It makes that INTP is at True Neutral but personally I think I lean more to chaotic neutral as INTP or is it how I how to be? Edit: I took the test and I got chaotic neutral in the first test and did again it again and True Neutral. I Personally believe INTP basically can border between True Neutral and Chaotic Neutral but I will accept my fate as True Neutral.
as an INFP i agree completely!! i may not be “outwardly” chaotic but when it comes to any kind of standardised or organised belief or structure, I am extremely skeptical and feel a strong desire to challenge and break it. any kind of designated authority also easily triggers my anger
I don't, I question it but I don't feel need to break it, more scrutinize it and find out flaws in it. I don't have issue with authority as long authority doesn't abuse power, enforcer arbitrary standards, nonsensical or immoral standards (or it behaves in such manner).
I’m an INFP and I’ve been called a chaotic good, and can express the chaos outwardly by doing very spontaneous things 😂 All the INFP’s I’ve met also are total weirdos with great hearts
All XNTJS literally came here knowing that they are going to be placed in one of the evil ones. All XNFPs also probably came here knowing that they'll be in one of the good ones.
I absolutely agree, because that Fi can make us pretty detached from what's better for people as a whole, and if you get too caught up in it, you end up prioritising what you personally think is right over what would actually make people happy. And for infps who happen to have ideals of punishment and suffering for their own idea of evil, I'd say they end up almost ruthless in trying to manipulate people to their ideals
@@notjohn2672 As an INTJ I think INTJs all came here knowing we are Neutral and know people would try to put us in Evil. INTJ are very emotional, but can hold it and detach emotions to accomplish a goal. That is often misrepresented. Good and Evil. Right or Wrong. Meaningless. INTJ generally do what is Logical and Logic is Neutral.
@@notjohn2672 Well I speak only for myself here but I always been very adaptable depending on the situation, my mind is able to put aside every stereotype, prejudice, etc., And think only about the situation and the best way to solve the problem (if there's a problem), it can be the best for myself or, if needed, I can put my objectives aside and be the best for a love one. It can be as simple as deciding where to eat, or repairing furniture, or as complicated as changing the power dynamic in the world. As @Marlock King said, we process facts and move logically, being good or evil are perceptions
In regards to whether Intjs are neutral due to the logic approach or adaptability, you would simply have to look at their tertiary Fi. Intjs having tertiary Fi means that they often at times repress there emotions unconsciously, appear more stoic in nature or unresponsive to emotional cues due to polar Fe. They often only lash out due to Se stress or if they are stuck within a Ni-Fi loop (when may cause the other). This does not mean however that the Intj's aspirations are purely logical as they still do have Tertiary Fi at the end of the day, which serves as their very flexible moral compass. Fi is normally the burning aspiration within the Intj that is often brought out by a Ni insight. Intj's often are normally in a reserved neutral position, until their setting threatens the stability of the intjs environment. This is often why some Intjs may appear as chaotic good or Evil neutral as they when pushed challenge authority or social norms because they sense incompetence or instability for them within the particular system or environment. Te serves as the logical manner for how Intjs achieve their goals and once they have achieved their goals they will often return back to a state of normalcy as they felt they have corrected or improved what needed to be solved. So in a sense you are correct that Intjs often are and in most cases will remain Neutral however, it's more due to their reserved nature and flexible Fi.
Lawful evil is wrong. We're any of the neutral categories. Personally I'm more of a chaotic neutral, which is sort of odd for INTJs, most of us are true neutral or lawful neutral.
INTP here- I've actually tried fitting myself in on where I'd be in D&D alignment before, and I've always felt split on true neutral and chaotic good. So I think your neutral/chaotic neutral split with neutral as the result is really actually spot on, considering that, at least from a personal lense, everything needs to be taken on a case by case basis for proper accuracy- not doing so denies important circumstantial factors. I can recognize selfishness within myself which is an evil trait, but in recognizing it push back with altruism. On an individual level, I've never wanted to bring suffering to anyone for its own sake. But I do think that there are ideas and concepts which need to be destroyed which supercede personal attatchments to them. When it all boils down, I simply absolutely agree true neutral is the proper call. It is, I think, a true neutral of baseline- that, perhaps, there is some time spent for a stint in any of the alignments for a time, but within the journey of mental reconstruction, it will shift in a way that trends toward neutral baseline. : )
I am also an INTP and got chaotic good. But I think the test I did was very inaccurate because the choices I would have made weren't their so I had to compromise.
I totally agree with this!! I've always been a person that analyzes things case by case and because of that, I've always noticed my thinking whether it be more critical, or more forgiving has always been different to other people. I never talked about what I think my morals are to other people because they come off more morally grey/shifting case by case. I never realized how much of a true neutral I am till now.
@@swordfish7165 intp is chaotic neutral for my understanding - they may make systems but would rather put themselves from it - like some creazy scientist excaping society, hiding on the edge of the village
INTJ is attached to everything and have an opinion on everything. The INTJ game: is convincing other people how little they care...but get to know them, you'd be surprised by all those beliefs and ideals.
@@character_049 Totally true I hate when people give strongly biased comments on a situation even if they don't know most of the circumstances. It likes whe don't know a lot so how can whe be in the true, just a little thing can change everything.
As an ISTP who has always been obsessed with cold/detached/emotionless characters and who plays as an assassin/rogue character in literally every rpg on the face of the earth, I was VERY pleased with the results of this tier list.
ENTJ: *gets video notification* ENTJ: _if I don't get some kind of evil I'm suing...or planning your demise..._ EDIT: Watched it. Got it. You're out of the woods and can relax now.
@@csengebabos3793 Naaah nothing cringy about that-bad is better and we _are_ the best, of course. Whoever doesn't see that is clearly blind. 😎 *fall out boy centuries starts playing*
As an INFJ, I agree with the neutral good placing. Even though I prefer true neutral, or even chaotic neutral, I realize what role I play in reality lol
Our high degree of individualism and detatched logic and kinesthetic ability is what allows us to be cold and ruthless killing machines. I love the concept but I'd rather not be in prison so back to engineering I go. 😭
As an INFJ, I think we tend to be more true neutral--we'd like to think we'd be on the "good guy's" side when the time comes to choose, but deep down we also know that no one is entirely good or bad and that to be loyal to a side is disloyal to what we know is correct. As you pointed out, we have a tendency to empathize with people who are quite scary which can lead to genuine warmth and affection for them and the urge to protect them from themselves and others. If it came down between siding with people who the majority think are right and letting this one probably evil friend get away with much of their schemes if it's not necessarily corrupt and won't hurt many if any people, then we might be just as likely (if not more so) to side with the evil-spectrumed friend and make it our responsibility to keep them out of trouble.
Hello, I'm an INFJ and I took the test and came up lawful good. I still think he put us in the right category of Neutral Good though because I think we are usually lawful good but we are far more lenient and will go against the rules if it serves a greater good. Also as natural advocates we would support changing laws to benefit oppresed people and even defend criminals if we think they should be let off the hook. However, we are not random or self serving in bending laws, but rather only bend them in instances that are benevolent or morally more righteous.
I think neutral would be taking it too far, I think we still err on the side of lawful or have lawful good as our default setting and only really deviate from that in specific exceptional situations. Such as, you were saying about being more likely to let your friend off the hook out of loyalty. See that is serving the greater moral good of being loyal, but if it wasn't your friend and you had no other reason not to turn them in, you would.
