It's a fundamental bastardization of the scene, it didn't need words. Alternating his gaze between the emperor and his son screaming on the floor tells the whole story.
@@TheLordNovo It never ceases to amaze me how people who have no idea what they're talking about always feel compelled to comment still. This is false hence the video. They wanted to get a real OT fan's reaction to the change. The 'no' dialogue was added to the special editions which completely undermines the suspense as you're made aware of what Vader's choice is once he says no. As opposed to the suspense being due to the fact that he originally said nothing as his gaze switched between his son and Palpatine until he made his final decision through the act of killing the Emperor. You originally didn't know his choice until he made it at the last moment. That more prolonged tension of not knowing created a much more emotional build that's been cropped and compromised in the special editions.
When I heard it ...my heart sank...I actually got disillusioned and kind of mad,..it's CINEMA NOT THEATER ...he doesn't have to say ANYTHING it's all there with the actions and the framing and the editing and music,..com'on George !
I didn't even know this change was made until this video. What...the...fuck?! How many god damn times is Lucas going to tamper with the original films?
Christian Martinez In the original scene which you can see on the 2004 DVDs which will still have changes in other parts of the films, the scene happens as we see in this video except Vader doesn't say anything trust me look it up it's better that way.
This was great. There should be more instant reactions like this online. Many, many, many people are going to have a fit when they see the blu ray edit. A lot of money to spend on a box of shit.
At some point I just have to question why. Either Lucas thinks his audience is so stupid that they couldn't understand why Vader tossed the Emperor over that railing, or he's just trolling people. I sincerely hope it's the latter, because at least that speaks of some level of awareness that he's tainting something people love. I'm just inclined to think A New Hope was a complete fluke. That he somehow fell ass backwards into telling a compelling sci-fi samurai story and he's never understood why people like that movie and the sequels. And he didn't lose his mind after Return of the Jedi, lest we forget he made the Star Wars Holiday Special immediately after A New Hope. I don't think the dude ever had it. After the past couple weeks, I'm absolutely happy these are now out of his reach. He can't do damage anymore, be it purposeful or through his own ignorance. The franchise is in the hands of better caretakers, as Lucas is an abusive one. He equated his selling Star Wars to Disney as selling his children to white slavers, but it's stuff like this that makes me think the better analogy is he willingly surrendered his children to child protective services.
"Either Lucas thinks his audience is so stupid that they couldn't understand why Vader tossed the Emperor over that railing" Well, the audience _IS_ stupid, that's a fact. They need everything to be spelled out for them or they simply won't understand. Totally incapable of reading between the lines and of coming to the right conclusion by themselves. It's sad, but true. "Who erased Kamino from the archives??", "the new dialogue between Vader and Palpatine in TESB makes absolutely no sense!!", "how can Leia remember her real mother?", "why does Anakin's Force ghost look young while Yoda and Obi-Wan are still old?" All the answers to those questions can be found in the movies if you pay attention, but nooooo, it's still way too complex for some to understand without being spoonfed, apparently. BTW, Disney has done *more* damage to the whole saga with just one movie than Lucas ever did with the Special Editions and the prequel movies combined.
@@Megrez-Alberich Most of these things are given 'answers' by George in the same way Siri has 'answers' to the meaning of life; they might be sound logically, but are either superficial and/or make the lore/story/characterisation mediocre. Case in point: Anakin’s ghost being the young Anakin. One can rationalise the Hayden insertion at the end of Jedi by saying the Force shows one at the zenith of their heroism/goodness/humanity, which makes some sense. In any case, the implication is that for the duration of his time as Vader, which includes his redemption in saving Luke, he wasn’t his true self, and that his horrifically evil acts and beliefs as a younger Anakin were cosher enough that his knightly self is who appears. They're extremely ill-defined if you think about the rules of the Force for more than a minute, but deeper than that, on a psychological level, it’s worse because it questions the dying Vader’s agency and the legitimacy of all the life experiences he accrued whilst being Vader, including those with Luke. That there was life-defining good/humanity still deep within him, even at the end, is logically contradicted. Most of George's ‘improvements’ are just superficial, dumb &/or silly, and at worst insulting, but I find this is a microcosm of many of them in how fundamentally vitiating they are.
