@@LucasFleming-lq2ry I also found it super funny how they gave branded hard restrictions then weeks later printing tear that had no restrictions at all.
@@johnwickonspeed7701My headcanon is Konami intended to give Tear fusion restrictions but they ran out of text space while optimizing their PSCT as much as possible
He could've been playing around Gamma which is fair, the real crime is not adding book of moon from prosperity to book the reinoheart and shut down a potential sulliek and then go Unicorn full combo, pilot is absolute garbage.
@@mr.borimitsu2205 Nah, he was clearly trying to hit a Tear effect with Shifter. I guess is more likely to open a name instead of Talents but the risks are too high, he got hard punished.
getting tear to waste something like mill 5 or even eight on a shifter response can be really valuable. Not saying it was correct, but playing against a deck like tear, taking a risk and going for the higher value play is tempting.
Game 4 tear could have won if they left the sheiren in gy kash had no way to interact with field , ns shuffler, shuffle gy sheiren, field pop ariseheart, then follow up with scream plus instant fusion, any other monster as a draw also worked to beat the board
Potentially. While they did not know about imperm, it is possible that the Kash player would have chained it to mudora, at which point the tear player has no way to use the field spell. You would have to summon mudora before activating the field spell because they can just banish the 3 cards in gy with birth after the field spell resolves
Wow that was super super close. Kashtira was basically created to be THE Tear counter, but Tear still managed to pull through. Crazy set. It's a miracle they survived the shifter game 5.
@@andrejv.2834tear is the best deck of all time and it’s not close. Pretty sure lithium has a tear vs snake eye match where snake eye got 3-0d despite going first in every game lmao.
@@zenmaines355 so one match with specifically the destruction variant proves it? There's also a cbc match where tear wins 3-2 after snake eye misplayed btw, so by that logic that proves the synchro variant of snake eye is better? Also even if tear were to win every h2h, that doesn't make them the better deck, it only means they have a favourable matchup When it comes to actual results, snake eye has a higher win percentage and higher average representation, so not much to argue about there
@@KamenFD Not that bad. Tear at full power was teh dominate force when Full Power Kash was out at YCS Lyon. It was the last legal event for Tear. Kash just wasn't good enough to mitigate Tear.
@@bdc129 That is an insane statement if you think that. People were play-testing Kash for months before the deck fully released at full power and the deck is WAY less complicated to play than Tear was. It already had a lot of data from the OCG to go off of as well. The Zone Lock combo also wasn't THAT common. It was still rare. You act like every Kash game was exclusively going for that combo. It didn't. It was the best case scenario with no interruption and a perfect hand on top. Just because you saw it once with Dominic Couch in that one Team event doesn't mean it was happening every game.
@@orga7777 bro Shangri-Ira+Diablosis it's a pretty regular combo back then, the only downside is that it loses so hard to Nib so people often went for Ariseheart control instead. Against Tear you just simply banish their Kitt and lock 3 zones is already enough
They would still be under shifter. At best they would have sulliek with a havnis. Kash woums still have birth for follow up. Their only kit is gone, unicorn would rip from extre deck on a new chain if kit was used too.
yeah, that was a misplay. I guess historically Kashtira didn't really play book specificaly for the Tear matchup. Probably just wasn't aware of just how limited tear was at that point with no way to activate herald and Sulliek/cryme needing a name. So they wanted a backup in case Unicorn gets negated, because they had literally nothing else.
should of just played game 2 with tear. Your losing advantage from the shifter, but your losing regardless, so might as well instant fusion into spoly and try and grsp something.
Everyone said kash should've add book of moon for g5 but wouldn't they just ended with a two mat shangri-ira and two imperm as well? Or were they able to go to ariseheart? Sorry im not familiar with Kash
Two major misplays Kashtira player made: Not shiftering in DP to avoid Talents Prosperity > Book of Moon > use on Tear to disable trap. Field Spell search unicorn > Unicorn > search Kashtiratheosis > use Theosis to summon Fenrir from deck > Fenrir search Riseheart > xyz summon Shangri > Activate Riseheart to special summon itself > use effect to banish top 3 of Tears cards from deck face down > shangri activates effect to seal a zone > field spell pops the trap > summon Ariseheart since you fufilled its summoning condition Congrats Tears lose to Macro Cosmos + disruption + 2 backrow
@@charlesfort6602 Both sides were still under the effect of Dimension Shifter anyways so Suliek would have been banished if the Kash player did full combo like he could have. Suliek only gets a search if it hits the grave.
