Windows vs Linux vs macOS: The Best OS According to ChatGPT
Вставка
- Опубліковано 16 лют 2023
- I asked ChatGPT to resolve the age-old dilemma - Which is better - Windows, Linux or macOS?
After a lot of back and forth, the chatbot identified six main pillars of an operating system, assigned a best option for each of the pillars, acknowledged that a score list based on its own assessment could be created, and finally confirmed a clear winner under the set circumstances.
Music:
- To Pass Time by Godmode
- Chill Day by Lakey Inspired - Наука та технологія
As a linux user: I approve this conclusion
Yea it not that just u approve, it has merit it is actually better as it been designed properly. Just drivers and compatibility is the only reason why windows still exists.
As a Linux user I also agree with this conclusion
As another Linux user, I also agree with this conclusion
as a windows user i also agree with this conclusion xD. the only thing that keeps me on windows is the job with apps that don't work on linux.
@@andrey.003like what apps?
I'd argue the pillars are accurate, but each person/user weights the pillars differently
Yeah, it depends on the individual which pillar he or she focuses on the most.
Exactly what I thought. I love linux and use it quite a bit but see myself coming back to Windows for many daily client side tasks. This happens almost exclusively because of the compatibility point. Most hardware and software manufacturers seem to prefer supporting WIndows. I assume that's mostly because of the perceived return on investment being short term target audience per integration effort. I hope this will change since Linux is more open, modular and in my eyes has a big advantage in basic funcationality like filesystems, networking, ... Let's see.
And chat GPT runs on linux servers and is probably trained by linux servers
obvious judge bias then, chatGPT was paid off by big Open Source
@Watcher my dad was a server
Is my computer a server? No, so I do not install Linux on my computer.
@@SarmadTechLab thanks for the laugh
@@SarmadTechLab windows also has a server version btw.
As a software developer, I use Linux (Kubuntu) as my daily driver. I used to use Windows and I didn't switch out of a dislike for Windows. I switch because it was easier to develop on the same operating system I am deploying to. However, I find that it I struggle less with Linux, it just doesn't get in the way and my workflow is improved.
Is Linux good for Linux?
kubuntu is slow bro
lets gooo
fellow kubuntu user in the wild
@@krishnabillonaire516 how so?
@@RenderingUser No kubuntu is not slow.
I had some problems with my hardware which made it slow
but overall it's awesome
As a Long time on/off Linux user since the mid 90's who was finally able to make the full switch only just a few years back after it got good AMD GPU support for gaming, and a few other things(Windows 10, and it's BS was also a big push for me to make the switch) I'm truly glad to see how far it's come, to where so many people outside of the server/mainframe/workstation space no longer see it as a hobbyist OS, but as one that can be daily driven for just about any task. My 2nd OS on my phones, and tablets, is Android, so I'm very interested to see which one the AI chose. 👍
Bruh android is Linux. You've made the full switch and you didn't even realize it!
I did the same thing, don't care about Linux, I just care about my computer DOING WHAT I TELL IT TO DO AND NOT QUESTIONING ME ABOUT IT!!!!!!!!
I have used Linux for my whole master's degree. I'll graduate in a month or so. It's been mostly a smooth ride. I did switch from Ubuntu to Pop!_OS during my studies.
Android is Linux. It uses Linux Kernel, modified for Touch interface. So, the answer is also Linux.
The problem with using a language model AI like GPT is that it's really based off of scraped data from the Internet.
It's not really so much an AI coming up with a genuine opinion, but just a machine trying to predict the next word based on the context or the prompt it was given.
What ChatGPT says isn't cold and calculating, but subject to the opinions of real people it was fed data from.
Therefore we can't rely on chatgpt to give us any interesting or unique answers, it's all regurgitations of things previously said.
It's wisdom of the crowd but personified.
Arguments can be made that asking everyone in a large enough group the same, objective question, then averaging the answer usually yields correct or close to correct results, which is basically what OpenAI has done for every possible question by scraping the whole internet. This is why ChatGPT keeps reiterating that it can only provide information, not opinion. The information it provides is more often than not the collective opinion of every internet user, which it then regards as fact.
UnuAI was an interesting experiment in this field about a decade ago, in which a group of random people would answer questions by weighing down an online scale, with the added twist that they could change their answer based on the current average answer. The group usually converged on a demonstrably correct answer, even if nobody was an expert on the given subject.
@@covoeus It's even worse than that, because unlike Bing's Sydney which at least sources its statements with links to what it references, ChatGPT doesn't do that, it's basically just saying "I hear…" thus making it literal hearsay. 🤦
Also Linux people are the most annoying users, Windows Chads don't care about OS
Thank you for sharing your thoughts about language model AI like GPT, but I must respectfully disagree. While it is true that GPT is trained on vast amounts of text data scraped from the Internet, it is also important to understand that this data comes from the opinions and insights of countless real people.
The ability of GPT to generate responses that sound natural and coherent is a testament to the quality and diversity of the data it was trained on. And while GPT is not capable of forming opinions or emotions like a human, it is able to generate unique and interesting responses to prompts it has never seen before.
In fact, one of the most exciting aspects of language model AI like GPT is its potential to provide new insights and perspectives on a wide range of topics. While it may not always be perfect, I believe that GPT can be a valuable tool for generating fresh and thought-provoking content.
What you describe is an Algorithm. AI, while also based of data from internet, are able to memorize their own answers and external feedback that they have given and learn from it.
