✅Check out Playlist For Full Saban Defense Here: ua-cam.com/play/PL9V3DzeJXWCEXsxR_-hi1lNfELTaY_boD.html 👑Check Out Scheme Kings Here: www.schemekings.com/
The problem is in match coverage 3 x 1 the game is not coded for the safety to read Wr 2 & 3. One of them goes on a streak route it’s open. Or slot seam plays are free TDs
Not always the case, blown coverages happen. There’s times where I run match 3x1 & it locks everything up or someone pops open. It really depends on the route concepts & play design. If a certain play puts the safety in a situation where they have to choose which defender to commit too then that’s just good offense, everyone thinks that you can stop everything when that’s not the case at all. Play too much zone you’ll get torched, play too much man you’ll get torched. If you take away the deep ball you leave practically everything underneath, if you try to take away anything underneath you leave the overtop open. It’s all about down & distance.
@@BigGameMorg the problem is that match coverage with correct rules can match against most formations. Minus motions and certain route combinations of course
Great video, I needed a new defense/change up against empty/5 WR sets. I get gave a lot of 4 verts, shallow, mesh concepts where it's hard to decide which crossing route to chase.
So do since the scheme has both man and zone principles involved, do you think since the play called is “zone” do you think the zone stat matters more or do your outside corners who are in MEG do you think man stat matters more. Just curious, because right now most positions you either have to pick a zone coverage or man coverage defender.
I was kind of wondering this too. I got the top recruit in the nation (5 star gem CB) who’s a 92 man coverage and 76 zone. I play zone schemes and was looking at running this but want to make sure it’s not going to nerf his ability since it’s a zone scheme.
@@kevionwhite8806yeah that often confuses the match principles. I think match especially quarters is best when you know assignments and play and safety, that way you control for any potential CPU match busts
✅Check out Playlist For Full Saban Defense Here: ua-cam.com/play/PL9V3DzeJXWCEXsxR_-hi1lNfELTaY_boD.html
👑Check Out Scheme Kings Here: www.schemekings.com/
Do you sell an Ebook of the Saban D? With qts, palms, willie and anything else?
King I’ve been watching you for a few years. Great minds think alike. I’ve been running Willie and confusing opponents.
The problem is in match coverage 3 x 1 the game is not coded for the safety to read Wr 2 & 3. One of them goes on a streak route it’s open. Or slot seam plays are free TDs
Not always the case, blown coverages happen. There’s times where I run match 3x1 & it locks everything up or someone pops open. It really depends on the route concepts & play design. If a certain play puts the safety in a situation where they have to choose which defender to commit too then that’s just good offense, everyone thinks that you can stop everything when that’s not the case at all. Play too much zone you’ll get torched, play too much man you’ll get torched. If you take away the deep ball you leave practically everything underneath, if you try to take away anything underneath you leave the overtop open. It’s all about down & distance.
Cover 3 Buzz Match was made for 3x1 sets.
C4 Palms is match and should be solid against 3 by 1 formations. And it is the best run defense in the game.
@@Dj252king #3 on a streak and #2 WR on a post, 10 yard dig or crosser is a free TD against cov 4 palms
@@BigGameMorg the problem is that match coverage with correct rules can match against most formations. Minus motions and certain route combinations of course
Great video, I needed a new defense/change up against empty/5 WR sets. I get gave a lot of 4 verts, shallow, mesh concepts where it's hard to decide which crossing route to chase.
The cover 3 match Mable is a good counter for those empty sets. It’s in the 3-3 nickel formation
I think this can work really good for empty or i love Palms!
Any offense set ups that destroy this defense cause hate running match coverage
So do since the scheme has both man and zone principles involved, do you think since the play called is “zone” do you think the zone stat matters more or do your outside corners who are in MEG do you think man stat matters more. Just curious, because right now most positions you either have to pick a zone coverage or man coverage defender.
I was kind of wondering this too. I got the top recruit in the nation (5 star gem CB) who’s a 92 man coverage and 76 zone. I play zone schemes and was looking at running this but want to make sure it’s not going to nerf his ability since it’s a zone scheme.
Yeha im not 100% sure but i think it is a mic of both! It is something i might have to make a video on testing in the future!
Do you have a formation/coverage for someone who is always in gun wide?
This can work really good for it or i love Palms
In cfb25 do my corners/safeties follow these rules when controlled by the computer
Yes sir!
some of yall are just brain dead. what kind of question is this. you must be lost
Excuse hello there I’m curious on what is the name of the playbook or do I have to purchase it?
Its a seperate membership on Scheme Kings
@@KingReggieMadden thank you ☺️
what about bunch formation?
Here is what i use vs bunch: ua-cam.com/video/E0hHOnyXmqw/v-deo.html
Does this work against bubch
Yes it works against Bunch.
@@Brutus34100 I noticed while using it that on the cover 4 side the safety and outside corner dumb out of the run a scissor concept
@@kevionwhite8806
While it's not perfect. You'll need to manually control those Hot areas. Bro, just lab it some and you will be shutting things down.
@@kevionwhite8806exactly why I stopped running match coverage
@@kevionwhite8806yeah that often confuses the match principles. I think match especially quarters is best when you know assignments and play and safety, that way you control for any potential CPU match busts
Say what
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
When I first saw this coverage I'm like noooooo
Why
Jesus Christ loves you all
Believe in the Messiah Jesus Christ for eternal salvation
Amen
👀
this is a no
Why?