Haha! This comment is really insightful. Your wisdom to know that no one is entirely good or bad, to advocate for the best in others, and to seek justice despite social pressure I think all proves that you‘re one of the most GOOD kinds out there, friend. That, and your humility to assume you’re not.
I can say the same with INFP. We stick by our morals and ideals very closely, whenever right or wrong. I think perhaps an unhealthy INFP is a true neutral, as an unhealthy INFP myself.
As an INTP, I consider myself Chaotic Neutral. This comes down to me rarely accepting something as just being there without a valid reason. The biggest example of this is social expectations, where if I’m told to act a certain way in public, I immediately question it without taking “because it’s normal” as an answer, and if I think that a rule/expectation doesn’t have a valid reason behind it, I either ignore it if that’s an option or protest the fact that I don’t have the option to ignore it
INTP here. I feel deeply uncomfortable when something happens and I can't coherently explain why it happened. Like, when I read about historical / worldwide slavery, I don't find myself whining about how evil it is (and it is evil, obviously). Instead, I just want to know why it happened in basically every culture. People don't just do bad things for no reason, right? If it happened in every culture, then there must be a "reason" that every culture shares. Example: Nobody just wakes up and decides to murder a stranger and bury the corpse in an alley. Did they do it because they're mentally insane? Did they do it because they knew the person? I don't know. The reasons for something happening are more important to me than the event itself.
CN is a fun place for INTPs but I think that 99% of us tend to actually be very scared of true chaos when it comes down to it. It sounds more fun than law but also a little bit of law lays the baseline soil for literally everything to flourish. So many people don't understand that. And therefor, aren't neutral haha.
I've never met an INFP who is Chaotic good, all my INFPs friends r neutral good (actually, me too). Actually I think neutral good is more INFP than Chaotic good, bc INFPs hate conflict
INFJs meet people at their level...empathize even with people it's scary to empathize with...so true, at least in one case I know of! A rating somewhere between neutral and neutral good seems accurate to me.
@@JohnnyOttosson85 My ISTP sister would heartily agree with this comment. Meanwhile, I an INTP want to watch the whole video because it's interesting and I want to know the reasoning behind all the rest.
Every time I watch one of your videos, I feel so understood. We ISFJs usually get the "sweet baking mom" stereotype, but you see the complexity of our thought processes. I appreciate that so much. I'm a huge rule-follower and was anticipating a Lawful alignment, but your insight - that ultimately, we want good and aren't going to necessarily freak out over what everyone else does in regards to the rules - felt very on-point.
@@finnmonaghan4812 oh, is just that sometimes when I take the test I get one, and other times the other. Generally, when I’m feeling worse about myself, I’m more of a ENFP, surprisingly
@@elsalerno9318 huh, that’s strange. I mean wavering self confidence sounds pretty relatable, but then again I don’t know all that much about entps. Sorry I couldn’t be of more help!
Differences are in the reasons why ENFP do things vs ENTPs. ENFPs are using their heart first - head after, while ENTPs are using their head first - heart after.
INTJ after managing to land on the neutral spectrum instead of the evil spectrum: "The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist"
That would actually sound terrible. NE perhaps could on personal level do well in corporations but would be pretty bad for corporation due to prioritizing themselves and their benefits, they wouldn't think a second before committing a fraud if they thought they could get away with it. Lawful evil perhaps would be more welcome in a corporation.
I see a lot of other INFP's disagreeing with the selection here in the comments but I think it's spot on. Personally, I think we don't want to bring down structured systems if we think they are doing good for all involved, but we will always have an underlying distrust of those people in the positions of higher power. We may respect them by following their rules but will probably never trust that they truly have everyone's bests interests at heart. Personally, I'm not thinking all the time about tearing down a system even if I find it a bit limiting because I know the system is there for a reason and without it there would be utter chaos. We INFP's almost need that system to define the fact that we are limited by it in some way. We aren't really conventional law breakers but more like breakers of social norms and thought. If we sense that people in positions of power are just trying to get more power and more control without caring about those who have less power in the system that's when our chaotic side comes out. I think younger INFP's (myself included) could possibly fall into the Lawful/ Neutral Good categories until they really get a taste of life and realize that not everyone is looking out for your best interests and many people will try to take advantage of you. INFP's seem to be constant targets of people who want to take advantage of them in some way because I think we come off as innocent, pure, and conflict adverse. Once we've been tested enough this way I think the Chaotic Good side comes out, however the change is internal and I don't think even our closest friends will pick up on it. We're the the quieter and softer spoken revolutionaries in times when it's called for. We're still good, we're for good no matter the cost.
As an INTJ very happy to see us in True Neutral. Good/Evil, Right/Wrong, or light/dark mere concepts that change on a dine. INTJ have control of their emotions and goals to accomplish. You can help or be dropped liked a hot potato. INTJ don't even mean to drop people, but goals need be reached and you are no longer part of the design. Do you see? No, caring about good/evil in the decision process, but it looks sooooo bad that people want to throw us to dark side. We are more complicated then that! lol. ENTJ, however. Pure Evil. Been saying that for years.
I’m an ENTJ. My alignment is chaotic good, however most people probably see me as neutral because my primary behaviors may not express good, but I go in with good intentions
I mean as an INTJ I took this test and my alignment was chaotic neutral. So it was somewhat accurate as I best attempt to view specific situations very objectively when need be. The chaotic part though? I think that's just me being me in the sense that I like to have my fun and make decisions in a not so practical, but fair way that can come off as chaotic
As a long-time writer and a recent Game Master, I've always liked taking this as a challenge to create characters with counter-intuitive combinations :D like Lawful Evil ESFP Chaotic Evil ESFJ Lawful Neutral INFP Chaotic Good ENTJ Chaotic Evil ENFJ Chaotic Evil ISTJ Lawful Evil INTP
I as an intj came here thinking I would be placed in true neutral. I wouldn't say I can detach completely but I can force myself to achieve the highest level of objectivity. Well made tier lists in all your vids. Keep up the good work.
As INFJs myself. I take test in D&D Alignment and I fell around Chaotic neutral and Chaotic evil.... edit : I do believed that before I got 'damaged' from society, I'm either neutral good or chaotic good. but after being corrupted and betrayed. I turned chaotic
SPOT ON! I’m an INTP and I decided to take the test before watching your video. I got both chaotic neutral and true neutral as my highest results (chaotic neutral was higher by 3 points only)
I’m an INTP who always tests as chaotic neutral, but I behave like both chaotic and true neutrals. I think it’s because I am, ultimately, a good-leaning or “chill” chaotic neutral. There are subcategories to the alignments and they help sort out certain discrepancies in the pure descriptions.
I'm an istp, I've never played or even new the alignment chart came from this game. I got down to 3 possible types, chaotic good, true neutral, and chaotic neutral. And I can't tell which one fits me more.
That's also a very decent reminder that the Good/Evil-allignment might not be as black and white as it suggests (though plenty of old D&D-campaigns just go with that for simplicity); but it's moreso a sort of representation of what your inner values are and also if you, on a more philosophical level, believe in such terms as good/evil to begin with. People in the Good-category still have plenty of opportunity to do wrong, as they ascribe high value to justice and their own morality, which might not fit the justice nor wellbeing of everyone, even if they don't realise that! While people in the Evil-category, with a more cynical and calculating outlook, are still able to manifest those logistical abilities into doing good. Idk, it's a bit hard to explain, but I just feel that there's definite room for expanding the otherwise a bit contrived definitions.
