This could be hype generated for more funding, but 13 meters definitely ain't the largest T. rex...I would say 17 meters and 13 tons...what is your estimate for the largest ever?
@@ahmadfaizan5173So i’d say Scotty is the biggest complete skeleton for a T-Rex, but very unlikely the biggest T-Rex speciemen ever existed. There are many Tyrannosaurus individuals that aren’t fossilized, which they could have been much larger than Scotty, or fossilized ones that are still larger
I actually might have a fossil from one of these mega size rexes. I recently acquired a very large T-rex premax tooth. Now the premax is the equivalent of our incisors and are usually much smaller than the large teeth on the side. Most premaxes will have a slant length of less than two inches, usually about 1.5 - 1.6 inches. This one is almost 3.
I'm a T-Rex fanboy, but even I agree to not make assumptions on animals/specimens that does not exist/undiscovered. The problem with this study is that it's just gonna hype up all those Spino, Carcha and Giga fanboys to claim the non-existent super-sized version of their favorite theropod despite the lack of evidence. It's the "bigger than T-Rex" hype perpetuated by Jurassic park and Ark Survival all over again.
But it doesn't make sense to say that Rex is the only one that has grown like that, every apex predator in each zone could have grown, that making them at least longer than T Rex... For not to mention that there are a lot of Tyrannosaurus studies when, for example, Giga is a very poor known dino, such as Carcha and Spino as you say so... We don't clearly know how large this creatures could grow until they find more specimens
This type of gigantism wouldn't be allowed in nature, but the largest African bush elephant was 13 feet tall at the withers and weighed 24000 lbs. The average African bush elephant is 9-11 feet tall and 10000-14000 lbs. There is still hope for a 26000lbs T. rex over 43 feet long
@@isaacslein6432 As far as 43 feet goes Sue and Scotty is already almost there .and they are only around 9 to 10 tons. With the pray it had on hand their would be no reason for it to get that large but I'm not saying it can't. The Kodak Bear is way bigger then it needs to be but yet it's over size for what it has on hand.
@@neganrex5693 exactly, both of them have been estimate from 41 to 43 feet(for Scotty even though most reconstructions make it closer to 41 or 42 feet in length)
@@isaacslein6432 I agree. I think 46 feet max and one getting that big could repo for a living and that would be a rear one like in the Grizzly Bear world. From time to time oversize male Grizzly Bears will make a living following Wolf packs but no way means they are 900 pound Buzzards and will make their own kill from time to time. The T-Rex for some reason reminds me of the Grizzly Bear of the Dino world.
I would rather run into one that big then your common size T-Rex for the simple fact humans would not be worth it's time. Who wants to run all day trying to catch a tic-tac or bite size candy bar when you would use more energy then it would give. It's going to the zoo and see what's caged up going no where that's gut filling.
@@yvettezilla Being that big you would no longer need to hunt and just wait tell some faster predator to catch something and invite yourself to dinner and if the other predator stands up to you eat it to. On the other hand a Grizzly Bear is ten time bigger then a Wolf but it can out run the Wolf in a take off any given day so size is not going to hold it down.
If a T-Rex could grow to that size and weighed that much, then it must have lived longer than 30 years, my theory is that the T-Rex had the same growth rate as sharks and crocs and lifespan of crocs 70-100 years maybe more depending on how much they eat, I mean take the biggest crocodiles that have lived with throughout the years for example, look at how big they are and how long they lived because of how much they've eaten.
@@anthonylopez8682 but still 70 feet or more for a land only carnivore like T-Rex is too much for the animal unless this one has Gigantism like some animals and humans get.
The African Bush bull elephant mounted in the Smithsonian is 13 ft at the shoulder, two feet higher than the typical full grown male of that species, with commensurate increase in weight as well. So, a Rex markedly bigger than the currently largest known Rex is conceivable.
it is not... First of all those specimens are extremely rare, and sometimes they are oversized due to diseases or genetic anormalities. Plus, most of those don't survive in the wild, specially carnivores who hunt, you don't see in the wild lions doubling their natural size for instance. I don't believe that a 70% bigger T-Rex, would last in the wild, not just because of the bigger quantity of food requirements and because the normal sized T-Rex already had problems with its motion, they were probably walkers and not runners and their big size already imposed a big challenge to their 2 legs. If T-Rex were alive today, actually the majority of them would be smaller than Sue or Scotty, since they only reached that big size at 20 years old, wich is more than 2/3 of their lives, and some of them would not even reach that age.
@@mrboombastic8369 With Sue and Scotty they my have just been in their kind of young or in their middle ages at time of death but they fought day in and day out for a living that will shorten any things life. That same animal in a zoo could hit 60 years of age. We in the 1800's would make it to 40's and 50's but now since life is easier 70' and 90's are common. An old T-Rex would be rear. A M-Rex found in South America that was in it's 50's could shed some light on how long a giant predator Dino could age. Oversize male Grizzly Bears could shed some light on how oversize T-Rex's could make a living. They adopt a Wolf pack and wait for them to make a kill and come in and eat but they still won't pass up a chance to make an easy kill of their own. An oversize T-Rex could take down a Triceratops easy if he gets one alone and no place to go. Plus an oversize 900 pound Bear can move fast it's self so I see no reason why T-Rex can't.
@@neganrex5693 well you surely are talking about lot of things wrong amd that you don't know. First of all you don't know T-Rex growth cicle, it growth a lot since birth till reaching its maximum size at adulthood, in case of Rex was a little after 20 years old, then they stopped growing, like it happens with the majority with animals, after puberty and reaching adulthood they just stop growing, there are few exceptions in the wild(crocs may continue growing but very slowly), but the majority of animals works that way. Then what you are talking about the animals zoo life span is non-sense, actually the life span of animals in the wild is similar to the ones in the zoo. Saying that humans in the 1800's didn't lived more than 40 or 50 is ridiculous, just go check the age of dead of people known, people lived till their 70's, some 80's. Plus it was not discovered any T-Rex with 50 years old. You have to get your facts straight really...
@@tri-ify8852 Sue was 29 years of age and Scotty was 30 at time of death so that maybe a standard but everything living today has oversized ones. Trexs was also as large as them but younger and still had growing to do so that one would have ended up larger then them two. Most was around 16 years of age at death. If we had one in a zoo and not fighting living armored tanks day in and day out and each other would let us know how big they could really get. I'm thinking 45 feet at 14 or more tons.
