What causes rare rainbow arcs? - Sixty Symbols

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 сер 2024
  • Professor Mike Merrifield discusses semi-rare circumzenithal arcs and even rarer supralateral arcs.
    More links and info below ↓ ↓ ↓
    More videos with Professor Merrifield: bit.ly/Merrifie...
    More weather-type videos like this one: bit.ly/Weather_...
    HaloSim: www.atoptics.c...
    Astronomy Picture of the Day featuring arcs by Magnus Edback: apod.nasa.gov/...
    Mike on Twitter: / astromikemerri
    Brady on Twitter: / bradyharan
    Visit our website at www.sixtysymbol...
    We're on Facebook at / sixtysymbols
    And Twitter at / sixtysymbols
    This project features scientists from The University of Nottingham
    bit.ly/NottsPhy...
    Patreon: / sixtysymbols
    Sixty Symbols videos by Brady Haran
    Editing and animation in this video by Pete McPartlan
    www.bradyharanb...
    Email list: eepurl.com/YdjL9
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 254

  • @General12th
    @General12th 5 років тому +99

    Thanks to H.I. episode 121 for pointing me here.

  • @quahntasy
    @quahntasy 5 років тому +166

    Noone explains as good as Professor Mike. Thanks to Brady for bringing such a nice explanation to us.

    • @xyz.ijk.
      @xyz.ijk. 5 років тому +4

      @@quantumhelix8668 ... and still somehow makes me *not* feel like an idiot.

    • @Triantalex
      @Triantalex 14 днів тому

      false.

  • @veggiet2009
    @veggiet2009 5 років тому +49

    Best animations I've seen so far to demonstrate the process of 'rainbow-like' phenomena

    • @MushookieMan
      @MushookieMan 5 років тому +2

      But the animation is wrong, or at least misleading. The crystals that refract light into your eyes are in a circular array. It only showed refraction through a single crystal, as if it forms the entire sundog, which isn't very enlightening.

  • @rozaepareza
    @rozaepareza 5 років тому +117

    For anyone interested in these sorts of things "atmospheric optics" is the keyword to google.

    • @Defeshh
      @Defeshh 5 років тому +2

      Lovely, thanks

    • @dielfonelletab8711
      @dielfonelletab8711 5 років тому +2

      There really needs to be a website or a subreddit where you can ask people what keywords you'd need to google to find something.

  • @kauhanen44
    @kauhanen44 5 років тому +84

    I love how he calls Brady "some guy" right to his face.

    • @blackflash9935
      @blackflash9935 5 років тому +13

      lare290 Well...that is the joke.

    • @kauhanen44
      @kauhanen44 5 років тому +3

      @@blackflash9935 I know, that's what I love about it.

    • @bengineer8
      @bengineer8 5 років тому

      time stamp?

    • @ro_yo_mi
      @ro_yo_mi 5 років тому +1

      Proof the Prof is a Baller!!

    • @nathangreene3
      @nathangreene3 5 років тому +2

      Also called him a lightweight.

  • @francoislacombe9071
    @francoislacombe9071 5 років тому +6

    There was an article in Sky and Telescope about such halo arcs. One interesting thing in that article was that such halos also exist on Mars, but they look quite different because they are formed by dry ice crystals, which have a very different structure from that of water ice crystals.

  • @paulamsden8420
    @paulamsden8420 5 років тому +9

    "Some guy called Brady Haran"? Sounds like Dr. Merrifield isn't giving Brady the respect he deserves :D

  • @U014B
    @U014B 5 років тому +38

    "Halo Sim" sounds like a game where you date Master Chief.