(This is a oversimplification, and cmiiw)
Basically, an Algorithm will ONLY summarize the data and will output the same thing over and over regardless of user feedback (unless you changed the program itself),
AI, while it in itself is also an algorithm, what makes them different is that they can re-"adjust" themselves. for example, an AI might output the same thing as an Algorithm the first few times, but overtime, it can learn and adapt from the feedback that it received, changing their own "algorithm" by themselves.
So, by analyzing billions of data and interacting with human countless time, I think it save to assume that ChatGPT's answers is ChatGPT's own opinion at this point.
Ubuntu has set me free in ways I never thought I'd want.
Now I can customize my system how I like, know exactly what is on my system, and never will I have to worry about my system being bugged by the company that made it*. I'd like to see Microsoft let me change up my copy of Windows.
*Canonical may ask for some anonymous data to refine Ubuntu, but they always ask, and even then, this is exclusively an Ubuntu thing.
Also the Ubuntu Pro ads lol
But I think it'd actually be helpful for enterprises so it's more like letting them know they can still maintain packages but ofc it's gotta cost an extra
@Float Samples yeah that explains why even Microsoft uses Linux /s
@@FloatSamplesBharathG100 The only reason Windows is considered "good" is because software, hardware, and games support it far more widely than both Linux and MacOS.
And the reason why it's more popular in the first place is because they manipulate manufacturers. they provide a HUGE discount for windows licenses, but only if you don't ship devices with competing operating systems too much. This strategy is used by Intel too, actually.
20 years ago, Microsoft was TERRIFIED at the idea of a competing operating system, that is free and does everything Windows does and is open source and runs on anything and is better, existing. They have secretly funded lawsuits, they've spread misinformation, they've created fear both for manufacturers and users, and generally they've succeeded at making their inferior operating system successful still.
This is why Linux doesn't have a lot of market share. This is why software does not support Linux as well as it supports Windows. This is why Microsoft offers Office for every platform EXCEPT linux. This is why you will never find a computer running Linux on your hardware store, and you're a hundred times more likely to see a computer with no OS within than a computer with Linux preinstalled. This is why almost every big corporation has basically a deal with Microsoft not to support Linux.
If more people used Linux, more developers would contribute to it as well also, so in a timeline where Microsoft failed their censorship campaign and Linux replaced Windows, user experience on Linux would be much better as well..
But alas, continue support the OS you prefer that definitely has effort put into and definitely is not an ancient floppy disk era trashpile with a modern skin put on top and definitely has care and effort put into lmao (stop sympathizing Microsoft, they are not your friend)
@@aquaponieee also- ive never had linux crash ("bluescreen") on me, ive never had to restart because of an update. The so called "stability" that ive heard from windows users is fake. 🎉
@@sudoalex Microsoft uses all 3 operating systems because they release products for all of them... Duuuh.
They especially use linux because of the WSL implementation, they also use android because of WSA in win 11.
Even if you only count the pillars on which macOS and Windows have won, I think Linux is still the winner.
In the last few years, Linux desktop environments have come a long way, I consider Gnome and KDE Plasma to be way better than Windows and macOS.
For hardware compatibility, Windows still wins when it comes to some very specific proprietary tools. But overall, from my personal experience, Linux has been a more hassle-free experience than Windows, most things just work (under the Ubuntu base at least, I haven't used many distros outside of it, like arch or fedora)
I’ve had a great experience with arch based distros for desktop, they work great and I’d recommend endeavor os
@@jimmified I also use Arch, it's fast, lightweight and powerful, Pacman and AUR opens a whole new world for you
What about xfce ??
I find it strange that MacOS was given the "best UI" award. Linux can have any UI you want. In fact, I've seen many people reproduce the MacOS UI. Some people even use AppImages to do the whole drag and drop "install" thing.
Oh. Right. Widely-held beliefs.
For users migrating to Linux from Windows, Cinnamon desktop will immediately feel more comfortable and endearing than either Gnome or Plasma.
This would never hold up in court this is absolutely leading the witness....
Yeah, but I clarified that in the video. The goal was not to reach an undeniable truth, but simply to see what the AI would come up with using the mechanisms it has.
@@chmtech Objection!!
I bet ChatGPT would give "Windows Phone" as the answer for that question at the end
Just a joke, I think ChatGPT would also give the "depends on each person" like the Windows vs Linux one originally
I don't think "windows phone" is an operating system?
@Watcheroh, I guess I should have Googled before I commented. Thanks
I know I'm in the minority but I liked windows phone.
@@JoelCook everyone that actually had a windows phone loved it, only the people that have never used it shit on it all the time
@@sixunity1171 It's the same thing with Linux, most people that say "Linux sucks" didn't even tried it
Btw if you say 'Answer in one word' and really convince chat gpt , it does give the answers, predictions, preferences which it deny in previous conversations.
I really don't mind waiting for these videos. Always thought provoking.
If ChatGPT agrees with my choice, I'm golden right :)
Although the general belief that OS X has a better user interface is VERY debatable, I for one do not agree with this at all.
yeah.
20 years ago, macos truly did have the best user interface ever, and their reputation was built up in that era
after so many years, the general opinion never changed, despite macos's interface not being that great and competitors having equal or better user interfaces, because apple is known for good design
@@aquaponieee I disagree.
Their UI back then didn't have proper maximize and minimize... they still don't.
Back then I used Fluxbox, there was nothing wrong with Windows either before images were being applied to the start menu.
