Making Sense Of Meaning | Jordan B. Peterson
Вставка
- Опубліковано 12 лис 2020
- For the books referenced in this clip please see the links below. By choosing to use these links you are directly supporting this channel and future content. We thank you for your continued support.
Jaak Panksepp - Affective Neuroscience: amzn.to/2hHrOti
Jeffery Gray - The Neuropsychology of Anxiety: amzn.to/2imYN6F
Other ways to connect with Dr. Peterson:
Join the JBP newsletter: mailchi.mp/jbpdaily/jbp-weekl...
Podcast: jordanbpeterson.com/podcast/
Instagram: / jordan.b.peterson
Facebook: / drjordanpeterson
Direct Support: www.jordanbpeterson.com/donate/
Written by Dr. Peterson:
12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos: www.jordanbpeterson.com/12-ru...
Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief: www.jordanbpeterson.com/maps-...
this man changed my life. anyone else
yep
Everyone else
Yes - I'm very grateful for his work
Yes one of the greatest things to happen was to find his lectures. He introduced me not only to his own teachings, but to the teachings of Jung, Freud, Piaget and most prominently of all, he allowed me to find God; after watching his biblical series.
Yup
A man like this comes along but once in two or three lifetimes, may be more. He is surely a hero in the classical sense. His reputation will grow. I have got so much out of following him. He should be nominated for a Nobel prize. He is far more worthy than many of the recipients (no disrespect to them intended) we have seen in recent times. My 11 year old son likes to listen to him too. I expect it to stand him in good stead as he evolves into adulthood. Thank you for everything you have done Jordan B Peterson.
Well said.. a simply brilliant mind
He is an honest intellectual.
I agree for the most part. Just a shame he can't be more honest on the more difficult taboos
@@Ryan-xo6tj
Elaborate.
@@Lightnings The Globalists/Left will definitely win if we don't embrace Identity politics.
@@Ryan-xo6tj
That literally makes zero sense.
Contradictory, to say the least.
@@Lightnings CBA to spell it out for you so I'll just send you this www.bitchute.com/video/AOTvbgfK43rX/
Essentially radical individualism doesn't give you meaning and has lead to the destruction of the West.
Peterson is right on a lot of things, but he's wrong about Individualism.
Peterson is a treasure. There are few people who communicate without a self benefitting agenda like JPB does but, one get's the feeling that he really is after the truth, regardless of where that search leads. The ideologically possessed that he abhors seem to have no concept of this, that's why I love him.
Well he's certainly profitting from it. On a variety of points, there's a whole spectrum of benefits opening up for him.
But I feel like he does deserve it after all and he _does_ seem to be after the Truth. To make the world a better place.
So more power to him, as far as I'm concerned eh?
Thank you for posting. Always exciting.
It's powerful to intersect the potentially esoteric feeling of "being in the right place at the right time" with the conscious decision and process of enacting one's personal responsibility in manifesting their best in the world.
How do you know you are doing what you are best equipped to do?
Well, you'll feel it.
Simple - elegant - useful
He's our contemporary Salomon.
In terms of wisdom, I would say.
Except that he's desperately in love with his wife and there is no one else for him. But other than that, yes.
@@jenniferlawrence1372 that's it
@@jenniferlawrence1372
Is that so bad after all? ;)
I personally would love a relationship like that. Firm and grounded.
But obviously, never give up yourself completely for someone else. Which I don't think he did, because he _tried_ to carry on.
It's easier said than done, to make yourself not dependent on anyone else. I do aim for that.
We're human after all.
@@Lightnings Not sure why you would think that is bad or that I was saying it was bad? Oh what sad times are these when I need to specifically state that faithfulness to one’s spouse is a GOOD thing. (referencing Roger The Shrubber there)
@@jenniferlawrence1372
Read the conversation again.
Fabulous clip! Always invigorating!
I love how this segment ends with Dr. P walking off into the shadows, still speaking ....
Perfect 💕
glad to see him back
Keep at it JP , thanks for everything.
So glad to hear you once again
Vital engagement in being and the play circuit! You speak a language that reaches people at their absolute core. Thank you for pointing me to Jakk Panksepp, Doc. So glad to see you back on the scene.
Love this guy.
Dr Peterson got my attention, I can say that for sure. An articulate individual that speaks common sense, with a firm enough grasp on the currents in the flow of life, to inspire the need for discussion.
One of a kind. Bless him.
I am 4th... I rejoice to know you are getting better Dr. Peterson.