Tear has no ignition effects that let them play from anywhere other than hand or field. They use resources out of the GY to fusion, but fusions never come from the GY without being initiated from a mill or foolish that was in hand or field. This just means they if they start their turn with like 1 card in hand, and you have 1 negate, they will lose.
Question about the tournament format: if two decks meet for a second time in the playoffs, should the deck that lost the dice roll the first time automatically win the dice roll the second time? Seems a bit more fair this way instead of letting one deck go first twice. For example, we have a rematch coming up between Runick Spright and Tear. Spright won the dice roll the first time. Should Tear get to go first in the rematch?
The tournament format never considered that. I guess they just play the rock paper scissors on edopro for every match. If you don't know the tournament system you will be surprised when the finals might be played in two matches instead of one 😂. Anyway, this is the best system we have, if you watched the first editions this has improved a lot. Also, luck is part of the game, that's how it is right?
For the metalfoes vs exodia match. I think the only really good counters that metalfoes has are infinity, totem bird, emptiness and the clutch psi blocker (a prohibition a like monster). Unicorn and alkahest can remove sangan from the field without sending it to gy but last will can summon infinite monsters so... Who knows 🤔. That match will be decided in game 5 anyway as usual for exodia 😂.
Please dont forget the next poll 😅. Anyway, about this match, im not really sure about the cards shuffled by talents for both players i mean, but if you shuffle back a card and the opponent draws it again well... Luck is factor in this game like it or not 😂 ah yes that's how it is.
Kash vs their greatest ever nemesis, targeted negation on a single monster lol Also should've gone prospy for 6 in g1, as book is the only card that beats sulliek and wins the game, which that hand had no other way of beatingt
tbh the first time was a hard throw from tear (might be to create more drama since Tear might win the whole thing easily). You can check their game.. I recall Runick spright had fountain and tear player didn't heartbeat it
@@andrejv.2834 it was a high-risk high-reward play. Wanted him to waste a name but got hard punished by talents. Also considering his hand it was a very bad call. Skill issue
@@yazanabbadi4247 the book play is more important here, taking book with prospy outs every potential disruption tear had, but they took riseheart despite having full combo because???
@@andrejv.2834 okay I understand now. Yeah that was a fatal mistake idk.. either opp doesn't know how tear works or they're completely throwing Kash out of tournament
The kash pilot was the mvp in that one, playing into talents for no reason and not getting book to turn off a potential sulleik/cryme in a hand that had the one card combo that can't be interrupted as orange light doesn't work under shifter
@@andrejv.2834 stop the cap. You would have been on the same "the pilot threw away" if he used shifter in dp and getting gamma. Just imagine, when they play they dont know the hands, just the lists. Its just risiking shifter against gamma giving opp 2 bodies to work with or risiking shifter on a mill effect for potenial ttt handrip... same odds of happening, more or less same value. So tell me, why is it the pilot throw on respecting 33,3% gamma in hand instead of respecting 33,3% TTT. Afterwards with handknowledge its easy to say, oh he should have played around ttt, duh. But while playing? Hell nah. Same risks, same value, just a gamble which out is in hand.
@@ExoflareKng so what about the much bigger misplay of not grabbing book when they already had combo and when we all know kash can't play through targeted negation without hard drawing their spells? Book beat both sulliek and cryme there but they decided to go for riseheart because?
@@andrejv.2834 with the talents, there is like 2 arguments you could make, they were playing around gamma as tear had gamma at 3 in side and they wanted to waste the tear players resources. But on the other hand, the kash player say talents in g3, so they probably shouldn't of played around gamma here. The talents play really didn't matter, kash player ended up drawing prosperity, but they also would of had prosperity for the turn after which may of mattered. With the book play, yeah the kash player should of taken it. The only way i could try and argue going for riseheart was better is that they knew they had forbidden droplet (and the tear player sided it in?), so they wanted to play around the droplet by having the extra extender and could go into shangri-ira. But then why would the kash player think the tear player kept them in when going 1st. So its still a misplay, but there is a line of reasoning why they chose riseheart over book, but which fails if you think past they fact that the tear player wouldn't keep droplet going 1st.