I took the test too, and as an INFJ myself, I got lawful good. But after reading what it was all about for lawful good, I find myself leaning towards neutral good. I like doing the right thing, but if it's for the greater good, than I will bend a rule or two.
As soon as you described Neutral Good in the beginning, I knew INFJ should sit there. Good job! (Although True Neutral is a possibility as well, the altruistic vision part probably keeps us in the Neutral Good - depends on the day maybe). - INFJ
ENTJ, I am chaotic neutral with some lawful evil traits (not impulsive, will follow the letter if not necessarily the spirit of contracts/agreements made).
Gen Z really loves self labelling themselves in strict but totally unscientific systems, then self-proclaime as the most open-minded and inclusive P.S. the dnd alignment chart is not to be intended as a personality but as way to approach ethic, which can be correlated to your personality but ultimately there are multiple ways of beign chaotic-good or neutral-evil and so on.
Ah yes, nothing says 'open-minded' like fitting ourselves into neatly labeled boxes. It's like wearing a 'Chaotic Neutral' badge while ignoring the irony of being chaotic and needing a label. Guess we all have to rebel in a perfectly structured way, right?
INTP here. I kinda feel like I could be anything from Lawful Good to Chaotic Evil, each category would fit in a way. Soooo yeah, True Neutral kinda sums it up pretty well 🤣
INTP here. I've taken the alignment test before a couple of times and consistently gotten true neutral. I think it has a lot to do with being able to hold multiple perspectives simultaneously and being able to see the harm/good and value/worthlessness of any of those perspectives. Fun video.
Great analysis. I did the alignment test some time ago and got a true neutral. I was watching the video, thinking: if my type gets 'true neutral' - there is no need for a 'how INTJs defy their stereotype' video. Sounds like a meaningful closure of so called 2020.
True neutral, seems about right. I tend to leave people to their own devices & do my own thing. If someone seeks my help, I can lean towards good. If they seek to get on my bad side, then my bad side they shall receive.
I'm an ISTP and got True Neutral. I think this is fitting. ISTPs could be the rebellious hero (think Wolverine), or they could be the "it's not personal" Contract killer. Or they could simply not give an f, as long as you don't get in their way.
As soon as I saw the Darth Vader image & quote my ENTJ'ness started chanting Vader, Vader! LOL! Nathan this is the best MBTI channel on youtube. Thank you for the insight and laughs.
Dude I'm an INFP that got true neutral 😂😂 what happened?? I did the test twice before watching the Video. I thought I was a moral compass, a paragon of virtue and goodness, a...never mind I'm happy with being neutral, because I don't like judging or fighting others🤷♀️
as an ISTP i feel myself pretty neutral and sometimes evil so this was pretty accurate.. and my sister is INFJ and she is pretty neutral too but good ..
As an INFJ, watching you do these videos is so intellectually satisfying; I always find myself coming to the same conclusions as you & using roughly the same reasoning to get there. It's so interesting how similarly different types think despite the stark differences in our functional stacks :)
I'm an INFP that has loved D&D since my teenage years and always play Chaotic Good. Well done Nathan! ps good to see you put my ENTJ mother in lawful Evil, I can't wait to tell her
I'm INTP & I think that we are definitely in the "neutral good" category as long as we're able to fully embrace our INTPness, and chaotic good if we are pressured to conform to a mode of action that is fundamentally illogical...
As an INTJ type person, I can understand being considered a True Neutral aligned character in an RPG. I do find myself very often unconcerned with other people's opinions of whether what I am doing or talking about is 'good' or 'evil', I'm just focused on achieving my goal. When I am a Dungeon Master for an RPG campaign, I find myself equally at home with getting into character role playing a good aligned or an evil aligned NPC. Also, when it comes to lawful and chaotic, I'm totally situational about that. I'll side with whichever helps me achieve my goal. I value law and order, but certain laws or orders that conflict with what I'm trying to achieve really annoy me and I wish I could dispense with them while I'm after that goal. On the other hand, I find being surrounded by total chaos to be very draining and annoying, but every now and then, I have an impulse to do something spontaneous, or somewhat out of character for me that is like embracing chaos for a bit.
Maybe it's just me, but as an infp, I have always leaned very much into the true neutral. Do to my hate of conflict, and my own cynicism (which isn't really a concrete infp trait, just something I have developed) I have learned to just stay out of everyone's business. If someone needs help, or needs me, I way the pro's and con's of the situation in order to see the possible outcomes. In other words I look at the big picture and make a decision. It usually comes down to the fact of "will this benefit me and the other person at the same time, or will one of us get hurt?" I care deeply about the people I love and am very proud of my emotions and values, but everyone around me always wants me to choose a side, which I hate and refuse to do since everyone has a right to believe what they want and express it as long it doesn't hurt anyone else. In other words, as long as people respect one another, people can get along relatively fine. This doesn't mean they have to like each other, but they do need to respect the other person's opinion and acknowledge it. Keep an open mind if you will. But that philosophy seems illogical to most of my family and friends, especially my dad who is an estj, who I always tend to argue with. Do to this, I don't want anything to do with people anymore unless it benefits me as well in some way since no one can get along. I agree with treebeard. "Side? I'm on nobody's side, because no one is on my side."
INFP here I took a personality test for alignments once and i got put in Chaotic neutral, which makes a lot of sense, the need to pursue one's goals trough their own rules can be egoistical, yet flexible when growing oneself Often when one thinks they are being chaotic good they are actually dipping into the not so good direction since it's a pretty slippery slope, it's really a matter of for what you do the things you do. Because it's right, or because you want it to be right? This also then spills into the whole "what counts? what they do or what they think they do?" Where a character (like Thanos, for example) really thinks that what they are doing is the best thing to do, but fail to realize how many evil deeds they do in their wake
Yeah,like The results of the chaos are far important than the chaos itself I mean,chaos is great and all but we still have a little of empathy about the negative social impacts but... Meh,It is a cicle.
@@itsspoodini the issue is we are the opposite of chaotic. We plan EVERYTHING. Although I do suspect we thrive in chaos due to our rational, yet ordered nature allowing for easy navigation.🤔
@@harrycrosswell2844 we do plan everything and when things are going bad, that's not our happiest place. That's why I had the thought of chaos. I don't know about you, but I can get lost in my head
im chaotic neutral infj because fuck rules and fuck boundaries ima do whatever I want, the government has more often than not horrible leaders and because I would easily betray someone who is not from my really small family and friend circle nothin gonna stop me boiiiiiiiii
If I had to ask myself which 3 I tend to shift from depending on circumstance: 1. Neutral Good when times are easy, I just want to be helpful to others. 2. Chaotic Neutral when I am observing something that I find amusing and not all too invested in. 3. Lawful Evil when times seem hard and things don't go my way, I want the established order so I can feel secure.
Thanks for the effort you put into the videos. I think the INTP is true, yes, they can be neutral, especially if you look at the conversations we have with ourselves, presenting both povs at the same time, being neutral can be really possible. Sometimes as u said can be more leaning into one side but overall neutral and objective. (Nice idea for the video) .Also, what is your type (im kinda confused)? And random question, do you think a feely type and thinking type can get along well? [working on figuring out which type Nathan is]
Great vid! IMO: Lawful Good: ENFJ, ESFJ Neutral Good: INFJ, ISFJ Chaotic Good: ISFP, ENFP, INFP Lawful Neutral: ISTJ True Neutral: INTP, ISTP, INTJ Chaotic Neutral: ENTP, ESFP Lawful Evil: ENTJ Neutral Evil: ESTJ Chaotic Evil: ESTP I think ISTP has the potential to go either way depending what will serve their purpose!
