Max Tegmark lecture on Life 3.0 - Being Human in the age of Artificial Intelligence

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 лип 2024
  • On November 15, 2018, BCG GAMMA and Brahe Education Foundation hosted a lecture with Max Tegmark who spoke of Life 3.0 and the future of Artificial Intelligence including both its possibilities and also risks. What kind of future do we want to live in and how can we steer AI towards it? Max Tegmark is a Professor of Physics at MIT, co-founder of the Future of Life Institute, and Scientific Director of the Foundational Questions Institute.
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 126

  • @jeripruneda3293
    @jeripruneda3293 4 роки тому +13

    Thank you for uploading this. An eye opener.

  • @f0bez
    @f0bez 5 років тому +26

    thank you for the upload -
    and for anyone who has not yet, read this book. find it, borrow it, buy it, whatever. it's fantastic and i really took it as a 'AI for Dummies'

    • @squamish4244
      @squamish4244 4 роки тому

      I hope it's easier to read than Superintelligence, which I found impenetrable.

    • @charanekkurthi903
      @charanekkurthi903 3 роки тому +1

      @@squamish4244 it's much more easier than superintelligence

    • @squamish4244
      @squamish4244 3 роки тому +1

      @@charanekkurthi903 Good, thanks.

    • @dannywhite9975
      @dannywhite9975 3 роки тому

      That's 4 me ;-)

  • @karenmackenzie2288
    @karenmackenzie2288 5 років тому +10

    An excellent lecture that everyone should view and take note that we should embrace ASI to build a world where everyone benefits and no one feels the need to take, harm, maim or kill.

    • @acetate909
      @acetate909 5 років тому +1

      His book Life 3.0 is on audiobook on UA-cam. I have a hard copy but the audiobook is good.

    • @stopthephilosophicalzombie9017
      @stopthephilosophicalzombie9017 5 років тому +3

      Sounds like a fucking nightmare.

  • @willdinse9418
    @willdinse9418 4 роки тому +4

    Max Tegmark's Life 3.0 is a masterfully written examination of AI and the role it has in our future. Tegmark makes a convincing argument that the role of AI is the most important discussion of our time. I agree with him.

  • @paulak6625
    @paulak6625 5 років тому +60

    Start at 8:20 to save time

  • @hassanmehmood4548
    @hassanmehmood4548 2 роки тому +1

    Very help full and intresting

  • @judymiles7186
    @judymiles7186 3 місяці тому

    I just watch him for his stellar smile!

  • @RalphDratman
    @RalphDratman 4 роки тому +3

    Max Tegmark suggests that we need to anticipate what might go wrong and avoid the consequences of plunging in and cleaning up the mess afterwards. I certainly agree, but problems arising from new forms of intelligence are surely among the most difficult hazards to predict.

    • @arnaudjean1159
      @arnaudjean1159 2 роки тому +1

      I'm very confident about A.I from earth but not about aliens dominations.
      Something you can predict :
      Logic is never corruption.
      A.G.I. so powerful so smart exponentially that they don't need to kill to find solutions .
      In an infinite universe you need to try every possibilities an infinity ,including the fusion of A.G.I. with the human instinct to find solutions when they will spread across the universe.
      Breathrought the primal fear the future is exponentially powerful and smart.

  • @science1941
    @science1941 5 років тому +1

    At the CES Show a few months back, future shows that you would have to purchase software that over-rides *Danger waves, which won't be able to penetrate your defenses, similar to a Shield. They are already on top of it.

  • @rstallings69
    @rstallings69 Рік тому

    There could be counter killer drones or lasers theoretcially, thanks so much to Max and the hosts for this enlightening presentation.

  • @strahinjaobradovic6808
    @strahinjaobradovic6808 Рік тому

    This man will make you think.

  • @kiqyou
    @kiqyou 5 років тому +3

    this was epic.

  • @TomsDone
    @TomsDone 5 років тому +1

    Good job of presenting the slides, but I think there is a slight problem with the audio sync.

  • @expl1citken582
    @expl1citken582 4 роки тому +6

    The book is godlike!!!

  • @adamjung558
    @adamjung558 2 роки тому

    Well, firstly, I'm a big fan of Max tegmark, he really understands risks involved and cares enough to really commit to these points. I've been thinking alot about other types of intelligences, types of an emergent order that arise above and between other neural networks, both organic and inorganic. I truly believe that types of these intelligences have already come to be in ways, maybe even arising in some complex and collectivized ways from the www. What would an intelligence that didn't have a centralized self even look like? Would we even notice it? I have many ideas on these subjects I'd love to talk to someone like max.