@shreesayajha also droplet doesn't work under shifter so there's no reason to play around it at all The only things that would've worked under shifter for tear are kelbek (useless against kash), sulliek and cryme, and book beats both of the traps here
As someone who aint familiar with both decks at all I was just watching this without any clue what Tears & Kash cards actually do 😂 If I remember correctly the TCG never had that matchup bc upon Kash release Tear got nuked already
Not quite. This is tears at full power BUT before tearlaments kashtira was released, and before the banlist that hit orange light to 1. If you look at YCS Lyon 2023, tears vsed full power kashtira (and won the whole thing, finals was a tear mirror) before the deck got nuked. So technically this match up wouldn't have happened, but arguably the deck was even stronger when tears kash came out, cause even tho you lost 2 ht's, you gained 3 which were also engine AND an extender
Wow. Tearlament clings onto the tournament by the skin of their teeth. The odds on favorite nearly, nearly got taken down. Next game, they go up against a far weaker deck in Runick Spright. Yes, they lost to them before. But Tear's odds of losing to Runick Spright even having to win twice, are far lower than losing once to the deck literally designed to counter them. Next matchup is funny. 17 whopping years of difference. Even Choas couldn't overcome 17 years of powercreep vs a 2020 deck. Can the most broken deck pre-pre errata deck of all time pull it off?
Againts this Kash, i think the OCG version of tear with 6 miller and 4 shuffler is better than using bystial. Also this kash list is just intended to stop tear by using every staple that are anti tear card to stand a chance againt "not the best tear list".
This tear list was made to win the mirror since it was the only deck in the format. The tear side deck was also terrible against Kash with only talents and gamma being decent due to that
Tear with more shuffler on main deck and bystial on side deck is better than this list i think Cause shuffler is also good on mirror with good timing on activation
Not to mention in tear mirror match, you could casually mill 20 card if both player hit 2 of shuffler and that's a huge chance for the shuffler to be mill. Tear with more shuffler and miller still a better list than main decking bystial
Correct me If i'm wrong, in G2 I would play: Instant+droplet = summon kit and shutbdown shangrira; then Kit eff > Imperm target Kit > super poly in chain: kit + arise = dragostapelia > kit resolve
I think you would have to instant for kit, then use super poly. At that point, you should be resolving kit search and mill 5 while removing arise which should just win
@@parthobhattacharya2165 they were under shifter as well though so kitt would of been banished. It only would of worked if instant fusion didnt destroy during ep.
Literally sitting in the lower bracket playing against the deck that beat them previously... Tear was btw barely able to keep their tier 0 status during their prime. Its the best deck of all time, but not by a lot.
@@Jaddasthey didn't keep their tier 0 status, average representation was 61.4% and they were tier 0 3/7 times Snake eye has higher average representation for reference
Kashtira lost g5 because the pilot is garbage, they didn't use shifter in draw phase, which is ok in certain cases, he could have been trying to play around Gamma which is understandable, what is absolutely not understandable, is why in the world when he had 2 imperm, prosp and planet, he adds fucking riseheart to hand when he could've just added book of moon, book the reinoheart and go for full combo without being interrupted by sulliek.
Tiaraments strongest They really decided to lose to spright just so they can run the gauntlet against all the decks after it that are supposedly "stronger" lmao
the irony is that exodia wants to battle tears because the deck has fewer hand traps than kash. herald is their greatest threat turn 1 which exodia depends on to win. kash, however, has imperm, shifter, droll, and ash. also spellbooks, which pushed exodia into the losers bracket i guarantee would be harder for the deck to win against. sprights i presume would also be difficult for exodia if it is in the final bracket.
@@chaosprime1629 I mean, tear with millers could mill 2 exodia pieces. I think roughly, with the 10 card mills of agido and kelbek, its a 38% chance to mill 2 pieces
@@mauer1 I don't know what you're talking about xd but in the previous edition finals were on January 1st and challenger appears continued on January, whatever, we cannot demand deadlines or something like that. Lithium can do it at his own pace.
I hate this modern sack every hand traps in the game or lose decks but I never rooted so hard for tear I hate Kash and tear is like shaddolls on crack Jesus Christ I hate Yu-Gi-Oh after mr3 ended but can someone tell me is it possible to mix tear with shaddolls? I mean milling to the grave seems to benefit shaddolls and tear is so powerful but imagine Winda right next to tear fusions
I mean, you have been the "MR3 Shaddoll is the best deck ever" and "Winda is invincible" for years, you SHOULD know all the ins and outs of Shaddoll synergies. Irony aside, and answering your question, yes, Tear works well with Shaddoll, to the point Winda was considered as part of the endboard for the initial release of Tear in POTE. But when Danger Tearlament was discovered 2 or 3 weeks after the release of POTE, people moved on from including Winda on the Extra Decks because people realized it wasn't the absolute best the deck could perform. Then after DABL and specially MAMA, Ishizu Tear became the definitive version. Also, we all know you love MR3 and DUEA format, and hate everything after MR4. Why throw so much negativity almost every single video on the CBC? Besides the previous irony, I am gonna try to be positive and maybe you could take this opportunity of the Tear and Shaddoll synergy to really learn how Modern Yugioh operates. Beacuse the game is still super interactive, and you could learn to build your beloved Shaddolls in a much better way than to run it exclusively like it was in 2014 (for example, combining them with what's left from the Tear engine after the banlists that have kneecapped the deck).... maybe that's why you hate Ash so much.