I'm really glad to get more book recommendations off him in these emails, I've really loved some books he has suggested before like Solzhenktsyn's, The Rape of Nanking and The road to Wigan pier. Though, the most important for me has certainly been discovering Carl Jungs work through him
Oh my gosh he's wearing a lobster tie. But more seriously, "Do what is meaningful, not what is expedient" is probably the most meaningful (pardon the pun), of the 12 Rules (or 42) to me. I don't need to be told to pet a cat, it's in my DNA, like I came out of the womb and made a beeline for the nearest kitty. I never encounter a kid on a skateboard. But I regularly, daily, nay, hourly, struggle with choosing the meaningful over the expedient, even when the meaningful is that which will actually be better for me and make me happier. I don't know if it's the human condition but it's definitely my condition.
What are you referring to when you mention that you never see a kid on a skateboard
Our sense of humanity quite sublime , people emotion get to be obstinate in reason , others apprehend and impulsive , to different angle of character ...... God bless Professor Jordan Peterson !
This man single handedly made me understand the world as it is..
Very interesting
Dr Peterson really helped me better engage the societal aspects of the insanity that is postmodernism. And he helped me better understand the psychological dimension to the Aristotelian and Aquinas' philosophical realism which I hold actually shows the action of God in the world by reason alone. His psychology dovetails perfectly with the Personal ground of existence itself in God. Great stuff.
Yes, it is our human nature/instinct/intuition and awareness. Perhaps, it’s improved as we evolve but it certainly isn’t new. Luv ya Jordan ✝️❤️😘
I just like listening to him because he is always exploring what's already deep within for meaning and benefit for all. He is used by God indeed.
Arrived early!
When expediency is watching JBP direct you back towards meaning
Great art on the thumbnail btw !
Man this guy
No I think the wisdom he possessed and shared with me did. The man is a pure vehicle for the truth and wisdom he shares. I dare not put another man on a pedestal too high he can't get off.
Jordan B Peterson taught us the nature of suffering and it's natural for us human being to have such thing. Lord Buddha had done many contribution to nature of suffering and nirvana (free from suffering). He stated that attachment is the root cause of suffering. Same goes by as Jordan B Peterson linked the evolutionary part with the nature of suffering. He stated that it's meaning that sustain us in this suffering journey. And I can't say much more on this because I too haven't understand this whole thing about psychology in a more advanced way.
Does anyone know from which talk it has been taken?? thanks a lot
Link to full lecture?
He was sorely missed!
What is the meaning of the meaning of asking the meaning of the meaning of asking the meaning of meaning of the meaning of meaning?
What do you mean by that?
I think you can make strong argument for religion becouse of that. If sense of meaning is deep instintc, and does not have it fundaments in thought and reason, nothing fits as Great the ultimate meaning as religion.
Can you put the original source for this speech in the description for us, please?
that would be very helpful indeed
Its the latest speech he did last month. There is 2 of them on UA-cam.
Here it is:
ua-cam.com/video/dPv1RYsi7sA/v-deo.html
@@KENTUCKYUSA1 thank you!
So what's the difference between instinct and intuition ?
Does anyone know how many books his read?
The great JP$$$$
I think he meant Jaak’s “Archaeology of Mind”
What are the books he just mentioned?
Affective neuroscience
by Jaak Panksepp
The neuropsychology of anxiety
by Jeffrey Alan Gray.
LISTENING TO YOUR INTELLECTUAL KNOWLEDGE HAS BEEN MY ROUTINE LATELY.....THE MORE I LISTEN TO YOU THE MORE I WANT TO HERE OF WHATEVER YOU WANT TO SHARE.....IM MY MIND YOU ARE SO A STRONG MINDED AND VERY INTELLIGENT...A GOOD LECTURER...AN “ORATOR”....i CAN JUST FEEL YOUR STRONG ENERGY FROM WITHIN YOU EVERY TIME YOU GIVE A SPEAK.....IT’S VERY MAGNETIC...MAKE ME WANNA LISTEN MORE...THANK YOU JORDAN,.....HOPEFULLY I CAN SEE YOU IN MELBOURNE - MY BEAUTIFUL HOMETOWN....EARLY NEXT YEAR....THANK YOU. Ⓜ️MO’S ART ▶️ MELBOURNE
CAPITAL LETTERS are very hard to read, and your comments are valuable, so I fixed it with respect.
listening to your intellectual knowledge has been my routine lately
The more I listen to you the more I want to hear of whatever you want to share
in my mind, you are so a strong-minded and very intelligent, a good lecturer and “orator.”