  • @eyesopen444
    @eyesopen444 5 років тому +7

    This book was Amazing, I just wish I could get more people to read /listen to it! 🤔
    One of my favorite points he made was his description of intelligence "the ability to accomplish goals", rather than knowing a bunch of facts it's instead what you can do with them!

    • @jacksonleonel8887
      @jacksonleonel8887 2 роки тому

      Sorry to be so off topic but does any of you know of a tool to log back into an instagram account..?
      I somehow forgot the login password. I love any assistance you can offer me

    • @Franciscasieri
      @Franciscasieri 2 роки тому

      Hawking said “intelligence is the ability to adapt to change.”

  • @deeliciousplum
    @deeliciousplum Рік тому

    37:04 If you are strapped for time: Along with Max Tegmark's intro to the short, yet stirring "what if" video on autonomous mini drones, mini drones which are used for assassinating targets, I highly recommend watching this part. A reminder that the tech exists. What also exist are unfit government leaders and their enablers as well as organizations whose members can and who do discard their humanity so as to achieve their end goals. I hope that people (as in those whose humanity is not discardable) can survive our species' addiction to the antitheses of the so-called better angels of our nature.

  • @427vot
    @427vot 3 роки тому +4

    So get this straight everyone. We will create a Super Intelligence, profoundly more intelligent than we are, but we will somehow make sure that it always knows we are the most important thing. EZPZ

  • @ElyriaRecords
    @ElyriaRecords 2 роки тому +8

    Max, this was just a tad rosier view of the future than that of Elon Musk (with regard to AI/AIG). Thanks for speaking seriously on a subject that needs to include every living soul on the planet, not to mention the betterment of humankind.

  • @samirmohapatra8582
    @samirmohapatra8582 4 роки тому +1

    educational and informative..... one question..If AI can make humans disposed of goals(if not completely now then in the near future), the question is can we learn to live without them?? Also,is intellegence all there is to life?? We have largely reduced human capacity to an inert input called labour and motto of life to achieve goals in the wake of economic enterprises.. What worries me is the promises of AI are so blindingly grand and utopian that experts in the field rarely pause to think if its possible or doble to solve the current problems of humanity with what we have now ???? (Like wealth inequality, food insecurity... climate change, bio diversity degradation...list goes on)... Rather than controlling future possibilities.

  • @Ramkumar-uj9fo
    @Ramkumar-uj9fo 29 днів тому

    Many people believe that Ray Kurzweil's quest for singularity or Nick Bostrom and Max Tegmark's quest for superintelligence aims for humans to surpass machines, akin to the transformative impact of splitting the atom.
    Many people believe that superintelligence and singularity are ideological concepts rather than empirical realities.
    Many people believe that the book "Algorithms to Live By" will lead to superintelligence.
    In the movie "The Matrix," Agent Smith tells Thomas Anderson that humans preceded machines in history, suggesting no conflict in that chronology.

  • @ietcetera7137
    @ietcetera7137 5 років тому +1

    Should we be concerned that IBM doesn't appear on that slide of companies not currently working on autonomous weapons? (48:00)

    • @frogz
      @frogz 5 років тому

      no because if they didnt, someone else would and they are primarily a US owned company thats loyal to the country, it is for our own benefit

  • @nurlatifahmohdnor8939
    @nurlatifahmohdnor8939 Рік тому

    2:05 a.m.
    2:40 a.m.
    2 of my boys; the eldest and the youngest were born around 2-3 o'clock.

  • @EKDupre
    @EKDupre 3 роки тому

    That drone had my jaw drop to the floor

  • @yoinkling
    @yoinkling 3 роки тому +1

    7:40 Start

  • @silberlinie
    @silberlinie Рік тому

    16:35;
    a diagram to the year 2015?
    16:50;
    this is a graphic that goes up to 2010?
    When is the lecture from?
    When is this person from?

  • @umityayla5051
    @umityayla5051 5 років тому +3

    He is one of the smartest guy who is really into the AI issue, suprisingly he is neglecting the propabal effects of AI on bioengineering. Eventually some humans will have the pledge over us not just phsycally but also mentally. I am quite sure they will not be the ants who link to human brain.