  • @HermanVonPetri
    @HermanVonPetri 5 років тому +4

    These are such fascinating and ephemeral natural works of art.
    I would like to mention a slight niggle concerning the visual aids. The viewer is actually in the space in the center of the arc and the ice crystals make up the material in the arcs themselves.
    While individual crystals do shine light at a particular angle relative to the light source, the sheer number of randomly oriented crystals in the atmosphere means that the combined light is diffusely homogeneous. It's an illusion to think that there is some actual well defined projection that exists in any one place in the sky. There is not. You just can't see the light from all the crystals that aren't shining in your direction. And the light you see is just the light coming from crystals that happen to be in the right place so that their orientation makes the proper angle to refract the sun's light directly into your eyes.

  • @hernancoronel
    @hernancoronel 5 років тому +2

    At 3:40 I disagree with the animation. It should show several crystals randomly oriented with the light exiting in different directions forming a (possibly incomplete) rainbow. Thanks for the video and love the professor explanations. Keep up the excellent content!

  • @NGC-7635
    @NGC-7635 5 років тому +56

    ...but it could also be aliens. The aliens want you to THINK it’s just ice crystals, but they haven’t fooled me.
    *adjusts tin foil hat*

    • @Theraot
      @Theraot 5 років тому +3

      Plot twist: there are alients that want you to THINK it's just tin foil.

    • @spoonikle
      @spoonikle 5 років тому +1

      Alfonso J. Ramos - Exactly! the aliens want us to think tin foil hats don’t work!!

    • @oremooremo5075
      @oremooremo5075 5 років тому

      But Derek from Veritasium showed that wearing a tinfoil hat makes it easier to spy on you

    • @RWBHere
      @RWBHere 5 років тому +2

      It's a NASA lie! Tinfoil is FLAT!

    • @slappy8941
      @slappy8941 5 років тому

      @@RWBHere You're just crazy. Everyone knows tinfoil was invented by Sasquatch on Atlantis.

  • @TheyCallMeNewb
    @TheyCallMeNewb 5 років тому

    Spectacular work, arc hunter. The animated renderings were terrific!

    • @sixtysymbols
      @sixtysymbols  5 років тому

      Thanks. Pete did the animations.

    • @MarkTillotson
      @MarkTillotson 5 років тому

      Indeed - it'll be Snark hunting next I reckon!

  • @jeremiahbaker985
    @jeremiahbaker985 5 років тому +1

    I've been interested in these for a while, I watch for them. I notice from my location in the midwest they seem to occur less often than I often hear predicted. I suspect they are more prevalent in areas of Europe where they are studied with more rigor. This leads of course to the hypothesis that local weather patterns play a significant role in how often these phenomena can be seen.

  • @BrianBlock
    @BrianBlock 5 років тому

    Professor Merrifield is my favorite presenter on this channel. We all need teachers like him!

  • @macronencer
    @macronencer 5 років тому +1

    Brilliant! I remember the first time I was able to show my son a sundog, and I took his photo with it behind him and tried to explain what it was. I think Professor Merrifield would have done a better job, though. I love it that you can get software to help you identify what you've seen! That's fantastic.

  • @conanichigawa
    @conanichigawa 3 роки тому +2

    A year later:
    CGP Grey: "Hexagons are the bestagons!"

  • @ln5321
    @ln5321 5 років тому +15

    "Merry Christmas! I got you something!"
    "Oh, mate, you didn't have to do tha--"
    "I wrote you an essay!"
    "What? An essay on what?"
    "Snowflakes have six-fold symmetry and it was tripping me out."
    "All right, well I was just gonna give you this $5 gift card I won to a store I don't like, so we'll call it a wash."

  • @baluskisworld
    @baluskisworld 5 років тому +4

    Thank you for helping me to understand the true nature of the universe again and again. Another awesome video

  • @MyYTwatcher
    @MyYTwatcher 5 років тому

    Lucky Brady at the right time at the right spot, fantastic prof Merrifield and breathtaking beauty of the nature in one video. This was so awesome.

  • @Fingerblasterstudios
    @Fingerblasterstudios 5 років тому +3

    The two intersecting arcs kind of reminds me of the artifacts you get when doing a starfield skybox in a video game with just a cube of faces.
    EDIT: Specifically with mipmaps on.

