Your DNA is Deteriorating!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 22 сер 2024
- Is this better than watching paint dry?
Support me on Patreon: www.patreon.co...
Follow me on Twitter: / stickprofessor
Become a Member: / @professorstick
Check out my merch: teespring.com/...
Original Video: • Video
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FAIR USE NOTICE:
This video may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
![Дон ДОН, Алаудинов и СБЕЖАВШИЕ из под Курска ахматовцы 😁 [Пародия]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dEfCf5IK26Q/mqdefault.jpg)
He’s literally saying that the mutations that are specifically harmless will eventually kill us all
He keeps using that word neutral, but it doesn't mean what he thinks it means. He keeps talking like neutral mutations have an effect and result in information loss but they still don't do either of those things.
He's so fixed on that "typographical error" wording, that the forgot the meaning of "neutral"...
Which kind of debunks a intelligent designer,
Why would "god" allow that.
But as thier is no god it's a small problem that all living things have to live with but its going to take a very long time before it really becomes a problem, earth probably be long dead by then
Wouldn't we all dead by now if he was right? Or did I miss that part?
@@TheOneGreat Remember he thinks the world is only 6,000 years old...
The Professor Stick rebuttal is a great way to start the day.
I second this
My day is over. So a great way to finish the day…it’s almost 1130pm. Lol
A great way to end the day too
Last time someone attacked me here when I said something like that.
Really weird
Agreed.
"100-200 typographical errors we didn't have." Him calling a mutation an error says everything.
I think it's fair to call genetic mutations that lead to a Matt Powell an error.
Do you actually expect him to understand the difference? A person that honestly believes that entropy is "the end of all existence"? He has a five year old's understanding of terms and no matter how many times he is corrected on his false assumptions and bad understanding of what words mean, he doesn't change his spiel.
Then again, he can't afford to. He has no marketable skills outside scamming the uneducated and easily deluded. If he was ever forced to admit he just doesn't know what he's talking about, how else would he live outside the donations scammed from people for fear of their immortal souls not having a good day hanging out with a definitely-real sky-daddy? He preys on fear and uneducation, like religion has always done.
This im**cile with 100-200 errors removed his vid or closed access to it lol.
@@beepboop8184 Yup, he does that with every video that is responded to. Privates it for 2 weeks so people won't comment. He doesn't want any outsiders on his channel, only sheep.
@@Axymerion His bravery at confronting and dealing with criticism is as commendable as his father's security standards.
My DNA might not be deteriorating, but it sure feels like it is after watching videos like those.
Matt shows that humans are not necessarily getting smarter.
@@cmbrown3817 we are evolving….. some people evolve backwards lol
Cocojam Devolving. 😉
What is really happening is that Matt is under the delusion that there is a perfect archetype of humans that we are moving away from. That is why he is confused about neutral mutations, which neither make one more or less fit… Wonder where he got that impression from?
From the Bible. Humans created in god's image, that kind of nonsense...
@@Falanwe exactly… isn’t it funny how they take their prejudices from their religion and just take it for granted that science must conform to them. In reality, of course, natural selection is entirely plastic and doesn’t have any kind of fixed goal.
@@Falanwe Yeah, and then sin mysteriously inverted our retinas to the imperfect kind of eye, an imperfection God would never, ever create, where retinas are BEHIND the nerve wiring instead of in front! Sin inverted the retinas, as easily as you can turn the skin of an orange inside-out without breaking it. Oh, wait, that's not easy at all!
So, he must be REALLY imperfect as we were brown/black, as was "God's son" and this dude's white. Can we even class him as human, by his logic?!?!? :-D
@@ChrispyNut, "No JeSuS wAs WhItE: aLl MeDiEvAl PaInTiNgS sAy So!"
That paint drying had way more intelligent arguments than flat earthers do
Far more intelligent than Matt Powell anyway
Flat earthers? How are they relevant here?
@@irrelevant_noob watch the start of the video
Matt Powell has accumulated enough mutations that he now is able to be wrong multiple times on the same argument. Progress!
If there is an Intelligent Designer, why is there a Matt Powell?
If the earth is young, why are Matts arguments so infinitely old?
Okay, okay, I won't touch anything on Matt anymore. That's Hovind's responsibility now :D
💯^ XDXDXD
You forgot to mention the inflatable banana he keeps in his yard that he refers to as Dr. Peel.