@sadrobot5501 the game is terrible 1 card into a whole board and generic negate everything hand traps there is no interaction my guy the game is terrible after mr3 that's just known facts
@sadrobot5501 ash is a generic negate with no draw backs it's unhealthy for the game anything that can negate or board wipe on your opponents turn is scummy
@sadrobot5501 and I clearly asked the question because idk how tear works I know how shaddoll works but I didn't if there was a reason it wouldn't work ie like lightsworns mill but you wouldn't want them in a Burning abyss deck
![Was Blue Girl About To Defeat Soulburner? [Blue Girl's First Battle]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wFA30y0XT3Q/mqdefault.jpg)
~~~~~🛡🛡🛡SPOILER GUARDS 🛡🛡🛡~~~~~
CANNOT BE DESTROYED BY BATTLE OR CARD EFFECTS
But you can be banished
Banished face down
And can be targeted.. 😢
Watching those matches makes me scared of opening my fridge. There might be a Tear player hiding there just waiting to take my turn.
While insisting it’s fair and balanced and it’s really Ishizu/Superpoly/Baronne/Jace Beleren’s fault and that Tear are faultless.
It is actually fair and balanced. IF they were hard locked into only Tear instead of everything they can use.
Wait, u have a turn again a Tear player?
@@LucasFleming-lq2ry I also found it super funny how they gave branded hard restrictions then weeks later printing tear that had no restrictions at all.
@@johnwickonspeed7701My headcanon is Konami intended to give Tear fusion restrictions but they ran out of text space while optimizing their PSCT as much as possible
Have no idea why kash did not just shifter in draw phase g5 to play around talents
Probably thought they should get Tear to waste a starter. Just a wrong risk/reward assessment.
Correct always have to shifter in draw phase the punish with talents is to strong
He could've been playing around Gamma which is fair, the real crime is not adding book of moon from prosperity to book the reinoheart and shut down a potential sulliek and then go Unicorn full combo, pilot is absolute garbage.
@@mr.borimitsu2205 Nah, he was clearly trying to hit a Tear effect with Shifter. I guess is more likely to open a name instead of Talents but the risks are too high, he got hard punished.
getting tear to waste something like mill 5 or even eight on a shifter response can be really valuable. Not saying it was correct, but playing against a deck like tear, taking a risk and going for the higher value play is tempting.
Game 4 tear could have won if they left the sheiren in gy kash had no way to interact with field , ns shuffler, shuffle gy sheiren, field pop ariseheart, then follow up with scream plus instant fusion, any other monster as a draw also worked to beat the board
Potentially. While they did not know about imperm, it is possible that the Kash player would have chained it to mudora, at which point the tear player has no way to use the field spell. You would have to summon mudora before activating the field spell because they can just banish the 3 cards in gy with birth after the field spell resolves
mudora banishes itself for cost also berth has to target 3 cards exactly so it couldn’t be used after the field spell is activated
@@FostedFlake I missed the mudora in grave, so I see what you mean; that was a mistake on my end.
Never caught one of these so early. Been REALLY looking forward to this one
Wow that was super super close. Kashtira was basically created to be THE Tear counter, but Tear still managed to pull through. Crazy set. It's a miracle they survived the shifter game 5.
Shows why Tear is the best deck ever made. It wins even vs a deck that is specifically made to counter your strategy. Insane.
Based on results it's snake eye in the tcg, based on opinions it can be argued for many decks
@@andrejv.2834tear is the best deck of all time and it’s not close. Pretty sure lithium has a tear vs snake eye match where snake eye got 3-0d despite going first in every game lmao.
@@andrejv.2834 not close at all
For now.
@@zenmaines355 so one match with specifically the destruction variant proves it?
There's also a cbc match where tear wins 3-2 after snake eye misplayed btw, so by that logic that proves the synchro variant of snake eye is better?
