I think you should have bought more Kubs instead of relying on the AA jets so much. They don't have the highest chance of hitting the F-15 but it can help scare them off / deal with the less good stuff like the A-10s without risking your Su-27s. I also think that getting a couple of rapiras in the forests would have helped a lot against the bradleys too.
You are right about the rapiras, but I simply didn't have enough points for everything so I prioritized other stuff. About the Kubs, the problem is that SEAD would completely counter it, because I either have to turn it off for it not to die, or leave it on to (maybe) stop the bomber but killed by the SEAD in the process. Also it will only cover one side of the map, while a fighter can be used quickly everywhere. So optimally you want to have both, but there again, only limited points available.
@@Aim_Deusi The way I see it is that you can have two Kubs for the price of one fighter, (or less if it's the Su-27) and that's effectively full-map coverage if you keep them supplied and manage to micro them (I tend to just stick all my radar AA on a single hotkey and toggle it as needed). The point flow issues are very understandable though, I also tend to have issues with managing to be everywhere at once on airport. It's just such a massive map.
@@mrdoge9508 yeah two Kubs can cover a whole map, but when an enemy uses a bomber and a SEAD plane in conjunction, thats when you need a fighter. And that's why I prefer to have both
I think you should have bought more Kubs instead of relying on the AA jets so much. They don't have the highest chance of hitting the F-15 but it can help scare them off / deal with the less good stuff like the A-10s without risking your Su-27s. I also think that getting a couple of rapiras in the forests would have helped a lot against the bradleys too.
You are right about the rapiras, but I simply didn't have enough points for everything so I prioritized other stuff.
About the Kubs, the problem is that SEAD would completely counter it, because I either have to turn it off for it not to die, or leave it on to (maybe) stop the bomber but killed by the SEAD in the process. Also it will only cover one side of the map, while a fighter can be used quickly everywhere. So optimally you want to have both, but there again, only limited points available.
@@Aim_Deusi The way I see it is that you can have two Kubs for the price of one fighter, (or less if it's the Su-27) and that's effectively full-map coverage if you keep them supplied and manage to micro them (I tend to just stick all my radar AA on a single hotkey and toggle it as needed).
The point flow issues are very understandable though, I also tend to have issues with managing to be everywhere at once on airport. It's just such a massive map.
@@mrdoge9508 yeah two Kubs can cover a whole map, but when an enemy uses a bomber and a SEAD plane in conjunction, thats when you need a fighter. And that's why I prefer to have both