  • @JustOneAsbesto
    @JustOneAsbesto 5 років тому

    The world (including youtube) needs more Mike Merrifield. Brady? Do it.

    • @TetonGemWorks
      @TetonGemWorks 5 років тому

      that's the reason for the comment section... What does it meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeennnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn??????????

  • @projektor4
    @projektor4 5 років тому +1

    I´m often keeping a look out on the sky to see what´s going on but the first time i noticed a Circumzenithal Arc was when i was looking down and saw it reflected on the surface of my garden pond.

  • @emilioherrera6345
    @emilioherrera6345 5 років тому +7

    6:30 "Haran arcs, I prefer to call them"

    • @JuiceExMachina
      @JuiceExMachina 5 років тому

      Discovered by the humble "Arc Hunter" (7:37)

  • @sapiensesciencecerveau2523
    @sapiensesciencecerveau2523 2 роки тому

    It is amazing to discover both an interesting optic application, but also that it ends up making those wonderful natural events.
    It makes them even more magic to contemplate!

  • @YitzJacob
    @YitzJacob 5 років тому

    Hey Brady :) (I came here from HI, I've only rarely seen your videos but after the discussion on HI, I was very curious to see your rainbow, never seen anything like it! Also, there are sooooo many interesting videos from your archives that UA-cam is suggesting, I guess you earned yourself a few subscriptions. !thanks!)

  • @Grinsekatze113
    @Grinsekatze113 5 років тому +77

    Pff and I thought we had rainbows figured out. Instead another rabit hole. Who needs sleep anyway xD

    • @EebstertheGreat
      @EebstertheGreat 5 років тому +3

      These higher order arcs are usually extremely faint or invisible, so it's not surprising they found new stuff in photos of rings formed by snowblowers.

    • @Triantalex
      @Triantalex 14 днів тому

      Humans.

  • @stuartstjohn1291
    @stuartstjohn1291 5 років тому +1

    I note that no mention is made of the order of the colours in the lower arc. In a normal rainbow the red goes on the outside of the bend and violet on the inside. This 'Haran Arc' has the colours reversed...

    • @potkettle
      @potkettle 5 років тому +2

      It's because in a rainbow, the light is reflected off the internal "rear" surface of the raindrop, so you see a mirror image of the colour spectrum. In these ice halos, there is refraction, but no reflection, so you see them the "correct" way round. In a double rainbow, there are two reflections inside the water droplet, so the order of colours is reversed back to regular. That's why in a double rainbow, the red bands are back-to-back.

  • @bambooloop9386
    @bambooloop9386 5 років тому

    A thing that always trips me up about the visualization at 3:39. The arc you see from the ground isn’t directly because the hexagon sweeps out an arc the way the graphic suggests (or rather a bunch of hexagons really close together at random orientations). It’s about you looking in different directions and hoping there’s a hexagon perfectly positioned to bend the light from the sun into your eyes. Remember that when you look at another part of the rainbow,you’re looking at entirely different snowflakes.

  • @iisjebsb26378
    @iisjebsb26378 5 років тому +30

    Can't wait to come in September, (providing I get the grades)

  • @Robertohamoso
    @Robertohamoso 5 років тому

    These videos are great, please do more of them. New discoveries make some videos look dated, gravitational waves is one that comes to mind. You've had 8k views in 3hrs so it's worth it.

  • @juniorballs6025
    @juniorballs6025 5 років тому +1

    Awesome as always. Excellence just doesn't get old, thanks very much!

  • @fahadmalik4797
    @fahadmalik4797 5 років тому +3

    Hey Brady! We need more videos!

  • @Esc0bar0ni
    @Esc0bar0ni 5 років тому

    I’m a simple man, I see new Sixty Symbols video with prof. Merrifield, I watch and hit like.

  • @Sirenhound
    @Sirenhound 5 років тому +4

    3:39 Isn't that backwards? The observer is fixed, you should move the hexagon.

