Object 279 running in real life
Вставка
- Опубліковано 27 бер 2022
- Apparently the Russians are restoring this thing, very cool... Please don't send it to Ukraine.
In all seriousness, I couldn't find this ANYWHERE on YT and I ripped it off Discord. If the creator of this video doesn't want it on YT I'll delete it. - Ігри
0:12 It lost network connection to the ganjin server
PL:35%
Hahahahaha😂Yeees
Lol
lmao
The gayjin server hamster died for a sec
One of the coolest prototype tanks of all time a real piece of history and engineering i hope they wont damage it (it does not have parts unlocked yet)
hey a fellow war thunder person who suffers every day like me
No FPE? :(
@@StrikeWyvern NAHHH call some teammates and FPE? THIS IS NOT WOT AND WT IS BETTER OK NO OFENSE the grind is agreed but the gameplay (ITS ALMOST FUN)
@@itsalmostfun8567 Bro, no FPE in WT either! And you think a random teammate would give up an extinguisher charge?
@@StrikeWyvern wait does helping with firefighting consume your FPE?
Man, changing a road wheel on one of the inside tracks would be a technical nightmare.
There are some good reasons why this thing never entered service.
@Shaun Jones most definitely. This machine would be too complex to keep in service or mass produce.
Would it be more difficult than changing an inner roadwheel on a Tiger or Panther?
@@akizeta yes.
@@akizeta much more difficult!
we all know where this is going
Where it was destined, mars.
The place where capitalism didn't infested before, MARS
wait isn't called "stalins moonrover"
@@isu152stalin2 they had to rebrand it to marsrover after filthy capitalists reached the moon. Now it shall patrol mars!
@@charnq4766 yet
it will.
I've always pictured Object29 as this gigantic monstrous vehicle considering what it was designed for. Here it looked...just a taller tank compared to its contemporaries.
Well it only weighs 60 tons, it’s a superheavy, yes, just not Maus levels of Superheavy, most of its weight is in its extremely thick and well angled armor plating.
And they abandon it because it was garbage tank. No agility, no load, no amphibious capability( one of the main selling points).
@Cosmic Flash 60 tons isn't a super heavy, the challenger 2 weighs more in every variation 😂
@@dave6800at the time where tanks weighed half as much, it'd count as a superheavy
@CrimsonLancaster Lol what, tanks on average were definitely heaver back then. You're tripping, it's not a super heavy. The only ones going light at the time were the Germans who went dumbass mode and just gave up on trying to stop tank rounds and employeed the "nO aRmOr iS bEst arMoR" braindead take to little success ofc because it's fucking tank ofc you should give it proper armor. Crazy how long it took people to work out that more heavily armouring the front and limiting the side and back armor to auto cannon protection is a way better idea than using 80% of the front armor on the side and back which will end up letting through all the rounds the front armor would've protected while retaining the majority of the weight disadvantage. Bit of a rant but I'm saying with how weirdly tanks were being made until the 70's-80's you may be right but as far as I'm aware, you aren't
One of the coolest tanks of all time
Yes bro
😅😅joking? Motor Sounds like an old bulldog 😅😅
Also best "expectation vs reality" example.
@@thomasschafer7268. Joking ?, the Motor sounds pretty satisfying to hear
@@thomasschafer7268 Grow some new ears
Weird how no one else has posted this and it sort of just came out of nowhere. Hopefully it's real and it's a one-of-a-kind artifact being restored to running order!
There is 3 of them, one in kubinka, and one more in storage.
@@Pechenegus That I didn't know. I thought only one prototype survived!
@@Pechenegus Hate to sound like "that guy", but can I get a source? Everything I've heard states that out of the three prototypes built only one survived (on display at Kubinka), and I can't seem to find a source stating that there is another in storage.
Yeah Russia going to produce more
Why hopefully?
I always thought each track would have a form of differential steering such that the inner tracks would turn slower than the outer tracks during steering. It looks like each pair of sprockets is driven together as one. No wonder this tank was a pain to manoeuvre
Sadly seems like the otherside cannot do neutral steering either, simply just brake turning.
Too difficult to design for a homo sovieticus engineer who has always copied his designs
Something as simple as that put on a tank will add the cost of production to an already immense expansive tank lol, i think there's the factor of complexity to it since it barely has any room between those tracks
yeh as soon as they drove it once they decided 2 objects was enough. it looks like the traction gear is going through a lot of pain aswell, making breakage much faster
@@sl06bhytmar I was watching a video of the T14 Armata and was shocked when it demonstrated neutral steering. Others might exist but I don't think I've ever seen a Soviet MBT with it.