I was once told that "lawful" isn't necessarily about legislation but one's moral code (for example, w this in mind I'd consider Robin Hood a lawful good not because he follows the law but because he strictly follows his moral code- steal from the rich to give to the poor)
Get to know the real you with mindmymind - dub.sh/lovewho
INTP is definitely true neutral because while ENTP couldn't care less, *we can*
Yes!
As am ENTP, I feel a bit insulted.
Nah, I'm joking.
@@aquisuii ye, the more interinsting one is the "side" i would join
I feel more like a lawful neutral because I’m to scared to show my chaotic neutral self
I’m an intp but I relate more to chaotic neutral rather than true neutral
As an INTP, I literally took the alignment test yesterday and got true neutral. You really are pretty good a this.
Lol same
It makes that INTP is at True Neutral but personally I think I lean more to chaotic neutral as INTP or is it how I how to be?
Edit: I took the test and I got chaotic neutral in the first test and did again it again and True Neutral. I Personally believe INTP basically can border between True Neutral and Chaotic Neutral but I will accept my fate as True Neutral.
Where you took the test?
I'm also an INTP and got true neutral
@@venetiancopper6032 I got neutral good
Time Stamps:
ISTJ - 4:42
ENFJ - 5:30
ISFJ - 5:50
ENFP - 6:14
ISFP - 6:45
ENTP - 7:14
ESFJ - 7:43
ENTJ - 8:21
INFJ - 8:50
INTP - 9:20
ESFP - 9:56
INFP - 10:29
ESTJ - 10:55
INTJ - 11:23
ESTP - 11:58
ISTP - 12:25
you're my hero
Thank you !
@Daniel the Maniel you are correct my good sir
Edit: actually nvm lol I'm a lawful neutral i looked at my results again lol
Thank you for this kind gesture!
Thanks!
as an INFP i agree completely!! i may not be “outwardly” chaotic but when it comes to any kind of standardised or organised belief or structure, I am extremely skeptical and feel a strong desire to challenge and break it. any kind of designated authority also easily triggers my anger
I agree. As an INFP, I feel very similarly
I don't, I question it but I don't feel need to break it, more scrutinize it and find out flaws in it. I don't have issue with authority as long authority doesn't abuse power, enforcer arbitrary standards, nonsensical or immoral standards (or it behaves in such manner).
I’m an INFP and I’ve been called a chaotic good, and can express the chaos outwardly by doing very spontaneous things 😂 All the INFP’s I’ve met also are total weirdos with great hearts
I love us.
high Fi users always intrigue me 👍. seems you guys have an internalised "emotional palates". in a sense you see world through a systematic way
All XNTJS literally came here knowing that they are going to be placed in one of the evil ones. All XNFPs also probably came here knowing that they'll be in one of the good ones.
Actually I came here because I love Nathan's Videos. But you got me there (I'm an INFP) xD
@@la-esmeralda I said 'came here knowing' not 'came here because' , Nice Se PoLR you got there xD.
@@thepanthar My bad🙈
What do the letters mean though? I'm pretty new to Mbti.
@@la-esmeralda if you are talking about PoLR then thats another word for your 7th function which is supposed to be your weakest.
@@Mia_2512 facts.
I feel like infp can turn from chaotic good to chaotic evil depending on their character development. Look at gypsy crusader for example
True
just like spinel from steven universe movie
@@maiquemello219 i think Spinel is a misunderstood ENFP. She's open with her feelings and focuses on sending her message in a more assertive way
I absolutely agree, because that Fi can make us pretty detached from what's better for people as a whole, and if you get too caught up in it, you end up prioritising what you personally think is right over what would actually make people happy. And for infps who happen to have ideals of punishment and suffering for their own idea of evil, I'd say they end up almost ruthless in trying to manipulate people to their ideals
It's not evil, to destroy evil...
As an INTJ and a true neutral, I totally agree with all of this (even though I know a lot of people would've put us in lawful evil)
i might have put you in neutral evil or even chaotic good
I don't think you fit in neutral
@@notjohn2672 As an INTJ I think INTJs all came here knowing we are Neutral and know people would try to put us in Evil. INTJ are very emotional, but can hold it and detach emotions to accomplish a goal. That is often misrepresented. Good and Evil. Right or Wrong. Meaningless. INTJ generally do what is Logical and Logic is Neutral.
@@notjohn2672 Well I speak only for myself here but I always been very adaptable depending on the situation, my mind is able to put aside every stereotype, prejudice, etc., And think only about the situation and the best way to solve the problem (if there's a problem), it can be the best for myself or, if needed, I can put my objectives aside and be the best for a love one.
It can be as simple as deciding where to eat, or repairing furniture, or as complicated as changing the power dynamic in the world.
As @Marlock King said, we process facts and move logically, being good or evil are perceptions
In regards to whether Intjs are neutral due to the logic approach or adaptability, you would simply have to look at their tertiary Fi.
Intjs having tertiary Fi means that they often at times repress there emotions unconsciously, appear more stoic in nature or unresponsive to emotional cues due to polar Fe. They often only lash out due to Se stress or if they are stuck within a Ni-Fi loop (when may cause the other).
This does not mean however that the Intj's aspirations are purely logical as they still do have Tertiary Fi at the end of the day, which serves as their very flexible moral compass.
Fi is normally the burning aspiration within the Intj that is often brought out by a Ni insight.
Intj's often are normally in a reserved neutral position, until their setting threatens the stability of the intjs environment. This is often why some Intjs may appear as chaotic good or Evil neutral as they when pushed challenge authority or social norms because they sense incompetence or instability for them within the particular system or environment. Te serves as the logical manner for how Intjs achieve their goals and once they have achieved their goals they will often return back to a state of normalcy as they felt they have corrected or improved what needed to be solved.
So in a sense you are correct that Intjs often are and in most cases will remain Neutral however, it's more due to their reserved nature and flexible Fi.
Lawful evil is wrong. We're any of the neutral categories. Personally I'm more of a chaotic neutral, which is sort of odd for INTJs, most of us are true neutral or lawful neutral.
“Ma’am you are a lawful neutral kind of person” - me to my Mom
My boss in our household is the lawful good. An ENFJ lady.
INTP here- I've actually tried fitting myself in on where I'd be in D&D alignment before, and I've always felt split on true neutral and chaotic good. So I think your neutral/chaotic neutral split with neutral as the result is really actually spot on, considering that, at least from a personal lense, everything needs to be taken on a case by case basis for proper accuracy- not doing so denies important circumstantial factors. I can recognize selfishness within myself which is an evil trait, but in recognizing it push back with altruism. On an individual level, I've never wanted to bring suffering to anyone for its own sake. But I do think that there are ideas and concepts which need to be destroyed which supercede personal attatchments to them. When it all boils down, I simply absolutely agree true neutral is the proper call. It is, I think, a true neutral of baseline- that, perhaps, there is some time spent for a stint in any of the alignments for a time, but within the journey of mental reconstruction, it will shift in a way that trends toward neutral baseline. : )
Exactly. Sometimes true neutral, sometimes chaotic good. Chaotic neutral would be me actually. (INTP - mostly)
I have definitely related to both of you.
I'd say I'm chaotic neutral, either way it doesn't matter to me how I'm referred
I am also an INTP and got chaotic good. But I think the test I did was very inaccurate because the choices I would have made weren't their so I had to compromise.