    • @philp4684
      @philp4684 5 років тому +7

      @Orange Top The animation is somewhat misleading - It shows light from the sun being refracted through an ice crystal, then beamed out into an arc around the crystal, which the observer then sees. That's wrong.
      The reality is that the refracted beam leaving the ice crystal either directly enters the observer's eye, or it misses the observer's eye. The light appears as an arc to the observer because only an arc of crystals are in the right positions to refract the light towards the observer.
      So, a correct animation should show a whole bunch of crystals in an arc arrangement refracting light towards the observer. And maybe other crystals outside the arc refracting light in directions other than towards the observer.
      More briefly: The arc shouldn't be drawn *around* a single crystal; there should be crystals *on* the arc.

  • @chinookvalley
    @chinookvalley 5 років тому

    I've been seeing the strangest shaped rainbows here in southern Colorado. Some zig-zag, others bow upwards, others seem to be a straight line that goes out into infinity, multiple overlaid bows, 2-tone bows, ... with all the imposed particulates being added into our atmosphere on a daily basis (solar radiation management) I'm surprised we still have any blue to be seen, or white clouds left at all.

  • @lobo80085
    @lobo80085 4 роки тому +1

    Why does the light only show in that specific spot in the sky?
    At 3:40 why does the light only appear at the end of the beam, rather than showing the entire beam of light?

  • @beskamir5977
    @beskamir5977 5 років тому

    It's rather incredible how old scientists were able to predict stuff with rather impressive accuracy despite not being able to know for certain. Stuff like Kepler basically predicting molecules, a bunch of early psychologists/neuroscientists pretty accurately predicting various neurological systems/pathways that we're just now beginning to understand, etc.

  • @ThomasGodart
    @ThomasGodart 5 років тому

    OMG it's way more complicated than I thought. Thanks for the full explanation

  • @N.I.R.A.T.I.A.S.
    @N.I.R.A.T.I.A.S. 5 років тому

    I wish I'd had just one science teacher as good as Professor Merrifield when I'd been at school.

  • @johnmurrell3175
    @johnmurrell3175 4 роки тому

    A lot of the rare arcs were identified by the early polar explorers hence one of them is called the Parry Arc. The cold clear conditions in Antarctica result in fairly frequent displays of the common and rare arcs.

  • @seanehle8323
    @seanehle8323 5 років тому

    I've seen the "Sun Dogs" before, but never the circle connecting them, nor the star of arcs intersecting vertical of the sun. That's so cool. Gosh, there's so much cool stuff in that pic. Do a follow-up episode on all the "extra" arcs in the pic, please!!!

  • @davidonfim2381
    @davidonfim2381 5 років тому +2

    I may have missed this, but why do the crystals tend to align themselves? I can't think of any mechanism that would do this, and I would think that even the slightest air current would completely randomize the directions of the crystals

    • @AstroMikeMerri
      @AstroMikeMerri 5 років тому +5

      David Enrique you do need fairly still conditions in the cloud so as not to randomise the orientations, but if so they then settle in the horizontal arrangements because it is the most stable, much like a leaf dies when falling from a tree.

    • @davidonfim2381
      @davidonfim2381 5 років тому +5

      @@AstroMikeMerri Oooohhh, it's them falling through the air that does it! That makes total sense now. Thanks!

  • @mrlegoboy413
    @mrlegoboy413 5 років тому

    thank you for sharing halosim mister professor!

  • @althaz
    @althaz 5 років тому

    I saw the tweet and was like "I hope this turns into a video". Nice.

  • @RBuckminsterFuller
    @RBuckminsterFuller 5 років тому

    Awesome. If I ever see one I'll definitely think of it as a Haran arc.

  • @tomasthemas
    @tomasthemas 5 років тому +1

    Ok, this is super cool, BUT, I was under the impression that the rainbow shape emanated directly from the crystals themselves... they had to be in that spacial location relative to you. The animation makes it appear that the crystals are essentially a point-source, and that the rainbow is another reflection that bounces the array of colors to your eyes. Can someone please help me understand this?