@Varanus They found a toe bone they believe my have belonged to a T-Rex that would beat out Scotty and Sue easily and has not been proved yet that it does not belong to T-Rex so it's not been debunked that would put it around 14 US tons. It could belong to a hydrasaur that would also make it a bet oversized for what their was around at the time. Since they have only found a hand full of T-Rex's and the chance of them finding the biggest that ever lived is next to zero so there is bigger out there. Almost every species on earth has oversize when it comes to big animals that get a little off the size chart. I could see T-Rex getting 14 US tons and would be most likely a scavenger and meal time bully since it could take whatever it wants but also take down pray it's self. You see this in Grizzly Bears being oversized and stocking packs of Wolves cashing in on a free meal.
@Varanus It wouldn’t be slight. The average size of a saltwater crocodile is 17 feet but they can grow to 24 feet. That’s almost 50% bigger. Do you not think a rex could once in a while reach 45-50 feet long?
I agree this is something you take with a grain of salt. As they said a Rex of that size appears to be mechanically possible, that is a fairly straightforward biomechanical question. Does the math and material science work? The question is not the mechanical feasibility, it's whether they DID reach that size. So far there is no evidence they did, merely the supposition that based on what remains we do have what would a top of the bell curve specimen look like, or one with gigantism. And that is pure speculation.
I know that non-avian dinosaurs are known for their massive size, the big ones anyway, but I'm taking this with a pinch of salt too. You have to take into account that T.rex was a terrestrial predator and while we know T.rex was a giant, if it got too big then hunting would be a problem. If it was too big it wouldn't be able to move as fast or agile, not to mention sneaking around is next to impossible for a sauropod sized therapod.
Of course Present example is Lion Lion having more food than tigers But they are all smaller than Tigers Because Lions can't amush easily in the open desert, so need Speed during hunting. While Tiger could amush their prey easily in forest, so they don't speed that mush Where Bears mostly eating fish but they are bigger because they don't need any speed to catch a fish.
T rex was actually incredibly agile and quiet when hunting.. you wouldnt even hear it approaching, thats how good they were.. adding a few extra kgs wouldnt stop that.. As for size and being a predator, bears are massive and share the same hunting grounds and smaller tigers and wolves and other smaller predators.. bear is still the king of their domain. They have no issues with food and neither would a trex
@@onmyway330yes and no. a lion isnt smaller because it needs speed, it doesnt need speed, it needs strength and numbers. Leopards are smaller and still arent as fast nor as strong but only take down small mammals. the cheetah is smaller as well but has speed but again, can only take down smaller prey.. These animals and their size has nothing to do with anything youve said, at all. A tiger is bigger because thats how it was created, not because it doesnt need to be fast. They are incredibly quick animals and probably quicker and faster than a lion.
Yeah they're going to be saying that again in about 20 years" it was actually bigger than what we thought in 2024" the average T-Rex height is about 15 ft. The Titanosaur is 122 feet tall and weight 65 tons a T-Rex was not messing with that
It's always possible, but that would make the rex from Ark an accurate size. And we all know THAT beast is big enough to pick up a bull African elephant
If there's an issue with video editing, such as obscured captions, it could be an oversight during the editing process. It's always good to double-check for clarity and ensure the audience has the best viewing experience.
I really wish they tried this method for some of the prehistoric wildlife that's been getting the short straw in recent years in terms of size (Mosasaurus, Liopleurodon, Megalodon etc)
We're still discovering living creatures out there that we'd never imagined. . I image all these bones they dig up barely scratches the surface of what was once out there. And to be honest I've suspected T-Rex WASN'T the baddest boy around in it's day. Anyway, now I know what I want to see in the next Jurassic World movie. Time for Rexy to grow up...
@@Waaris_771 I figured they might make a 'new discovery'. Maybe Rexy is a species that eventually grows to a much larger size in it's 'old age'. I figured the 'giant size T-Rex' was just too cool an idea to pass up in a dinosaur movie franchise.. And to be honest, now I really want to see it.
Who knows..its a miracle we have the fossils we do..who knows what animals may never be found..I could believe trex was even bigger then thought..don't we find animals overgrown once in a while? Trex was around what millions of years? That means many many possibilities..what a sight it would have been to see it in its prime..
Fossilization requires a rare set of circumstances and it's indeed remarkable that we have as many specimens as we do. T. rex's size estimates are based on the available fossil record, but with only a fraction of past life fossilized, larger individuals could have existed.
I mean, as one that follows news about Trex and wants to study them thoroughly in the Geoscience/Paleontological field, it could be possible that Trex could’ve been much bigger than what we once thought of such as Sue or Scotty for that matter. I mean, not to mention with more recent discoveries such as the Titanosaurids like Alamosaurus that could’ve lived at both the same time and place as our beloved Tyrant Lizard King, even with pack standards that’s a lot of sauropod to take down even at Alamosaurus being at a juvenile stage in life. Thus the theory that Trex (which I believe did hunt in packs due to theories off of fossil evidence) could’ve been bigger than we once thought? Not impossible 🤷♂️🦖 it was indeed the super predator of its time and ecosystem so anything is of course possible.
That would be insane… arthritis would be going crazy because of how heavy they are, but T. rex was one of the most efficient skull shape for a giant theropod predator and it could be true
It’s definitely feelisible that there were rexes far larger than scotty and sue, I don’t doubt there might have been old rexes that reached maybe 10 or 11 tons (keeping in mind that it wouldn’t be as drastic a physical SIZE change as displayed in your diagrams in the video, the hypothetical old rexes were likely extremely bulky much like abnormally large bears) I seriously doubt any Rex got to 20+ meters / 15+ tons in weight, an animal that size would HAVE to be quadrupedal, so, definitely not Rex
My imagination is getting the best of me on this one. Alas... however, i digress Hard to imagine two legs able to handle 50-60k. Even 20-30k on two legs seems ridiculous. Trex with his 30k lbs of hate walkin around all negative on two legs. Tiny arms. Everyone else has four legs and smaller. All lonely. Nobody likes him cause he eats everyone to death. 😆. Got to be tough to be a T-Rex
Thats a myth. With the increase in weight, there will be an increase in bulk, and hence the centre of gravity would be shifted by the body, where the creature can be perfectly balanced. Edmontosaurus and Shantungosaurus (15 tons, 20 tons) are perfectly capable of walking bipedal. T rex can do it aswell.
Some may argue that a bigger TRex would be too big to move fast enough to catch prey, however keep in mind that while it may have been slow, it was probably still faster than it's prey at the time, and if a TRex that's way larger as this video suggests, it may have been big enough to kill large Sauropods, not necessarily fully grown!