I totally agree with this!! I've always been a person that analyzes things case by case and because of that, I've always noticed my thinking whether it be more critical, or more forgiving has always been different to other people. I never talked about what I think my morals are to other people because they come off more morally grey/shifting case by case. I never realized how much of a true neutral I am till now.
Nathan: *explains what is chaotic good category"
Me, ENFP: YEP. That's me. Just wait for the revolution, my friends~
Seeing as there is an E in the beginning, what you are talking about could only be counter-revolution...
Agreeee
Love lots of things , hate rules. ENFP agrees on CG. Rules are for people that lack a moral compass of their own.
Just yesterday, I was ranting to my coworkers about how legal paperwork is stupid and complicated.
I felt the same the moment he explained chaotic neutral
- ENTP
"INTJ's are detached from.. Well everything." As an INTJ I found that quite relatable and funny
Mixed messages as to whether I'm INTJ or INTP ... but either way I now know I'm a True Neutral ... & proud of it.
@@swordfish7165 intp is chaotic neutral for my understanding - they may make systems but would rather put themselves from it - like some creazy scientist excaping society, hiding on the edge of the village
Very true fellow INTJ
INTJ is attached to everything and have an opinion on everything. The INTJ game: is convincing other people how little they care...but get to know them, you'd be surprised by all those beliefs and ideals.
So did I- INTJ
ENTP: This is contradictory-
Me: Yeah that sums it up
Same lol
*o x y m o r o n s i n t e n s i f i e s*
We are walking paradoxical oxymorons 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Chaotic Neutral is exactly where we belong as well lol
I like that spiral more than anything I've seen in some time, and that's what really matters. Guess my type./j
If entps are not one of the chaotic I'm done lmao
I'am ENTP and true neutral 😅
Me too (ENTP true neutral), cause for me it depends on the circumstances
@@character_049 Totally true I hate when people give strongly biased comments on a situation even if they don't know most of the circumstances. It likes whe don't know a lot so how can whe be in the true, just a little thing can change everything.
Yeah :)
@@Prinaananas123 it was a joke... The 'lmao' should give it away to any decent human lol...
As an ISTP who has always been obsessed with cold/detached/emotionless characters and who plays as an assassin/rogue character in literally every rpg on the face of the earth, I was VERY pleased with the results of this tier list.
Same
Same but I'd say I lean more towards chaotic neutral
As an ISTP who alsways plays neutral GOOD characters, I do not agree so much.
Pretty much same here, but I'd put myself on Lawful Evil since it's easier to work under the rules. Although, only under the rules I agree with.
Me istp feels chaotic neutral
As an INFJ, I can say that neutral good fits me very well. I can easily move through chaotic situations, though I prefer order.
I just took an alignment test and ended up with Neutral Good as well and the description seemed to fit. -another INFJ (probably)
yeah i took the alignment test and i got neutral good too and im also an infj. it fits me well
I took the test and it gave me that I'm Neutral good or true neutral, so yeah, it fits (INFJ)
I’m INFJ lawful good with leanings towards neutral good
Yep I got neutral good too sigh
"Why are all the women in my live in the evil category?", said the INTP.
Is that his type? INTP? I've been wondering about that
Too true
@@andreareine8834 he said that he might be one in one of his older videos.
Isn’t it obvious? Because an INTP is the only one that can’t see their evil. Even the evils can see evil, often better so.
@@FermisAxiom INTP's evil doesn't go unnoticed by them, as they're self explorers and know quite a lot about themselves.
ENTJ: *gets video notification*
ENTJ: _if I don't get some kind of evil I'm suing...or planning your demise..._
EDIT: Watched it. Got it. You're out of the woods and can relax now.
same hahah I'm an ENTJ, - idk why - I always wanna be bad (and the best at everything ofc), It's just so cringy but idgaf
@@csengebabos3793 Naaah nothing cringy about that-bad is better and we _are_ the best, of course. Whoever doesn't see that is clearly blind. 😎 *fall out boy centuries starts playing*
I fucking love this comment section 😂😂
ejii
@@UrScum Please to please. *performs complicated dance moves ending with a dramatic bow*
As an INFJ, I agree with the neutral good placing. Even though I prefer true neutral, or even chaotic neutral, I realize what role I play in reality lol
xSTPs: 'Welcome to the dark side'
ISTP here
Yes.
So what?
Our high degree of individualism and detatched logic and kinesthetic ability is what allows us to be cold and ruthless killing machines. I love the concept but I'd rather not be in prison so back to engineering I go. 😭
I’m istp
First video I watch when we're not categorised as evil, phew 😂
Also, I absolutely agree that INTPs can be the true neutral!
-INTJ
well us INTJ keep getting accused of stuff ISTJ do. I'm pissed. ppl keep calling Tywin Lannister an INTJ for example. He's clearly an ISTJ.
Yep. You can count on INTPs to be objective in pursuit of the truth and INTJs to be objective in pursuit of their goals.
Because we are
I'm an INTJ and I keep getting true neutral in a test. One time, a classmate told me to decide for them because he knew I was a neutral person.
same.
“Unclouded by conscience, remorse, or delusions of morality... that would make such a good CV”
I’m dead 💀
INTP here, got true neutral on test, with leaning little more to the chaotic and evil sides.
Exactly same here lol
cringe
Chaotic neutral here as well!! Intp
Individual freedom first!!!!
same. i am an intp and i got true neutral as well
Im in between neutral good and and chaotic good
Tried this test as an INTP, got True Neutral. So you're pretty spot on in my case at least
Any relation to modest pelican?
Same, did the test before the vid began to see how he'd predict our type, I ended up with true neutral as well lol
From the beginning as an ENFP I knew I might either get placed in Neutral Good or Chaotic Good
As an INFJ, I think we tend to be more true neutral--we'd like to think we'd be on the "good guy's" side when the time comes to choose, but deep down we also know that no one is entirely good or bad and that to be loyal to a side is disloyal to what we know is correct. As you pointed out, we have a tendency to empathize with people who are quite scary which can lead to genuine warmth and affection for them and the urge to protect them from themselves and others. If it came down between siding with people who the majority think are right and letting this one probably evil friend get away with much of their schemes if it's not necessarily corrupt and won't hurt many if any people, then we might be just as likely (if not more so) to side with the evil-spectrumed friend and make it our responsibility to keep them out of trouble.
Hello, I'm an INFJ and I took the test and came up lawful good.
I still think he put us in the right category of Neutral Good though because I think we are usually lawful good but we are far more lenient and will go against the rules if it serves a greater good.
Also as natural advocates we would support changing laws to benefit oppresed people and even defend criminals if we think they should be let off the hook.
However, we are not random or self serving in bending laws, but rather only bend them in instances that are benevolent or morally more righteous.
I think neutral would be taking it too far, I think we still err on the side of lawful or have lawful good as our default setting and only really deviate from that in specific exceptional situations. Such as, you were saying about being more likely to let your friend off the hook out of loyalty.
See that is serving the greater moral good of being loyal, but if it wasn't your friend and you had no other reason not to turn them in, you would.
Haha! This comment is really insightful. Your wisdom to know that no one is entirely good or bad, to advocate for the best in others, and to seek justice despite social pressure I think all proves that you‘re one of the most GOOD kinds out there, friend. That, and your humility to assume you’re not.
I'm an INFJ. I took the test and came up lawful good too. 😊
I can say the same with INFP. We stick by our morals and ideals very closely, whenever right or wrong. I think perhaps an unhealthy INFP is a true neutral, as an unhealthy INFP myself.