@@schrodingerthecat That's because Matt is now the inflatable banana of Kent Hovind ;)
@@TheOneSin7 does Kent blow Matt up?
@@c.guydubois8270 I think Matt is blown up enough already.
What I love about Matt Powell is his absolute confidence about illiteracy among the "UA-cam Atheists" coming from someone who was home-schooled (which depending upon the curriculum can be good or bad) and thinks the sun requires air in space to burn!. Additionally he thought the Confederates fought pterodactyl's in the Civil War!
I tend to view Matt Powell as a living embodiment of Matryoshka doll for the Dunning Kruger Effect.
Don't forget that he also called on the US government to execute gay people. Really, that tells you all you need to know about him.
@@TheOwlman I wanted to make the joke about him and the giant inflatable banana in his backyard, but thats just disturbing.
@@RuneDrageon I enjoyed that joke after Dan posted his video, right up to the point that I found out more about him! I do still have a habit of referring to him as 'banana boy', but that is just to show contempt :~D
@@TheOwlman I had forgotten about that which makes him a truly a loathsome individual.
He also thinks that palaeontologists say humans all descended from African Americans(!)
"If evolution removes bad things from the gene pool, why do creationists like me exist? Check mate!"
-"I believe that God created me in one day!"
-"Yeah, looks like he rushed it..."
Bill Hicks
Because contrary to popular belief, natural selection is not survival of the fittest, it's more elimination of the not fit enough. Above the threshold, everything is fair game. If you're not literally too dumb to survive, you're fine from evolution's point of view.
Also, being rational is not that big of an evolutionary advantage. It's far less important than being able to recognize threats fast for instance. For natural selection, being paranoiac is better than thoroughly analyzing things.
@@Falanwe Obviously.
Except to creationists.
Refusing to learn is the only way to remain one.
@@Falanwe I believe OP was being facetious.
In fairness, I think this is very much a "nurture" thing. I was homeschooled Evangelical Protestant and used to be a hard-line creationist and didn't fully escape until I'd both converted to Catholicism (Catholic Church accepts evolution, while somehow ignoring/rejecting any spiritual implications because they're special like that 🙄) and spent years living away from my conservative family, and might not have at all if I hadn't been naturally curious and interested in science. The indoctrination is strong with these people.
4:00: What, Matt Powell was right for a full 15 seconds, that has to be a personal best for him.
*3:48
Matt Powell has an inflatable banana in his back yard he calls Dr. Peel, therefore his claims are false.
I have heard this elsewhere but I thought it was Dr. Peel. I could be mistaken.
@@antondovydaitis2261 Dr. Peel is definitely a doctor. Millions of people can't be wrong about that, many of whom don't have internet access by the way, but you can totally look for them and ask them.
@@antondovydaitis2261 I edited my comment because I respect truth.
@@bouldersoundguy I am gratified that you gave credence to my appeal.
Matt Powell had a large inflatable banana in his back yard and he calls it Dr. Peel.
I don't even watch just to see Powell being proven wrong as he always is, but to see if this comment happens without my help. Good job. Thank for the help.
So he is arguing that the all powerful Creator made us with planned obsolescence in Mind. Great guy. Maybe he didn't finish His classes in God-ing at school.
It's the whole "fall from paradise" Spiel they want to arrive at.
Who would thought that God was the inspiration of modern industry, He probably founded Apple Himself.
For how perfect and Illustrious they want to paint God as, they certainly make him sound like either a dick or completely incompetent when you look at the whole picture.
@@nicocchi They say He made flowers and bird song to inspire us. But He also made malaria and parasitoid wasps. Guy has a cruel sense of humor.
@@davidwood8730 Again, fall from paradise. Before we got kicked out of Eden, parasites and carnivores were all super nice and lovely. They literally claim T. rex was a herbivore in Eden.
I wonder if we're watching humanity enter an information-era dark age.
Is this a "great filter"? It feels like a great filter.
It certainly does.
That pfp of yours IS the great filter
@@nicocchi Goddamn right it is
I like how creationists talk about "GOOD" or "BAD" mutations, as if they were exams and someone came to give a note. They don't understand that the same mutation can decrease by 3% the activity of the proton pump but also lower by 8% the probability of a stroke, for exemple.
