If this gentleman is Chancellor Merkel's military adviser, I will not find it difficult to understand why Germany always adopts a self-castration diplomatic strategy at critical moments. Last time,When their warship came to the South China Sea to declare freedom of navigation, I still felt incredible : more than 20 years ago, I was an employee of Siemens. German companies in China have always been the best foreign companies with the best reputation. They are generally respected in China. I have never heard that German merchant ships have been harassed by China in the South China Sea. What kind of stimulation made them come to the South China Sea to show their mucle to declare such an absurd claim? This German military strategist who is familiar with Machiavelli’s ”On War“ believes that this war is not decided by Europe , but by the United States and Russia. I can understand, but he actually thinks that Beijing may also be involved, It’s ridiculously incredible . Sure enough, Brussels is full of a group of war maniacs today. Doesn‘t he know that it is Beijing that most hopes that Europe can be stable and peaceful and pursuing its own interests? ! Merkel has been silent, Schulz is still sleepwalking, and Germany will never have politicians with vision like Schmidt and Kohl again. This is the sadness of Germany.
尽管从中国人的角度，瓦德博士的观点并不顺耳，但是这些观点对德国人和欧洲人来说关乎他们自己的利益。我认为理解德国人的角度对于任何智库学者和政府官员都很重要，因为他们需要知道对方的立场以便筹备谈判（平民则不需要考虑这些）。但是在选票会影响政治的国家中，平民无法理解这些观点就会造成影响。美国和欧洲很多国家的错误就在于，他们以为只需要考虑自己的立场和利益就够了，在面对中国或其它亚洲国家时，只需要强加自己的观点给对方，而不需要考虑对方的说法。
他们现在连自己的利益都不考虑了！就如冯德莱恩她在乎德国利益吗？不过是只听从于控制他们背后的势力吧！
@@amy7493 尽管大多数认为冯德莱恩不能代表，但是她仍然得到多数欧洲领导人的支持，不管是经过美国施压还是他们内部谈判，这就是中国面对的情况。而且欧洲大部分人相信视频中的观点。中国是应该说服大部分欧洲人改变看法，还是尽量处理这个现实呢？欧洲人跟美国人有历史联系，跟中国是历史性的敌对。德国直接把中国定义为政治上的敌人。
其实你们的逻辑就是有核武器就可以发动战争，有核武器就可以侵略，没有人阻止，只会让这个世界更可怕，接着，世界各地的小国家就会疯狂干一件事，发展核武器，后果更可怕，
分析非常清楚，謝謝你，👍👍👍🎉🎉🎉
只是听他描述美俄中的关系因缘 就可看出他Vad 方不下自己的偏见 又怎么能解决问题呢
乌克兰人不回去乌克兰 是因为这些乌克兰人了解 这是美国的战争 不是乌克兰的
感谢分享俄乌之外第三国的声音
那个战前说了一句“普京应该被尊重”，然后被迫辞职的人呢？😅
棋子的无奈，德国和日本一样
If this gentleman is Chancellor Merkel's military adviser, I will not find it difficult to understand why Germany always adopts a self-castration diplomatic strategy at critical moments. Last time,When their warship came to the South China Sea to declare freedom of navigation, I still felt incredible : more than 20 years ago, I was an employee of Siemens. German companies in China have always been the best foreign companies with the best reputation. They are generally respected in China. I have never heard that German merchant ships have been harassed by China in the South China Sea. What kind of stimulation made them come to the South China Sea to show their mucle to declare such an absurd claim? This German military strategist who is familiar with Machiavelli’s ”On War“ believes that this war is not decided by Europe , but by the United States and Russia. I can understand, but he actually thinks that Beijing may also be involved, It’s ridiculously incredible . Sure enough, Brussels is full of a group of war maniacs today. Doesn‘t he know that it is Beijing that most hopes that Europe can be stable and peaceful and pursuing its own interests? ! Merkel has been silent, Schulz is still sleepwalking, and Germany will never have politicians with vision like Schmidt and Kohl again. This is the sadness of Germany.
👏👍💪💐❤️💋
🎉😂❤😂🎉🎉
瓦特博士是現实主義的中間派，在歐洲應該是最理性的。但是對中俄的定位是非常有偏見和雙標的，中俄有正常的經貿是事實，就像印度和土耳其一樣。他們和俄羅斯還有武器交易，但並沒有受到西方遣責。因为他們是美國的盟友。中國奉行不結盟政策，不參與戰爭不鼓勵戰爭，提出用和平方案解決爭端，但是受到西方的譴責，要求中國站隊西方。中國的和平行動也是歐洲想做的。只是歐洲政客放棄了歐洲的利益，沒人去做對歐洲有利的事情，歐洲的政策是圍繞美國的利益制定的。從現實主義來說，作為一個核大國的俄羅斯怎麼會做別人的小弟，作為世界貿易大國的中國也不會輕易放棄自己的利益和立場，五常中的國家只有中國沒有完成自己的國土 統一。為什麼台灣問題被歐美人认为是引爆第三次世界大戰，中國不發展軍事力量是無法完成國土統一的。更無法保證世界第一經貿大國的地位。如果北約要擴張到亞洲，歐盟會解體北約也不復存在。歐盟每個成員和北約的每個成員的利益都是不同的。就如瓦特博士所說的，第三次大戰是在有核武器的情況下发生是不可思議的。到關鍵時刻核大國会妥協。其他国家要么被犧牲要麼被放棄。歐洲处在生死的十字路口。如果祝中國為敵人歐盟就會分裂，如果視中國為和平勢力，歐洲就會成為世界另一極。
誰會願意打一場注定不會贏的戰爭？？？
台🐸愿意
俄烏是拜老頭的𠍇作