  • @waldorf2007
    @waldorf2007 5 років тому

    Best Weatherman eva!

  • @chaoslab
    @chaoslab 5 років тому +1

    Thank you so much professor Mike. You are awesome.

  • @iwillfreezeyou
    @iwillfreezeyou 5 років тому +7

    Video has been up for 2 min and you can already see the likes

  • @RWBHere
    @RWBHere 5 років тому

    Fascinating, and explained so clearly too. Thanks Brady.🙂

  • @fatemeh2560
    @fatemeh2560 3 роки тому

    This was wonderful, very well explained, thank you

  • @z-beeblebrox
    @z-beeblebrox 5 років тому +2

    1:03 did Terry Gilliam secretly animate this?

  • @janice8500
    @janice8500 5 років тому

    And that is exactly why I love this channel!!!

  • @gowri1991
    @gowri1991 5 років тому

    My man Mike is finally back

  • @ThePrimevalVoid
    @ThePrimevalVoid 5 років тому

    Amazing video, as always.
    Also, Brady, what's up with your microphone?

  • @Terminalss
    @Terminalss 5 років тому +1

    I've seen clouds that dont form rainbow like arcs rather the cloud itself is lit up in rainbow colours like an oil spill. No idea how that happens

    • @potkettle
      @potkettle 5 років тому

      That's iridescence, and is caused in a very similar way to oil on water. The droplets cause a mass diffraction grating, so you get the various wavelengths of light going in and out of phase with each other as the angle to the sun changes.

  • @topofsm
    @topofsm 5 років тому

    I can't nitpick the optics, but ice doesn't have a hexagonal structure just because it's the most efficient way to pack molecules. If that were true, then solid ice would be denser than liquid water, which isn't the case. Ice has hexagonal structure due to the nature of hydrogen bonding, which will cause H20 molecules to orient relative to each other in a relatively hexagonal pattern.

  • @3snoW_
    @3snoW_ 5 років тому

    Never knew about Haran arcs ! Nice!

  • @abhavishwakarma5035
    @abhavishwakarma5035 5 років тому +2

    This always amazes me, how subtle changes in a microscopic scale can cause such a beautiful scene.

  • @jackielinde7568
    @jackielinde7568 5 років тому +1

    Are the different (or more exotic) crystalline shapes of ice linked with the different types of water ice?

    • @jb76489
      @jb76489 5 років тому

      Not naturally, you need very high pressures for those

  • @collinscody57
    @collinscody57 2 роки тому

    Must be nice to have a team of professors to awnser your random questions

  • @TheAmethyz
    @TheAmethyz 5 років тому

    few weeks ago in Finland winter time we saw straight rainbow (rainstick???) and it had also bright normal sun light looking orb so almost like light orb that shoots rainbow laser. it was around 45 degrees in the sky if i remember correctly.

  • @litigioussociety4249
    @litigioussociety4249 5 років тому

    I know sun dogs, solar halos, and lunar halos are caused by similar effects, but I'm curious as to what the difference is that causes a full ring versus a couple arcs or sun dogs?

  • @benoitlafleur1364
    @benoitlafleur1364 5 років тому

    Two weeks ago, I was amazed by strange rainbows on both sides of the sun at sunset. Now, I undesstand what these "sun dogs" (parhelion) are made of. Nice.

  • @mokovec
    @mokovec 5 років тому

    Why do the two arcs appear to touch? Seems very peculiar how everything aligns so well also on the pic of the day.

    • @MarkTillotson
      @MarkTillotson 5 років тому

      Its the same geometry of 90% face angles if you think about it, just the crystal's flipped over.

  • @ysakhno
    @ysakhno 5 років тому +2

    How come a professional camera operator (!) shoots vertical video on his bloody iPhone?