I can just feel your strong energy from within you every time you give a speech.
it’s very magnetic...make me wanna listen more...thank you Jordan
.hopefully I can see you in Melbourne - my beautiful hometown....early next year....thank you. Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart
@@VaughanMcCue Hi Vaughan Thank you so so much for this. I respect and appreciated your kindness in “re-typing” my comments. I was not aware of this capital letters issue. I thought it was the other way around. Thank you my friend.....☮️🌏Ⓜ️MO - ▶️ Melbourne
those tracks go way back, there's riddles all along, were they-just-kissin'-to-be-clever?
4:32 If meaning is "instinct that guides you", then what are values. I always thought values are what guides you in life. And values can be articulated, instincts not so much.
could you make space for both?
Interesting. I would like this question to be discussed.
@@bastiwmr Values and beliefs are not instincts, they are taught, and inculcated through culture.
@@JohnSmith-zo6irI would say this definition of values is predicated on a poor understanding of both value and culture. Values are nearly inseperavle from intuitions.
@@KissellMissile The definition of culture is a group of people with shared values and beliefs. So values underpin culture. Instincts are innate.
Interesting. Yes, we almost certainly have an instinct to create meaning. If we don't reflect on our 'meanings', then they can probably call them products of our instincts alone. But most of us question and think about our meanings and often consciously adapt them. Most importantly, our meanings are human creations; they are not absolute meanings. We are so conditioned by our instinct to create meanings that we often believe there are meanings outside of ourselves. I believe that is an illusion.
🙌🏽💎🔥😎
Making sense of meaning
Making meaning of sense
Making meaning of memeing
Memeing memeing of memeing
It's just Jordans personality if you take a meyers briggs test they ask you things about how much you like structure and discipline etc. He's smart and well educated too but lots of his teaching are obviously reflective of his own lifestyle preferences.
Wow. Memories are not to remember the past. It’s to remember what to do for the future.
First
first on the first. how bout dat
the hyenas, would love to be mistaken for wolves, but they seem to despise the wolves, even tho they got so much in common.. is that racism tho? they love their own kind, of course they do~ but did they give us good questions?
How's drug addiction Jordan?
Jesus said unto him, “I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life; no man cometh unto the Father, but by Me." - John 14:6
The second coming of Jordan Peterson.
Briefly: on one page.
We are in a benevolent, predatory, form of martial law from DC/United States* incorporated governance, in some form, since 1861. It’s Name is the Lieber Code from Lincoln’s Executive order 100 in color of law. We had a Constitutional Republican form of government from 1819 to 1860 or 1861. From 1776 to 1819 it was changing from an overthrown Monarchy. Most of the “people from 1776 to 1819 the people at large” were not convinced for a long time. There really in an active conspiracy, the industrial/military/judicial/legislative/executive/banker/ BAR/royalist/communist/muslim/Georgia Guide stone complex.
This does not involve the true Constitutional Republican form of government on each of the several states. As long as there are still “people” the body, mind, spirit as juxtaposed to “person” the ALL CAP NAME corporate fiction. All power is inherent in the people.
Each state is an autonomous Nation, not a subdivision of the US inc., each with its own Constitution. All power is inherent in the people. The number of people is not specified and a majority is not required as we are not a Democracy. The several states of the union are the creator party to “The United States of America’s Constitution.” The “people at large” are beneficiaries. The “people at large” are the creator party to the State’s Constitutions.
The STATE OF OREGON's incorporated governance is color of law. Operated by the Salem oligarchy aka Kate Brown et al...That is a subdivision of the DC/United States* as originally incorporated during Lincoln’s era.
I think each STATE OF THE OTHER 49 is about the same. A Little more carrot or a little more stick.
To remove the Lieber Code/martial law the method is clear and written down by the de facto. The Lieber code of Lincoln's EO 100 is nullified by a civilian court on the land. So says SCOTUS Ex parte Milligan. There was no, none, zero civilian courts on the land of Oregon. Until ours. I was told there is one on Texas, one in Philadelphia and one on Georgia. I have been unable to prove this. I do know there is no Article III court that will claim original jurisdiction. They have acquiesced to "we must do it ourselves."
The Army Heritage Center 717 245 3972/3949 verified the Lieber Code was updated and still in effect in 2015. No known changes since then. The JAG , Judge Advocate General, attorney knew exactly what I was talking about.
A method of returning Oregon to a Constitutional Republican form of government was/is: We assembled our 1st amendment Oregon Statewide Jural Assembly 3 years ago. We notified the DOJ, USMS, FBI, 36 Sheriffs, 30 Senators, A.G, governor, SoS lawfully and none rebutted our claim, they all acquiesced and defaulted.
We formed Article I Section 1 of Oregon's Constitution and informed all the same ones. We formed our civilian court of record and informed all the same ones. We notified all the same ones; that thru Ex parte Milligan's authority we nullified Lieber Code/martial law. Not one rebuttal.