Also even if tear were to win every h2h, that doesn't make them the better deck, it only means they have a favourable matchup
When it comes to actual results, snake eye has a higher win percentage and higher average representation, so not much to argue about there
The deck designed to kill tear did not kill tear
Pilot had skill issue sadly
@@KamenFD Not that bad. Tear at full power was teh dominate force when Full Power Kash was out at YCS Lyon. It was the last legal event for Tear. Kash just wasn't good enough to mitigate Tear.
@@orga7777because Kash was a new deck at that time and people didn't know how to pilot it perfectly, the zone lock combo really takes some skill
@@bdc129 That is an insane statement if you think that. People were play-testing Kash for months before the deck fully released at full power and the deck is WAY less complicated to play than Tear was. It already had a lot of data from the OCG to go off of as well. The Zone Lock combo also wasn't THAT common. It was still rare. You act like every Kash game was exclusively going for that combo. It didn't. It was the best case scenario with no interruption and a perfect hand on top. Just because you saw it once with Dominic Couch in that one Team event doesn't mean it was happening every game.
@@orga7777 bro Shangri-Ira+Diablosis it's a pretty regular combo back then, the only downside is that it loses so hard to Nib so people often went for Ariseheart control instead. Against Tear you just simply banish their Kitt and lock 3 zones is already enough
Game 2, I think tear probably should win by going instant fusion for kitkallos and then going super poly to fuse away ariseheart and kit
Or just... normal summon merli. So many ways to actually play the game
They would still be under shifter. At best they would have sulliek with a havnis. Kash woums still have birth for follow up.
Their only kit is gone, unicorn would rip from extre deck on a new chain if kit was used too.
Kash player had this in the bag if they just grabbed Book of Moon that 5th game, but they grabbed Rise-heart of some reason I didn't understand that
yeah, that was a misplay. I guess historically Kashtira didn't really play book specificaly for the Tear matchup. Probably just wasn't aware of just how limited tear was at that point with no way to activate herald and Sulliek/cryme needing a name. So they wanted a backup in case Unicorn gets negated, because they had literally nothing else.
Same with the suliek pop that was already in the imperm column. That game 5 was so anticlimactic, Kash should have ended the tear run right there.
tear player could have won 2 or 4 if they played better so it balances out
Even in game 1, prosperity banishing only 3 was extremely questionable, if he banished 6 he could have excavated a book of moon and won the game
@@icecream_unicorn5150 maybe maybe
The goat Tiaraments vs the fraud Midtira. Imagine losing to the deck you are designed to beat lmao
W
Not shotgunning shifter is beyond wild, tear has no endboard against shifter and yet he still played into talents.
i mean,g5 was played bad,it should have been a win for kash
@snide1574 But we're glad that it wasnt
To the people saying game 5 was played bad, I agree with you, but let's not forget why Tearlaments is in the losers bracket in the first place.
who is the criminal siding in droplet against kashtira going second? There is no way in hell it ever resolves
Lithium2300
Well it looks like it’s gonna be a rematch against what caused tear to be here in the first place.
should of just played game 2 with tear. Your losing advantage from the shifter, but your losing regardless, so might as well instant fusion into spoly and try and grsp something.
Kash threw that game 5 pretty hard no?
yes,it should win this mu correct play
Totally, Tear should be out of the cup
Con algunos desaciertos, pero de todos modos salió un tremendo duelo de ambas barajas.
Man I was hoping Kash would take this to knock out Tear.
Everyone said kash should've add book of moon for g5 but wouldn't they just ended with a two mat shangri-ira and two imperm as well? Or were they able to go to ariseheart? Sorry im not familiar with Kash
Two major misplays Kashtira player made:
Not shiftering in DP to avoid Talents
Prosperity > Book of Moon > use on Tear to disable trap.
Field Spell search unicorn > Unicorn > search Kashtiratheosis > use Theosis to summon Fenrir from deck > Fenrir search Riseheart > xyz summon Shangri > Activate Riseheart to special summon itself > use effect to banish top 3 of Tears cards from deck face down > shangri activates effect to seal a zone > field spell pops the trap > summon Ariseheart since you fufilled its summoning condition
Congrats Tears lose to Macro Cosmos + disruption + 2 backrow
@@Latias38 ahh okay, I forgot about fenrir, thanks
@@Latias38third missplay was destroyed suliek on turn 3, giving the tear player a starter, and it was already in the imperm column anyway.
@@charlesfort6602 Both sides were still under the effect of Dimension Shifter anyways so Suliek would have been banished if the Kash player did full combo like he could have. Suliek only gets a search if it hits the grave.
@@coolerfr9938 np, anytime
That final game was insane.
