.357 mag vs .44 mag - Drywall Test
Вставка
- Опубліковано 4 чер 2024
- Please Subscribe to the channel HERE: bit.ly/2xQ9ap2
Add me on facebook: / whoteewho
Add me on Instagram: / mrwho_tee_who_
Truly appreciate you watching the videos!!!
New Merch available - bit.ly/2W68Gqp
Heavy Metal here: bit.ly/30wF6wW
Support us on Patreon / whoteewho
.357 mag vs .44 mag - Drywall Test
bulletproof drywall,bullet proof drywall,shooting drywall,shoot drywall,how many walls of drywall stop a bullet,drywall stop a bullet,will drywall stop a bullet,gun vs drywall,glock vs drywall,revolver vs drywall,357 drywall,357 magnum vs drywall,44 magnum vs drywall,.357 vs .44,.357 magnum vs .44 magnum,.357 magnum vs .45 acp,.44 magnum vs .357 magnum,357 magnum vs 44 magnum,357 mag vs 44 mag,44 mag vs 357 mag,whoteewho,how much drywall stops a bullet - Розваги
I bet if the .44 mag had the extra 2 inches of barrel that the .357 had, it would have gone through more sheets than it did. I always try to keep barrel length the same when comparing two rounds.
Speed and diameter...
@@philippewhitty3049 what do you mean by that?
@@joejose2022 The smaller diameter and the speed, that important for penetration.
@@philippewhitty3049 the original commenter was saying that you lose velocity with shorter barrels. The difference between a 2 in barrel and a 4 in barrel would be significant. If the 44 mag was a 4 in barrel it would have a greater velocity and better penetration.
Paul Harrell has disproved the barrel length notion several times with many makes of revolvers.
Anybody who doesn't like 357 and 44 magnum just ain't American
Facts
‘Murica!
And 45 acp
Accurate.
@@xx_insert_cool_username_he6876 lol 2 world wars!
This is insane. I thought maybe 7 or 8 for the .357 and about 10 for the .44...This is a great video especially for people out there who want a concealed carry permit and think - "No, I need something with real stopping a 357 isn't enough, I need a 44.". It's true that the 44 does do more damage but the 357 will go through practically anything the 44 will. Amazing video. Mike.
Space in between each sheet changes the final number. With blowout of the back of the drywall would allow more sheets or less sheets of penetration. The tightly packed sheets cause the rounds to compact the drywall. Need to space the dry wall by 4 inches to get a good reading on what really happens.
I feel like I'm watching the count on sesame street. "1 sheet of drywall...hmm, hmm, hmm. 2 sheets of drywall ...hmm, hmm, hmm"
Guess he made this video before building materials shot through the roof.
Great post pmsl
😂
Drywall is notorious for inhibiting expansion in most hollow point rounds. No hydrostatic pressure to expand the projectile against the hard drywall around it.
Yeah definitely. The larger holes going through the drywall were from the bullets tumbling. Great video.
Hydrostatic shock expand some wet ass when the bulett is supersonic, not the bulett. For bulett expansion you need a more cavernous holowpoint, higher diameter holow and soft lead not hardcast, or corbone with a hard ball placed in a similar conic shape cavernous soft bulett, or EFMJ that have radial striated FMJ over a front soft elastomer part placed over a back weight.
Remember, solid nose bullets penetrate much farther than hollow point
It also instantly plugs the hollow cavity, eliminating expansion, and basically turning it into a ball round.
Test inconclusive. Unequal barrel lengths.
I thought the same thing but the 44 magnum still outperformed
@@knowone8671 That's true, sir.
Good video idea! I once toured a business that fitted bullet proof panels into cars! Awesome stuff. Your family is lucky to have you testing the technology.
Oh yeah, I think the lack of expansion made for a better test. Those unexpanded hollow points penetrated much more than if they had mushroomed. Better test the next idea using fmj just to be sure.
That’s a beautiful Ruger 44 mag snubbie! I would have guessed about 12-15 sheets at most. Surprising results! Wondering if the hollow points got packed with drywall, which stopped the expansion.
Yeah, round nose full metal jacket would probably go deeper.
Definitely I'd say
Interesting story from a police officer. A woman was trying to scare her husband (who liked to beat the hell out of her), so she shot the wall next to him with a .357 Magnum. The bullet passed through two interior walls, punched its way out through the outside brick wall, flew into the neighbor's yard, between the neighbor's legs, and punched a hole through his lawnmower's engine. He didn't know what happened. Just all the sudden his lawn mower stopped. He looked and there was a stream of oil coming out of the engine. He didn't have any idea what happened until the police showed up at his neighbor's house and traced the bullet path to his lawn mower.