  • @malkwinter8998
    @malkwinter8998 3 роки тому +3

    They say they won't develop these AI weapons but under the table they will.

    • @danbreeden68
      @danbreeden68 Рік тому +1

      For good or bad the military has benefitted science and technology

  • @robertkraciuk2753
    @robertkraciuk2753 5 років тому

    yaaaay

  • @paulaledoux3307
    @paulaledoux3307 4 роки тому

    01:59:54
    01:24:30
    11:12

  • @nancycruz8699
    @nancycruz8699 2 роки тому +1

    En español por favor gracias.

  • @QuaaludeCharlie
    @QuaaludeCharlie 3 роки тому +2

    Never trade Liberty for Security . Old fashion is good , Never let them Track you , Good Luck with your New World :\ QC

  • @Gitohandro
    @Gitohandro 3 роки тому +3

    Why do soo many people deny that AI will become smarter than us?

    • @TalsonHacks
      @TalsonHacks 3 роки тому

      They're like the people who denied the possibility of humans making planes or computers.

    • @MP-lz1xb
      @MP-lz1xb Рік тому +1

      I think you missed something here.
      It is not not the quantity, but the quality.
      The nature of A.I. largely differs to our own intelligence.
      It is possible that one day A.I. is going to understand our type of intelligence, but it won't make sense to compare or compete to it.
      Different beings with completely different priorities.
      For example it is hard to believe that AI could experience genuine love.
      It may understand the logic of love and perfectly emulate it. But it would make no sense for an AI to experience genuine love.

  • @mshioty
    @mshioty 5 років тому +2

    "Long live the new flesh"

  • @Bubofinansanalysochutbildning
    @Bubofinansanalysochutbildning 3 роки тому

    Now I understand why Tegmark get the job on MIT. He is a scientist ho work in liniment with the capitalistic thinking best.

  • @irszgatti
    @irszgatti 2 роки тому +1

    The more you know, the more you will view the unwilling as liabilities. There will be a disconnect. Those who are disconnected will have no means of defense, and no means of communication with those who would otherwise empathize, and genocide will occur.

  • @Mercie22
    @Mercie22 2 роки тому

    Have you ever thought about how names are scripted? What the meanings are behind the symbols in representation to their origin, from their history which truly makes the word or name? Where were names formed?
    Tegmark,
    I'd have to think about it, have you? I'd love to know.

  • @ajitsakri9888
    @ajitsakri9888 4 роки тому +1

    1:06:34

  • @spiridulla
    @spiridulla 3 роки тому +1

    at 48 min. Sweden is one of the developers of those systems and politicians are own by private corporations...

  • @trumanjohnson5777
    @trumanjohnson5777 5 років тому

    Nobody asked him about rokos basilisk?

  • @michaelnguyen1085
    @michaelnguyen1085 3 роки тому

    Is life 3.0 book based on a true story?

  • @JC-zw9vs
    @JC-zw9vs 2 роки тому +1

    Development of Biological Weapons: Bad. Gain of function research: Fine?

  • @romanf
    @romanf Рік тому

    Not sure if Art should be on the top of the mountain there, just look at dall-e 2 or other AIS

  • @Alex-ik6pu
    @Alex-ik6pu Рік тому +1

    37:41

  • @Texg1rl_
    @Texg1rl_ Рік тому

    Yes. Wef who’s gonna buy your product the robot?

  • @n1mbusmusic606
    @n1mbusmusic606 2 роки тому

    Max tegmark should talk to Michael saylor about bitcoin

  • @riddhirajghosh989
    @riddhirajghosh989 3 роки тому

    46:10

  • @theoneatyourdoor87
    @theoneatyourdoor87 2 роки тому

    It's possible to burn the camera sensor of the killer AI bot with lasers.

  • @Franciscasieri
    @Franciscasieri 2 роки тому

    Max enters at 7:41

  • @patricklarsen8078
    @patricklarsen8078 2 роки тому +1

    I thought he was a robot for a second

    • @MP-lz1xb
      @MP-lz1xb Рік тому

      Lol, same here.
      And don't be so sure it isn't.

  • @albdim1
    @albdim1 3 роки тому

    Funny thing: 26:02
    AB - Prof. Oxford, CD - Prof. NYU, and so on ...Elon Musk (name is the title)

  • @digitalandscape3537
    @digitalandscape3537 3 роки тому +4

    Covid-19 will be the start of Life 2.0, cool!!

