Why You Should Fly the Cessna 414 Chancellor in Microsoft Flight Simulator
Вставка
- Опубліковано 19 вер 2023
- Today we look at why you should fly the Cessna 414 Chancellor by FlySimWare in Microsoft Flight Simulator, taking the plane on a flight from Boston Logan International Airport up to Bar Harbor, Maine.
- Ігри
I heard someone (AvAngel maybe?) describe the difference between the 310R and the 414 as, “The 310R is the plane to fly when you want to go anywhere. The 414 is the plane to fly when you want to go somewhere.”
loved this video, I appreciate the walk through of everything you're doing. great stuff man!
As a cape air virtual pilot, I see this as an absolute win!
Is there a discord? I fly bar harbor to Boston all the time for concerts. Glad I found this video
@@YeahImAnthony do you use VATSIM by chance?
@@MerryArbitrary no I don't, just getting back into msfs. I can do circuits and small trips, but have no idea what I'm doing.
Hey, glad to see ya back. We've missed the Monday evening flights. Hopefully you can get back to those.
Great flight and great aircraft. I gave you a sub! Keep up the good work 👍
I love flying this plane! Good video.
BTW, the autopilot master button and control panel are in the center console, above the cowl flaps.
I love the 414 thanks for sharing
Great video! And a great landing! I think I’m gonna buy this one.
Thank-you for a most enjoyable C414 flight. My name is Guerry, I am relatively new to MSFS, and I enjoy videos like yours in order to learn. Currently, I have upgraded from the C152 to flying Carenado’s C182 RG to further develop my flying skills, since for many reasons, I am not a big fan of the C172.
Given your flight was relatively routine, I am pressed for comments and questions related to it. However, it seems your GA aircraft of choice is the C310 (I have already viewed your earlier videos). Would you please brief me as to why you prefer it over the other twins available on MSFS? Once I have developed my MSFS skills to the point where I will enjoy flying a twin, I keep an eye out for one that will exploit the capabilities of MSFS the best. As of now, the C310 does appear to be the most comprehensive choice. However, Carenado’s C337 does look inviting. As an extension to my question, have you looked at that aircraft? If so, please give me your thoughts.
Again, thank you for the video. I look forward to viewing your next post.
Welcome to the wonderful world of Microsoft Flight Simulator. A good single engine GA is the Just Flight Piper series. They have an Archer along with the Piper Arrow and Turbo Arrow. These are well made GA aircraft to help
You with your journey.
The 310 and 414 are very good, although I see that there is a lot of difference between the two in the flight model.
The 310 is much more nervous, I don't know if this is the case in reality...
The 310 is twitchy, especially in pitch, according to many. The MilViz C310R is challenging to fly but I believe it is intentional. Still my favorite addon to date
Hey, I live in Boston and actually work for JetBlue so I’m in that area and see the cape air planes almost everyday, I’m wondering what graphic mod you have for Logan airport in the game it is extremely accurate
Cape Air uses Cessna 402C's not 404's
How do you turn on that green nav screen?
What ATC are you using mate? That's so cool
He's using Vatsim which has you actually talking to other people who are acting as ATC.
Its on sale for $23 in sim marketplace.
How did you turn on the avionics?
Thank you for the vidéo… just a question. What atc you used ? It’s vatsim, ivao, or pilot2atc or other ? Thank for your reply
Vatsim, he states it in the beginning
My rpm in my right engine drops miserably at cruise no idea why
I have a 1981 Cessna 414a POH on pdf if you desire, just holler if you'd like a copy emailed to you. it's based of the TSIO-520-NB. engines same as the sim, you'd made a mistake and said type J in the video. created link below.
You say it handles nicely, but nicely in comparison to what? Because what I see is that it's sensitive and twitchy on the controls just like pretty much every other MSFS aircraft, except for the Comanche. The way you were all over the runway on take off roll and how the nose was going up and down so much on approach really says it all.
I agree, it did look twitchy. I have the same problem with my aircraft although I suspect much can be fixed with tweaking the controls. For example when I turn off the autopilot, the aircraft suddenly pitches up or down and this may be something to do with the trim. I would have thought real aircraft when coming off autopilot would continue to fly stable. But going back to your video and in respect of the reply comment your aircraft did seem as he said, twitchy. Can you reply to this and give a reason….maybe your sensitivity of your yoke may need adjusting to that particular aircraft. Before I finish, I have a Brunner yoke and when I first flew the King Air analog from black square the control of the aircraft is pretty firm, except like I mentioned before, switch off the autopilot makes the aircraft pitch up or down and I must then stable the aircraft with trim.
The reason is your hardware probably does not have as much travel as the real one. The real one has a lot of travel so you can make really fine adjustments. I find the same on the c152, chipmunk, etc...
@@diacidos Less travel and precision in the controls on your desk vs the real plane is one thing, but I'm using the cheap T1600 stick and even with this entry level stick the Comanche feels very precise to control, unlike any other plane I've tried in MSFS.
@@davidtsw that is because comanche uses 3rd party software for your flight model. I don´t know if you have ever flown a real airplane but if you do wide movements it will be twitchy aswell.
What's the navigraph thing to make it look like a tablet?
This is a PC review? The stuttering gives it away.