Didn’t know nothing about this until now !! And OMG 😮 George what did you do,????if the “NOOOOO” In ROTS is not bad enuff u completely fucked him right over !! This scene was perfect the way it was 💔
Actions speak louder then words and the scene where Vader lifts Palpetine over his head and throwing him into the abyss to save his son is a perfect example. There was no need for adding the No's in there. Maybe, and just maybe, Lucas could have gotten away with the first one Vader said normally, but the second one of him screaming it was totally uncalled for.
its one stinking line.. he didnt rape anything.. it didnt change the plot, or the out come, or anything.. what is the flipping deal.. i'm a huge Star wars fan... and i'm not crying about it
Wow I can't believe they made that change. And I don't understand why Lucas wouldn't release the original trilogy in it's original condition assuming what he said about never releasing it is true.
Not really. The only versions available on DVD are the "special editions". One of the releases features the originals as a special feature but Lucas purposely didn't format them to play correctly on modern televisions.
If you think it is more dramatic to shot the viewer the NOOOO than to show the scene without any voice overs, showing the inner turmoil Vader presents, then you haven't understood anything from Star Wars.
I think George Lucas makes have of these edits not just to antagonize himself circa 1988 when he called people who tinkered with old films "barbarians" in front of congress but to antagonize apparently loyal fans... (seriously, do a web search - Lucas did indeed say that in 1988, to congress... because "people who alter or destroy works of art and our cultural heritage for profit"... his own words, folks... and like the 1978 holiday special, his own comments cannot be excised...)
That's not entirely correct. They look like a postage stamp on modern TV's because Lucasfilm just ported the laserdisc releases from 1995, so they were formated for that common TV screen at the time, to save money. The original unaltered trilogy has never been digitally scanned by itself or restored and that takes time and money which at the time Lucasfilm didnt want to spend the time or money for a for such a project. So the cheaper way of a laserdisc port was used
You know what? I'd be perfectly fine if Lucas had made an honest mistake in the prequel trilogy, while it never was objectively good it still got better as it went along, It looked like Lucas was taking criticism on board, albeit not enough. But this is a colossal fuck you to everyone who didn't like the line in RoTS and he obviously wants to rub it in our faces.
@GeneralMontague yep, Lucas took one of the most infamous lines and *overdubbed it* onto the original trilogy. I can just imagine his little girly laugh as he did it...
George Lucas and Star Wars is kinda like a marriage. When they first married we thought they were the perfect couple. Then as the years went by, we started to notice she had bruises on her arm. Then a black eye or two. Now George just slaps her around in public and forces her to get ugly tattoos and piercings, all the while he's smiling at us, knowing we can't do anything to save her.
Hayden as Luke Hayden as Vader CGI as all spaceships, creatures and droids(including JJB) TM as Boba Fett Natalie Portman as Leia all scenes redone with CGI!!
There is a big difference between adding scenes and altering scenes. Also, directors cuts are different than teatrical cuts. Lucas modified the movies and never released the originals. Thats like releasing a directors cut without releasing the theatrcal cut and yes, in that cas eits bad. thats why usually a studio only releases a directors cut on DVD if the movie was awful and did not win much at the box office (example: green lantern). Remastering has already been forbidden. :)
I grew up with the Special Editions of the trilogy, so I don't usually mind when Lucas makes changes to the films (however some get under my skin such as Greedo shooting first, Hayden Christensen in ROTJ, and the song in Jabba's palace). But this change is absolutely terrible! What was George Lucas thinking?!?!?!?!?!
when i first saw this clip online when they BDs were just out I was convinced it was a pisstake fan edit. Its fucking shocking and worse than anything else added to the movies, the greedo stuff dont bother me at all other than how fucking shit it looks now. Adding this nooooooo ruins what all 6 films were building up to. If they had to add something to this perhaps Qui Gon shouting "anakin" during one of the shots of vaders head when hes thinking. (the same shout from the scene in Attack of the clones in the vision Yoda has just as Anakin hacked up the sandpeople)
@GeneralMontague There's a theory that he's just deliberately fucking with the fans at this point.... or he's actually insane and has no idea how to treat the Star Wars franchise..
You should see how Hitler reacted to the Star Wars Blu Ray changes. Type: "Hitler Learns About the Star Wars Blu Ray Changes" in the search field. Priceless!
Vader is a wrestler, the character in Star Wars is DARTH Vader. But my point is there is nothing wrong with George Lucas doing what he wants with his films, it's his vision not yours or mine.
