Intro to Sedevacantism for Normies
Вставка
- Опубліковано 20 сер 2024
- Thank you for supporting Scholastic Answers
Intro to Sedevacantism for Normies
Click the join button above to get all your livestream questions answered.
FURTHER RESOURCES
To get Tutoring: www.christianb...
Annotated Thomist: www.christianb...
SPONSOR
Use the code “Militant” for 20% off to learn Greek here: fluentgreeknt....
MUSIC
• Song of Kings - Clamav...
• Solemn Mass in Thanksg...
SUPPORT
Subscribe: / @militantthomist
Become a Patron: / militantthomist
Donate: www.paypal.com...
SusbscribeStar: www.subscribes...
FOLLOW
Discord: / discord
Website: www.christianb...
Facebook: / militantthomist
Facebook Group: / 543689120339579
Twitter: / militantthomist
Instagram: / militantthomist
WATCH
/ @militantthomist
LISTEN
Podcast: www.christianb...
Spotify: open.spotify.c...
Apple Podcasts: podcasts.apple...
Anchor: anchor.fm/mili...
SHOP
Book Store: www.christianb...
Mug: www.redbubble....
Sede Picante- The Seat is Spicy.
😵😵😵
so we meet
@@enslavedbytruth this will be a crazy fight
@@SedePicante Lmaooo
Sedevacringism: the heresy which posits that the individual has the right to judge whether any given pope is legitimate depending on how much he makes that individual cringe.
We don’t make legal judgements, research thesis of cassiciacum.
You're inferring that the pope is extremely cringe. The real question is, should the pope be cringe at all?
@YAJUN YUAN We would have to explore the nature of cringe. I think cringe is somewhat the opposite of hope and joy. So no, not at all.
@@lkae4 What does that to do with the authority Christ gave this office? It isn't based on your liking or disliking of someone.
@@skmcee7863 Well, first of all, "bro Peter" isn't actually a brother, because that would require him to be recognized by a religious community and be under obedience to a superior. If he was a religous superior that would require him to be under obedience to the Holy See, or the Local Ordinary. He has none of these. He isn't recognized by any religious superior, and he isn't under obedience to the local ordianary, all of which would be required for him to be religously professed.
If you don’t want to give pope Francis a big hug then you’re not on the team
So true. He reminds me of my great grandfather
I’m not a Francis fan….at…all, but I would still kneel and kiss his ring if I met him in person.
Amen. Viva il papa.
@YAJUN YUAN The papacy is the principle of unity in the Church
@Roman Catholic The Catholic Church does not teach that God picks the Pope. That is so cringe.
Thank you Christian.
there are sedes at my sspx who receive communion and the priest knows about them
The priest shouldn't give Communion to them. They should be kicked out. Keep telling the priest and if he doesn't stop giving Communion to them then report him.
@@jackthayer1289 report the priest to who? the society is not structured so formally and the bishop isnt really in charge as much as a figurehead. the whole authority they have is a voluntary one
@@jstevo1349 I would say the bishop, or leave that parish. That priest is an insult to the society.
@@ShaNaNa242 Well, that's ironic, because the society is an insult to the Chruch.
Based
how long have you been Catholic?
The literary pronunciation in English of "between scylla and charybdis" which in this context is what is intended is sill-ah and kar-ib-duhs
True. Wrapped Around Your Finger by the Police has it as a lyric for reference
Very useful for a neophyte (5 years) in 2024 AD.
Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a (normie) sinner.
Hi Tucker.
Which pope is in the intro
St. Pius X
What was that prayer at the beginning?
St Thomas' Prayer before study
What is the name of the intro?
@@j.athanasius9832you know the pope in the intro? I’ve been looking for his name
@@thedarkwolf3047Pope St Pius X : probably the best pope since St Peter.
Looks like free content for me
I love Pope Francis.
lawl
The fatima double is legit !!!!!!!
How is Francis not a manifest heretic? What’s the argument?
1) he hasn't taught heresy. 2) he would have to be repeatedly warned by the college of cardinals for directly, publicly, doing so that has not occured. 3) He would have to be denounced and judged by a later Pontiff. NONE OF THOSE THINGS HAVE OCCURED.
@@michaelspeyrer1264 according to who? He’s taught heresy therefore he’s a heretic. This isn’t a novel take.
