Battle of the Titans: iPhone 16 Pro Max vs iPhone 16 Pro vs iPhone 16 Plus vs iPhone 16

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 вер 2024
  • Battle of the Titans: iPhone 16 Pro Max vs iPhone 16 Pro vs iPhone 16 Plus vs iPhone 16
    In this detailed comparison, we dive into the key differences and standout features of Apple's latest lineup: the iPhone 16 Pro Max, iPhone 16 Pro, iPhone 16 Plus, and iPhone 16. From display sizes and camera capabilities to performance benchmarks and battery life, we explore how each model caters to different user needs. Whether you're looking for the ultimate in power and features with the Pro Max or a more budget-friendly option with the standard iPhone 16, this review will help you decide which model suits you best.
    Phone 16 Pro Max, iPhone 16 Pro, iPhone 16 Plus, iPhone 16, Apple comparison, smartphone review, mobile technology, iPhone features, camera performance, battery life, display quality, user experience, tech specs, iOS updates, phone design, performance review, mobile innovation, flagship comparison, high-end smartphones, device specs, Apple devices, iPhone lineup, mobile trends, latest iPhones, device durability, iPhone photography, smartphone market, tech enthusiasts, mobile devices, premium smartphones, best smartphones
    Disclaimer. We can not guarantee that the information on this page is 100% correct. If a particular specification is vital to you, we always recommend checking with the phone seller and the best way to start is by visiting their website directly.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 13

  • @MrJengy84
    @MrJengy84 2 місяці тому +6

    60 hz 🤦🏻‍♂️

  • @saurabhgupta-rx9xo
    @saurabhgupta-rx9xo 2 місяці тому

    I think this time they will have 120Hz display all across

  • @marthavidal8759
    @marthavidal8759 Місяць тому +1

    I can’t wait to get my iPhone 16 pro max 😂😂

  • @vernearase3044
    @vernearase3044 2 місяці тому

    I doubt the 16 Plus and 16 will use A17 Pro - rather I think they'll use A18.
    A17 Pro is built on TSMC's N3B process node, a custom process node built for Apple when Apple was desperate for 3nm and N3E wasn't ready.
    N3B offers lower yields, higher manufacturing complexity, and higher cost. Apple is desperately trying to retire N3B which is why the iPad Pro got the M4 (the first device to get M4) instead of the M3 - M4 is built on N3E. Apple would've greatly preferred that the M4 be introduced in the MacBook Air and MacBook Pro, but Apple intends to retire M3 so they can get off the N3B process node.
    That throws off a _bunch_ of your stats as they're all based on the SoC which the lower cost phones will contain.

  • @user-qu3Ali2
    @user-qu3Ali2 2 місяці тому +2

    ❤❤

  • @qadir2
    @qadir2 2 місяці тому

    Yup 60 hz😂

  • @phuocnguyenhoang496
    @phuocnguyenhoang496 2 місяці тому +1

    Promax mãi đỉnh

  • @daoxuanthuytb
    @daoxuanthuytb 3 місяці тому +2

    Too boring 😢

  • @User52-y5s
    @User52-y5s 2 місяці тому +1

    Samsung S25 is Number 1