I've NEVER been more grateful to own all THREE of the original films in letterbox on DVD...UNSCREWED with, as seen in theaters way back when...anyone who wants copies to help me keep them circulating, drop me a line via my channel, I will GLADLY ship them to you FREE if you promise to pass them around...KEEP THE ORIGINALS ALIVE!!!...;)
@colmustard42 I applaud you, colmustard, for having the guts to say you're sorry. You are a rare breed that all youtube commenters should aspire to be.
@Carvemasta If you had to take TWO shuttles to Endor every day for work, you would feel exactly like the majority of us do. Do some research before commenting, please.
"Vader was seduced by the dark side of the Force". Good luck telling Obi Wan that he should say "Darth Vader" jsut because you heard of a wrestler named Vader. Lucas destroys the movies with his "vision".
Thankfully George Lucas does not even acknowledge the existence of the Novels, so hopefully we don't have to worry about him trying to "improve" the Thrawn Trilogy... *shudders at the thought*
@CornyTelecaster49 Wrong. *TRUE* fans dare to give criticism over extremely stupid and degrading things. This isn't just degrading, it's insulting. It is as if Lucas himself flew over the world, took a cab, rode to my house, rang the doorbell and slapped me in the face as I opened the door. This was unnecessary, without adding any character and instead ruined the suspense of the scene. "NOOOOOO!" was bad enough in episode 3, ruining practically the entire movie. This is no better.
@TheOjibway84 Maybe if you opened up your eyes a little, and if you stopped thinking at a preschool level... You would realize it was a splinter troll.
When a movie is released, its not the creators anymore. It's the publics. Any GOOD filmmaker will tell you this. That doesn't involve Lucas, his prequels were some of the worst movies ever to greet the big screen.
It's worse than it merely sounding pathetic. Silent heroism is always understood as more impactful, so the reverse has the opposite effect. Basic filmmaking.
When talking to a kid like you it is because you'll never accept that Star Wars belongs to George Lucas and he is allowed to do ANYTHING he wants with it. Want the "original" versions? track down the VHS copies.
On an emotion level i think this works very well, everything the emperor promised Anakin right after he turned to the Dark side comes full circle and Anakin finally realizes this that he can't do what he promised him and he lets go of his anger to save his son.
It makes him sound weak and pathetic, like when Luke discovers Vader's his father. Even Luke was capable of staying silent (if you don't include the infamous but later removed ADR in the SE) when he fell heroically. Fundamentally, though, in any text it's understood that silent heroism = more impactful heroism.
We should all thank George Lucas for creating the most awesome saga of all time! But noooo all you geeks do is talk shit about him and complain about the prequels and jar jar binks and how he "ruined your childhood" ! you probably dont even pay attention to the story! I mean So what if he made some better animation and CGI changes?! Those are his movies (btw greatest of all times) and he can do what ever he wants with them! TRUE FANS LOVE STAR WARS JUST THE WAY IT IS!!
@cromwellian13 It'll be just like Russia vs. Germany in WWII. Two common individuals fighting eachother (In Russia and Germany's case, it's dictatorship vs. dictatorship).
I'm not buying this trilogy on blu-ray. I'll stick to my DVDs. Even better I might just keep my 1997 special editions on DVD copied from blu-ray and sell off the 2004 versions....
i cancelled my blu ray box today i dont need this fouth or fifth whatever changed edition i have the original version with no changes on dvd im not gonna pay lucas any more money for fucking up my favorite movies
Not to get off-track, but before there's more criticism from the fans on George Lucas cutting up Star Wars, listen to what Bill Shatner says when he compares it to Star Trek (look up Star Trek v Star Wars on You Tube and you'll see...)! Brace yourselves; this is coming from someone who nearly killed the franchise with "Star Trek V"!!!
@CuteYetiTv If I have the DVD this would then force a place like Best Buy to not sell me the blu-ray. You're right. I'm very stupid for not thinking of that.
sorry to ask but is this the actual legitimate blue ray dvd of return of the Jedi you guys are watching or have you guys thrown that no in there yourself
@salemarde What's more pathetic? Being passionate about something you love or making a troll-ish, grammatically incorrect comment on youtube on a Saturday afternoon?
It's a fundamental bastardization of the scene, it didn't need words. Alternating his gaze between the emperor and his son screaming on the floor tells the whole story.
Revenant Gaming no it didnt
@@TheLordNovo No it fucking didnt.