This feels illegal to watch so I hope you don’t mind me saving it
Go ahead, I saved it off discord man
@@StrikeWyvern thank you brother 🥰
thats OUR vid now xD
Сразу видно что человек все ЛБЗ выполнил на Объекта.
В картошке его нет, там выдумка с тем же названием(
😂😂😂😂😂
One example of the tank survives on display at the Kubinka Tank Museum, and was restored to running condition in 2022. That's what I can find
Так и есть в России он сохранился!
This is that tank
0:13 why did it look like the tank suffered from heavy packet loss 💀💀💀
LMAO
the rightmost pair of double tracks didn't move while the leftmost pair of tracks were moving. So it kinda "jogged in place"
half an inch up in air )
blud wanted boosie fade got this instead
"Black ops 1 menu theme playing In the background"
“You know I’m really tired of Wargaming pumping out fake vehicles. Realistically it won’t work cau-
THIS THING WORKS AND RUNS!”
needs a buff on its traverse speed tho
"THIS THING WORKS AND RUNS"
*Putin has entered that chat* SEND IT TO UKRAINE BLYAT
@@anemoia2661fake and not funny
@@anemoia2661 🥱
@@anemoia2661 Maybe putin sent your joke to ukraine becouse i don't see it
I've seen wide tracks before, but never dually tracks.
yeah I wonder why!
T28: *cough cough*
@@GhostOfDamned most of the time t28 (95) will not have the outer track on for faster maneuver and speed
@@vsyokhoroshoyThe T28 was a prototype and weighed 95 tons, the outer tracks being removeable was solely to fit it on a train car, the thing would’ve eaten the suspension and sank into the ground without the outer track modules.
@@barryallenporter8127 but in actually combat situation in europe (if it was used) it will not use the outer tracks to fit on the bridges,city road and stuff like that
Now if we can just get the IS-7 up and running....
Hmm, let's sell it in a bundle for 8700 GJN
absolutely beautiful piece of history here!
thank you for documenting this, we salute you!
Wow only 3 were made and they still have this one in running condition
Bruh I thought this was just a concept tank lmao
Nope, it was actually built
It is the best heavy tank ever built, with the best armor, best gun and mobility, nothing could pen it in 1959 when it was built
@@Maverick966 With it's slope armor and no advanced HEAT or APFSDS. Only AP, APCRs, APHE, HE and old HEAT rounds were unable to pen this guy. Not really best with its downsides but it is a hard nut to crack indeed. Until new rounds developed of course.
@@assaulthetz380 In the 60s it was impenetrable, it had a lot less downsides compared to previus heavy tanks, Soviets didn't put it in production just because they were abandoning the heavy tank doctrine in favor of T-55 and T-62
@@icy3-1 was there three of em
Shes alive!
*Happy evil laugh*
Armor design on this thing is absolutely masterful, amd even if treads are hit there's two redundant ones for backup.
It’s a significantly more usable t95
@@megaaggron9778 Yeah, T-95, but good tank be like.
All the angled armors are useless lol. The are where the tracks are is very thin armored
@@ir-m95 > All the angled armors are useless
Why so?
@@youtubeuser_custom_1 Modern ammo hardly cares about this things angles
The true War Thunder newbies menace
Repairing the inner set of tracks has to be a nightmare.
Imagine it getting stuck in mud too...
@@AmericanFire Imagine getting this stuck in mud in the first place. Now THAT would be a challenge. This might be one of the best tanks for getting out of mud ever build
but at the same time the technicality was made so that it runs atleast on the minimum amount of 2 working tracks, i forgot where i read about it, but also the 279 could detach any of its 4 running gear tracks and carry on. Much like the tire-driven tank prototypes
@@Clawwingo you have any sources? i also thought if it lost 2 or one of its tracks it might carry on without them but i just wanna be sure
@@AmericanFire This kind of tank is very unlikely to be stuck in mud, since thats what 4 tracks are for. The weight vs pressure area on the ground is 4 times less then other tanks.
There is a Russian version of this video which has longer duration and confirms this was in Kubinka. And it was posted close to 2 weeks ago
Edit: Link is in the reply section
Link? I wanna see more of this monster moving!
