it's like looking at a forest through binoculars and realizing that everything looks the same! But as soon as you look at a part of the forest, for example a single tree, you notice that it does not grow the same as other trees, even though it is made of the same basic material and is exposed to the same radiation and gravity. Everything is relative! The Mirror universe theory will add nothing to our current knowledge
A whole lot of what if's and might have happened but one thing is for certain now. Professional physicists and astrophysicists never predicted the JWST would find old, fully mature galaxies at the edge of the observable universe in any publication, or peer reviewed paper. I however did. In 2004 I realized that the theory of general relativity never addressed the action causing gravity. It was supposed to explain gravity to the tee. I thought, if Einstein, Newton and Kepler were really trying to describe gravity, then why didn't they start their equations with the action responsible and then determine the reactions from the action? According to the laws of motion, for every action there is an equal yet completely opposite reaction. They never addressed the action causing the reaction of gravity, dark matter, dark energy, or even the high velocity dispersion of matter in galaxies. These are all reactions. Motion of matter requires an action or cause. But nobody has ever came up with an action which would explain all the motion. So, I came up with a single action that causes all these reactions, from gravity to dark energy. The single action even explains why radio telescopes measure massive amounts of high energy photons "light" emanating from the surface of supermassive black holes. I published the paperback book *SECRET UNIVERSE : GRAVITY BY RON KEMP* September 27, 2021, 3 months before the JWST was launched. Ya see, after I determined the action causing gravity in nature, I came to the conclusion that all the theories and laws of physics up to this point was incomplete too because the law of thermodynamics begins with the premise energy and matter cannot be created. On page 48 I wrote quote, "The JWST, James Webb Space Telescope will discover old, fully grown galaxies as far as the telescope can see, further than 13.8 billion light-years away." Think about it. If energy is constantly being added to the universe by all the large spheres creating gravity then we would never know when the universe began. the universe could have been creating energy hundreds of trillions of years ago. So the most distant galaxies in one direction if true would be older, larger, brighter than our own galaxy but located at the edge of the observable universe. While on the opposite side of the universe galaxies would be smaller and younger with distance all the way up to an edge where no more matter can be seen. It would be a massive void with nothing beyond it, an edge to the observable universe. I eventually realized that energy is constantly being created new in the universe in order to produce gravity constantly. Gravity is a constant. Thus the action responsible for gravity must also be a constant. I then asked myself, if energy is constantly being created new, then what would be creating it? Well, where does gravity seem to originate? It's coming from the exact center of the large sphere, be it a black hole, star, planet or even a double lobed comet. It doesn't appear to originate from tiny spheres like individual atoms. Thus why general relativity and quantum field theory clash, and are unable to merge into one viable theory. The story continues, and so do the reaction produced because of energy constantly being added new in the universe by all the large spheres floating in the vacuum of space. The experiment by the professor and his students sort of proved my postulate that large spheres floating in space "ungrounded" constantly create new energy. That new energy when it radiates from the sphere in every direction it causes an equal opposite reaction to everything around it. Everything moves towards the point where the blunt of all the energy is being created, which is the exact center of the sphere. The story deepens and the prediction what this postulate leads to is eye opening. The crazy thing is a physicist in 2015 submitted a paper proving this action as a force that creates energy and peer review published without the understanding to the implication of over-unity of energy. They didn't even put 2 and 2 together, realize what the results of the experiment entailed. The Harvard professor discovered how single protons (hydrogen gas) suspended in a vacuum by weak EM fields can produce massive amounts of energy in the form of high energy infrared, x-rays, gamma rays, neutrinos and microwaves. I knew more energy was being produced by the hydrogen gas than the EM energy they input into the gas cloud. All they did was use visible light, which can be powered by a 1.5v AAA battery. The results were astounding. They measured temperatures fluctuating between 52,000° F and 120,000° F in the gas cloud. Telling me that more energy was not created than what went into the experiment. You would be lying. There is no way a 1.5v energy source could create such high energy photons alone. The tiny spherically shaped protons floating in the vacuum "ungrounded" was creating massive amounts of energy when visible light passed through them. I congratulated the peer review editor for publishing the paper to the physics journal because they published the paper proving over-unity of energy is indeed possible. A few days later i returned to the peer review web site and the professor's paper and my comment was gone. This all catered upon my premise that large spheres floating in the vacuum of space by countless weak EM fields creates energy deep inside the sphere. It's when that energy radiates out and away from the surface of the sphere it causes an equal opposite reaction we call gravity. Edit: the creation of energy deep in the cores of stars and collections of stars, galaxies and areas in space concentrated with galaxies, or galaxy clusters would cause them to slowly accelerate at a constant. I came up with a constant 0.00000482 in/s (0.0000122 cm/s). This is the motion astronomers pin on dark matter and the accelerated expansion of space pinned on dark energy. If all stars and galaxies were accelerating at the same slow pace, 0.00000482 in/s (0.0000122 cm/s) then the older they were the more momentum they would have built up in their lifetime. Added up over time it comes out to an acceleration of a 1 mi/h increase in velocity every 10,000 years.