What we learned from this video:
- xxFx = Good
- xxTx = Neutral / evil
- xSxx = Lawful
- xxFP = Chaotic Good
xxTJ = Neutral evil
ExTP = Chaotic evil
As an INTP, I consider myself Chaotic Neutral. This comes down to me rarely accepting something as just being there without a valid reason. The biggest example of this is social expectations, where if I’m told to act a certain way in public, I immediately question it without taking “because it’s normal” as an answer, and if I think that a rule/expectation doesn’t have a valid reason behind it, I either ignore it if that’s an option or protest the fact that I don’t have the option to ignore it
INTP here. I feel deeply uncomfortable when something happens and I can't coherently explain why it happened.
Like, when I read about historical / worldwide slavery, I don't find myself whining about how evil it is (and it is evil, obviously). Instead, I just want to know why it happened in basically every culture. People don't just do bad things for no reason, right? If it happened in every culture, then there must be a "reason" that every culture shares.
Example: Nobody just wakes up and decides to murder a stranger and bury the corpse in an alley. Did they do it because they're mentally insane? Did they do it because they knew the person?
I don't know. The reasons for something happening are more important to me than the event itself.
me an istp: ok lets go im chaotic neutral baby
him: neutral evil
me: *[surprise pikachu face]*
same
same
same
Hi, are you me?😳
Same
as an intp whenever i take the allignment test i always get true neutral or chaotic neutral so i'd say ur spot on lol
CN is a fun place for INTPs but I think that 99% of us tend to actually be very scared of true chaos when it comes down to it. It sounds more fun than law but also a little bit of law lays the baseline soil for literally everything to flourish.
So many people don't understand that. And therefor, aren't neutral haha.
I've never met an INFP who is Chaotic good, all my INFPs friends r neutral good (actually, me too). Actually I think neutral good is more INFP than Chaotic good, bc INFPs hate conflict
@riley jean that sounds like neutral good xd
@@npcimknot958 Yes of course, like everyone xd
But if something is against our values, we will be chaotic, untill we feel satisfied.
@@dorottyadesi208 I'm not saying we can't fight for our values...
I thought chaotic meant more doing things your way even if it's unconventionnal rather than straight up getting into conflicts ?
INFJs meet people at their level...empathize even with people it's scary to empathize with...so true, at least in one case I know of!
A rating somewhere between neutral and neutral good seems accurate to me.
Everybody should play dnd, it has something for everyone
Is Nathan like Sadistic? Cuz he's categorizing ISTP's last in these types of videos. LIKE GET ON WITH IT - ISTP
EXACTLY
I have noticed too. He knows we would stop watching as soon as we see ourselves.
@@JohnnyOttosson85 My ISTP sister would heartily agree with this comment. Meanwhile, I an INTP want to watch the whole video because it's interesting and I want to know the reasoning behind all the rest.
@@thecoleopterist Yep. I just gravitate towards ISTP classic line "Get to the point."
this is why timestamps in the comments are godsent
Okay, let's talk about ESTPs. *scrolls down to show "Chaotic Evil"*
I knew it when he scrolled down he gonna put me (an estp) in a chaotic evil lmao btw I’m a chaotic neutral.
I thought you'd be chaotic neutral tbh
Me, an ESTP: *surprised pikachu face*
How do you know you are an ESTP?
If you are asked what role you would want to play in a movie, you choose the crazy evil one.
@@MrLuigiFercotti what if...
I choose to be an extra
as INFP, I have gotten neutral good, true neutral, and lawful neutral results on alignment tests I've taken at different times of my life.
Same, I got true neutral the first time I took it, but before watching this I got neutral good :p
Really enjoying these (even if you might think it's "low effort content") :D
Do the dnd classes next!
Neutral Good has always been my favorite alignment.
Every time I watch one of your videos, I feel so understood. We ISFJs usually get the "sweet baking mom" stereotype, but you see the complexity of our thought processes. I appreciate that so much. I'm a huge rule-follower and was anticipating a Lawful alignment, but your insight - that ultimately, we want good and aren't going to necessarily freak out over what everyone else does in regards to the rules - felt very on-point.
My observation:
F- good
T- evil
J- lawful
P- chaotic
E/S- corners
I/N- centre
As a ENxP, I can say that this is very accurate. It’s rather scary, actually
Heyo! I’m an enfp. I’m curious as to what is confusing you about being an entp or am enfp, what’s up?
@@finnmonaghan4812 oh, is just that sometimes when I take the test I get one, and other times the other. Generally, when I’m feeling worse about myself, I’m more of a ENFP, surprisingly
@@elsalerno9318 huh, that’s strange. I mean wavering self confidence sounds pretty relatable, but then again I don’t know all that much about entps. Sorry I couldn’t be of more help!
Differences are in the reasons why ENFP do things vs ENTPs. ENFPs are using their heart first - head after, while ENTPs are using their head first - heart after.
@@finnmonaghan4812 You speak my language, Finn... Great name, too.
INTJ after managing to land on the neutral spectrum instead of the evil spectrum:
"The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist"
Lmao, "That would make such a good CV" about Neutral Evil.
Yep, sounds a lot like corporate to me.
That would actually sound terrible. NE perhaps could on personal level do well in corporations but would be pretty bad for corporation due to prioritizing themselves and their benefits, they wouldn't think a second before committing a fraud if they thought they could get away with it. Lawful evil perhaps would be more welcome in a corporation.
Nathan: **categorizes the types into D&D archetypes that they perceive as cool**
Every type: "This is so accurate!"
His mom: "What the..."
I see a lot of other INFP's disagreeing with the selection here in the comments but I think it's spot on. Personally, I think we don't want to bring down structured systems if we think they are doing good for all involved, but we will always have an underlying distrust of those people in the positions of higher power. We may respect them by following their rules but will probably never trust that they truly have everyone's bests interests at heart. Personally, I'm not thinking all the time about tearing down a system even if I find it a bit limiting because I know the system is there for a reason and without it there would be utter chaos. We INFP's almost need that system to define the fact that we are limited by it in some way. We aren't really conventional law breakers but more like breakers of social norms and thought. If we sense that people in positions of power are just trying to get more power and more control without caring about those who have less power in the system that's when our chaotic side comes out. I think younger INFP's (myself included) could possibly fall into the Lawful/ Neutral Good categories until they really get a taste of life and realize that not everyone is looking out for your best interests and many people will try to take advantage of you. INFP's seem to be constant targets of people who want to take advantage of them in some way because I think we come off as innocent, pure, and conflict adverse. Once we've been tested enough this way I think the Chaotic Good side comes out, however the change is internal and I don't think even our closest friends will pick up on it. We're the the quieter and softer spoken revolutionaries in times when it's called for. We're still good, we're for good no matter the cost.
Probably they different eannegram types. This ranking is mostly based on stereotypes
Props to Nathan for telling us how many notifications we can expect to receive per week. 👍
As an INTJ very happy to see us in True Neutral. Good/Evil, Right/Wrong, or light/dark mere concepts that change on a dine. INTJ have control of their emotions and goals to accomplish. You can help or be dropped liked a hot potato. INTJ don't even mean to drop people, but goals need be reached and you are no longer part of the design. Do you see? No, caring about good/evil in the decision process, but it looks sooooo bad that people want to throw us to dark side. We are more complicated then that! lol. ENTJ, however. Pure Evil. Been saying that for years.