I'm sure there were some outliers that got considerably larger but I don't think comparing humans to most animals is good for a comparison. We're the only species that has agriculture, medicines etc that have greatly affected our size. We're not special biologically but we have definitely had far more control over our environment than any other animal on earth. I think a better comparison would be animals of similar ilk. Maybe looking at the largest recorded ostrich or an emu and comparing to their average?
Can’t we say this about any theropod? I mean char char and spino like the T rex have only a few ‘complete’ skeletons so could char char have been 23 meters? Or spino 25? I doubt it but I think there could of been specimens of the T rex reaching 15 meters, char char reaching 17 and spino reaching 20 meters. But I think these would be a rare site much like freak salmon that weigh 50 lbs
I think previous estimates of spinosaurus and charcharodontosaurus were 18m and 14m with max weights reaching 15+ and 10+ tones but were later changed.
I've always thought that one of these days they're going to find a Therapod predator with a skull about 9 or 10 feet long. I am confident that the only reason they haven't found it yet is because they simply cannot believe what they're seeing, it's just too incredible for their eyes and mind to process. It's like missing a 1000 carat diamond because you've always been looking for 20 carat diamonds.
Considering the massive diversity we see in sizes of different dog breeds that all have nearly identical (species wise) DNA, as well as the massive diversity in the sizes and shapes we see in our own species, it stands to reason that many dinosaur species had diverse sizes and shapes while retaining the same DNA as well. I've often believed that many of the currently recognised species of dinosaurs are actually just different "breeds" of a smaller amount of species... but I'm not a scientist...
Dogs are so diverse in appearances because they have been selectively bred by humans, a chihuahua or pug in the wild would be far less adept than a German shepherd at surviving, and less likely to pass on its genes so eventually a more generalized, efficient shape would become the most common appearance for domesticated dogs. Same with wild animals, extreme mutations like that would be very rare, put extra burdens on survival, or eventually just get bred out of the species.
@@tau-5794 Sure, dogs were selectively bred by humans... but humans themselves have a very diverse range of sizes and shapes which occurred naturally. I'm not saying that every theropod must be the same species, and every sauropod must be the same species... I'm just saying that maybe there was a little more genetic diversity within some species than we can see just by examining their fossils.
@@livewire2759 I totally agree though the dog example dont work cause we've tampered with them to make them smaller and weaker, but i totally would think size ranges of animals would be much more diverse with millions of years without people fkn with them
@@theliftedpro I should have clarified why I used dogs for an example, but I didn't want to type out a whole book... The point, really, is that if you test the DNA of any dog and compare it to any other dog, it will be nearly identical, indicating that there is a lot of... leeway... so to speak... in DNA. Therefore, individuals of a dinosaur species that existed for millions of years easily could have been widely diverse in size and shape while still technically being the same species, even without selective breeding by an outside actor. No, it's not the best example, but it was the most diverse example I could think of.
This rule doesn't only apply to T.rex but can apply to other megatheropods like giganatosaurus and carcharadontosaurus. Just putting it out there. Could it be that Saurophaganax is just a extremly large Allosaurus like for us seeing a 7 foot person. Who knows.
Indeed, the principle of gigantism is not exclusive to T. rex and applies to other megatheropods like Giganotosaurus and Carcharodontosaurus. These dinosaurs evolved to large sizes due to factors like prey availability, environmental conditions, and evolutionary pressures.
Not just fossils we've never uncovered but animals that never were fossilized or whose fossils have been destroyed. A very small percentile of animals have their skeletal remains preserved like that. One of the more depressing things to come to terms with is there are many things we will simply never know about.
the issue is is that this is so speculative and in fairness due to how many trex skeletons we have found and the fact that this logic could be used for char char or giga or literaly any other theropod i think just wait until there is a verdict from most leading paleontologist's on this subject.
There are always outliers to any dataset. Speculating an outlier max size for any species is great and all, but it doesn’t mean much without the baseline data of averages.
I really don’t think this is possible for a Tyrannosaurus at all. Scotty was the largest at 43 feet (13.2 meters) long and 19,555 lbs, and that in itself is absolutely enormous. A bipedal creature to weigh in at anything over 10 tons is just insane. Gravity wouldn’t allow it, it’s legs would be crushed under its own weight.
@@dadoprado208 Making the Tyrannosaurus larger overall makes it a more destructive unit, whereas just making the Spinosaurus larger doesn't change what it was (assumed to be) built for or capable of.
It's not impossible. Just unproven. The odds of us having the skeleton of the biggest Rex to ever live is astronomically small. We don't know how big they got, but it's reasonable to assume that they got significantly bigger than anything we know about.
If they existed today or I existed back then, I wouldn’t last AT ALL because I want to touch their little hand so bad 😅. Why do their hands have to be so cute 😂😂😂
When it comes to dinos almost everything is a theory and will always will be...ive always loved dinosaurs and always knew of them but it wouldn't be far fetched that a lot of dino skeletons might not be real, its probably stupid to some people but how many people were there to see a dinosaur skeletons being dug out. And who knows what technology out there could now especially make fake bones.
I don’t think the T-Rex could get that big because being bipedal is a hard restrict of how big an animal can get so if the T-Rex would ever get to that size, it’s going to need a more robust side of limbs.
That is up for debate we are still finding stuff especially in the ocean and still finding new dinos so it's a relatively good chance at least one creature that was a predator that also was bigger then a rex
Fossil findings suggest an average weight of about 6 tonnes for the T rex. Usually the biggest individuals of a species is around twice as big as the average size. So we could assume that the very largest T rex would weight up to 12 tonnes, similar in size to the biggest african bush elephant on record.
Dang T-rex got alot of buffs that makes it a powerful dinosaur while Spinosaurus got alot of nerf and weakness and my fav long neck dinosaur amphicoelias got small Anyways I like the video
I believe theres a few 15-17m rexes out there that havent been found yet. I kno they base evereything on “Sue” bc shes the most complete i just dont believe 40ft was the max size for a trex
It is a possibility that t-rex could possibly reach to a size of 13m. And a weight of 15 tones. Would be amazing to find fossils of a tyrannosaurus of that size
Could be wrong but I think that only around 40 individual specimens have been discovered, so trying to guess the size of the largest ones is a guess at best, but considering that there were probably many many millions of them over the years it’s certainly plausible that some were much larger than the ones we have found
Bite marks from something even bigger than Carcharodontosaurus were found on Ultrasaur and Argentinosaur bones. Not even its skull has been found yet. Sometimes... it's the predator we DON'T get to see, that's the scariest...
keep in mind if t rexes are 12 to 13 feet in height, then some of them might've been even bigger. This is probably the average size, some of them could be 15 or 17 feet. maybe even a few were 20 feet tall.