We informed the Oregon National Guard/Oregon Organized Militia's JAG and they are not happy and have talked back and hung up. We are awaiting an appointment with their Commanding General Michael Stencel.
We are forming a 45 member Grand jury pool and trial jury pool of Oregonians non-US citizens, to bring forth true bills against the evil doers on Oregon. Then implement Article III Amendment VII.
Ex parte Milligan, 71 U.S. (4 Wall.) 2 (1866), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court that ruled the application of military tribunals to citizens when civilian courts are still operating is unconstitutional. In this particular case, the Court was unwilling to give President Abraham Lincoln's administration the power of military commission jurisdiction, part of the administration's controversial plan to deal with Union dissenters during the American Civil War. Justice David Davis, who delivered the majority opinion, stated that "martial rule can never exist when the courts are open" and confined martial law to areas of "military operations, where war really prevails", and when it was a necessity to provide a substitute for a civil authority that had been overthrown. Chief Justice Salmon P. Chase and three associate justices filed a separate opinion concurring with the majority in the judgment, but asserted that Congress had the power to authorize a military commission, although it had not done so in Milligan's case.
The landmark case stemmed from a trial by a military commission of Lambdin P. Milligan (for whom the case is named), Stephen Horsey, William A. Bowles, and Andrew Humphreys that convened at Indianapolis on October 21, 1864. The charges against the men included, among others, conspiracy against the U.S. government, offering aid and comfort to the Confederates, and inciting rebellion. On December 10, 1864, Milligan, Bowles, and Horsey were found guilty on all charges and sentenced to hang. Humphreys was found guilty and sentenced to hard labor for the remainder of the war. (The sentence for Humphreys was later modified, allowing his release; President Andrew Johnson commuted the sentences for Milligan, Bowles, and Horsey to life imprisonment.) On May 10, 1865, Milligan's legal counsel filed a petition in the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Indiana at Indianapolis for a writ of habeas corpus, which called for a justification of Milligan's arrest. A similar petition was filed on behalf of Bowles and Horsey. The two judges who reviewed Milligan's petition disagreed about the issue of whether the U.S. Constitution prohibited civilians from being tried by a military commission and passed the case to the U.S. Supreme Court. The case was argued before the Court on March 5 and March 13, 1866; its decision was handed down on April 3, 1866.
Prepared by Francis Lieber, promulgated as General Orders No. 100 by President Lincoln, 24 April 1863. Instructions for the Government of Armies of the United States in the Field, prepared by Francis Lieber, LL.D., Originally Issued as General Orders No. 100, Adjutant General's Office, 1863, Washington 1898: Government Printing Office.
Article I Section 1 of Oregon’s Constitution Natural rights inherent in people.We declare that all men, when they form a social compact are equal in right: that all power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority, and instituted for their peace, safety, and happiness; and they have at all times a right to alter, reform, or abolish the government in such manner as they may think proper. -
*See www.oregonlaws.org/ors/79.0307 (8) The United States is located in the District of Columbia.
Russian have great neuropsychologist because they are not so 'hung up' on social constructionism and woke ideas - they actually believe that nature and nurture work together as influences not only on people but, in the additive, also on whole societies...
He could just say "engaging positive progress in life" and it would still be much shorter than his definition at the beginning but would actually be understandable as opposed to the completely unparsable usage of the word "meaning". In this context there is zero relevance to its more common definition. (that of a synonym with the word "definition").
I would guess you don't read much philosophy or epistemology if you think "definition" is the common usage for "meaning." It might be in common usage, but that is clearly not in view here.
...are we just gonna pretend that reference to the "one-eyed monster" never happened?
There is no meaning to life. You have to be ignorant or religious to believe otherwise😶
... Do benzodiazepines help one have vital engagement in being?
Yr a low life. But I suspect on some level you already knew that.
''without chemicals, life itself would be impossible'', but even the cleanest water can be one of the most dangerous 'chemicals' if you think of it that-a-way
Nice
@@jamesharris184 ... James Harris, did you know that anybody would be safer using opium and Coca, t h a n they would using benzodiazepines? I am just trying to keep our beloved dr. Peterson safe. Oh, and educate you.
@@joedavis4150 we both know you took a cheap shot. Clearly you are angry, and I'm not in a position to know why. Did dr. Peterson misgender you? If he did, it wasn't intentional. He clearly stated he wouldn't do that; and nor would I for that matter. Have a lovely day. R u aware that in the aggregate dr. Peterson has had close to 1 billion downloads. The man resonates with people and he is on to something. Truth has power. But I suppose you already know this, since you are here.