@@StrikeWyvern me To it fk top man
@@StrikeWyvern ua-cam.com/video/hmkMTKZt9J4/v-deo.html
Sauce plz
its called Объект 279 на ходу в Кубинке
Dear santa.
I see the red colour as impenetrable armor 😅
Not against APFSDS and HEAT though
POV: War Thunder players found the blueprint and the Object 279 itself in the old old man's hangar
😂
Holy mother of Christ, it WORKS???
Same thought. Probably off to go fight in Ukraine :P
Yeah russian weapon quality is really next level
@@matura93 Its very old prototype (NOT VERY) ITS DESIGNED IN 1959?! LIKE DUDE it doesnt have much on it it doesnt have newer shells or maybe the armourplates that explodes in impact (REDUCES PENS TO NON) and yes i prefer the T90 A design dont matter if T90 vs 5 of 279s T90 could r/outtekweirdthings stuff like the armour that reduces pens and better nightvision my favorite turret rotation
@@itsalmostfun8567 the old cannon breach could exploded the shell and kill all the crew
This thing was and is a work of art imo. If it was property retrofitted it may actually be useful. But I doubt it will and despite its armor and loading mechanism is obsolete to newer tanks. I still love this tank.
Nah, this tank is history. It's unlikely have any superb speed. Difficulty producing, difficulty repairing. Plus the modern warfare - this armor is useless, since it's time for lighter armor and more active armor. There is zero info on its electronics and scope systems, they are absolete due to its time.
This would make for a challenging model build. As of the moment, all of the available kits of this tank, in both 1/35 and 1/72, have modeled the hull (upper and lower) as one continuous piece. As can be seen in the video, the actual tank used metal skirts attached to the hull to achieve its distinctive UFO shape. What makes this video so invaluable to the modeler is that it shows all of the previously hidden detail of the hull, skirt mounts, braces and frames. What I find particularly interesting is the contrast between the crisp flowing lines of the skirt panels compared to the wavy, almost crude appearance of the cast hull. Making this thing as shown would require major surgery to any of the existing kits followed by a lot of finnicky scratch building. It would look pretty awesome if it could be pulled off, though.
I've modeled it before in Lego. I've done way larger vehicles with motorization and RC control. This thing at a tiny scale was the hardest thing I've ever worked on. It's a nightmare to get looking right.
This is absolutely magnificent. I am so happy to see one working and being driven like this.
War Thunder Russian mains bookmarking this thinking it will be a viable strategy to win arguments against everyone saying that it shouldn't be in the game.
Lol😂
The beast breathes once more.
Valuable footage
“Attack the A point!”
Notice the complex (and probably the reason it failed) rear end sprocket wheels. Seems like multiple connections and gears to drive the power fom the engine to the sprocket wheel.
I honestly don't see how it could have anything else but a big chain drive in there. It just seems like whatever is in there isn't gonna hold up. Russia has great natural resources, but, well, they don't really have the best reputation for metallurgy.
@@l337pwnage mate SR-71 was built with russian titanium
@@Klovaneer Doesn't really go against my point. My S&W also uses Russian titanium. Like I said, they got great resources. If Russia hadn't fallen to Soviet Communism, they would've been a true super-power, and not just one on paper with a strong military.
They got real potential now with Putin, but it's hard to know whose side he is really on, other than his own. A century of communism, tho, might be too much to expect a recovery from.
Странно. Честно говоря думал что ни одной единицы этой машины не дожил до наших времен. Через пару дней слетают в Москву, в кубинку. Посмотрю на танк маус и потом найду объект 279. Но до этого заеду в музей в Москве. Хочу увидеть самый большой вертолёт в мире w12
Да да а потом проснешся мокрый от возбуждения 🎉
А кто сказал,что 279 в Кубинке?,какой то неухоженный и раскрас непонятен...
стоит один на весь мир обьект 279 в Кубинке .... а на видео или он в ремонте или склепали из тех двух что так и недостроили в те годы ...
As much as everyone is swooning over Obj 279, I want to see its competitor designs Obj 277 and Obj 770 moving.
I'm glad you mentioned these. Now I don't feel so bad about missing out on the obj 279 in war thunder.