Being bitten by a large theropod dinosaur would have been a serious affair. Their teeth were adapted for different feeding strategies, from bone-crushing to flesh-slicing, which would have had different impacts on the prey.
Before the proposal was rejected, T. imperator was believed to be the original species of tyrannosaurus that was ancestral to the other 2 species: T. rex and T. regina. Tyrannosaurus imperator and rex were almost identical with the only differences between them were the number of teeth and size with T. rex being the slightly bigger of the two. T. regina was said to be less stockier and a little smaller than the other two. But now it's accepted that these physical differences between tyrannosaurs are the result of variation between individuals rather than several different species.
My Inner Child is going YEAAAAHHHHH, but the 33 Year Old Me will be Eagerly waiting for some New Discovery. But also makes you wonder how many OTHER Dinos Sizes did we get wrong...
If someone found a T Rex skeleton that big they' have the opportunity to become a millionaire, in fact I think a bidding war could push that to over a billion. Please make it be me 😂
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #30 ДВА В ОДНОМ [Один человек]• Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nrXy15orKhY/mqdefault.jpg)
This could be hype generated for more funding, but 13 meters definitely ain't the largest T. rex...I would say 17 meters and 13 tons...what is your estimate for the largest ever?
34,000 pounds/17 Tons. Though if dinosaurs are like crocodilians, then they may just continue growing throughout their entire lives.
@@ahmadfaizan5173So i’d say Scotty is the biggest complete skeleton for a T-Rex, but very unlikely the biggest T-Rex speciemen ever existed. There are many Tyrannosaurus individuals that aren’t fossilized, which they could have been much larger than Scotty, or fossilized ones that are still larger
With the size of game they had I wouldn't think they would need to be 70% bigger. I would say 15 meters at most.
I actually might have a fossil from one of these mega size rexes. I recently acquired a very large T-rex premax tooth. Now the premax is the equivalent of our incisors and are usually much smaller than the large teeth on the side. Most premaxes will have a slant length of less than two inches, usually about 1.5 - 1.6 inches. This one is almost 3.
thats impossible, just 15 meters long Tyrannosaurus woudnt be able to feed itself for day
I'm a T-Rex fanboy, but even I agree to not make assumptions on animals/specimens that does not exist/undiscovered. The problem with this study is that it's just gonna hype up all those Spino, Carcha and Giga fanboys to claim the non-existent super-sized version of their favorite theropod despite the lack of evidence. It's the "bigger than T-Rex" hype perpetuated by Jurassic park and Ark Survival all over again.
Im a loyal spino fan but I know that Rex is bigger and stronger I don’t and work try to change that
T REX THE MOST BIGGEST CARNIVOROUS EARTH
@@christianvaixco196 megalodon??
@@shinanimatio IN WATER.
But it doesn't make sense to say that Rex is the only one that has grown like that, every apex predator in each zone could have grown, that making them at least longer than T Rex...
For not to mention that there are a lot of Tyrannosaurus studies when, for example, Giga is a very poor known dino, such as Carcha and Spino as you say so... We don't clearly know how large this creatures could grow until they find more specimens
Imagine if we find one with gigantism like a Robert waldow of tyrannosaurs rex.
This type of gigantism wouldn't be allowed in nature, but the largest African bush elephant was 13 feet tall at the withers and weighed 24000 lbs. The average African bush elephant is 9-11 feet tall and 10000-14000 lbs. There is still hope for a 26000lbs T. rex over 43 feet long
@@isaacslein6432 As far as 43 feet goes Sue and Scotty is already almost there .and they are only around 9 to 10 tons. With the pray it had on hand their would be no reason for it to get that large but I'm not saying it can't. The Kodak Bear is way bigger then it needs to be but yet it's over size for what it has on hand.
@@neganrex5693 exactly, both of them have been estimate from 41 to 43 feet(for Scotty even though most reconstructions make it closer to 41 or 42 feet in length)
@@isaacslein6432 I agree. I think 46 feet max and one getting that big could repo for a living and that would be a rear one like in the Grizzly Bear world. From time to time oversize male Grizzly Bears will make a living following Wolf packs but no way means they are 900 pound Buzzards and will make their own kill from time to time. The T-Rex for some reason reminds me of the Grizzly Bear of the Dino world.
@@neganrex5693 to be that big would be necessary because the menu had pretty dangerous and equally large items
A T Rex that gigantic would be terrifying
Yet somehow more escapable.
@cod
They're big, but a 15 ton Rex is much bigger
It would probably be incredibly slow though, atleast you'd have a chance to run lol
I would rather run into one that big then your common size T-Rex for the simple fact humans would not be worth it's time. Who wants to run all day trying to catch a tic-tac or bite size candy bar when you would use more energy then it would give. It's going to the zoo and see what's caged up going no where that's gut filling.
@@yvettezilla Being that big you would no longer need to hunt and just wait tell some faster predator to catch something and invite yourself to dinner and if the other predator stands up to you eat it to. On the other hand a Grizzly Bear is ten time bigger then a Wolf but it can out run the Wolf in a take off any given day so size is not going to hold it down.
Indy: Comes face to face with a Mega T Rex.
Also Indy: I... I think I came to the wrong park...
I Rex : On second thought, I'm gonna run like a coward now.
Mega T.rex: I made the door larger for you so it won’t hit you on your way out. 👹
Key word: indy never existed
@Elijah Lionel actually it would be 10.2 meters tall
Indy? Like Indiana Jones? I'm lost.. maybe😅
Thought this needs to be Absolutely proven, A much, Much larger version of the T-Rex sounds Damn fraking Incredible to me
That's not Tyrannosaurus Rex. That's Tyrannosaurus Dominum. A 75 foot long, 20 ton monster straight off the Ark. 😂
lol
More like 150 tons
The Ark? Something that never existed.
@@JTSuterhe is talking about ark survival evolved the game
@@JTSuter Do research on Biblical archeology and Surge evidence the big bang proves a theistic God exists
If a T-Rex could grow to that size and weighed that much, then it must have lived longer than 30 years, my theory is that the T-Rex had the same growth rate as sharks and crocs and lifespan of crocs 70-100 years maybe more depending on how much they eat, I mean take the biggest crocodiles that have lived with throughout the years for example, look at how big they are and how long they lived because of how much they've eaten.