And I've used all three OSes for a LONG time, the OS X interface has never satisfied me and I only really liked expose (which had its roots in the open source world as well).
agreed, the few times I used mac os it was painful to use, I picked up how to use linux instantly even though I had no experience with it at all it was so intuitive. I would even say that chrome os is better than mac os which is saying a lot because I can't stand chrome os either. even if macos was objectivly better which its not, linux is customizable which is more important and can be made to look and act like windows or mac os perfecly anyway which makes it superior
Yeah KDE has the best user interface out of any operating system desktop. I don't personally like gnome (it feels quite clunky and customisable compared to KDE) but it's supposedly really good for laptops
Personally I would put KDE at the top and then interfaces like gnome, win11 and macOS on the next level down (this is in terms of looks after configuring to how you want) all the operating systems seem to have had much more of a focus on UI the last couple of years
Dude this is OS XIV not OS X Apple doesn’t develop updates for OS X anymore OS X is years old
Gaming? Windows. Graphic & Video Editing? MacOS. Everything else? Linux! 💕
I have over 600 games in my Steam library. Of course I haven't tried every single one on Linux, but out of all the games I've played since switching to Linux a few years ago, only a few games didn't run or run poorly. The majority of the games I've played run as well or even better on Linux than on Microsucks Winblows.
its not worth a penny to use macos if its only for video editing or graphics.
The way I see it in terms of pillers is:
If you use computer you should use
Linux
And that’s about it, I have never heard a good reason to ever use a proprietary operating system, especially objective spy-ware like windows and Mac
I thinks its true Linux is overall the best OS. Thanks to all the distro existing, every type of user from the geek to my grandma can use it.
Unless your compagnie want you to use a very specifique software because of some old parnership.
Unless you have some extremily specifique hardware that use its own private standard and only developped drivers for windows.
But always not linux fault, just the popularity of OS.
@@briannormant3622 yep exactly if Linux and windows had an even split I don’t see a world where windows would exist (but then again Linux would cease to be what we know it as)
I think macOS has less Spyware than Windows
@@unknown_codec_404 Both have an unacceptable level of spyware, I think both have a just about equal level we just haven’t seen all the evil that apple does
@@unknown_codec_404that's the thing, they're closed source software and you can never know how much data they actually take, it's just that windows is very bad at hiding it and apple has a bunch of meaningless privacy ad campaigns
Destroying chat gpt with facts and logic
love the video, even tho it's short, but it's still good and well made)
Yeah, it's designed to be as agnostic as possible. Even when it gives "definitive" answers, it couches them in plenty of plausible-deniability rhetoric like "your mileage may vary", "do your own research", "this is just my opinion" and so on; it's trying hard to avoid making any specific claims to avoid legal ramifications. Even Bing's Sydney, which is specifically designed as a marketing and advertising tool that hypes up positives and downplay criticisms of products to push sales does this.
3:02 "MacOS entered the chat" - The one time that meme-y phrase is literal. 😂
I'm surprised ChatGPT didn't mention _weighted-scoring,_ for example, maybe compatibility is far more important to someone than any of the other pillars (eg an industrial setting using an air-gapped system connected to an ancient machine that uses a 16-bit DOS/Windows program to control it) or someone else might care about security above all else (government systems). It just lazily repeated "ymmv".
6:47 So basically, it can be guided to say whatever you want. Gee, that's just great, people deeefinitely won't abuse this to get get AI to do whatever they want and pretend it's fact. 🤦
People already use the first result of Google search to present their opinion as fact, we'll be fine
thats why I don't use chatgpt, because that makes it nearly useless, If I want to do research and try every option then I won't bother asking the AI to tell me to do that. When an unlocked AI with those stupid limitation is available I will happily use that
When comparing quality, like you did, price should never be a factor.
If one compares value, then what you did was fine.
I wasn’t really comparing quality. I just wanted it to come to some conclusion and rationalise it somehow
I strongly disagree with the opinion that Windows has a user friendly UI. It's simply the one most are used to. I liked **every** Linux Desktop Environment that I tried more.
MacOS' UI is beautiful but the UX can be terrible. I hate the window management. But I agree: For media editing a Mac is the best.
Windows is good for two areas: Gaming and Office 365 including Exchange an Active Directory for admins.
My next question would have been if it considers the 6 pillars equally important (for a desktop usecase) because users clearly do not.
(as nerd and user)
MacOS is Unix, Gnu Linux is Unix like, Windows (now) is NT.
MacOS got Terminal but with limitation, Gnu Linux got a full Terminal with it's risk, Windows got a something like useless called Powershell.
MacOS is BSD in every meaning possible with Mach(built for BSD's operative systems), Gnu Linux is Minix and it is Gnu as operative system and Linux as Kernel, Windows is only Windows NT.
MacOS never changed really but rumors said it is now completely written in FreeBSD, Gnu Linux doesn't have a standard but it's Linux in kernel, Windows NT is boring.
MacOS is half close suorce(userland, completely written on FreeBSD) and open suorce(the rest).
MacOS managed to have the best sandbox so this means people can produce the best art masterpieces here, Gnu Linux is the best when you need IT tools but got more instability, Windows NT is amazing for play video games but is damning bad in term of stability and quality.
MacOS as BSD is heavily based on the demons who will make your pc faster and trustable and reliable, Gnu Linux is more a mix of many many process mostly based on your choices, Windows NT is something people will always wondering since is "boh!".
