Download Bank Template - drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1a74K1Bl10ANIPpMmZ7NlMJl3PlaMTEih Toggle Reset Groups - ua-cam.com/video/j4OFo8wISoM/v-deo.htmlsi=H6WfLcWUQiZVlH60 PC Number Scroll - ua-cam.com/video/p2vQuG3fLYs/v-deo.htmlsi=3BKyowOMh17bpKS7 Preset Message Scroll - ua-cam.com/video/VtSx68vfjS8/v-deo.htmlsi=eG16Hv4mjnXVfZwd
I have a MC6Pro with my Nano Cortex and a H90 wired pre-post. The MC6 makes it all work, including momentary unlatched preset changes. It's a great little rig
I use a Rocktron All Access midi controller with my Nano and it works great. I have 15 presets per bank at my feet. Saves wear on the rotary switches on my Nano as well.
Great! So the solution for this pedalboard friendly unit is to buy another unit that is as big to control it, silly me... why didnt I think of that.....
@@MorningstarEngineering I'm sorry, but even if the MC6 Pro is a great piece of gear.. I think that particular contraption is not ideal by a good long shot... It raises the price to double and also the real estate needed, introduces cables and points of possible failure with that. At that point I consider myself better off with a helix LT or anything other than that nano cortex. But if other people love it that's great.
@@musicsurfandrats This is why I use all in one units. But for those who want to use individual pedals and don't want to tap dance then some sort of switcher is needed. Every setup has its pros and cons.
Great unit.. but adding this to a Nano Cortex brings the price closer to a Quad Cortex.. but since I own lots of Neural DSP Plug-ins I might give it a try...
@@MorningstarEngineeringim just saying that you can do all of that with a qc all in one for about the same price. I still think the nano is a great option if you want a simple quality rig or if you already have all the extras but I wouldn’t go out of my way to make it do what a qc already does
@@MorningstarEngineering OK, fair enough. Perhaps I came in with miscalibrated expectations - the way this was presented seemed to exaggerate the inconvenience/disfunction of the Nano Cortex - especially in regard to its lack of screen and its reliance on an app. To me, the deliberate choice to use an app instead of an onboard screen is actually far superior in terms of usability and efficiency of operation as compared with other many other similar devices with onboard screens. To overemphasize that as a flaw and to then represent your device as the solution seemed to me to be a bit disingenuous - that's all. No doubt yours is an excellent product with highly beneficial applications (and I'm certainly interested in learning more). Thanks for taking the time to respond and for giving me the opportunity to explain my initial comment. I do apologize if I came across too harshly
Download Bank Template - drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1a74K1Bl10ANIPpMmZ7NlMJl3PlaMTEih
Toggle Reset Groups - ua-cam.com/video/j4OFo8wISoM/v-deo.htmlsi=H6WfLcWUQiZVlH60
PC Number Scroll - ua-cam.com/video/p2vQuG3fLYs/v-deo.htmlsi=3BKyowOMh17bpKS7
Preset Message Scroll - ua-cam.com/video/VtSx68vfjS8/v-deo.htmlsi=eG16Hv4mjnXVfZwd
Where’s the video on how to set up displaying preset names using the preset rename function?
Give this man a raise. He explains things so well
I have a MC6Pro with my Nano Cortex and a H90 wired pre-post. The MC6 makes it all work, including momentary unlatched preset changes. It's a great little rig
With this you have access to 8 presets right? The 6 on the midi and the two on the nano also correct...
once again, you guys show how powerful your devices are and every musician should have one.
I use a Rocktron All Access midi controller with my Nano and it works great. I have 15 presets per bank at my feet. Saves wear on the rotary switches on my Nano as well.
This seems like the perfect add on for a new Fractal product coming out…
thinking of getting one of these for the kemper player with all the new levels unlocked, will you do something like this for the KPP?
Can you do a video using MC6 pro with fractal VP4?
Hi!! does the mc6 pro maintain the spillover through changes of presets?