Those are aquatic animals. T-Rex lifestyle must be similar to land predators like Lions, Tigers and Komodo dragons.
@@luisvelez1952 crocodiles are "semiaquatic" they're still reptiles plus, tortoises and elephants can live longer too.
@@anthonylopez8682 but still 70 feet or more for a land only carnivore like T-Rex is too much for the animal unless this one has Gigantism like some animals and humans get.
Now give them more oxygen to facilitate this size and growth, and a stronger magnetic field.
@@wildbeast7375 There was more Oxygen in the Mesozoic than there is today.
The African Bush bull elephant mounted in the Smithsonian is 13 ft at the shoulder, two feet higher than the typical full grown male of that species, with commensurate increase in weight as well. So, a Rex markedly bigger than the currently largest known Rex is conceivable.
And that's not even the tallest elephant ever. The tallest was one shot in Namibia in 1978 I think and it had a heigh of 4.20m or 13.78ft
We all know Sue and Scotty are the biggest found but common sense knows they are not the biggest that ever lived but what is suggested is crazy size.
it is not... First of all those specimens are extremely rare, and sometimes they are oversized due to diseases or genetic anormalities.
Plus, most of those don't survive in the wild, specially carnivores who hunt, you don't see in the wild lions doubling their natural size for instance. I don't believe that a 70% bigger T-Rex, would last in the wild, not just because of the bigger quantity of food requirements and because the normal sized T-Rex already had problems with its motion, they were probably walkers and not runners and their big size already imposed a big challenge to their 2 legs.
If T-Rex were alive today, actually the majority of them would be smaller than Sue or Scotty, since they only reached that big size at 20 years old, wich is more than 2/3 of their lives, and some of them would not even reach that age.
@@mrboombastic8369 With Sue and Scotty they my have just been in their kind of young or in their middle ages at time of death but they fought day in and day out for a living that will shorten any things life. That same animal in a zoo could hit 60 years of age. We in the 1800's would make it to 40's and 50's but now since life is easier 70' and 90's are common. An old T-Rex would be rear. A M-Rex found in South America that was in it's 50's could shed some light on how long a giant predator Dino could age.
Oversize male Grizzly Bears could shed some light on how oversize T-Rex's could make a living. They adopt a Wolf pack and wait for them to make a kill and come in and eat but they still won't pass up a chance to make an easy kill of their own. An oversize T-Rex could take down a Triceratops easy if he gets one alone and no place to go. Plus an oversize 900 pound Bear can move fast it's self so I see no reason why T-Rex can't.
@@neganrex5693 well you surely are talking about lot of things wrong amd that you don't know. First of all you don't know T-Rex growth cicle, it growth a lot since birth till reaching its maximum size at adulthood, in case of Rex was a little after 20 years old, then they stopped growing, like it happens with the majority with animals, after puberty and reaching adulthood they just stop growing, there are few exceptions in the wild(crocs may continue growing but very slowly), but the majority of animals works that way. Then what you are talking about the animals zoo life span is non-sense, actually the life span of animals in the wild is similar to the ones in the zoo. Saying that humans in the 1800's didn't lived more than 40 or 50 is ridiculous, just go check the age of dead of people known, people lived till their 70's, some 80's. Plus it was not discovered any T-Rex with 50 years old. You have to get your facts straight really...
As much as I love the T-Rex, I highly doubt they could grow THAT large, and if so, it must live well over 30 years.
I agree that is crazy size but I'm sure their was bigger then Sue and Scotty still to be found.
@@neganrex5693 I don’t think it would be much bigger that Scottie unless every single one we’ve ever found is tiny
@@tri-ify8852 Sue was 29 years of age and Scotty was 30 at time of death so that maybe a standard but everything living today has oversized ones. Trexs was also as large as them but younger and still had growing to do so that one would have ended up larger then them two. Most was around 16 years of age at death. If we had one in a zoo and not fighting living armored tanks day in and day out and each other would let us know how big they could really get. I'm thinking 45 feet at 14 or more tons.
@Varanus They found a toe bone they believe my have belonged to a T-Rex that would beat out Scotty and Sue easily and has not been proved yet that it does not belong to T-Rex so it's not been debunked that would put it around 14 US tons. It could belong to a hydrasaur that would also make it a bet oversized for what their was around at the time.
Since they have only found a hand full of T-Rex's and the chance of them finding the biggest that ever lived is next to zero so there is bigger out there. Almost every species on earth has oversize when it comes to big animals that get a little off the size chart.
I could see T-Rex getting 14 US tons and would be most likely a scavenger and meal time bully since it could take whatever it wants but also take down pray it's self. You see this in Grizzly Bears being oversized and stocking packs of Wolves cashing in on a free meal.
@Varanus It wouldn’t be slight. The average size of a saltwater crocodile is 17 feet but they can grow to 24 feet. That’s almost 50% bigger. Do you not think a rex could once in a while reach 45-50 feet long?
If T rex got 70% larger than it's size ( 11 tons) then how could any dinosaur defeat it? T rex would become invincible and unstoppable
That's the point
Sauropods
Spinosaurus: (sends out the military)
bro exactly this would cause everything to go extinct
The dinovengers vs the deceptosaurus dexes
That mega sized T-rex would’ve been the infamous Momma Dino from Ice Age 3 😂😂😂
Or The T. Dominium from Ark😂😂
I agree this is something you take with a grain of salt. As they said a Rex of that size appears to be mechanically possible, that is a fairly straightforward biomechanical question. Does the math and material science work? The question is not the mechanical feasibility, it's whether they DID reach that size. So far there is no evidence they did, merely the supposition that based on what remains we do have what would a top of the bell curve specimen look like, or one with gigantism. And that is pure speculation.
This T-Rex it looks damn tall
I know that non-avian dinosaurs are known for their massive size, the big ones anyway, but I'm taking this with a pinch of salt too. You have to take into account that T.rex was a terrestrial predator and while we know T.rex was a giant, if it got too big then hunting would be a problem. If it was too big it wouldn't be able to move as fast or agile, not to mention sneaking around is next to impossible for a sauropod sized therapod.
Of course
Present example is Lion
Lion having more food than tigers
But they are all smaller than Tigers
Because Lions can't amush easily in the open desert, so need Speed during hunting.
While Tiger could amush their prey easily in forest, so they don't speed that mush
Where Bears mostly eating fish but they are bigger because they don't need any speed to catch a fish.