@@TheLordNovo It never ceases to amaze me how people who have no idea what they're talking about always feel compelled to comment still.
This is false hence the video. They wanted to get a real OT fan's reaction to the change.
The 'no' dialogue was added to the special editions which completely undermines the suspense as you're made aware of what Vader's choice is once he says no.
As opposed to the suspense being due to the fact that he originally said nothing as his gaze switched between his son and Palpatine until he made his final decision through the act of killing the Emperor. You originally didn't know his choice until he made it at the last moment.
That more prolonged tension of not knowing created a much more emotional build that's been cropped and compromised in the special editions.
When I heard it ...my heart sank...I actually got disillusioned and kind of mad,..it's CINEMA NOT THEATER ...he doesn't have to say ANYTHING it's all there with the actions and the framing and the editing and music,..com'on George !
I didn't even know this change was made until this video. What...the...fuck?! How many god damn times is Lucas going to tamper with the original films?
I KNOW! I didn’t know either!
+SummerWave Don't worry. Disney won't allow it anymore.
Can you guys explain the whole situation I'm seeing everyone talk about in these comments? What happens in the original?
Christian Martinez In the original scene which you can see on the 2004 DVDs which will still have changes in other parts of the films, the scene happens as we see in this video except Vader doesn't say anything trust me look it up it's better that way.
Garry O'Toole That's how I remember it but seeing this video made me think it's always been like this ha
i feel like this demasculates Vader
Dear George...You broke my heart.
This was great. There should be more instant reactions like this online. Many, many, many people are going to have a fit when they see the blu ray edit. A lot of money to spend on a box of shit.
At some point I just have to question why. Either Lucas thinks his audience is so stupid that they couldn't understand why Vader tossed the Emperor over that railing, or he's just trolling people. I sincerely hope it's the latter, because at least that speaks of some level of awareness that he's tainting something people love.
I'm just inclined to think A New Hope was a complete fluke. That he somehow fell ass backwards into telling a compelling sci-fi samurai story and he's never understood why people like that movie and the sequels. And he didn't lose his mind after Return of the Jedi, lest we forget he made the Star Wars Holiday Special immediately after A New Hope. I don't think the dude ever had it.
After the past couple weeks, I'm absolutely happy these are now out of his reach. He can't do damage anymore, be it purposeful or through his own ignorance. The franchise is in the hands of better caretakers, as Lucas is an abusive one. He equated his selling Star Wars to Disney as selling his children to white slavers, but it's stuff like this that makes me think the better analogy is he willingly surrendered his children to child protective services.
Lucas didn't make the Holiday Special.
How do you feel about Disney now?
I face palmed so damn hard that I’m fairly certain myself from 4 years ago felt it...
"Either Lucas thinks his audience is so stupid that they couldn't understand why Vader tossed the Emperor over that railing"
Well, the audience _IS_ stupid, that's a fact. They need everything to be spelled out for them or they simply won't understand. Totally incapable of reading between the lines and of coming to the right conclusion by themselves.
It's sad, but true. "Who erased Kamino from the archives??", "the new dialogue between Vader and Palpatine in TESB makes absolutely no sense!!", "how can Leia remember her real mother?", "why does Anakin's Force ghost look young while Yoda and Obi-Wan are still old?"
All the answers to those questions can be found in the movies if you pay attention, but nooooo, it's still way too complex for some to understand without being spoonfed, apparently.
BTW, Disney has done *more* damage to the whole saga with just one movie than Lucas ever did with the Special Editions and the prequel movies combined.
@@rjd-kh8et He allowed it to be made.
@@Megrez-Alberich Most of these things are given 'answers' by George in the same way Siri has 'answers' to the meaning of life; they might be sound logically, but are either superficial and/or make the lore/story/characterisation mediocre. Case in point: Anakin’s ghost being the young Anakin.
One can rationalise the Hayden insertion at the end of Jedi by saying the Force shows one at the zenith of their heroism/goodness/humanity, which makes some sense. In any case, the implication is that for the duration of his time as Vader, which includes his redemption in saving Luke, he wasn’t his true self, and that his horrifically evil acts and beliefs as a younger Anakin were cosher enough that his knightly self is who appears. They're extremely ill-defined if you think about the rules of the Force for more than a minute, but deeper than that, on a psychological level, it’s worse because it questions the dying Vader’s agency and the legitimacy of all the life experiences he accrued whilst being Vader, including those with Luke. That there was life-defining good/humanity still deep within him, even at the end, is logically contradicted.