It was threw by the Kash player, it's the oposite of a good game
@charlesfort6602 u are raging all throughout these comments good lord. Get over it. Let people enjoy things u weirdo
What makes tear’s recovery 4? Lol
Tear has no ignition effects that let them play from anywhere other than hand or field. They use resources out of the GY to fusion, but fusions never come from the GY without being initiated from a mill or foolish that was in hand or field.
This just means they if they start their turn with like 1 card in hand, and you have 1 negate, they will lose.
Keeping super poly and droplet sided in against kash was a choice lol
Question about the tournament format: if two decks meet for a second time in the playoffs, should the deck that lost the dice roll the first time automatically win the dice roll the second time? Seems a bit more fair this way instead of letting one deck go first twice.
For example, we have a rematch coming up between Runick Spright and Tear. Spright won the dice roll the first time. Should Tear get to go first in the rematch?
The tournament format never considered that. I guess they just play the rock paper scissors on edopro for every match. If you don't know the tournament system you will be surprised when the finals might be played in two matches instead of one 😂. Anyway, this is the best system we have, if you watched the first editions this has improved a lot. Also, luck is part of the game, that's how it is right?
You love to see it. 🎉
if exodia does manage to win the older bracket then tears defeating kash is more favorable for it because fewer hand traps.
millers hitting exodia pieces:
For the metalfoes vs exodia match. I think the only really good counters that metalfoes has are infinity, totem bird, emptiness and the clutch psi blocker (a prohibition a like monster). Unicorn and alkahest can remove sangan from the field without sending it to gy but last will can summon infinite monsters so... Who knows 🤔. That match will be decided in game 5 anyway as usual for exodia 😂.
Please dont forget the next poll 😅. Anyway, about this match, im not really sure about the cards shuffled by talents for both players i mean, but if you shuffle back a card and the opponent draws it again well... Luck is factor in this game like it or not 😂 ah yes that's how it is.
Kash vs their greatest ever nemesis, targeted negation on a single monster lol
Also should've gone prospy for 6 in g1, as book is the only card that beats sulliek and wins the game, which that hand had no other way of beatingt
Yah kash format was okay because of that
I hope tear beats spright, but if spright beats tear twice in a row then it’s very deserved
tbh the first time was a hard throw from tear (might be to create more drama since Tear might win the whole thing easily). You can check their game.. I recall Runick spright had fountain and tear player didn't heartbeat it
@@yazanabbadi4247 was the g5 throw here done to create more drama too?
@@andrejv.2834 it was a high-risk high-reward play. Wanted him to waste a name but got hard punished by talents. Also considering his hand it was a very bad call. Skill issue
@@yazanabbadi4247 the book play is more important here, taking book with prospy outs every potential disruption tear had, but they took riseheart despite having full combo because???
@@andrejv.2834 okay I understand now. Yeah that was a fatal mistake idk.. either opp doesn't know how tear works or they're completely throwing Kash out of tournament
I will say, the kash player wasnt that good in this player, multiple missplay
I think the player failed the deck this time.
I've never been so happy to see Tear win.
THANK YOU
TIARAMENTS STRONGEST
Thank You Tiaraments Strongest
The kash player misplayed in multiple games. It really cost them in the end. I dont think a deck will ever be as disgusting as full power tear was.
When i saw the shifter in game 5 i got really worried, but thankfully Tear was able to recover.
Lets hope Tear beats Spright this time...
The kash pilot was the mvp in that one, playing into talents for no reason and not getting book to turn off a potential sulleik/cryme in a hand that had the one card combo that can't be interrupted as orange light doesn't work under shifter
@@andrejv.2834 stop the cap. You would have been on the same "the pilot threw away" if he used shifter in dp and getting gamma.
Just imagine, when they play they dont know the hands, just the lists. Its just risiking shifter against gamma giving opp 2 bodies to work with or risiking shifter on a mill effect for potenial ttt handrip... same odds of happening, more or less same value. So tell me, why is it the pilot throw on respecting 33,3% gamma in hand instead of respecting 33,3% TTT.
Afterwards with handknowledge its easy to say, oh he should have played around ttt, duh. But while playing? Hell nah. Same risks, same value, just a gamble which out is in hand.
@@ExoflareKng so what about the much bigger misplay of not grabbing book when they already had combo and when we all know kash can't play through targeted negation without hard drawing their spells?
Book beat both sulliek and cryme there but they decided to go for riseheart because?