Shoulda bought a Deere.
Yike it should be more careful it too much power would go thru I wouldn't want to use too much power the best way is used wiser to shoot with with 9mm pistol I don't want to be trouble hurting someone to be sued . 9mm it should be alright. 9mm would go to 10 walls maybe I m guessing.
Nine looks small in comparison to these revolver rounds, but it has pretty good penetration. Your guess as to how many sheets sounds pretty good, so shooting from inside a normal house rather than from one end to the other would probably come out and threaten others!
Unlikely it would have gone through the brick and still have enough energy to damage that lawn mower.
The officers I’ve seen in action couldn’t find their own ass with both hands, I’m calling BS on that.
I'm surprised, never thought they'd go that far . Good job , thank you.
Loved this video, I have both of these guns. Keep up the great work!
The barrels should be the same such as 4" or 6" instead of 4" verses 2 1/2".
I agree. Losing a lot of pressure with the short barrel.
You're on the money!!!
Why is that even important. The simple tech data from the mfg should answer your question - if you think it is important. Otherwise you are just playing with.....
@@thatguy-art6229 Well here is the difference the shorter barrel expels the slug quicker and in so doing a lot of unburnt power and pressure with it. The longer barrel give the slug more speed because of the longer barrel. The simple tech data needs be examined for what barrel length the information was obtained from.
I'm sure he'd be willing to do the test with equal length barrels if you give him whatever meets your technical standards.
Barrel length makes a major difference too as it captures more energy from the cartridge to propel the round. If the .44 Mag had a longer barrel to match the .357 it would have probably gone through 2 more sheets of drywall.
That's what I was thinking 🤔
I was gonna say the same before I even watched the video.
@@johnjaffe6107 I'm glad I read your comment 😊 genius thank you
Yep!
Yep,,big dif between my snubby and my 6",,,
In the “good old days” we used rolls of newspapers to stuff inside the walls where insulation would be placed. A .38 makes an excellent home protection gun as the bullet has less of a chance of wall penetration as do larger calibers and when a .38 enters the body it tends to bounce off the ribs inside the body , causing a lot of damage.
Like a m16 round does.
@peter - you dumb
@@grindfreakmike5754 Neither bullets "bounce" The 223 round shatters and those pieces create multiple wound channels.
Ummmm 38 sucks 😂
isn't a .357 Mag bullet smaller than a .38? Doesn't it always penetrate better than a .38 with the same grains of powder?
My guess was 16 layers. I have no experience with either gun or caliber but I figured drywall doesn’t put up much resistance. It would be good to see if spacing with 2x4s changes anything, or fiberglass insulation.
Ditto said something similar. I’ve seen watermelons stop a .357. And I’ve seen ten explode from the same test.
I have a Ruger 44 mag with 7 1/2 inch barrel. I stacked 12 inches of fully dried treated lumber left over from a deck build. It included two 4x4’s and four 5/4 inch decking lumber. All of it was several years old and very hard. I used Garret 310 grain hard cast bullets from about 10 feet. I fired two bullets. Both were stopped at 9 inches penetration and did not deform much. I bought the garrets to take on a backpacking trip into grizzle bear country (Bob Marshall, Montana). One member of our party carried a 475 Linebaugh and I carried the 44 mag. Everyone else carried bear spray as did I.
I wanted to be sure my rounds would penetrate and crush bone. I’m satisfied with the power. It is not fun to shoot that heavy load but put 44 special in it and there is very little recoil.
Both turned into an FMJ, common dry wall issue. Good vid!
Great video; I would suggest using 2x6 framing with cement board over blue-board and fill the hollow with gravel and sand - 5.5 inches of gravel and sand may seem heavy, but it's not that heavy and I am pretty sure such a wall with a total of 8.5 depth and a hollow filled with 5.5 inches of sand and something like bluestone gravel will stop the magnums and likely even rifle rounds. Maybe you could make a small version and test it. Good luck. David
Maybe a sheet of 1/8" steel added for good measure. You're right though, that gravel fill would go a long, long way.
I was talking to a home inspector and he said he got into the wall of his 1920s farmhouse here in Michigan in the cavities were full of sand. I told him at least his house was bulletproof.
