Weird Secrets of the Eisenhower Matrix THEY Don't Want You to Know
Вставка
- Опубліковано 12 вер 2024
- Quite possibly the most important video on the Eisenhower Matrix you will watch all week.
If I’m important to you, buy me a Coke Zero here (it’s urgent): ko-fi.com/marc...
Link to the “matrix” speech (page 737, speech 209):
www.google.com...
Love the art, don't understand the video, but at least I know the Eisenhower Matrix now.
I'm here for the random topics and experimentation. Everything in the world doesn't have to revolve around the pursuit of money alone.
You have talent my friend, I subscribed after the last video and this too was unique and interesting.
Good research on the history. So strange how a throw away line can get rolled up into history as being a “method”. Ike is tough for me to learn about. Very interesting but difficult to find an objective book that isn’t slanted one way or another.
I didn’t expect this to trigger my depression so aggressively
Ha! Always a potential risk in clicking on something I’ve made.
Its an incredible realization! All that we so often take for granted, that basic concepts were understood, that a procedure was understood. Then if it fails we wonder if the method works at all without covering our basics.
I like that you bring up repetition. A fine tool to promote understanding in the first place.
So the thing I've never heard of isn't worth hearing of.. ok
Ha!
So glad I found your channel. Can't wait to see what you cook up next. I dig your flavor of the unexpected - whatever that means
Big fan of the previous video, I found that format to be utterly mesmerizing.
I already see several deviations from it in this one, so I would suggest scrutinizing the previous one as much as possible - which is a weird thing to say to the maker of the video - but you know how it goes. Lightnings in a bottle and stuff.
This is how you make sure you catch them consistently.
I think you're right -- this video is very different from the last one. Future ones will be very different from both. I'm not sure what it was about the last one that made it popular -- it's kind of a black box. My approach at the moment is to keep experimenting. At some point, I might get a better handle on what makes some of my videos more popular than others.
@@MarcusGallo9000 combination of music, everything that you see on the screen is proper pixelart, engaging, dense subject matter and the only voice is yours.
@@MarcusGallo9000 Math, and clear, colour focused style. I wanna hear about crazy problems of scale that make me go, "god dayum, that's a crazy idea, and proven perfectly", with nice pixelart. This was, like, 4 different things: a brief expose into eisenhower, a discussion of the eisenhower matrix, the untruth of that, and then the metajoke of this video not being important, but not really hammering home the significance.
@@MarcusGallo9000 Considering that some videos are fiction stories (Simping with the Necromancer), while others are nonfiction (the ancestors video), and some are surreal (both of the above) while others are more down to Earth (this one), I wouldn’t worry about trying to create a common thread. It’s enough that you’re discussing ideas in an interesting way and telling stories. The people who like your style will gather. The people who don’t can go pound sand.
@@howardroark3736 I like your style, Howard Roark 3736.
really good video again really interesting and a really cool art style keep up the great work man
Thank you, much appreciated!
I looked so hard to find you again, subbed love ya work pal
So great to hear -- thank you so much!
As someone who always has their phone with me and rarely responds to messages right away: It's not that the sender is unimportant, or that I am too important. The message is just not urgent.
Caught that, did you? I can’t really distinguish between urgent and important myself. Especially when the person never responds!
Your stories are so random!
Thats good!
I used a version of this to get a job in a group activity at a graduate assessment centre. The activity was we got a bio for each fictional character and had to decide who to save in an emergency. I modified the criteria to be ‘ethical’ and ‘practical’ reasons to save. We sorted the fictitious rescuees very fast and obviously finished the activity much faster than the assessor’s expected.
But on the point of Eisenhower, what a loser. I read Francis Yockey and am convinced Eisenhower was on the wrong side, then did nothing to actually stop the military industrial complex, then just complained about it. Ineffectual coward.
Very interesting -- good practical application of this decision-making approach!
I think there's a typo in your comment though -- clearly you meant to say "hero" instead of "loser."
@@MarcusGallo9000 Thanks. Maybe "loser" wasn't the most apt word. He was a winner in the sense that Patton was a winner. But I think Patton either had a bit more principle (hence his untimely end) or was more adept at noticing. Also, I think "wrong side" was not appropriate either, I'd revise to "greater of two evils".
@@MarcusGallo9000 Also, how about that time in 1932 Eisenhower sent in the bayonets and tanks on the WW1 Veterans, what a "hero" am I right?
just here for the thumbnail
lol yesss lean in on the funny you're funny :) I like the unabashedness of the writing
Last vid got mil, this one will get like 5m
Unlikely! But thank you for your kind words.
These videos keep getting weirder and weirder. And thats saying something!
Good video, obviously shorter and less info dense than the last one but that’s ok. I’d redo the thumbnail as soon as possible given the low CTR so far. Current is really hard to read and understand, wouldn’t have clicked if it wasn’t for your profile pic
Interesting, thanks for the feedback. Clickthrough rate is currently higher than the last video ever got, apparently?
(redacted)
Do you do your own voiceovers, or are you hiring someone? If the former, then hello stardusk - much prefer this channel to your other one.
My voice is my own, unique as a snowflake, and does not appear on other UA-camrs' channels. As far as I know.
@@MarcusGallo9000 I find that incredibly unlikely as the voice is very unique and is indistinguishable from the one in your videos. He does a lot of voice over work for other channels.
@@aiGeis Hmm, unsure of how I can prove that I’m myself?
Still, why would people take the joke seriously?
Naming this approach the Eisenhower Matrix was a marketing ploy by management types. Eisenhower was clearly an effective time manager, and you will be too by following his system, etc.
Are you ai. You don't sound human and your Chanel started in 2023. It's fine if it is. I'm just curious but great Channel.
There's no AI at all in this video. In my first videos I used AI art, but I've gone away from that to do my own pixel art, because AI art rubs people the wrong way. I do all the rest (writing, voice, music, etc.) myself. Not sure what it implies if I don't sound human.
Last vid got mil, this one will get like 5K
Statistically speaking, 5K is twice what I can reasonably expect. Plus, you seem mean.
@@MarcusGallo9000 Paradox, I overestimated you by 2x by your own standarts and you are the one calling me mean? WTF man...
@@MarcusGallo9000 Yeah man, it is not cool to call your most loyal subscribers "mean" I am unsubscribing bro 😠
@@Pan_Hroch Ha!
You will never get a million in anything but video games. Permanent peanut gallery guy.