    • @sixtysymbols
      @sixtysymbols  5 років тому

      Was shooting it for social media. The UA-cam video was an afterthought. And I actually like how it integrates. In the modern video grammar it almost feels like “and here’s a moment from the real world”. I think the days of that mattering are over TBH.

  • @daniyaradashev1813
    @daniyaradashev1813 5 років тому

    Long live prefessor Merrifield!

  • @savvapouroullis7927
    @savvapouroullis7927 5 років тому

    a sixty symbols video? Made my month :D

  • @Defeshh
    @Defeshh 5 років тому

    Great animations!

  • @cbrackin531
    @cbrackin531 5 років тому

    hey I have a random video idea. Did we discover math or invent in. Of course we invented the symbols we use( numbers/ letters), but the relationships between the ideas behind the symbols did we discovered?

  • @michaelsheffield6852
    @michaelsheffield6852 5 років тому

    Fascinating

  • @sniffy6999999
    @sniffy6999999 5 років тому +10

    That was explained really well.
    and I still don't understand it.

  • @brokentombot
    @brokentombot 3 роки тому

    Human: Wow! Angels are in the sky sending us a sign from Jeebus!
    Physicist: Hold me pint, let me get my powerpoint slide out and I'll explain...

  • @mistag3860
    @mistag3860 5 місяців тому

    I saw a moonbow once - quite beautiful and rare - whats that all about then?

  • @datajunkie190
    @datajunkie190 5 років тому

    Remarkable! Thank you.

  • @DC-zi6se
    @DC-zi6se 5 років тому

    What's around Kepler's neck in the painting.

  • @Pedozzi
    @Pedozzi 4 роки тому

    Why don't you make a video on moon halos?

  • @DANGJOS
    @DANGJOS 5 років тому

    Wow that was fascinating!!!

  • @Vonwell_
    @Vonwell_ 5 років тому +4

    Double rainbow all the way across the sky!

    • @slappy8941
      @slappy8941 5 років тому

      I saw a quintuple rainbow in 2007 when the sun was setting and the light passed under a rain cloud.

  • @josephtixier2404
    @josephtixier2404 5 років тому

    Haran Arcs "I don't think you get to call them after you" Professor Mike Merrifield (2019)... Have you looked at the internet lately?

  • @davidwilkie9551
    @davidwilkie9551 5 років тому

    Wow! type pictures, ..and does all this type of explanation tie into X-ray crystallography too, (which I also find difficult, ..to relate the crystal object geometry to the projected interference objectives that is actually to do with entanglement and QM-Time projection, and sync-condensation drawing, Principle of e-Pi-i perspective resonances).

    • @MarkTillotson
      @MarkTillotson 5 років тому

      Alas, not quite, X-ray diffraction patterns are different from these refraction effects, but all patterns expose the symmetries of the object generating them. Diffraction effects act rather like reflections from layers of atoms,
      but only when the wavelength is in precise relation to the spacing of the layers. The ice crystal faces are causing
      the refraction effects, and the faces are also layers of atoms, but only some kinds of layer become faces.
      X-ray diffraction happens with any layers of atoms inside the crystal (an infinity of such layers exists).

  • @altejoh
    @altejoh 5 років тому +1

    I need a new daytime TV show called "Arc Hunter".

  • @jordandeck2477
    @jordandeck2477 5 років тому

    15/10 video. Wow!

  • @andrescardenas4732
    @andrescardenas4732 5 років тому

    which was the name of the software?

    • @AstroMikeMerri
      @AstroMikeMerri 5 років тому

      The package I was playing with is called halosim3.

  • @bernhardmelitamann6512
    @bernhardmelitamann6512 5 років тому

    the funny thing is that rainbows are not two dimensional. When you move closer you still see the rainbow and when you sit down you see it and when you jump you still see it. This means the rainbow is a 3d dimensional volume effect.

  • @cgaccount3669
    @cgaccount3669 5 років тому

    Seems like a square and cube would be just as efficient for packing things as a hex. And less complex.