Awesome video you rock be safe out there happy new year
this thing over preasured me in the fields of poland
Из плюсов инжинерной мысли сцепление с дорогой на любой местности лучше, реже застревает. Также при повреждении одной гусениц из двух пар не обездвижет танк полностью. Ну а из минусов значительно хуже маневренность, медленнее повороты, больше потребление топлива, больше вес танка. Сомнительное решение в целом то. Маневренность приоритет так то. Еще и при повреждении 2 средних гусениц чинить их куда сложнее в полевых условиях
0:13 driver had too high ping
Average war thunder moment
Soviet stronk stalinium moon rover
this tank is for survival in the atomic war.
@@alexforelorngoldfinch1750 I know that’s why the hull is shaped like a pancake to absorb the shockwave
es absoluta y terriblemente hermosa esa cosita como se mueve 🥲 lo siento si exagerado pero soy tan fanático de esta obra de arte tanques de guerra y Battleships 😍
Can’t believe it’s real and working
Mom: go outside and play with your friends
War thunder players:
As an german engineer i have to say "chapeau". These were the golden times of science and engineering in the USSR.
I can't imagine the absolute *HELL* it must be to break the inner tracks once it's 2 feet deep in mud.
279 has a remarkably low weight per square meter of ground contact, and would not sink into the mud like it’s contemporaries, despite it’s significant weight. Also it is capable of driving with one track from each side being missing.
@@UHOH3300 All true, but there are situations where that is irrelevant. "Capable" doesn't mean you're going to do it. In combat, yes. In training, no. And simply getting under it and trying to wield a tankers bar and sledgehammer is going to be very tough.
max is right, weight distribution will equal mobility mud is the king in Ukraine. The 4 set of tracks will be good for self-propelled artillery but not in combat. The Abrams tank at140 tons will sink in asphalt roads and will only be useable for 3 months of the year. Pickup trucks will get you there.
I don't think you can crawl under the middle and still have enough leveraged force to make it lose…even a slim ass like me can't do it, lol.
Classic case of an engineer not having a clue about maintaining/repairing equipment.
Object 279= Whomst has awaken me?
Putin= Bow down to your new master, Objevt 279.
Obj 279= When will the apocalypse come, so i can serve you master?
Putin= soon, my servant. Soon.
Obj 279= finally i can show Krushchev i matters. Ura!
Later same day- Hey Putin, where is my fuel?
@@yourmother9359 in texas . go and get it бу га га .
@@yourmother9359 gas machine broke, sorry
later object 279: Ura Master Zelensky!
@@petep8828 the most cringe comment I've ever seen
It's like I can hear the tank saying "my knees... all 4 of my knees... they hurt"
Golem Tank Ready to rumble!
Rise of the reds?
@@Mizuki-lr3hb yes
I still can't believe object 279 even exist let alone move but this video is the prove that it can
СССР не существует, но зато сколько детищ коммунисты оставили, что жадным капиталистам и не снилось
It is 63 years old.
INDEED wait yes yes yes I AGREE
He's like: F*CK YOU KHRUSCHEV I'M STILL MOVIN'.
Just gorgeous
Никогда его таким не видел. Интересно какого года съёмка.
I would choose to buy this tank if it park behind a Lamborghini 👏😘
Wow! only 3 prototypes were ever built, Im so glad to see this lat 50's UFO on the move
Beautiful explanation why this one never saw production :)
wow, the Russians getting a bit desperate for tanks in the Ukraine?🤣🤣
ahah no 😐
this tank go to a museum to an other, plus Russia is producing more tanks than Ukraine is receiving form NATO.
i won't even comment on this one
you just did @@mrkeykush693
It's a UFO but it drinks vodka
They actually do have a real flying flying saucer in Kubinka too, as a plane prototype
It just looks like it is on the brink of falling apart
0:13 Moonwalk tank
Seen one at Kubinka Museum outside of Moscow 2019/ 20. It looks like this was filmed there. Once finished, it will be off to the new Patriot Park 7 km's closer to Moscow. The biggest and easy the best Tank Museum in the world. Warehouses full of staff cars, armoured cars. Space collection, all manor of jets and helicopters, live fire range, tank biathlon park etc etc etc guess they will get some new tanks soon too - Abrams, Leos and Challengers among others. I have a few pics of it and many other one off tanks protos - Maus and only Carl Mortar - Adam which is really Zeus. ps don't believe the rubbish about Russia using older tanks in Ukraine. US Military have already confirmed Russian main military is still intact.
or maybe it's being restored for actual action. with Putins war going on.
Ввели армию в 200.000..
Отходить от Киева начали и провели мобилизацию на 350.000..