Most of George's ‘improvements’ are just superficial, dumb &/or silly, and at worst insulting, but I find this is a microcosm of many of them in how fundamentally vitiating they are.
Didn’t know nothing about this until now !! And OMG 😮 George what did you do,????if the “NOOOOO” In ROTS is not bad enuff u completely fucked him right over !! This scene was perfect the way it was 💔
0:25 my reaction exactly.
I don't understand all the hatred, I dont mind it and kinda like it actually.
0.26 The guy in the chair absorbs the darkside
"ROTJ NOO!" reaction videos are slowly taking the place of "2 girls 1 cup" reaction videos
The issue is that Lucas will not release the originals in a modern day format (e.g. Blu Ray) and says that he never plans to.
Actions speak louder then words and the scene where Vader lifts Palpetine over his head and throwing him into the abyss to save his son is a perfect example. There was no need for adding the No's in there. Maybe, and just maybe, Lucas could have gotten away with the first one Vader said normally, but the second one of him screaming it was totally uncalled for.
its one stinking line.. he didnt rape anything.. it didnt change the plot, or the out come, or anything.. what is the flipping deal.. i'm a huge Star wars fan... and i'm not crying about it
Wow I can't believe they made that change. And I don't understand why Lucas wouldn't release the original trilogy in it's original condition assuming what he said about never releasing it is true.
@GerardWayJr Those 2 itty bitty words changed the impact of an entire scene.
Not really. The only versions available on DVD are the "special editions". One of the releases features the originals as a special feature but Lucas purposely didn't format them to play correctly on modern televisions.
@St0yl3s Wow. You must REALLY mean that! THANK YOU FOR POSTING!!!
VADER "NO!"
FAN "GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE!"
VADER "NNNNNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOO!"
If you think it is more dramatic to shot the viewer the NOOOO than to show the scene without any voice overs, showing the inner turmoil Vader presents, then you haven't understood anything from Star Wars.
@Carvemasta I agree with you. Some of the fans are just SO melodramatic, half of the time, I'm even embarrassed to share the same fandom as them. >:(
The second Nooooooooo. Is so unfuckingnecessary.
I think George Lucas makes have of these edits not just to antagonize himself circa 1988 when he called people who tinkered with old films "barbarians" in front of congress but to antagonize apparently loyal fans... (seriously, do a web search - Lucas did indeed say that in 1988, to congress... because "people who alter or destroy works of art and our cultural heritage for profit"... his own words, folks... and like the 1978 holiday special, his own comments cannot be excised...)
That's not entirely correct. They look like a postage stamp on modern TV's because Lucasfilm just ported the laserdisc releases from 1995, so they were formated for that common TV screen at the time, to save money. The original unaltered trilogy has never been digitally scanned by itself or restored and that takes time and money which at the time Lucasfilm didnt want to spend the time or money for a for such a project. So the cheaper way of a laserdisc port was used
the first no can go out... the second one might stay
the original UNALTERED version of the trilogy is on dvd.
You know what?
I'd be perfectly fine if Lucas had made an honest mistake in the prequel trilogy, while it never was objectively good it still got better as it went along, It looked like Lucas was taking criticism on board, albeit not enough.
But this is a colossal fuck you to everyone who didn't like the line in RoTS and he obviously wants to rub it in our faces.
@GeneralMontague yep, Lucas took one of the most infamous lines and *overdubbed it* onto the original trilogy. I can just imagine his little girly laugh as he did it...
@tripweed Very well put!
George Lucas and Star Wars is kinda like a marriage. When they first married we thought they were the perfect couple. Then as the years went by, we started to notice she had bruises on her arm. Then a black eye or two. Now George just slaps her around in public and forces her to get ugly tattoos and piercings, all the while he's smiling at us, knowing we can't do anything to save her.
@GerardWayJr Perhaps if he only did "itty bitty" changes we WOULDN'T make such a big deal out of it.
Good old DVD, good old DVD...
ok people really i dont mind some of the blu ray changes this ones the biggest in my opioin but i still dont mind it
Its better with the no
Hayden as Luke
Hayden as Vader
CGI as all spaceships, creatures and droids(including JJB)
TM as Boba Fett
Natalie Portman as Leia
all scenes redone with CGI!!