As an intj, I disagree with you on entj as pure evil. Been meeting a number of them, i'd say they have more layers to them too.
I’m an ENTJ. My alignment is chaotic good, however most people probably see me as neutral because my primary behaviors may not express good, but I go in with good intentions
I mean as an INTJ I took this test and my alignment was chaotic neutral. So it was somewhat accurate as I best attempt to view specific situations very objectively when need be. The chaotic part though? I think that's just me being me in the sense that I like to have my fun and make decisions in a not so practical, but fair way that can come off as chaotic
@@Haz1Art same, I know a few, and they are strong-willed but not pure evil
As a long-time writer and a recent Game Master, I've always liked taking this as a challenge to create characters with counter-intuitive combinations :D like
Lawful Evil ESFP
Chaotic Evil ESFJ
Lawful Neutral INFP
Chaotic Good ENTJ
Chaotic Evil ENFJ
Chaotic Evil ISTJ
Lawful Evil INTP
He did it!
I am ENFJ and most of my gaming friends told me I am neutral good hahaha. I also agree with most of your explanations, good job sir!
Same, though I often skew Lawful Good 🤣
@@christineherrmann205 I get you! I do have my lawful good side too, you know, the famous "ENFJs fighting injustices" moments lol
Yeah, I'm INFP and I tested chaotic neutral, so I think you're on the money with the skepticism thing
I'm ENTP and my alignment is Chaotic Neutral, it fits well with the self-centered and on a whim actions haha
"ENTPs couldn't care less"
INTPs : "hold my beer"
I as an intj came here thinking I would be placed in true neutral. I wouldn't say I can detach completely but I can force myself to achieve the highest level of objectivity. Well made tier lists in all your vids. Keep up the good work.
As INFJs myself. I take test in D&D Alignment and I fell around Chaotic neutral and Chaotic evil....
edit : I do believed that before I got 'damaged' from society, I'm either neutral good or chaotic good. but after being corrupted and betrayed.
I turned chaotic
SPOT ON! I’m an INTP and I decided to take the test before watching your video. I got both chaotic neutral and true neutral as my highest results (chaotic neutral was higher by 3 points only)
I’m an INTP who always tests as chaotic neutral, but I behave like both chaotic and true neutrals. I think it’s because I am, ultimately, a good-leaning or “chill” chaotic neutral. There are subcategories to the alignments and they help sort out certain discrepancies in the pure descriptions.
I'm INTJ. True Neutral makes sense. I rarely find one side of anything appeally.
This makes perfect sense to me! ~ Nathan
I'm an istp, I've never played or even new the alignment chart came from this game. I got down to 3 possible types, chaotic good, true neutral, and chaotic neutral. And I can't tell which one fits me more.
True Neutral: that makes sense, INTP
Feeling types are marked good, thinking types are neutral or evil.
I can subscribe Intp true neutral.
That's also a very decent reminder that the Good/Evil-allignment might not be as black and white as it suggests (though plenty of old D&D-campaigns just go with that for simplicity); but it's moreso a sort of representation of what your inner values are and also if you, on a more philosophical level, believe in such terms as good/evil to begin with. People in the Good-category still have plenty of opportunity to do wrong, as they ascribe high value to justice and their own morality, which might not fit the justice nor wellbeing of everyone, even if they don't realise that! While people in the Evil-category, with a more cynical and calculating outlook, are still able to manifest those logistical abilities into doing good. Idk, it's a bit hard to explain, but I just feel that there's definite room for expanding the otherwise a bit contrived definitions.
I just did the test before watching the video and it said I am a Neutral Good person, guess you are good at analizing each type xd. -INFJ
same, except i did it way before this video and way before my friends showed me the MBTI personality test.
I AM CHAOTIC NEUTRAL INFJ YE BOIIIII
I took the test too, and as an INFJ myself, I got lawful good. But after reading what it was all about for lawful good, I find myself leaning towards neutral good. I like doing the right thing, but if it's for the greater good, than I will bend a rule or two.
As soon as you described Neutral Good in the beginning, I knew INFJ should sit there. Good job! (Although True Neutral is a possibility as well, the altruistic vision part probably keeps us in the Neutral Good - depends on the day maybe). - INFJ
As an INFP, I’m honestly so happy to be put into Chaotic Good lmao
I identify as Chaotic Neutral even more firmly than I identify as an ENTP, so good job there 👌
Mee too! Definitely, I rather make it clear I am a chaotic neutral... Somehow of a pirate!
@@throughtheblackholetotheli6147 🌊🏴☠️⛵️
ENTJ, I am chaotic neutral with some lawful evil traits (not impulsive, will follow the letter if not necessarily the spirit of contracts/agreements made).
ISTP here, I got chaotic neutral. Seems like some other istps got the same result too.
Yeah
weird I got lawful evil
Gen Z really loves self labelling themselves in strict but totally unscientific systems, then self-proclaime as the most open-minded and inclusive
P.S. the dnd alignment chart is not to be intended as a personality but as way to approach ethic, which can be correlated to your personality but ultimately there are multiple ways of beign chaotic-good or neutral-evil and so on.
Ah yes, nothing says 'open-minded' like fitting ourselves into neatly labeled boxes. It's like wearing a 'Chaotic Neutral' badge while ignoring the irony of being chaotic and needing a label. Guess we all have to rebel in a perfectly structured way, right?
INTP here. I kinda feel like I could be anything from Lawful Good to Chaotic Evil, each category would fit in a way. Soooo yeah, True Neutral kinda sums it up pretty well 🤣
INTP here. I've taken the alignment test before a couple of times and consistently gotten true neutral. I think it has a lot to do with being able to hold multiple perspectives simultaneously and being able to see the harm/good and value/worthlessness of any of those perspectives. Fun video.
Great analysis. I did the alignment test some time ago and got a true neutral. I was watching the video, thinking: if my type gets 'true neutral' - there is no need for a 'how INTJs defy their stereotype' video.
Sounds like a meaningful closure of so called 2020.
True neutral, seems about right. I tend to leave people to their own devices & do my own thing. If someone seeks my help, I can lean towards good. If they seek to get on my bad side, then my bad side they shall receive.
I'm an ISTP and got True Neutral. I think this is fitting. ISTPs could be the rebellious hero (think Wolverine), or they could be the "it's not personal" Contract killer. Or they could simply not give an f, as long as you don't get in their way.
As soon as I saw the Darth Vader image & quote my ENTJ'ness started chanting Vader, Vader! LOL! Nathan this is the best MBTI channel on youtube. Thank you for the insight and laughs.
Yes- ENFJ: with great power comes great responsibility. Spot on.
LOL 🤣
I 100% agree! Your videos are so good, also good in a way that they're good to listen to in the bg while doing something else.
Dude I'm an INFP that got true neutral 😂😂 what happened?? I did the test twice before watching the Video. I thought I was a moral compass, a paragon of virtue and goodness, a...never mind I'm happy with being neutral, because I don't like judging or fighting others🤷♀️
Same here I also got true neutral ajdbsjdh
INFP here, got true neutral, I do love both INTPs/INTJs personalities so maybe I didnt answer accurately...
11:55 Uh oh, bois. He just scrolled down to chaotic evil. Must be ESTPs coming up next.
as an ISTP i feel myself pretty neutral and sometimes evil so this was pretty accurate.. and my sister is INFJ and she is pretty neutral too but good ..