Damn re-upload an old video from 3 years ago and it got more views good for you. Nice video very informative as I'm looking to buy a revolver but haven't decided on caliber
YT is whack
I'm completely amazed at how many layers were penatrated
That's what your mom said to me last night
The Paper Goomba ur real cool what are u 12
@@tomprice3513 Yes 12/10 in looks according to ur mom
@@thepapergoomba9390 ain't going to lie, that was a good comeback.
penetrated
If barrel lengths were the same, I feel the 44 Mag would have made it through a few more layers. Great video.
That was the first thing I noticed was the barrel lengths are not the same
Yea hate when people try to do videos like this but they don’t use the same ammo in all the different calibers or different barrel lengths and expect it to be a accurate test it’s one thing to title it shooting drywall but idk
@@sirshootsalott I once did a comparison between a Cadillac and an oil fryer to see which one made the best Tie-dye T-shirts using spoiled sour cream on one and used transmission fluid on the other.
@@RU2AIM sounds lit
Yeah, I'll have to admit I believe I was. 😉
Thats crazy..... Nice job. Really enjoyed it!
I guessed 12 sheets for the 44 mag. For the 357 I wasn’t sure if it would be a few sheets more or a few less. But wow, both are impressive! After seeing this I’m thinking a 500 S&W mag would probably go through all of them. Great test and thank you for doing it!
and don,t foreget the broken/damaged wrist cartlidge in shooting hand.
@@vincesmith764 what called short barrel revolver ? 44 magnums or
@@vincesmith764 yeah hear you there. If one is firing a 50 tell you what that better have a long barrel and you'd want some weight on that thing as well.
@@leecowell8165 understood. i,m getting maturerer .every year. same goes with my .357,s. :)
Looking forward to this, always like real world demonstrations, cuz nobody has stacks of pumpkins in their homes but drywall is everywhere.
I was only expecting 4 or 6 sheets of penetration. The 44 mag is a few inches shorter. I think the 44 gains 25 to 50 fps per inch of additional length which translates to 12 to 25 ft/lbs energy per inch. Which may add an additional 1 to two more sheets of penetration. In any regards, this was an interesting test. Thank you.
Drywall is made of gypsum powder, very loose and soft. If you put one layer of ceramic tile of the same thickness as the second and fourth layer, I guess both guns will stop at the 5th layer drywall.
Good simple study of power. Reminds me of the old Box O Truth testing. Good Job!
I've been carrying same ammo in Taurus 627 but time for a change unless using it in bear territory. I thought maybe 10 to 12 sheets. Surprising video on over penetration. Thanks
Epic, look forward to seeing more tests :)
Pretty amazing. After seeing you shoot both, I'm glad I have the .357 myself since the .44 almost broke your wrist!!
Enjoyed watching your video. Thanks.
I’ve shot auto pistols thru drywall before and they penetrated 14-15 layers. I spaced my drywall layers about an inch apart. A 5.56 rifle penetrated about 9 layers with fragments past the 3rd layer.
I've seen some safe rooms designed to have layers of 3/4" plywood and layers of sheet metal, in addition to drywall. Seeing this experiment makes me think that might be a good idea.
The sheet metal helps a lot. Did this experiment years ago. I think the result was 5 layers of 1/2 inch with sheet metal between each (.357). Looonnng time ago though.
I actually guessed 20 sheets for the .357 and 24 for the .44 magnum. Not really surprising that the rounds didn't expand, the drywall is too soft to cause the rounds to mushroom. Considering how a .22 can punch through drywall you have to know these high power rounds can really penetrate.
It proves that magnums are not good for home defense unless you live alone and don't have any neighbors nearby.
Good presentation, for me the.357 is the best shooting cal. however the Mag part might get me sued if I had to use it in defense. That's why I recommend the 45ACP for all carry needs. It won't go through boards like butter but splits melons just fine.
I’ve had 357‘s for decades and have only fired a 44 magnum a few times decades ago. Have no desire to own a 44 but I’ll watch any comparison between the two. Thanks for the video sir👍🏻
i want a 44 magnum lever action rifle, bout as small as id go for that big of a boom
@@bradhaines3142 Lever actions and revolvers are my favorites. And if I had to choose I’d probably go single action on the revolver. How’s that for being old-fashioned😂 I’ve kept some of those around for decades now all in 357/38. People are really liking the Henry’s. We’ll see what Ruger does with Marlin. If they can get anywhere near the JB stamped Marlin products, those will be hard to beat.
