Thank you so much. Very Very helpful for my exam in the morning. Will continue to watch your videos for help! You teach in a way that is very easy to understand.
at 02:48, how does it intersect at 2 for a? why not 1. The extension from b towards the intercept on a should not be from the half but directly through the edge of the cube or? what am I missing here
Imagine if you had the interception of the plane with a at 1. That would also mean that the top left corner of the drawn plane (which is also at a =1) had the same position on the axis. Therefore the plane would be parallel to the c-axis if you keep the interception with b fixed (like in the following example 04:31). Also if you come from c = 2 you go one segment down and one towards a. Doing it again will lead to c = 0 and a = 2. I have to admit going from b -> a is quite difficult to spot because there is no direct line to see..
The underlying assumption is that all planes that are parallel will have the same indices. Thus, it is irrelevant where you shift the origin. **note: if you shift the origin "in front of" vs. "behind" the plane, you'll obtain planes with indices that have opposite signs from each other (e.g., (-1 0 2) vs. (1 0 -2)). However, as planes don't have a "sign", these are identical/equivalent.
you probably dont care but does anyone know of a trick to log back into an Instagram account..? I was dumb forgot the account password. I appreciate any tips you can give me
@Frederick Jamal Thanks for your reply. I got to the site on google and im waiting for the hacking stuff atm. I see it takes quite some time so I will get back to you later when my account password hopefully is recovered.
Dear @UCpsvdl0nKBqEpMqVyXkSSeg, you teach us brilliantly. your concept forces me to write the comment I just wanna say Thank you so much. best wishes to you
If you are asking if a plane (2 -1 2) is the same as a plane (1 -1/2 1), then this is true (finding intercepts for these two cases would result in two parallel planes). However, by convention, we generally avoid writing fractions in planar indices.
Hi Professor. Thank you for the amazing lectures. I have a question about the problem from 8:17. If I don't shift the origin, the B point plane will be falling outside the unit cube. Is it ok??
8:43 omg this helped so much. Idk why it was taking me so long to visualize it like that, but seeing it this way actually helped so much
Thank you so much. Very Very helpful for my exam in the morning. Will continue to watch your videos for help! You teach in a way that is very easy to understand.
U teach very well. It's easier to understand. Thank you.
Thank you sir for your explanation! The way you explained it is timeless and easy to understand.
Somehow you made this appear simple, and I suppose it is after watching your tutorial. Cheers
Thank you sir, after i watch this i really know whats happening and understand
Fabulous! The best explanation ever!
Thank you so much Prof. I didn't understand it in the whole course which you clarified in less than 10 minutes
I am from India and your lecture rally helps me sir thankyou
at 02:48, how does it intersect at 2 for a? why not 1. The extension from b towards the intercept on a should not be from the half but directly through the edge of the cube or? what am I missing here
I am also curious? is it because the length is longer than the 1 intercept?
Imagine if you had the interception of the plane with a at 1. That would also mean that the top left corner of the drawn plane (which is also at a =1) had the same position on the axis. Therefore the plane would be parallel to the c-axis if you keep the interception with b fixed (like in the following example 04:31). Also if you come from c = 2 you go one segment down and one towards a. Doing it again will lead to c = 0 and a = 2. I have to admit going from b -> a is quite difficult to spot because there is no direct line to see..
Good god this saved my life
Excelente. La interpretación de esta nomenclatura resulta muy clara con los ejemplos ofrecidos.
Howdy! 🤠
And thank you, brother! 🙏
Is it matter where you shift the origin?? Or you could move it anywhere??
The underlying assumption is that all planes that are parallel will have the same indices. Thus, it is irrelevant where you shift the origin. **note: if you shift the origin "in front of" vs. "behind" the plane, you'll obtain planes with indices that have opposite signs from each other (e.g., (-1 0 2) vs. (1 0 -2)). However, as planes don't have a "sign", these are identical/equivalent.
thank you so much for the video. This video helps me a lot on getting through my HW.
you probably dont care but does anyone know of a trick to log back into an Instagram account..?
I was dumb forgot the account password. I appreciate any tips you can give me
@Iker Emanuel instablaster :)
@Frederick Jamal Thanks for your reply. I got to the site on google and im waiting for the hacking stuff atm.
I see it takes quite some time so I will get back to you later when my account password hopefully is recovered.
@Frederick Jamal It did the trick and I finally got access to my account again. I am so happy:D
Thank you so much, you saved my ass :D
@Iker Emanuel happy to help =)
thankkuuu sir I was bugged by this question BT u made it easy
Thank you very much sir
Thank you
amazing explanation
thank you for your knowledge
Thanks sir very clear
Dear @UCpsvdl0nKBqEpMqVyXkSSeg, you teach us brilliantly. your concept forces me to write the comment I just wanna say Thank you so much. best wishes to you
wonderful !
sir what purpose we shall use Miller indices in crystallography
Thank you so much! Awesome!
thanks
Thank you so much sir,It was pretty helpful.
This is fantastic!!
Hi, what is the application of indices?
thank you good sir.
Beautiful
Sir one doubt in 3rd index how c would -1 please explain
was very helpful
That was nice sir
thank youuuuuuuuuu
awsome
so helpful. thank you
thank you..... that was helpful
thank you so muchh
really clearly presented:D
Tq so much for the subtitle!!!!
doctor, can we put 2 out for the last one then we will get 2 (1 - 1/2 1)
U have to inverse that... nothing else. that's the role
more like thats a rule *
If you are asking if a plane (2 -1 2) is the same as a plane (1 -1/2 1), then this is true (finding intercepts for these two cases would result in two parallel planes). However, by convention, we generally avoid writing fractions in planar indices.
you are a god among men thanks to you i dont have to go to class thanks and gig em
Thanks a lot. ^_^
Plane (1,-1,-1) ?
I guess the first question answer is not (1 2 1). It is something else. Am i right?
Hi Professor. Thank you for the amazing lectures. I have a question about the problem from 8:17. If I don't shift the origin, the B point plane will be falling outside the unit cube. Is it ok??
Thankyou so very much ! ^_^
funny that im taking the exact class at tamu and my prof doesnt do anywhere near a good job as this guy.
good luck on the test tmrw. i will see u in class
howdy
in his exam, Date: me please. lol