Fan kids always want to increase the size
Kids don't know the difference between
Being Fatter is differ from Larger
T rex was actually incredibly agile and quiet when hunting.. you wouldnt even hear it approaching, thats how good they were.. adding a few extra kgs wouldnt stop that.. As for size and being a predator, bears are massive and share the same hunting grounds and smaller tigers and wolves and other smaller predators.. bear is still the king of their domain. They have no issues with food and neither would a trex
@@onmyway330yes and no. a lion isnt smaller because it needs speed, it doesnt need speed, it needs strength and numbers. Leopards are smaller and still arent as fast nor as strong but only take down small mammals. the cheetah is smaller as well but has speed but again, can only take down smaller prey.. These animals and their size has nothing to do with anything youve said, at all. A tiger is bigger because thats how it was created, not because it doesnt need to be fast. They are incredibly quick animals and probably quicker and faster than a lion.
If you are that big you don't have to move very fast. You need a good sense of smell and smaller predators to take prey off or massive lumbering prey.
I think that 15-16 meters and 15 tons+ is the maximum size. Anything over 16 meters sounds a bit too much.
15 meters the max length with 16-17 tons
ABOVE 16 METERS@@widodoakrom3938
This just proves that what we know about dinosaurs is outweighed by what we don't know.
Yeah they're going to be saying that again in about 20 years" it was actually bigger than what we thought in 2024" the average T-Rex height is about 15 ft. The Titanosaur is 122 feet tall and weight 65 tons a T-Rex was not messing with that
Mother Nature is always full of surprises..
It's always possible, but that would make the rex from Ark an accurate size. And we all know THAT beast is big enough to pick up a bull African elephant
Mega sized allosaurus -
Height - 8M(26.2 ft) tall
Length - 20M(65.6 ft) long
Weight - 15 tons(15.000 kg)
Why is there a frame of jfk in an interview with obscured captions at 1:52 ?
💀
If there's an issue with video editing, such as obscured captions, it could be an oversight during the editing process. It's always good to double-check for clarity and ensure the audience has the best viewing experience.
Fascinating about the possibility of a much larger trex
I really wish they tried this method for some of the prehistoric wildlife that's been getting the short straw in recent years in terms of size (Mosasaurus, Liopleurodon, Megalodon etc)
Lio was dramatically made big for that show its actually not unfortunately
We're still discovering living creatures out there that we'd never imagined.
. I image all these bones they dig up barely scratches the surface of what was once out there.
And to be honest I've suspected T-Rex WASN'T the baddest boy around in it's day.
Anyway, now I know what I want to see in the next Jurassic World movie.
Time for Rexy to grow up...
Ultima Rex 😅😂
Rexy’s already fully grown lmao. And she’s much larger than irl T-Rex specimens we’ve discovered so far lol.
@@Waaris_771 I figured they might make a 'new discovery'. Maybe Rexy is a species that eventually grows to a much larger size in it's 'old age'.
I figured the 'giant size T-Rex' was just too cool an idea to pass up in a dinosaur movie franchise..
And to be honest, now I really want to see it.
This New Rex would've been a Baddie during it's day
I wonder how much food a t Rex of that size would have to eat every day.
Who knows..its a miracle we have the fossils we do..who knows what animals may never be found..I could believe trex was even bigger then thought..don't we find animals overgrown once in a while? Trex was around what millions of years? That means many many possibilities..what a sight it would have been to see it in its prime..
Fossilization requires a rare set of circumstances and it's indeed remarkable that we have as many specimens as we do. T. rex's size estimates are based on the available fossil record, but with only a fraction of past life fossilized, larger individuals could have existed.
I mean, as one that follows news about Trex and wants to study them thoroughly in the Geoscience/Paleontological field, it could be possible that Trex could’ve been much bigger than what we once thought of such as Sue or Scotty for that matter. I mean, not to mention with more recent discoveries such as the Titanosaurids like Alamosaurus that could’ve lived at both the same time and place as our beloved Tyrant Lizard King, even with pack standards that’s a lot of sauropod to take down even at Alamosaurus being at a juvenile stage in life. Thus the theory that Trex (which I believe did hunt in packs due to theories off of fossil evidence) could’ve been bigger than we once thought? Not impossible 🤷♂️🦖 it was indeed the super predator of its time and ecosystem so anything is of course possible.
Cool video!!! Awesome!!! Dinosaurs are awesome animals!!!! Studying them is so interesting and cool!!
A picture with Indominus says it all about how serious it's all about
We only found 34 rexes. It not impossible since a ton of natural events could destroy alot of bones.
That would be insane… arthritis would be going crazy because of how heavy they are, but T. rex was one of the most efficient skull shape for a giant theropod predator and it could be true
It’s definitely feelisible that there were rexes far larger than scotty and sue, I don’t doubt there might have been old rexes that reached maybe 10 or 11 tons (keeping in mind that it wouldn’t be as drastic a physical SIZE change as displayed in your diagrams in the video, the hypothetical old rexes were likely extremely bulky much like abnormally large bears)
I seriously doubt any Rex got to 20+ meters / 15+ tons in weight, an animal that size would HAVE to be quadrupedal, so, definitely not Rex
My imagination is getting the best of me on this one. Alas... however, i digress
Hard to imagine two legs able to handle 50-60k. Even 20-30k on two legs seems ridiculous. Trex with his 30k lbs of hate walkin around all negative on two legs. Tiny arms. Everyone else has four legs and smaller. All lonely. Nobody likes him cause he eats everyone to death. 😆. Got to be tough to be a T-Rex
you a paleontologist or you just like capitalising words like "HAVE" to seem like you know stuff. I'll assume it's the second ;)
Maybe we've been getting the lifespan of the T-Rex all wrong, maybe they could have lived longer than we thought.
Thats a myth.
With the increase in weight, there will be an increase in bulk, and hence the centre of gravity would be shifted by the body, where the creature can be perfectly balanced.
Edmontosaurus and Shantungosaurus (15 tons, 20 tons) are perfectly capable of walking bipedal.
T rex can do it aswell.
a rex as far as i know there normal weight is 10 tons not 100 procent sure but yeah. So a rex that is 11 tons would be possible like a mutation.
What's going on at 1:53! Aliens I reckon...
Fun fact: c-megalodon is no longer the proper name, it was changed to otodus megalodon (making it closer related to bullsharks)
It's a giant Shortfin Mako Shark, not a Bullshark.
If there is not that much of them found. It might be just gigantism.