Epigenetics doesn't seem to be a word they ever read either.
But one thing that is true is that much lower natality rate, much lower infant mortality rate, and evidence-based medicine is hugely reducing selective pressure, and allow phenotypes (which is actualy the only aspect that matters when it comes to selection, not the genotype itself) to pass through, that would have been selected out in an harsher environment. But this different environment may also be allowing new beneficial traits to appear and be positively selected, so even there the concept of "BAD" mutation is moot. Ulitamely only the environment gets to pick which traits and phenotypes can stick around, and which don't. Human judgement doesn't apply.
Its alot to do with needing to remain pure. I wonder what Matt thinks someone who is 'pure' looks like and what they believe.
I find it weird how he states that natural selection DETECTS advantageous and deleterious mutations like evolution or natural selection is acting with agency; thereby assigning anthpromorphic qualities to a process that has no consciousness. That said I find a lot of people anthropomorphising allsorts of nonconscious processes because they find it easier to relate to them. But when you start getting into the more scientific parts of these things, it often hinder understanding rather than help it.
Creationists in particular do this, because they are unable to concieve of an effect without a concious being having caused it.
Well, even if it had consciousness, it doesn't have intent, lol. Our DNA actually IS deteriorating over time. It's thought to be a major cause of aging. I can't bring myself to watch this video, as I've had about all I can bear of willful ignorance as of late, but somehow I suspect that what I'm thinking of isn't QUITE what he has in mind.
Not only do you not need a being to cause something, but you don't even need a first cause. There is nothing illogical about there being an infinite causal chain. Ultimately, though, what they seem to miss is that the very essence of faith is belief without proof. Religious people who bothered to think throughout history have written a lot about this. I suppose Kierkegaard is just another victim of "cancel culture" ;) .It is the personal burden of the faithful to reconcile reality with their faith. That is how it is SUPPOSED to work. That is Job. That is Abraham and Isaac. I just can't anymore with these people, why don't they want good things?
But "detect" is not anthropomorphic. We aren't anthropomorphizing when we say a geiger counter detects radiation.
@@jursamaj but we have built the Geiger counter as a tool with a specific intent in mind. That is different from the process of evolution which has no intent. By using anthropomorphism to describe evolution, creationists can create a “boogeyman” that they can vilify and attack. Evolution does not “detect” anything,as that would imply a fixed purpose and the ability or cognition to distinguish between two states.
@@crhkrebs No, it implies no such thing. Single-celled organisms can detect light or food and move towards it. No cognition required. Hell, small bits of iron can detect a magnetic field, and align with it. Detecting is not an inherently cognitive activity.
Nor does detecting something imply any purpose.
And what "two states" do you think are relevant to evolution?
So we're going extinct?
Did God make an error? How can a perfect god create something that dies out? Guess that guy ain't that great, huh?
Imagine living on a planet where over 98% of all species have become extinct. Matt would be terrified.
Apparently Matt Powell is incapable of making a video without using those irritating quote fingers. If I ever met him I'd have no urge to debate creationism, but I'd have a hard time restraining myself from breaking his fingers two by two.
Ouch.
What you're missing from his argument is that he's making the (unfounded) assumption that "neutral" mutations are "deleterious" throughout the video. His logic seems to be something like "Mutations are when a mistake is entered into the genome, mistakes are bad, and the more mistakes you have the worse off you are, even if any one typo doesn't cause a major problem itself". Taking his analogy forward, his understanding seems to be that the human genome is a book, and that mutations are just random letters getting removed or replaced, and so even those "mutations" that don't prevent the book from being readable (it's easy enough to not even notice if "noise" becomes "nolse", for example), as the typos continue building it slowly goes from being flawed by readable to being complete gibberish.
It's obviously a completely BS argument, but I feel like this entire video you were addressing a different point than the one he was making. Rather than addressing the fundamental misunderstanding (IE, that "neutral" mutations are still bad somehow), you instead focused on just "Well yeah, you're just talking about neutral mutations, so what's the problem?"
Indeed that's what Powell is implying. Even though he says neutral mutation are neither beneficial nor deletirious he still considers them bad because they are copying _errors._ Errors are bad so neutral mutations must be bad in the long run is his thinking. Which is wrong of course.
