watch at work, it's not a g shock, but it will take a real kicking! I put it in my 1600rpm washing machine on a full cycle and it gained a minute, that's all that happened, a great watch, the only minus point was that the battery stopped in 18 months, with no indication that it was gonna happen. The good thing is that I bought a packet of 20 watch batteries for £1 in the local supermarket!

  • @Studio93013
    @Studio93013 7 років тому

    EXCELLENT video! I just subscribed.