@@InfiniteNow_withSeanCrowley interpretation is like a fingerprint, it is individual to us, kind of a problem…we are still interpreting things that the ancients solved long ago…our culture has reduced us all to small minded beings which renders interpretations useless in most cases. I am certain of few things but the beauty and range of the untethered hue-man mind is amazing and so few get to enjoy that open space… I have nothing but compassion for my brothers and sisters, poor things have been lied to since the day they were born and the lies were told by our most trusted advisors…
😆 yeah, well considering it’s an ongoing unfolding we shouldn’t have too many definitive resolves until the project reaches its conclusion. Thus far its just been about recapping things as they stand scientifically. Fair way to go yet :) Re the lecture; If you really want to get a handle on that experiment, there’s a good short coarse on the Brilliant app that steps through it quite well. 👌
4:45 I am bound by no such interpretations…there is no limit to how much I don’t know and this fact disrupts the flow of “interpretation”, I cannot assign an interpretation to something unknown…
Interesting point. So what you're saying is that, if there is no limit to what is unknown then there is no way to postulate the existence of something existing beyond experience. but does this therefore prove that experience is primary?
@@InfiniteNow_withSeanCrowley personal experience is the only semi trustworthy experience worth having, I can’t have your trip and you can’t have mine. We can share similarities, should there be any, but I’m on my oath and your on yours…
@@InfiniteNow_withSeanCrowley in other words, trying to establish truth based on interpretation is like pouring a foundation of what you think is concrete, might be grey mud…
@@KatyWantsToGo@KatyWantsToGo I like that, though even if we only have a "semi-trustworthy experience", does that mean we are incapable of accessing any degree of truth beyond our immediate experience? I'm happy to be proved wrong, but I currently think that we can access broader truths so long as we analyse the nature of our experience first. For example, we experience the existence of other entities. Now this doesn't guarantee that other entities exist - I may be the only existant thing, and you may be my dream. But, nevertheless, you and those other entities within my experience still seem to have access to a knowledge that I don't. As you said, you are on your path I am on mine. So this proves (I think) that there is an aspect of reality that persists beyond my immediate expereiance. What it is may still be far from determined (maybe some other definition of mind or maybe material forces), but proving its existence is a start. Because that would mean that we establish broader truths based on interpretation. What do you think? Can you see something I've missed?
@@InfiniteNow_withSeanCrowley I think you have encapsulated the problem, and that is that absolute truth exists but all we have are opinions of it. While I have no disagreement with your “interpretation” that’s the sticky part. I can’t prove you didn’t have an “out of body” experience any more than you can prove you did… As an example, I never partook in science fiction and for whatever reason, have never been interested in tv, Hollywood or video games. As a result, I am much less likely to be duped into alternative realities or see things that are not real while on DMT for instance. I never met an alien creature, all I saw was the fallacy of death and what everything looks like with no eyes, that’s about all I can say about DMT… Any who, I really enjoy your videos, stretching the mind is second only to playing in the garden…
You are doing my head in, in a delightful way!
Thanks squire. I aim to please 🙏 But it is a fun headspace to play in - What is the "quality" of isness that lies behind interpretation? 😆
@@InfiniteNow_withSeanCrowley interpretation is like a fingerprint, it is individual to us, kind of a problem…we are still interpreting things that the ancients solved long ago…our culture has reduced us all to small minded beings which renders interpretations useless in most cases. I am certain of few things but the beauty and range of the untethered hue-man mind is amazing and so few get to enjoy that open space…
I have nothing but compassion for my brothers and sisters, poor things have been lied to since the day they were born and the lies were told by our most trusted advisors…
Good video, but the background music is a bit too loud in the mix.
Cheers for that. Very appreciated 👍I'll pull it back a bit more next time. 👌
Jeez ending on a cliffhanger. Haven't gotten through the lecture video yet 😔
😆 yeah, well considering it’s an ongoing unfolding we shouldn’t have too many definitive resolves until the project reaches its conclusion. Thus far its just been about recapping things as they stand scientifically. Fair way to go yet :)
Re the lecture; If you really want to get a handle on that experiment, there’s a good short coarse on the Brilliant app that steps through it quite well. 👌
4:45 I am bound by no such interpretations…there is no limit to how much I don’t know and this fact disrupts the flow of “interpretation”, I cannot assign an interpretation to something unknown…
Interesting point. So what you're saying is that, if there is no limit to what is unknown then there is no way to postulate the existence of something existing beyond experience. but does this therefore prove that experience is primary?
@@InfiniteNow_withSeanCrowley personal experience is the only semi trustworthy experience worth having, I can’t have your trip and you can’t have mine. We can share similarities, should there be any, but I’m on my oath and your on yours…
@@InfiniteNow_withSeanCrowley in other words, trying to establish truth based on interpretation is like pouring a foundation of what you think is concrete, might be grey mud…
@@KatyWantsToGo@KatyWantsToGo I like that, though even if we only have a "semi-trustworthy experience", does that mean we are incapable of accessing any degree of truth beyond our immediate experience? I'm happy to be proved wrong, but I currently think that we can access broader truths so long as we analyse the nature of our experience first.
For example, we experience the existence of other entities. Now this doesn't guarantee that other entities exist - I may be the only existant thing, and you may be my dream. But, nevertheless, you and those other entities within my experience still seem to have access to a knowledge that I don't. As you said, you are on your path I am on mine. So this proves (I think) that there is an aspect of reality that persists beyond my immediate expereiance. What it is may still be far from determined (maybe some other definition of mind or maybe material forces), but proving its existence is a start. Because that would mean that we establish broader truths based on interpretation. What do you think? Can you see something I've missed?
@@InfiniteNow_withSeanCrowley I think you have encapsulated the problem, and that is that absolute truth exists but all we have are opinions of it.
While I have no disagreement with your “interpretation” that’s the sticky part. I can’t prove you didn’t have an “out of body” experience any more than you can prove you did…
As an example, I never partook in science fiction and for whatever reason, have never been interested in tv, Hollywood or video games. As a result, I am much less likely to be duped into alternative realities or see things that are not real while on DMT for instance. I never met an alien creature, all I saw was the fallacy of death and what everything looks like with no eyes, that’s about all I can say about DMT…
Any who, I really enjoy your videos, stretching the mind is second only to playing in the garden…