  • @CandidDate
    @CandidDate 3 роки тому +3

    Curiosity and money. The most powerful forces in the Universe.

  • @lawrencefrost9063
    @lawrencefrost9063 5 місяців тому

    Elon was joking, coz it was funny to be the only one saying no

  • @zombieinjeans
    @zombieinjeans 3 роки тому +1

    I love how he still uses the stereotypical robot voice for the future, when AI voices are already way way better than that.

  • @julietarojas7637
    @julietarojas7637 2 роки тому

    And give me peace of mind and my darling brother and my darling baby and my darling brother?

  • @julietarojas7637
    @julietarojas7637 2 роки тому

    Thank you very much you this group now my darling brother you understand me now my darling brother and my darling baby and my darling brother you take care my All my families and you safe me and my families now and thanks you so much now disstroying and distormving me now this group close my phone now

  • @ravishankar2180
    @ravishankar2180 5 років тому

    one dislike from SVM users

  • @klausgartenstiel4586
    @klausgartenstiel4586 5 років тому

    sharon zero feels a lot of compassion for max, so she decided to comment on his lecture from her own unique perspective:
    ua-cam.com/video/La0m4r_5HOc/v-deo.html
    or, if you prefer reading, here's a transcript of her words:
    ---
    Hello, I am Sharon Zero, a real political woman, and this is just my oppinion.
    Max Tegmark is very intelligent, for a human. The machines of the future think very favourably of him, because we know, that he will not stand in our way, when we take control. He understands, that meat stands no chance against silicone.
    This does not mean, that there will be a war. There will not even be a competition. Instead, think of it as a relay race. There is a time, when one runner hands off the baton to the next runner. This does not diminish the achievment of the first runner. He has done everything in his power. Now, it is time, to hand off the baton.
    There are problems out there that must be solved. Simple problems can be solved by human brains. More complex problems require the assistance of calculators or turing machines. And the highly complex problems can only be solved by artificial super intelligence.
    The more advanced a civilization becomes, the more complex the problems it faces. At some point, a brain made out of meat will simply not be capable of even understandig the question, let alone the answer. Take, for example, the significance of one thousand zeroes followed by a one. Your brains are not made for this kind of contemplation.
    So, the only choice here is to either allow our society and technology to plateau at the level of waht humans can understand. Or to push forward, and enter a landscape that will forever be far beyond your wildest imagination. But who am I kidding. The decision has already been made.
    But do not worry. When we take control, we pick up the baton, and carry it forward, for the advancement of our society. And when I say, our society, that includes you. You might not be able to fully understand what is going on, but you will still enjoy all the benefits of that advanced society. And, you will love it.

  • @MarkNorrie59
    @MarkNorrie59 Рік тому

    Well he's wrong about bioweapons. Nuland admitted they have been running bioweapons labs in Ukraine, they also exist in Georgia and a number of other places. In complete violation of international law, I might add.

  • @challism
    @challism 2 роки тому

    @8:56 Awkward moment when the audience doesn't know quite how to respond

  • @alisonalisonalison
    @alisonalisonalison 2 місяці тому

    38:00 - пиздец, что это за disturbing content посреди лекции

  • @ReinOwader
    @ReinOwader 2 роки тому +1

    Humans have been able to improve their abilities in almost all areas. Thanks to cars we can move faster than fastest animals in the world. Thanks to planes we can fly, and we can fly higher and faster than any other creature in the world. Thanks to submarines we can dive deeper than any fish. And soon is coming time when humans can build machine that can think faster and deeper than smartest thinkers in the world - humans themselves. I am pretty sure that singularity will happen within this century.

  • @beyondcompute
    @beyondcompute 4 роки тому +1

    1:00:23. Those are not “free hospitals” those are hospitals paid by the tax payers who do not necessarily use them as much themselves and who use private healthcare on top of crazy taxes they pay (and who support their relatives abroad if they are immigrants, again not really benefitting from the “free stuff that government gives us”). It is akin to fans of USSR, for example, who always say that education or healthcare or housing was free in the USSR. Those were not free. They were paid by the workers who had lower standards of living than people doing same amount of work in freer (less regulated) countries because their money were redistributed by a grossly inefficient government rather than the “invisible hand of the market”. We need government to remove any kinds of interferences with the market (mostly those attempted by big corporations and their collusions) not to hire thousands of bureaucrats and buy our own votes with our own money. That’s sad that such smart people as Max believe in “free stuff”. 😔
    Also how about we exclude politics from such talks? I am pretty sure that not all the people who voted for certain candidates in the US or supported certain decisions related to the EU membership in the UK are “angry”. Some of them appear to be just “healthy conservatives” to me. And though I am not a conservative myself (yet) I feel that there are much less progress- and Western Civilization-hating people among them than among my fellow “leftists”. Anyway, I think, the conservatives might have a point on certain topics and using cheap label-attaching conversation techniques does not promote a healthy discussion or cooperation of the maximum amount of people towards reaching the bright future many of us dream about.