@@andrejv.2834 with the talents, there is like 2 arguments you could make, they were playing around gamma as tear had gamma at 3 in side and they wanted to waste the tear players resources. But on the other hand, the kash player say talents in g3, so they probably shouldn't of played around gamma here. The talents play really didn't matter, kash player ended up drawing prosperity, but they also would of had prosperity for the turn after which may of mattered. With the book play, yeah the kash player should of taken it. The only way i could try and argue going for riseheart was better is that they knew they had forbidden droplet (and the tear player sided it in?), so they wanted to play around the droplet by having the extra extender and could go into shangri-ira. But then why would the kash player think the tear player kept them in when going 1st. So its still a misplay, but there is a line of reasoning why they chose riseheart over book, but which fails if you think past they fact that the tear player wouldn't keep droplet going 1st.
@shreesayajha also droplet doesn't work under shifter so there's no reason to play around it at all
The only things that would've worked under shifter for tear are kelbek (useless against kash), sulliek and cryme, and book beats both of the traps here
As someone who aint familiar with both decks at all I was just watching this without any clue what Tears & Kash cards actually do 😂
If I remember correctly the TCG never had that matchup bc upon Kash release Tear got nuked already
Not quite. This is tears at full power BUT before tearlaments kashtira was released, and before the banlist that hit orange light to 1.
If you look at YCS Lyon 2023, tears vsed full power kashtira (and won the whole thing, finals was a tear mirror) before the deck got nuked.
So technically this match up wouldn't have happened, but arguably the deck was even stronger when tears kash came out, cause even tho you lost 2 ht's, you gained 3 which were also engine AND an extender
Tear best deck babyy - Tiaraments strongest - even a deck designed to beat them was not able to do so!
nice - wish you all good mills in the new year!
Wow. Tearlament clings onto the tournament by the skin of their teeth. The odds on favorite nearly, nearly got taken down. Next game, they go up against a far weaker deck in Runick Spright. Yes, they lost to them before. But Tear's odds of losing to Runick Spright even having to win twice, are far lower than losing once to the deck literally designed to counter them.
Next matchup is funny. 17 whopping years of difference. Even Choas couldn't overcome 17 years of powercreep vs a 2020 deck. Can the most broken deck pre-pre errata deck of all time pull it off?
Thank you Lithium, no way Kash wins that! Tiaraments strongest!
Tough match for both of them
There have been too many matches this year that are between decks that were from the same , or similarly timed, formats :(
i was soo happy, tear won yayyy
The only matchup I honestly thought team might lose…
Pulled through though, Tear Best Deck 😴
This match is so evenly matches that there is no votes😭😭😭
Againts this Kash, i think the OCG version of tear with 6 miller and 4 shuffler is better than using bystial.
Also this kash list is just intended to stop tear by using every staple that are anti tear card to stand a chance againt "not the best tear list".
This tear list was made to win the mirror since it was the only deck in the format. The tear side deck was also terrible against Kash with only talents and gamma being decent due to that
Tear with more shuffler on main deck and bystial on side deck is better than this list i think
Cause shuffler is also good on mirror with good timing on activation
Not to mention in tear mirror match, you could casually mill 20 card if both player hit 2 of shuffler and that's a huge chance for the shuffler to be mill.
Tear with more shuffler and miller still a better list than main decking bystial
Ah yes the visasless visas lore decks
kash player did not do my deck justice at all 😪
Amazing match
Correct me If i'm wrong, in G2 I would play: Instant+droplet = summon kit and shutbdown shangrira; then Kit eff > Imperm target Kit > super poly in chain: kit + arise = dragostapelia > kit resolve
Sadly can't droplet under macro (arise) cuz it sends to GY for cost, an action you cannot perform
I think you would have to instant for kit, then use super poly. At that point, you should be resolving kit search and mill 5 while removing arise which should just win
@@parthobhattacharya2165 they were under shifter as well though so kitt would of been banished. It only would of worked if instant fusion didnt destroy during ep.
As of right now there it not a single deck which standa a chance against Ishizu Tear ... best deck ever hands down 🔥
Literally sitting in the lower bracket playing against the deck that beat them previously...
Tear was btw barely able to keep their tier 0 status during their prime. Its the best deck of all time, but not by a lot.
@Jaddas he literally missplayed it vs Runick Spright prolly purposely just for Tear to lose lol
There is no way that Tear loses a BO5 my guy
@@Jaddasthey didn't keep their tier 0 status, average representation was 61.4% and they were tier 0 3/7 times
Snake eye has higher average representation for reference
If kadh gets book in g5 instead of a riseheart which their one card combo they opened grabs anyway they win btw
Kashtira lost g5 because the pilot is garbage, they didn't use shifter in draw phase, which is ok in certain cases, he could have been trying to play around Gamma which is understandable, what is absolutely not understandable, is why in the world when he had 2 imperm, prosp and planet, he adds fucking riseheart to hand when he could've just added book of moon, book the reinoheart and go for full combo without being interrupted by sulliek.