As an INFJ, watching you do these videos is so intellectually satisfying; I always find myself coming to the same conclusions as you & using roughly the same reasoning to get there. It's so interesting how similarly different types think despite the stark differences in our functional stacks :)
ISTP's is so BADASS!!
I'm an INFP that has loved D&D since my teenage years and always play Chaotic Good. Well done Nathan! ps good to see you put my ENTJ mother in lawful Evil, I can't wait to tell her
I'm INTP & I think that we are definitely in the "neutral good" category as long as we're able to fully embrace our INTPness, and chaotic good if we are pressured to conform to a mode of action that is fundamentally illogical...
As an INTJ type person, I can understand being considered a True Neutral aligned character in an RPG. I do find myself very often unconcerned with other people's opinions of whether what I am doing or talking about is 'good' or 'evil', I'm just focused on achieving my goal. When I am a Dungeon Master for an RPG campaign, I find myself equally at home with getting into character role playing a good aligned or an evil aligned NPC.
Also, when it comes to lawful and chaotic, I'm totally situational about that. I'll side with whichever helps me achieve my goal. I value law and order, but certain laws or orders that conflict with what I'm trying to achieve really annoy me and I wish I could dispense with them while I'm after that goal. On the other hand, I find being surrounded by total chaos to be very draining and annoying, but every now and then, I have an impulse to do something spontaneous, or somewhat out of character for me that is like embracing chaos for a bit.
Maybe it's just me, but as an infp, I have always leaned very much into the true neutral. Do to my hate of conflict, and my own cynicism (which isn't really a concrete infp trait, just something I have developed) I have learned to just stay out of everyone's business. If someone needs help, or needs me, I way the pro's and con's of the situation in order to see the possible outcomes. In other words I look at the big picture and make a decision. It usually comes down to the fact of "will this benefit me and the other person at the same time, or will one of us get hurt?" I care deeply about the people I love and am very proud of my emotions and values, but everyone around me always wants me to choose a side, which I hate and refuse to do since everyone has a right to believe what they want and express it as long it doesn't hurt anyone else. In other words, as long as people respect one another, people can get along relatively fine. This doesn't mean they have to like each other, but they do need to respect the other person's opinion and acknowledge it. Keep an open mind if you will. But that philosophy seems illogical to most of my family and friends, especially my dad who is an estj, who I always tend to argue with. Do to this, I don't want anything to do with people anymore unless it benefits me as well in some way since no one can get along. I agree with treebeard. "Side? I'm on nobody's side, because no one is on my side."
INFP here
I took a personality test for alignments once and i got put in Chaotic neutral, which makes a lot of sense, the need to pursue one's goals trough their own rules can be egoistical, yet flexible when growing oneself
Often when one thinks they are being chaotic good they are actually dipping into the not so good direction since it's a pretty slippery slope, it's really a matter of for what you do the things you do.
Because it's right, or because you want it to be right?
This also then spills into the whole "what counts? what they do or what they think they do?"
Where a character (like Thanos, for example) really thinks that what they are doing is the best thing to do, but fail to realize how many evil deeds they do in their wake
As an INTJ the true neutral category is pretty accurate
As an INTP I was hoping you'd put us in true neutral👍
As an ENTP: I am genuinely shocked we weren't put in Evil lmao
I was expecting chaotic evil lol
Yeah,like
The results of the chaos are far important than the chaos itself
I mean,chaos is great and all but we still have a little of empathy about the negative social impacts but... Meh,It is a cicle.
🙄 But Fe is their third function, tho 🤔
So I am
We're not. We're too chaotic to decide on our morals 😄
As soon as you described the types, I immediately thought INTJs would be in the neutral category.
As a INTJ, I thought we were going to be put into chaotic good for our tendency to question. Neutral is better for us
@@itsspoodini the issue is we are the opposite of chaotic. We plan EVERYTHING. Although I do suspect we thrive in chaos due to our rational, yet ordered nature allowing for easy navigation.🤔
@@harrycrosswell2844 we do plan everything and when things are going bad, that's not our happiest place. That's why I had the thought of chaos. I don't know about you, but I can get lost in my head
@@harrycrosswell2844 not that happy is really a feeling for us, more of a thought that went well
@@itsspoodini interesting. I enjoy getting lost in my mind. Even the thoughts most people would dislike I find interesting🤔
esfp, chaotic neutral fits better, at least to me
reason: the extreme selfishness
im chaotic neutral infj because fuck rules and fuck boundaries ima do whatever I want, the government has more often than not horrible leaders and because I would easily betray someone who is not from my really small family and friend circle
nothin gonna stop me boiiiiiiiii
A fellow ESFP, I'm also a chaotic neutral! it's suits us better I'd say :)
All the XXFPs are in chaotic good (and they're the only types to be placed in chaotic good). Kinda agree.
Yes and the Fe Users are all in neutral good or lawful good, and they are the only types placed in. Kind of interesting
Fe Users = XXFJs
Loved the video haha!
Infp Neutral Good here ^^
I am an INTP and i got chaotic/neutral good(which is bc i am a bit nice) but i got true neutral/chaotic neutral as a close second
As an ENTJ, I laughed when my personality type was put in the Lawful Evil category.
I laughed because it's appropriate lol.
If I had to ask myself which 3 I tend to shift from depending on circumstance:
1. Neutral Good when times are easy, I just want to be helpful to others.
2. Chaotic Neutral when I am observing something that I find amusing and not all too invested in.
3. Lawful Evil when times seem hard and things don't go my way, I want the established order so I can feel secure.
Nathan and Luanns Podcast channel (coming soon...) - ua-cam.com/channels/lVazngQxdMPmzb8CVcYzjg.html
Luann's TikTok - vm.tiktok.com/ZStSJ2bx/
Luann's Instagram - @luannknepp
Nathan's Music Channel - ua-cam.com/channels/ATDztfp70XCRd9E-wWYYOA.html
Nathan's Instagram - instagram.com/nathanjglass/
Nathan's Blog - nathanglasswords.medium.com
Thanks for the effort you put into the videos. I think the INTP is true, yes, they can be neutral, especially if you look at the conversations we have with ourselves, presenting both povs at the same time, being neutral can be really possible. Sometimes as u said can be more leaning into one side but overall neutral and objective. (Nice idea for the video) .Also, what is your type (im kinda confused)? And random question, do you think a feely type and thinking type can get along well?
[working on figuring out which type Nathan is]
Great vid! IMO:
Lawful Good: ENFJ, ESFJ
Neutral Good: INFJ, ISFJ
Chaotic Good: ISFP, ENFP, INFP
Lawful Neutral: ISTJ
True Neutral: INTP, ISTP, INTJ
Chaotic Neutral: ENTP, ESFP
Lawful Evil: ENTJ
Neutral Evil: ESTJ
Chaotic Evil: ESTP
I think ISTP has the potential to go either way depending what will serve their purpose!
You have an ESTJ mom? May entropy be in your favor you poor soul
Your mother is an ESTJ, so is mine.
You're an INTP, so am I.
My Enneagram is Type 2, yours probably isn't.
Either way, we're alike, you and I.
I'm married to an INTP and I agree with putting them in true neutral.
I was once told that "lawful" isn't necessarily about legislation but one's moral code (for example, w this in mind I'd consider Robin Hood a lawful good not because he follows the law but because he strictly follows his moral code- steal from the rich to give to the poor)
As an INTJ I'm surprised I wasn't placed in the evil category. But I think neutral is probably accurate now that I think about it.
I was torn between evil and neutral (story of my life) ~ Nathan