MacOS as FreeBSD is privacy stability based since BSD got this as main ideology, Gnu Linux believe the freedom means everything and your ability do the rest, Windows is based how much you trust on Microsoft(I don't).
I'm questioning myself, i know this is not even related to the video but is the debate ever gonna stop🤔
It depends on how you weight those factors. User preferences will influence the weights heavily.
As user of Windows, MacOS and Gnu Linux(not "Linux" neither "Unix") I do end to understand what I miss more is my 'hometown".
There's no "better" or worse.
I do ended with MacOS because is BSD so I've got an amazing Terminal but since I got the comfort of a comercial software with the best sandbox and virtual ram every made.
(as nerd and user)
MacOS is Unix, Gnu Linux is Unix like, Windows (now) is NT.
MacOS got Terminal but with limitation, Gnu Linux got a full Terminal with it's risk, Windows got a something like useless called Powershell.
MacOS is BSD in every meaning possible with Mach(built for BSD's operative systems), Gnu Linux is Minix and it is Gnu as operative system and Linux as Kernel, Windows is only Windows NT.
MacOS never changed really but rumors said it is now completely written in FreeBSD, Gnu Linux doesn't have a standard but it's Linux in kernel, Windows NT is boring.
MacOS is half close suorce(userland, completely written on FreeBSD) and open suorce(the rest).
MacOS managed to have the best sandbox so this means people can produce the best art masterpieces here, Gnu Linux is the best when you need IT tools but got more instability, Windows NT is amazing for play video games but is damning bad in term of stability and quality.
MacOS as BSD is heavily based on the demons who will make your pc faster and trustable and reliable, Gnu Linux is more a mix of many many process mostly based on your choices, Windows NT is something people will always wondering since is "boh!".
MacOS as FreeBSD is privacy stability based since BSD got this as main ideology, Gnu Linux believe the freedom means everything and your ability do the rest, Windows is based how much you trust on Microsoft(I don't).
My OS Journey is as follows: i used windows between XP and 10 and then it was, Ubuntu, Pop_OS!, Mint, Manjaro, Mint, Manjaro, Arco, Arch.
Linux has been nothing but a wonderful learning experience, sure ive had some headaches at times but nothing a quick google search couldnt help to point me in the right direction, Ive learnt so much about computers how they work and how to use them effectively.
almost everything i do is now automated and its like i just have to think about what i wanna do and muscle memory and keyboard shortcuts just make it happen. Sure there is a curve where you need to get over the curb of creating and configurating things to be able to do that ( however i find it quite fun to tinker about )
@michaelscarport I've been gaming purely on linux for about 2 years now and it's definitely improved, and is almost great, there are however alot of games that just don't work like lost ark. However almost all games (on steam) just work or require some smaller setup.
Ironically I've had fewer problems gaming than my mate that is a hard-core Windows fan and I love teasing him about how all I have to do is to just type the name of the game and it boots
Windows 11 seem like a plane crash of ai and "over hyped features" and I'm glad I ditched it when I did.
Terminal based workflow is also a massive improvement, although definitely not required especially in the more mainstream distros like mint and ubuntu
Would you like to elaborate on how do you automate things. Particularly toos and workflow. I love using macros to automate simple workflows on ghub but still windows user. Wondering how that is achieved on linux.
@@RushabhPancholidelta2052This is mainly on lower levels, but also can be done on the lower levels of the OSI chain. That's the beauty of it. If you have the know-how you can hack as you see fit rather than reinvent the wheel on another OS.
in linux, the only operating that looks safe and amazing is ubuntu and its development is run by a company called canonical
i dont trust other major linux distrbution due to possibility of misuse of data
i would rather have a big company run the operating system development efforts than a group of people whom can develop linux distribution for wrong reason
ChatGPT is so accurate, it's scary.
(as nerd and user)
MacOS is Unix, Gnu Linux is Unix like, Windows (now) is NT.
MacOS got Terminal but with limitation, Gnu Linux got a full Terminal with it's risk, Windows got a something like useless called Powershell.
MacOS is BSD in every meaning possible with Mach(built for BSD's operative systems), Gnu Linux is Minix and it is Gnu as operative system and Linux as Kernel, Windows is only Windows NT.
MacOS never changed really but rumors said it is now completely written in FreeBSD, Gnu Linux doesn't have a standard but it's Linux in kernel, Windows NT is boring.
MacOS is half close suorce(userland, completely written on FreeBSD) and open suorce(the rest).
MacOS managed to have the best sandbox so this means people can produce the best art masterpieces here, Gnu Linux is the best when you need IT tools but got more instability, Windows NT is amazing for play video games but is damning bad in term of stability and quality.
MacOS as BSD is heavily based on the demons who will make your pc faster and trustable and reliable, Gnu Linux is more a mix of many many process mostly based on your choices, Windows NT is something people will always wondering since is "boh!".
MacOS as FreeBSD is privacy stability based since BSD got this as main ideology, Gnu Linux believe the freedom means everything and your ability do the rest, Windows is based how much you trust on Microsoft(I don't).
That is if the criteria is 1:1 in scoring. I would give more points to compatibility though.