  • @GLITCH_-.-
    @GLITCH_-.- 5 років тому

    Wait... that picture of the snowflake is made with a scanning electron microscope. How do you coat something that's basically water with a layer of something conductive? Or is the ice conductive enough? Doesn't it melt?

    • @JennWanderer
      @JennWanderer 5 років тому

      They dip it in liquid nitrogen then observe it in a vacuum or argon atmosphere chamber, if I recall.

    • @dhvsheabdh
      @dhvsheabdh 5 років тому

      Things don't necessarily have to be coated in metal for the SEM to take images.

    • @GLITCH_-.-
      @GLITCH_-.- 5 років тому

      Then how did they do this?

    • @dhvsheabdh
      @dhvsheabdh 5 років тому

      @@GLITCH_-.- Kept it cold in the vaccum of the SEM and just whacked it in? I've no idea. I've measured semiconductor chips that don't need gold coating to observe anything (it would ruin the nano-optical devices on them).

    • @GLITCH_-.-
      @GLITCH_-.- 5 років тому

      @@dhvsheabdh are you saying they just yeeted it in there and then whacked it with electrons?

  • @pierregabory8772
    @pierregabory8772 5 років тому +5

    DOUBLE RAINBOW OH MY GOD

  • @xekolaxo
    @xekolaxo 5 років тому

    Wait, aren't most rainbows supralateral, not circumzenithal? Or have I understood something wrong?

  • @amirmograbi
    @amirmograbi 5 років тому

    Hexagonal crystals all aligned similarly to how tree leaves align on the ground? I lost you there, leaves align flat on the ground because that's the most stable way for them to fall on the flat ground. How is that relevant to the hexagonal crystals in a cloud with no ground to fall on ? if they are floating around, my intuition would be they'll have a random alignment.

    • @AstroMikeMerri
      @AstroMikeMerri 5 років тому

      As they fall to the ground - sorry if unclear.

    • @pmcpartlan
      @pmcpartlan 5 років тому

      Sorry, I thought that was clear - he's talking about leaves falling from trees and kind of fluttering back and forth - they kind of zigzag with the flat bit mostly parallel to the ground because of the air resistance.

  • @Gaspode_
    @Gaspode_ 5 років тому

    If "the Haran Arc" doesn't take off you could always use "the Parker Sphere"

  • @ericpuse5151
    @ericpuse5151 5 років тому

    Love the Simpsons/Stephen Hawking reference Brady

  • @GeordieMilne
    @GeordieMilne 5 років тому

    If i stare closely at a shiny single spec of sand or rock I start to see a hexagon snowflake looking shape with shapes within, why is that?

  • @bob2nifty
    @bob2nifty 5 років тому

    nice vid thanks

  • @zhubajie6940
    @zhubajie6940 5 років тому

    Is it a similar phenomenon with noctilucent clouds?

    • @potkettle
      @potkettle 5 років тому

      Noctilucent clouds are formed by ice crystals, but there's no refraction component (hence why they're white). They're spectacular just because of how high up they are.

  • @shivajoshi9068
    @shivajoshi9068 5 років тому +1

    Hi! Can u make a vid on superconductor applications…

    • @ChiefVS
      @ChiefVS 5 років тому

      It's used in LHC :)

    • @shivajoshi9068
      @shivajoshi9068 5 років тому

      @@ChiefVS m8 can u please explain what LHC Stands for...?:D

    • @simontay4851
      @simontay4851 5 років тому

      LHC= Large Hadron Collider.

  • @Hogibaer
    @Hogibaer 5 років тому +1

    ...constantly checking if I am on "normal" speed :-)

  • @user-kp5ps7gj8b
    @user-kp5ps7gj8b 5 років тому

    WOW!

  • @Camboo10
    @Camboo10 5 років тому

    To think that double rainbows used to impress the internet. Now look how many rainbows we have!

  • @illustriouschin
    @illustriouschin 5 років тому

    Are these arcs not spherical?