Not a fair comparison. Diva is the only one using stereo ping-pong delay, which somehow emulates the unison effect, making it sound much wider and stereo.
That's a good point that I didn't even think about. I'll see if I can find a comparable delay for the other VSTs. But I will say that I'm not a pro at this lol. I don't know much about using delay effects.
wow. super helpful short and sweet. awesome. thank *YOU* which one is your go to or preference? the diva kind of sounded warmer. the pigments 3 had more movement.
Thanks. I prefer Diva as I think it has the closest sound to an analog synth. I haven't spent too much time on Massive X or Pigments 3, but I think Diva's sound is better.
I think Diva has the best sound. Pigments has some nice modulation features though. I've heard from others that you can get a good sound out of Massive X. I don't like the interface though and they don't have any oscilloscope or envelope diagram to see how you are shaping the sound.
Sorry I'm confused here. Are you referring to the Samsung ur55 monitor for gaming? I think you posted on the wrong video lol. I can still help you though, but I don't have much to say on recommended settings as I just went with minimal configuring.
@@vatolegato Massive and Massive X are special for the same reason... the FX SECTION. Any recent wavetable/subtractive synth can do what Massive does and WAY better today, but Massive still has the most unique engineered FX for exploring sonic possibilities than any other VST.
@@vatolegato prime example: Initialize a basic saw, then pass it through the "anima" FX, already you can create sounds that no other synth can make since this FX is uniquely engineered and cannot be recreated easily.
Massive X sounds very good to me, but the problem with Massive X - it's unable to remember presets from session to session. In Logic Pro, you pick a Massive X preset on Monday. You reopen the project on Tuesday, that preset selection is gone, and Massive X has reverted to "init". So lame. For that reason alone Pigments is more "robust" and reliable. And I love Diva a lot for its sounds.
I didn't know. Massive does seem to have a lot to offer as far as features and modulation, but I don't know much about it and don't know how to really use it. Pigments looks easier to use.
Not a fair comparison. Diva is the only one using stereo ping-pong delay, which somehow emulates the unison effect, making it sound much wider and stereo.
That's a good point that I didn't even think about. I'll see if I can find a comparable delay for the other VSTs. But I will say that I'm not a pro at this lol. I don't know much about using delay effects.
Diva best, massive nice interface easy to use for me, pigments to colored sound in all presets
after comparing this video I've fall in love with Massive again :)
wow. super helpful short and sweet. awesome. thank *YOU* which one is your go to or preference? the diva kind of sounded warmer. the pigments 3 had more movement.
Thanks. I prefer Diva as I think it has the closest sound to an analog synth. I haven't spent too much time on Massive X or Pigments 3, but I think Diva's sound is better.
Diva sounds the best, Pigments not warm at all.
not everything needs to be warm. Digital harshness (Serum/Pigments) is better for crispy dubstep basses.
I have them all and they are all great
There is always a way to make each of them sound warm , deep and very analog.I can even make Pigment sound better than Diva
@@robmlisanti I agree! You can always make an analogue for each of them it's not a problem at all.
This short video summarizes very well the differences. Massive X sounds thin, Pigments sounds nice but Diva really sounds thick and warm.
Thanks!
I think Diva has the best sound. Pigments has some nice modulation features though. I've heard from others that you can get a good sound out of Massive X. I don't like the interface though and they don't have any oscilloscope or envelope diagram to see how you are shaping the sound.
A modern-day warrior
Mean, mean stride
Today's Tom Sawyer
Mean, mean pride
I know Rush has the filter sweep in that song, but this one was based off Van Halen - Jump.
hello.sorry i am posting here.my r550 monitor arrived yesterday.thanks for your guides.i like monitor.i am trying to find best config for myself.
Sorry I'm confused here. Are you referring to the Samsung ur55 monitor for gaming? I think you posted on the wrong video lol. I can still help you though, but I don't have much to say on recommended settings as I just went with minimal configuring.
@@vatolegato yes ur55.i buyed one.yes i should post on older video sorry.i am trying to do best setting on it.
Massive x is supreme for me
What do you like about Massive X compared to other comparable VSTs?
@@vatolegato Massive and Massive X are special for the same reason... the FX SECTION. Any recent wavetable/subtractive synth can do what Massive does and WAY better today, but Massive still has the most unique engineered FX for exploring sonic possibilities than any other VST.
@@vatolegato prime example: Initialize a basic saw, then pass it through the "anima" FX, already you can create sounds that no other synth can make since this FX is uniquely engineered and cannot be recreated easily.
@@mechwarreir2 Which wavetables do you think are better and in what ways?
Massive X sounds very good to me, but the problem with Massive X - it's unable to remember presets from session to session. In Logic Pro, you pick a Massive X preset on Monday. You reopen the project on Tuesday, that preset selection is gone, and Massive X has reverted to "init". So lame. For that reason alone Pigments is more "robust" and reliable. And I love Diva a lot for its sounds.
I didn't know. Massive does seem to have a lot to offer as far as features and modulation, but I don't know much about it and don't know how to really use it. Pigments looks easier to use.
My exact problem with Massive X