Preset spillover is the default for the nano cortex so adding the MC6 Pro shouldn't change that behavior.
@@DoctorMcFarlandStudios oh ok, thanos a lot for the clarify! 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼
But how much is the midi controller….. I’m guessing it’s like 20$ in savings over the quad cortex?
👏great work, as usual!
Great! So the solution for this pedalboard friendly unit is to buy another unit that is as big to control it, silly me... why didnt I think of that.....
That’s right! You’ll be using the MIDI controller to switch/control your other pedals on the pedalboard too!
@@MorningstarEngineering I'm sorry, but even if the MC6 Pro is a great piece of gear.. I think that particular contraption is not ideal by a good long shot... It raises the price to double and also the real estate needed, introduces cables and points of possible failure with that. At that point I consider myself better off with a helix LT or anything other than that nano cortex. But if other people love it that's great.
@@musicsurfandrats This is why I use all in one units. But for those who want to use individual pedals and don't want to tap dance then some sort of switcher is needed. Every setup has its pros and cons.
Is the preset change through MIDI gapless on the nanocortex ?
Yes it is!
Pretty slick!
Great unit.. but adding this to a Nano Cortex brings the price closer to a Quad Cortex.. but since I own lots of Neural DSP Plug-ins I might give it a try...
This is for user who are using the Nano Cortex with other pedals. The MIDI controller will be used to control multiple devices.
what kind of Trs cable is that ?? And where i can get one ? Thanks
That’s our own TRS cable design that we offer on our website but any TRS cable will work
quick question, so since my main 4 presets will be IA IB IIA IIB, would i be able to use this additional footswitch to access them better?
Yes, you can access those 4 presets with a Morningstar controller, but also you can access any of the 64 presets on the Nano Cortex instantly.
@MorningstarEngineering tbh I'd only use the 4, thanks for the reply
Then what you want to achieve buddy ?
Did you have to name those presets on the MC6?, or do they just show up from the Cortex?
You have to name them on the controller
Make a video for the kemper player please
UAFX, are you watching this god dammit?!?
yeah but with the price of the MC6.....well change the whole game...maybe you can look at other solutions or save for thr Quad Cortex
You’ll be controlling other devices on your pedalboard with the MIDI controller too! Not just the Nano Cortex
The point of a qc is to not need other devices
@@erichatzis5986 Sure, but our reply was about the NC.
@@MorningstarEngineeringim just saying that you can do all of that with a qc all in one for about the same price. I still think the nano is a great option if you want a simple quality rig or if you already have all the extras but I wouldn’t go out of my way to make it do what a qc already does
Is not that this is unusual. This is unusual at this price point.
MC6 pro + Nano cortex + Pedaltrain nano = 1.89kg
Quad cortex = 1.95kg
Losing a tonne of functionality, for a saving of 60g?
A MIDI controller is used to control other pedals on a pedalboard too. Not just the Nano Cortex!
I jst bught quod cortex..too much to think about.
The nano cortex is an overpriced flop.
You just don’t understand it’s place in the market
This is just an advertisement for your product in the guise of something else. That's a bit disappointing
Hi. The title says MC6 PRO. No guises there. What information were you hoping to find? Let us know and we will do our best to assist you!
@@MorningstarEngineering OK, fair enough. Perhaps I came in with miscalibrated expectations - the way this was presented seemed to exaggerate the inconvenience/disfunction of the Nano Cortex - especially in regard to its lack of screen and its reliance on an app. To me, the deliberate choice to use an app instead of an onboard screen is actually far superior in terms of usability and efficiency of operation as compared with other many other similar devices with onboard screens. To overemphasize that as a flaw and to then represent your device as the solution seemed to me to be a bit disingenuous - that's all. No doubt yours is an excellent product with highly beneficial applications (and I'm certainly interested in learning more). Thanks for taking the time to respond and for giving me the opportunity to explain my initial comment. I do apologize if I came across too harshly