Very entertaining video, thanks Territory! 1) I assume that our universe cannot be explained with physical and quantum physical processes alone. For example, the duality in practically every area - matter + antimatter - repulsive and attractive gravity - even in our life existence we can find this duality, namely in the material existence and in the spiritual - higher (supra)consciousness. Once we understand this duality better, we will also understand much more about the universe and how it works in detail. 2) It is very likely that there will be many more large cosmic structures and other universes (predecessor-, parallel universes) outside the scope of our current universe. We could even speak of a multiverse. All of these greatest cosmic superlatives are connected in one form or another. 3) At the moment, with the great JWST, we are discovering a lot of "strange" fully grown and bright red-shift galaxies (JADES / GLASS / CEERS) that may have come from the predecessor universe. These discoveries make the Big Bang impossible, they probably existed even 16 billion years ago. But here we reach the limits of our human knowledge and consciousness, we must be patient and try to understand things bit by bit... 📡
Quite interesting hipothesis, but I'm afraid it explains nothing. I personally believe that the Universe is flat, has no beginning and no end, and might be even infinite. But our, observable universe is completely different story, it could have been initiated at certain point and evolved in a manner that is not yet quite understóod by science. Whether BB, or cyclical, or paralell, etc, everything is possible, but we know nothing for sure, and might have never found out. One thing I know is, that we are not going to solve this puzzle through mathematics, no matter how advanced. The reality is hidden in space and in micro scale, down to the Planck size, not on paper with mathematical equations. Only JWST or big accelerators and other experimental equipment can give us real answers.
Yes, that's right, the observable cosmos is just a section of our currently known active universe. We can´t solve the puzzle with mathematics and physics alone! Behind it (very probably) are the predecessor universes, we don't know how many of them there were. However, our current cyclical universe is incredibly perfect and extensive, so I assume there were several of these previous universes. Evolution makes it possible...
Here's my theory what if the observable universe it's not just one point in the greater universe what about multiple points in different regions of the actual universe that contains their own observable points in the unobservable universe that we can't see with current technology like just think about like each region of the actual universe is different depending on where you are at a different observable point in the actual universe itself you should talk about that type of possibility that I came up with and also someone could have a different point of what is even observable in the universe which may not overlap like please consider talking about that
it's like looking at a forest through binoculars and realizing that everything looks the same! But as soon as you look at a part of the forest, for example a single tree, you notice that it does not grow the same as other trees, even though it is made of the same basic material and is exposed to the same radiation and gravity. Everything is relative! The Mirror universe theory will add nothing to our current knowledge
A whole lot of what if's and might have happened but one thing is for certain now. Professional physicists and astrophysicists never predicted the JWST would find old, fully mature galaxies at the edge of the observable universe in any publication, or peer reviewed paper. I however did.
In 2004 I realized that the theory of general relativity never addressed the action causing gravity. It was supposed to explain gravity to the tee. I thought, if Einstein, Newton and Kepler were really trying to describe gravity, then why didn't they start their equations with the action responsible and then determine the reactions from the action?
According to the laws of motion, for every action there is an equal yet completely opposite reaction. They never addressed the action causing the reaction of gravity, dark matter, dark energy, or even the high velocity dispersion of matter in galaxies. These are all reactions. Motion of matter requires an action or cause. But nobody has ever came up with an action which would explain all the motion. So, I came up with a single action that causes all these reactions, from gravity to dark energy. The single action even explains why radio telescopes measure massive amounts of high energy photons "light" emanating from the surface of supermassive black holes.
I published the paperback book *SECRET UNIVERSE : GRAVITY BY RON KEMP* September 27, 2021, 3 months before the JWST was launched. Ya see, after I determined the action causing gravity in nature, I came to the conclusion that all the theories and laws of physics up to this point was incomplete too because the law of thermodynamics begins with the premise energy and matter cannot be created.
On page 48 I wrote quote, "The JWST, James Webb Space Telescope will discover old, fully grown galaxies as far as the telescope can see, further than 13.8 billion light-years away." Think about it. If energy is constantly being added to the universe by all the large spheres creating gravity then we would never know when the universe began. the universe could have been creating energy hundreds of trillions of years ago. So the most distant galaxies in one direction if true would be older, larger, brighter than our own galaxy but located at the edge of the observable universe. While on the opposite side of the universe galaxies would be smaller and younger with distance all the way up to an edge where no more matter can be seen. It would be a massive void with nothing beyond it, an edge to the observable universe.
I eventually realized that energy is constantly being created new in the universe in order to produce gravity constantly. Gravity is a constant. Thus the action responsible for gravity must also be a constant. I then asked myself, if energy is constantly being created new, then what would be creating it? Well, where does gravity seem to originate? It's coming from the exact center of the large sphere, be it a black hole, star, planet or even a double lobed comet. It doesn't appear to originate from tiny spheres like individual atoms. Thus why general relativity and quantum field theory clash, and are unable to merge into one viable theory. The story continues, and so do the reaction produced because of energy constantly being added new in the universe by all the large spheres floating in the vacuum of space. The experiment by the professor and his students sort of proved my postulate that large spheres floating in space "ungrounded" constantly create new energy. That new energy when it radiates from the sphere in every direction it causes an equal opposite reaction to everything around it. Everything moves towards the point where the blunt of all the energy is being created, which is the exact center of the sphere. The story deepens and the prediction what this postulate leads to is eye opening.
