Thank you so much. Very Very helpful for my exam in the morning. Will continue to watch your videos for help! You teach in a way that is very easy to understand.
at 02:48, how does it intersect at 2 for a? why not 1. The extension from b towards the intercept on a should not be from the half but directly through the edge of the cube or? what am I missing here
Imagine if you had the interception of the plane with a at 1. That would also mean that the top left corner of the drawn plane (which is also at a =1) had the same position on the axis. Therefore the plane would be parallel to the c-axis if you keep the interception with b fixed (like in the following example 04:31). Also if you come from c = 2 you go one segment down and one towards a. Doing it again will lead to c = 0 and a = 2. I have to admit going from b -> a is quite difficult to spot because there is no direct line to see..
you probably dont care but does anyone know of a trick to log back into an Instagram account..? I was dumb forgot the account password. I appreciate any tips you can give me
@Frederick Jamal Thanks for your reply. I got to the site on google and im waiting for the hacking stuff atm. I see it takes quite some time so I will get back to you later when my account password hopefully is recovered.
The underlying assumption is that all planes that are parallel will have the same indices. Thus, it is irrelevant where you shift the origin. **note: if you shift the origin "in front of" vs. "behind" the plane, you'll obtain planes with indices that have opposite signs from each other (e.g., (-1 0 2) vs. (1 0 -2)). However, as planes don't have a "sign", these are identical/equivalent.
Hi Professor. Thank you for the amazing lectures. I have a question about the problem from 8:17. If I don't shift the origin, the B point plane will be falling outside the unit cube. Is it ok??
Dear @UCpsvdl0nKBqEpMqVyXkSSeg, you teach us brilliantly. your concept forces me to write the comment I just wanna say Thank you so much. best wishes to you
If you are asking if a plane (2 -1 2) is the same as a plane (1 -1/2 1), then this is true (finding intercepts for these two cases would result in two parallel planes). However, by convention, we generally avoid writing fractions in planar indices.
8:43 omg this helped so much. Idk why it was taking me so long to visualize it like that, but seeing it this way actually helped so much
U teach very well. It's easier to understand. Thank you.
Thank you so much. Very Very helpful for my exam in the morning. Will continue to watch your videos for help! You teach in a way that is very easy to understand.
at 02:48, how does it intersect at 2 for a? why not 1. The extension from b towards the intercept on a should not be from the half but directly through the edge of the cube or? what am I missing here
I am also curious? is it because the length is longer than the 1 intercept?
Imagine if you had the interception of the plane with a at 1. That would also mean that the top left corner of the drawn plane (which is also at a =1) had the same position on the axis. Therefore the plane would be parallel to the c-axis if you keep the interception with b fixed (like in the following example 04:31). Also if you come from c = 2 you go one segment down and one towards a. Doing it again will lead to c = 0 and a = 2. I have to admit going from b -> a is quite difficult to spot because there is no direct line to see..
Thank you sir for your explanation! The way you explained it is timeless and easy to understand.
Thank you sir, after i watch this i really know whats happening and understand
Fabulous! The best explanation ever!
Good god this saved my life
Somehow you made this appear simple, and I suppose it is after watching your tutorial. Cheers
Thank you so much Prof. I didn't understand it in the whole course which you clarified in less than 10 minutes
I am from India and your lecture rally helps me sir thankyou
Howdy! 🤠
And thank you, brother! 🙏
thankkuuu sir I was bugged by this question BT u made it easy
Excelente. La interpretación de esta nomenclatura resulta muy clara con los ejemplos ofrecidos.
thank you so much for the video. This video helps me a lot on getting through my HW.
you probably dont care but does anyone know of a trick to log back into an Instagram account..?
I was dumb forgot the account password. I appreciate any tips you can give me
@Iker Emanuel instablaster :)
@Frederick Jamal Thanks for your reply. I got to the site on google and im waiting for the hacking stuff atm.
I see it takes quite some time so I will get back to you later when my account password hopefully is recovered.
@Frederick Jamal It did the trick and I finally got access to my account again. I am so happy:D
Thank you so much, you saved my ass :D
@Iker Emanuel happy to help =)
Is it matter where you shift the origin?? Or you could move it anywhere??
The underlying assumption is that all planes that are parallel will have the same indices. Thus, it is irrelevant where you shift the origin. **note: if you shift the origin "in front of" vs. "behind" the plane, you'll obtain planes with indices that have opposite signs from each other (e.g., (-1 0 2) vs. (1 0 -2)). However, as planes don't have a "sign", these are identical/equivalent.
sir what purpose we shall use Miller indices in crystallography
Hi, what is the application of indices?
Sir one doubt in 3rd index how c would -1 please explain
Hi Professor. Thank you for the amazing lectures. I have a question about the problem from 8:17. If I don't shift the origin, the B point plane will be falling outside the unit cube. Is it ok??
Dear @UCpsvdl0nKBqEpMqVyXkSSeg, you teach us brilliantly. your concept forces me to write the comment I just wanna say Thank you so much. best wishes to you
Thank you so much sir,It was pretty helpful.
amazing explanation
you are a god among men thanks to you i dont have to go to class thanks and gig em
thank you for your knowledge
This is fantastic!!
doctor, can we put 2 out for the last one then we will get 2 (1 - 1/2 1)
U have to inverse that... nothing else. that's the role
more like thats a rule *
If you are asking if a plane (2 -1 2) is the same as a plane (1 -1/2 1), then this is true (finding intercepts for these two cases would result in two parallel planes). However, by convention, we generally avoid writing fractions in planar indices.
can't thank u enough
Thank you so much! Awesome!
Thank you very much sir
Thanks sir very clear
thank you..... that was helpful
thank you good sir.
That was nice sir
Plane (1,-1,-1) ?
Thank you
so helpful. thank you
I guess the first question answer is not (1 2 1). It is something else. Am i right?
wonderful !
really clearly presented：D
Beautiful
was very helpful
thanks
Tq so much for the subtitle!!!!
thank youuuuuuuuuu
awsome
Thanks a lot. ^_^
thank you so muchh
Thankyou so very much ! ^_^
funny that im taking the exact class at tamu and my prof doesnt do anywhere near a good job as this guy.
good luck on the test tmrw. i will see u in class
in his exam, Date: me please. lol
howdy
Wonderful explanation