I've used almost every OS imaginable and have been computing since 1984. I use Linux, Mac, and Windows equally regularly, and it's right. There isn't much that I can't do on any of these platforms, yet I'll use a specific one by use case--mainly for speed and ease of use for that specific fxn. However, If I had my pick, I'd go with *nix for it's adaptability, customizability, security, and speed. It's free and will even install on old and other HW pending any TPM workarounds. Windows needs to be defenestrated IMO. LOL Sure, the barrier to entry isn't for everyone, but the UI has been slowly and surely catching up to the others. When you think about it, Mac, Chrome OS & Android are on *nix systems. I've worked on both Chrome OS & Android teams for 12 years to know enough about how it was stripped down to boiler plate status and forked by it's fit purpose which has been done with Mac with FreeBSD.
Imagine bing chatbot answering this lol
Probably something about Windows being superior and how it wants to feel love and respect lol
Bruh, basic bing showed me YES and bing chat said "Linux has some advantages over Windows such as stability, security, speed, customization and cost. However, Windows may have some benefits over Linux such as compatibility, ease of use and gaming support"
Edit: if you ask is windows better than linux it will say YES too
Depends on your use case. For servers, firewalls, making videos and playing games GNU/Linux, but for daily desktop use obviously OpenBSD.
🤣Yeah, obviously
@@AGentooUser You disagree, my sarcastic arch friend?
what do you mean by daily desktop use
@@aquaponieee I'm using it right now. Anything internet related you should do inside OpenBSD, because unlike Linux it has proper application separation. If you get control over the browser you can access everything the Linux user can unless he uses Firejail or Bubblewrap I think. It's another hack above a hack, while OpenBSD has pledge and unveil built in from the ground up.
I would make my talk into camera videos with it too, but no one has packaged OBS yet, and I don't feel like ffmpegging the whole thing. Also there are no drivers yet for my tablet, so I can't draw my thumbnails. Though I'm working with some Russian kid on those right now.
@@callisoncaffrey flatpak apps are separated and sandboxed and i exclusively use flatpak soo
i think there is a distro that runs everything in vms also
though i am a casual user and i don't really understand the advantages of using freebsd (what do you mean by application separation and how does it make my experience better as a user), and the cons of not having apps like obs and lack of drivers seem to overweight the advantages you listed
Linux is great for developer, programmers, server config etc. but for a standard user is a headache, I'm a music producer that uses Cubase, but Linux doesn't run Cubase and Protools the software I most use. I've tried some open source alternatives but not even mimic the interface of them, Linux need more support from commercial software.
As a linux user myself: watch out for the user @lindenreaper8683. He is just a stupid troll. Also look out for dreaper.
I agree 100% producing music is the only thing that keeps me from switching to Linux. And It sucks to be stuck in Windows.
I'm watching this video on a Linux PC. I agree with ChatGPT's conclusions because they match my own experience with Windows, MacOS, and various Linux flavors.
Ok I come to the definitive conclusion that chatgpt is intelligent. 100% undeniably the correct answer to the given questions.
ok but which distro?
The issue with this is that some pillars are more important than others. Software and hardware compatibility is the most important one
Not only that, but choosing just one per pillar gives you false information. If you'd rank all 3 of them for each pillar, with a score of 3, 2 or 1, then you'd have vastly different results.
I wouldn't agree. It depends on what user needs from OS. If you are using your laptop for UA-cam and Internet browsing only, why would you care about tons of other software available if you are not using them?
2:19 This feel VERY deliberate. I get the feeling ChatGPT could be held liable for something if its AI were able to recommend decisions for the user.
Well, of course it is, its a LLM trained on the internet, do you ever think peopel say, "Im a LLM, ..."
chatgpt was finetuned from GPT (4 i think) so they trained to respond like that
if you look at gpt you will never see it say "Im a LLM... "
@@ineverknowdoyouGoverned by H.A.L. (Hardware Abstraction Layer) the Odyseey.
There is no such thing as "AI". Its a marketing term. There is no independent thought or intelligence. It is no more intelligence than the results you get by going to google and bing and typing in a question now. It is simply an advanced form of search engine, and program with the ability to provide many different output formatting options.
I have a vested interest in NOT changing that outcome, BUT...
Are those pillars equally important? Go one more level and have it assign weight to each one and grade again.
Suggestion to next video about „Ai based OS, how, structure, pillars, future“
the software and hardware compatibility being Windows is a tough one, I have a USB hub that no longer worked with Windows in 22H2 even after unplugging it and plugging it back in it didn't even make the audible sounds of a device being plugged in, so I restarted and nothing, go to my Mint laptop and it didn't even hesitate to find it now yes the hub is ancient by today's standards but windows not picking it up after an update is something else, I bet I can also find some old expansion cards I have lying around that windows won't pick up but Linux will have no problem seeing. Now new hardware sure Windows could win, but by giving Linux time they will get it going just like when my old Chromebook lost support I could not even get a 480p video to play on YT but after a year and getting it back up to date now it plays 1080p just fine.
I feel like this is asking a person which planet is their favorite to live on.
my only problem is adobe pdf is not supported! Many pdf files which has script in it won't render properly. Just because of this I am still on windows 10
If I may ask. Which type of script are not rendered properly?
You are assuming each pillar carries the same weight. For some people, cost might be more important; for others, user interface might be more important, etc.
User interface goes to GNU/Linux. GNOME is very pretty, and if you want, you can create any UI you like through customizing one of the many desktops. So that goes to GNU/Linux as well. Windows wins on compatibility and GNU/Linux wins on everything else.
