SHANKARI PRASAD CASE - Simple Case Analysis in 6 mins - Shankari Prasad vs Union of India Case 1951

[@palakrajput2863]

Very clearly explained 👍

[@LawPlanet]

Thank you 😊

[@kanishkadas9290]

This judgement may be conservative but it's good for the state.

[@Hanumanjikibhkt777]

Thnx

[@ashutoshswaraj9750]

Thank you ❤

[@saurabhsingh-gg9tc]

Appreciate brother 👍 I'm your batchmate Saurabh

[@LawPlanet]

Hi Saurabh, thanks for the appreciation 😊🙏

[@myholythought6247]

Thank you so much mam sir

[@LawPlanet]

You're welcome 😊🙏

[@AnitaBharti-b5o]

thankyou ❤

[@LawPlanet]

You're welcome

[@pardeepliddher5501]

Nice explanation 👌

[@teshiatech2187]

Sarkar ko akal to pehle se thi but Nehru government power ful thi. Jab Nehru gov hat gayi tab jake supreme Court ne golakhnath case me sahi decision diya mere bhai.

[@aftabiraki5244]

Or ek ews pr v bana dijia sir sinho commission v please

[@SantoshYadav-px1mo]

This explanation was so good

[@danushtvdass4140]

Mam I hv doubt how shankari prasad case is related to jurisprudence

[@jdtvnews9271]

Law of property

[@fahima6993]

Can I get this in English?

[@Nikhil-nj6jr]

Gardening with jagat👈

[@SaGaR__69]

Mam iski pdf kha ha

[@vaibhavsharma7286]

अगर 1951 से 1967 के बीच में अगर कोई सरकार paliament से fundamental rights को ध्वस्त करती और आम आदमी के अधिकार छीन लेती, तब क्या supreme court कुछ नही कर सकता था?
क्योंकि सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने ही तो आज़ादी दी थी parliament को कि वो art 368 के तहत कोई भी कानून बनाये।

[@LawPlanet]

कई बार सूप्रीम कोर्ट भी सरकार के दबाव में रहकर उनके विरूद्ध जाने में कतराता है

[@aftabiraki5244]

Sir m nagraj v bana dijia please

[@ishikakhanna3871]

Ok

[@khushivyahut]

Aap pure Hindi me kyu nhi bolte

[@himanshugarg1089]

Yes

[@Mahajan-ow6vw]

Sc ko Aakl ahye 😂 author can be held liable for criminal contempt