No one expects a creationist that never read a biology book to understand evolution but here they are preaching with total confidence that PhDs are wrong and that creationists have a better understanding.
@@jtveg Exactly, which is my point that I wish Prof. Stick would have addressed that actual point in the video.
Aaaaaaaaand the original video is now private. VICTORY ACHIEVED!
You know mat Powell has a giant inflatable banana in his back garden he calls doctor peel ?....what's that you didn't know...well know you do, so pass it on....
Did you know that Dr. Peel suffers from Irritable Powell Syndrome?
@@vestafreyja
Sounds like he needs a session with Councillor Split
This is probably the earliest I've been to a video,
Me too
Me También
Yes?
@@strigonshitposting793 me too
The video title had to mean Matt Powell has opened his mouth again.
6:54 To be fair, he didn’t actually say the 100-200 mutations _are_ the 1-2% loss in genetic information.
Wouldn’t surprise me if he meant it that way, but he didn’t say that.
His video is private now. That's how proud of his work he is.
I recommend the channel Creation Myth for long form debunking of "genetic entropy"
Dang, if Matt’s right, then his god is one horrid designer if his perfect design is going extinct just by reproducing
@professor stick, I don't know if you are able to talk about your work but I think a lot of us would be interested in hearing more about real world science that you do.
Matt reveals profound knowledge of biology and genetics. He learned it all in Bible College of course. His 200 mutations were severely deleterious to his brain, especially to the honesty center. I feel sorry for his kids.
Aw, from the title of the clip I thought this was going to be about replicative fading in our self replicating DNA. Not genetic variation, diversity, and mutation.
Stick please keep making videos like this. These videos fit great into my 15 minute breaks at work
Well in the time it takes you to watch this video, babies are born that know more about evolution than he does.
Another interesting example of mutations is that there are mutations that are passed through generations that aren't harmful most of the time, unless both your parents have the mutation, in which case it is then harmful to you. Not an area I know much about, but something I amaware about due to having heard of people who happen to have conditions caused by a minor cell mutation that their parents both had, but hadn't been active until their generation (one I saw had siblings all being effected by the same condition, whilst both parents weren't because of it being inactive before they were born).
X'D You whispering at the paint drying was my favorite part, and I cannot tell you why.
Share your kinky secrets 😝
The smart one in the relationship between Matt Powell and his inflatable banana in the backyard, Dr Peel, is obviously Dr Peel.
OK Matt. You keep praying and I'll keep evolving.
My life is already deteriorating. I need no DNA to do the same.
I love fast talking rebuttal explaining videos where you can hardly keep up and where you hear "even though", "granted" and "that's actually not how it works" a lot in the video. Great video.
I would love a video that would arm us for our next encounter with a street YEC. You know, a run down of their common claims and arguments with quick responses that can shut them down, seeing as they love to interrupt explanations. 😄
I needed this today thanks Mr stick ^~^
Doctor Peel is whispering all these crazy things to him.
He's just jealous that his mutations are going extinct!
Great video. Thank you. Powell is such a fool, good to see someone calling him out.
Love it when stickman is sassy.
Don't you just love it when a person insults themselves simply by calling someone smarter than them stupid.
Holy shit, you still post!! I haven't watched a video of yours since 2017 and just randomly remembered you existed out of the blue today, and I'm very happy to see that you're still around!! Anyways, if you haven't already done one, it'd be neat if you made a video on that Gaia streaming service. It's been advertised a lot on UA-cam and apparently Demi Lovato is supporting it, and it's a platform promoting pseudoscience and conspiracy theories.
I particularly like the part where he says that vanishingly small mutations build up over time.
Whenever I feel overwhelmed by all the things I don't know, I watch Matt Powell and feel smart again.
That blank unintelligent stare would hunt my soul if I had one 🤣
Hey I think he presents some pretty compelling evidence for people mutating for worse over time. He's a pretty clear example, along with flat earthers and antivaxxers, that we're getting dumber as a whole.
We can thank modern medicine for this, evolution would have killed many of us, but scientists have kept us alive. I, for one, would be dead since I was born with asthma, and I'm a dumbass.
you may think that as a joke, but thats actually true. Smart people indeed get more stupid over generations while stupid people become slightly more smart and nobody knows for sure why.