RIP bozo we were never losing to shifter
Tiaraments strongest!
How predictable of a turnout.
Tiaraments strongest
They really decided to lose to spright just so they can run the gauntlet against all the decks after it that are supposedly "stronger" lmao
the irony is that exodia wants to battle tears because the deck has fewer hand traps than kash. herald is their greatest threat turn 1 which exodia depends on to win. kash, however, has imperm, shifter, droll, and ash. also spellbooks, which pushed exodia into the losers bracket i guarantee would be harder for the deck to win against. sprights i presume would also be difficult for exodia if it is in the final bracket.
@@chaosprime1629 I mean, tear with millers could mill 2 exodia pieces. I think roughly, with the 10 card mills of agido and kelbek, its a 38% chance to mill 2 pieces
@shreesayajha also tearlaments kashtira has a mill effect and can act like a hand trap.
@@chaosprime1629 they are not playing tear kash, its pre phhy
Clutch match
Which simulator is this?
edopro
RUN THIS BACK WITH A BETTER KASH PLAYER. HE WAS DOOKIE.
The next ones gonna be a flashback
Now it's time to see if the first match of that matchup can be repeated
(Let's be real, probably not)
Tear>Kash
In which Tear Zero bodies a mill slop deck.
Nao assisti ainda mas acho que pela logica e lore, kash ganha pois bane e tear depende de gy
Eu tava errado
@@JarbasJack mesmo quando a 2° leva de kashtira tinha sido lançada, Tear ainda assim ganhou o ycs que ela tava valendo. Reinou do inicio ao fim
@@whendelgabriel6772 sim, nao atoa que foi tier 0
First !
Wait, damn you weren't able to close this ban list cup off within the year.
The finals will be on January 1st, what's the problem? Man, complaing is free and people love free things right? 😂😂😂
@sejotejerina3732 more like it the last one didn't went the full year 8 think
@@mauer1 I don't know what you're talking about xd but in the previous edition finals were on January 1st and challenger appears continued on January, whatever, we cannot demand deadlines or something like that. Lithium can do it at his own pace.
@@sejotejerina3732 The original comment sounds more like shock than complaining.
I hate this modern sack every hand traps in the game or lose decks but I never rooted so hard for tear I hate Kash and tear is like shaddolls on crack Jesus Christ I hate Yu-Gi-Oh after mr3 ended but can someone tell me is it possible to mix tear with shaddolls? I mean milling to the grave seems to benefit shaddolls and tear is so powerful but imagine Winda right next to tear fusions
I mean, you have been the "MR3 Shaddoll is the best deck ever" and "Winda is invincible" for years, you SHOULD know all the ins and outs of Shaddoll synergies. Irony aside, and answering your question, yes, Tear works well with Shaddoll, to the point Winda was considered as part of the endboard for the initial release of Tear in POTE. But when Danger Tearlament was discovered 2 or 3 weeks after the release of POTE, people moved on from including Winda on the Extra Decks because people realized it wasn't the absolute best the deck could perform. Then after DABL and specially MAMA, Ishizu Tear became the definitive version.
Also, we all know you love MR3 and DUEA format, and hate everything after MR4. Why throw so much negativity almost every single video on the CBC? Besides the previous irony, I am gonna try to be positive and maybe you could take this opportunity of the Tear and Shaddoll synergy to really learn how Modern Yugioh operates. Beacuse the game is still super interactive, and you could learn to build your beloved Shaddolls in a much better way than to run it exclusively like it was in 2014 (for example, combining them with what's left from the Tear engine after the banlists that have kneecapped the deck).... maybe that's why you hate Ash so much.
@sadrobot5501 ugh I've never said anything like that
@sadrobot5501 the game is terrible 1 card into a whole board and generic negate everything hand traps there is no interaction my guy the game is terrible after mr3 that's just known facts
@sadrobot5501 ash is a generic negate with no draw backs it's unhealthy for the game anything that can negate or board wipe on your opponents turn is scummy
@sadrobot5501 and I clearly asked the question because idk how tear works I know how shaddoll works but I didn't if there was a reason it wouldn't work ie like lightsworns mill but you wouldn't want them in a Burning abyss deck
LETS GO EXOOOODIA