Sounded very good, and considering how many people don't say anything, better than good. Once a small town is ruined by greed, there is no turning back.
@Real_WickedWitch_ofthe_West First off, let me say that you were fantastic at the podium. Yes, it is a 4th Amendment violation to require that you divulge personal information to speak at a public meeting. By giving you name and possibly address in a meeting that may be televised, you just may be telling would be robbers, that you're not home. That chills your ability to be scure in your person, home and effects.
@@LibertyWarrior1776 thank you! I looked into this a lot more since your first post and found that they absolutely need to provide alternative methods - requiring it before being allowed to speak is very likely a violation. Thank you for sharing with me - learning more every day. Appreciate the kind words!
@@Real_WickedWitch_ofthe_West Deep Dive into the Constitution is kinda my thing. People need to read and thoroughly understand Article VI Clause II before they take a single step into Municipal or Statutory Law. Once you understand what you are Actually dealing with, it puts you on more solid footing to formulate a game plan.
Colorado native here and Colorado has become an absolute sh!t show. I feel your pain greatly. I have moved to a farm in Kentucky just to get away from big brother Jefferson county telling me what’s good for me. Keep going. 🕊️🤍
Sounded very good, and considering how many people don't say anything, better than good. Once a small town is ruined by greed, there is no turning back.
Thanks so much! If we used our voices as much as we used our money we could have such an impact
We shouldn't have to give our identity at these damn meetings. It leaves us vulnerable. Great job, though!
It’s against the constitution to demand that you provide your address at a public meeting. They are violating your fourth amendment right to do so.
I didn’t know that but I absolutely HATED that they did that. It’s a way of silencing people imho
@Real_WickedWitch_ofthe_West First off, let me say that you were fantastic at the podium.
Yes, it is a 4th Amendment violation to require that you divulge personal information to speak at a public meeting. By giving you name and possibly address in a meeting that may be televised, you just may be telling would be robbers, that you're not home. That chills your ability to be scure in your person, home and effects.
@@LibertyWarrior1776 thank you! I looked into this a lot more since your first post and found that they absolutely need to provide alternative methods - requiring it before being allowed to speak is very likely a violation.
Thank you for sharing with me - learning more every day. Appreciate the kind words!
@@Real_WickedWitch_ofthe_West Deep Dive into the Constitution is kinda my thing.
People need to read and thoroughly understand Article VI Clause II before they take a single step into Municipal or Statutory Law. Once you understand what you are Actually dealing with, it puts you on more solid footing to formulate a game plan.
@@LibertyWarrior1776 off to deep dive into that article - thank you again! Love learning from folks like you!
Colorado native here and Colorado has become an absolute sh!t show. I feel your pain greatly. I have moved to a farm in Kentucky just to get away from big brother Jefferson county telling me what’s good for me. Keep going. 🕊️🤍