+NEOC writes _"Hey I think he presents some pretty compelling evidence for people mutating for worse over time."_
Our development of society has stopped our species from undergoing natural selection -- if we hadn't developed society we'd just kill off people like Matt Powell and be done with it.
@@fred_derf I mean, I was just being mean to the dude, but you can actually make a case that detrimental genes can get passed off more easily because humans don't have to deal with the same challenges that other species do when facing natural selection, thanks to humans being (generally) very smart and capable of making technology to overcome those poor genes (which in a way it's still the same mechanism as natural selection I guess)
Got bad eyesight? Don't worry, there's not a predator waiting to ambush, you can get some glasses anyway.
(actually don't know if eyesight is genetic but you can find an analogous to get a more suitable example to what I'm trying to say)
@@nicocchi, writes _"Got bad eyesight? Don't worry, there's not a predator waiting to ambush, you can get some glasses anyway."_
And because of that bad eyesight will spread throughout our gene pool and affect a higher and higher percentage of people over time. At least until we develop gene therapies to "fix" people's eyesight during their embryonic development.
Man that paint drying was the best thing I have ever seen.
But I do end up watching the official Matt P due too UA-cam know what I want too watch.
Paint drying. Now I want to see Professor Stick do a video on that! :p
Dude, when you got to "the best part" of drying paint I actually did a spit take! Nicely delivered!
Oh, and Matt doesn't have the depth of knowledge or complexity of intellect to intentionally reword his arguments in a cunning way, so, yeah, he just confused himself with his own argument.
The drying paint bit was goddamn hilarious.
A flat earth video but instead of debunking them it's just 5:54 "Yes, I agree"
How can you identify dyslexia?
Their genes spell the alphabet as ATCG...
i like the mousetrap to tie clip argument. a mousetrap can lose a couple pieces and cease to be usable as a mousetrap, but retain enough pieces to make a perfectly functional tie clip.
Yes, but please remove the mouse first.
@@PabloSanchez-qu6ib
But the mouse is the best part of the trap!
@@stylesrj it gives juicy evolution points.
Watching the Mop Towell burn. Also, obligatory Dr. Peel reference.
Matt Power should do a colaboration with Dr. Peel.
The entropy of a system can go down in one location if it increases for the entire system.
Freezing ice for example decreases it's entropy becoming more organized. This is because the ice releases heat as it cools. This heat increases the entropy of the system even as the ice crystals organize.
DNA is so well preserved because the nucleotides release heat as they synthesize via phosphate reactions. This is why genetic entropy is bunk.
Plus there's a lot of mechanisms to keep it like that.
Sounds like Matt's been listening to Dr. Peel again.
EDIT: Matt Powel accusing someone of being 'scientifically illiterate' is possibly the most unintentionally hilarious thing I've ever heard.
Can we all give FireShard a very hearty round of applause for their constant financial support for Professor Stick throughout the years?
👏👏👏👏👏
👏👏👏
that start.
i can't help but feel as if he's trying super hard not to sound ableist as S368.
Well, certain deleterious mutations hang out in the genome many generations -- due to most of them being recessive.
This means that a very small number of individuals are impacted, thankfully. But it does mean a very large number of non-impacted carriers, keeping the "bad" gene going.
This is why the genome mapping project is important ---- we have the technology to find and eliminate such genes.
I heard a term today, the Fantasy Industrial Complex. Religion is certainly a main feature.
What boggles my mind is how creationists will site a scientific paper on a topic and then refute other scientific papers or even the findings of said original paper. Just ridiculous.
Matt: These mutations are neutral.
Also Matt: These mutations are deleterious.
Do you think Matt knows what "deleterious" means? Do you think his intended audience does?
I doubt that his target audience even knows what 99% of the words he said mean.
I swear some people will read a hundred misleading articles instead of the one or two actually informative ones...
Yooooo I’m working on a PhD in bioinformatics myself right now!
They made it... A creationist was right for more than 0.1 seconds!!
Clearly a mutated species...
This guy is a regular Zapp Brannigan. "What makes a man go Neutral Kiff?"
You can here it to professor stick aswell ,and thought it was only me that could here it .....