Eh, I don't mind it.
I can only bear to watch a reaction video but that still hurt.
There is a big difference between adding scenes and altering scenes. Also, directors cuts are different than teatrical cuts. Lucas modified the movies and never released the originals. Thats like releasing a directors cut without releasing the theatrcal cut and yes, in that cas eits bad. thats why usually a studio only releases a directors cut on DVD if the movie was awful and did not win much at the box office (example: green lantern). Remastering has already been forbidden. :)
I grew up with the Special Editions of the trilogy, so I don't usually mind when Lucas makes changes to the films (however some get under my skin such as Greedo shooting first, Hayden Christensen in ROTJ, and the song in Jabba's palace). But this change is absolutely terrible! What was George Lucas thinking?!?!?!?!?!
they did the same exact thing to aliens 3 by changing the last scene,and it turned out to be fucking stupid!
when i first saw this clip online when they BDs were just out I was convinced it was a pisstake fan edit. Its fucking shocking and worse than anything else added to the movies, the greedo stuff dont bother me at all other than how fucking shit it looks now. Adding this nooooooo ruins what all 6 films were building up to. If they had to add something to this perhaps Qui Gon shouting "anakin" during one of the shots of vaders head when hes thinking. (the same shout from the scene in Attack of the clones in the vision Yoda has just as Anakin hacked up the sandpeople)
@GeneralMontague There's a theory that he's just deliberately fucking with the fans at this point.... or he's actually insane and has no idea how to treat the Star Wars franchise..
You should see how Hitler reacted to the Star Wars Blu Ray changes. Type: "Hitler Learns About the Star Wars Blu Ray Changes" in the search field. Priceless!
@GerardWayJr This was recorded at work.
well it's on Ebay and Amazon and such. I think it would be cool to have but I would still prefer the original tapes.
Why hasn't there been a youtube video of all the NO's from Star Wars? Is there one?
Vader is a wrestler, the character in Star Wars is DARTH Vader. But my point is there is nothing wrong with George Lucas doing what he wants with his films, it's his vision not yours or mine.
Ugh goddamn. Another reason I didn't fall for that "oh boy it's on blu ray now" BS
It's so funny to see stuff like this, having just watched 'The People vs George Lucas', which was made pre-Blu Rays.....it continues!
I've NEVER been more grateful to own all THREE of the original films in letterbox on DVD...UNSCREWED with, as seen in theaters way back when...anyone who wants copies to help me keep them circulating, drop me a line via my channel, I will GLADLY ship them to you FREE if you promise to pass them around...KEEP THE ORIGINALS ALIVE!!!...;)
Yes but it is now 1) out of print 2) Purposely not made for modern day televisions. It's presented for the old 4:3 style and not 16:9.
so that was not Palpatine scream?
@colmustard42 I applaud you, colmustard, for having the guts to say you're sorry. You are a rare breed that all youtube commenters should aspire to be.
@RYjazzmetal17 From what I've seen, you can only get the 2004 DVD's that have the non-anamorphic laserdisc transfers used.
@Carvemasta If you had to take TWO shuttles to Endor every day for work, you would feel exactly like the majority of us do. Do some research before commenting, please.
Am I the only Star Wars fan who has never been bothered by any additions to the movies?
Meanwhile, in Skywalker Ranch.....
"Vader was seduced by the dark side of the Force". Good luck telling Obi Wan that he should say "Darth Vader" jsut because you heard of a wrestler named Vader. Lucas destroys the movies with his "vision".
Is that the best you can do when you've been confronted with arguments ?
Thankfully George Lucas does not even acknowledge the existence of the Novels, so hopefully we don't have to worry about him trying to "improve" the Thrawn Trilogy... *shudders at the thought*
Did he add Vader saying "No..."? Damn it! I refused to see the new versions because I knew shit like this was going to happen.
He might. I personally don't mind them, however, they do spoil quite a lot of things to do with the robots.
...maybe if lucASS had a few "No Man" around crap like this wouldnt happen...
@CornyTelecaster49 Wrong. *TRUE* fans dare to give criticism over extremely stupid and degrading things. This isn't just degrading, it's insulting. It is as if Lucas himself flew over the world, took a cab, rode to my house, rang the doorbell and slapped me in the face as I opened the door.
This was unnecessary, without adding any character and instead ruined the suspense of the scene. "NOOOOOO!" was bad enough in episode 3, ruining practically the entire movie. This is no better.