Some may argue that a bigger TRex would be too big to move fast enough to catch prey, however keep in mind that while it may have been slow, it was probably still faster than it's prey at the time, and if a TRex that's way larger as this video suggests, it may have been big enough to kill large Sauropods, not necessarily fully grown!
the trex is a hunter that sneaks up on its prey or it scavenges it doesnt chase down other creatures its body isnt built for long distance sprints
big stretch
@@ReivasMC Honestly, I think so too
@@dino0909 With some of the prey items around I don't think the chase would have been a high speed affair.
I remember reading that T-Rex has a height range of 12-23ft., length range of 40ft., & a weight range of 8 tons. Accurate or not? Please let me know.
23 feet is crazy
@@afk2167I’m going off of what the web says. Again let me know if it’s accurate or not.
I'm sure there were some outliers that got considerably larger but I don't think comparing humans to most animals is good for a comparison. We're the only species that has agriculture, medicines etc that have greatly affected our size. We're not special biologically but we have definitely had far more control over our environment than any other animal on earth. I think a better comparison would be animals of similar ilk. Maybe looking at the largest recorded ostrich or an emu and comparing to their average?
Mega t rex like look larger than monster resurrection spinosaurus 😊
Can’t we say this about any theropod? I mean char char and spino like the T rex have only a few ‘complete’ skeletons so could char char have been 23 meters? Or spino 25? I doubt it but I think there could of been specimens of the T rex reaching 15 meters, char char reaching 17 and spino reaching 20 meters. But I think these would be a rare site much like freak salmon that weigh 50 lbs
New Zealand salmon can reach 100lbs
@@widodoakrom3938 oh I know I do enjoy a bit of fishing but a 50 lb salmon is fairly rare
Yeah lol, this can be applied to any big theropod without many complete or nearly complete skeletons.
I think previous estimates of spinosaurus and charcharodontosaurus were 18m and 14m with max weights reaching 15+ and 10+ tones but were later changed.
@@dragonball_roxx4353 I think spino is 16 meters and char char is 13 or so but the spino is certainly longer then 13.5 meters
I've always thought that one of these days they're going to find a Therapod predator with a skull about 9 or 10 feet long. I am confident that the only reason they haven't found it yet is because they simply cannot believe what they're seeing, it's just too incredible for their eyes and mind to process. It's like missing a 1000 carat diamond because you've always been looking for 20 carat diamonds.
Considering the massive diversity we see in sizes of different dog breeds that all have nearly identical (species wise) DNA, as well as the massive diversity in the sizes and shapes we see in our own species, it stands to reason that many dinosaur species had diverse sizes and shapes while retaining the same DNA as well. I've often believed that many of the currently recognised species of dinosaurs are actually just different "breeds" of a smaller amount of species... but I'm not a scientist...
Dogs are so diverse in appearances because they have been selectively bred by humans, a chihuahua or pug in the wild would be far less adept than a German shepherd at surviving, and less likely to pass on its genes so eventually a more generalized, efficient shape would become the most common appearance for domesticated dogs. Same with wild animals, extreme mutations like that would be very rare, put extra burdens on survival, or eventually just get bred out of the species.
@@tau-5794 Sure, dogs were selectively bred by humans... but humans themselves have a very diverse range of sizes and shapes which occurred naturally. I'm not saying that every theropod must be the same species, and every sauropod must be the same species... I'm just saying that maybe there was a little more genetic diversity within some species than we can see just by examining their fossils.
@@livewire2759 I totally agree though the dog example dont work cause we've tampered with them to make them smaller and weaker, but i totally would think size ranges of animals would be much more diverse with millions of years without people fkn with them
@@theliftedpro I should have clarified why I used dogs for an example, but I didn't want to type out a whole book...
The point, really, is that if you test the DNA of any dog and compare it to any other dog, it will be nearly identical, indicating that there is a lot of... leeway... so to speak... in DNA. Therefore, individuals of a dinosaur species that existed for millions of years easily could have been widely diverse in size and shape while still technically being the same species, even without selective breeding by an outside actor. No, it's not the best example, but it was the most diverse example I could think of.
it was great
@@livewire2759
Just imagine they make a Jurassic Park remake and have this t Rex in the movie
Which study was this?
A hyped study
This rule doesn't only apply to T.rex but can apply to other megatheropods like giganatosaurus and carcharadontosaurus. Just putting it out there. Could it be that Saurophaganax is just a extremly large Allosaurus like for us seeing a 7 foot person. Who knows.
Indeed, the principle of gigantism is not exclusive to T. rex and applies to other megatheropods like Giganotosaurus and Carcharodontosaurus. These dinosaurs evolved to large sizes due to factors like prey availability, environmental conditions, and evolutionary pressures.
Not just fossils we've never uncovered but animals that never were fossilized or whose fossils have been destroyed. A very small percentile of animals have their skeletal remains preserved like that.
One of the more depressing things to come to terms with is there are many things we will simply never know about.
the issue is is that this is so speculative and in fairness due to how many trex skeletons we have found and the fact that this logic could be used for char char or giga or literaly any other theropod i think just wait until there is a verdict from most leading paleontologist's on this subject.
Universal’s gonna have to take notes for the next movie.
Rexy’s about to get a size Buff.
There are always outliers to any dataset. Speculating an outlier max size for any species is great and all, but it doesn’t mean much without the baseline data of averages.
T. rex was practically overpowered but now? Oh damn…
Ultra overpowered
I really don’t think this is possible for a Tyrannosaurus at all. Scotty was the largest at 43 feet (13.2 meters) long and 19,555 lbs, and that in itself is absolutely enormous. A bipedal creature to weigh in at anything over 10 tons is just insane. Gravity wouldn’t allow it, it’s legs would be crushed under its own weight.
Hm maybe
gravity quietly allows theropods to weigh more than 10 and 20 tons
2030: *Scientists in Tokyo have discovered a 300 metre long radioactive dinosaur skeleton near the city*
When they mean 70% bigger, they mean it more in weight terms
No, size too
I love how Tyrannosaurus rex means "tyrant lizard king", which sounds like a title for Bowser Koopa!
Now hang on a damn minute Tyrannosaurus Rex was not that Big that impossible
But if it was and this also applied to other mega theropods then imagine how big the Spino could be 😱
@@dadoprado208 spino is shorter and lighter
@@dadoprado208 Making the Tyrannosaurus larger overall makes it a more destructive unit, whereas just making the Spinosaurus larger doesn't change what it was (assumed to be) built for or capable of.
It's not impossible. Just unproven. The odds of us having the skeleton of the biggest Rex to ever live is astronomically small. We don't know how big they got, but it's reasonable to assume that they got significantly bigger than anything we know about.