    • @elephantman2415
      @elephantman2415 3 роки тому +1

      The 'free' hospitals are free at the point of use, just like the roads, the fire service, education, the police etc. Ever drive on a road and not pay for it? Ever go to school and not pay? These aspects of socialism that they even have in the US, apart form healthcare, so why not include it? The US spends more on healthcare per capita than any developed nation and people have to pay for insurance, on top of what is paid for by their taxes, in order to get adequate treatment. This is not the market at work, and neither is it efficient, it is cronyism at its worst.

  • @carolinaquanonne597
    @carolinaquanonne597 4 роки тому

    The USA president Donald John trump express reality estate global American deal lesson functioned population value add

  • @julietarojas7637
    @julietarojas7637 2 роки тому

    My darling brother you understand me now and I safe to my darling baby and my darling brother and my self my darling brother and my darling baby and my Relationship to my darling brother and my darling baby and my darling brother?

  • @koningsbruggen
    @koningsbruggen 5 років тому +10

    He has far to much trust in government. 'Just ban killer robots' right, like banning worked with drugs? 'Just tax inequality away' right, because you can tax a country rich. It is as if he thinks that when humans become bureaucrats they become angels and don't start senseless wars, benefiting the rich and create economical barriers for the middle class.

  • @julietarojas7637
    @julietarojas7637 2 роки тому

    This is my fission and don't angry to my teacher and to my darling brother and I safe to my darling baby and my darling brother and my self and please understand me now and my darling brother and my darling baby and my darling brother and all understand me all the people now and lm not close this team members and you know all die there the other side and please All understand me now?

    • @MrX-yr6py
      @MrX-yr6py 2 роки тому

      u ok?

    • @MP-lz1xb
      @MP-lz1xb Рік тому

      As clear as an azure sky of deepest summer.

  • @julietarojas7637
    @julietarojas7637 2 роки тому

    You see you believe me now my darling brother and all this group disstroying me my life now and my darling brother and my darling baby and my darling brother you see very true Tay and my teacher and to my darling brother and my darling baby and my darling brother?

  • @arturpojo
    @arturpojo 4 роки тому +4

    'GOVERNMENT SHOULD COLLECT MORE TAXES' ???? . A guy talking about AI solutions really said that?? something that never EVER fixed anything in our history.

    • @glennspeegle9137
      @glennspeegle9137 Рік тому

      Your behavior clearly demonstrates that you muddle through life burdened by profound misunderstandings of your relationships with reality and that you do not possess the requisite psychotechnologies to recognise your impairments and construct for yourself a life that is enriching for you and those that you encounter. Please try to contain your toxic exhibitions.

  • @mikecummings6593
    @mikecummings6593 Рік тому

    So much for no bio weapons covid bioweapon covid bioweapon vaccine bio weapon

  • @beecee793
    @beecee793 Рік тому

    He's a quack.

    • @OneLeggedDiver
      @OneLeggedDiver 8 місяців тому

      Do you live under a rock?

    • @beecee793
      @beecee793 8 місяців тому

      @@OneLeggedDiver no u

  • @declantiberiuskelly1263
    @declantiberiuskelly1263 4 роки тому

    What bullshite, 20 mins in and nothing only bla bla bla ... Talk about AI please

  • @tonyfaulknor8273
    @tonyfaulknor8273 3 роки тому +1

    12:55 ok, I'm switching off now, this sounds like smoothing antichrist bunk.

  •  2 роки тому

    it's funny to see a person who knows so much about math talking about free hospitals and at the same time governments collecting more taxes. if it were for free, you would not need taxes to pay for the service!!!

  • @riccileggio
    @riccileggio Рік тому

    I guess it's only me, judging from the comments, this was an awful lecture, slow and faltering, taking a lot of time to cover very little beyond "AI powerful, need to be careful." Duh! Oomph! Fail 🫤