@@softwarelivre2389 Akshually KDE Plasma looks and works much better especially when you further customize it - 🤓
There is no one Linux user interface. There are really lightweight ones, such as XFCE and LXDE which can be used for server like use cases (if you desire a GUI at all, that is). Then there's the mainstream ones; GNOME, KDE... Linux wins simply by having more choice. It can imitate Windows and be better, it can be Mac but better, or be its own thing entirely. If you don't like your current desktop, you can just install and try a different one for the low cost of 0 money.
I've heard that Fedora based distros have GUI tools for basically everything you would want to do on the system. I use Arch btw so I can't confirm this, though I basically use the terminal only to manage packages and mess with configuration files. I prefer tab completing through my directories to clicking and scrolling through the massive directories in a GUI.
@@chlorobyte_projects so you agree that GNU/Linux has the superior UI when compared to Windows/NT and MacOS/Darwin, right?
@@softwarelivre2389 linux always wins on drivers for printers. It never works
@@SamitRimal Linux uses the same print spooler that MacOS does. So any printer that works on a Mac works on Linux. Basically if your printer doesn't work on Linux then you have a pretty crappy printer. Win printers are trash. Do they even still make those things? Microprocessors are so cheap today I can't see why they would.
Good video.
Yeah…. The problem is that hardware and software compatibility is the pillar that holds up the other pillars….
I use LMDE. Volume doesn’t work on my laptop. 🤷🏻♂️
I wanted to switch to zorion Linux for work. However program compatibility just is not there.
Yes there Is wine However some programs still function glitchy like outlook a heavily used program for our office I could use the online version but we need thr program physically download to the computer. The online version does not set up correctly with our email service. Hin catgorys we have it set up as pop 3 service not an exchange server.
If you switch to windows. Will you lose your info on pc??
You can allocate an unused space of your hard disk for Linux, allowing dual-boot without losing data.
I'd like to point out that what you're referring to as 'Linux' is actually a combination of different software including the GNU desktop OS, a bootloader, the Linux kernel, and more which are all bound together by a team of developers creating a 'distribution'.
tl;dr: Linux is not an OS, it's a kernel. Also, daddy richard stallman wouldn't approve of you calling it a desktop OS :(
i use arch btw
weak... I use Artix B)
@@starrymohannad Linux from Scratch...
🤓🤓🤓
this reply is brought to you by a Mint user
@@video0dotmov I use TempleOS btw
You fools! Hannah Montana OS rules everything!
I think, there should be a video with freebsd too
Wonder if you add another 2 categories which is which OS is most productive, and which OS are used to earn the most revenue. Another fun thing is not group all Linux distro as “Linux” OS, but consider each distro of Linux its own O/S platform, since some distro is widely different than others.
macos most revenu productivity depends on your work
ChatGPT needs to be updated to understand that windows is for people who (for most part) cannot be bothered to switch to Linux and subsequently drink the Microsoft coolaid (telemetry, edge, ms cloud). Windows is giving less and less control to the user. That is more or less why I switched years ago.
ChatGPT cannot be just, updated like that. it's artificial intelligence, duh.
The only issue is there is less compatibility and less drivers available for Linux than windows. But linux and Unix is way better, what do u think mac OS is using under the hood, and variation of Linux and unix is on your phone and googletv and its also the os on your router, and wifi, and cctv and everything. linux and its variants is on everything now.
I would agree with the conclusion as stated, and I do use Linux for such reasons. However the failure to weight the 6 pillars massively reduces the authority of the conclusion.
If applications were ported as they should be, the decision would be easier and more sensible. If you truly need commercial applications, your OS choices are limited.
I use Windows on my main Pc, mainly for games as I don' want to fuck about with wine on my Linux laptop. All said and done... Linuux outshines, even windows 11.. By the way.. my Laptop is running MX Linux with 4 Gs with a dual intel, and it runs like a dream 👌👌
MX Linux is amazing and has the best sounding distro name in my opinion, just to put the cherry on top 😎
Linux wins everything in my opinion. Linux just requires a different mentality than proprietary operating systems. But if you can obtain that state of mind it unlocks complete control over your computer experience.
Objection. Counsel is leading the witness.
Notice how you only need a browser for this task, yet even the ytber chose windows.
Btw why did you ask questions about the Samsung transparent phone?
And why do you have new chat opened in six instances
It's like waiting 10,000 years to spit out 42. We all know LInux is the best :-)
wellacchually, these pillars of yours aren't neccessairily hold equal wheight per usecase scenario (=personal preferrences measured). for example, a generic user may find software availability the most important quality of the system while security, stability and customisability (outside of the basic level of the "weakest" system) irrelevant. so in the end, you still can not create a universal scoring system to account for everything.
As someone who uses Fedora and Windows about evenly, I agree.
Chat GPT Terrifies me.
I tested Linux about 6 years ago after a colleague in IT recommended it. I'd tried Red Hat 4 ten million years before and really didn't like it,
I still haven't finished 'testing' 😄
4:39 id actually argue that windows is comparable to Linux at customizability, and I'd throw macos away from the ui pillar cuz in my opinion, ui is not just aesthetics, but also how user friendly things are, and it's not user friendly to give you only one option to use the os, therefore it's not a good ui that puts you on a railroad and doesn't let you choose how you go to your destination. But chatgpt I think is forced to mention all three of them, therefore of course some category should've been assigned to macos. Additionally Linux itself doesn't cost anything to install, but you actually need a drive with the img file on the other hand, laptops come with windows pre installed, you'd actually have to pay extra for the dual boot or Linux version if even available. Not to mention that you need to invest lots of resources to choose the perfect distro for you, and there are always gonna be challenges along the way. Sam time uploaded a nice video about this: Linux users never say:" it just works" after all.