Сейчас говорят о нехватке людей и проводят частичную мобилизацию.
Где армия? Куда делись 550.000?
Про танки и снаряды, вообще можно не говорить - пригожин не раз это подтверждает.
@@dimak3509 Димон, да никого уже нет, ни техники, ни людей, ни снарядов, одно только непонятно, почему великие укры на Абрамсе всё ещё не в Москве
it will not@@sheyrd7778
@@dimak3509550 тыщ это как раз после частичной мобилизации. И они никуда не делись. Про нехватку снарядов - своему лечащему врачу расскажи, он тебе нужные таблетки пропишет.
0:12 Why's it lagging?
They're in a forest, connection is weak
@@iota515 Lol.
Although I doubt this thing will be ever brought as a guest tank for Tank Fest one year if they ever did boy I bet you it sell some tickets
This is awesome! There is a game called Cold War: The Cuban Missile Crisis /Tactical RTS/ This was the top Soviet Tank and it was a beast, only arty or air strikes could damage it.
Officially wet
Wow, I always thought that was a 'paper' tank that was designed but never built. Very cool.
Only three were allegedly completed and there is still at least ONE in running order.. not gonna lie impressive.
0:11 World of Tanks server disconnections are more realistic than I thought..
steamed crab
Maybe they can update the steering mechanism, that thing struggled to turn on hard surface
you would need additional transmissions and a way to pass the drive shafts through the inner linkage without hindering it, doesnt seem practical
@@T0tenkampf Eh just add neutral steering in the transmission, assuming the 1st gear has enough range and tourqe it would turn much quicker than this with the other track side helping out.
What the actual fuck, they had more models hidden
Russia about to pull out all Object Prototypes in order to fight Ukraine
@@someoneinthecaucasus3232 yeah the chances arent slim
@@someoneinthecaucasus3232 no there not gonna put this things in ukraine
@@mrfloaty7253 is It a joke or are you dumb ?
the most badass killing machine ive ever seen in my entire life
omg it's stalins moon rover XD
It's more beautiful then I ever could have imagined. I might cry. I need to see this beutiful beast in person. I'm in love
Товарищ, парк "Патриот" ждëт тебя)
Some fluid is leaking out from underneath this beast. Is it bleading oil?
its old vodka trust
ive seen enough warthunder too know what would happen if this thing got sent to ukraine
Он зажарит пару хохлов
"I am going to the one place where hasnt been corrupted by capitalism, *breathes* S P A C E!!! "
This tank gives me cancer in War Thunder
HEATFS/APFSDS/ATGMs give me cancer when I play mine
Imagine WG sees this video and decide to put the tank in the game
Technically the early one's already in game
@@StrikeWyvern yea but it’s not the actual tank itself. Just something they pulled out of their ass.
it is already in war thunder after all
this is from kubinka museum?
I believe so, I couldn't put a location in there.
yes it is :)
Amazing to see!
Could you imagine having to do repairs on the inner tracks?
I am amazed that this still works, if there is something that the Russians know how to do it is tanks
Says the thousand of burnt out Russian tanks in the middle east and Europe 😂
@@johncitizen5130 probably because of the thousands of anti tank weapons provided by nato
How long do you think we in the UK would last if for example, our tanks were solely against the thousands of anti tank missiles NATO have provided.... the answer is not very long at all
Tank on tank russian tanks are suitable, not amazing but also not the worst around either .
But when the enemy is a drone above you . Or a javelin coming from above , there really arned many tanks that would survive
Its easy to sit and think that this is ukraine and russia at war, but in reality the only reason Ukraine can even fight back is mainly down to western supplied weapons.....
Russia is merely a speed bumb on the road to war with china anyway . My convern isnt the russia - Ukraine war. But the inevitable war with china
you think? Why is it that in every actual combat arena where Russian made designs have faced tanks like the Abrams, Merkava, etc that they have lost? They were way ahead of the bar in the 1940s when they were smart enough to accept the Christie design along with the foresight to use diesels in their theater but since then they have been proven to be paper tigers. I have actually inspected T72 and T64 up close and the quality was pretty meh.
@@T0tenkampf but the price tag was relatively more cheaper than most western tank. It’s definitely not as good most nato tanks tho, but it sure is a lot easier to mass produced and maintained than western tanks that’s also why that most countries and organizations prefer to use the soviet tanks
@@ferdiansyahhilmi3016 So easy to maintain they are resurrecting a tank class from over 60 years ago...