@@sweetdrahthaar7951 i want to get a CC license and a pistol with all the fixings (good holster and such for it, pile of ammo, etc) but soon as i get all that, im getting a henry. they look so nice, the design is so classic. and in large pistol caliber are reasonably punchy in both directions
@@bradhaines3142 You can’t go wrong with a Henry.. they are doing a real nice job on their products and quality control as far as I know is real good. Here’s a quick Henry story: I bought one of their 22s secondhand. Can’t remember the model number but it’s an octagon barrel. This has been quite a while ago and upgrade wood kits were available back then so I called them up and said I’d like to dress mine up a little with some figured word. They said we don’t do that anymore but we’ve got lots of wood sets. I said well pick one of the better ones you’ve got and I’ll buy it. They said we’ll send you the best we have no charge. And they did. They said if it’s not better than what you’ve got just go ahead and keep it. It wasn’t really better than what was on the rifle but I’ve got an extra set of furniture now. That’s a pretty impressive company in my opinion👍🏻
Pretty cool test... I guessed 18, and was thinking too bad the barrels weren't the same length but it looks like it didn't make a big difference.
Another test would be a drywall-Stud-drywall stack up.
I enjoyed seeing the recoil comparison between the two calibers when you held the revolvers with one hand.
That 44 really looked like it broke the wrist in slow motion.
Good video, WhoTee. Actually, excellent!
Note to self dont use drywall as cover...
Adam, don't you think the 44magnum would have made about 4 more sheets if it had an 8 inch barrel?
Of course it wldve I like snub nose heavy caliber pistols tho the intent 4 em is 2 get up close and personal
@@BlaccSuave Rather use a 5 inch and put the barrel in their navel. and I wouldn't waste 40% of the powder charge.
Had the barrels been of equal length, the 44 would have definitely penetrated a few more boards.
My 44mag Ruger has a 7in barrel. I bought it in the mid 80s. Last year I put a Leopold scope on it. Love it
Maybe, but then again if the bullet was traveling faster it may have flattened the bullet more causing a larger hole and less penetration'
Very nice video. Well done with out all the technical, gun store, know it all, mumbo jumbo.
Thanks for watching
I too, guessed at 7 layers, because using hollow points rather than wadcutters would allow the wallboard to "clog" the hollow, reducing inertia. However, I thought the 4 inch vs 2&1/2 inch BBL, and the smaller diameter (less resistance?) Would all the .357 to travel farther. But I was guessing also.
Doesn't surprise me. When you fire into something that plugs a JHP, it' becomes a FMJ. Thanks!
Blast the Clay Men. They got it coming. You know, Flash Gordon had issues with the Clay Men so you’re not the first.
Flash!!!!!!!!!!!! Ahhhhhhh savior of the universe
@@drunkencracker8517 That’s our boy, circa 1930 something or other.
I have done similar test. The 44 with the same length barrel, will do a significant amount more damage. I used both in a 8 inch barrel. In my belief, you might not had quite enough drywall to stop the 44Mag. The velocity would have been a lot higher.
Thanks for listening and for your video.
Thanks for the interesting video. I'd like to see more tests including shotgun 00Buckshot. I'd also like to get the specs on the drywall, e.g. type, thickness, etc. I also wonder if air space between the layers of drywall would significantly change the results.
20 sheet of drywall probably cost more than the bulletproof 😂
Yes and one must think of the LOAD on the flloor and walls.
Both of those calibres are nothing to sneeze at, love the look of that ruger 👍👍oh you can sure see the difference in the recoil in the slomo
Awesome video man!
I really enjoy your video's. They help me understand firearms much better. I was raised with "long guns" but did not know "diddly" about pistols.
Appreciate you watching
So, I skipped to the end and probably missed useful details on the ammo, but here are my concerns: For a valid test you need the same length barrel on both pistols, and then as close as you can get to the same projectile weight on the ammo. I also think solid ammo would be preferential to hollow points for max penetration and more uniform performance comparison. But it was still interesting to see. Thanks for the video!
The 44 was at a disadvantage dye to excesive wrist recoil due to the small snub nose barrel , try it again using the 7 3/4 inch barrel , like mine , Huge difference !
They're comparing apples to oranges. If every thing were exactly the same then what exactly would you be comparing?
The .44 was aimed at a lower angle as well...
Still nice results!
Yeah, that's what I was thinking too. Use the same length barrel.
@@gregpalermo3861 Everything else except the caliber or bullet should be the same. Even the angle of penetration should be the same. The 44 was at a disadvantage regarding the barrel lenght and the downward angle. We know that longer barrel means farther distance and downward angle is like passing a thicker board.
I wonder how far a 41 magnum would have penetrated? Or even a 357 maximum? The 44 may have went deeper if it had the same barrel length as the 357.