@@michaelspeyrer1264Francis professes the following:
All men are saved, the Quoron is a holy book, Martin Luther had good intentions on justification, there are non-Catholic saints, homosexual "marriage" is acceptable, it is a grave sin to convince people of the Catholic faith.
Cum Ex Apostolatus Officio #6:
“ In addition, if ever at any time it should appear that any Bishop (even one acting as an Archbishop, Patriarch or Primate), or any Cardinal of said Roman Church, even a Legate as previously stated, or *even a Roman Pontiff prior to his promotion or elevation as Cardinal or Roman Pontiff, has deviated from the Catholic Faith or fallen into some heresy, then his promotion or elevation, even if it be uncontested and carried out by the unanimous assent of all the Cardinals, shall be null, invalid, and void…”*
“...each and every one of their statements, deeds, enactments and administrative acts, howsoever made, as well as anything that ensues therefrom, shall be devoid of force, and shall confer absolutely no legal privilege or right on anyone; and those thus promoted and elevated shall automatically and *without need of a further declaration* be deprived of any dignity, position, honor, title, authority, office and power.”
Notice there is no need for any further declaration. No future council is necessary to depose an antipope.
There isn't any real argument, it's too obvious for those who do enough research. The Francis splainers are just coping
you have to make the argument for him being a heretic homie
sup
The Bishops are corrupt, so now what...
Then Jesus lied. Christ's Church has fallen.
Could you talk about the infaillibility of canonisations ?
That would be fun...I'm of the opinion that they are infallible. It's the clear consensus of the theologians.
@@MilitantThomist I have some real issues with some recent canonizations... Like the one of Paul VI. How could a pope this damaging to the Church be a saint ? Not judging about his private life but just what he did as a pope.
@@MyOrder66 Totally get that, I as well have had my private struggles, but, I think its valid to reduce the object of the infallibility of canonizations to them having the beatific vision, and not necessarily to other marks that SHOULD be present in a canonization.
@@MilitantThomist that could be an explanation, but is there any traditional ground to separating in a canonization process being in heaven (infaillible) and having displayed heroic virtues (non-infaillible)? It would still mean that some canonizations can be scandalous because of the unworthiness of the recipient (albeit in heaven).
@@MyOrder66 Traditionally, it wasn't treated. For example, The Catholic Encyclopedia states "What is the object of this infallible judgment of the pope? Does he define that the person canonized is in heaven or only that he has practiced Christian virtues in an heroic degree? I have never seen this question discussed; my own opinion is that nothing else is defined than that the person canonized is in heaven."
You can't save the Church from outside the Church. Nobody should be praying to Archbishop Lefebvre. Canonical Mission is a requirement by divine law. And not merely from ecclesiastical law.
Many diocese list the SSPX on their websites as a Catholic Organization.
wag
Sunday is never a fast day. Only the pagans fast on sundays.
It is permissible to fast on sunday
This is like saying, "Sunday is never a day to show your love for the true God because pagans show love for their pagan gods on Sundays".
Also like saying, "Hitler breathed air on Sunday, therefore, Christians breathing air on Sunday is wrong".
Why is it so hard for so many to see the world today and realize we are in the end times? Thats the real question.
The Catholics who lived through the plague have the right to laugh with scorn at wippy catholics that think this is a rough patch by comparision.
@@michaelspeyrer1264the saints wouldn't laugh at those who are suffering.
Just because the suffering of this day is of a different character, doesn't mean it has no value.
@@michaelspeyrer1264 Well I would say that the lack of faith we see today was not present during the plague. Although it was certainly macabre
@@michaelspeyrer1264If you have not noticed we are in the End Times merely by instict than you are just blind. Spiritual death is much more dangerous than physical one.
Everyone always thinks they're living in the end times.
If the bishops have to declare the pope a heretic to depose him, but the bishops are heretics themselves, how could the papacy ever heal? The bishops would only support the heresy continuously
You are assuming that heretical bishops exist in a number that outnumber those true to the faith.
The spiritual blindness and refusal to see what is in plain sight is great with you. You don't need any mental gymnastics now it is rigjt in front of your face.
Your comment isn’t very compelling.
Oh shit, you're right. Time to trust you over Jesus and jump ship.