In clustered vs non-clustered comparison, both queries state "Both of them state "This query will process 625G when run". But they report different volumes of actually processed data: [8:30], non-clustered example: 1min+ for 625G *processed* [9:00], clustered example: 12s for 22G *processed* Is it a fair comparison? Or I am missing something?
Can you please share the algorithm used for encryption and decryption. Our bank needs to start sending those values now. So we need to know the algorithm. Like is it AES 256 or AES 128 etc?
I see the way you explain is great compared to what you did on 2015. Coming to the content, excellent stuff. Thanks
In clustered vs non-clustered comparison, both queries state "Both of them state "This query will process 625G when run". But they report different volumes of actually processed data:
[8:30], non-clustered example: 1min+ for 625G *processed*
[9:00], clustered example: 12s for 22G *processed*
Is it a fair comparison? Or I am missing something?
see [17:30]
Can you please share the algorithm used for encryption and decryption. Our bank needs to start sending those values now. So we need to know the algorithm. Like is it AES 256 or AES 128 etc?