Love your channel Who-Tee! I'm a .44 mag guy though my .357's are great too.
Appreciate you watching
I think a good question to answer is what can we put between the Sheetrock outer wall and the inner wall to stop a bullet. What type of “insulation” can we use?
Try putting an air gap between layers like going through a wall. I'll bet it is a lot different.
I'm curious of this as well. I suspect it would travel through more sheets. You?
Now I'm wondering how many they would go through if there was an inch of space between each piece of drywall or even a half inch.
Some explanation can't be figured out
Maybe you'd drop 2 sheets.
Fantastic "REAL WORLD" test Whooti, as others pointed out, the lack of expansion was due to non hydrostatic pressure, pass it through some water in a gallon jug and then through drywall and you would have stopped at 4 or 5 and good expansion
Very informative video. I wonder what would happen if you mixed in plywood or sheet metal, along with the drywall, in your tests.
Plywood, I was thinking the same
A proper test would use same barrel lengths in the revolvers, same precise fixed rest, same weapon maker, same ammo manufacturer. Peace-good video
Very informative. I'm left with the impression there's only a minimal difference between the two rounds...at least in that medium. So between the two revolvers, from a practical sense, I'd pick the 8-round version of Ruger .357 Mag and leave the .44 Mag to those protecting themselves against bears.
Barrel length makes a huge difference in velocity!
For a bedside version, what size barrel you suggest? I am considering a 6” of either of these. Great vid
Nice guns and video my guy.. stay safe.
You should look into testing the 327 federal mag vs 357 magnum. That would be interesting.
Been done, many times...look it up...
I'd like to see the 44 vs. the 357 maximum. With the same length barrels
Everyone said I was crazy for putting 24 layers of dry wall throughout my house. Who cares if the bed no longer fits.
For safety I think is better to use bricks. May be with 24 layers you can stop a revolver bullet but not an assault rifle one.
@@jorgemelchorgreco1813 Can't understand sarcasm?? 🤷🏻
Interesting. Thanks for testing and sharing.
Good video sir,cheap,interesting. Didn't think they go through that many
GREAT test here with unbelievable results, would love to see the same test using Buffalo Bore ammo !
I think you'd be better off using plate steel to line your safe room. I knew your 6 or 7 sheet guess was going to be way low.
dont forget to paint to prevent rust
That ruger tho🤙 also this guy gives me big bro vibes subbed
alternatively to putting extra layers of drywall you can put an inch of plywood then drywall.
Would love to see a more real-world test of this type with a firearm. My focus is on pellet rifles and there is at least one good video where the test was done with sheets of drywall attached to 2x4 stud sections and then line up approximating actual walls of a house. It would be expected for the drywall stacked in this video to stop the rounds much faster than actual walls of a house where each 5/8" thick sheet is separated so that there is no progressive increase in resistance as material compresses in front of the round. The .22 caliber PCP air rifle punched thru something on the order of 8 sheets of drywall so I expect that if these were set up like actual framed wall sections the penetration would be at least 50% greater than in this test.
Revealing one layer at a time was stupidly fascinating, loved the suspense.
No…just Stupid ..and boring…suspense?? 😂
How to make a 2 minute last 4 hours.
Great VDO •. What about a 9 mm +P with flat nosed hard cast bullets? How many sheets of drywall?
I not only think that barrel length makes a difference but the grain of bullet changes the velocity of a bullet as well. If the .44 mag was shooting with a comparable barrel length and a comparable grain of bullet, my guess is that it would have shot through 5 or 6 more sheets than the .357 mag.
Both of these rounds have significant velocity changes with barrel lenght increases. Its one of the things that makes them such great all-round survival rounds. Test them out of a lever action carbine and watch the difference it makes.
I was thinking the same. I am thinking he might need a few more sheets of drywall.
Love the big dog 44s , very surprised with both bullets performance though
Thank you for doing this!
Thanks for watching Bob
for a safe room -- Tear out the partition walls of your walk in closet (if you have one) and replace with solid 4 x 4's, then drywall each side as normal.
The drywall, like clothing, plugged the hollow cavity in the bullets. A more fair test would have been pistols with equal barrel length. The 357 has a two inch longer barrel. Also, the 357 round was a light bullet (150 grains) and the 44 mag was a heavy bullet (240 grains). A more equal test would be to use a 185 grain bullet in the 44 and use equal length barrels. Too many variables to call a true winner.
Standard bullet weights are 158 and 240.
