where is Beautiful Blazor Websites ??? everyone just talking about infrastructure no template because there is a lot of non-compatibility in .net 8 and .net 9 and frameworks and mudblazor and nuget packages and ...
Great job on creating educational videos and sharing your expertise with us! It's fantastic to see that you're offering free knowledge and skills to help others learn and grow. As a viewer, I'm eagerly awaiting your next episodes and series. Your content is valuable, and I hope you'll continue to provide us. If possible, it would be great to see you post a new video at least once a week, keep up the excellent work, and thank you.
@@cas818028 According to Daniel Roth (MS Blazor Product Mgr) There are about 7 direct and another dozen indirect developers working on Blazor, with 2000 additional devs using blazor internally for apps.
I'm more than halfway in and no beautiful webistes with blazor as promised int he title. STOP WASTING EVERYBODY'S TIME (and stop paying for fake comments too, it's obvious). Useless video.
I'm scared of using blazor in fear that microsoft wants to deprecate it like all the other frameworks... silverlight, wpf, winforms to replace them with "better" solutions. Not gonna get burnt again.
I think the possibility of being burned is a bit less, because it is not something on top or instead (silverlight, for example) and it is using the web (don't need the client to have capabilities for wpf or winforms)
I have been building web stuff for clients with Microsoft tech for 20 some years. The most amazing thing is all the old Microsoft code I wrote is still working. One client of mine is still running his business system on DOS. An old boss of mine had wrote it in DOS for him which was new at the time in the 80s. Now he is my client and I help him keep it running on a VM so the desktops can run Windows and run it in Remote Desktop as an app. I joke with this client that he has save a lot of money because I would have rewrote it 5 times by now, if old Microsoft tech stops working. My point is that Microsoft if very careful not to break anything, which is very cool. But yes we still need new tech like Blazor. Another thing Microsoft does is to make is so that one dev can be very productive and not need a team of developers. Very nice if you want to run your own business as a developer.
Yes, Silverlight required a plug-in for it to work in web browsers (just like Adobe Flash) and is dead. However, you can still create desktop applications (WinForms, WPF, and MAUI) in .NET 9 as of today.
where is Beautiful Blazor Websites ??? everyone just talking about infrastructure no template because there is a lot of non-compatibility in .net 8 and .net 9 and frameworks and mudblazor and nuget packages and ...
Great job on creating educational videos and sharing your expertise with us! It's fantastic to see that you're offering free knowledge and skills to help others learn and grow.
As a viewer, I'm eagerly awaiting your next episodes and series. Your content is valuable, and I hope you'll continue to provide us. If possible, it would be great to see you post a new video at least once a week, keep up the excellent work, and thank you.
I want to use Blazor, but Microsoft has too much churn in frontend frameworks. That makes convincing companies to use Blazor difficult.
Even MS doesn’t use Blazor. They use React for all their production customer facing web apps
@@cas818028 Yes they do.
@@cas818028 They just started using it for production technologies such as Microsoft Aspire now.
@@cas818028 that's hilarious 😂
@@cas818028 According to Daniel Roth (MS Blazor Product Mgr) There are about 7 direct and another dozen indirect developers working on Blazor, with 2000 additional devs using blazor internally for apps.
Very good video. Thank you!
writing electoronics in papers always works but in reality story is different sir
what do you mean by that sir?
very nice project!
muchisimas gracias, el extremos completo. y gracias por compartir.
brilliant 👍👍
I'm more than halfway in and no beautiful webistes with blazor as promised int he title. STOP WASTING EVERYBODY'S TIME (and stop paying for fake comments too, it's obvious).
Useless video.
Great video, thank you.
And....the beautiful website?
I'm scared of using blazor in fear that microsoft wants to deprecate it like all the other frameworks... silverlight, wpf, winforms to replace them with "better" solutions.
Not gonna get burnt again.
I think the possibility of being burned is a bit less, because it is not something on top or instead (silverlight, for example) and it is using the web (don't need the client to have capabilities for wpf or winforms)
TBF Winforms was in .net 1.0 released in 2002. I'd say that was a pretty good run(!)
I have been building web stuff for clients with Microsoft tech for 20 some years. The most amazing thing is all the old Microsoft code I wrote is still working. One client of mine is still running his business system on DOS. An old boss of mine had wrote it in DOS for him which was new at the time in the 80s. Now he is my client and I help him keep it running on a VM so the desktops can run Windows and run it in Remote Desktop as an app. I joke with this client that he has save a lot of money because I would have rewrote it 5 times by now, if old Microsoft tech stops working. My point is that Microsoft if very careful not to break anything, which is very cool. But yes we still need new tech like Blazor. Another thing Microsoft does is to make is so that one dev can be very productive and not need a team of developers. Very nice if you want to run your own business as a developer.
Yes, Silverlight required a plug-in for it to work in web browsers (just like Adobe Flash) and is dead.
However, you can still create desktop applications (WinForms, WPF, and MAUI) in .NET 9 as of today.
Google is worst on than.
❤ thanks
SSR = server side rendering, not static server side rendering (Static SSR)
SSR = static server side rendering
@@niku-fx666 Incorrect From MSDN docs:
Static Server Static server-side rendering (static SSR)
Go online and read the docs Blazor rendering modes.
@@niku-fx666 No it is not. It is static server side rendering. Read the documentation on their website.
@@niku-fx666 No it is not. My original post is correct. Read the documentation on their website.
@@niku-fx666 No it is not. Read the documentation.