The crazy thing is a physicist in 2015 submitted a paper proving this action as a force that creates energy and peer review published without the understanding to the implication of over-unity of energy. They didn't even put 2 and 2 together, realize what the results of the experiment entailed. The Harvard professor discovered how single protons (hydrogen gas) suspended in a vacuum by weak EM fields can produce massive amounts of energy in the form of high energy infrared, x-rays, gamma rays, neutrinos and microwaves. I knew more energy was being produced by the hydrogen gas than the EM energy they input into the gas cloud. All they did was use visible light, which can be powered by a 1.5v AAA battery.
The results were astounding. They measured temperatures fluctuating between 52,000° F and 120,000° F in the gas cloud. Telling me that more energy was not created than what went into the experiment. You would be lying. There is no way a 1.5v energy source could create such high energy photons alone. The tiny spherically shaped protons floating in the vacuum "ungrounded" was creating massive amounts of energy when visible light passed through them.
I congratulated the peer review editor for publishing the paper to the physics journal because they published the paper proving over-unity of energy is indeed possible. A few days later i returned to the peer review web site and the professor's paper and my comment was gone. This all catered upon my premise that large spheres floating in the vacuum of space by countless weak EM fields creates energy deep inside the sphere. It's when that energy radiates out and away from the surface of the sphere it causes an equal opposite reaction we call gravity.
Edit: the creation of energy deep in the cores of stars and collections of stars, galaxies and areas in space concentrated with galaxies, or galaxy clusters would cause them to slowly accelerate at a constant. I came up with a constant 0.00000482 in/s (0.0000122 cm/s). This is the motion astronomers pin on dark matter and the accelerated expansion of space pinned on dark energy. If all stars and galaxies were accelerating at the same slow pace, 0.00000482 in/s (0.0000122 cm/s) then the older they were the more momentum they would have built up in their lifetime. Added up over time it comes out to an acceleration of a 1 mi/h increase in velocity every 10,000 years.
Very entertaining video, thanks Territory!
1) I assume that our universe cannot be explained with physical and quantum physical processes alone. For example, the duality in practically every area - matter + antimatter - repulsive and attractive gravity - even in our life existence we can find this duality, namely in the material existence and in the spiritual - higher (supra)consciousness.
Once we understand this duality better, we will also understand much more about the universe and how it works in detail.
2) It is very likely that there will be many more large cosmic structures and other universes (predecessor-, parallel universes) outside the scope of our current universe.
We could even speak of a multiverse. All of these greatest cosmic superlatives are connected in one form or another.
3) At the moment, with the great JWST, we are discovering a lot of "strange" fully grown and bright red-shift galaxies (JADES / GLASS / CEERS) that may have come from the predecessor universe. These discoveries make the Big Bang impossible, they probably existed even 16 billion years ago. But here we reach the limits of our human knowledge and consciousness, we must be patient and try to understand things bit by bit... 📡
It's as I suspected...Bizarro Superman DOES exist in a Bizzaro universe somewhere.
The thing is that's not possible if there were a parody at the beginning then time can't run backwards from the beginning, this violates everything
No, it isn't here to stay. It's just another part of the rabbit hole appearing briefly as the physicists continue their downward fall.
Why stop at two?
Quite interesting hipothesis, but I'm afraid it explains nothing. I personally believe that the Universe is flat, has no beginning and no end, and might be even infinite. But our, observable universe is completely different story, it could have been initiated at certain point and evolved in a manner that is not yet quite understóod by science. Whether BB, or cyclical, or paralell, etc, everything is possible, but we know nothing for sure, and might have never found out. One thing I know is, that we are not going to solve this puzzle through mathematics, no matter how advanced. The reality is hidden in space and in micro scale, down to the Planck size, not on paper with mathematical equations. Only JWST or big accelerators and other experimental equipment can give us real answers.
Yes, that's right, the observable cosmos is just a section of our currently known active universe. We can´t solve the puzzle with mathematics and physics alone!
Behind it (very probably) are the predecessor universes, we don't know how many of them there were. However, our current cyclical universe is incredibly perfect and extensive, so I assume there were several of these previous universes.
Evolution makes it possible...
6:30 so... what is it then?
Here's my theory what if the observable universe it's not just one point in the greater universe what about multiple points in different regions of the actual universe that contains their own observable points in the unobservable universe that we can't see with current technology like just think about like each region of the actual universe is different depending on where you are at a different observable point in the actual universe itself you should talk about that type of possibility that I came up with and also someone could have a different point of what is even observable in the universe which may not overlap like please consider talking about that