@@everettyost8639 Certainly drywall will clog the cavity if it doesn't start to expand immediately.
Nice guns! Very interesting results, I didn't expect that outcome. I too expected around 7 or 8 deep. It would be really interesting to see the exact same test with a 9mm, 380 and 22 from pistols, perhaps 45 and 40 too. Lots of people carry 9mm and 380, I would especially like to see those results.
meh a cellphone lithium battery can stop a bullet completely 9mm
I have 2 issues with this test. 1. Barrel length is important for a test like this, and was obviously different and was not mentioned. 2. I'm betting in the real world, where the drywall layers are separated by large gaps, results would be different.
H
In Georgia where I live, not sure it's still the law, but when handguns were first legalized for whitetail deer, there was a requirement of minimum 500 ft lbs muzzle energy. At the time, I read up on it since I had no experience with handguns. There were only 2 common loads that could achieve that, the 44mag and the 357mag. Barrel length was a factor. So legally you had to have something like 8 or 10 inch barrel with the 357 and I like the flexibility of being able to use it with 38 for home defense. So, I lost interest, since that is not much more convenient than a rifle, and for me, didn't make sense since I'm pretty good with a rifle and not so much with a handgun.
Very interesting!!!
BTW Beautiful pistols both!
If that 44 had a longer barrel it might’ve gone through another 5?
I believe a better test would be to have allowed 2 inches between each sheet of wallboard, you might find out that the bullets would go through more sheets. With the sheets pressed up against each other think it would take more energy to push the backside paper into the next sheet of wallboard. Obviously walls are not built with the wallboard stacked one next to the orher. I'd like to see another test with two by four studs with wallboard on each side.
I concur. The space between would allow for greatly different energy trasfer as the drywall would be allowed to flex as well as not pushing the paper into the next sheet. Probably would not need a full two inches either. Just a 1x1 would do the trick.
That was a Great Video !! 🙂👍
The bullets held together because of the tightness of the drywall packed together it was no room for expansion between drywalls so essentially you shot through a solid Mass and the bullet has no ability to expand sideways hope this one isn't too late
Very impressed with the .357. I figured around 10 sheets for both
I would have bet those bullets would stop at 9 or 10 sheets for 357 and maybe 12 to 14 for the .44!
That's penetration for ya! I do enjoy these tests, when we can see exactly what happens.
Maybe, if you can, the next time you do this test, you can have brand new bullets to put beside the fired one's so we can really see what happens to each.
The .357 Magnum and .44 Magnum are classics. They're both versatile and work in a wide range of situations.
Amazing that the 357 kept up with the 44 that well.
as Joe Sikora pointed out. If barrel length had been the same, the 44mag would have gone quite a bit further. I willing to bet that my BFR 45/90 with 500 grain solids would have made both of those little guns look quite inadeguate.
357 the best caliber.
The dry wall was back to back. It would have gone through many more if the dry wall was spaced out like a normal wall with 4'' studs. Provided you didn't hit a stud. At 17 layers it could potentially go through 8 or more rooms if it didn't hit a stud.
Was going to post that if walls had spacing the bullet would have lost momentum between walls
Consider comparisons with fire resistant and water resistant drywall. You may find considerable differences in penetration.
I was thinking the same thing. That looks like half inch drywall which is pretty standard for interior walls. I wonder how 5/8 fire rock would handle some rounds.
@@jt76801 Me too. I redid my interior walls on a log house. There’s a big difference in drywall types. Since I don’t know the right terms I’ll just say the formulas for the materials are a lot different. I don’t think any of it will stop magnum revolver rounds in any practical way, but reshooting this video would be a good start in getting a baseline.
Wow I didn't think it would be that many pieces! Good test
I agree with Joe...barrel length on the 44 kept velocity down and penetration.
Space the sheetrocks an inch apart and see how many that .44 Red Wristbreaker can get through. Maybe try brass solid extreme penetrator .44 rounds just for funsies.
Good test penetrated more than I thought it would. Like to see a test done with equal barrel lengths and hollow point vs solid point.
What they should have done is testing 3 Revolvers. SW Model 27 .357 Magnum 4 in. 158 gr And SW Model 57 .41 Magnum 4 in. 210 gr And SW model 29 4 in 240 gr all with jacketed bullets.
I'm wondering if brick walls could possibly be less expensive than special bullet proof drywall.
Now I want to see how many bricks can be penetrated hitting center of an 8-foot wall. It's been done before.
Great vocast. What material could be a could material to accompany for example, one layer of drywall?