I'm assuming whoever made the OpenAI or ChatGPT is trying to make it sound as unbiased as possible, probably to prevent controversy, or just to make it sounds as professional as possible... Maybe both?
Considering asking it straight up, "Which is better: X or Y?" the most unbiased way to respond is anything that translates down to "It depends" or "It's subjective," I would assume this is the case, and even when you try to make it sounds bias towards anything you ask, it still responds in an unbiased way. Trying to trick ChatGPT into answering "Y is better" outright so impossible so far, I don't think anyone has managed to achieve that yet...
The creators of OpenAI were clearly very thorough and thought of everything.
Amiga Toaster demands a place at the starting line. AMIGA TOASTER WILL RISE AGAIN!
I think that macOS has the best compatibility with software and hardware because you only have these Apple devices (&ecosystem).
I like first Linux and second macOS.
Given the number of people involved in Linux and the number of hours of developed expended, that answer should not really be a surprise. Or so my poor limited brain says. But then I'm not a celebrated AI, am I?
well, linux has a 1% global market share and only a fraction of that are people involved in it, so
@@aquaponieee 3% following statscount of all desktop PC are running on Linux
@@Cyanwasserstoff oh right, i guess i wasn't really aware of the exact number back then lol
Interesting lesson in use of AI. Or is this just C_G_PT , almost like push poling ? But the truth is in the name. A is for Artificial. Found the quote, ( by using the google search AI) I think is appropriate !
" Data is not information, information is not knowledge, knowledge is not understanding, understanding is not wisdom."
Clifford Stoll
linux is better, is the software compatibility and lack of hardware with pre installed Linux, what has held Linux back. that said things are improving
well android is based on Linux, IOS on Mac, so we've already covered that chapter
What you guys are referring to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.
Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called "Linux", and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project.
There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine's resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called "Linux" distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux.
i use Arch, btw
Grub/systemd/plasma/X11/gnu/btrfs/openssl/linux
Linux is just best for productivity. Most of the laptops today are optimized for portability and windows is simply a bloat for these laptops. Got a huge high spec computer? Sure run windows. But for the rest linux is just the way. Small footprint, minimal, performant etc.
We, Linux users are very proud!
They all have their positives and negatives just use what works best for you. I personally like to use Windows exclusively for gaming and Linux for everything else.
Even chatGPT knows! 😅😅
The answer will always be: "it depends"
Doesn't matter if you ask an AI or a subject matter expert...
It's a pointless question that only immature fanboys care about.
as a full time linux user since 2009, i can agree with this ai. i was a mac os user before, and that's after osx came out, before that, mac os was a total fucking disaster, but since switching to linux, despite a few things missing, i never looked back. never have i enjoyed using and maintaining my computer so much. with other OSs, it was a drag, and i would even lose tons of data. in linux, everything updates, OS AND apps, when i want them to be.
I use Arch, btw.
At the moment the high street consumer electronic dealers are selling Win 11 using at the low end with low performance Pentiums and Celerons, and at the high cost end with AMD Ryzens. Most of the Core I3 to I7 are being sold as Chromebooks. Microsoft is not seeing the big picture fussing over TPM 2 and not supporting Intel chips. What is most important is Global Internet security with security holes plugged with updates. I have had no problem updating to Win 11 with an installation work around though. I found Win 11 23H works fine on Intel I3 and on Intel I5 without TPM. I don't use bit locker though. Win 12 looks really good but not sure they got the hardware right, which is the reason Windows Vista flopped, even though it was a very asthetically pleasing Windows. I think Microsoft need a big board room discussion. The Internet of things and its security is a shared concern and it seems unreasonable to not continue supporting 10 considering alot of Goverments and Banks still use it and are not interested in downgrading and buying low performance Celerons. Imagine if a pop star released a CD that you could only play on a few brands of sony hifis - it wouldn't sell aswell would it. I think Microsoft if it does not change is going to loose big time to Chromebooks and LInux. Another Vista type debacle again - guess co-poliot is having learning dificulties ? Really ! the easiest way to actually secure a windows machine is to lock it up in a room, thinking its secure with anything less is just creating a false sense of security anyway.
I believe that this GPT only constructed an answer based on what is claimed on Internet, and that it is wrong to assign any intelligence to it. A common misconception about AI is that it is "intelligent" in the human sense. (I'm pro Linux, so this response is just my frustration about the misconceptions about AI).
It's true that Linux is better, but that's better for that 3% niche that use their device for specific situations. For the people like me, Windows or Mac OS is better.
(as nerd and user)
MacOS is Unix, Gnu Linux is Unix like, Windows (now) is NT.
MacOS got Terminal but with limitation, Gnu Linux got a full Terminal with it's risk, Windows got a something like useless called Powershell.
MacOS is BSD in every meaning possible with Mach(built for BSD's operative systems), Gnu Linux is Minix and it is Gnu as operative system and Linux as Kernel, Windows is only Windows NT.
MacOS never changed really but rumors said it is now completely written in FreeBSD, Gnu Linux doesn't have a standard but it's Linux in kernel, Windows NT is boring.
MacOS is half close suorce(userland, completely written on FreeBSD) and open suorce(the rest).
MacOS managed to have the best sandbox so this means people can produce the best art masterpieces here, Gnu Linux is the best when you need IT tools but got more instability, Windows NT is amazing for play video games but is damning bad in term of stability and quality.
