Future of Work: Towards Decent Jobs for All?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 чер 2017
- Global economies at all stages of development are going through profound changes in the nature of jobs and labour. Demographic shifts, global influences such as climate change, and technological innovation are shaping the future of work in ways that risk creating a mismatch between today’s training and tomorrow’s employment options. How can nations anticipate the jobs of the future to ensure that workers receive appropriate skills development while safeguarding their right to decent work? And will Japan be ready for the work of the future?
In this video, International Labour Organisztion Director-General Guy Ryder joins UNU Research Officer Cale Salih for a conversation discussing these pressing questions on the future of work, along with their pertinence to the Sustainable Development Goals.
About the speaker
Guy Ryder has served as ILO Director-General since October 2012, and was recently re-elected for a second term, which will commence in October 2017. Prior, he served as ILO Executive Director. Ryder has also had a distinguished career as General Secretary of both the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions and its successor organisation, the International Trade Union Confederation. He has headed international trade union delegations to high-level talks with the UN, the International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank, amongst others.
Ryder studied Social and Political Sciences at the University of Cambridge, and Latin American Studies at the University of Liverpool. He speaks English, Spanish, and French
Hi, Dears friends, it is great for me following all news from You, thanks,
The work history pays hourly wages, as the worker previously worked more than eight hours to get more wages. In the new system, he works eight hours and receives a monthly wage according to the contract. If we ask about the number of jobs in the world and the number of workers who work with this system, we will find that the system is old, the jobs are few, the wages are weak, and the workers are few. And because there is a lot of need for work and the lack of jobs, there is a problem and this is what we want to talk about. There are many job seekers and there are few businesses and the system is old and has been completed Amending it in this way due to the same problem and we want to reconsider a new amendment to the system The system of work and workers. The worker works eight hours in our present time, does he do the required work? Does he work all eight hours? From here we will start. The duration of working hours on the previously amended system to be suitable for the worker’s ability to work, rest and return to work again, and for the employer, he wants the work to continue without interruption. The worker must stop to rest, and the employer seeks to not stop the work. What if we reconcile between the two sides at an intersection point that gives the worker and satisfies the employer, which is the working hours. The working hours have been reduced to eight hours, so what happens if we re-reduce the working hours from eight hours to three hours? It is a new amendment, what is the result? The worker will get enough time to rest and we will get more workers in the same job, competition will increase and skills at work will be highlighted, the worker’s accounting will become more accurate, we will ensure that all working hours work correctly and the owner is more familiar with the business and we will solve the problem of lack of work so that we have work One is three workers instead of one, and this is if we work only nine hours. It is noted that the workers do not work at the present time for eight hours, but the real evaluation of the work indicates that they actually work only three hours, and this is likely to modify the work of the worker to the proposed amendment. In view of the business continuity, which the employer seeks and demands comfort for the worker, it is also an old system, so why stop working? Because you have one worker in this job and he must get a rest to return to work, why shouldn't there be more than one worker in this job? With this, we can make the work continue. The working hours must be reduced to three hours, so that the worker works three hours and then leaves, so that there is another worker who works three hours and leaves, and so on... This solves the problem of unemployment and scarcity of work. We must mention the wage system, as it is monthly, so why does it not become weekly? So that the worker receives his wages every two weeks. The monthly system has become long, and the worker looks at the middle of the month, a difficult time for his requirements, as it is an opportunity for adjustment and motivation. Thank you
14-17 years of age is good for a part time job an 18 years of age full time jobs
...for all that will still be alive!!...
Change the jobs from 8 hours to 3 hours and send it for 24 hours. Each job will have 3 employees. If 24 hours each job will have 9 employees . That means everyone will have job.
That's starvation it would not pay for a roof and food nevermind other essentials.
the ILO help me get a jod
Well how does he intend that more migrants won't raise housing prices in a diminishing stock already and they under cut wages as employers just get a recruitment agency to hire desperate forigners for peanuts instead of raises to attract workers.