@@DarthPyrusTheVirus I didn’t say it would change the Spino I just said imagine how colossal the Spino would be if this also applied to it.
If they existed today or I existed back then, I wouldn’t last AT ALL because I want to touch their little hand so bad 😅. Why do their hands have to be so cute 😂😂😂
When it comes to dinos almost everything is a theory and will always will be...ive always loved dinosaurs and always knew of them but it wouldn't be far fetched that a lot of dino skeletons might not be real, its probably stupid to some people but how many people were there to see a dinosaur skeletons being dug out. And who knows what technology out there could now especially make fake bones.
Itwould be very, very, very far fetched to suggest that any studied dinosaur fossils are not real.
I don’t think the T-Rex could get that big because being bipedal is a hard restrict of how big an animal can get so if the T-Rex would ever get to that size, it’s going to need a more robust side of limbs.
Argentinosaurus: but its still small!
Blue whale: So are you.
@@pratikgaikwad7472 we are talking about dinosaurs not animals
T rex the world's largest theropod dinosaur to ever live on earth
That is up for debate we are still finding stuff especially in the ocean and still finding new dinos so it's a relatively good chance at least one creature that was a predator that also was bigger then a rex
@@memeboi3448 totally wrong T. rex is the biggest or largest terrestrial predator to ever walk on earth
@@memeboi3448 “relatively good chance” NO
@@rodrigopinto6676 my guy you could be completely wrong
@@rodrigopinto6676 even if it isn't too good a chance it is still a possibility
Bro a 60ft long t-rex…if they prove this theory true t-rex will truly be the king of the dinosaurs.
Spino and irex fans be like after this video: emotional damageeeee
“bUT?!...BUt?!... SpInO Is gODzILla IncArnATe!!!”😢
@@jiraiyamagistrado lol get ur ass kicked up spino fanboy
Fossil findings suggest an average weight of about 6 tonnes for the T rex. Usually the biggest individuals of a species is around twice as big as the average size. So we could assume that the very largest T rex would weight up to 12 tonnes, similar in size to the biggest african bush elephant on record.
Rex's average weight is 18-24 tons
@@ДокторКраксman high💀
I think if an animal would be 20 meters it would be much heavier than 15 tons
Dang T-rex got alot of buffs that makes it a powerful dinosaur while Spinosaurus got alot of nerf and weakness and my fav long neck dinosaur amphicoelias got small
Anyways I like the video
It's entirely possible we've simply underestimated T. rex and overestimated Spinosaurus, and further discoveries have shined light on this.
I believe theres a few 15-17m rexes out there that havent been found yet. I kno they base evereything on “Sue” bc shes the most complete i just dont believe 40ft was the max size for a trex
It is a possibility that t-rex could possibly reach to a size of 13m. And a weight of 15 tones. Would be amazing to find fossils of a tyrannosaurus of that size
fossilization is a pretty rare process like winning a lotto ticket
this is really extremilly insane
The fact that this is being compared to a completely fictional animal (Indominus Rex) should tell you all you need to know.
“While Dr Malin confirmed on Twitter that he is tweaking” is crazyyy 😂😂😂 1:49
14 to 15 m was the old measurement of a rex I always thought, then they lowered it to 13m. But ya 15m seems doable
I’m no expert but do animals today have anything like that ?
A super sized T. rex? No. A Rhino is the closest you'll get
11 ton adolescent Rex?
5 ton juvi? 20-33 ton adult? Impossible
Maybe not be the size of a damn dragon, but maybe around the size of spino.
Could be wrong but I think that only around 40 individual specimens have been discovered, so trying to guess the size of the largest ones is a guess at best, but considering that there were probably many many millions of them over the years it’s certainly plausible that some were much larger than the ones we have found
Bite marks from something even bigger than Carcharodontosaurus were found on Ultrasaur and Argentinosaur bones. Not even its skull has been found yet. Sometimes... it's the predator we DON'T get to see, that's the scariest...
Tyrannosaurus Rex is still the biggest predator all the time so that's still a win. 🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖
The ultimate apex predator.
No other could stand against it👍🏻
The creation of a time machine can answer all question .
keep in mind if t rexes are 12 to 13 feet in height, then some of them might've been even bigger. This is probably the average size, some of them could be 15 or 17 feet. maybe even a few were 20 feet tall.
Very interesting....and VERY SCARY! lol haha
What started the shrink wrapping on dinosaurs?
The kid in me wants this to be true so badly
why does the video show that the big trex is 16 meters in lenght height
and whats the
15-ton meat-eating Dino - I'm glad that is no longer around.
If T. rex was 70% larger then it would literally be a real life ark giga except it’s a rex
Can you imagine getting your leg bit by one of those?
Being bitten by a large theropod dinosaur would have been a serious affair. Their teeth were adapted for different feeding strategies, from bone-crushing to flesh-slicing, which would have had different impacts on the prey.
What is the different between the three species
Before the proposal was rejected, T. imperator was believed to be the original species of tyrannosaurus that was ancestral to the other 2 species: T. rex and T. regina. Tyrannosaurus imperator and rex were almost identical with the only differences between them were the number of teeth and size with T. rex being the slightly bigger of the two. T. regina was said to be less stockier and a little smaller than the other two. But now it's accepted that these physical differences between tyrannosaurs are the result of variation between individuals rather than several different species.
@@dynamoterror18 so the rex is slightly bigger. And is he the one who have less teeth?
@@DankStudent I think T. imperator was the one with a few less teeth, but I could be wrong. It's been many months since I read the articles.
@@dynamoterror18 you know Everything about Dino your genius thanks for the learning lol
@@DankStudent You're very welcome! That means a lot.
A T. rex that size would be awesome
0:09 pretty sure some super crocs had stronger bite forces than rex.
“If not…hit the like button” LOL
Imagine if that trex fought ark gigantosaurus
It would still lose. Ark's Giga is a kaiju.
@@Bagelgeuse Yes!
*the trex just got larger*
Me:😮
*proceeds to do math in the vid*
Me:🥲🔫
Imagine what fossils are waiting to be discovered, the species waiting to be discovered.
press rex to doubt
Can't wait to see what the find
My Inner Child is going YEAAAAHHHHH, but the 33 Year Old Me will be Eagerly waiting for some New Discovery. But also makes you wonder how many OTHER Dinos Sizes did we get wrong...
If someone found a T Rex skeleton that big they' have the opportunity to become a millionaire, in fact I think a bidding war could push that to over a billion. Please make it be me 😂