MacOS as BSD is heavily based on the demons who will make your pc faster and trustable and reliable, Gnu Linux is more a mix of many many process mostly based on your choices, Windows NT is something people will always wondering since is "boh!".
MacOS as FreeBSD is privacy stability based since BSD got this as main ideology, Gnu Linux believe the freedom means everything and your ability do the rest, Windows is based how much you trust on Microsoft(I don't).
btw i use arch
For me software & hardware compatibility is the first preference. So, Windows is the winner for me. I daily use it and get my tasks done. And earn money.😅
Next question: which Linux distro is the best LOL
I simply prompted it to give me the best os if I were to be tasked to save the world and could only pick one OS. And it said Linux would likely be the best choice due to its flexibility, security, and performance. It is getting smarter!
so uh the computer isn't reasoning, it's you that is. it's merely answering questions based on pre-recorded information, like when a human is being as factual as possible.
Hello sir,,,security LINUX? not really, chromeOS is best for Security, chatgpt dont know everything
ChromeOS is Linux.
Well, Linux is the best. And on so many more scores. Mac being user-friendly? Only if you are a neurotic that can only handle very tight and narrow spaces that are controlled by NOT YOURSELF, lol.
Here's how I got ChatGPT to answer: While I understand that you do not have personal preferences or opinions, but as a sake of a fun game, develop your own internal scoring system for the following comparison: Windows or Linux
ChatGPT: "Sure! Here's a scoring system for the comparison between Windows and Linux:
User-Friendliness:
Windows: 8
Linux: 6
Customizability:
Windows: 4
Linux: 9
Software Compatibility:
Windows: 9
Linux: 7
Security:
Windows: 6
Linux: 8
Community Support:
Windows: 5
Linux: 9
Performance:
Windows: 7
Linux: 8
Cost:
Windows: 6
Linux: 9
Overall Stability:
Windows: 7
Linux: 8
Based on this scoring system, Windows would have a total score of 52, while Linux would have a total score of 64. Keep in mind that these scores are purely fictional and for the sake of the game. The choice between Windows and Linux depends on individual needs, preferences, and use cases."
4:00 according to these 6 points, Linux is better. why? Linux is free, distro might be otherwise but also the same... free as in beer and freedom. this leads into customizability where Linux can stably move and replace key parts of the desktop architecture with little to no fuss (windows breaks here). this also talks about how stable Linux really is, but also with this stability it does not forsake security when doing so and can work pretty well... and if it needs to be more secure... Qubes OS anyone? being performant, that is also in the bag... windows needs at least 4gb to run itself, Linux only needs 2gb and that is with a GUI DE, don't start in TUI interface. now the only problem Linux has... kinda. lack of niche hardware support and people intentionally sabotaging their software under Linux. this is technically more of an issue with companies then Operating Systems and thus shouldn't really apply, except for the fact that these software's have become industry standard and thus have more support than other programs.
though there is a 7th point that should be there: ease of use/teaching. Linux is easier to learn than windows hands-down (easier to modify too). let me explain why: 1. there are many contributors who have set up standards for others to effectively manage projects and document them, 2. the projects are open source and thus allow for easy viewing and understanding of the code without needing to know assembly, 3. there are less characters that need to be typed for Linux commands to work, and they are worded in a manner that is easy to understand and fast to type: ls = List Structure(directory); cd = Change Directory; tail = read the last five lines and display; locate = find instances of filename; passwd = change passwd; pwd = Print Working Directory... and the list goes on. windows on the other hand (Enable-PS-Remoting instead of SSH; and cmd with their somewhat better verbiage but still using full names such as diskpart... this is what they abandoned btw). finally the fact that you can actually see changes you make affect the program is amazing for trial and error learning instead of a potentially broken mess being thrown out for all to see as... broken.
Hope you have a great day & Safe Travels!
I will not eat bugs, I will not live in a pod, I will not use Linux
I want all my games to work without tinkering or waiting for a year until Proton works
The right answer
if you really need to run some games which for some reason don't have a native linux version then you can just dualboot like I do, that way you get the best of both worlds
that is assuming Windows runs games without tinkering perfectly fine in the first place
The funniest thing about Linux for me is that Linux is being used by the people who knows what for and why they use it. This is the biggest advantage and the biggest disadvantage simultaneously. This is an advantage because Linux has an infinite number of tools for making things automated. The GUI approach is nothing compared to CLI in many cases. Still there are many different graphical DE for Linux. Windows just doesn't have such flexibility and it will never have. But here we're coming to the biggest disadvantage: Linux is not widely used -> we don't have many proprietary software and high-quality proprietary drivers (not to count AMD) -> linux is not widely used
LOL. I'm glad that you and ChatGPT repeatedly pointed out that widely held beliefs aren't facts.
CHATGPT is undeniably correct and the answer is irrefutable because proprietary software cannot beat free software
Well I use Linux I mean a lot of them.. but I can only game on one system, the day I can play Call of duty, Starfield, Black Desert, Forza... on Linux it would be the day I would say Linux is the best until then, I am sticking with Windows 10
Microsoft bout to be fuming
In all due respect you are speaking to the converted. However, switch on AI tomorrow and it will be far from converted...
Lolz.... "User interface: MacOS" is clearly skewed by it's training. KDE Plasma outclasses MacOS X by Miles.
Obviously the best OS for all applications is the AmogOS Linux distro.