They really are getting desperste haha
Don't smile, it's tactical.
Now it's time to get the is7 moving
Could you imagine replacing an inner track on that thing
i better not see this with a big fuck off z on it in Ukraine
Armor is weak against KE and CE cause of noncomposite armor.
@@rinaldoman3331 Its armor can defeat at least RPG-7, it was designed to withstand US 90mm HEAT that had 320 mm of penetration
@@Maverick966 320? thats nothing abrams 400 400? thats nothing leopard 460 460? and so on
@@Maverick966 and suprise suprise modern tank main armor piercing is Kinetic round not Chemical round which means your armor argument is useless
This tank was pretty advanced for it's time even though it had some flaws
Yeah, some said it is protected against radiation if... somehow the Nuclear war started in the Cold war era.
@@assaulthetz380 Im not sure how protected the crew would be but the hull shape was designed so it could be within a fairly short distance of a blast and not roll over.
@@foughtwolf i think that t-72 has also anti radiation protection
@@foughtwolf It have a layer of dense material between it's steel armor. Radiation can't penetrate that cloak.
@@riza-2396 Also AC unit and filtering system. These were installed in all soviet tanks and APC and were very useful during chernobyl.
On his way to capture the D point.
0:11 bro he go packet loss fr 💀💀📉📉
Już sobie wyobrażam rozmowę o tym co zrobić z czołgiem 😅
-Panie Putin co z tym?
-Co to jest?
- Na moje oko. Szmelc.
-Co proponujesz?
-Naprawić, podmalować jako tako tu i tam. I opchnać na Ukrainę
This is museum piece
@@pyro7358 I don't think you understood.
it was a reference to a Polish animation called "Kapitan bomba".
Chętnie bym takiego zapierdolił z ukrainy XD
He going to Ukraine? 🤣 Let's go. Drones waiting 😉
how insanly stupid are you like why would you even think that?
People often forget that this tank has less ground pressure than most of the military vehicles in the world, and even less than average human.
Around 8.6 PSI I believe. The design was just too complex and heavy for its own good.
@@StrikeWyvern yeah, making "nuclear proof" beast with 130 mm cannon from scratch, when T-55A existed was kinda not worth it. But it wasn't "too heavy", because all heavy tanks has been considered obsolete by that time.
@@RaikoTechnologies I say it was too heavy due to the fact that heavy tanks were obsolete, and also the fact that there was a rule in the USSR that a tank couldn't be over 48 tons. This one was 60.
It's a Soviet era koncept tenk, bild in great seekresy in the 1960 is. It's only build four of theme. Tvoo dident sorvive the tests, the oder 's are in museum. The tank didn't have chanse against a jevelin
i dont see how a 6 ft long stick from the olympics can kill a tank designed to survive nukes
Normal people: Huh, Ukraine will take this tank down!
People who play world of tanks: We didn't even scratch them
The guy who knows every tank in the world: Nuclear war confirmed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
IN WARTHUNDER its simmilar in WOT i play both of them BUT IN WT ITS BIASED
@@itsalmostfun8567 Dunno about Biased in a Custom battles.
One APFSDS from a 120mm german/american/japanese/EU MBTs going to penetrate every part of this tank if it showed up... Even helicopters would have a field day while hovering miles away.
@@itsalmostfun8567 Well.. unless those rounds somehow goes to the Void, so yes, it may be biased.
279vs javelin ? Winner?
winner - SS-18 Satan
Even against M1 Abrams, Leopard 2 and Merkava the Javelin would easily win
@@Maverick966 Western tanks have APS systems, Russians tanks neglected theirs
considering the fact that i saw a simulation of an is7 can deflect a yamato round than there is no way a caveman can hurt stalins moon rover
Truly the tank of all time
DM23:
- Tasty food.
How long until we see it being towed by a Ukrainian tractor?
Never
bad idea of a joke, this chad tank was designed to withstand nuclear bomb and its really heavy. this tank will blow the tractor without even touching it
Dunno if a Tractor can pull this thing off with its weight.. MBTs aside, i don't think the Tractor can carry this huge heavy beast.
My guy do a bit of research, it weighs about 60 tons and has 300mm or more armor, it will never get destroyed
@@TrendkillGR7 Aside from old AP shells.
Modern APFSDS might slice 300mm of armor like swiss cheese. As it could eat 1000mm+ equivalent of rolled steel from a composite armor.