When i first saw the title i thought it was gonna be about telomeres, and dna actually deteriorating
🍌 I keep expecting Powell to do a daffy duck impression with his lisp 😄🍌
I love how he mentions neutral mutations, equivocate them to typographical errors, and say that our genetics must be deteriorating.
Why mention them to be neutral anyways? This should already show how dishonest his conclusion is, because it should already be clear that those specific mutations aren't doing anything.
Also, mutations are only analogous to typographical errors in that they are only changes to the code. It is more accurate to say that mutations are simply genetic changes, and they vary between good, neutral and bad.
And since most of them are neutral, then it is more accurate to say that most mutations don't do anything. That's it.
I know, right? If the "neutral" mutations would eventually cause extinction, they wouldn't be neutral. At what point would we have accumulated "too many" mutations? How, exactly, would that cause the entire population to die out at once?
@@reformCopyright I don't even get how neutral mutations could accumulate. Well, it's more like saying they could add up, but it just equals nothing by the end of the day.
Ah man, you make me smile!
And who thinks that we only get 1 mutation at a time? Yes, that's right Creationists and no one else..
Matt Powell has a mutants banana in his, Hovind's, backyard called yellow Xavier!
*Presses pause*
This is the one where he does the bait and switch between neutral mutations and errors, isn't it?
*Presses play*
Yeah, thought so.
Matt is impossible to underestimate
I think his first mistakes was assuming mutations are "errors". As if all mutations are bad.
936,000,000,000 beneficial mutations in the whole history of humanity for anyone curious
Matt Powell makes my DNA deteriorate just by talking.
Upload a video where you compare a 3 h live stream of drying paint to the Lens-flare-lady or something. It can be 5min summary of the paint and one minute saying "Lens flares are not caused by aliens" and laughing.
Matt has a coupon for his paper cred.
"Typographical errors"? This guy seriously think the letters we have assigned to DNA to represent adenine, cytosine, guanine and thymine is text? You could, kinda, think mutations are "typographical errors" but Matt is representing it as if they would be actual typographical errors. Does Matt also think the Schrödinger's cat thought experiment is actually about a cat in a box?
You might want to require that he have a PhD from a *reputable* source, before he whips out his degree from "Jesus Loves Us Christian Creationism College" XD
William Dembski is currently teaching advanced Christological Jesusology at the Jesusological Institute of Advanced Christology.
these people are fucking frightening.
Matt Powell is what you get when Frank Turek breeds with a potato, and is then allowed to feast on paint chips as a child
I would not mind watching a video of Stick watching paint dry, and explaining all the physics and chemistry that goes on in paint drying.
For those that don't know, Matt Powell has a giant inflatable banana in his back yard, which he calls "Dr Peel".
Once again I say stupid people will ALWAYS find a way to ignore facts that make them uncomfortable and thus remain comfortably stupid.
0:25 Also the reason why I don't watch any life streams. Or any recording of them.
You could title *every* response to a Matt Powell video "Matt Powell is wrong" and the title would be factually accurate.
He made the original video private... Couldn't handle the stick squad!
I think I see his problem. He's viewing evolution as some sort of "prime mover" like his God rather than an emergent property of chance vs environment.
Matt makes my brain melt. Just tape his mouth shut so he doesn't spew nonsense anymore.
Deleterious mutations, like continually not diversifying your family tree?
I would watch a 3 hour live stream with Stick just watching paint dry.
That should kindle research to find the deletarious mutations responsible for creationism.
I think what confused him is that he seems to be trying to claim that neutral mutations must amount to ‘ruined’ or ‘corrupted’ DNA that can no longer function as part of the human genome
I thank you for this truly! I was debating some folks about evolution (an atheist evolution denier, if you can believe that) on a creationist video, and he hit me with "genetic entropy" and I. Did. Not. Know. What. To. Do. Never heard the term before, didn't know enough to debunk or even logically argue against it, and I HATE losing debates with people like this due to my own ignorance. I used every tactic in the book to try and get away from this subject, but he knew I didn't know and he knew he had me. It's always stuck in my craw losing that one, and the scientific papers I found on the subject were D E N S E and not written for layman's at all and unless I was just gonna copy and paste the articles, that wasn't gonna help. Plus I knew he would recognize the text and just decided to concede the point.
But did you know that Matt has a giant inflatable banana in his back yard that he calls, Dr Peel?