The first noo i think fit his character, but the second is terrile an makes you think of that terrible noo at the end of episode iii
@TheOjibway84 Maybe if you opened up your eyes a little, and if you stopped thinking at a preschool level... You would realize it was a splinter troll.
This was nothing compared to Reeeeeeey!!! In the sequel films.
@cromwellian13 It means you should stick with a DVD. Then you couldn't buy the star wars complete Blu-Ray collection
I actually like that part
At last a normal person.
When a movie is released, its not the creators anymore. It's the publics. Any GOOD filmmaker will tell you this. That doesn't involve Lucas, his prequels were some of the worst movies ever to greet the big screen.
I thought that was Palpatine screaming.......?
@Sarnius26 Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you the Captain of the 2011 UA-cam Debate Team.
It's worse than it merely sounding pathetic.
Silent heroism is always understood as more impactful, so the reverse has the opposite effect. Basic filmmaking.
NOOOO!!!
@Carvemasta I'm surprised you had the time to write this. Don't you have more lunch money to steal?
When talking to a kid like you it is because you'll never accept that Star Wars belongs to George Lucas and he is allowed to do ANYTHING he wants with it. Want the "original" versions? track down the VHS copies.
Yes.
@Adventurer07 If you're going to degrade, use a joke that isn't older than your last adventure into society.
On an emotion level i think this works very well, everything the emperor promised Anakin right after he turned to the Dark side comes full circle and Anakin finally realizes this that he can't do what he promised him and he lets go of his anger to save his son.
John Moran But that's literally what's sprinkled into the entire film, you don't need him saying no to show that, that's just dumb
It makes him sound weak and pathetic, like when Luke discovers Vader's his father. Even Luke was capable of staying silent (if you don't include the infamous but later removed ADR in the SE) when he fell heroically. Fundamentally, though, in any text it's understood that silent heroism = more impactful heroism.
George Lucas is the man!!! I like it
@drachakrabarti Anyone who comments, "Get a life", on a youtube video thread needs to look inward.
We should all thank George Lucas for creating the most awesome saga of all time! But noooo all you geeks do is talk shit about him and complain about the prequels and jar jar binks and how he "ruined your childhood" ! you probably dont even pay attention to the story! I mean So what if he made some better animation and CGI changes?! Those are his movies (btw greatest of all times) and he can do what ever he wants with them! TRUE FANS LOVE STAR WARS JUST THE WAY IT IS!!
@cromwellian13 It'll be just like Russia vs. Germany in WWII. Two common individuals fighting eachother (In Russia and Germany's case, it's dictatorship vs. dictatorship).
Should have called them Star Wars: The Idiot Tax Edition. Stop giving George Lucas money.
I'm not buying this trilogy on blu-ray. I'll stick to my DVDs. Even better I might just keep my 1997 special editions on DVD copied from blu-ray and sell off the 2004 versions....
i feel like lucas just does random stupid shit like this to piss off the fans, for all the hate he gets. next thing heel do is make chewie cgi
@darthvalor07 Everyone should try reading the above post while picturing the reader's face as the emoticon he/she used here. It's quite funny!
Who gives a shit. It's Star Wars, I love it.
You are not.
i cancelled my blu ray box today i dont need this fouth or fifth whatever changed edition i have the original version with no changes on dvd im not gonna pay lucas any more money for fucking up my favorite movies
Google is your friend! :)
Not to get off-track, but before there's more criticism from the fans on George Lucas cutting up Star Wars, listen to what Bill Shatner says when he compares it to Star Trek (look up Star Trek v Star Wars on You Tube and you'll see...)! Brace yourselves; this is coming from someone who nearly killed the franchise with "Star Trek V"!!!
@CuteYetiTv If I have the DVD this would then force a place like Best Buy to not sell me the blu-ray. You're right. I'm very stupid for not thinking of that.
@colmustard42 Calm down, colmustard. We're all friends here. Some people just have to realize it.
@GerardWayJr Passionate. Lucas would be the obsessive one.
sorry to ask but is this the actual legitimate blue ray dvd of return of the Jedi you guys are watching or have you guys thrown that no in there yourself
@salemarde What's more pathetic? Being passionate about something you love or making a troll-ish, grammatically incorrect comment on youtube on a Saturday afternoon?
@Trekiefreak777 No need for nerd on nerd hate.